Its marvels will never cease

(Jami Tirmidhi)

Scientific and Archaeological Explanation of

the Ayaats of the Holy Quran

For the complete work, visit our blog

Miraculousquran.blogspot.com

Comments, queries and feedback at

Muhammad.Awais.Tahir@gmail.com
 Surah Ale Imran
Ayat 59

Surely, the likeness of Isa is with Allah as the likeness of Adam; He created him from dust, then said to
him, Be, and he was.

M Shakir's Quran Translation

Introduction to Darwinism
The person, who originally put forward the theory of evolution, was an amateur English biologist by the name of
Charles Robert Darwin. Darwin first published his ideas in a book entitled The Origin of Species by Means of Natural
Selection in 1859. Darwin claimed in his book that all living beings had a common ancestor and that they evolved
from one another by means of natural selection. Those that best adapted to the habitat transferred their traits to
subsequent generations, and by accumulating over great epochs, these advantageous qualities transformed
individuals into very different species from their ancestors. The human being was thus the most developed product
of the mechanism of natural selection. In short, the origin of one species was another species.

Darwinism incompatible with Quran

Hazrat Adam Peace be upon him was the first person on the face of the earth. This is the concept of Quran as well as
the concept of Bible. A vast Majority of the people on the earth believe that Hazrat Adam was the first man on the
surface of the earth and this verse gives a little description of the creation of Hazrat Adam. Allah created him from
dust and said to him be and it was. Hazrat Adam's creation is a more superior miracle. Hazrat Adam was created
without mother or father. Allah created him directly and made his spirit with a mere command, Be, and it was. This
verse of Quran goes against Darwinism.

Darwinism incompatible with Bible

As mentioned earlier Darwinism is not compatible with Islam. Darwinism is also against Christianity. Christian
Fundamentalists and others who believe in the biblical story of creation choose to reject evolutionary theory
because it contradicts the book of Genesis, which describes how God created the world and all its plant and animal
life in six days. The creation from dust is also mentioned in the bible. "Then the Lord God formed man of dust from
the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living being." (BOOK OF GENESIS
CHAPTER NO 2 VERSE NO 7)

Charles Darwin admits himself

Darwinism has lost its significance when we compare it with the modern science. Darwinism is based on mere
hypothesis and has no proof from established science. Darwinism goes against logic, religion and established science.
Charles Darwin wrote a letter to his friend Thomas Thomtan, in 1861 saying ‘I do not believe in ‘Natural Selection’. I
do not believe in ‘Theory of Evolution’ because I do not have any proof. I only believe in it because it helps me in
classification of Embryology, in Morphology, in rudimentary organs’.

Why is Darwinism illogical

According to the unscientific and irrational claim of the theory of evolution, the nothingness in the infinite universe
gradually gave rise to humankind because of chance developments. According to this utterly unbelievable theory,
first dust, then soil, stones, waters, mountains and oceans came spontaneously into being in this nothingness devoid
of anything of the sort. Later, certain atoms in the mixtures of these came together by chance and brought into
being such elements as calcium, phosphorus and carbon. Over millions of years these lifeless elements, completely
lacking in intellect, memory, knowledge and consciousness, turned into human beings able to breathe, speak, think,
rejoice and mourn, possessed of a soul and memory, with the intelligence, knowledge and consciousness necessary
to invent things, and capable of writing libraries full of books. In other words, under the effects of coincidence over
billions of years, accumulations of dust, soil and mud turned into human beings of flesh, blood and soul, capable of
building extraordinary factories and producing the latest model of cars in them, of establishing space stations, of
constructing palaces, and making marvels of art. To believe that stone and soil could one day turn into human beings
as the result of chance is even more irrational and illogical than believing in fairy tales.

Just for a moment, look at the things around you. Is it possible to think that may be the wristwatch you are wearing
came to existence by itself? Is it possible that the room you are sitting in came into existence on its own? If even a
single pencil, a needle cannot come into existence by itself. How can the billions of types of creatures on the surface
of the earth come into existence on their own? There are almost 200 million known species and surely, there are
many more still awaiting to be identified. There are almost 25,000 recognized types of fishes and about 200-300 new
are identified each year. The small insects we see everywhere; 1 million different species of insects have been
identified so far. Did all those species come to existence own their own? Is not there a divine design behind it? Five
years after the publication of Darwin's book, Louis

Pasteur announced his results after long studies and experiments, which disproved spontaneous generation, a
cornerstone of Darwin's theory. In a lecture at the Sorbonne in 1864, Pasteur said; “Never will the doctrine of
spontaneous generation recover from the mortal blow struck by this simple experiment.”

An Impossible Event
The theory of evolution claims that the complex systems of the cell came into existence "by chance" under the
conditions of the primordial earth. Actually, the probability of forming a cell by chance is about the same as that of
producing a perfect copy of a book following an explosion in a printing house.

The English mathematician and astronomer Sir Fred Hoyle(1915-2001) made a similar comparison in an interview
published in Nature magazine on November 12, 1981.Although an evolutionist himself, Hoyle stated that the chance
that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable to the chance that a tornado sweeping through
a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein ( "Hoyle on Evolution," Nature, vol. 294,
November 12, 1981, p. 105). This means that it is not possible for the cell to have come into being by chance, and
therefore it must definitely have been "created."

Other mathematical calculations show that the probability of what Darwinism claims comes out to be 'one' out of 10
to the power of 950. In mathematics an event which has a chance of 'one' out of 10 to the power of 50 is an
impossible event so an event which is 10 to the power of 950 is totally out of question. Imagine tossing a coin 10 to
the power 950 (i.e. 950 zeros after 1) times and amazingly every time head comes.

10 950 =

100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,
000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

One more thing to be clarified here is that the above-mentioned probability is just for a average protein molecule
coming by itself. There are many other complexities in a human body and all other species. When all those
probabilities are multiplied, the numbers would be unimaginable. (Note: Probabilities are multiplied, not added)

For more details: Evolution Deceit, Darwinism refuted by Harun Yahya

(Books of Harun Yahya have answered all questions on Darwinism. These books are a masterpiece in this regard)

Why is Darwinism unscientific

When Charles Darwin presented the theory of Darwinism in 1859, it had no scientific proof on its back. Darwinism
can never explain scientific discoveries in genetics and the immense amount of information stored in DNA. The
complex structure of a human cell formed by a mere chance is something unscientific too. Scientists have tried to
prove Darwinism from the fossil evidences but the truth is that no evidence is in favour of Darwinism. There are so
many missing links and no transitional form has been discovered. If the species evolved like Darwinism claims then
there should be much many transitional forms. Charles Darwin himself wrote in his book origin of species.

"Why, if species have descended from other species by fine gradations, do we not everywhere see innumerable
transitional forms? Why is not all nature in confusion, instead of the species being, as we see them, well defined?…
But, as by this theory innumerable transitional forms must have existed, why do we not find them embedded in
countless numbers in the crust of the earth?… But in the intermediate region, having intermediate conditions of life,
why do we not now find closely-linking intermediate varieties? This difficulty for a long time quite confounded me."

Many renowned scientists spoke against Darwinism.

Fact of Creation
When we look closely into what Darwinism propagates, it all looks like an attempt to 'exclude' the hand of God from
creation. Many scientists have been trying to bring some other theory instead of big bang that could explain the
beginning of the earth because the only way to perceive big bang is that there is a divine hand behind it. Many
theories were presented as a substitute for big bang but they lost their significance because there are so many solid
proofs for big bang. In the similar fashion, Darwinism is an attempt to deny the 'fact of creation'.

These words can summarize what I wanted to say on Darwinism:

"The result of these cumulative efforts to investigate the cell – to investigate life at the molecular level – is a loud,
clear, piercing cry of "design!" The result is so unambiguous and so significant that it must be ranked as one of the
greatest achievements in the history of science. This triumph of science should evoke cries of "Eureka" from ten
thousand throats.

But, no bottles have been uncorked, no hands clapped. Instead, a curious, embarrassed silence surrounds the stark
complexity of the cell. When the subject comes up in public, feet start to shuffle, and breathing gets a bit labored. In
private people are a bit more relaxed; many explicitly admit the obvious but then stare at the ground, shake their
heads, and let it go like that. Why does the scientific community not greedily embrace its startling discovery? Why is
the observation of design handled with intellectual gloves? The dilemma is that while one side of the elephant is
labeled intelligent design, the other side must be labeled God."
These are the words of renowned scientist Michael J. Behe. (MICHAEL J. BEHE, DARWIN'S BLACK BOX, NEW YORK: FREE
PRESS, 1996, PP. 232-233)

In short, theory of special creation is supported by logic, religion and modern science. Hence, it should be replaced
instead of Darwinism and Darwinism should be buried forever.

Further Reading on Darwinism

Many scientists and atheists have been working hard in the past years to find proofs for Darwinism. For this very
purpose they have tried all methods in the book and out of the book too. Many fake "fossils" were presented. Many
books have been written to unveil the evolution deceit. It is not possible to cover all the aspects here. For further
reading, you are advised to read the following books:

1-Darwinism Refuted – Harun Yahya (also available in PDF form on the net)

2-Why Darwinism is incompatible with the Quran – Harun Yahya

3-How fossils overturned evolution – Harun Yahya

Creation from Dust

We have reached to a conclusion that First man on earth Hazrat Adam was created from Mud by Allah. Same thing
we excerpted from bible and Quran both. Quran mentions two stages (or types) of creation. One of it is the creation
of Adam and other is the creation of children of Adam. Adam was created from dust as this verse clearly states. He
created him from dust, then said to him, Be, and he was. At other places in the Quran mentions creation from

Water (21:30), (24:45), (25:54)

Semen (16:4) , (75:37)

These verses are actually referring to the second stage of creation or second type of creation; creation of off springs
of Adam. If the two stages or two types are not taken into account, it can lead to great mistakes. Regarding water
one thing to be clarified is that it has its part in both stages of creation. Detailed discussion on creation from water
under (SURAHAL ANBIYA 21:30). Allah created a very beautiful system. Allah laid the foundation of the creation himself
‘at once’ (not what Darwinism claims). Furthermore Allah gave humans a system by which they can reproduce
themselves.

The two stages are clearly mentioned in the Quran in Surah Sajdah

Who made good everything that He has created, and He began the creation of man from dust. Then He made his
progeny of an extract, of water held in light estimation. (SURAH SAJDAH 32:7-8)

Further more it is mentioned in Surah Hajj

“O people! if you are in doubt about the raising, then surely We created you from dust, then from a small seed,
then from a clot, then from a lump of flesh, complete in make and incomplete, that We may make clear to you;
and We cause what We please to stay in the wombs till an appointed time, then We bring you forth as babies……”
(SURAH HAJJ 22:5)

Same thing is mentioned in Surah Ghafir

He it is Who created you from dust, then from a small life germ, then from a clot, then He brings you forth as a
child, then that you may attain your maturity, then that you may be old-- and of you there are some who are
caused to die before-- and that you may reach an appointed term, and that you may understand. (SURAH GHAFIR
40:67)

Regarding creation from soil one more thing is to be clarified that at some places Quran addresses the children of
Adam and mentions the creation from water for them.

And one of His signs is that He created you from dust (30:20). It is but natural that the real source of creation of all of
us is dust. If Adam wasn’t there we wouldn’t have been present too. Hence we owe our existence to Adam and we
owe our existence to the ‘dust’.

Quran mentions the creation from dust, mud in several places

Surah Ale Imran (3:59), Surah Ar Rum(30:20),Surah Taha (20:55),Surah Al Faatir (35:11), Surah Al Hajj (22:5), (38:71),
Surah Al Ghaafir(40:67)

This document is based on my under process book. I plan to collect all the Ayaats of the Holy Quran with deal with
scientific, historical and archaeological subjects. I am trying to provide explanation to those Ayaats in light of
Previous commentaries (Tafaseer), established science, archaeological discoveries and Arabic lexicons. Send in
your comments, queries and suggestion at Muhammad.Awais.Tahir@gmail.com

Please do not copy paste without permission, until my book is published, Insha’Allah.

For the complete work, visit our blog

Miraculousquran.blogspot.com