Headphone Buying Guide

SPECI AL FEATURES
SUMMIT-FI THE PINNACLE OF AUDIOPHILE PERFORMANCE

HEADPHONE AMPS GETTING THE FULL EXPERIENCE
new for summer
GAMING HEADPHONES GET IN THE GAME
V
I
S
I
T

O
U
R

P
R
E
M
I
E
R

S
P
O
N
S
O
R
Head-Fi would like to extend
special thanks to our sponsors:
NU FORCE
ALO AUDIO
V-MODA
JH AUDIO
HEAD-DIRECT
MOON AUDIO
FIIO
AUDIOFLY
LAB KABLE
ASUS
AUDEZE
Founder & Editor
Head-Fi.org
JUDE MANSILLA
Creative Director
Huddler, Inc.
TONY GLORIOSO
Sales & Marketing
Huddler, Inc.
CONNER CALLAHAN
Editorial Assistant
Head-Fi.org
JOE CWIK
Editorial & Partner Support
Huddler, Inc.
NICK VALLURI
Head-Fi is the online HQ for headphone &
personal audio enthusiasts.
2012, Huddler.com.
Head-Fi.org is a Huddler
community.
After we first published the Head-Fi Holiday Gift Guide, some
people asked me if I could make it more accessible, particularly
for non-Head-Fiers who might happen upon it. And while I may
think of ways to do that in future updates, the Head-Fi Gift Guide
is mostly for the more diehard Head-Fiersthe ones who probably
wont need to look up the definition of IEM, 24/192, DAC,
FLAC, XLR, or opamp. Of course, Id be thrilled if non-Head-
Fiers also nd the guide interesting, but at its core, this gift guide
is for us, the denizens of the Head-Fi communitythe hardcore
headphone audio enthusiasts.
With each update (and were planning on doing at least two
updates per year), new products will be added to the guide; and
some may also be removed, as theyre value-bumped by the
introduction of better such products, or discontinued.
And, again, the Head-Fi Gift Guide is in no way intended to be
an encyclopedia of all the worlds headphone hi-fi products; but,
rather, a look at some of this communitys favorite products as
gift ideas. And, in most cases (unless otherwise indicated), the
products in the guide will be products I have direct experience
using and listening to.
I hope you find the Head-Fi Gift Guide helpful and fun!
Best Regards,
Jude Mansilla
FOUNDER, HEAD-FI.ORG
Founders Letter
JUDE MANSILLA
2
OVER-EARHEADPHONES
IN-EARHEADPHONES
WIRELESSHEADPHONES
HEADPHONEAMPS
(& OTHER GEAR)
SUMMITFI
4
5
20
36
40
62
featurettes
GAMINGHEADSETS
POWERCORNER
HEADPHONECABLES
DESKTOPAUDIO
PORTABLEDEVICES
18
46
44
51
59
PAGE74
BE HEARD.
From new breeds teeming with
audiophile potential, to old classics
we know and love, this selection of
over-the-ear headphones will keep
your favorite tracks playing loud
and clear.
05
6
SONY MDR-V6
Closed, full-size, on-the-ear headphone (around $65)
www.sony.com
If youre wondering why this headphone is included in the guide, call it a bit of sentimentality from methe Sony
MDR-V6 was the headphone that got me started on this long, winding headphone hi- journey back in the 1980s.
Is it the best at the price? No, and hasnt been in a long time. You can nd headphones that isolate more, sound more
rened, have better detail retrieval, etc.
Yeah, its old, but its still a rugged, well-isolating, fun, bright, lively sounding headphone with good bass extension
and impact. The MDR-V6 (and its pro-audio twin, the Sony MDR-7506) is still widely used in studios and on-location
as a pro monitoring piece.
This many years later, I still like the classic ol V6, and still feel comfortable recommending it from time to time.
...the V6 has aged very well... It is well-built, comfortable, and isolating enough to compete with the best modern
studio and DJ headphones.
Head-Fi member/reviewer ljokerl
GRADO SR-60i AND GRADO SR-80i
Open, full-size, on-the-ear headphones (around $60 and $80, respectively)
www.gradolabs.com
Why have I listed both the Grado SR-60i and the SR-80i? Because, so often, SR-60i owners end up quickly upgrading
to the SR-80i.
After many years being happy with the Sony MDR-V6, the Grado SR-60 and SR-80 represented the next steps in my
Head-Fi journey. These entry-level Grado headphones have probably created more headphone audiophiles than any
other headphone models, for their affordability, for their accessibility at many audio retail locations, and for their lively
presentations.
The Grado SR-60i and Grado SR-80i sound immediately impressive, addictive, especially to those who arent already
grizzled Head-Fi veterans.
Ive gifted several sets of Grado SR-60i and SR-80i headphones, and theyve been met with great smiles and
enthusiasm every single time.
The best thing about the Grados is that they dont try to be a jack of all trades. They are absolutely stunning for what
they are; clear, detailed, bright, and aggressive Rock cans. As far as I am concerned the SR60i really is one of the
best all-around values in personal audio.
The Grado SR80 is a classic headphone. It has a classic style... It has been around virtually unchanged for years. It
is a superb entry to audiophile headphone listening.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Prog Rock Man
7
SONY MDR-ZX700
Closed, full-size, on-the-ear headphone (around $120)
www.sony.com
The MDR-ZX700s bass is energetic, yet controlled, which is a trait I dont think is common enough in affordable closed
headphones. The MDR-ZX700s mids and highs are resolving without being edgy.
If youve heard the Shure SRH440, but felt it on the colder side of your tonal preferences, then the Sonys more authoritative
bass (and a slightly warmer tilt than the Shure) might be more your speed.
I consider the MDR-ZX700 a sort of modern spin by Sony on its classic Sony MDR-V6a more current, affordable closed
headphone, and another classic in the making.
The bass-midrange balance of the ZX700 is a bit better than that of the V6, making the transition appear smoother and
the general signature more balanced. Indeed, I couldnt think of a better term for the overall sound of the ZX700 than
well-blended as the sound signature really does sit better with me than the sum of its parts.... Punchy and warm but
with excellent resolution and a strong midrange presence, the Sonys make for good all-rounders... the sound signature
simply works when taken as a whole.
AUDIO-TECHNICA ATH-M50
Closed, full-size, around-the-ear headphone (around $160)
www.audio-technica.com
Im including the closed-back ATH-M50 in this guide because it is a very strong
favorite in this price range with Head-Fiers, known for solid overall performance
at the price, with a tendency toward bass emphasis and sparkly treble. I see few
headphones recommended as often by our community, both for starters looking for a
good entry into Head-Fidom, as well as for seasoned Head-Fiers looking for a good
closed around-the-ear headphone.
The ATH-M50 is one of those rare products where the quality/price ratio really hits
the sweet spot, and in fact is like a small miracle in the world of pro audio. When you
get Grammy Award-winning audio engineers and producers like George Massenburg,
Frank Filipetti, Al Schmitt, etc., singing its praises publicly, you know its got to be
something special.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Rob Chang (Lunatique)
8
SENNHEISER HD 558 AND SENNHEISER HD 598
Open, full-size, around-the-ear headphone (around $190 and $250, respectively)
www.sennheiser.com
For a nice open-backed full size headphone in this price range, Sennheisers HD 558 is one of the best choices Ive come
across. Lightweight, and well padded, the HD 558 is among the most comfortable headphones Ive owned (at any price),
and Ive owned a lot of headphones.
And, thankfully, the HD 558 sounds as good as it is comfortable, projecting a wide, open sonic image. Though its bass
presentation is more on the neutral side, theres still a sense of fullness down low. Smooth, yet with outstanding detail
overall, is how Id characterize this headphone.
The HD 598 is like an HD 558 that went to sonic nishing schoolsimply put, its more rened. Most noticeable is that
the HD 598s presentation is slightly more treble-tilted, and its bass more controlled. The HD 598s more polished sound
signature is, to my ears, higher-end, and earns the difference in price between it and its mid-line sibling.
I also love the HD 598s entirely unique color schemeno other headphone Im aware of looks like it, with its cream-
colored leather-like chassis, and dark brown faux burl wood trim and velour ear cushions.
There is just too much to like about the HD598. I classify it as the best all-rounder, multi-purpose headphone that I
have ever had the privilege to listen to. Its just one of those headphones that are a joy to own, because there is always
something that it can be great at. And its exible enough that it can *always* be used for something, if not everything.
Whether using it for its superb long term comfort, utilizing its expansive soundstage to gain an edge in gaming, or just
simply to enjoy tunes with its very special sound signature; the HD598 is sure to impress just about anyone in some
aspect or another. Quite the achievement by Sennheiser if you ask me.
Head-Fi member Katun
PSB M4U 2
Closed, full-size, active-noise-canceling, around-the-ear headphone ($399)
www.psbspeakers.com
Paul Bartons company (PSB) is well known with audio enthusiasts as a loudspeaker company whose products typically
perform well above their price points. When I found out Barton wanted to turn his attention to headphones (as an
increasing number of loudspeaker manufacturers are doing), he had my attention.
The M4U 2 is an impressive rst go at headphones for Barton. First of all, it also operates passively, and in this mode the
M4U 2 sounds very good, with some well-executed low bass emphasis, and good clarity throughout. The M4U 2 also has
an amplied mode without active noise canceling, which could come in handy if all youve got on hand is a particularly
anemic headphone output. This amplied mode has a lively sound, but at the expense of a little self-noise from the
amp circuit, and some loss of clarity (compared to its passive mode). The M4U 2s active noise canceling circuit is good
(though denitely not as effective as the Bose QC15s). And, again, like Sennheisers active noise-cancelers (and unlike
Boses), the M4U 2 also operates passively, so that when your batteries die, youre music need not be cast aside.
The biggest downsides for me are the M4U 2s size (its large) and the fact that it doesnt fold at (so the carrying case
is bulky). And, though the M4U 2 is rather comfortable on my huge head, it doesnt feel as light and gentle on the head
(in terms of both weight and clamping force) as the QC15. It also has an imposing look on the head--rather heavy and
severe looking.
Simply put, with its active modes turned off, the PSB M4U 2 is a good 32-ohm closed headphone that responds well
to good portable and desktop amps, and yet can still be driven well directly from my iPhone 4S. Its self-amplied and
active noise canceling modes are nice bonuses. If youre in the market for a good over-ear travel headphoneand sound
quality is your primary concernthe PSB M4U 2 should denitely be placed on your list of candidates.
BOSE QUIETCOMFORT 15
Closed, full-size, active-noise-canceling, around-the-ear headphone ($299)
www.bose.com
The Bose QuietComfort 15 has the most effective active noise cancellation circuit Ive yet used; and, for an active noise
canceler, this headphone sounds pretty good, too. If the amount of active noise attenuation is your primary consideration, the
QC15 would be my top recommendationits uncannily good in this regard.
Musically, the QC15 sounds good, too; but, if youre used to ultra-high-end headphones (like ones we more typically discuss at
Head-Fi in this price range), the QC15 is not likely to wow you with its musical output while sitting in a quiet room at your desk
or in your easy chair. Use it in its element (plane, train, data center, any place with loud droning background noise), and its a
very hard over-ear headphone to top.
Additionally, the Bose QC15 is exceptionally comfortable, even on my huge head, with its very moderate clamping force, very
soft cushy earpads, and light weight. The QC15 also folds very at into its compact semi-hardside case, so its easy to pack.
If youre type of person who travels a bunch, but cant get comfortable with in-ear headphones, then the QC15 has to be added
to your must-try list. As far as over-ear headphones go, the Bose QC15 is my current rst choice for international travel.
SKULLCANDY ROC NATION AVIATOR
Closed, full-size, around-the-ear headphones (around $150)
www.skullcandy.com
The Skullcandy Aviator, in my opinion, is one of the coolest looking headphones on the head, though it takes some youthful
spirit to pull it off.
Sonically, I think the Aviator holds its own as a portable headphone, even at $150, with its surprisingly even-handed
presentation (surprising considering rapper Jay Z had something to do with it), and a nice open sound. That openness comes
at the expense of isolation, which the Aviator is devoid of (despite technically being a closed headphone)so, in terms of
isolation, assume it similar to an open headphone.
I prefer the Aviators better when it comes to overall sound quality/clarity. Especially if youre listening to rock/acoustic/
alternative... They also scale up with a better source and are light and comfortable...
Head-Fi member Roma (Roma101)
SKULLCANDY MIX MASTER MIKE
Closed, full-size, around-the-ear headphones (around $250)
www.skullcandy.com
The Mix Master Mike is a DJ-type headphone (designed in conjunction with its legendary DJ namesake), with a couple of unique
features. DJs often do one-ear listening, so the Mix Master Mike sums both channels to mono when either earpiece is rotated
for one-ear listening. The single-side headphone cable can be plugged into either the left or right earpiece. And theres a mute button.
The Mix Master Mikes prominent (but not overwhelming) bass, good mids, and softer treble, all combine nicely for an
easy-to-listen to sound signature that is modestly detailed. Overall, I think the Mix Master Mike is the most rened sounding
Skullcandy headphone so far. Build quality seems good, but rather plasticky in the hand. The Mix Master Mike might be a tough
sell, though, to Head-Fiers at $250, a price point at which many outstanding headphones reside. But I think its a worthy full-
size closed headphone consideration, even at the price.
9
V-MODA CROSSFADE M-80 AND CROSSFADE LP2
Closed, portable...M-80 is on-the ear, and the LP2 is around-the-ear
(both around $200)
www.v-moda.com
In the past year, V-MODAs M-80 has earned a place as one of the top choices
for a closed, portable, around-the-ear headphone (alongside the likes of the
Sennheiser HD 25-1 II and the beyerdynamic DT 1350).
The M-80s sound signature includes rich, detailed mids, accompanied by
smooth treble response, and full bass (with emphasis placed where I think any
bass emphasis should be, which is down in the deep-bass region). Its a sound
signature that many audiophiles have found very easy to love, and with enough
of a down-low kick to also satisfy the more typical non-Head-Fier consumer
tastes. (I nd most non-audiophile consumers tend to prefer bass emphasis to
neutrality.)
On sonics alone, I think the M-80 is entirely in HD 25-1 II and DT 1350 territory.
That the M-80 sounds so good and looks so stylish is a huge win. I think its one of
the headphones that will force the makers of its more conservatively styled (read:
staidly styled) competitors to take notice.
The full-size Crossfade LP2 is a renement of V-MODAs Crossfade (which, by
the way, is still available), taming the original Crossfades very heavy bass, and
adding in more present, more detailed treble. Despite the renements (relative
to the original Crossfade), the LP2 is still a bass-heavy headphone, and a ne
choice for a travel headphone for those who dont like in-ears or active noise-
cancelers. (In noisy environments, I like some bass emphasis, to help strengthen
the sense of rhythm through the din.)
Like the original Crossfade, the Crossfade LP2 is a full-size around-the-ear
headphone, and is very comfortable to wear, even for extended periods of time. In
addition to their stunning looks, both the M-80 and LP2 are built very tough, and
should withstand much abuse. And, recently, V-MODA has improved its three-
button remote/mic cable signicantly, separating the mic unit from the remote
(for ergonomic improvement) and improving sound quality on both the send and
receive sides. (This new cable is called the SpeakEasy cable.)
SHURE SRH440
Closed, around-the-ear headphone (around $100)
www.shure.com
A closed-back, pro-audio-oriented headphone, the SRH440 has found popularity for studio use. However, many
audiophiles also appreciate its more neutral tonal balance, the SRH440 having none of the bass bloat that many of its
closed competitors have. Though a full-size headphone, it folds into a pretty compact, portable bundle.
At its street price of around $100, I think the Shure SRH440 is one of the better bargains in Head-Fidom, particularly
because it can be challenging to nd a good, affordable, neutral-ish closed headphone.
If you are looking for great closed headphones and are on a budget, my vote is for the Shure SRH-440 and no other.
Head-Fi member/reviewer gelocks
BEYERDYNAMIC DT 1350
Closed, portable, on-the-ear headphone (around $300)
north-america.beyerdynamic.com
On sound alone, the beyerdynamic DT 1350 is my current favorite closed, portable around-the-ear headphone. Sonically, I
simply couldnt expect much more from something this compact, as the DT 1350 sounds to me like a very good full-sized,
closed around-the-ear headphone.
This little beyerdynamic also seems durable enough to easily withstand the physical abuse of being crammed into my
backpacks and messenger bags. The DT 1350 is part of beyerdynamics agship Tesla line. Though it was designed as a
pro audio headphone, it still may be the most audiophile-friendly closed, portable around-the-ear Ive heard.
For portable use, its important to note that the DT 1350s plug housing is rather large (more like a full-size headphones
plug); and that it does not come with portable-use accoutrements like inline remote or a headset mic. Yes, Id love to
have those features, but, still, its sound quality currently puts the DT 1350 in my on-the-go bag very frequently.
Superb build quality and unprecedented isolation meet sound quality that can rival the best portable headphones
Ive heard and many full-size sets. The construction is nothing short of bulletproof and - soundstage size aside - the
DT1350 is technically the best truly portable headphone Ive come across, boasting superb detail and clarity, excellent
bass control, and a level signature.
FISCHER AUDIO FA-003
www.scheraudio.com
A very well-regarded, affordable closed headphone on Head-Fi.org, Ive only heard the FA-003 briey (and it made a great
rst impression). While I await more personal experience with this headphone, heres what veteran Head-Fi member,
reviewer, re-masterer LFF had to say about it:
They are light, comfy and sound fantastic. These are mastering grade headphones and I wouldnt hesitate for one
second to recommend them for such critical sound applications. The sonic picture the FA-003s painted time after time
never failed to impress me.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Luis Flores (LFF)
Packaging and accessories are brilliant. Build
quality is top notch and very tting for a portable
model. Comfort, a subjective thing to be sure, is
better (for me) than any similar type of headphone
Ive ever tried. These things alone add up to a
great user experience, even if that was all the
M-80s had going for them... And then theres the
sound. Large, solid, impactful bass that mostly
stays well controlled. Warm, full mids that make
any genre seem engaging. And a smooth balanced
top end that is reasonably detailed but extremely
forgiving of poor material or equipment. I enjoy
these. A lot. Even at home when I have plenty of
better options, these are still fun to listen to. That
seems like a successful product to me.
Head-Fi member/reviewer John Grandberg (project86)
10 11
SENNHEISER HD 25-1 II AND HD 25-1 II ORIGINALS
Closed, portable, on-the-ear headphone (around $180 to $250)
www.sennheiser.com
One of the all-time headphone hi- classics, the Sennheiser HD 25-1 II is still the top choice for a closed,
portable on-the-ear headphone for many Head-Fiers. Its one of my all-time favorites in that category.
With robust bass, relatively neutral mids, and a lively treble, the HD 25-1 II is denitely on the fun side of the
audiophile-type sound signatures.
With an extremely tough build (yet still lightweight), the Sennheiser HD 25-1 II remains a popular DJ headphone
for its bombproof durability, outstanding isolation, and retro-hip utilitarian looks. And if you want one of the
grooviest looking portable headphone choices around, pick up the Originals version, which is a special adidas
co-branded edition--same headphone, but with very cool, sporty adidas blue stripes, cable, and pads.
These cans are tried and true, with a great all-rounder sound. Good energy throughout, the bottom end
provides a nice driving rhythm and the top end is tuned for just the right amount of shimmer with hi hats.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Armaegis
SENNHEISER AMPERIOR
Closed, portable, on-the-ear headphone (around $350)
www.sennheiser.com
Despite the new name, theres no denying that the new Amperior by Sennheiser was born of the Sennheiser HD
25 line of headphones--I mean, just look at it. And if you consider the Amperior a new addition to the HD 25
family, then its the best sounding HD 25 Ive yet heard. The occasional tendency of the HD 25-1 II to be treble-
peaky has been done away with in the Amperior. The Amperior also renes the HD 25s bass, exhibiting greater
control and denition. That the Amperior has a nominal impedance of only 18 ohms, and is quite sensitive,
makes it easy to drive straight from your phone or media player. No amp? No problem. Not surprisingly, the
Amperior has become one of my favorite grab-and-go over-ear headphones.
Construction quality feels every bit as solid as the HD 25s before it. Actually, its substantial use of metal makes
it feel even more unyielding than the HD 25s before it. Its machined solid aluminum earcups feel bulletproof,
and look very cool, in either blue or silver.
My only real quibble with the Amperior is that it comes with a 3-button remote/mic accessory dongle--Id
have preferred that its cable instead had an in-line, built-in version. Also, like beyerdynamics DT 1350, the
Amperiors plug housing is quite large. But these are just minor quibbles with a headphone that sounds and
looks so darn good.
A worthy addition to the legacy of the HD 25 family, I think the Sennheiser Amperior is going to be a blockbuster
headphone with high-end headphone enthusiasts.

12 13
SENNHEISER PX 90 AND PX 200-II
Portable, on-the-ear headphones
(PX 90 is open, PX 200 is closed. Priced around $30 and $90, respectively)
www.sennheiser.com
The Sennheiser PX 90 has a charming, no-frills design. With the simplest of headbands, afxed to which are equally unadorned open
earpieces, the PX 90 reminds me of the legendary (and equally stark) HD 414.
What you get for around $30 with the PX 90 is an elegant, well-balanced sounding headphone thats great for on-the-go use. If youre a
Head-Fier with several people on your gift list youd like to introduce to Head-Fidom, the PX 90 is an excellent, affordable choice.
The PX 200-II is an easy go-to for a portable around-the-ear headphone under $100 with a more neutral sound signature. If youve found
most portable around-the-ears too bass-heavy for you, put the PX 200-II at the top of your list, especially if you want something ultra-
portable. A closed, on-the-ear design, the PX 200-II provides good passive noise isolation, too.
(The PX 200-II is now also available with a three-button remote/mic cable, and that model is the PX 200-IIi, and is priced around $110.)
The PX200-II therefore has all the hallmarks of a critical and commercial success usability, excellent sonic characteristics, and a
respected name to back it all up - and will likely become more popular than the famed PX100 in the near future...
HIFIMAN HE-400
Open, full-size, around-the-ear headphone ($399)
www.himan.us
I wondered when something would come round to challenge the Sennheiser HD 600 and HD 650 for my top pick in the sub-$500 sit-down,
high-end headphone category, and that something is the HE-400 planar magnetic headphone by HiFiMAN. Listen to this headphone,
and its $399 price tag will have you wondering if its price was mismarkedlike you found something in the clearance bin that wasnt
supposed to be there.
If the HD 600 and HD 650 arent pressing your sparkly-treble hot-button, the HE-400 probably will. Bringing to bear a lot of what makes
the higher-end planar magnetic headphones by HiFiMAN and Audeze so specialbut with a bargain price, and enough sensitivity to be
driven by an iPhone 4S in a pinchthe HE-400 is one of the easiest sub-$500 recommendations to make right now.
Soaring, shimmering treble, and a greater sense of overall speedcertainly more so than any over-ear in this price range that Ive
heardare the HE-400s hallmarks.
CREATIVE LABS AURVANA LIVE!
www.creative.com
Creative Labs has been discussed a lot on Head-Fis forums, particularly their audio/MIDI interface products. Of their slew of headphone
products, though, one routinely shines through with frequent member recommendations, and thats the Creative Aurvana Live.
...the CAL!s are bass-heavy headphones with a very rich-sounding midrange and a warm tonality. However, the Creatives boast better
clarity in the (far less forward) midrange and a more dimensional sound - the soundstage has some depth in addition to the width. They
are more laid back and balanced and at the same time a little faster when the music calls for it. The bass is textured, fairly well-controlled,
and surprisingly deep (capable of dropping below 30Hz).
BOWERS & WILKINS P5 MOBILE
AND BLUEANT EMBRACE
Closed, portable, on-the-ear headphones ($299 and $199)
www.bowers-wilkins.com
www.myblueant.com
Another good around-the-ear passive isolator is the ber-stylish Bowers & Wilkins P5 Mobile.
The P5 looks like something crafted by Swiss watchmakers. The P5 is so luxurious that your
ngers never come in contact with anything but metal or soft leather.
And the P5s style continues with its appearance when worn, its lines elegant and graceful,
but bold enough to be tastefully noticeable.
How does the P5 sound? It doesnt quite have the sound quality and detail of the top
audiophile portables, but it still sounds very good, with a sonic signature best described as
smooth. The Bowers & Wilkins P5 does provide extremely effective noise isolation (passively),
inline controls and headset microphone, and so is a fantastic, voguish travel headphone.
Following is a quote from my review of the Bowers & Wilkins P5:

That the stunning looking P5 is such a huge hit isnt the least bit surprising to me. I
absolutely love this headphone, for what it is.
If $299 is just too much a stretch for you--but the allure of the P5 is too strong to resist--
consider the BlueAnt Embrace, which I suspect may have been inspired by the P5.
From the standpoint of design, the Embrace looks like the P5s more conservative, less
extravagant sibling. The leather used on the Embrace isnt as fancy or supple as the P5s, but
the Embraces padding in the headband and earpads is more abundant, and super cushiony
its earpads are like uffy pillows. I have to give the Embrace the edge in comfort.
In terms of sound, I prefer the P5s brand of smoothness to the Embraces, although the
Embraces warm signature (with mid-bass emphasis) and reasonable level of detail is both
pleasant and fun. For its rst foray into premium wired headphones, the Embrace is an
impressive effort by BlueAnt (a company known for its Bluetooth headsets).
The P5s artisanal materials, t, nish and style make
for a headphone that many of its owners will be proud
to own. Its delicate lines and light weight belie its
vault-strong construction. Almost a year later, and I
still love handling and wearing the P5. Something this
gorgeous, this well crafted, does instill that sense of
pride of ownership that one might feel owning, say, a
beautiful wristwatch.
KOSS PORTAPRO
Open, portable, on-the-ear headphones (around $40 for standard version, and around $80 for the KTC version)
www.koss.com
Theres something--a certain je ne sais quoithat makes Koss PortaPro timeless. Its not just its looks, as looks alone
might render the mighty PortaPro dated (though theres no denying its vintage aesthetic is part of its charm).
This is a bassy headphone, and its bass denes it--heavy, just shy of sloppy by audiophile standards, but always fun.
Despite its bassiness, the PortaPro still manages to sound coherent. Its mids and highs are good, but if youre looking for
a mid-centric and/or bright headphone, youre going to have to look elsewhere. Also, if youre a detail freak, walk past the
PortaPro.
This year, Koss also released a version of the PortaPro called the PortaPro KTC (Koss Touch Control), which has an inline
three-button remote/mic. As an iPhone/iPad/iPod user, the KTC version has become my PortaPro of choice. I was surprised
to see Koss give such a concession to smartphone modernity with a headphone as old school as the PortaPro, but Im
thrilled they did. Heres the rub, though: expect to pay at least $30 to $40 more for the KTC version, which Im guessing is
probably due to licensing costs associated with using the made-for-Apple three-button mic/remote design.
Looking for fun sound on the go? And served up with retro-hip style? Put the Koss PortaPro on your list.
The PortaPro is an age old design, but has held up over the years, despite newer portable cans coming along. Perhaps it
is the very age of the design that keeps people coming back to it... The sound is fun. The PortaPros have a nice, punchy
sound, and great bass for a small supra-aural set of phones.
Head-Fi member/reviewer TheWuss
KOSS PRODJ100
Closed, full-size, portable, around-the-ear headphone (around $80)
www.koss.com
Based on recommendations in Head-Fi community discussions, Im glad I nally experienced this headphone for myself, as
its not just one of the best value Koss headphones Ive heard, I think its one of the better headphone values in the sub-
$100 range, regardless of manufacturer.
Was this headphone designed with DJs in mind? Yes. Theres even a switch on it that lets you sum both channels to mono,
for one-ear listening. But do not let that DJ label trick you into thinking the PRODJ100 is a boomy, bloated headphone, as
DJ designated headphones more typically tend to be. The bass is impactful, but in no way overdone.
The PRODJ100 is a headphone that does a lot of things very well, even if it doesnt (to my ears) do anything exceptionally
well. Youll be hard pressed to nd another sub-$100 headphone that is so well-rounded, and so able to easily satisfy such
a wide variety of listening preferences. If the Shure SRH440 is a bit light in the bass for you, try the Koss PRODJ100. Are
the entry-level Grados a little too lively up top for you? Try the PRODJ100. You know what, just try the PRODJ100 regardless
of whatever other relatively affordable headphones you were already considering.
The best thing about this headphone is the quality of vocals. It just sounds amazing with both male and female vocals...You
feel like youre right there.
Head-Fi member/reviewer tdockweiler
14 15
Lets go waaay back to 2011, when Head-Fi turned a hearty ten years
old. Up to that point, in millions of posts, in untold thousands of
threads, in ten years of online headphone chatter, Philips rarely came
up in our discussions. Almost never, actually. Then, at CES 2012,
from seemingly out of nowhere, Philips unveiled several headphones
that hit it out of the park. Were talking really good headphones here.
Affordable. Awesome. Headphones.
The ones that wowed me the most were a few of their new over-ear
models. The rst two are from an affordable premium line of urban
headphones called CitiScape. The CitiScape Downtown (around $100)
is a closed on-the-ear model very uniquely styled, with a headband
wrapped in a padded cloth that looks like an elegant cravat, and
earpieces wrapped in a nice synthetic leather. The look, inspired by
New York casual street style, is graceful, modish, and suitable for men
and women alike. The Downtown is also one of the most comfortable
on-the-ear headphones Ive used.
The Downtown also sounds great, with a warmish tonal balance, but
still nicely detailed throughout. Bass is impactful, precise beyond
the price point, and emphasized mildly. Mids are smooth and nicely
present. Treble is on the softer side, but theres enough of it to give
just a hint of sparkle. Closed though it is, the Downtown images well,
too. At around $100, the Philips CitiScape Downtown is quite possibly
my favorite closed on-the-ear headphone at or under $100, providing
musicality and balance at a level well above its price, and with all
genres I listen to.
The Philips CitiScape Uptown (around $150) is the slightly upmarket
sibling of the Downtown, and is a closed around-the-ear headphone.
Like the Downtown, the Uptown is stylish, albeit with a completely
different, retro-cool style. The abundance of synthetic leather is nice
looking, and attractively tufted on the headbands underside.
Tonally, the Uptown, like the Downtown, has a warmer tendency, but
does have the advantage of having a touch more sparkle in the treble.
Like its sibling, the Uptown images nicely. Having used the Downtown
more at the beginning, switching to the Uptown revealed more of a
closed-cup resonance than is present with the Downtown. Its minor
enough, though, that its easy to hear past as you get accustomed to
the Uptown. Sonically, which do I prefer, the Downtown or Uptown?
Truth be told, its a toss-up for me. I also really like the Uptown, and
recommend it easily at its $150 price, but I think the Downtown at only
$100 is the even easier recommendation.
Both the Downtown and the Uptown have a feature called MusicSeal,
which is intended to keep the music in the headphone, and not
leaking out to bother those nearby. I havent examined or inquired
to nd out exactly how it works, but MusicSeal does work (and also
works to provide good isolation from outside noise). And both the
Downtown and the Uptown use at, tangle-resistant xed cables. The
Downtowns cable has an inline one-button remote/mic. The Uptowns
cable also has an inline one-button remote/mic, but with the
unfortunate addition of a useless analog super-short-throw sliding
volume control. I have no idea how such a useless volume control
made it past testing on the otherwise wonderfully executed Uptown,
but its hardly enough to dash my recommendation of it.
A huge piece of news, in my opinion, is that the Philips Citicape
line is slated to appear in not just big box electronics stores, but
also through some major department stores. That kind of channel
presence is big news with headphones that sound this good.
Fidelio is Philips agship audio brand, and the Philips Fidelio L1
(around $300) is the rst of the Fidelio headphones. The Fidelio L1
is, in my opinion, maybe the single best looking sub-$500 headphone
on the market today. To my eyes, theres no angleon the head or
off the headfrom which the Fidelio L1 doesnt look stunning. And
it feels just as impressive, with extensive use of real leather, protein
leather and aluminum. The design is a near-perfect blend of modern
and retro, and I still look admiringly at the L1 every single time I use it.
Coming from the left earpiece is a very short length of xed cable to
which can be attached two different headphone cable options, one
plain, and one with a three-button remote/mic. By the way, the L1s
three-button remote/mic cable is one of the best of its types that Ive
yet used, with easily distinguishable buttons, and nice positive clicks.
(The Fidelio L1 cables are fabric-lined.)
The Fidelio L1s sound signature is denitely on the warmer side,
but more rened, more polished than its CitiScape siblings. The L1s
bass is well north of neutral, but controlled enough to keep a lot of
the audiophile types <raises hand> happy. The mids are bloomy and
smooth; and the treble has nice presence (though Id prefer a more
extended sounding higher register). No, the Fidelio L1 is not a detail
freaks dream headphone, but still I nd it, overall, a very satisfying
headphone to listen to.
As far as headphones go, this is denitely a breakout year for Philips.
And, again, given the retail presence Philips has, these new headphones
are potentially very important for the industry, not just for Philips.
PHILIPS CITISCAPE DOWNTOWN, PHILIPS CITISCAPE UPTOWN, AND PHILIPS FIDELIO L1
CitiScape Downtown: Closed, full-size, on-the-ear headphone (around $150)
CitiScape Uptown: Closed, full-size, around-the-ear headphone (around $150)
Fidelio L1: Semi-open, full-size, around-the-ear headphone (around $300)
www.philips.com
PHIATON MS400
Closed, portable, around-the-ear headphone (around $230)
www.phiaton.com
Phiaton makes some of the most striking looking headphones, and the MS 400 is, to my eyes, the most fetching of their
many eye-catching designs. In a world littered with faux carbon ber, Phiaton elected to use real carbon ber, along with
an abundance of striking Ferrari-esque red leather.
Fortunately, the MS400 also sounds good.
Ive worn dozens of different headphones to work in the past several years and none of them gathered as dense of a
stream of interest, comments, and compliments as the Phiatons do. But of course even in a portable set sound quality
should come rst and the smooth and easy-going sound of the MS400 is very appealing in a portable. Like Ultrasone
and AKG, Phiaton seems to understand that bass notes are the rst to get drowned out on a busy city street, and the
MS400 do a great job of compensating. Those in search of a more analytical signature should probably look elsewhere.
For an involving, convenient, and strikingly beautiful audio experience on the go, however, the Phiatons come highly
recommended.
SENNHEISER HD 600 AND HD 650
Open, full-size, around-the-ear headphones (around $400 and $500, respectively)
www.sennheiser.com
Is there a more widely owned and lauded pair of headphones than the Sennheiser HD 6XX series in the world of high-end
audio? And all the acclaim for these headphones is absolutely deserved, earned over many years on the market. The
Sennheiser HD 600 and HD 650 both have sonic performance that can scale so far up in world-class rigs, I struggled with
whether or not to include them in the Summit-Fi (high-end audio) section instead.
Though detailed, both the HD 600 and HD 650 do not have the hyper detail that some of the newer breed of high-end
dynamic headphones have. Still, when Im listening to them, I dont nd myself longing for more (even though I know
headphones like its successor agship HD 800 can certainly give me more).
I think the magic of these headphones is that, in terms of detail and tonality, they can be like listening to good
loudspeakers, and theres instant comfort in that. Some nd this overly laid-back, but Im not one of them.
As for what differentiates these two headphones, the HD 650 is the slightly warmer of the two, and yet I personally nd it
more rened than the HD 600, especially in the upper registers. Theres no question that there are more similarities than
differences, so if youre already straining your budget, you can feel comfortable choosing the HD 600 to save some dough.
In my experience, getting the best out of the HD 600 and HD 650 absolutely requires the use of good headphone
amplication, so make sure to feed em right.
I quite like the Sennheiser sonic signaure, which many people refer to as being relaxed, or veiled. I think of it as being
very smooth and non-offensive. The treble and upper mids never get fatiguing or too bright, and the overall tonal balance
is very good, with nothing sticking out or recessed in any of the frequency ranges.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Rob Chang (Lunatique)
16
19
GET IN THE GAME.
While my avid gaming days have
long since passed, I still enjoy
giving my laptops video card
something to overheat about from
time to time. Favoring rst-person
shooters, imaging is important;
but as rusty as I am with games
nowadays, its mostly so that I
know precisely from which direction
death is raining down on me. (I
also use the headsets for telephony
and software speech recognition
dictation.)
Here are three headsets I feel
comfortable reccomending.
ASTRO GAMING A30
Closed, on-the-ear headset (around $130)
www.astrogaming.com
Popular with serious gamersboth amateurs and tournament players alikeAstro Gamings iconic
aghip, the enormous A40, is probably the single most recognizable gaming headset in the world. For
audio enthusiasts who only dabble in gaming, though, Id instead recommend the A40s littler sibling, the
Astro Gaming A30.
Versus the A40, the A30s sound signature, for music listening, is more balanced, more clear. And,
actually, even for gaming, I prefer the littler Astro, in terms of imaging and clarity (especially through
the upper mids and treble). The only thing I personally favor the A40s more for is comfort, the A40 being
around-the-ear, and the A30 being on-the-earbut, still, for an on-the-ear headphone, the A30 is
comfortable.
If youve seen the A40, you know that, even packed into its carrying case, its huge. The A30, however,
folds at, and tucks nicely into a reasonably compact carrying case. The A30 is also just a little over half
the weight of the A40.
The design of the A30 is, to my eyes, very attractive for a headset, even with its boom microphone
attached. I also nd it comfortable to wear for long sessions, although Id prefer earpad material with a
softer touch on the skin.
The A30s boom microphone is outstanding, specically in terms of vocal clarity, which makes it great
not just for communicating in a network gaming environment, but also for internet telephony, and speech
recognition dictation. (I get uncanny accuracy with the A30s microphone with Dragon Dictate.) Its
important to note, however, that the A30s microphone is tuned specically for voice clarity, and is not a
full range microphoneI would not recommend it as a podcasting headset.
18
BEYERDYNAMIC MMX 300
Closed, full-size, around-the-ear headset (around $400)
www.beyerdynamic.com
This imposing headset from beyerdynamic has earned many accolades with gamers everywhere, for combining the
sound quality and durability of beyerdynamics famed DT family of audiophile and pro audio headphones, along with
the expertise in headset communications from beyerdynamics aviation headset products.
The MMX 300 is among the most serious looking of all the gaming headsets Ive seen. It may be built for something
fun (gaming), but its styling seems to suggest very clearly that the MMX 300 is stony-faced serious about doing its
job very well.
Like the Astro A30, the MMX 300 is a closed headphone, but offers substantially more isolation than the A30 (and,
given its around-the-ear design, substantially more comfort, too). Its important to keep in mind that its also a very
large headset that doesnt fold at, and, even though its case is nice, the MMX 300 is still going to take up a lot of
space in your bag (assuming it ts in there at all).
The MMX 300 comes with a nice, small detachable in-line USB DAC with volume control and mute button. I like these
USB converters (my Sennheiser PC 166 USB came with one), and wish all wired gaming headsets had them included.
My experience with the MMX 300 is quite limited so far, but rst impressions included just what Id have expected
from beyerdynamic, which is excellent clarity, good bass, and brighter-than-neutral (but not edgy) top end. Also, the
microphone on the MMX 300 has a wider frequency response than the A30s, so the sound from it is more broadband,
more full, making the MMX 300 a candidate for podcasting duties.
I may have to add the MMX 300 to my arsenal as my primary closed headset of choice.
SENNHEISER PC 360 G4ME
Open, full-size, around-the-ear headset (around $250)
www.sennheiser.com
What a lot of Head-Fiers dont know is just how much experience Sennheiser has with communications products.
They make countless products at the center of which is voice clarity. And, like beyerdynamic, Sennheiser also makes
well-regarded aviation headsets. Now take all of their experience with the aforementioned, and couple it to Sennheiser
HD5XX family sound. What do you have? A killer headset.
If youve heard the Sennheiser HD 55X headphones, you have some idea of what to expect from the PC 360 in terms of
its sound signature with music. That kind of clarity and delity translates well to gaming, and its no surprise to see
some of the most serious gamers choosing audiophile-quality pieces by Sennheiser as their headsets of choice.
Unfortunately, the PC 360 G4ME does not come with a USB adapter, which, again, I wish all premium wired headsets
included. Though I could live without it, Ill poach the one from my PC 166 USB to use with the PC 360 when I desire
USB connectivity.
I expect the Sennheiser PC 360 G4ME will be my primary open headset of choice.
CUSTOMIN-EAR
UNIVERSALFIT
ABOUT CUSTOM-FIT
IN-EAR MONITORS
Like a bespoke suit, custom in-ear
monitors (IEMs) are made just for
you, molded to the exact shape of
your ears (usually by an audiologist).
And like a custom suit, custom IEMs
are exceptionally comfortable, and
usually trs expensive. To my ears,
the best custom IEMs are some of
the best sounding headphones of
any type currently available.
Whichever custom you choose,
expect to pay about an additional
$50.00 to get molds of your ears
made at a local audiologist (that you
will then send in to the IEM maker).
21
26
21
21
ULTIMATE EARS PERSONAL
REFERENCE MONITOR
Closed, custom-voiced custom in-ear monitors ($2,000)
www.logitech.com/ue
A custom-t IEM is custom-molded to your ears, so it will t only one person in the world perfectlyyou.
One would think, then, that a custom-t IEM is already as custom as it gets. Not anymore. Ultimate Ears
recently released what might reasonably be called a custom custom-t IEMone in which the physical
t isnt the only thing customized to t you, but also the sonic t. Its called the Ultimate Ears Personal
Reference Monitor, and, as its name suggests, you tune it to your own personal sonic preferences.
To accommodate this level of customization, a higher level of personal service is required. Once an order
for the Personal Reference Monitor is placed, the customer is assigned a personal service specialist to
guide him through the tting, design, and custom-tuning of the Personal Reference Monitor. The custom-
tuning of the Personal Reference Monitor involves a sit-down session with a device called the Ultimate
Ears Personal Reference Tuning Box. To start, there will be four locations in the U.S. equipped with the
Personal Reference Tuning box, in Irvine (California), Los Angeles, Nashville, and New York City. If you
dont happen to be lucky enough to be an easy trip away from one of these locations, Ultimate Ears is
currently working on making the tuning experience more accessible, in more places.
Simply put, my right ear is better than my left one. My right ear has greater acuity through some of the
mids and treble than my left. It has been this way for years. Using the Personal Reference Tuning Box, I
tuned my Personal Reference Monitor to help compensate for my left ears deciency (versus my right).
I also tuned the tonal balance to be neutralish, but with just a touch more bass than neutral, more
emphasis on the mids for greater midrange presence and bloom, and just a hairs breadth above neutral
in the treble region. The resulting monitorsmy Personal Reference Monitoris now my favorite of all
my custom in-ear monitors, imaging better (perhaps because of the left-right compensation), and suiting
my preferences more closely than any other custom in-ear I currently have.
I strongly recommend the Ultimate Ears Personal Reference Monitor for anyone whos wanted to try
compensating for differences between ones ears, and/or for anyone simply interested in reaching a higher
level of customizability in custom in-ear monitors.
(For more details about the product and the process, click here.)
ULTIMATE EARS CUSTOM IN-EAR REFERENCE MONITOR
Closed, custom in-ear monitors ($999)
www.logitech.com/ue
As UE (Ultimate Ears) puts it, the three-drivers-per-side Custom In-Ear Reference Monitor is designed for professional
studio engineers and producers for use during recording, mixing and mastering original music content. Other applications
include front of the house venue tuning, live recording and mixing. This is also an excellent product for the audiophile or
serious music listener because of its natural and authentic sound reproduction.
Given that description, it shouldnt be surprising that the IERM is the most neutral-sounding custom IEM Ive heard. Both
bass extension and treble extension sound excellent to me, the entire audioband presented without emphasis. The IERM
is one of my neutral references, and perhaps the most neutral of all my headphones (regardless of type). As such, it is my
sonic palate cleanserafter listening to more colored gear for extended periods, I can always count on the IERM to remind
me what neutral sounds like.
Imaging is also one of its strengths, the IERM edging out most of the other custom IEMs I use, in terms of presenting a
convincing, cohesive soundstage.
If youre in the market for a custom IEM, and pure neutrality is your goal, the IERM would be my rst recommendation.
All in all the UERM has a place among the other custom IEMs I have heard in the price range as it offers a reference
sound with an exceptional presentation; a combo I have not heard up to this point in a custom IEM. Combine that with
the accessories and cable and the UERM stands up well with the competition.
Head-Fi member/reviewer average_joe
WESTONE ES5
www.westonemusicproducts.com
If your tonal preference is more toward neutral, but not entirely so, then Westones agship ve-drivers-per-side ES5 is a
fantastic choice. It is more neutral than the JH13 Pro, but with richer midrange than UEs IERM. In terms of detail retrieval,
it is on par with the other agships.
Other major selling points of the ES5 include its comfort and isolation. Westones ES series of custom IEMs all have the
Westone heat-activated ex canal, which makes my ES5 one of the most comfortable IEMs Ive worn. That soft tip also
results in better isolation than most of my other custom-t IEMs provide.
Also, Westones ES5 packaging is second-to-none, with a Pelican case, and a very cool dessicant cylinder tted to the
interior of that case (to help keep your ES5 dry).
I would without a doubt recommend the Westone ES5 to anyone looking for a well balanced high-end custom IEM as I
feel they are simply breathtaking.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Tronz
22
FITEAR MH334
Closed, custom in-ear monitors ($1,800)
tear.jp
I thought I was aware of all the top custom-t IEM makers. On a recent trip to Tokyo, however, the gentlemen at Fujiya Avic
(a store every Tokyo-bound Head-Fier must visit) asked me to listen to a demo model of the FitEar MH334. To say the least,
I was impressed with what I heard. The next day, at the Tokyo Headphone Festival (which is put on by Fujiya Avic), I was
tted for my very own custom MH334.
When it arrived, the build quality was the rst thing I noticed, including the awless bubble-free transparent main
earpiece bodies and the well-dressed internal wiring.
Wearing the MH334 revealed the best isolating custom-t IEM Ive yet used. I dont know if its particularly outstanding
isolation is due to a perfect t, something specic to the MH334s construction, or both.
And the sound! Voiced by one of Japans top mastering engineers, the four-drivers-per-side MH334 is the best-sounding
IEM I have heard driven straight from my iPhone 4S (compared to others driven similarly), a nearly perfect blend of
revealing and smooth, impactful and balanced. Im looking forward to also using it in a wide variety of externally-amped
portable rigs.
Currently available only direct from FitEar, the only negative Ive got for the FitEar MH334 is its price, which, as of this
writing, translates to $1908! Im hoping FitEar soon nds broader distribution, as they may be poised to shake things up in
the custom-t IEM market, if this MH334 is any indication.
The detail and imaging is fantastic.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Sean (AnakChan)
These are some of the most transparent and linear IEMs Ive experienced. These are not basshead IEMs. They are not
colored or fun, but rather extremely accurate in conveying a recording. You wont get a single bit of extra bass emphasis
beyond what is there in a given track. That being said, tracks with a lot of bass are still rendered well, and I think the TG
334 handles most genres with ease.
Head-Fi member/reviewer MuppetFace
23
JH AUDIO JH13 PRO AND JH16 PRO
Closed, custom in-ear monitors (starting at $1,099 and $1,149, respectively)
www.jhaudio.com
Only three years old, but already a legend, JH Audios JH13 Pro is coming up against several new competitors in the cost-
no-object custom in-ear monitor realm, but its still the rst custom IEM I recommend for those who arent quite sure what
their preferred sound signature is. Why? Because I nd most people prefer mildly emphasized bass, which the JH13 Pro
has, along with neutral mids and treble, and quite possibly unmatched treble extension in an in-ear monitor. The JH13 Pro
sports six balanced armature drivers per side.
The JH16 Pro is the go-to custom for those who want more strongly emphasized bass (emphasis that Jerry Harvey made
sure to tune way down low, as it should be, and in such a manner that it leaves the mids virtually untouched). The JH16
Pro--because of that perfectly executed bass emphasis--is my go-to custom IEM for air or train travel, as extra bass is
always welcome in the din of those environments.
Each JH16 Pro earpiece contains eight balanced armature drivers. Yes, eight. How Jerry Harvey coaxes complete
cohesiveness from that many drivers (and, trust me, he does) is one of Head-Fis great mysteries, as far as Im concerned.
If you are in the market for a high-end headphone, stereo system, monitors for mixing, or custom IEMs, you should
consider the JH Audio JH 13 Pro. The accuracy and stereo imaging you get with the JH 13 Pros are worth every penny you
can nd. I know that the JH 13 Pro will make people rethink their collective headphones, if not customs in general - I
know I have.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Nicholas (Audioler)
The JH16 gives new meaning to bass with a performance that combines enhancement with dynamics, detail, punch,
speed, and rumble. Instrument detail is plentiful across the spectrum with an added liquidity to the vocal range and an
enhancement in the upper mids/lower treble that accentuates the clarity. Soundstage width is great and competes with/
bests similarly priced custom IEMs I have heard.
Head-Fi member/reviewer average_joe
24
UNIQUE MELODY MERLIN
www.custom-iem.com
I havent yet heard anything made by Unique Melody. But the guys from UM came all the way from Australia to exhibit at
2011 CanJam @Rocky Mountain Audio Fest in Denver; and several people whose ears I trust did listen to their demos in
Denver and told me very good things about what theyd heard.
I felt compelled, then, to search the forums to see how Unique Melody was faring within our community, and the answer is
very well, to say the least.
One of their products that I nd fascinating, in concept, is the Merlin custom-t IEM. Sporting a driver combination I think
is entirely unique to it, the Merlin has ve drivers per side, four of which are balanced armatures, and one of which is a big
dynamic driver. The Merlin is promoted as a bit of a sidestep from [Unique Melodys] house sound signature and heads on
into the world of unabated fun. The dynamic bass driver takes things down to 10Hz.
At RMAF, one of my buddies, grinning big, said of the Merlin, Did you hear the bass on those things?! I didnt, but Ill be
sure not to miss it next time.
This high end hybrid custom delivers on its promise of outstanding bass performance with very natural and well
balanced mids and highs. Soundstage is phenomenal and the entire presentation is somewhat unique.
Head-Fi member/reviewer John Grandberg (project86)

25
WESTONE 4R
Closed, in-ear monitor (around $500)
www.westone.com
The Westone 4R is one of my favorite universal-t IEMs (in-ear monitors), especially when Im looking for a more tonally at sound
signature. And the 4Rs detail retrieval is outstanding from bottom to top.
Across the audioband, the Westone 4R does not provide any specic area of emphasis, and certainly no over-emphasis. Bass
extends low, but without any extra weight imparted by the 4R. Though detailed throughout, I nd the 4Rs midrange detail to
be one of its greatest strengths--again, without any emphasis imparted to achieve it. The treble balance is also excellent, with
enough to provide some sparkle, but never enough to impart any edginess.
The 4R also is very comfortable to wear, with a surprisingly compact chassis (considering there are four drivers per side). Like
Westones other universal-t IEMs, it sits very at in the ear, which results in an IEM that can be worn while laying your head
down.
Put the Westone 4R at or near the top of your list if youre looking for a more neutral sound signature, but look elsewhere if you
prefer tonal emphasis of any kind (like bumped-up bass), as thats not what this IEM is about.
I have both the Westone 4 and the Westone 4R, and they sound the same to me. From what I can tell, the key difference is that the
Westone 4s cable is permanently afxed, whereas the 4Rs cable is detachable.
The new W4s nd themselves at the top of BA universal heap, having Dynamic Driver quality timbre; Drums sound absolutely
amazing on the W4. If you are looking for superb balance and rened detail retrieval, give the Westone 4 a try!
Head-Fi member/reviewer Shawn (Shotgunshane)
PORTABLE HEADPHONE AMPS DESIGNED FOR IEMs
www.ttvjaudio.com www.headamp.com www.raysamuelsaudio.com
In-ear monitors (whether universal-t or custom-t) often have a couple of things
in common: high sensitivity and good isolation from ambient noise. This presents
an interesting challenge to those devices driving them.
Whether an external headphone amplier or the built-in headphone output of
your digital audio player (be it a dedicated portable media player or smartphone),
many IEMs will quickly reveal any noise in the audio chain, as well as any
channel imbalance (especially at the lowest part of the volume range).
Three of most popular designed-for-IEM portable headphone amps in the Head-Fi
community are the TTVJ SLIM ($349), HEADAMP PICO SLIM ($399), and the
RAY SAMUELS AUDIO SHADOW($395). These amps maintain perfect channel
balance at any volume level, and virtually background-noise-free performance.
All three of these portable amps accomplish this with the use of stepped volume
controls and special attention to low circuit noise.
[The Pico Slim] is a very smooth and rened sounding portable, without any
edge or grain, and good extension in the bass and treble.
Head-Fi member/reviewer HeadphoneAddict
FEATURED PORTABLE AMPS
(from left to right)
Ray Samuels Audio Shadow
Headamp Pico Slim
TTVJ Slim
26
MONSTER MILES DAVIS TRUMPET AND MONSTER GRATITUDE
Closed in-ear monitors (around $350 and $200, respectively)
www.monsterproducts.com
If youve only listened to Monsters Beats line of headphones, you denitely have not heard the best headphones Monster
has to offer. In my opinion, the Monster Miles Davis Trumpet is their current best. Many simply refer to it as the
Trumpet, and the Trumpet has substantially trumped the Turbine Pro Copper, in my opinion, as the best of Monsters
in-ear lineup.
Some might consider the Trumpets styling gauche in its literalness. The outside ends of the earpieces arent merely
inuenced by a trumpets mouthpiece, they look just like Lilliputian trumpet mouthpieces. With some of the Trumpets
included eartips, the main ange towards the ear looks like a trumpet with a mute inserted. Its three-button remote/mic
buttons look like itsy-bitsy replicas of the buttons atop a trumpets valves. And, like a brand new trumpet, the Monster
Miles Davis Trumpet is gleaming with polished metallic surfaces. Maybe its because its so out-there, maybe its because
Im such a huge Miles Davis fan, but I love the way the Trumpet looks.
The Trumpets design is unique beyond its appearance, too. It has a driver-forward design that pushes the Trumpets
dynamic drivers out to the ends of the earpieces, closer to the inner ears. This shifts the weight forward, so that that the
earpieces are less likely to break seal or fall out.
Most importantly, Im impressed with the way the Trumpet sounds. It has, of all the headphones Ive heard so far from
Monster, the most audiophile-friendly tonal balance. Bass extension is good; but, in a departure from most of Monsters
other headphones, the Trumpet has comparatively mild bass emphasis (and with good extension). I also nd its treble
more rened than the Coppers. Soundstaging is also good, with a much wider presentation than I might otherwise
expect from an in-ear that places its drivers deeper in the ears than most other dynamic driver in-ears do. Relative to
the Copper, which I still enjoy, the Miles Davis Trumpet simply sounds more serious, less funand I mean that as a very
positive nod in the Trumpets favor.
If you want something more balanced than the Turbine Pro Copper, but with more bass emphasis and more fun than the
Trumpet, then consider my second favorite Monster in-ear, the Monster Gratitude. Inspired by the music of Earth, Wind
& Fire (and, of course, endorsed by them), the Gratitude might be the best value in the Monster line, and an outstanding
value, period. To my ears, the Gratitude sounds like an evolution of the agship Monster Turbine Pro models, but can
generally be found for a signicantly lower price than the Turbine Pro Gold, and far less than the Turbine Pro Copper. To
me, the Gratitude is a sign that Monster is stepping up its game, in terms of performance and value.
In terms of packaging, Monster really hits it out of the park with both the Trumpet and the Gratitude. Both come with
very nice carrying cases, the Trumpet comes with a special edition CD of Miles Davis Sketches of Spain album, and both
come with a rather staggering array of eartips, all showcased in cool hinged heavy-duty boxes youll probably never throw
away. With such an impressive in-box collection of eartips, its obvious Monster is very serious about making sure the
user can nd a good t right off the bat (which so important to both sound and comfort with in-ears).
The brilliant vocals, the added benet of the control talk, the great blend of bass that boasts both quantity/quality,
and the rather neutral presentation are all winners in my book. I really cant stress the mids; theyre just beautiful!
Head-Fi member/reviewer i2ehan
28
Audioy is about our rst and only love, music.
Were a team of designers, craftsmen and musicians with an old-school attention to detail; we
build premium products allowing you to experience music in its truest form.
audiofly.com
AF78
A duet of technologies: dynamic driver and balanced armature driver.
Our AF78 is your ticket to truly sophisticated sound
Dynamic driver and balanced armature driver
Noise isolating silicon tips and Comply
TM
foam tips
Audioex
TM
twisted core braided cable with CORDURA fabric
Durable storage tin
Premium accessories included
Clear-Talk
TM
mic (optional)
never miss a beat
af33
MEET THE REST OF THE FAMILY...
af45 af56
SPIDER REALVOICE
Closed, in-ear, vertical earphone (around $90)
www.spidercable.com
The rst time I heard the realvoice was at the recent CanJam @Rocky Mountain Audio Fest, and I have to admit I was
surprised. I know Spiders initial line of business was cables--HDMI cables, audio/video cables, and even some little odds-
and-ends accessories. I assumed the earphones were just a me-too endeavor. However, in a meeting with Spiders Ronny
Tsai, he indicated theyre serious about our space. A prototype he let me listen to (any details of which I cant yet discuss)
was outstanding, and convincing proof to support that Spider is doing far more than just dipping its toes in headphones.
As for products currently available, the Spider realvoice earphone is an impressive start, even at $90. Its largish appearance
gave me pause at rst, but it turns out I was able to get an easy, rm t from the get-go. And the sound? Smooth, but with
good detail, and denitely some bass emphasis, the overall tilt being on the warmer, fun side. And I was surprised by its
soundstage, which was actually quite impressive for a $90 in-ear.
PHONAK AUDO PFE 232
Closed, in-ear monitor ($599)
www.audeoworld.com
Swiss-engineered, with custom-spec, balanced armature drivers, the dual-driver Audo PFE 232 may surprise a lot of people.
For starters, its $599, which puts it squarely in the category of very expensive, as far as universal-t IEMs go. Still, I expect a
lot of people who hear the PFE 232 will nd its performance justies the price.
How does the PFE 232 sound? Thats sort of a trick question, as one can customize the sound of it by swapping out three
different sets of passive lters (included). The green lter provides extra bass, the black lter enhances perception of bass
and treble, and the gray lter (which comes installed) is for enhanced perception of the mid-frequencies. I prefer the gray
lter (its the most even-keeled of the three). Whichever you choose, you get a different avor of what is unquestionably the
best dual-driver universal-t IEM Ive yet heard--detailed, delicate, yet fun.
How does one justify a universal-t IEM that gets into custom IEM price territory? The outstanding delity of the PFE
232, combined with the exibility of the lter system (which means youll have a greater chance of nding your preferred
signature), makes it a compelling choice, even at the price.
The overall sound of the PFEs amazes with its smoothness and clarity. The bass is tight and accurate. The mids are somewhat
liquid and very well-positioned in being neither forward nor recessed. The treble is similarly accurate and quite enjoyable... the
year-old Phonak PFEs still amaze with their incredibly coherent presentation and musical sound signature.
30
SHURE SE425
www.shure.com
Many a veteran Head-Fier has cut his teeth on high-end in-ear monitors with Shure. Among the rst to push multi-
armature IEMs into the mainstream, Shures latest generation SE in-ear monitors are outstanding.
As far as performance for the price, the sweet spot of the line is, to me, the SE425. For around $300, the SE425 serves
up a decidedly audiophile-friendly signature, with its specialty being the sweet and detailed midrange that Shure
has become known for. Bass extension and impact is good, and on the more neutral side. Treble is good, but some
(including me) might nd it could use just a touch more sparkle.
The SE425 is very comfortable, and I really like the detachable cable, and the cable plugs 360-degree swivel (which
helps prevent annoying cable twisting).
The 425s are a really good iem - well designed and built (these will last for years), superbly comfortable and really
smooth and detailed. The mids are the strongest point - but the entire sound to me is balanced and relaxed.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Paul Brooks (brooko)
ETYMOTIC ER-4PT
www.etymotic.com
Ask the most veteran Head-Fiers what their rst good in-ear monitor was, and the answer you may get back more than
any other would be the Etymotic ER-4 (either the ER-4S or the ER-4P). The latest version of the ER-4 from Etymotic
Research is the ER-4PT.
With a single balanced armature driver per side, the ER-4 is, in the opinion of many experienced audiophiles, one of the
standards (of any type of headphone) for neutral tonal balance. You want booming bass, extra sparkle in your treble, or
extra-rich mids? Look somewhere else.
Also, if you like the maximum amount of isolation from ambient noise, the Etymotic ER-4--with the included triple-
ange tips--are rated for 35dB to 42dB of isolation. I dont know of any other IEM (universal-t or custom) that
provides more isolation from outside noise.
The ER-4PT is simply a modernized version of the legendary Etymotic ER-4, from the company who started so many
audiophiles (including yours truly) down the road of high-end in-ear monitors.
There is just no way not to be blown away with the level of detail these things put out...the Etymotics smack you in the
face with it.
31
HIFIMAN RE-262
www.head-direct.com
The HiFiMAN RE-262 has a somewhat unorthodox look, and an even more unique sound signature. Rich and
sweet, the RE-262 has magical midrange, and an eminently musical quality that I think many would nd
immediately seductive. The bass extension is good, but some may nd it on the lighter side. The RE-262s
treble is nicely textured and smooth. But, again, that midrangethe emphasis there lends a lusher tint to
the overall presentation, and I love it. Its like a little taste of tube soundliquid single-ended triode tube
soundsomehow packaged into diminutive IEMs.
Though the RE-262s chassis looks rather different from most of the IEMs on the market, you get used to it
quickly, and it is very easy to insert into your ears. I also nd the RE-262 very comfortable for long-term wear.
Keep in mind that though the RE-262 isolates, I dont nd it to isolate quite as much as much of its IEM
competition.
The midrange is where its at; its sophisticated and beautiful. Vocals carry amazing intimacy that are very
addicting, engrossing and full of emotion. The entire midrange is velvety smooth with excellent clarity and
detail. Every little detail of the midrange is easily discovered. Singers lips parting, the inhaling of breath,
inections from the throat are beautifully rendered.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Shawn (Shotgunshane)
Aside from the seductively uid midrange the biggest strength of the RE262 for me is the presentation. The
earphones boast both and excellent soundstage and headstage still a relatively rare occurrence in the
IEM realm... It really gives a great sense of ambient space without losing track of individual instruments or
diluting other location cues. Positioning is helped by good -- perhaps even excessive layering; the RE262
really leaves no doubts as to what is in a tracks foreground and what is in the background.
32 33
MOSHI AUDIO CLARUS
Closed, in-ear, earhook-type headphone (around $200)
http://moshimonde.com
First of all, the Moshi Audio Clarus comes in one of the best-executed fancy little boxes Ive seen in quite a while. Once
youre past the outer cardboard bits, the Clarus product packaging looks more the part of a small museum display
than something youd pick off a store shelfeven the clear plastic they use to make the Clarus look like its oating in
mid-air seems to be of a higher-than-average grade to help accomplish the illusion.
The appearance and build of the Clarus itself only accentuates the fancy feeling unboxing experience. The Clarus is
largely made of a steel alloy, with styled creases and folds that give it a sort of origami appearance. Its very attractive
to look at, feels substantial in the hands, and looks good on the head, too.
Fortunately the Clarus has the sonic chops to merit the packaging. While it likely wont open up sonic vistas that
experienced Head-Fiers havent yet heard, it will be clear to even grizzled Head-Fi veterans that this is a headphone
voiced to appeal to audio enthusiasts. Theres enough mid-bass emphasis, though, to still keep the general consumer
market happy.
Overall, the Moshi Clarus balance is on the warmer side, with the weightiness of its midbass prominent, but never
overwhelming to me. The mids are also warm, and treble extension is good, though certainly not soaring. This kind of
tonal balance works well for me when on the go (I like some bass emphasis when Im out and about).
The Clarus specications list a two-way dynamic driver in each ear (consisting of a 7mm treble drive, 15mm woofer).
However this two-way driver is congured (I havent seen it), it presents itself as tonally coherent.
Moshi describes the Clarus ear coupling as loose-t silicone designed to rest on the cusp of the ear canals, not
inside of them, thereby eliminating ear fatigue. And the Clarus is very comfortable. I can easily wear it for hours. (You
do sacrice some isolation for the loose-t comfort, though.) Ive found its earhook design to be eyeglass friendly,
whether Im wearing thick plastic frames or thin metal ones. And the Clarus feels light when worn.
The Clarus also has an in-line three-button remote/mic cable, which, as an iPhone/iPod/iPad user, is a great bonus in
a portable headphone.
The Moshi Clarus is a wonderful choice for a portable on-the-go headphone, and it was a pleasant surprise for me, as I
was previously unfamiliar with Moshi.
VELODYNE VPULSE
http://www.velodyne.com
It seems everyone and his subsidiaries want to peddle headphones nowadays, with loudspeaker manufacturers
seemingly unable to resist the call. One such entry in the last several months that I found particularly interesting:
Velodyne. Sure, their subwoofers have been well regarded for years, but I was intrigued to nd out how a company
that essentially specializes in the spectrum below 200Hz (and often well below 20Hz) would do with their rst
headphone. As it turns out, theyve done very well.
One might think that a subwoofer company would choose a bass-emphasized tonal balance with their rst
headphone, and, indeed, it did. One might fear that a subwoofer company might overdo that bass, but thankfully
it didnt. The vPulses bass is emphasized, and sounds to me to be centered in the deep bass region, without
adulterating the mids. In fact, the vPulses mids and treble seem to breathe freely, and the overall balance is just
what Id want when I feel like listening to a bass-emphasized in-ear. The vPulses resolution is good, but dont buy
the vPulse if youre a detail freak. Soundstaging is good, but, again, if this is your lead criterion, the vPulse may
not win you over.
The vPulse looks very nice and stylish (and youthful) in blue (its also available in a more conservative black/
silver), and has a very nice three-button inline remote/mic. The vPulse is an outstanding value at around $90.
The rst in-ear earphone from the bass experts at Velodyne, the vPulse does a good job of combining user-
friendliness and functionality in a single package. While the design is derivative in many ways, the vPulse has a
lot going for it - tangle-resistant cables, low microphonics, comfortable angled-nozzle earpieces, and a 3-button
remote are all standard features. The sound combines solid bass rumble and depth with slightly subdued but still
clean and detailed mids and highs. The bass can be a touch overpowering on some tracks but normally remains
well-behaved for such a bassy earphone, making the vPulse highly suitable for anyone in search of a reasonably-
priced headset with plentiful rumble and power.
34 35
SONY XBA-3IP
Closed, in-ear monitor (around $250 to $300)
http://www.sony.com
Last year, Sony announced seven new headphone models (constituting 11 total new SKUs) using balanced armature (BA)
drivers. I havent heard them all, but, of the ones I did hear, the XBA-3iP was the one that most caught my attention.
Unlike most manufacturers that source balanced armature drivers from other companies, my understanding is that
Sony developed their own BAs. Using three of their new BA drivers per side in the XBA-3iP, Sony has achieved a level of
renement and balance with the XBA-3iP that some companies have taken years to realize.
The XBA-3iP also has a very nice form factor, with earpieces that look simple and elegant, and with a nice shape thats
very easy to grab between your thumb and forenger for very quick and easy ear insertion.
With weighty yet detailed bass, neutralish (if somewhat subdued) mids, and detailed, well-extended neutral-balanced
treble, the XBA-3iP is a very good universal-t in-ear monitor. While it doesnt quite reach the performance heights (to my
ears) of the Westone 4R or Phonak Audo PFE232, it also doesnt reach their price strata. At its price point, the XBA-3iP
has become one of my favorite universal-t IEMs.
(There is also a version without the three-button remote/mic called the XBA-3, which is priced around $200 to $230.)
THINKSOUND MS01
http://www.thinksound.com
Big sound. Small footprint. Thats thinksounds motto, their mission statement being to create incredible sounding
headphones with the smallest eco-footprint possible. At a time when so many of us are becoming increasingly conscious
about how we impact the environment, how could I not include something from thinksound in this guide? This was made
even easier by the fact their agship product, the ms01, sounds quite good for its street price of around $100.
The eco-friendly vibe is strong with this one, with extensive use of natural-color cardboard, and very minimal use of
plastic. The carrying case is also a simple unbleached cotton drawstring pouch. Each earpiece consists of a beautiful
brown wood housing with gunmetal-colored aluminum bafes. At rst glance, the aluminum bafes look like something
hammered to shape. The cables are tangle-resistant and PVC-free. Aesthetically, the ms01 is a very simple, elegant
design. Im not sure why, but every time I look at the ms01, I think of little craft art shops in Bridgetown, Barbados, and
that makes me smile.
The ms in ms01 stands for monitor series, and I can see where theyre coming from with that label, especially for
how it sounds relative to most other in-ears in its price range, which tend to be either bass-heavy or bass-and-treble-
heavy. The ms01 takes a rather even-keeled approach to its tonal balance, with impactful, fast bass, good clarity through
the midrange, and what sounds to me like a dash of treble emphasis, but thankfully not in the sibilance range. The ms01
also images nicely.
On sound alone, its a worthy competitor at its price. Throw its eco-cool spirit into the mix, and it becomes more of a
standout in an increasingly crowded space.
BE AMAZED.
If you were under the impression
that there was no such thing as
good wireless headphoneslet
alone outstanding onesthen
connect yourself to your music only
via the ether tether of the following
headphones. Youll be amazed.
37
SENNHEISER RS 220
Closed, around-the-ear, wireless headphone (around $599)
www.sennheiser.com
This headphone is a remarkable feat of engineeringa solid bridge between wireless freedom and wired delity.
If this was easy to do at a reasonable price, it would have been done before, many times overand that hasnt
happened, because it most certainly is not easy to do. Not surprisingly, it took Sennheiser to do it.
Prior to the RS 220, Sennheiser made valiant strides toward this end, especially with the RS 170 and RS 180, both
impressive Kleer-equipped wireless headphones (and both still available). Impressive as the RS 170 and RS 180
were, however, they were a different avor of awesome, that avor being outstanding-for-wireless headphones;
whereas the RS 220 is an outstanding headphone, period, even by wired standards.
The RS 220s low-latency, bit-perfect wireless transmission means full preservation of dynamic range, and this
probably helps explain one area (but certainly not the only area) the RS 220 simply outclasses all other wireless
headphonesdiaphanous, delicate detail. Its macrodynamic abilities are also outstanding, but keep in mind
that the RS 220 maxes out at 106 decibels (which is plenty high enough for me, and I certainly hope for you, too).
The RS 220 has become my most-used full-sized over-ear headphone, as it gives me the freedom to move around
my home ofce area, moving from my desk to my chaise to my sofa, with delity that evokes the sound of a nicely
driven Sennheiser HD 600.
After so many years of expecting this kind of sound only from wired headphones, I still nd myself motioning with
my hands to move the non-existent headphone cables out of the way as I adjust my seating position. And I still
regularly take the RS 220 headphone off my head when I get up from my ofce chair, forgetting its wireless.
RS 220. MM 450-X. Yes, I think it safe to say that, right now, Sennheiser rules the roost in the world of wireless
headphones, whether at home or on the go.

SENNHEISER MM 450-X TRAVEL
Closed, on-the-ear, portable, wireless Bluetooth headphone (street price around $450.00)
www.sennheiser.com
My experience with stereo Bluetooth headphones had not been at all encouraging until I came across the MM
450 Travel. And, recently, Sennheiser further improved this headphone with the MM 450-X. This feature-packed
closed-back headphone is far and away the best sounding Bluetooth stereo headphone I have ever heard. No,
you wont mistake it for Sennheisers agship HD 800, but you also wont believe your music is being piped to you
through Bluetooth.
The MM 450-X also has very good active noise cancellation (no, not as good as the Bose QC15s noise
cancellation, but still very good), can be used passively (via an included cable) when the battery dies (or when
youd rather not drain its rechargeable battery), includes a very nifty TalkThrough feature that allows you to hear
the world around you (using its built-in stereo microphones), can be used as a Bluetooth headset, and has control
buttons with which to easily control your calls and music.
New with the MM 450-X is support for the hi- apt-X audio codec, for improved sound quality with other apt-
X-supported devices). In case your computer doesnt support apt-X, pick up the $60 Sennheiser BTD 500 USB
dongle, which will give your Windows or Mac computer apt-X, A2DP and HSP capabilities. Another improvement
Ive found with the MM 450-X (versus the MM 450) is a lower noise oor when used wirelessly, and/or with active
noise-cancellation enabled.
Ive logged many thousands of miles of travel with the Sennheiser MM 450 Travel (and will likely log even more
with the MM 450-X), and it has been fantastic for use on buses, planes and trains. Of all the active noise-
cancelers that Sennheiser currently offers, the MM 450-X offers the best balance of portability, utility and sound,
in my opinion.
(We discussed the Sennheiser MM 450 Travel in Episode 007 of Head-Fi TV.)
SLEEK AUDIO CT7 W-1 WIRELESS CUSTOM
Closed, Kleer wireless, custom in-ear monitors (starting around $800) Pictured at right.
www.sleekaudio.com
Until I heard the Sennheiser RS 220, the best-sounding wireless headphones Id heard all used Kleer wireless
technology. Ive heard a prototype of Sleek Audios universal-t in-ear Kleer wireless system, and it was extremely
impressiveand that was a few years ago.
A Sleek Audio Kleer wireless system is available with Sleek Audios CT7 custom-t in-ear monitor earpieces. The
CT7 has been well reviewed on Head-Fi (in both wired and wireless setups), and Sleek has had a few years since
last I heard their prototype to further rene their wireless rigs.
A wireless custom-t IEM? I dont think Ill be able to resist.
NOTE: For the CT7, expect to pay about an additional $50.00 to get molds of your ears made at a local audiologist
(that you will then send in to Sleek Audio).
38 39
The CT7s midrange follows its
bass. It is forward, edgy, and
fun. Its got detail. Its got space.
Its got bite. It even has softness
where needed. You can hear very
clearly the small wet sounds of
the mouth, stray breaths into the
microphone, the gnarled strings
of a guitar. Its all there.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Shigzeo
HEADPHONE AMPS &
OTHER HEAD-FI GEAR
There is a lot of other gear
discussed by Head-Fiers other than
headphones, including amps to
power those headphones, digital-
to-analog converters (DACs), other
source components to feed the amps
that power those headphones, other
audio accessories, and occasionally
even loudspeakers for when we dont
feel like listening to headphones.
SCHITT AUDIO VALHALLA AND
WOO AUDIO WA5
DESKTOPAMPS
HEADPHONECABLES
PORTABLEAMPS
BUDAUDAC
DESKTOPAUDIO
COMPUTERAUDIO
PORTABLEDEVICES
42
44
46
47
51
52
59
41
DESKTOP HEADPHONE AMPLIFIERS
At the 2011 CanJam at Rocky Mountain Audio Fest, I plugged the Audeze LCD-3 into the solid state APEX HIFI
AUDIO BUTTE ($495), www.ttvj.com, and smiled big. Physically, the Butte is unimposing. Aesthetically, its
unassuming. Sonically, it drove the LCD-3 beautifully and transparently, allowing the new Audeze agship do its thing,
unembellished, unencumbered.
Several Head-Fiers were gathered round it at one point, toward the end of the show, and every single one of us walked
away impressed by the combo. Knowing that the LCD-3 was in my immediate future, I knew the Butte had to be, too, so
I ordered one on the spot.
Right away I found this amp to be neutral and smooth. Transparency and midrange clarity are delivered in spades
with the Butte. These are the major strengths of the Butte. The midrange is where a lot of the magic happens for many
of us and I found the Buttes midrange to be natural and uncolored. You can push this amp without any signicant
edginess/harshness at the top or bloat at the bottom. There is no chance of amp-induced fatigue here.
Head-Fi member/reviewer John White (WNBC)
Another affordable desktop amp I use and recommend is the SCHIIT AUDIO VALHALLA ($349), www.schiit.com,
which is a Class-A, single-ended triode amp. Its an affordable trip into beautiful tube sound, and with good exibility,
supporting headphones with nominal impedance of 32-600 ohms.
Here is what the Valhalla is: an outstanding sounding headphone amp for the money. Its dynamic, essentially
transparent, and essentially neutral.
Head-Fi member/reviewer skylab
In the context of the Sennheiser HD 800 (which itself is priced at around $1,500), we have to adjust the denition of
affordable a bit. With that in mind, the best affordable tube amp Ive used with the HD 800 happens to be the RAY
SAMUELS AUDIO RAPTOR ($1,175), www.raysamuelsaudio.com. This is a glorious pairing, and Ive brought it with
me to two CanJam at RMAF events to let others hear it, too.
On of the best tube amps Ive heard, in a variety of rigs, is the WOO AUDIO WA 5 LE (starting at $2,500), www.
wooaudio.com, a two-chassis, single-ended triode, transformer-coupled, Class-A headphone amp that uses the
venerable 300B tube. I personally love the sound of a great 300B amp, and the WA 5 LE is a great 300B amp. Though I
dont have one yet, that may have to change. As is customary with Woo, the WA 5 LE uses point-to-point wiring.
It generates an alternate place. A place with grand authority. A place you can visit and stay if you want. There is no ear
fatigue even after long 4-5 hour listening runs. Just a big place where the sound stage goes off into innity.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Redcarmoose
42
DESKTOP HEADPHONE AMPLIFIERS (CONTINUED)
One of the most acclaimed cost-no-object high-end amps on Head-Fi has been the EDDIE CURRENT BALANCING ACT
($3,950), www.eddiecurrent.com, a fully-balanced tube headphone amp and preamp that also uses 300B tubes. Many
seasoned Head-Fiers consider the Balancing Act one of the best amps available at any price, and my experience with it (at
shows) makes it obvious why. At the most recent CanJam at Rocky Mountain Audio Fest, I heard the Balancing Act paired with
the Audeze LCD-2 for the rst time, and that rig was simply out of this world.
The Balancing Act is also one of the most beautiful headphone amps on the market, that cant even be fairly described as
simply retro. The chassis lines, the old-fashioned control knobs and indicator lampcombined with the prominently placed
vacuum tubesresult in a look at seems very completely from another era. Simply gorgeous.
The dynamic capabilities of the BA are excellent from throughout the entire audible range. The BAs resolution and ability to
extract low level information is also excellent.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Marv (Purrin)
While were on the subject of gorgeous ampsand returning to solid statethe SPL (SOUND PERFORMANCE LAB)
PHONITOR (around $2150), spl.info, might very well be the best-looking solid state headphone amplier on the market.
Fortunately, it has the performance to match, being one of only a couple of solid state ampliers Ive used that I feel matches
well with the HD 800.
The Phonitor also has the best, most comprehensive, tonally neutral crossfeed Ive yet used. Its crossfeed exibility puts the
Phonitor at the forefront of headphone imaging coherence and accuracy, and its an amp I may have to add to one of my
reference systems. (We discussed the SPL Phonitor in Episode 009 of Head-Fi TV.)
This is an excellent piece of high quality machinery and anyone with the proper equipment to take advantage of it will
be absolutely glad they have it. This will undoubtedly be able to power anything you can throw at it without a hitch, while
providing a great sound.
Head-Fi member/reviewer keanex
Another fantastic solid state headphone ampand my current personal reference amp to use with the HiFiMAN HE-500, Audeze
LCD-2 and LCD-3is the fully balanced RAY SAMUELS AUDIO APACHE ($2,995), www.raysamuelsaudio.com. (The
Apache is also a preamp.) Though it works well with a great number of headphones, driving those particular planar magnetic
models seems to be the Apaches fortelike it was made especially for them.
The Apache is, as I dene it, completely transparent, to a degree I have not heard before in a headphone amp. No grain, no
noise, no haze just a completely wide open window to the music. I hesitate to even call it a window. The Apache put me IN
the music in a way no other headphone amp has.
One of the most popular modications Head-Fiers make to their high-end headphones is to replace their stock
cables. Headphones with removable cableslike the HD 800, HD 6XX, LCD-2/3, HE Series planars, and many
othersare just begging Head-Fiers to go for that easy upgrade.
The Head-Fiers desire to recable--combined with the fact that many Head-Fiers also own several different kinds
of ampsled companies like ALO Audio (www.aloaudio.com) and Moon Audio (www.moon-audio.com) to come up
with universal headphone cables that have detachable adapter ends that allow the heaphone to be used with just
about any amp made without having to swap out the main cable.
Mini plugs, 1/4 plugs, dual 3-pin XLR, the proprietary plug required for use with the SR-71B / Rx Mk3I use all of
these. Every replacement headphone cable I order from now on will be the universal adapter-end type.
(See previous page for photos.)
45
l abkabl e. com
PORTABLE HEADPHONE AMPLIFIERS
It seems there are innite choices now, when it comes to portable headphone ampliers. The portable amp Im
most impressed by at the moment is ALO AUDIOS UPCOMING RX MK3 ($650), www.aloaudio.com, which
is a fully balanced, portable beast of an amp, and the rst to challenge the RAY SAMUELS AUDIO SR-71B
($650), raysamuelsaudio.com, in terms of the ability to authoritatively drive any dynamic headphone, up to and
including the HiFiMAN HE-6. I had an early prototype of the Rx Mk3 here for a while, and did not want to return it.
Subsequent listens to later prototypes at CanJam @RMAF, and then the Tokyo Headphone Festival, had shown it
to be increasingly rened as it approached its production state. In its production state (which I havent yet heard),
kudos for it has reached fever pitch.
In addition to its revealing sound signature, and having extraordinary driving power for a portable amp, the Rx
Mk3 adds a very well implemented bass control. I dont know the exact specs of this bass control yet, but it was
extremely effective and rened (it was great for giving thinner-sounding headphones more low-frequency body), and
it only seemed to have an effect on bass, leaving the mids alone. This is one of the products Im eagerly awaiting,
and I already have an order in.
The PRACTICAL DEVICES XM6 (starting at $395), www.practicaldevices.com, is my current go-to portable
amp/USB DAC combo. Its list of features is almost too long to list here, but includes adjustable crossfeed, bass
boost, treble boost, output impedance adjustment, adjustable gain, media control dial, and more. The USB DAC
section is also very good for something of this size (I ordered the Wolfson WM8741 upgrade option). We discussed
the Practical Devices XM6 in Episode 002 of Head-Fi TV.)
I love this amp--it goes with me to work every day, and I use it at home if Im away from my main rig for whatever
reason. If youve done your research, checked out the competition, have cash to spare, and love lots of features, go
for it.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Colin (Metalsonata)
If youre in need of even more affordable portable amp/DAC solutions, make sure to check out the offerings from
IBASSO (www.ibasso.com), and FIIO (www.io.com.cn), both of which offer a strong selection of outstanding
value-priced portable amps and amp/DAC combos. Though my experience with iBasso and FiiO products is currently
limited, I expect to have more to say about some of their products in the next Gift Guide update.
(Also make sure to see the In-Ear Headphones section to see some of my favorite portable amps for driving in-ear
monitors specically.)
S P O NS O R E D B Y
46 47
HEADROOM BUDA + UDAC PACKAGE
Desktop, fully-balanced headphone amplier and DAC combo
($2679 as a system; or, individually, $1699 for the Balanced Ultra Desktop Amp, and $1199 for the Ultra Desktop DAC)
www.headphone.com
HeadRoom has been a part of several personal headphone hi- milestones in my life. Back before Head-Fi.org even existed,
I won a HeadRoom-sponsored contest that supplied me with my rst high-end headphone rig (HeadRoom Max headphone
amplier and Sennheiser HD 600 headphone). Soon after I started Head-Fi.org, HeadRoom was the rst company to offer
sponsorship support. And when I was still of the mind that computer audio wasnt worth my time, Tyll Hertsens (founder of
HeadRoom and now of InnerFidelity) stopped by my ofce with one of HeadRooms rst high-end USB DAC products, which
convinced me to delve into computer audio (and from which Ive not looked back).
Over 11 years after having won that rig, HeadRoom still has it goin on! The latest BUDA + UDAC combo is an outstanding
rig, and can drive most any headphone beautifully, authoritatively. Their early roots in the USB DAC game have proved
fruitful, and their latest DAC is now engineered around the ESS9018 SABRE DAC/processor. The result is an ultra-resolving
DAC that has impressed me whenever Ive heard it in meet conditions (and which I really should spend time with in my
personal systems).
As for HeadRooms amps, there are few companies who can claim deeper roots in headphone amp design and engineering
than HeadRoom. From HeadRooms description of the BUDA:
The Balanced Ultra Desktop Amp incorporates our best Max electronics modules employing Burr-Brown OPA627 within
buffer and summing stages plus a Walter Jung Diamond Buffer-based discrete component output power amp stage
lovingly hot-rodded and tweaked by HeadRoom audio engineers. All active amp stages are fully biased into power-hungry
Class-A operation, resulting in spectacularly smooth, intensely high-denition natural sound reproduction.
And that is the hallmark of HeadRooms amps, in my experience: An ease and naturalness that only the best solid state
amps, or good tube amps, tend to exhibit.
If you know the people at HeadRoom, you know they have an intense passion for what they do (and loads of fun doing it),
and it shows in their products. That passion is part of what makes HeadRoom one of the legendary marks in our space.
(I still have that HeadRoom Max I won in the contest; and more than ten years later, its still an impressive piece.)
Personalize Your Setup
We listen to a lot of music in our shop and weve each found a
different everday set-up. Heres what we like. Find yours.
Caleb
iPod Classic
Continental V2
Cricket LOD
ALO SXC for Fit Ear
Fit Ear ToGo 334
Ken
iPod Classic
Rx MK3-b
Algorhythm Solo
SXC 22 Interconnects
SXC 22 Lariat
Audeze LCD-3
Josh
iPod Classic
Rx MKII
Triple Pipe LOD
Salty Pepper
Modifed Beyerdynamic T-70p
JD
iPod Classic
National
Low Rider LOD
Copper 22 Lariat
HE-400
ALOaudio.com #mysetup share yours
WHEREVER THE MUSIC TAKES YOU
Caleb Ken
JD Josh
Personalized Portable Listening
ALOaudio.com #mysetup share yours
51
Even Head-Fiers occasionally hang up their headphones and want to listen to loudspeakers from
time to time. CNET Audiophiliac blogger Steve Guttenberg recently reviewed the PSB IMAGINE
MINI LOUDSPEAKERS, www.psbspeakers.com, on Head-Fi.org. You can read the complete
review by clicking here. About the PSB Imagine mini speakers, Steve said:
The PSB Imagine mini loudspeakers start at $760/pair, and require a separate amplier to power
them (they do not have built-in ampliers).
I picked up a BOWERS & WILKINS ZEPPELIN AIR ($600) iDevice dock with AirPlay (www.
bowers-wilkins.com), and to say Ive been using it a lot would be an understatement--I actually
bought a second one to use at the ofce. Being able to hop on iTunes on any of my Macs, or on
any of my several iDevices, and wirelessly stream music (losslessly) to the Zeppelin Air is killer.
It is the best-sounding iDevice dock Ive yet heard, and it can play loud, with 150 watts of total
amplication (each of the ve drivers with its own amplier).
The biggest downside of the Zeppelin Air for me is the lack of exibility that comes with a single-
chassis unit. Obviously, the speakers cant be separated to improve imaging. And make sure to
read the instructions to nd out how to adjust the Zeppelin Airs bass level, as it can be a bit
heavy at its default setting (for my tastes).
I also have the tiny BOWERS & WILKINS MM-1($499) active (self-amplied) loudspeakers on my
desk at my home ofce, and they sound beautiful. They do not, however, play very loudly, which
is ne for me, because I rarely listen at high volume levels. Also, despite being so small, they
manage to sound surprisingly fulljust dont expect deep bass. As little desktop neareld
monitors, the MM-1 system is wonderful, with nice, neutral mids, and a surprisingly rened treble.
At my ofce can be found the AUDIOENGINE P4 loudspeakers (starting at $249 a /pair),
audioengineusa.com, and AUDIOENGINES N22 amplier ($199). This system is not as rened
sounding as the Bowers & Wilkins MM-1, but it still sounds very good for the price, and it plays
much louder, and has deeper, more impactful bass. The N22 has the added benet of a built-in
headphone output, so, in addition to being very affordable, its also very Head-Fi-friendly! For the
price, this Audioengine P4/N22 system is easy to recommend.
...no in-ear or full-size headphone images as naturally as the Imagine mini. The
mini resolves dynamic shading better than headphones, and you feel more viscerally
connected to music over speakers.
YES...
LOUDSPEAKERS!
52
LAVRY ENGINEERING LAVRYBLACK DA11
DAC/headphone amp ($1,480)
www.lavryengineering.com
Lavry Engineering sent me a LavryBlack DA11 a few years ago to demo, and I was so impressed I ended up buying
it. When I nally tired of carrying it to my ofce and back, I bought a second one.
Lavry gear is used in some of the most prestigious recording and mastering studios in the world, and using
the DA11 reects that, in terms of its no-frills aesthetics, utilitarian operation and, most importantly, in its
transparency and sonic performance.
The DA11 also has a very unique feature called PIC (Playback Image Control), which allows left-right manipulation
of each stereo channel in the digital domain, with minimal to no effect on tonal balance. For headphone users,
this means PIC can be used as digital crossfeed, and I use it frequently, especially when listening to stereo
recordings with heavily exaggerated left-right panning.
The DA11s inputs include XLR, USB, RCA (coaxial) and optical (Toslink) digital inputs, and accepts input sample
rates between 30kHz and 200kHz (though the USB input is limited to 96kHz). Analog output is fully balanced,
but the DA11 comes with nice Neutrik adapters for those who need single-ended outputs. It also has a discrete
headphone output, which is actually quite good.
Since its release, the Lavry DA11 has been my primary DAC, for the performance and features mentioned above.
ANTELOPE AUDIO ZODIAC LINE
DAC/headphone amps ($1,700 to $3,995)
www.antelopeaudio.com
Antelope Audio is well-known in the pro audio world for its Isochrone 10M master clock, which has a Rubidium
coreyes, it has a built-in atomic clock.
For Head-Fiers, Antelopes Zodiac DACs are getting a lot of attention. No, the Zodiacs dont have atomic clocks
built in, but the Zodiacs do have oven-controlled clocks for thermal regulation and greater clock precision. The
base Zodiac model has a 24/192 D/A converter, with USB support up to 96kHz. The Zodiac+ and Zodiac Gold
models add a greater variety of inputs and outputs, with the Zodiac+ supporting USB up to 192kHz, and the
Zodiac Gold supporting USB up to 384kHz. All three Zodiacs have dual headphone outputs on the front panel, and
separate volume controls, one for the headphone outputs, and the other for the other analog outputs.
I used a relatively early prototype of the Zodiac+, and it was an impressive piece. Ill make sure to get some ear
time with one of the production Zodiacs when I can.
NUFORCE ICON HDP
DAC/headphone amp ($449)
www.nuforce.com
NuForce is known by most in the Head-Fi community as a maker of
affordable headphone audio and desktop audio gear. What many Head-
Fiers dont know, however, is that NuForce actually rst established
itself (and still continues) as a high-end audio component manufacturer,
with pricey high-end DACs, amps, and even loudspeakers, their agship
gear lauded by the audio press with virtual unanimity.
Of the many affordable products theyve become even more widely
known for, one that has impressed me thoroughly is the NuForce Icon
HDP ($449), a desktop DAC/headphone amp/preamp combo that comes
in a fun, compact form factor, yet packs both DAC, amp, and preamp
performance worthy of consideration even by those whore more inclined
to opt for separates.
The Icon HDP includes an analog input, in addition to the digital ones.
Its digital inputs include optical, coax and USB, with optical and coax
supported up to 24/192, and USB up to 24/96 (though it should be noted
that 88.2kHz isnt supported via the Icon HDPs USB input). The Icon
HDPs DAC section employs the same DAC as NuForces $1,450 CDP-8
player, the Icon HDP DACs big sound at odds with its petite chassis. And
thats the best description of the Icon HDPs sound, whether used as a
DAC or as a DAC/amp: Big, full, detailed. I cant see dry or sterile
ever being used to describe it.
If youre considering the Icon HDP as your all-in-one headphone system,
Ive been most impressed with it driving high-impedance headphones
like the Sennheiser HD 650, HD 800, and the beyerdynamic Tesla T 1. Ive
also found it to have surprisingly good versatility even with my lower-
impedance headphones like the Denon AH-D7000 and Fostex TH-900. If
youre looking to drive sensitive in-ear monitors, though, the Icon HDP
isnt ideal for them (nor was it designed to be).
As I mentioned earlier, I love the NuForce Icon HDPs form factor, with its
small chassis able to sit in a more traditional horizontal orientation, or
(as I strongly prefer it) in a vertical stance while sturdily propped up with
the very cool (and included) silicone stand.
NUFORCE DAC-100
DAC/headphone amp ($1,095)
www.nuforce.com
If you want to move further upmarket, NuForce recently released the
NuForce DAC-100 ($1,095), and this ones a doozy for the price. As a DAC,
its equipped with four digital inputs, including two RCA, one optical, and
USB (using asynchronous transfer), all inputs supporting up to 24/192
(including support for 88.2 and 176.4). (Illuminated indicators on the front
panel indicate the current sample rate.)
Having mated it to several different amps (driving several different
headphones), Ive found the NuForce DAC-100, as a DAC, an extremely
strong performer. I dont know if its to do with the excessive attention given
to minimizing jitter, their straight-wire-with-gain goal for the preamp output
stage, or any number of other things NuForce considered in designing the
DAC-100 (likely all of the above), but it is one of my favorites of all the sub-
$1500 DACs Ive had in my systems--on sound alone, perhaps my favorite.
Compared to my long-time reference Lavry DA11, the DAC-100 sounds to
me to be as detailed, as resolving, but with a touch more lushness, a little
more air. And like the Lavry, the DAC-100 has adjustable output in very
ne digitally-controlled steps (the DAC-100 uses a 32-bit digital volume
control), which is tremendously helpful for me, with as many different amps
as I use (and their many different gain settings).
For driving headphones directly, its important to realize the DAC-100s
rather specialist nature as a headphone amp, its single-ended Class
A headphone output designed specically to drive high-impedance
headphones (the rated range being 120 to 600 ohms). If IEMs or other high-
efciency headphones are what you need to drive, and youre looking for
an all-in-one, look elsewhere. For example, the Fostex TH-900 touches the
DAC-100 headphone amps noise oor.
As for my other reference full-size over-ears: Even though the HiFiMAN HE-
6s impedance is only 50 ohms, its less sensitive nature avoids the amps
noise oor, and its driven quite well by the DAC-100; the 50-ohm Audeze
LCD-3 is also a good pairing. To my ears, though, the DAC-100 may be the
best sounding DAC/amp Ive used for driving the nicky Sennheiser HD 800,
the fullness of the sound from that combo reminding me of the HD 800
driven by some good tube amp pairings Ive heard it with. Given that the HD
800 is one of my most-used headphones, this is a big plus for me.
The DAC-100s performance as a DAC to pair with other headphone amps
is enough for me to build one of my reference rigs around it. That it can
also directly drive three of my four current reference full-size over-ear
headphones as an all-in-one desktop setup is a very welcome bonus. The
DAC-100 is a clear example of the higher end of NuForce, and I really dig it.
NOTE: If you want a little more versatility from the headphone amp section
to match up with a wider variety of headphones, later this summer NuForce
will be announcing the NuForce UDA-100 DAC/amp combo, which will
essentially be a USB-only version of the DAC-100, and with a headphone
amp designed to be more all-purpose in nature. The NuForce UDA-100 is
expected to be priced less than $800, and will look very much like the DAC-
100 you see pictured here.
53
54
SCHIIT AUDIO BIFROST
DAC ($349, or $449 with USB input)
www.schiit.com
Another nice DAC to consider is the Schiit Audio Bifrost, which, according to Schiit, is a fully upgradable
DAC, featuring 32-bit D/A conversion, a fully discrete analog section, and a sophisticated bit-perfect clock
management system, together with one of the most advanced asynchronous USB 2.0 input sections available, as
well as SPDIF coaxial and optical inputs, all with 24/192 capability. With USB input, the Bifrost is $449, without
USB its $349.
I heard the Bifrost at 2011 CanJam at Rocky Mountain Audio Fest, and was impressed enough to buy one. While
it isnt as full-featured as the Lavry or Antelope DACs, the Bifrost has excellent resolution and performance, is
American-made, and aunts a chic, elegant chassis that looks like something Dieter Rams might have designed.
True to the Schiit Audio ethos, the Bifrost is a sonic contender well above its price.
KINGREX UD384
USB DAC and USB-to-S/PDIF interface (around $500)
www.kingrex.com
If being able to play recordings up to 32-bit/384kHz interests youbut the $3995 Zodiac Gold is outside of your
budgetthen I know of no more economical way to do this than with the KingRex UD384 USB interface / USB
DAC, priced at just $500. For 32/384 support at that price, the UD384 is (not surprisingly) a no-frills design,
consisting of a very small, very simple (yet nicely nished) aluminum chassis, with no controls on it whatsoever-
-just three RCA jacks (one is an S/PDIF digital output, and the other two are the left and right analog outputs), a
power supply input, and a USB input. Thats all.
I currently do not have any 384kHz les, so Ive so far only used the UD384 up to 24/192, and it has performed
very impressivelysonically comparable, in my opinion, to any of the other DACs Ive mentioned.
KingRex has made more of a name for itself in Asia so far, but, with a recent push to expand distribution, I expect
theyll be making waves internationally soon--especially with bargain-priced products like the UD384. (Moon
Audio recently picked up U.S. distribution rights.)
CENTRANCES DACPORT
www.centrance.com
The DACport is an ultra-portable Class-A headphone amp and USB DAC, powered entirely by USB bus power.
About the size of a partially smoked Double Toro cigar, the diminutive DACport yielded one of the lowest (if not the
lowest) jitter measurement ever published in a Stereophile review (that I can recall anyway, and Ive been reading
Stereophile for a long time)amazing. Ive heard the DACport on many occasions, and its fantastic, and is
certainly unique in its form factor.
...the DACport seems to be solid and well made 24/96 USB portable computer DAC, with excellent sound that
matches or beats other $450-500 DAC/amps...
Head-Fi member/reviewer HeadphoneAddict
55
WOO AUDIO WTP-1 AND WOO AUDIO WDS-1
CD transport and DAC, respectively ($1,199 each)
www.wooaudio.com
When spinning CDs, it has increasingly been for the purpose of ripping them to my media drives. Still, though, my entire
CD collection has yet to be ripped, so Im still playing CDs on a regular basis. Few CD players have given me the pleasure
of playing music that the Woo Audio WTP-1 (transport) / Woo Audio WDS-1 (DAC) combo provide. In some part, its due to
the kid in me who used to enjoy the very involved, very deliberate routines associated with spinning vinyl to hear his music-
-the WTP-1s CD swing-out CD cover arm and magnetic disc clamp hark back to the physical act of playing vinyl. Mostly,
though, its because this combo sounds wonderful.
Given my increasing transition to computer audio, though, its the WDS-1 DAC that interests me the most in this combo
(and the two can be purchased separately). With optical, coaxial, XLR, and USB digital inputs, the WDS-1 has me
completely covered, as far as my digital input needs go. These inputs, combined with its single-ended and balanced
outputs--with digitally adjustable output level, and the fact that it supports up to 24/192 from all of its inputshas one
of my two DA11s a bit nervous about its role as a rst-stringer.
Both the WTP-1 and WDS-1 share the wonderful new layered-metal aesthetic established by the extreme agship Woo
Audio WA234 MONO dual-monoblock headphone amplier. The WTP-1 and WDS-1 are priced at $1199 each; and if you do
buy both, youll need to spend another $25 for footstands and an umbilical cord that allow you to mate them properly.
56
ASUS XONAR ESSENCE ONE
DAC/headphone amp (around $600)
www.asus.com
ASUS is a well-recognized global brand, and manufacturer of computers of every type and form factor, graphic
cards, sound cards, motherboards, networking hardware, mobile phones, Blu-ray players, and goodness knows
what else. And heres what I love about ASUS: Huge though it is, it still has the capacity to think and move like a
much smaller companyand it can still do niche stuff that no other company of its scale would consider.
Case in point is the ASUS Xonar Essence One DAC/headphone amp. Yes, its a DAC/headphone amp, and weve
obviously seen a bunch of those. But this one has features on it that make me wonder if ASUS has a team of
Head-Fiers working in their product development team. The Xonar Essence One supports up to 24/192 from
all of its inputs. Like the Antelope Zodiac DACs, the Xonar Essence One has independent volume controls, one
dedicated to its headphone output, and the other controls the RCA and XLR output levels. And check this out: It
was deliberately designed to be user-customizable via opamp rolling. Yes, this multinational, globally recognized
company actually designed an opamp-rollable DAC/amp, and even offers a separate user manual for it called the
Opamp Swap Guidecan you believe it? It also has a lot of other nice features, and seems very well regarded
in our community.
The ASUS Xonar Essence One is one of the next DACs Ill be living with in my rigs.
FOSTEX HP-A8C
DAC/headphone amp (around $2,000)
www.fostexinternational.com
Fostex took the high-end portable audio world by storm last year with their HP-P1 portable iDevice DAC/amp
combo. Now theyre coming after your home and ofce rigs, too, with a new high-end desktop DAC/amp combo
called the Fostex HP-A8C. Whereas the HP-P1 sports a rather utilitarian appearance, Fostexlike they did with
their new agship TH-900 headphonehas gone for straight-up gorgeous aesthetics with the HP-A8C. This is
their agship audiophile component, and it looks the part. With its black front panel covered with glass, and its
edge-trimmed buttons and knobs, the HP-A8Cs look reminds me of a modernized take on the classic McIntosh
Labs style.
The HP-A8Cs digital inputs include USB, AES/EBU, coaxial, and optical (x2), as well as a set of analog (RCA)
inputs. With its AKM AK4399 32-bit DAC chip, the HP-A8C can decode up to 32/192 from all inputs, and DSD
via USB or an SD card (DSD via USB is currently only via beta rmware). Theres also user-selectable 2X or 4X
upsampling, and user-selectable sharp-roll-of or minimum-delay digital lter settings.
Its built-in headphone amp is an all-discrete design, with 0.5dB-step adjustable gain to make it easy to pair
the HP-A8C with headphones of just about any sensitivity. The HP-A8Cs headphone amp circuit is designed to
drive headphone impedances ranging from 16 ohms to 600 ohms. The HP-A8C comes with a nice wireless remote
control, which comes in handy for easily accessing the HP-A8Cs many options and features.
Simply put, the Fostex HP-A8C is designed to be as uncompromising and exible as having two very full-featured
separate components (DAC and headphone amp), but in one very reasonably sized, and thoroughly gorgeous,
single chassis.
I only had a chance to spend a little time with the HP-A8C so far (mostly paired with Fostexs new agship TH-900
headphone), and, right away, I was absolutely over the moon with it. A production HP-A8C will be arriving here
soon, and I cant wait to have more of an opportunity to try a bunch of different headphones with it, including
more time paired with the new Fostex agship headphone. I also want to try using the HP-A8C as a DAC only, to
pair with different headphone amps I already have.
58
AUDIOQUEST DRAGONFLY
www.audioquest.com
Is it possible that something the size of a USB thumb drive can be mentioned in the company of the other DACs in this
section? If its the AudioQuest Dragony, then, yes, absolutely. That something so small checks off as many audiophile
buzzwords as it does is pretty amazing. ESS Sabre DAC? Check. Supports up to 24/96? Check. Asynchronous USB
transfer? By Gordon Rankin, no lessso check. 64-step analog stepped volume control? Check. And its quiet enough
(in terms of noise oor) to drive most of my in-ear monitors silently, yet also has the oomph to drive many of my over-
ears, too.
One thing thats not audiophile about the Dragony is its price. $249. This ones going to shake the audio world up a
bit. Of course, because its so small, expect some limitations. The amp in it cant drive, say, a HiFiMAN HE-6 well. Its
only input is USB. Its only output is via a mini jack (3.5mm). And though I think it keeps good company with the DACs
in this section, it doesnt, to my ears, have the ultimate resolution that DACs like the DA11, HP-A8C or DAC-100 have.
One key thing to keep in mind is that the Dragonys form factor opens up use cases that no other DAC/amps do. For
one, its pocketable, so its easy to take with you everywhere. Also, because it plugs right in like a USB thumb drive, no
USB cable is needed to use it. Its USB bus-powered, so no power adapter is needed. Think of what this means when
youre staring at that tiny tray table in coach class seating. It means you can use the Dragony even there. And I do.
Im all over the AudioQuest Dragony, and highly recommend it.
SONIC STUDIO AMARRA
Professional-quality music player software for Mac OS ($49.99 to $189)
www.sonicstudio.com
Im a Mac user, I regularly buy high-res music tracks and albums (higher resolution than standard CDs
16-bit/44.1kHz resolution), and I have a few DACs capable of resolutions up to 24-bit/192kHz, and one that goes
to 32-bit/384kHz. I use iTunes. Some of the music I buy is in FLAC format. iTunes does not play FLAC natively, so I
typically convert my FLAC les to AIFF format. Typically, to take full advantage of high-res music, I would have to go to
Audio MIDI Setup in Mac OS to manually set the appropriate sample rate. Occasionally, I want a parametric equalizer
to help custom-tailor my sound. In other words, Im a perfect candidate for Sonic Studios Amarra.
What does Amarra do? The most visible thing it does is automatically streams the playing tracks native sample rate
to your DAC. This prevents the necessity of having to do this manually in Audio MIDI Setup (which can be a pain by
seriously disrupting the continuity of a music listening session). In short, Amarra assures bit-perfect streaming to
your DAC.
When using Amarra, the audio actually goes through the Sonic Studio Engine, and, in my opinion (and the opinion of
most I know who use it), it sounds better than Mac OSs native audio engine. You can easily switch between Amarra
and iTunes at the press of a (virtual) button to hear the difference for yourself. The latest version (version 2.4.1 as of
this writing) is a considerable renement of past versions Ive used, further improving resolution and imaging. The
latest version also eliminated the skipping issues I had with previous versions--it now feels like a polished product,
not a beta.
Add to all of the above Amarras outstanding Sonic Mastering EQ that I use to custom-tailor sound to my preferences,
and its no wonder why it has become an indispensable component of all of my Mac-based computer audio setups.
So, my fellow high-res-music-buying high-res-DAC-owning Mac users, in my rm opinion, Amarra is an absolute must
for us.
PORTABLE iDEVICE DACs
Last year saw the emergence and renement of iDevice DAC products.
These devices allow you to take the music digitally and uncompressed
from your iPod, iPhone or iPadthus, bypassing the iDevices internal
DAC circuitryto allow the use of a higher-end DAC. In short, this
renders the iDevice merely a transport, leaving the heavy lifting to more
capable DACs.
CYPHER LABS ALGORHYTHM SOLO ($579), cypherlabs.com, is
very popular in the Head-Fi community for its relatively compact design,
and built-in lithium-ion battery, which allows it to be used in portable
rigs, in conjunction with your favorite portable headphone amp. For
that use, it has its own built-in DAC, based on a high-end Wolfson DAC
chip. The AlgoRhythm Solo can also be used as a digital pass-through,
with a coaxial digital output that allows you to pass the digital stream
from your iDevice directly to another DAC, if, for example, you have a
high-end desktop DAC youd rather use when youre not on-the-go. (We
discussed the Cypher Labs AlgoRhythmSolo in Episode 003 of Head-Fi TV.)
If you have the desire to listen to better sounding music out of your
iDevice. This is the way to go.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Michael Lockwood (monotune)
The FOSTEX HP-P1 (around $650), fostexinternational.com, was
released later in the year, and has been a constantly sold-out hit.
What makes the HP-P1 so popular is the fact that it does what the
AlgoRhythm Solo does (although its digital output is optical, and it
uses a 32-bit AKM DAC chip instead of a Wolfson), and it has a built-in
headphone amp. With three gain settings, the amp is quite versatile,
and can very nicely drive most headphones that youd want to use
portably. The single-unit portable iDevice DAC/amp combination has
made the HP-P1 a constant companion of mine. (We discussed the
Fostex HP-P1 in Episode 011 of Head-Fi TV.)
I reckon the HP-P1 is a great piece of kit, if not an amazing one. I
reckon it hits its price almost exactly in terms of features, capability
and sound quality.
Head-Fi administrator/member/reviewer Amos Barnett (Currawong)
PORTABLE iDEVICE DACs &
iDEVICE ALTERNATIVES
If youre an iPhone 4 or iPhone 4S user, and the idea of lashing two
or three devices together to make a high-end portable rig strikes you
as inelegant, then the new V-MODA VAMP ($650) is your answer.
Custom-crafted to t the iPhone 4 or 4S perfectly, a VAMP rig is about as
elegant as a high-end portable headphone rig currently gets.
Like the AlgoRhythm Solo and HP-P1, the VAMP streams digital from your
iPhone to its own DAC stage. From there, the VAMPs built-in headphone
amp is able to drive both sensitive in-ears and more demanding over-
ears, with two different gain settings and a low noise oor.
The VAMP also offers a mode called VQ, which alters the tonal balance
to tighten bass and increase treble, as well as altering the imaging to
give increased depth and width. (Personally, I never use VQ, and instead
choose the VAMPs pure output--but you might like it with some of your
headphones.)
If you have a higher-end desktop DAC youd like to digitally feed with your
iPhones music, the VAMP (like the HP-P1) has a digital optical output.
To all of this, the VAMPs powerful 2200mAh lithium-ion battery offers
the option to charge your iPhone, even while listening to the VAMP. If
youre a frequent traveler, this feature alone can be a huge blessing.
So for audiophiles using iPhone 4/4S, the V-MODA VAMP is a DAC (with
digital pass-through), amp, and phone charger, housed in a single unit--
no rubber bands or Velcro needed. Graceful, chic, compact, elegant, and
highly recommended.
59
HIGH-END PORTABLE MEDIA PLAYERS/ DACs
(iDEVICE ALTERNATIVES)
If youre considering a non-iDevice option, and/or youre looking for
another high-end portable audio option, consider two rather unique
devices that have found a place with many Head-Fiers, the COLORFLY
C4 POCKET HIFI (around $800), www.colory.net, and the HIFIMAN
HM-801 (around $790), www.head-direct.com. Both of these devices
have DAC sections built around DAC chips normally only seen on higher
end full-size digital components, the C4 using the Cirrus Logic CS4398
and CS8422, and the HM-801 using the PCM-1704.
The Colory C4 is, to my eyes, one of the coolest looking audio devices
Ive seen in a while, portable or otherwise. With what appears to be an
aged-look bronze faceplate, an ALPS pro audio sliding volume control,
and engraved black walnut wood sides and back, the C4 is straight-up
steampunk. It is gorgeous.
With 32GB of built-in storage (also with a micro-SD expansion slot), the
C4 can act as a standalone media player. The user interface is far from
Apple iOS elegant, but its usable. In portable media-player mode the C4
supports MP3 (32 kbps to 320 kbps), WMA (up to 24/192), APE (normal
compression), and FLAC.
It can also be used as a DAC, or as a transport, as its equipped with
digital input and output, both via coaxial RCA. But, as a DAC, you
are limited to the C4s built-in headphone output, as it does not have
dedicated analog line-outs. The C4 should provide about seven hours of
battery life.
As a portable media player, the HiFiMAN HM-801 only comes with 2GB of
internal storage, but does have an SDHC slot for easy expansion. And if
the Colorys user interface isnt iOS elegant, the HiFiMANs is a bit further
still. Whereas Apples iOS user interface is a pleasure to use, neither of
these players evokes a feeling of warm welcome as standalone players.
Ive owned the HM-801 since it was an early prototype, and I still hit the
wrong buttons frequently when Im using it as a portable player.
As a portable player, the HiFiMAN supports APE (fast, normal, high),
AAC (16-320Kbps), FLAC lossless VBR (16-bit and 24-bit), WMA (8-
355Kbps), OGG (0 to 10), WAV PCM (MS-ADPCM, IMA-ADPCM), MP3 (VBR,
8-320Kbps), so theres more exibility for native format support with it
than the C4.
Both the C4 and HM-801 have DAC component functionality, and, given
my difculties with their user interfaces as portable players, its their
DAC functions that most interest me. One use Ive had for my HM-801
(and which I intend to similarly apply to the C4) is as a DAC for old disc
spinners that might reasonably be called obsolete. (Again, both the HM-
801 and C4 have coaxial digital inputs, the HM-801 via mini jack, and the
C4 via RCA.)
The HM-801 has the added versatility of being able to be used as a USB DAC,
which makes it a fantastic all-in-one amp/USB DAC coffee house rig.
As for their sound signatures, the HM-801 is a lusher sounding piece than the
C4s more neutral presentation. (The C4 has equalizer settings, but Ive not
yet used them.) Both sound amazing, though, for what they are; and if youre
patient with their user interface idiosyncrasiesand willing to pay the price
for themyoure in for a treat.
So how would I sum up the sound of HM801? Effortless is the word that
pops into my mind not just effortless as a DAP, but like a good desktop
source in miniature. In many occasions, I was totally immersed into the
sound of HM801 that I cant quite get from any other DAP. It is not a sound
that I would describe as either analog or digital, but rather a good balance
between...
Head-Fi member/reviewer Tai Ming Sow (ClieOS)
NEWER, EASIER-TO-USE HIGH-END PORTABLE
MEDIA PLAYERS/ DACs COMING
This year saw advances in high-end portable media players--and, thankfully,
with monumental improvements to user interface (UI) design. iBasso released
its new IBASSO DX100 ($829), www.ibasso.com, which uses the Android
OS and what looks to me like a very usable UI. The DX100 is built around the
ESS ES9018 SABRE 32-bit DAC Chip. The handful of members on Head-Fi
whove used the DX100 seem to be very enthusiastic about it. I had a chance
to hear it briey at a recent New York Head-Fi Meet, and was impressed. Im
looking forward to trying the iBasso DX100 down the road.
I expect to see even more easier-to-use high-end digital players coming down
the pike from other manufacturers, too, so stay tuned for those.
61
"putting the VAMP on the iPhone
is like watching it change into its
superhero audio costume. There's
nothing quite like it"
- Popular Science
headphone amp . battery pack
reveal reviews at V-MODA.com/VAMP
FOSTEX HP-P1
Most of my favorite headphones
can benet tremendously from
dedicated headphone ampliers.
And the ones Ive listed belowif
youre not familiar with this class
of headphoneswill likely spoil you
forever. These headphones have
a way of challenging you to bring
the best out of them, and that can
get very expensive, very quickly.
Its headphones like these that
make Head-Fis unofcial slogan
Welcome to Head-Fi. Sorry about
your wallet.
Youve been warned.
SENNHEISER HD 800
Open, full-size, around-the-ear headphone, ring-radiator driver (around $1500)
www.sennheiser.com
The Sennheiser HD 800 is one of the most signicant headphones of the last decade. It elevated
the state of the art in dynamic headphones, by a wide margin, when it was rst announced at the
beginning of 2009; and it encouraged others in the industry to also push the envelope.
Handcrafted in Germany, the HD 800 was the rst (and still is the only) headphone to use low-
mass, low-distortion ring-radiator drivers. These ultra-fast drivers, coupled with the HD 800s
extremely non-reverberant chassis, result in a ruthlessly revealing headphone.
To wring the best sound out of it, the HD 800 absolutely needs to be matched well with a good
headphone amplier (with this headphone, Ive personally had my best results with tube amps).
Match it up poorly, and it can be overly bright. Drive it well, and itll reward you with what will
probably be the best sound quality youve ever heard from headphones. Yes, the HD 800 is picky,
but, in my opinion, its worth the effort once you get it right.
The HD 800 is also thought by many (myself included) to be among the most comfortable full-
sized headphones ever made. The HD 800s headband radius and exibility (its headband being
as close to perfect as Ive worn), softly-sprung pivots, large-footprint earpads, and luxurious pad
materials make the HD 800 feel feather-light on the head.
In addition to its technical merits, the Sennheiser HD 800 also had epochal industry impact in
another way: It began a strong upward shift in agship dynamic headphone pricing, arriving with
a rmly-enforced minimum price that was around three times the price of Sennheisers previous
dynamic agship (the HD 650). Because this price increase was met with what most considered
a commensurate performance elevation, demand for the HD 800 was extremely strong at its
launch, and remains so. In my opinion, this encouraged other companies to similarly go all-out,
developing high-performance headphones with greater attention to pushing the performance
envelope, in the wake of a market that revealed itself more than willing to pay a high premium for
ultra-high-performance headphones.
For all of the above things, the HD 800 is a fantastic, important headphone, and one of my all-
time favorites.
There is also no doubt in my mind that the HD800 are the imaging champs of the dynamic
headphone world. I have owned or heard almost every signicant dynamic headphone there
is Sony R10, At W5000 and L3000, Senn HD650/600, Grado RS1 and GS1000, all the ones I
currently own, and many, many more I have owned and sold. And I have never heard a headphone
image like the HD800. Depth is phenomenal, and somehow width is even better. I really feel like
the sound is IN FRONT of me, not stuck inside my head like with so many headphones. The
soundstaging is better with the HD800 than with the DX1000, and that is saying something I
think the DX1000 image sensationally. But the HD800 is terric in this regard.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Skylab
64
BEYERDYNAMIC T 1
Semi-open, full-size, around-the-ear headphone (around $1,300)
Not long after Sennheiser announced the HD 800, beyerdynamic started ring gargantuan salvos of high-end goodness
of its own, beginning with the Tesla T 1. The beyerdynamic T 1 approaches neutrality with a slightly more forgiving nature
than Sennheisers HD 800. I also nd it easier to nd a good amp match-up for the T 1 than the HD 800.
If the Sennheiser HD 800 is on the cooler side of your tonal preferencesbut you enjoy its detail and transparencygive
serious consideration to the T 1. Like few other headphones, beyerdynamics agship somehow balances ultra-revealing
with sense of ease. Though its deserving of outstanding amplication, Ive not found it a hard headphone to coax
greatness out of.
Ive always enjoyed some of beyerdynamics headphones, but the Tesla T 1 (as well as the portable Tesla DT 1350) made
me a beyerdynamic enthusiast.
While maybe just a touch lush, [the beyerdynamic T 1] is possessed of an amazing transparency and neutrality.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Skylab
BEYERDYNAMIC T 5 P
Closed, full-size, around-the-ear headphone (around $1,300)
I occasionally get asked a question that goes something like this: If you could pick only one headphone to take with you
to a deserted island, which one would you choose? Lets break down my current answer. Itd have to be closed, and with
good isolation, as Id prefer maintaining the option of having the sounds of island nature separated from my music. Itd
have to be an over-ear headphone, and, specically an around-the-ear type for maximum comfort. Itd have to be durably
built. It would have to be relatively easy to drive, as Im assuming this hypothetical deserted island might not necessarily
come with a dream rig to go with the headphone. And, in the event that I was also able to take a good rig with me--or at
least have the hope that someone might send me a good rig in a care package some day--itd have to be a model with
higher-end sound quality. In other words, my current deserted island headphone choice would be the beyerdynamic T 5 p.
In the Head-Fi community, the T 5 p can be a bit polarizing; but those who love it tend to love it. Well, Im one of the ones
who loves it. Looking at the rather vast collection of headphones around me, I see no other full-size, closed, around-the-
ear headphone that isolates well, and that can be driven by an iPhone, and yet scale to higher levels of performance in
higher-end rigs. If you nd yourself always choosing headphones with a warmer tonal balance, the T 5 p might not be
your cup of tea. Is it bright? It can be; but, for me, its never harsh (unless the recording is).
Every other headphone in this Summit-Fi section can reach higher heights than the T 5 p. But none of them can be all of
the things that the T 5 p can.
Now for the next question: Ginger or Mary Ann?
They are extremely detailed and transparent. They provide great sound stage with good positioning - especially for a
closed headphone.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Szadzik
This is still my favorite headphone, when something else impresses me beyond this, then Ill upgrade.
Head-Fi member/reviewer kiteki
66
AUDEZE LCD-2
Open, around-the-ear, planar magnetic headphone ($945)
www.audeze.com
Why is the Audeze LCD-2 the most discussed $500+ headphone in Head-Fi.orgs history? Simply because it puts an X
in so many of the dream headphone checkboxes. Extremely good detail retrieval across the frequency spectrum? Check.
Outstanding, visceral bass? Check. Easy to listen to, and non-fatiguing? Check, and check. Scales well, from portable
systems to world-class desktop rigs? Check. Relatively easy to drive? More so than any other non-Audeze planar
magnetic headphone, so check that box, too. You get the point.
The Audeze LCD-2 has become my quickest go-to recommendation when asked about high-end headphones. Why?
Because its not a bear to nd a good rig match for, it can perform well in a great variety of rigs. Also, Ive found most
people prefer strong, impactful bass, and the Audeze shines there, without giving up anything in the way of low frequency
detail. The LCD-2 is extremely easy to recommend, because just about every Head-Fier can nd a place for itwhich is
why its the most discussed $500+ headphone in Head-Fidom.
These are all around the best headphones Ive ever heard. Nothing sounds bad on them, and everything feels natural,
transparent and liquid.
Head-Fi member Dustin Chevalier (dagothur)
www.audeze.com
Erick Labson | Grammy Award-Winning Senior Mastering Engineer at Universal Mastering Studios
NO HEADPHONE AT ANY
PRICE COMES CLOSE.
Audeze_HeadFi_Ad_Half_05.indd 1 6/27/12 9:44 PM
67
AUDEZE LCD-3
Open, around-the-ear, planar magnetic headphone ($1,945)
www.audeze.com
Take everything about the Audeze LCD-2 (sonically), improve on all of it, and what do you get? You get one of the very best
headphones Ive ever heard, the Audeze LCD-3.
It looks a lot like the LCD-2, yes. But its equipped with an entirely new driver that sports a new magnet structure and
a much lighter diaphragm. There are other differences, too (like softer, more supple pads, a new earpiece cable entry
design, and fancier wood), but it isnt until you listen to the LCD-3 that you grasp that this is not the same headphone (as
the LCD-2).
The LCD-3 has all the impact and boldness of the LCD-2, but with a noticeable bump up in delicacy and nesse. While
this improvement spans the audioband, its most noticeable in the lower registers, where its combination of bass impact
and bass detail is, to me, unrivaled by any other headphone.
Outside of the the Stax SR-009 or Sennheiser HE 90 (Orpheus), the Audeze LCD-3 is simply one of the best headphones
Ive ever heard. So, even at nearly $2,000, that makes the LCD-3 a solid value, in my opinion.
Midrange performance was also absolutely rst rate. There is a slight lushness to the mids, I feel - Im not sure
how else to describe it I think the LCD-3, as a whole, is the best headphone I have heard. I have never owned any
electrostats, but I have had several pairs for review, and have heard quite a few others, and I prefer the meatier sound of
the LCD-3 to any of those.
TAKET H2+
Open, suspended-in-front-of-the-ear, Heil-type polymer piezoelectric driver headphone, with built-in ribbon supertweeters
(around $1,900 for the H2+, plus around $1,200 for its companion TAKET TR2 transformer box)
http://www.taket.jp
You know how your ears can discern a note struck on a piano live (in real life) versus one coming from a loudspeaker?
A live drum strike? A live string pluck? No other headphone Ive used conveys music with that live-type physicality that
the TAKET H2+ does throughout the entire audible spectrum. Its an effect that can be a bit unnerving at rst, but then
you come to realize that level of tactility makes for very real, very live-sounding musical reproduction (particularly with
acoustic music).
Know, though, that the H2+ can also be a lot of work, denitely a more involved thing than typical headphones. To start,
the H2+ requires loudspeaker outputs that are used to feed the TAKET TR2 transformer box that in turn feeds the H2+
the voltage it needs. Even after getting it hooked up, the H2+/TR2 isnt a plug-and-play affair, as to meet my sonic
preferences requires equalization of the H2+ (which I do with a parametric equalizer in Sonic Studios Amarra software).
Most consistently, what I end up tweaking is the upper-mid-bass and upper bass range, where Ill often hear rather
pronounced peakiness from the H2+. Once Ive got it dialed in, though, the H2+ becomes, for me, one of the worlds best
headphones, and one that sounds like no other.
As I said in a Head-Fi TV episode about the H2+, I denitely do not recommend this headphone for everyone. This
headphone is for the diehard, veteran, grizzled Head-Fier, willing to put the effort in, and already possessing many other
headphones. For folks who t that description, the H2+ will almost certainly be an absolute thrill.
68 69
STAX SR-009
Open, around-the-ear, electrostatic headphone (around $5200)
www.stax.co.jp
Sennheisers now-discontinued, limited edition electrostatic HE-90 Orpheus had been my personal choice for
best sounding headphone for so long that I assumed it would remain in that spot permanently. However, Staxs
new agship now wears my personal best-ever crown. In Episode 008 of Head-Fi TV, I called the Stax SR-009
my choice for best sounding headphone Ive yet heard, and nothing has changed my mind about that since.
The Stax SR-009 is the most revealing, most captivating, most neutral, most outstanding transducer of any type
Ive yet heard. With this headphone, you really will hear things, textures, air, details you hadnt previously heard
in many of your favorite recordings. The SR-009 is simply sublime. A masterpiece.
Heres the rub, though: If you want to extract the very best from this headphone, plan on spending
approximately $5,000 to $6,000 more for a top-ight electrostatic headphone amplier, like the HeadAmp Blue
Hawaii SE, Woo Audio WES or Ray Samuels Audio A-10.
Could it really be worth all that? This is Head-Fi. So, yes, for some people, its absolutely worth all that.
(We discussed the Stax SR-009 in Episode 008 of Head-Fi TV.)
The pinnacle of headphone listening...
The resolution of those things was so
incredible I thought that they reproduced
the notes of a double-bass with such
amazing resolution you could hear the
detail of the strings vibrating and thats
before you get an idea of what their
ribbon tweeter could do! ...overall [with
the Stax SR-009], I believe we now have
our king.
Head-Fi administrator/member/reviewer Amos Barnett (Currawong)
SENNHEISER HD 700
Open, full-size, around-the-ear headphone (around $1,000)
http://www.sennheiser.com
After the introduction of its agship HD 800, Sennheiser had a one-thousand-dollar-wide chasm in its product line
between the $500 HD 650 and the $1500 HD 800. Of course, Sennheisers competitors were more than happy to slot into
that price range with some amazing new headphones, and I knew it was only a matter of time until Sennheiser would
have its own. At this years CES, Sennheiser unveiled the $1000 Sennheiser HD 700. It was a long time in coming, but I
think its another new winner from the old German mark.
Though it does not come equipped with the HD 800s extraordinary ring drivers, the HD 700 does have a patent-
pending ventilated magnet system to manage airow (and minimize turbulence) around its new driversand careful
use of sandwiched materials through the headband to damp chassis vibrationequipping the HD 700 with its own
innovations. It is also one of the three most comfortable full-size headphones Ive worn (the other two being the HD 800
and the Fostex TH-900).
Its sound is highly detailed, with a treble tilt north of neutral, reminding me more of the HD 800 than the warmer HD 650,
even if it doesnt quite reach the performance heights of its agship sibling. One key advantage Ive found with the HD
700 over the HD 800 is an easier time nding amp matchups for it, and greater ease of driving. As a result, I regularly
nd myself using the HD 700 in good portable rigsand more affordable desktop rigsa lot more than Ive ever done
with the HD 800 (which I nd to be pickier, its use almost always reserved for my higher-end setups). It probably helps
that the 150-ohm HD 700 is somewhat more sensitive than the 300-ohm HD 800. The HD 700 also images very well, but
again at least a tick behind the HD 800s standard-setting wide, open, airy soundstage.
At $1000, the HD 700 nds itself in a growing crowd of world-class headphones, including some remarkable planar
magnetic designs. However, its sonic performance, combined with its light weight and ultra-comfortable designand
relative ease of drivingwill have the HD 700 nding its own fan base quickly, including yours truly.
HIFIMAN HE-500
Open, around-the-ear, planar magnetic headphone (around $699)
www.head-direct.com
The HiFiMAN HE-500 is the everymans HiFiMAN world-class planar magnetic headphone. I actually prefer the HE-500 to
the HE-6 (or any other planar magnetic HiFiMAN has released) in all but a few setups. Far more efcient than the HE-6,
the HE-500 can pair with a great many more amps (if youve got a headphone amp, it can probably drive the HE-500 just
ne); and its performance, when driven well, reminds me of the HE-6 at its tonal best (even if the HE-500 never does
quite catch the HE-6 in terms of detail retrieval). If youve listened to the Audeze LCD-2 and found it a touch too bassy
for your preferences, then the HE-500 should be auditioned.
Now, just because the HE-500 is easier to drive than the HE-6 does not necessarily mean its easy to drive. That said,
Ive found that most good desktop headphone ampliers (and some of the stronger portable ampliers) can drive the
HE-500 well; just dont expect your iPhones built-in headphone output to massage high performance from it.
The HE500 is a well balanced and outstanding pair of headphones. It will compete and outperform many headphones
that are twice its price. I know of no other headphone in the 699.00 price range that will come close to offering the
performance of the HE500. Fang has brought to the marketplace a headphone of extraordinary quality in sound at a
ridiculous low price. For the money you get a headphone that is remarkably lifelike.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Frank I
70 71
HIFIMAN HE-6 and HIFIMAN EF-6
HE-6: Open, around-the-ear, planar magnetic headphone (around $1,299)
EF-6: Class A headphone amplier and preamplier (around $1,599)
www.head-direct.com
The last few years has seen the erce reemergence of planar magnetic driver technology. And one of the two companies currently
pushing the envelope in planar magnetic driver design is HiFiMAN.
Last year, the HiFiMAN HE-6 almost didnt make it into this guide, not because it isnt one of the best headphones in the world
(to my ears, it certainly is), but because it can be so difcult to drive well. The problem is that not just any headphone amplier
will dothe HE-6 needs power, and lots of it. Last year, I recommended its use with the Ray Samuels Audio DarkStar (around
$3,500), a pairing I still highly recommend if you have the budget for it. Even if you do have the scratch, though, make sure to
also give serious consideration to the new HiFiMAN EF-6 Class A headphone amp and preamp, which is less than half the price of
the DarkStar.
The EF-6 was built and voiced with the HE-6 in mind, and, like the DarkStar, the EF-6 drives the HE-6 so adeptly that the HE-6
loses none of the detail (especially in the treble) that makes it so special, but also gains body noticeably everywhere else. When
the HE-6 is driven well, it is an absolute force of nature, ultra-detailed yet smoothutterly world class. Ive also used the EF-6 to
drive many other headphones, including ones by Sennheiser, Audeze, beyerdynamic, Denon and Fostex, and it has done wonderfully
with all of those.
I havent yet had the chance to compare the DarkStar and EF-6 side by side, but will do so when I can. Even so, I can say with
complete condence that the HE-6/EF-6 combo is a staggeringly good combo at the combined price of around $2,900one of the
best headphone/amp combos Ive ever heard.
The treble on the HE6 is very extended
and sparkly. There is no hint of any
harshness or peaks that I can hear.
Very extended and clean with the best
presentation of any headphone I own. It
is a pleasure listening to the realistic
sound and shimmer of drum cymbals.
The space between high hats and the
glimmer of all percussion instruments is
so much fun to listen too.
Head-Fi member/reviewer Frank I
FOSTEX TH-900
Closed, around-the-ear headphone (around $2,000)
www.fostexinternational.com
Take many different types of sulfur-smoked silver foil pieces, and adhere themin a manner similar to a torn-paper
collageto a black lacquered base over a precisely shaped Japanese cherry birch wood form. Finish it with an overcoat
of rich Bordeaux-wine-colored paint, until the nish looks deep, glossy, liquid. Finally, using platinum leaf, meticulously
apply the emblem of the manufacturer of this exquisite thing. Am I describing the creation of something destined for the
display cabinets of the Imperial House of Japan? Maybe if the Emperor of Japan is a headphone audio enthusiast. No,
what Im describing is how the traditional, painstaking art of Japanese urushi lacquer is used in the adornment of an
earcup of a agship headphone.
When Fostex decided to craft a new agship high-end headphone, they wanted it to be impeccable in every way, offering
high-end sound quality (of course), and to do so with extraordinary beauty and comfort. Their new TH-900 headphone is
the result, and it is indeed a stunner. Not surprisingly, it wasnt long before the high-end connoisseurs of Head-Fi were
abuzz about it, and deservedly so.
The TH-900 is one of the easiest headphones to fall in love with. Of course, theres that love-at-rst-sight thing. From
a purely aesthetic standpoint, the TH-900 is, in my opinion, the most beautiful headphone ever created. Ive not seen a
photo yet that fully conveys the deep beauty of the TH-900s urushi-lacquered earcups (nor have I been able to capture it
with my own photos, but not for lack of trying).
Then theres the love-at-rst-wear thing. The TH-900 is extremely comfortablethere are few headphones Id be willing
to wear for longer durations than I do the TH-900. A closed headphone, the TH-900s earpads are made of an advanced
synthetic leather derived from eggshell membrane. The result is a material that has the suppleness of the softest leather.
Fostex wouldnt do all of this without rst having sonic performance worthy of it. And in this, its sound, the TH-900 is just
as accomplished as it is with its style and comfort. Very revealing, relatively neutral, never fatiguing. The TH-900 sounds
velvety and organic, without ever sounding overly smoothed. I have headphones that are more technically capable in one
aspect or another, some that are more neutral, and some that are ultimately more revealing, but few headphones can
convey as much as the TH-900 does without tiring me at all. It is an eminently easy, yet involving, headphone to listen to.
In every way, the Fostex TH-900 is simply beautiful, and a wonderfully executed agship by Fostex.
72
Im quite glad I have the TH900 on
rotation in my ever-evolving collection
of audio gear. In the month or so Ive
spent getting to know it, the bordeaux
beauty has grown on me to such an
extent that I can condently say its
one of my all-time favorite dynamic
headphones. I feel its a subtle but
exciting masterpiece, really.
Head-Fi member/reviewer MuppetFace
73
DONT FORGET THE (BINAURAL) MUSIC!
With all this talk about gear, lets not forget that ultimately were all in this for the music. And since so many of
us are building high-resolution headphone rigs, I wanted to point you to my single favorite place to buy high-
resolution recordings: HDTRACKS.COM (www.hdtracks.com).
HDtracks was co-founded by David Chesky, composer, and also the founder of Chesky Records. In addition to the
entire Chesky Records library, you can nd the Rolling Stones, Tom Petty, Fleetwood Mac, Diana Krall, U2, and
countless other artists. And every genre is represented, whether youre into classical, jazz, classic rock, alternative
rock, blues, world music, and more. Everything at HDtracks.com is available for purchase in downloadable form,
with a good deal of the music there available in 24/88, 24/96, 24/176, and 24/192 high-res.
Head-Fi has worked with HDtracks.com on two albums, one a headphone test album called Open Your Ears,
and the other an amazing binaural album called Explorations In Space And Time. In fact, there are several more
binaural albums planned, including the recently released Dr. Cheskys Sensational, Fantastic, And Simply Amazing
Binaural Sound Show!
After Explorations In Space And Time, the most common request we received was for binaural albums with a
greater variety of music. David heard you, and the rst album in response to those requests is Dr. Cheskys
Sensational, Fantastic, And Simply Amazing Binaural Sound Show! On this latest binaural album by Chesky, music
from several genres--folk, jazz, Arabic, classical (including some deeeeeep bass organ work), rock, percussion
(including a couple of tracks from Explorations), choral, funk, and New Orleans--is combined with binaural test
tracks and fun binaural demonstration tracks.

Click here to check out Dr. Cheskys Sensational, Fantastic, And Simply Amazing Binaural Sound Show!, and if you
like what you hear on the track samples, please make sure to show support for our binaural initiatives by buying
the album (available in 16/44.1, 24/96, and 24/192). Sales of these rst two binaural albums support future such
projects, and there are a lot of binaural ideas we would like to be able explore in the future!
HEAD-FI MEETS ALL OVER THE WORLD:
GREAT SOUND, GREAT MUSIC, GREAT GEAR, FRIENDS FOR LIFE
In my opinion, perhaps the coolest thing about the Head-Fi community is that we like to get together, through
micro-meets, mini-meets, regional meets, and even international meets. One of the things about our hobby that
encourages this is that headphone audio gear is usually quite easy to take places to share with others.
Through these meets, you will likely get to hear all the gear youve previously only read about, but wanted so
badly to try before buying. Youll get to be in the company of like-minded people of wildly varying backgrounds.
And, through these meets, you will almost certainly make friends for life. There are many people Ive met
through this community over the last 11 yearsthrough these meetswholl be friends for the long haul.
Through this community, I feel like I can go anywhere in the world and know therell be at least a couple of
friends to hang out with there.
If you havent been to a Head-Fi meet, I strongly encourage you to do so. The members of this community
independently organize almost all of these meets (and almost always on weekends). So, on virtually any
weekend, somewhere in the world (and often in several places in the world), theres probably a Head-Fi meet
happening. If there havent historically been Head-Fi meets near you, consider organizing one yourself. To plan
a meet, or to see if there are any meets already planned near you, click here to see the Head-Fi meet planning/
organizing forum. To read coverage and impressions from meets that have already occurred, click here.
2012 ROCKY MOUNTAIN AUDIO FEST
(RMAF) AND CANJAM @ RMAF
October 12-14, 2012
At the Denver Marriott Tech Center Hotel in Denver, Colorado
http://www.audiofest.net
http://www.canjam.org
RMAF is easily one of the best consumer-attended high-end audio shows on the planet. And since 2009, Head-Fi
(as a guest of RMAF) has organized the annual CanJam @RMAF, located within RMAF at the Denver Marriott
Tech Center.
CanJam @RMAF is over 12,000 square feet of the best headphone and personal audio gear in the world, with
an international roster of manufacturer exhibitors specically serving the high-end headphone and personal
audio market.
So, in one weekend, all at the same place, for the very affordable price of admission to RMAF, you can attend
one of the best high-end audio shows in the world, and one of the best high-end headphone and personal audio
shows in the world.
Come and hang out with thousands of like-minded audio enthusiasts in Denver from October 12-14, 2012 for
RMAF and CanJam @RMAF!
75

Headphone Buying Guide

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Headphone Buying Guide

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

SPECI AL FEATURES

SUMMIT-FI THE PINNACLE OF AUDIOPHILE PERFORMANCE

Potrebbero piacerti anche