Sei sulla pagina 1di 4

ARTICLE IN PRESS

Journal of Adolescent Health - (2009) 1–4

Adolescent health brief

Prescription Medication Sharing Among Adolescents: Prevalence,


Risks, and Outcomes
Richard C. Goldsworthy, Ph.D.a,*, and Christopher B. Mayhorn, Ph.D.b
a
The Academic Edge, Inc., Bloomington, Indiana
b
North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
Manuscript received April 2, 2009, manuscript accepted June 16, 2009

Abstract We interviewed 594 adolescents throughout the United States. One in five reported sharing prescrip-
tion medication. Of these, less than half received instructions, many delayed professional care, few
informed providers, and a third reported experiencing side effects. Efforts to reduce medication
sharing prevalence and risks among adolescents may be justified. Ó 2009 Society for Adolescent
Medicine. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Prescription medication sharing; Loaning; Borrowing; Diversion; Prevlaence; Risks; Adolescents

Prescription medication sharing has received heightened Method


attention as a public health concern, with approximately
one-third of the U.S. population self-reporting this behavior Prescription medication sharing behaviors and conse-
[1]. Several researchers have suggested diverse personal quences were assessed through interviews conducted in
and societal consequences associated with such sharing, malls, parks, and public streets in 11 U.S. urban and suburban
including exposure to side effects, delayed care, and locations. Five hundred ninety-four (>50/location) demo-
increased antibiotic resistance (Figure 1) [1–3]. Despite indi- graphically diverse adolescents aged 12-17 (mean ¼ 14.8,
cations that adolescents are engaging in this potentially risky SD ¼ 1.7) were approached individually, had the study ex-
behavior [1,4,5], few efforts have directly investigated plained to them, provided written consent, and were screened
sharing among adolescents [1,2,4–7]. Boyd and colleagues for eligibility based on age. Eligible adolescents were inter-
[8], for example, reported girls (27.5%) and boys (17.4%) viewed verbally in English or Spanish by field researchers
frequently gave away their abusable prescription medications with experience in each recruitment location, and provided
(i.e., sleeping, sedative or anxiety, stimulant, and pain medi- a $10 gift certificate and a parental notification letter. Inter-
cations). Poulin [7] reported that Canadian youth (n ¼ 13, view questions were drawn from a previous study conducted
549) had given away (14.7%) or sold (7.3%) prescription among adults, pilot tested among a small group of adoles-
stimulants. Daniel and colleagues [5] found girls and young cents, and modified. The following behaviors and conse-
women borrow (10%) prescription acne medication, a prac- quences were investigated:
tice that entails teratogenic risk [9,10]. No studies to date, 1. Have you ever borrowed prescription medication?
however, have broadly examined prevalence of adolescent 2. Have you had ever loaned prescription medication?
prescription medication sharing, types of medications shared,
and consequences of such sharing. Our research specifically Participants who indicated loaning or borrowing were
examines a wider range of loaning and borrowing behaviors asked these questions:
and associated consequences among adolescents. 1. Which kinds of medicine did you borrow (and which
did you loan)?
2. Did you receive (or provide) written or verbal warnings
and instructions?
*Address correspondence to: Richard C. Goldsworthy, Ph.D., Academic 3. Did you borrow medicine rather than visit a healthcare
Edge, Inc., 108 E. 14th Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47408. provider?
E-mail address: rick@academicedge.com 4. Did you end up going to a doctor anyway?
1054-139X/09/$ – see front matter Ó 2009 Society for Adolescent Medicine. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.06.002
ARTICLE IN PRESS

2 R.C. Goldsworthy and C.B. Mayhorn / Journal of Adolescent Health - (2009) 1–4

Figure 1. Enhancement of original medication-sharing impact framework (adapted from Goldsworthy et al., 2008).

5. Did you tell the doctor about borrowing? provider. Of these, 32.4% eventually visited a healthcare
6. Have you experienced an allergic reaction or side provider for the unresolved problem, with young women
effect when borrowing prescription medications? being more likely than men to do so. Forty percent of the
adolescents who visited providers after borrowing medica-
Descriptive statistics and inferential analyses were gener-
tions failed to mention the medication borrowing to the
ated in SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
provider (28 participants, 4.7% of the overall sample).
Finally, 37.4% of borrowers (43 participants overall) re-
Results ported experiencing a side effect.
Loaning prescription medications
Discussion
One in five participants (122 of 592, 20.5%) reported
loaning prescription medication (Table 1), with allergy medi- Approximately 20% of adolescents have shared prescrip-
cations and pain relievers most commonly loaned. Among tion medication. This is troubling, because sharing presents
loaners, 47.5% reported providing printed instructions and a number of potential risks (Figure 1). Adolescents are
55.7% reported providing verbal instructions. Results did sharing antibiotics, which may exacerbate bacteriologic anti-
not significantly vary by participant characteristics; however, biotic resistance: neither those loaning nor those borrowing
blacks were more likely to report loaning medication and are likely to have completed a full regimen. Adolescents
were specifically more likely to loan allergy medications or are sharing acne medication, a class of pharmaceutical that
birth control. includes a well-known teratogen. Previous findings
regarding adolescents’ sharing of abusable prescription
medications are confirmed [7,8]. Participants reported
Borrowing prescription medications
frequently not providing or receiving instructions or warn-
Borrowing was similar to loaning: one in five (115 of 592, ings. Such omission increases risk for incorrect medication
19.4%) had borrowed prescription medication. Specific usage.
medication borrowing rates mirrored those for loaning. Three-fourths of participants borrowed to avoid a health-
Half the borrowers reported receiving written and/or verbal care provider visit. A third of these participants reported
instructions or warnings at least once. Nonnative English eventually visiting a provider because the borrowed medicine
speakers were half as likely to report receiving verbal instruc- did not resolve the initial problem. Avoided or deferred care
tions. Borrowing did not vary by gender or age, blacks were can lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment and potentially
more likely to borrow allergy medications, and those who increase sequelae, morbidity, and mortality. Patient disclo-
spoke a language other than English were less likely to report sure of medication borrowing was reported in less than
borrowing allergy medicines. 50% of the cases, indicating that providers may need to
specifically ask about borrowing. Finally, self-report of
Impact on care side-effects was surprisingly high (almost two of five
borrowers).
Seventy-four percent (74%) of borrowers reported doing All sites were urban and suburban, which limits generaliz-
so rather than making an appointment with a healthcare ability. Nonetheless, this is an improvement over previous
Table 1
Prevalence of medication sharing behaviors and related outcomes
Gender Age Race Home Lang
Base No.(%) Total Male Female 12-14 15-17 Caucasian Black Hispanic Other^ English Other
Base No.(%) 594 (100) 289 (100) 305 (100) 249 (100) 345 (100) 293 (100) 129 (100) 123 (100) 49 (100) 501 (100) 83 (100)
Loaning Behaviors
Have you previously loaned prescription medicine(s)? 122 (20.5) 60 (20.8) 62 (20.3) 53 (21.3) 69 (20.0) 46 (15.7) 39 (30.2)* 24 (19.5) 13 (26.5) 108 (21.6) 12 (14.5)
Which types of medicine have you loaned?
Allergy medications (like Zyrtec, Clarinex, 33 (27.1) 17 (28.3) 16 (25.8) 15 (28.3) 18 (26.1) 12 (26.1) 16 (41.0)* 3 (12.5) 2 (15.4) 32 (29.6) 1 (8.3)
Flonase, etc.)
Pain medications (like Darvoset, Oxycontin, etc.) 29 (23.8) 12 (20.0) 17 (27.4) 10 (18.9) 19 (27.5) 14 (30.4) 8 (20.5) 3 (12.5) 4 (30.7) 26 (24.1) 2 (16.7)

R.C. Goldsworthy and C.B. Mayhorn / Journal of Adolescent Health - (2009) 1–4
Mood medications (like Paxil, Zoloft, Valium, 10 (8.2) 5 (8.3) 5 (8.1) 5 (9.4) 5 (7.3) 4 (8.7) 4 (10.3) 1 (4.2) 1 (7.7) 9 (8.3) 1 (8.3)
Ritalin, etc.)
Antibiotics (like Amoxicillin, Doxycycline, 14 (11.5) 6 (10.0) 8 (12.9) 4 (7.6) 10 (14.5) 5 (10.9) 4 (10.3) 1 (4.2) 4 (30.7) 12 (11.1) 1 (8.3)
Bactrim/Spectra, etc.)
Acne Medication (like Accutane) 14 (11.5) 9 (15.0) 5 (8.1) 6 (11.3) 8 (11.6) 7 (15.2) 7 (17.9) 0 (0) 0 (0) 14 (13.0) 0 (0)
Birth control pills 9 (7.4) 4 (6.7) 5 (8.1) 2 (3.8) 7 (10.1) 2 (4.4) 5 (12.8) 2 (8.3) 0 (0) 9 (8.3) 0 (0)
Have you provided printed instructions or warnings 58 (47.5) 28 (46.7) 30 (48.4) 26 (49.1) 32 (46.4) 20 (43.5) 20 (51.3)* 10 (41.6) 8 (61.5) 51 (47.2) 6 (50.0)

ARTICLE IN PRESS
when loaning?
Have you provided verbal instructions or warnings 68 (55.7) 35 (58.3) 33 (53.2) 31 (58.5) 37 (53.6) 26 (56.5) 21 (53.8) 11 (45.8) 10 (76.9) 60 (55.6) 6 (50.0)
when loaning?
Borrowing Behaviors
Have you previous borrowed prescription medicine(s)? 115 (19.4) 58 (20.1) 57 (18.7) 44 (17.7) 71 (20.6) 52 (17.8) 29 (22.5) 24 (19.7) 10 (4.9) 103 (20.6) 10 (12.0)
Which types of medicine have you borrowed?
Allergy medications (like Zyrtec, Clarinex, 35 (30.4) 20 (34.5) 15 (26.3) 15 (34.1) 20 (28.2) 15 (28.9) 15 (51.7)* 1 (4.2) 4 (40.0) 34 (33.0)* 0 (0)
Flonase, etc.)
Pain medications (like Darvoset, Oxycontin, etc.) 31 (27.0) 16 (27.6) 15 (26.3) 8 (18.2) 23 (32.4) 15 (28.9) 9 (31.0) 5 (20.8) 2 (20.0) 27 (26.2) 3 (30.0)
Mood medications (like Paxil, Zoloft, Valium, 11 (9.6) 4 (6.9) 7 (12.3) 4 (9.1) 7 (9.9) 5 (9.6) 2 (6.9) 2 (8.3) 2 (20.0) 10 (9.7) 1 (10.0)
Ritalin, etc.)
Antibiotics (like Amoxicillin, Doxycycline, 15 (13.0) 6 (10.3) 9 (15.8) 4 (9.1) 11 (15.5) 8 (15.4) 5 (17.2) 1 (4.2) 1 (10.0) 13 (12.6) 1 (10.0)
Bactrim/Spectra, etc.)
Acne Medication (like Accutane) 17 (14.8) 10 (17.2) 7 (12.3) 4 (9.1) 13 (18.3) 11 (21.2) 4 (13.8) 1 (4.2) 1 (10.0) 17 (16.5) 0 (0)
Birth control pills 5 (4.3) 2 (3.5) 3 (5.3) 1 (2.3) 4 (5.6) 3 (5.8) 1 (3.5) 1 (4.2) 0 (0) 5 (4.9) 0 (0)
Have you been given printed instructions or warnings 55 (47.8) 30 (51.7) 25 (43.9) 18 (40.9) 37 (52.1) 27 (51.9) 13 (44.8) 10 (41.7) 5 (50.0) 48 (46.6) 5 (50.0)
when borrowing?
Have you been given verbal instructions or warnings 64 (55.6) 35 (60.3) 29 (50.9) 25 (56.8) 39 (54.9) 31 (59.6) 14 (48.3) 10 (41.7) 9 (90.0) 59 (57.3)* 3 (30.0)
when borrowing?
Have you ever borrowed instead of making an 86 (74.8) 45 (77.6) 41 (71.9) 36 (81.8) 50 (70.4) 35 (67.3) 29 (100)* 13 (54.2) 8 (80.0) 78 (75.7) 7 (70.0)
appointment with a healthcare provider?
Did you end up going to a healthcare provider after 23 (32.4) 8 (20.5) 15 (46.9)* 10 (35.7) 13 (30.2) 13 (48.1) 6 (24.0) 3 (25.0) 1 (12.5) 21 (32.8) 2 (33.3)
trying the borrowed medicine?
Did you NOT tell the healthcare provider about 28 (40.6) 14 (36.8) 14 (45.2) 7 (25.9) 21 (50.0)* 12 (46.2) 10 (40.0) 3 (25.0) 3 (37.5) 26 (41.9) 1 (16.7)
borrowing the medicine?
Have you ever had an allergic reaction or other side 43 (37.4) 18 (31.0) 25 (43.9) 24 (54.6) 19 (26.8) 14 (26.9) 14 (48.3) 10 (41.7) 5 (50.0) 33 (32.0) 8 (80.0)
effect when you borrowed?
As a result of multiple responses and omitted answers, values across categories do not always yield the same total.
* Value significantly greater than other values in the category, p < .01. ^ Because of small cell sizes, the Other category was omitted from comparisons.

3
ARTICLE IN PRESS

4 R.C. Goldsworthy and C.B. Mayhorn / Journal of Adolescent Health - (2009) 1–4

studies that have been limited to single geographic locations Richard Goldsworthy is Director of Research and Devel-
and often to single schools. Items were self-reported and are opment for the Academic Edge, Inc., a research group
subject to limitations, including social response bias. The specializing in healthcare communication and education.
likely impact is an underestimation of the actual prevalence Christopher B. Mayhorn is an associate professor in the
of sharing behaviors and outcomes. The study found a high Human Factors and Ergonomics Psychology Program at
rate of ‘‘allergic reactions or side effects’’; however, we are North Carolina State University.
not able to determine whether adolescents perceived these
as positive or negative (e.g., for certain classes of drugs,
the ‘‘side effect’’ may be exactly the effect they sought). References
Future research should consider adolescent definitions and [1] Goldsworthy RC, Schwartz NC, Mayhorn CB. Beyond abuse and
perceptions of ‘‘side effects’’ more closely. Such efforts exposure: framing the impact of prescription medication sharing. Am
should also examine reasons for and sources/recipients of J Public Health 2008;98(6):1115–21.
sharing. These are not directly addressed here and would [2] Petersen EE, Rasmussen SA, Daniel KL, et al. Prescription medication
provide important contextual information. borrowing and sharing among women of reproductive age. J Womens
Health 2008;17(7):1073–80.
Finally, efforts to reduce the prevalence and consequences [3] Mitchell AA. Prescription medication sharing. Am J Public Health
of adolescent medication sharing may be justified, including 2008;98(11):1926–7.
training providers to ask specifically about borrowed medica- [4] Boyd CJ, Esteban McCabe S, Teter CJ. Medical and nonmedical use of
tion and educating patients about proper use of prescriptions prescription pain medication by youth in a Detroit-area public school
and risks of sharing. Development of messaging related to district. Drug Alcohol Depend 2006;81(1):37–45.
[5] Daniel KL, Honein MA, Moore CA. Sharing prescription medication
sharing, for example, within product packaging or public among teenage girls: potential danger to unplanned/undiagnosed preg-
awareness campaigns, may merit further consideration. nancies. Pediatrics 2003;111(5 Pt. 2):1167–70.
[6] McCabe SE, Boyd CJ, Young A. Medical and nonmedical use of
prescription drugs among secondary school students. J Adolesc Health
Acknowledgments 2007;40(1):76–83.
[7] Poulin C. Medical and nonmedical stimulant use among adolescents:
The research discussed herein has been supported by grant from sanctioned to unsanctioned use. Can Med Assoc J 2001;
165(8):1039–44.
DD00001 to the first author from the National Center on
[8] Boyd CJ, McCabe SE, Cranford JA, et al. Prescription drug abuse and
Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD), diversion among adolescents in a southeast Michigan school district.
a part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161(3):276–81.
(CDC). The article’s contents are solely the responsibility [9] Wysowski DK, Swann J, Vega A. Use of isotretinoin (Accutane) in the
of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official United States: Rapid increase from 1992 through 2000. J Am Acad
Dermatol 2002;46(4):505–9.
views of NCBDDD/CDC. The research reported herein
[10] Goldsworthy RC, Kaplan B. Warning symbol development: A case
was approved, with a parental consent waiver, by the institu- study on teratogen symbol design and evaluation. In: Wogalter MS,
tional review board of the Academic Edge, Inc. (FWA ed. Handbook of Warnings. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum,
0000439). 2006:739–54.

Potrebbero piacerti anche