Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The compensation and benefits processes belong to most important HR Processes, which are critical for the organization and modern HR organization. The compensation and benefits is about managing the personnel expenses budget, setting the performance standards, setting the transparent compensation policies and introducing the competitive benefits for emplo ees. The organization with effective compensation and benefits drives its personnel costs, manages the performance of emplo ees and rewards the extraordinar performance.
bonus pa out as the organization "eeps the financial stabilit and the planned personnel expenses budget is "ept. The compensation and benefits department has special processes to monitor the external !ob mar"et as it can set the right compensation policy, which is compliant with the approved compensation strateg . The compensation and benefits department is responsible for the extensive monitoring of the mar"et and designing the new compensation components inspired b the HR Best Practices in the compensation area. The compensation and benefits department is alwa s closel attached to the development of the new compensation components, which support the performance and effectivit of the organization. &t co$operates with the different business units and it aligns their re'uests into the general rules for the compensation components, which are transparent and fair. The compensation and benefits designs new ad!ustments to the compensation strategy and the compensation policy as the organization does not lose its competitive advantage on the !ob mar"et.
Compensation #trateg
o o o o o
Compensation #trateg (e Content Pa )ar"et #trategic Position #etting Compensation Consultants and Compensation #trateg Compensation #trateg building Competitive %dvantage *h is compensation strateg important+
o o
#alar #urve s
Compensation #trateg
The compensation strategy is extremel important as the right compensation strateg helps to build the effective and competitive organization and the wrong setting of the compensation strateg , which does not fit with the needs of the organization and with the HR and Business #trategies, can destro the organization within several ears and the organization suffers from decreased performance and not utilizing the full potential of emplo ees.
organization and the as" for the progress of the implementation of compensation strateg on the regular basis. The HR #trateg has to be alwa s designed and developed with having the respect to the situation in the compensation area in the organization. The HR #trateg cannot set the ambition, which is not suitable for the compan . The HR #trateg alwa s defines the basic principles for the compensation scheme in the organization and the compensation strateg defines the details for the components and when and how the will be introduced or redesigned. The compensation strateg should be updated, when Human Resources ma"es significant changes to the HR #trateg or the organization changes its business strateg . The compensation strateg has alwa s support the business and its selling capabilities.
The managers are the users of the compensation polic and the should understand, it is based on the approved principles from the strateg . The compensation polic can change on the regular -usuall earl . basis, but the strateg is consistent over a longer period of time and the managers can plan the career of the subordinates.
The compensation is a part of the complex HR processes, policies and procedures. The top management and Human Resources have to decide, what will be the primar role of compensation in the organization. #ome organizations prefer the supplementar role of
the compensation and other organizations prefer the dominant role of the compensation. This compensation decision is extremel important as it sets the general framewor" for the compensation components, if the will exist in the organization or the will be the part of the other HR polic . The compensation strateg has definitel include the description of the role of the compensation in the organization.
Competitiveness
The competitiveness of the compensation is another important compensation decision. The organization can decide to be aggressive with the compensation strateg and it can set the aggressive position on the pa mar"et, but this strateg is extremel expensive for the organization and it has to balance it with high margin on the products and services. 1n the other hand, the organization can choose to offer the career and development opportunities, it can increase the responsibilities of the individual emplo ees and it can balance aim to the lower level of the compensation on the pa mar"et. The decision about the competitiveness of the compensation strateg is extremel important as it has a huge impact on the costs of the organization and it re'uests the right setting of other HR Processes.
&nternal #tructures
The organization does not have to follow the same pa mar"et and the same level for all the !ob positions. &t is extremel important compensation decision to be included in the compensation strateg . The organization can decide about ma"ing huge pa differences across different units or it can decide about the different pa level for the experts and managers as it protects the "now how.
%dministration
The administration is a tough compensation decision in the compensation strateg as it sets the roles and responsibilities of Human Resources, managers, top managers in the compensation processes. The organization can decide about preferring the decentralized compensation model, when the manager decides most issues and pa increases, but Human Resources is in a danger of not "eeping the total personnel expenses budget. &n the centralized compensation strateg , the HR )anagers are the main decision ma"ers and the emplo ees and managers do not feel the comfort of the free decision.
!. What are the costs of the setting the strategic position on the pay market?
#etting the strategic pa mar"et position without the proper anal sis and calculation is !ust a hazard with the future of Human Resources in the organization as the top management can be amazed, how expensive the strategic pa mar"et position is.
The excellent compensation consultant alwa s as"s the clients about the feedbac" and how the solutions wor" in practice to have the experience to build on. The compensation consultant can see a new creative solution in one compan , which can help to build the HR competitive advantage in another organization. The compensation consultant can help to design the state-of-the-art compensation strategy and can save huge costs to the organization in the future.
&t is 'uite dangerous to set the pa mar"et position too high as the organization has to carr the increased costs and eats more from the margins on the products and services. The organization cannot ma"e 'uic" changes and the recession can be deadl dangerous for the organization as it carries higher costs to "eep the processes operating and functional. The competitors have a better and bigger space to decrease the personnel costs in bad times. The higher competitive position on the pa mar"et can be used in the time, the organization grows dramaticall and it needs the best talents from the !ob mar"et and there is no time to decide about the "e !ob positions in the organization and all emplo ees are treated to be of the same importance. (eeping the long term higher pa mar"et position is suitable !ust for the companies in the modern industries, with high margins and the companies with the excellent brand name being "nown for emplo ing the best of the best.
Competitive advance through strategic pa mar"et position for "e !ob positions
The competitive advantage in compensation can be set !ust for the key job positions in the organization. This solution is cheaper as the rest of the population can be "ept in line with the median of the pa mar"et or it can be below the median as the whole organization "eeps the median in general. But, the organization has to be able to reach the consensus about the "e !ob positions in the organization. #etting the "e !ob positions is the painful procedure for Human Resources getting the consensus from the top management is a bit mission impossible, but HR has to accomplish this procedure successfull as the "e !ob positions are identified and Human Resources can set the right compensation strateg for the "e !ob positions. The differentiation in the compensation strateg and setting the different pa level for the "e !ob positions is 'uite usual for the larger organizations as the save the personnel expenses and the are able to protect the "e emplo ees. &t does not protect the "e emplo ees automaticall , but it support the managers and other HR Processes as the emplo ees feel prett satisfied with their salaries.
The competitive advantage for the "e !ob positions is usuall the best pa strateg for the mature organizations, which does not grow aggressivel and are purel focused on the product innovations. The "e emplo ees bring the innovations and the rest is paid fair enough for their !ob content.
organization as well as the successful emplo ees and top talents feel the success in their poc"ets. The effective compensation strateg ma"es people feel the success and the spea" about their successes with their friends. &t build the extremel excellent competitive advantage among the competitors as the people feel, the organization reall values the success and it can pa the successful emplo ees. The effective compensation strateg manages the personnel expenses of the organization, but it supports the performance management and differentiates the emplo ees as the successful ones are not motivated to search for a new !ob opportunit . The good compensation strateg does not provo"e emplo ees to search the web !ob boards during the wor"ing hours, it ma"es them to focus on delivering the results as the can be highlighted and the feel the highlight in their salaries. The successful compensation strateg gains the competitive advantage and can speed up the innovation processes and improve the performance management practices in the organization.
Compensation Polic
The compensation policy is the basic document, which drives the detail of the compensation practices in the organization. %s the compensation strateg sets the high level compensation goals of the organization, the compensation polic describes the details of the individual compensation components, their behavior and their role in the compensation scheme of the organization.
The compensation polic belongs to most read and discussed internal policies of the organization as it drives the salaries of the individual emplo ees. ,ach emplo ee is interested in the structure of the salar and the potential total cash achievable in the organization. The compensation polic is the main tool to find out the details about the compensation components and the wa , how to achieve the highest total cash. The compensation polic drives the effort and performance of emplo ees as the emplo ees will find the smart and easiest wa how to achieve the highest possible income with the smallest possible individual performance. The compensation polic has to be set the smart wa as it avoids the potential wor"$around and abuse.
,xecutive Compensation
The top executive compensation is a special and specific area of compensation and benefits, which is usuall confidential and it is not open to all emplo ees in the organization. The top executives hold the responsibilit for the organization, the lead the development of the organization and the have a tremendous impact on the results of the organization. The compensation scheme of top executives has to
reflect the responsibilit and it has to provide the securit to the top executives to use the personal responsibilit and to ta"e courageous decisions. The executive pay is about the focus on the short$term performance and the long$ term sustainabilit of the organizational development. The top executives are motivated to search for the cost$cutting potential and focusing on the sales and performance growth in the long$term perspective as the shareholders can realize the benefits of being involved in the organization.
The short term pa of the executives is about the base salar and short term bonuses, which are paid on the basis of the immediate performance of the organization. The bonuses are usuall deferred over a period of time. The short term pa is usuall full cash based executive compensation component. The long term pa is about the stoc" options, shares, restricted stoc"s and pa based on the performance against the index. The shareholders use these long term compensation components to protect the value of the organization and betting of the top executives on the growing value of the organization on the mar"et. The long term compensation components can be realized !ust in case, the stoc" price of the organization grows. The long term pa component is usuall non$cash based.
&n the modern organizations the short term pa is !ust a small part of the total cash of the top executives.
,xcessive compensation
The excessive compensation is alwa s more the issue of trust and confidence of emplo ees and shareholders. The executive compensation scheme has to include the holdbac"s and claw$bac"s and safet bra"es for the case, the organization outperforms hugel the mar"et. ,ach executive compensation scheme needs caps and floor as it is manageable in all situations, which can happen on the mar"et
#lear foc(s on profits generation 'ong)term orientation of the compensation scheme *otivation of manager by high bon(ses +on)cash foc(s of the compensation ,stock options- shares- share phantom schemes.
o o
The executive compensation scheme has to support goals given b shareholders. The executives ta"e ris"s of failing. The have to be over$compensated for meeting goals. The should receive an enormous extra bonus for exceeding the expectations -goals given b shareholders.. The balance in the compensation has to be in favor of exceeding goals. The HR Professionals have to support the C,1 in setting the executive compensation scheme, which support the top management in pushing the organization. The top
managers have to ma"e tough decisions. The have to be compensated for overcoming the stress, the pressure of the line management and emplo ees7 complaints about constant changes in the business operation. Human Resources has to understand the main business goals. HR has to help in setting the executive compensation and alignment with the performance based compensation for the rest of the organization.
#alar #urve s
The salary surveys are extremel powerful compensation and benefits benchmarking tool. The are important for the setting right compensation strateg and for following and monitoring the desired pa mar"et. The salar surve is provided b the external compensation consultant, who gather the compensation information and salar details about the individuals, match the information and provides feedbac" about the pa mar"et and pa structures bac" to the participating organizations. The salar surve s are alwa s based on the proper job evaluation methodology, which is standardized across the industr as the compensation consultant can compare the !obs with the same !ob size as the !ob titles are not the suitable for the salar comparisons. The compan has to choose the right and suitable !ob evaluation methodolog and this "now how is usuall provided b the compensation consultants for free.
participating organizations. The salar surve can act as a tool to identif the "e !ob positions in the organization as the competitors can protect the "e !ob positions and it is usuall visible in the salar surve s. The salar surve s provide the information about the new trends in the compensation and benefits area and man surve s bring the additional information li"e the average number of emplo ees per manager, the average length of service for the compan , the number of promotions and man other.