Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Wyatt Tenhaeff Milo Koretsky Department of Chemical Engineering Oregon State University koretsm@engr.orst.edu
Step 1 is a constant volume process. Therefore, no work is done. After neglecting potential and kinetic energy effects, the energy balance for a reversible process becomes
u = q du = q cv dT = q
Using the definition of entropy,
final
s sys ,step1 =
initial
q rev
T
T2
cv dT T T1
Step 2 is an isothermal process. For and ideal gas u is zero and the energy balance is (PE and KE neglected)
q = w dq = w
For an ideal gas, the following can be shown
wrev = Pdv =
Therefore,
final
RT dv v
s sys ,step 2 =
initial
qrev
T
v2
v1
v dv = R ln v
v2 1
s sys =
T1
v2 cv dT + R ln v T 1
s sys =
T1
cP
P2 dT R ln P 1
s sys =
T1
P2 A + BT + CT 2 dT R ln P T 1
P2 T2 C 2 2 ( ) B T T T T R ln + + s sys = A ln 2 1 2 1 P T 2 1 1
where
2 s 1 ) S sys = m( s
S surr =
Qsurr Tsurr
(300 C, 10 bar)
m3 1 = 0.25794 v kg m3 2 = 0.25794 v kg
(300 C, 10 bar)
To find the number of phases present in state 2, compare the specific volume of state 2 to the specific volume for saturated water and saturated water vapor at 1 bar. From the steam tables,
l , sat v, sat 2 2 < v 2 Since v , two phases are present. The quality of the water can be calculated as <v follows
l , sat v, sat 2 = (1 x )v 2 2 + xv v
Therefore,
x = 0.152
kJ 2 = 2.2231 s kg K
To find the change in entropy of the surroundings, an energy balance will be useful. Since no work is done, the energy balance is
U = Q
We also know
Qsurr = Q
To following expression is used to solve for the internal energy:
l , sat v, sat 2 1 U = m (1 x )u + xu 2 u
[(
) ]
kJ v, sat 2 u = 2506.1 kg
Therefore,
Q = 20583.77 [kJ ]
and
S surr = Qsurr 20583.77 [kJ ] kJ = = 70.25 Tsurr 293 [K ] K
kJ kJ kJ S univ = S sys + S surr = 49.0 + 70.25 = 21.25 K K K Since Suniv > 0, this process is possible.
Considering the copper block to be the system, no work is done on the system; thus, the energy balance is
du = q cv dT = q
s sys = s sys =
q rev
T cv dT
T1 T2 T1
Therefore,
T2
s sys =
T1
J s sys = 6.50 mol K 10 [kg ] J J 6.50 = 1024 S sys = kg mol K K 0.063465 mol
Since the temperature of the lake remains constant, the change in entropy of the surroundings can be calculated as follows
S surr = Qsurr nCu c P (T2 T1 ) 2.723nCu R(T2 T1 ) Q = = = Tsurr Tsurr Tsurr Tsurr
J (280 [K ] 373.15 [K ]) 8.314 2.723 10 [kg ] mol K S surr = kg 280 [K ] 0.063546 mol J S surr = 1184 K From the definition of entropy: J J J S univ = S sys + S surr = 1024 + 1184 = 160 K K K
liquid
S sys = n
vapor
qrev
T
n h Tb
vap
The sign is negative because there is less randomness in the liquid phase.
(c) For this situation
q = c P dT
Therefore,
S sys = m
Ti
Tf
q rev
T
J S sys = 23.6 K The sign is negative because as the water cools, less translational energy states are occupied by the molecules. Therefore, the randomness decreases.
(d) First, calculate the temperature at which the blocks (block A and block B) equilibrate. The energy balance for the process is
n Ac P (T2 373.15 K ) + n B c P (T2 473.15 K ) = 0
Since the heat capacities number of moles of A and B are equal, we find that
T2 = 423.15 K
T T S sys = n Ac P ln 2 + n B c P ln 2 T1, A T1, B Substituting values, we obtain J S sys = 0.337 K The sign is positive because two objects at different temperatures will spontaneously equilibrate to the same temperature when placed together.
10
3.6
The solution below compares problems 2.14 and 2.15, the calculation of 2.13 was erroneously included in the problem statement of the first printing and is shown at the end of this problem.
Problem 2.14 Since the system is well-insulated no heat is transferred with the surroundings. Therefore, the entropy change of the surroundings is zero and
S univ = S sys
The gas in the piston-cylinder system is ideal and c P is constant, so T2 P2 S sys = n c P ln T R ln P 1 1 From the problem statement, we know P 1 = 2 [bar ] P2 = 1 [bar ]
11
V2 =
nRT2 P2 PV T1 = 1 1 nR
Substituting these expressions into the energy balance, realizing that PE = P2 , and simplifying the equation gives 5 P2 + P 1 V1 2 T2 = 7 nR 2 Using the following values
P 1 = 2 [bar ] V1 = 10 [L] P2 = 1 [bar ]
results in
T2 = 206 [K ]
Since both states are constrained, the entropy can be calculated from Equation 3.63:
J 206 [K ] J 1 [bar ] S univ = S sys = (1.0 [mol]) 240.6 [K ] 8.314 mol K ln 3.5 8.314 mol K ln 2 [bar ] J Suniv = S sys = 1.24 K
12
Problem 2.15 Since the initial conditions in the piston-cylinder assembly are equal to the initial conditions of Problem 2.14, T1 and P 1 are known. Moreover, P2 is known, so we only need to find T2 in order to calculate the entropy change. For adiabatic, reversible processes, the following relationship (Equation 2.89) holds:
PV k = const
This can be used to find V2 .
1 P 1 k k V2 = P V1 2
TV k 1 = const. Therefore,
T2 = T1V1k 1
k 1 V2
J S univ = S sys = 0.004 K The value of the entropy shown represents round-off error. Since the process is reversible and adiabatic, we know from Table 3.1 and the related discussion in Section 3.3 that the entropy changes of the system, surroundings, and universe will be zero.
13
Problem 2.13
where the temperature of the surroundings is constant. First, we will determine s 2 . The first law can be applied to constrain state 2. With potential and kinetic energy effects neglected, the energy balance becomes U = Q + W The value of the work will be used to obtain the final temperature. The definition of work (Equation 2.7) is
W = PE dV
V1 V2
Since the piston expands at constant pressure, the above relationship becomes
W = PE (V2 V1 )
From the steam tables kJ 1 = 6.2119 s (10 MPa, 400 C) kg K m3 1 = 0.02641 v kg (10 MPa, 400 C)
[ ]
Now V2 and v2 are found as follows V2 = V1 748740 J W = 0.4536 m3 = 0.07923 m3 6 PE 2.0 10 Pa 3 m3 V2 0.4536 m v2 = = = 0.1512 m2 3 [kg ] kg
[ ]
[ ]
14
2 and P2 are known, state 2 is constrained. From the steam tables: Since v
kJ 2 = 7.1270 s kg K
3 20 bar, 0.1512 m kg
Now U will be evaluated, which is necessary for calculating Qsurr . From the steam tables:
kJ 2 = 2945.2 u kg 3 20 bar, 0.1512 m kg
kJ 1 = 2832.4 u kg
Substituting the values of U and W into the energy equation allows calculation of Q Q = U W Q = 338400 [J] ( 748740 [J ]) = 1.09 10 6 [J ] = Qsurr
so
2 s 1 ) + S univ = m( s Qsurr Tsurr
15
3.7 (a)
(c) First, we can find the molar volume of state 1 using the ideal gas law.
v1 =
16
3.8 (i). We wish to use the steam tables to calculate the entropy change of liquid water as it goes from its freezing point to its boiling point. The steam tables in Appendices B.1 B.5 do not have data for subcooled water at 1 atm. However, there is data for saturated water at 0.01 C and a pressure of 0.6113 kPa. If we believe that the entropy of water is weakly affected by pressure, then we can say that the entropy of water at 0.01 C and 0.6113 kPa is approximately equal to the entropy at 0 C and 1 atm. The molar volumes of most liquids do not change much with pressure at constant temperature. Thus, the molecular configurations over space available to the water molecules do not change, and the entropy essentially remains constant. We do not need to consider the molecular configurations over energy since the temperature difference is so slight. So, from the steam tables:
kJ (0 C , 1 atm ) s (0.01 C , 0.6113 kPa ) = 0 s kg K kJ (100 C , 1 atm ) = 1.3068 s kg K Therefore, kJ kJ =s (100 C , 1 atm ) s (0 C , 1 atm ) = 1.3068 s 0 kg K kg K kJ = 1.3068 s kg K (ii). From the steam tables: kJ l (100 C , 1 atm ) = 1.3068 s kg K kJ v (100 C , 1 atm ) = 7.3548 s kg K Therefore, kJ kJ =s v (100 C , 1 atm ) s l (100 C , 1 atm ) = 7.3548 s 1.3068 kg K kg K kJ = 6.048 s kg K The change in entropy for process (ii) is 4.63 times the change in entropy for process (i). There are many ways to reconcile this difference, but think about it from a molecular point of view. In process (i), the available molecular configurations over energy are increased as the temperature increases. As the temperature increases, the molar volume also increases slightly, so the 17
available molecular configurations over space also increase. Now consider process (ii), where the molecules are being vaporized and entering the vapor phase. The molecular configuration over space contribution to entropy is drastically increased in this process. In the liquid state, the molecules are linked to each other through intermolecular interactions and their motion is limited. In the vapor state, the molecules can move freely. Refer to Section 3.10 for a discussion of entropy from a molecular view.
18
3.9 Before calculating the change in entropy, we need to determine the final state of the system. Let the mixture of ice and water immediately after the ice has been added represent the system. Since the glass is adiabatic, no work is performed, and the potential and kinetic energies are neglected, the energy balance reduces
H = 0
We can split the system into two subsystems: the ice (subscript i) and the water (subscript w). Therefore, H = mi hi + mw hw = 0 and mi hi = mw hw
We can get the moles of water and ice. mw = Vw 0.0004 m 3 = = 0.399 [kg ] w v m3 0.001003 kg mw (0.399 [kg ]) = 22.15 [mol] = nw = (MW )H 2O 0.0180148 kg mol mi = 5.55 [mol] ni = (MW )H 2O
[ ]
Now, lets assume that all of the ice melts in the process. (If the final answer is greater than 0 C, the assumption is correct.) The following expression mathematically represents the change in internal energies (cP=cv). ni c P ,i (0 ( )10 C ) h fus + c P ,w (T f 0 C ) = nw c P ,w (T f 25 C ) Note: Assumed the heat capacities are independent of temperature to obtain this expression. From Appendix A.2.3 c P ,i = 4.196 R c P ,w = 9.069 R and kJ h fus = 6.0 mol
19
Substitution of values into the above energy balance allows calculation of Tf. T f = 3.12 C (Our assumption that all the ice melts is correct.) Now, we can calculate the change in entropy. From Equation 3.3 suniv = s sys + s surr Since the glass is considered adiabatic, s surr = 0 suniv = s sys We will again break the system into two subsystems: the ice and the water. The change in entropy of the universe can be calculated as follows S univ = ni si + nw s w The definition of change in entropy is
final
s =
initial
qrev T
Assuming the heat capacities of ice and water are independent of temperature, the expressions for the change in entropy of the subsystems are h fus 276.27 K 273.15 K + c P, w ln si = c P, i ln + 273.15 K 263.15 K 273.15 K 276.27 K s w = c P, w ln 298.15 K Therefore h fus 273.15 K 276.27 K 276.27 K S univ = ni c P, i ln + c P, w ln + + n w c P, w ln 263.15 K 273.15 K 273.15 K 298.15 K Substituting the values used before, we obtain
20
21
3.10 (a) The maximum amount of work is obtained in a reversible process. We also know the entropy change for the universe is zero for reversible processes. From the steam tables
Since the process is isothermal, we know that the temperature of the surroundings is constant at 400 C. Therefore,
Qsurr kJ = S surr = 1.1658 Tsurr K Qsurr = 784.76 [kJ ]
To find the work obtained, perform an energy balance. An energy balance where potential and kinetic energy effects are neglected is
U = Q + W
We can calculate the change in internal energy from the steam tables, and we also know that Q = Qsurr . From the steam tables: kJ 1 = 2832.4 u kg kJ 2 = 2967.8 u kg Therefore, (400 C, 100 bar) (400 C, 1 bar)
22
(b) If steam is modeled as an ideal gas, the change in internal energy is zero. Therefore, the energy balance is
Q = W The work can be found using Equation 2.77 which is developed for reversible, isothermal processes.
P2 W = nRT ln P 1 (0.5 [kg ]) 1 bar J (673.15 K )ln 8.3145 W= mol K 100 bar kg 0.0180148 mol W = 715332 [J ] = 715.3 [kJ ]
Therefore,
Q = 715.3 [kJ ]
and
23
P 1 = Psurr +
) = 24.6 105 Pa
) = 34.4 105 Pa
(b) The temperature should rise, which can be understood by considering an energy balance. Because the system is insulated, the work done by the mass being added to the piston is transformed into molecular kinetic energy. (c) The final temperature can be calculated with an energy balance:
U = W ncv (T2 T1 ) = W
Since the pressure of the surroundings is constant after the block is added to the piston, the work is calculated as follows:
W = P2 (V2 V1 )
24
25
3.12 (a) To calculate ssys, we need to take the gas from state 1 to state 2 using a reversible process. The process in part a can be drawn as follows:
24.6 bar 500 K rev. adiabatic 34.4 bar 557 K
State 1
PI T I = 557 K State I
We need to find the intermediate pressure, PI where we end up at the temperature in state 2, T2. To find it, we can use the results from pages 78-79 of the text:
(1 k ) / k T1P = TI PI(1 k ) / k = T2 PI(1 k ) / k 1
(I)
1 20 490 T 560
26
For the reversible adiabatic process, the change in entropy is zero. Therefore,
s sys = sisothermal
q rev = wrev =
Therefore,
final
RT dP P
s sys =
initial
q
T
=
PI
P2
P2 R J = 0.354 dP = R ln P mol K PI
If we substitute relation (I) in the expression above, we get the same expression in the book:
P2 s sys = R ln P 1 T2 T2 P2 k + (1 k ) R ln T = c P ln T R ln P 1 1 1
(b) For this construction, we use the path diagrammed on the following PT diagram:
40 P
2 Isothermal compression
We write
27
q rev = dh = c P dT
Therefore,
T2
sisobar =
T1
2 TP dT = c P ln T 1
sisothermal =
v I = RT2 / P1
P dv = T
v 2 = RT2 / P2 v1 = RT2 / P1
P P2 R 1 dv = R ln = R ln P v P 2 1
(c) For this construction, we use the path diagrammed on the following PT diagram:
28
40 P
1 20 490 T 560
For isochoric heating followed by an isothermal expansion, the entropy can be expressed as follows:
s sys = sisochoric + sisothermal
For the reversible, isothermal expansion, we obtain (refer to Parts (a) and (b) to see how this is derived)
P2 sisothermal = R ln P I However, we can relate the intermediate pressure to the initial pressure through the ideal gas law:
PI P = 1 T2 T1
or
PI = 27.4 [bar]
P2 T2 P2 P2 sisothermal = R ln = R ln R ln P = R ln T P T1 2 P 1 I 1 T1
q rev = cv dT
Therefore,
29
T2
sisochoric =
T1
2 T dT = cv ln T 1
cv
Using any of these three reversible paths, we get the same answer!
30
3.13 (a) Since the process is reversible and adiabatic, the entropy change for the process is zero.
s sys = 0
Furthermore, since the process is adiabatic, the changes in entropy of the surroundings and the universe are also zero.
(b) Since this process is isentropic (s=0), we can apply an expression for the entropy change of an ideal gas.
T2 c P s = 0 = P dT R ln 2 P1 T T
1
s = 0 = R
T2
w = u = cv dT =
T1
T2
T2
T1
(c
1)dT
31
(d) Reversible processes represent the situation where the minimum amount of energy is required for compression. If the process were irreversible, more work is required, and since the process is adiabatic, the change in internal energy is greater. Since the change in internal energy is greater, so too is the change in temperature. Therefore, the final temperature would be higher than the temperature calculated in Part (b).
32
3.14 The problem statement states that the vessel is insulated, so we can assume that heat transfer to the surroundings is negligible. Therefore, the expression for the entropy change of the universe is
suniv = s sys
An energy balance will help us solve for the entropy change. Neglecting potential and kinetic energy effects, the energy balance is
U = Q + W
Since the vessel is insulated, the heat term is zero. Furthermore, no work is done, so the energy balance is
2 u 1 ) = 0 U = m(u u1 = u 2
The values for the initial pressure and temperature constrain the value of specific energy at state 1. From the steam tables,
kJ 1 = 2619.2 u kg kJ 2 = 2619.2 u kg
The problem statement provides the pressure of state 2 (100 bar). Since we know the pressure and internal energy at state 2, the entropy is constrained. Information given in the problem statement also constrains state 1. From the steam tables,
kJ 1 = 5.5539 s kg K kJ 2 = 5.7754 s kg K
Therefore,
33
3.15 The subscript 2 refers to the final state of the system. 1 refers to the gas initially on one side of the partition. If you take the system to be the entire tank (both sides of the partition), then no net work is performed as the gas leaks through the hole. Furthermore, the tank is well insulated, and kinetic and potential energy effects can be neglected. Thus, the energy balance is
u = 0
and
T2 = T1
(ideal gas)
Initially, the partition is divided into two equal parts. The gas fills the entire volume for the final state ( V2 = 2V1 ). The ideal gas law can be used to calculate the moles of gas present.
n=
P1V1 (10 105 [Pa ])(0.5 m 3 ) = 200.5 mol = RT1 J (300 [K ]) 8.314 mol K
[ ]
Now, the change in entropy can be solved using a slight modification of Equation 3.65:
3 nv 2 T2 v 2 T2 R n R R ln ln ln + = + S sys = n cv ln nv T v T 2 1 1 1 1 J 3 S sys = (200.5 mol) 2 ln(1) + ln(2) 8.314 mol K J S sys = 1155 K
34
N2 N2 N2 N2
N2 N2
O2
Mixing Process
N2
N2 O2
N2
N2 N2 N2 O2 O2
N2 N2 N2
N2
The tank is insulated. The change in entropy of the universe can be rewritten as
S univ = S sys, N 2 + S sys, O2
since the tank is well-insulated. After the partition ruptures, the pressure and temperature will remain constant at 1 bar and 298 K, respectively. This can be shown by employing mass and energy balances. Therefore, the partial pressures in the system are
s sys, N 2 =
s sys, O2 =
35
J S univ = 4.27 K
(b) A schematic of the process is shown below:
2 bar, 298 K 1 bar, 298 K P2, T 2
N2
N2 N2 N2
N2 N2
N2 N2 N2 O2
Mixing Process
N2
N2 N2
N2 N2
N2 N2
N2 N2 O2 N2
N2 N2
N2 N2 N2
N2 N2
O2
N2
O2 N2
N2 N2 N2
N2
Before calculating the change in entropy, we need to find how the temperature and pressure change during the process. The energy balance simplifies to
U = 0
(nO
We can find the pressure after the rupture by recognizing that the tank is rigid. Therefore,
VO2 + V N 2 = Vtot
By employing the ideal gas law, we get the following equation (it has been simplified):
nN 2 P 1, N 2
nO2 P 1, O2
(nO
+ nN 2 P2
Now, use Equation 3.62 to calculate the entropies as was done in Part (a):
36
298 K
s sys, N 2 =
ssys ,O2 =
J s sys ,O2 = 8.8 mol K Therefore, J J S univ = (0.79 mol) + (0.21mol) 3.58 mol K 8.8 mol K J Suniv = 4.68 K
37
3.17 First start with the energy balance for the throttle. Potential and kinetic energy effects can be neglected. During the throttling process, no shaft work is performed and the rate of heat transfer is negligible. Therefore,
=m & 2h & 1h m 2 1
A mass balance allows the energy balance to be simplified to =h h 2 1 From the steam tables: = 3398.3 kJ h 1 kg = 3398.3 kJ h 2 kg Now calculate entropy:
univ = s sys + s surr s
(500 C, 8 MPa)
Since the process is adiabatic, kJ surr = 0 s kg K The steam tables can be used to calculate the change in entropy of the system. kJ 2 = 8.7098 s kg K kJ 1 = 6.7239 s kg K Thus, kJ univ = s sys = s 2 s 1 = 1.9859 s kg K
= 3398.3 kJ 100 kPa, h 2 kg
(8 MPa, 500 C)
38
3.18 For this process to work, conservation of mass and the first and second laws of thermodynamics must hold. The subscript 1 refers to the inlet stream, 2 refers to the cold outlet, and 3 refers to the hot outlet. To test the conservation of mass, perform a mass balance &1 = m &2 +m &3 m
kg kg kg 2 = 0.5 + 1.5 s s s Clearly, the conservation of mass holds. Now test the first law of thermodynamics by writing an energy balance. Since there is no heat transfer or work, the energy balance becomes
+m m & 2h & 3h m 2 3 & 1h1 = 0
Using the conservation of mass we can rewrite the mass flow rate of stream 1 in terms of streams 2 and 3:
h +m h =0 &2 h &3 h m 2 1 3 1
If we assume that the heat capacity of the ideal gas is constant, the equation can be written as follows:
& 2c & 3c P (T2 T1 ) + m P (T3 T1 ) = 0 m
Therefore, kg kg cP (20 K) = 0 0.5 c P ( 60 K) + 1.5 s s This proves that the first law holds for this system. For the second law to be valid, the rate of change in entropy of the universe must greater than or equal to 0, i.e., dS 0 dt univ Assuming the process is adiabatic, we can write the rate of entropy change of the universe for this steady-state process using Equations 3.48-3.50:
dS & 2s 2 + m & 3s 3 m & 1s 1 = m & 2 (s 2 s 1 ) + m & 3 (s 3 s 1 ) =m dt univ
39
where a mass balance was used. For constant heat capacity, we can calculate the entropy differences using Equation 3.63: 5 T2 P2 P2 T2 s2 s1 = cP ln ln P = R 2 ln T R ln P T 1 1 1 1 5 T3 P3 P3 T3 s3 s1 = cP ln ln P = R 2 ln T R ln P T 1 1 1 1 Applying these relations, we get:
1 dS (2.77 R 0.057cP ) = dt univ MW
Therefore, the second law holds if cP 48.6 R ; this value is far in excess of heat capacity for gases, so this process is possible.
40
3.19 (a)
T1 = 640 oC P1 = 4 MPa V1= 20 m/s Nozzle P2 = 100 kPa V2=?
J S sys = 0 K
(c) The steam tables can be used to determine the final temperature. From the interpolation of steam table data
kJ 2 = s 1 (640 C, 4 MPa ) = 7.4692 s kg K Now two thermodynamic properties are known for state 2. From the steam tables:
T2 = 121.4 C
kJ P2 = 0.1 MPa, s = 7 . 4692 2 kg K
(d) An energy balance is required to calculate the exit velocity. The energy balance for the nozzle is
+e K ,2 = h K 1 h e 2 which is equivalent to
r r + 0.5V 2 h V2 = 2 h 2 1
[(
41
r m V1 = 20 s
r m V2 = 1448 s
Note: the velocity obtained is supersonic; however, the solution does not account for this type of flow.
42
Turbine
Since this process is isentropic (s=0), we can apply an expression for the entropy change of an ideal gas. We must be careful, however, to select an expression which does not assume a constant heat capacity.
T2 c P s = 0 = P dT R ln 2 P1 T T
1
We can also relate P1 to T1 and v1 (which are known) through the ideal gas law: P1 = RT1 v1
43
To solve for
& W S we need a first law balance, with negligible ke and pe, the 1st law for a steady & n
integrating:
)]
results in
& W S = 19860 J & n mol
44
3.21 A reversible process will require the minimum amount of work. For a reversible process,
where
sO2 =
T2 (c
P )O2
T1
T
P )N 2
P2 dT R ln P 1
O2
s N 2 =
T2 (c
T1
P2 dT R ln P 1
N2
Since the temperature of the streams do not change, the expressions reduce to
P2 sO2 = R ln P 1 O2 P2 s N 2 = R ln P 1 N2
Therefore,
s surr = R ln P2 P1 P2 + ln P O2 1 N2
Since we are assuming the temperature of the surroundings remain constant at 20 C, q s surr = surr Tsurr where
qsurr = q
45
Therefore,
P P2 2 q surr = Tsurr s surr = RTsurr ln + ln P P 1 O2 1 N2 1 bar J 1 bar ( ) + q surr = 8 . 314 293 . 15 K ln ln 0.21 bar O 0.79 bar N mol K 2 2 J q surr = 4378.2 mol
and
J q = 4378.2 mol
Energy Balance:
& n
in
in in
Because the temperature of the oxygen and nitrogen doesnt change in the process, the energy balance per mole of feed becomes wS = q
J wS = 4378.2 mol
46
3.22 (a) Take the entire container to be the system and assume no heat or work crosses the system boundary.
Energy Balance:
U = 0
After the oscillation cease, the temperature and pressure on both sides of the piston will be the same assuming the metallic piston is very thin and the thermal conductivity coefficient is large. Now, lets rewrite the energy balance.
T2 = 585 K
Mass Balance: n A,1 + n B,1 = n A,2 + n B,2 Using the ideal gas law, we get
47
PA,1VA,1 PB ,1VB ,1 PA, 2VA, 2 PB , 2VB , 2 P2Vtot + = + = RTA,1 RTB ,1 RTA, 2 RTB , 2 RT2 since the pressure and temperature of state 2 are equal on both sides. But Vtot = V A,1 + VB,1 = 3V A,1 Using the volume relationships and simplifying, we get P2 = P 2P T2 A,1 + B ,1 = 585 [K ] 10 [bar ] + 2 1 [bar ] 3 TA,1 TB ,1 3 773.15 [K ] 373.15 [K ]
P2 = 3.56 [bar ]
The entropy change of the system can be split into two subsystems:
ssys =
sgas A =
sgas B
Therefore,
48
3.23
Lets first calculate S sys . Before this problem is solved, a few words must be said about the notation used. The system was initially broken up into two parts: the constant volume container and the constant pressure piston-cylinder assembly. The subscript 1 refers to the constant volume container; 2 refers the piston-cylinder assembly. i" denotes the initial state before the valve is opened, and f denotes the final state. First, the mass of water present in each part of the system will be calculated. The mass will be conserved during the expansion process. Since the water in the rigid tank is saturated and is in equilibrium with the constant temperature surroundings (200 C), the waters entropy is constrained. From the steam tables,
kJ l 1 v , i = 0.001156 kg kJ v 1 v , i = 0.12736 kg kJ l 1 s , i = 2.3308 kg kJ v 1 s , i = 6.4322 kg P sat = 1553.8 [kPa ] Knowledge of the quality of the water and the overall volume of the rigid container can be used to calculate the mass present in the container.
l v 1 1 V1 = 0.05m1 v , i + 0.95m1 v ,i
( )
( )
Using the values from the steam table and V1 = 0.5 m 3 provides
m1 = 4.13 [kg ]
[ ]
49
For the piston-cylinder assembly, both P and T are known. From the steam tables
m3 2, i = 0.35202 v kg kJ 2, i = 6.9665 s kg K
Now enough information is available to calculate the mass of water in the piston assembly. V m2 = 2 = 0.284 [kg ] 2 v Now the final state of the system must be determined. It helps to consider what physically happens when the valve is opened. The initial pressure of the rigid tank is 1553.8 kPa. When the valve is opened, the water will rush out of the rigid tank and into the cylinder until equilibrium is reached. Since the pressure of the surroundings is constant at 600 kPa and the surroundings represent a large temperature bath at 200 C, the final temperature and pressure of the entire system will match the surroundings. In other words, kJ f = s 2, i = 6.9665 s kg Thus, the change in entropy is given by
v l v v l l S sys = (m2 + m1 , i + m1, i ) s f m2 s 2, i m1, i s1, i m1, i s1, i
Substituting the appropriate values reveals kJ S sys = 3.05 K Now we calculate the change in entropy of the surroundings. Since the temperature of the surroundings is constant,
S surr = Qsurr Q = Tsurr Tsurr
After neglecting potential and kinetic energy effects, the energy balance becomes 50
U = Q + W The change in internal energy and work will be calculated in order to solve for Q. The following equation shows how the change in internal energy can be calculated.
v l v v l l U = (m2 + m1 , i + m1, i )u f m2 u 2, i m1, i u1, i m1, i u1, i
kJ f =u 2, i = 2638.9 u kg
Calculating the work is relatively easy since the gas is expanding against a constant pressure of 600 kPa (weight of the piston was assumed negligible). From Equation 2.7, W = PE dV = PE (V f Vi )
Vi Vf
where
PE = 600000 [Pa ] Vi = 0.1 m 3 + 0.5 m 3 = 0.6 m 3
[ ] [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
2, i was used to calculate V f because the temperature and pressure are the same Note: v for the final state of the entire system and the initial state of the piston-cylinder assembly. The value of W can now be evaluated.
W = 570 [kJ ]
51
Therefore, S surr = and kJ kJ kJ Suniv = S sys + S surr = 3.05 2.35 = 0.70 K K K 1111 [kJ ] kJ = 2.35 473.15 [K ] K
52
3.24 Let the subscript 1 represent the state of the system before the partition is removed. It has two components: component a and component b. Subscript 2 represents the system after the partition is removed.
Mass balance: n1, a + n1, b = n2 Energy balance for the adiabatic process:
U sys = W
)]
The external pressure, P, for the above energy balance is equal to P1,a. To find the final temperature, first find the volumes using the ideal gas law. (2 [mol]) 8.314 J (300 K ) mol K = 0.05 m 3 (1000 [kg ]) 9.8 m s - 2 0.098 m 2
V1, a =
( [ ]) [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
V2 =
(4 [mol]) 8.314
( [ ]) [ ]
Substitute the volumes into the energy balance and solve for T2 : 3 3 (2 mol) 1 105 Pa )[3.3256 10 4 T2 0.15 m 3 ] R (T2 300 K ) + (2 mol) R (T2 300 K ) = ( 2
2 T2 = 360.4 K
The only unknown in the above equation is P1,b, so we can calculate it with the ideal gas law:
53
P 1, b =
(2 mol) 8.314
J (300 K ) mol K
3
= 0.5 10 5 Pa
0 .1 m
J S sys = 3.72 K
54
The change in internal energy can be written: U = n A, f u A, f + nB , f u B , f n A,i u A mass balance gives: n A,i = n A , f + nB , f These two expressions can be substituted to give: U = n A, f cv (TA, f Ti ) + nB , f cv (TB , f Ti ) = W Using the ideal gas law and cv =
Integrating
2 W = 1.06 105VB, f 4.142 105VB ,f
Substituting this expression into the energy balance gives: 5 5 5 2 PB, f VB, f + PA, f V A, f PA,iV A, i = 1.06 105VB, f 4.142 105VB ,f 2 2 2
55
This expression can be simplified by recognizing that PB, f = PA, f and V A, f = V A, i : 5 5 2 PB, f VB, f + V A, i PA, iV A, i = 1.06 105VB, f 4.142 105VB ,f 2 2 We still have two unknowns: PB, f and VB, f . We can eliminate PB, f by writing a force balance for the final state:
PB, f = 1.06 105 + 8.284 105VB, f [Pa ]
Substituting this into the energy balance, we obtain 5 5 2 1.06 105 + 8.284 105VB, f VB, f + V A, i PA, iV A, i = 1.06 105VB, f 4.142 105VB ,f 2 2 Solving for the final volume:
VB, f = 0.268 m 3
)(
Therefore,
T2 P2 0 = c P ln T R ln P 1 1 3.28 10 5 Pa J 7 T2 0= 8.314 mol K 2 ln 313.15 K ln 5 7.0 10 Pa
56
Turbine
Steam out Tsurr=300 K P2 = 10 bar
(a) and (b) The maximum work occurs for a reversible process. Applying the second law, we get:
or 2 s 1 ) + & (s m
so 2 = s 1 s
2 and P2) From the steam tables: We now know two properties of steam ( s
T2 = 200 oC
Using the steam tables for superheated steam at 1 MPa, we find that when water has this value of entropy
57
Calculate Ws:
kJ kJ h Q & = (1.25 kg/s ) & =m 2827.9 3422.1 ( )69.86 [kW ] & h W s 2 1 kg kg & = 673 [kW ] W s
(d) The real temperature should be higher since not as much energy is converted into work. (e) Use the energy balance:
h =Q & +W & & h m 2 1 s & & = Q + Ws + h = 69.86 kW + -447.5 kW + 3422.1 kJ = 3008.2 kJ h 2 1 kg kg & 1.25 kg/s m
58
3.27 Since the compressor is adiabatic, the energy balance after neglecting potential and kinetic energy becomes
gives
& ) (W
& ) & (W S reversible = (WS )compressor compressor = (0.8)(218.8 [kW ]) & ) (W S reversible = 175.4 [kW ]
compressor
Since the process is adiabatic, we can use the following equation again to calculate what the final temperature would be in a reversible process.
& T2 P V 1 1 & WS = A + BT + CT 2 + DT 2 + ET 3 dT T1
T1
59
& PV 175400 [W ] = 1 1 T1
T2 T1
(A + BT + CT
+ DT 2 + ET 3 dT
To obtain the pressure the final pressure for the real compressor, we can calculate the final pressure for the reversible process because the final pressure is the same in both cases. For the isentropic expansion
T2
s = 0 =
P2 dT R ln P T 1 T1
cp
A + BT + CT 2 + DT 2 + ET 3 P2 s = 0 = R dT R ln P T 1 T1
T2
60
If the rate of heat transfer is assumed negligible, the energy balance for this process is
h +W & & h 0=m 1 2 s
61
The exit temperature is calculated by determining the enthalpy of the actual exit state: & ) ( W kJ S actual h2, actual = h1 + = 2538.4 &1 m kg This state is still saturated (although the quality is higher), so the temperature is T2 = 99.6 oC
62
3.29 The subscripts 2 and 3 represent the two outline streams, and 1 represents the inlet stream. First, perform a mass balance:
2 1 &1 + n &1 n 3 3
Since the system is insulated and there is no shaft work, the energy balance can be rewritten as: 2 1 &1h2 + n &1h3 n &1h1 = 0 n 3 3 2 (h2 h1 ) + 1 (h3 h1 ) = 0 3 3 Substituting expressions for heat capacity A.2.2, we obtain the following expression:
3 4000 1 4000 3 3.280 + 0.593 10 T + dT + R 3.280 + 0.593 10 3 T + dT = 0 2 2 3 T T 300 K 300 K Solving, we find
2 R 3
400 K
T3 = 100.6 K Now set up an entropy balance for the process. The minimum pressure is required for a reversible process.
2 1 &1s2 + n &1s3 n &1s1 = 0 n 3 3 2 (s2 s1 ) + 1 (s3 s1 ) = 0 3 3 Assuming ideal gas behavior, we can express the changes in entropies using Equation 3.62:
400 K 3.280 1bar 4000 ln s 2 s1 = R dT + 0.593 10 3 + P 3 T T 1 300 K 100.6 K 3.280 1bar 4000 ln s3 s1 = R dT + 0.593 10 3 + P 3 T T 1 300 K
63
Substitute these expressions into the entropy balance and solve for P1:
P 1 = 1.85 bar
64
reversible
P2 = 20 bar T 2 = ? oC m = 5 kg
well-insulated
(b) We can obtain the final temperature using the steam tables.
kJ 1 = 6.999 s kg K kJ 2 = 6.999 s kg K
The pressure and entropy of state 2 can be used to back out T2 from the steam tables.
T2 = 362.5 C
(c) To obtain the value of work, perform an energy balance. The process is adiabatic, and potential and kinetic energy effects can be neglected. Therefore, the energy balance is
2 u 1 ) = W U = m(u
(362.5 C, 20 bar)
65
kJ 1 = 3156.12 u kg
(540 C, 60 bar)
Hence,
kJ kJ W = (5 [kg ]) 2881 . 15 3156 . 12 kg = 1373 [kJ ] kg
m3 2 = 0.14173 v kg
Therefore,
m3 3 V2 = (5 [kg ]) 0.14173 = 0.709 m kg
[ ]
66
well-insulated
In order to leave the system, the gas must do flow work on the surroundings. The initial state is the same as for Problem 3.30 and the final pressures are the same. Since the water only expands against 1 bar, the work is lower than that for the differential process described in Problem 3.30. Thus, this adiabatic process looses less energy, leading to a higher final temperature. Another way to view this argument is to look at this process as a closed system. This depiction is the expansion analog of the compression process depicted for Example 2.5 in Figure E2.5B (page 57). We can represent this process in terms of two latches, one that keeps the process in its initial state at 60 bar and one that stops the expansion after the pressure has reduced to 20 bar. The process is initiated by removal of the first latch and ends when the piston comes to rest against the second latch. Such a process is depicted as Problem 3.31 below. The corresponding reversible process of Problem 3.30 is shown next to it for comparison. Clearly the process on the left does less work, resulting in a greater final temperature.
Problem 3.31
T surr = 25 oC Psurr = 1 bar latches Pure H2O P1 = 60 bar T1 = 540 oC m = 5 kg irreversible Pure H2O P2 = 20 bar T ' 2 = ? oC m = 5 kg
Pure H2O P1 = 60 bar T1 = 540 oC m = 5 kg
Problem 3.30
Tsurr = 25 oC Psurr = 1 bar Pure H 2O P2 = 20 bar T 2 = ? oC m = 5 kg
reversible
well-insulated
67
Mass balance
dm & in m & out = m & in =m dt
m1
& in dt dm = m
0
or
& in dt m2 m1 = m
0 t
Energy balance Since the potential and kinetic energy effects can be neglected, the open system, unsteady state energy balance is
dU & +W & & out hout m & in hin + Q = m s dt sys out in
The process is adiabatic and no shaft work is done. Furthermore, there is only one inlet stream and not outlet stream. Therefore, the energy balance simplifies to
dU & in hin =m dt sys
U1 =0
& dU = m
0
in in
& in dt h dt = hin m
0
68
Now the water in the tank is constrained. From the steam tables:
kJ 2 = 7.743 s kg K m 2 = 0.14749 v kg
3
kJ 3 MPa, u 2 = 3456.5 kg
(3 MPa, 773 K)
Therefore,
0.05 m 3 kJ kJ kJ 7.743 = 0.173 7.2337 S univ = m 3 K kg K kg K 0.14749 kg
(b) If it tank sits in storage for a long time and equilibrates to a final temperature of 20 C, some or all of the vapor will condense and exchange heat with the surroundings. Let the subscript 3 designate the final state of the water when it has reached a temperature of 20 C. The change in entropy between state 2 and state 3 is given by the following equation
69
3 s 2 ) + S univ = m2 (s
Qsurr T
Let the subscript 3 designate the final state of the water when it has reached a temperature of 20 C. First, find quality of the water. From the steam tables:
m3 sat v3, l = 0.001002 kg m3 sat 3 v = 57 . 79 ,v kg
(sat. water at 20 C)
Now calculate the amount of heat transferred to the surroundings: 3 u 2 ) Q surr = Q = m2 (u Calculate the internal energy of state 3:
sat 3 = (1 x )u 3 sat u ,l + xu 3,v
kJ 3 = 89.74 u kg
Therefore,
0.05 m 3 kJ kJ 89.74 3456.5 = 1141 [kJ ] Q surr = m 3 kg kg 0 . 14749 kg
S univ
S univ
The entropy change for both processes can be fount by adding together the entropy change from Part (a) and Part (b): kJ (S univ )(a) and (b) = 1.55
K
71
Mass balance
dm & in m & out = m & out =m dt
m1
& dm = m
0
out
dt
or
& out dt m2 m1 = m
0 t
Entropy Balance: & & dS Q Q dS surr & = & & S + + = + m s m s univ out out out out Tsurr dt sys Tsurr dt sys Integrating with sout constant
Suniv = m2 s2 m1s1 (m2 m1 )sout Q Tsurr
(1)
72
kJ s1 = (1 x)u f + xu g = 0.6 2.3309 + 0.4 6.4323 = 3.9715 kg K kJ kJ s 2 = 6.4323 is the same as sout = 6.4323 = s2 kg K kg K
(2)
Integrating
2 m2 u
1 m1u
dU = [
t
0
[ ]
V and m2 = 2 = v2
[ ]
73
and
kJ hout = 2793.2 kg
Plugging in:
= 228 [kJ ] 2 m1u 1 (m2 m1 )h Q = m2u out
74
V1 = 1 m3 P1 = 10 bar T1 = 1000 K
V2 = 10 m3 P2 = ? T2 = ?
State 2
The maximum work is given by a reversible process. Since it is also adiabatic, the entropy change of the system is zero:
T P s = 0 = cP ln 2 R ln 2 T1 P1 5 Since cP = R 2 T2 T 1
5/ 2
P2 nRT2 = P1 V2 P 1
= 215 K
75
3.35 The maximum efficiency is obtained from a Carnot cycle. From Equation 3.32
T n = 1 C TH
76
3.36 The labeling described in Figure 3.8 will be used for this solution. First, a summary of known variables is provided.
State 1 2 3 4
P (bar) 30 0.1
T (C) 500
From our knowledge of ideal Rankine cycles, the table can be expanded as follows State 1 2 3 4 Thermodynamic State Superheated Steam Sat. Liq. and Vapor Sat. Liquid Subcooled Liquid P (bar) 30 0.1 0.1 30 T (C) 500
The saturation condition constrains state 3. First, start with the turbine. Since the rate of heat transfer is negligible and the expansion occurs reversibly in an ideal Rankine cycle, the following is known
1 = s 2 s
and
kJ 1 = 7.2337 s kg K kJ l 2 = 0.6492 s kg K
kg K = 3456.5 kJ h 1 kg l = 191.81 kJ h 2 kg v h 2 kJ = 2584.6 kg kJ v 2 s = 8.1501
(500 C, 30 bar)
(500 C, 30 bar)
77
Substituting the steam table data and the quality calculated above, we get = 2292.7 kJ h 2 kg Therefore,
kJ kJ kg & = W 2292.7 3456.5 s 100 s = 116.38 [MW ] kg kg
At state 3,
= 191.81 kJ h kg 3 m3 v3 = 0.001010 kg
Therefore, h = 210.09 [MW ] & =m & h Q C 3 2 Since the molar volume of water does not change noticeably with pressure and the compressor is adiabatic, the work required for compressing the fluid can be calculated as follows
& =m &v 3 (P4 P3 ) W c
m3 & = 100 kg W 0 . 00101 30 105 0.1 105 [Pa ] = 3.02 10 5 [W ] = 0.302 [MW ] c kg s
78
Now we find the rate of heat transfer for the evaporator. For the entire Rankine cycle, Equation 3.84 gives
& +W & +Q & +W & =Q & +W & =0 Q net net C H s C
We have
& = W & & W & Q Q H s C C
Equation 3.84:
& =W & W & W net S C & Wnet = 116.08 [MW ]
& W
116.08 [MW ]
79
3.37 To make the Rankine cycle more efficient, we need to increase the area that represents the net work in Figure 3.8. This can be done in a variety of ways:
1. Increase the degree of superheating of steam in the boiler. This process is sketched in the upper left hand Ts diagram below. This change reduces the moisture content of steam leaving the turbine. This effect is desirable since it will prolong the life of the turbine; however, if the steam is heated too high, materials limitations of the turbine may need to be considered. 2. Lower the condenser pressure. Lowering the pressure in the condenser will lower the corresponding saturation temperature. This change will enlarge the area on the Ts diagram, as shown on the upper right below. Thus, we may want to consider lowering the pressure below atmospheric pressure. We can achieve this since the fluid operates in a closed loop. However, we are limited by the low temperature off the heat sink that is available.
increase the superheating of steam in the boiler lower the condenser pressure
1new
T 1
wnet
2new s
wnet 4
wnet 4
80
3. Increase the boiler pressure. This will increase the boiler temperature which will increase the area as shown on the bottom left Ts diagram. 4. We can be more creative about how we use the energy available in the boiler. One way is to divide the turbine into two stages, Turbine 1 and Turbine 2, and reheat the water in the boiler between the two stages. This process is illustrated below.
Rankine cycle with reheat W s turbine 1 2 4 QH Boiler 6 5 Wc compressor condenser 3 QC
cooling water
Ws Turbine 2
1
Fuel Air
The pressure in Turbine 1 will be higher than the pressure in turbine 2. This process is schematically shown on the bottom right Ts diagram. This process leads to less moisture content at the turbine exit (desirable) and limits the temperature of the superheat (desirable).
81
3.38 The labeling described in Figure 3.8 will be used for this solution. First, a summary of known variables is provided.
State 1 2 3 4
P (bar) 100 1
T (C) 500
From our knowledge of ideal Rankine cycles, the table can be expanded as follows
State 1 2 3 4
Thermodynamic State Superheated Steam Sat. Liq. and Vapor Sat. Liquid Subcooled Liquid
T (C) 500
The saturation condition constrains state 3. First start with the turbine (state 2). Since the rate of heat transfer is negligible and the expansion occurs reversibly in an ideal Rankine cycle, the following is known
1 = s 2 s
kJ = 7.3593 kg K
82
States 1, 2, and 3 are constrained; therefore, the enthalpies can be determined using the steam tables. The enthalpy of state 4 can be calculated from Equation 3.80: =h +v h 4 3 l (P4 P3 )
m3 where vl = v3 = 0.001043 since specific volume of liquids are insensitive to pressure kg changes. From the steam tables:
State
kJ 2391.0 kg
kJ 417.44 kg
kJ 427.8 kg
Equation 3.84:
) (
) [(
) (
)]
and
&= m
[(h1 h4 )+ (h3 h2 )]
& W net
kg & = 116.3 m s
Now consider the non-ideal turbine and compressor. Use the definition of isentropic efficiencies:
& ) ( W s turbine = & actual (Ws )reversible h ) & ) & & )(h (W 2 1 reversible S actual = turbine (WS )reversible = turbine (m
83
compressor =
& ) (W C actual
compressor
compressor
Substituting the enthalpy values from the table shown above and the efficiency values gives
kg & = 147 m s
A higher flow rate is needed as compared to the reversible process.
84
3.39 The labeling shown in Figure 3.8 will be used for this solution. First, a summary of known variables is provided.
State 1 2 3 4
From our knowledge of ideal Rankine cycles, the table can be expanded as follows State 1 2 3 4 Thermodynamic State Sat. Vapor Sat. Liq. And Vapor Sat. Liquid Subcooled Liquid P (MPa) 1.7 0.7 0.7 1.7
The enthalpy of states 1 and 3 can be found using the NIST website. For states 2 and 4, use the following expressions to find the enthalpies = (1 x)h l + xh v h 2 2 2 =h +v (P P ) h 4 3 l (P4 P3 ) = h3 + v 3 4 3 To find x, use the fact that the turbine is isentropic.
1 = s 2 s
l v 1 = (1 x) s 2 2 + xs s
85
x = 0.938
Also, from the NIST website: J h1 = 36046 mol J l = 18416 h2 mol J v = 35353 h2 mol J h3 = 18416 mol 3 5 m v3 = 6.954 10 mol (sat. vapor at 1.7 MPa)
Substituting these values into the expression for h4 and h2 yields J h2 = 34302.9 mol J h4 = 18485.5 mol Equation 3.82 states
rankine =
h2 h1 (h4 h3 ) h1 h4
J J J J 36046 18416 34302.9 18485.5 mol mol mol mol rankine = J J 18485.5 36046 mol mol rankine = 0.095 This efficiency is significantly lower than a conventional power plant.
86
3.40 (a) Using the information in the problem statement and our knowledge of ideal vapor compression cycles, the following table can be created
Thermodynamic P (MPa) State 1 Sat. Mixture 0.12 2 Sat. Vapor 0.12 3 Superheated Vapor 0.7 4 Sat. Liquid 0.7 Note: Refer to Figure 3.9 to review labeling convention. Equation 3.85 states
State
87
From the NIST website: J s3 = s2 (sat. vapor at 0.12 MPa ) = 177.89 mol K Now, state 3 is constrained. kJ h3 = 43.031 mol Therefore, mol kJ kJ & = W C 0.5 s 43.031 mol 39.295 mol = 1.87 [kW ]
(c) Equation 3.90 states:
kJ kJ 24 . 181 39.295 h h h h mol mol = 4.05 COP = 2 1 = 2 4 = h3 h2 h3 h2 kJ kJ 39.295 43.031 mol mol
88
3.41 Using the information in the problem statement and our knowledge of ideal vapor compression cycles, the following table can be created
Thermodynamic P (MPa) State 1 Sat. Mixture 0.12 2 Sat. Vapor 0.12 3 Superheated Vapor 0.7 4 Sat. Liquid 0.7 Note: Refer to Figure 3.9 to review labeling convention. From Equation 3.90 COP =
State
& Q h h C = 2 1 & WC h3 h2
The enthalpy of state 2 can be found directly from the NIST website, but the enthalpies of states 1 and 3 require the use of additional information. kJ h2 = 39.295 mol (sat. vapor at 0.12 MPa)
For the process between state 2 and state 3, s 2 = s3 From the NIST website: J s3 = s 2 = 177.89 mol K Now, state 3 is constrained. kJ h3 = 43.031 mol J 0.7 MPa, s3 = 177.89 mol K (sat. vapor at 0.12 MPa)
The process between state 4 and state 1 is also isentropic. J s1 = s 4 = 115.09 mol K (sat. liquid at 0.7 MPa)
89
l v s1 = (1 x )s1 + xs1
where J l = 90.649 s1 mol K J v s1 = 177.89 mol K Therefore, J J J = (1 x ) 177.89 90.649 + x 115.09 mol K mol K mol K x = 0.280 Using the quality of R134a, the enthalpy of state 1 can be calculated as follows
l v h1 = (1 x )h1 + xh1
From the NIST website: kJ l = 17.412 h1 mol kJ v h1 = 39.295 mol Therefore, kJ kJ h1 = (1 0.28) 17.412 mol + 0.28 39.295 mol kJ h1 = 20.74 mol Now, everything needed to calculate COP is available. Using Equation 3.90,
kJ kJ 39.295 20.74 h h mol mol = 4.97 COP = 2 1 = h3 h2 kJ kJ 43.031 39.295 mol mol
90
Is this modification practical? No. An isentropic turbine adds significant level of complexity to the cycle. Turbines are expensive and wear over time. Furthermore, the real turbine added to the cycle will not be 100% efficient, so the COP will not increase as much. The cost of the turbine is not justified by the increase in COP.
91
3.42 The subscript h refers to the hotter cycle, while c refers to the cooler cycle. The (a) The flow rate of the cooler cycle can be found by performing an energy balance on the condenser/evaporator shared between the two cycles. An energy balance shows:
& & & Q H , c = QC , h = Q
&c n
&c n
92
where
& &c (h7 h6 ) W C,c = n & & h (h3 h2 ) W C,h = n
We have all of the required enthalpies except h3. State 3 is constrained because J s3 = s 2 = 175.95 mol K P3 = 0.7 MPa From the NIST website: J h3 = 42428 mol J ) (R134a vapor at 0.7 MPa with s = 175.95 mol K (sat. R134a vapor at 0.35 MPa)
93
J J J J & W C , total = 0.411 [mol/s] 41510 mol 39295 mol + 0.5 [mol/s] 42428 mol 40967 mol
& W C , total = 1.64 [kW ]
& W C , total
& Q C
(e) The COP for the cascade is 4.56, while the COP is 4.05 in Problem 3.40. The cascade systems COP is 12.6% greater.
94
In order to cool a system to -5 C, the temperature of the fluid must be colder than -5 C so that heat transfer will occur. We arbitrarily specify that the working fluid evaporates at -10 C. Similarly, in order to eject heat to the 20 C reservoir, the fluid must condense at a temperature greater than 20 C. Arbitrarily, we choose 25 C. One possible refrigeration cycle is presented below.
valve T 1 evaporator refrigerated unit at -5 C 4 QC QH 2 3 W c compressor condenser 20 C reservoir 1 QC 2 4 QH 3
A number of fluids will work sufficiently for this system, but the design process will be illustrated using R134a. For states 3 and 4, the pressure is constant, and for states 1 and 2, the pressure is constant at a different value. From the NIST website, we find
P (Tsat = -10 C) 1 = P2 = 0.201 MPa P3 = P4 = 0.665 MPa (Tsat = 25 C) (Note: The temperatures of each state are not constant. The listed saturation temperatures are the temperatures at which the fluid evaporates and condenses.)
Now that the pressures are known, we can compute the required flow rate required in order to provide 20 kW of cooling.
From the NIST website: J h2 = 40064 mol (sat. R134 vapor at 0.201 MPa)
95
J h4 = 23931 mol
&= n
& Q 20,000 [J/s] C = (h2 h1 ) J J 40064 mol 23931 mol mol & = 1.24 n s
96
3.44 The schematic of the process and the corresponding Ts is presented below
T = 5 oC Fridge 2 valve 3 T = -15 oC Freezer evaporator QC,F 4 5 Wc compressor QC,R evaporator 6 5 oC QH condenser s high T reservoir -15 oC 2 1 1 QH Wc QC,R 3 QC,F 4 5 valve T 6
A number of refrigerants will work for this system, but the design process will be illustrated for R134a only. To define each state, we need to thermodynamically constrain each state. You should note that the problem doesnt state what temperature the fluid condenses at. Therefore, we can assume the temperature is 25 C. By using information in the Ts diagram and from the NIST website, we find
P 1 = P2 = 0.34966 MPa P3 = P4 = 0.16394 MPa
P5 = P6 = 0.66538 MPa
Before solving for additional pressures and temperatures, we will list the known temperatures and pressures.
State 1 2 3 4 5 6 Temperature (C) 5 5 -15 -15 25 25 Pressure (MPa) 0.24334 0.24334 0.16394 0.16394 0.66538 0.66538
States 4, 5, and 6 are completely constrained as confirmed by Gibbs phase rule. Now, we need to find the liquid and vapor compositions of states 1, 2, and 3 to completely constrain the states. Since the heat duties are equal for the refrigerator and the freezer, we have the following relationship:
& & Q C , F = QC , R
97
which upon performing an energy balance becomes h4 h3 = h2 h1 Energy balances around the valves provide: h1 = h6 h2 = h3 Substituting these relationships into the expression that equates the heat loads results in
h + h6 h2 = h3 = 4 2
From the NIST website: J h4 = 39755 mol J h6 = 23931 mol Now constrain states 1, 2, and 3 by determining the enthalpies: J h1 = h6 = 23931 mol J J + 23931 39755 mol mol = 31843 J h2 = h3 = 2 mol Technically, the states are now all constrained, but we would like also like to know the vapor and liquid compositions of each state. The compositions of states 4, 5, and 6 are already known; we can calculate the compositions of states 1, 2, and 3 as follows:
sat sat h1 = (1 x1 )h1 , l + x1h1, v sat sat h2 = (1 x2 )h2 , l + x2 h2, v sat sat h3 = (1 x3 )h3 , l + x3 h3, v
98
x3 = 0.630
1 2 3 4 5 6
5 5 -15 -15 25 25
Saturated Liquid and Vapor Saturated Liquid and Vapor Saturated Liquid and Vapor Saturated Vapor Superheated Vapor Saturated Liquid
99
3.45 In this case, the working material is a solid. The four states of the magnetic material are shown of the sT diagram below. Note the axis are shifted from the usual manner.
3 2 QC 1 4 QH
(a) The heat expelled by the cold reservoir can be approximated by:
qC TC (s 2 s1 ) where T is the average temperature between states 1 and 2, which is approximately 1 K. Taking values of S/R from the sT diagram, we get: J qC R(1.9 1.3) = 5.0 mol K
(b) Similarly, the heat absorbed by the hot reservoir can be approximated by:
COP =
qC wC ,total
qC = 0.11 q H qC
(d) The value of COP is much lower than a typical refrigeration process (COP= 4-6); in general, refrigeration processes at these low temperatures are much less efficient.
F. Work is supplied to magnetize the material and to spin the wheel. 100
3.46 When the polymer is unstretched it is in a more entangled state. When stretched the polymer chains tend to align. The alignment decreases the spatial configurations the polymer can have, and therefore, reduces that component of entropy. If the process is adiabatic, the entropy of the system cannot decrease. Consequently, its thermal entropy must increase. The only way this can be accomplished is by increased temperature.
101
3.47 Assume the temperature is 298 K. The following data was taken from Table A.3.2:
The data listed above were used to create the next table using s f = h f g f T Species Cu2O (s) O2 (g) CuO (s) s f (kJ/mol K) -0.0766 0 -0.0932
Now the change in entropy of the reaction can be calculated in a method analogous to Equation 2.72 kJ kJ s rxn = vi s f = 2 + 4 - 0.0766 - 0.0932 i mol K mol K kJ s rxn = 0.22 mol Does this violate the second law of thermodynamics? This problem shows that the entropy change of the system is negative, but nothing has been said about the entropy change of the universe. We must look at the change in entropy of the surroundings to determine if the second law is violated. By looking at the enthalpies, we see that the reaction is exothermic, which means that heat is transferred from the system to the surroundings. Therefore, the entropy of the surroundings will increase during this reaction.
( )
102
3.48 The temperature and pressure terms in the equation for entropy do not contribute anything to the entropy change because they are constant. Therefore, the only remaining entropy contribution, the randomness of the atomic arrangements, must be considered. The randomness does not increase when CdTe forms. In pure crystals of Cd and Te, the location of each atom is known because the crystal lattice constrains the atomic locations. In CdTe, the crystal lattice still defines the location of each atom, so the randomness has not increased. Therefore, the change in entropy is zero. 3.49 This argument is not scientifically sound. Morris is arguing that since evolution results in more order, the second law of thermodynamics is violated, so evolution must be impossible. However, the flaw in this argument is caused by ignoring the entropy change of the entire universe. The second law states that the entropy of the universe will remain constant or increase for any process. Morris argument was based on the entropy of the system undergoing evolution not the entropy of the entire universe. A system can decrease in entropy if the entropy of the surroundings increases by at least that much.
103
3.50 Entropy is related to the number of configurations that a state can have. The greater the number of configurations, the more probable the state is and the greater the entropy. We can qualitatively relate this concept to the possible hands in a game of poker, but it is more interesting to quantify the results using some basic concepts of probability.
We consider a hand of poker containing 5 cards randomly draw from a deck of 52 cards.. There are a finite number of permutations in which we can arrange a 52 card deck in 5 cards. For the first card in the hand, we select from 52 cards, the second card can be any other card so we select from 51 cards, the third card has 50 cards, and so on. Thus the number of permutations of 5 cards is:
P = 52 51 50 49 48 = 311,875,200
However, we do not care the order in which the cards are dealt, so we must divide this number by the number of ways we can come up with the same hand. We do this math in a similar way. For a given hand there are five cards we can pick first, four we can pick second, . So the number of ways we can make the same hand is:
N = 5 4 3 2 1 = 120
The number of unique configurations can be found by dividing P by N . Thus, the cards can display
C= P = 2,598,960 N
or 2,598,960 unique configurations. To find the entropy of a given hand, we need to find out how many of these unique configurations belong to the hand Consider a four of a kind. There are 13 different possible ranks of four of a kind, one for each number A, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7,8, 9, 10, J, Q, K. The fifth card in the hand could be any of the other 48 cards. Therefore, the number of combinations of four of a kind is: 13 x 48 = 624 The probability of a four of a kind is: 624 / 2598960 = 1 / 4165 which is very unlikely. Thus the entropy of this hand is low. In contrast, there are 1,098,240 to have a hand that has one pair; therefore the probability of getting this hand is much greater, 1/2.4, and its entropy is high. The probability of having nothing is 1/2 which represents the most likely hand in poker, or the hand with the highest entropy. In fact, the rules of poker are defined so the hand of lower entropy always beats the hand of higher entropy.
104