Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Financialstatementsarerecordsthatprovideanindicationoftheorganizationsfinancialstatus. Itquantitatively describesthefinancialhealthofthecompany.Ithelpsintheevaluationofcompanysprospectsandrisksfort hepurposeofmakingbusinessdecisions.Theobjectiveof financialstatementsistoprovideinformationabout thefinancialposition,performanceandchangesinfinancialpositionofanenterprisethatisusefultoawidera ngeofusersinmakingeconomic relevant,reliable comparable.Theygiveanaccuratepictureofacompanysconditionandoperatingresultsina condensedform.Reportedassets,liabilitiesandequityaredirectlyrelatedtoanorganization's financialpositionwhereasreportedincomeandexpensesaredirectly relatedtoanorganization's decisions.Financial statements should be understandable, and
limitedworkhasbeendoneonanalysisandinterpretationoffinancialstatementsofIndianforminingcompa nies.Anattempthasbeencarriedoutinthisprojecttoanalyzeandinterpretthe fivecoal andnon-coal miningcompanies. OBJECTIVES To understand, analyze and interpret the basic concept of financial statements of different mining companies. Interpretation of financial ratios and their significance. financialstatements of
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Financial statements (orfinancialreports)are formal records of the financial activities of a business,person, orotherentity.
inastructuredmannerandinaformeasytounderstandiscalledthefinancialstatements.There arefourbasic financialstatements: 1.Balancesheet:It is alsoreferred to asstatement offinancialpositionorcondition,reportsona company'sassets, liabilities,andOwnershipequityasofagivenpointintime. 2.Incomestatement:ItisalsoreferredtoasProfitandLossstatement(or"P&L"),reportsona company'sincome,expenses,andprofitsoveraperiodoftime.Profit&Lossaccountprovideinfo rmationontheoperation oftheenterprise.Theseincludesaleandthevariousexpenses
incurredduringtheprocessingstate. 3.StatementofRetainedEarnings:Itexplainsthechangesinacompany'sretainedearningsover thereportingperiod. 4.Cash Flow Statement: It reports on a company's cash flow activities, particularly itsoperating, investingandfinancingactivities.
Domestic crude steel production grew at a compounded annual growth rate of 8.4% in the last few years.
Crude steel production capacity of the country is projected to be around 110 million tonne by 201213. 222 Memorandum of Understandings (MOU) have been signed with various states for planned capacity of around 276 million tonnes by 2019-20.
Investments at stake are to the tune of $187 billion in the Steel sector. Increase in the demand of steel in India is expected to be 14% against the global average of 5-6% due to its strong domestic economy, massive infrastructure needs and expansion of industrial production.
Demand of steel in the major industries like infrastructure, construction, housing, automotive, steel tubes and pipes, consumer durables, packaging and ground transportation. Target for $ 1 trillion of investments in infrastructure during the 12th Five Year Plan. Infrastructure projects (like Golden Quadrilateral and Dedicated Freight Corridor) will give boost to the demand in the steel sector in near future. Projected New Greenfield & up-gradation of existing Airport shall keep the momentum up. Increased demand of specialized steel in hi-tech engineering industries such as power generation, automotive petrochemicals, fertilizers etc.
ANALYSIS
Jindal Stainless Ltd.
Table:Balance Sheet of Jindal Stainless Ltd.as at31stMar-2012 Liabilities ShareCapital Reserves &Surplus NetWorth(1) Secured Loans(2) UnsecuredLoans(3) Total Liabilities(1+2+3 Assets Gross Block (-)Acc.Depreciation Net Block (A) CapitalWorkin Prgs. (B) Investments(C) Inventories SundryDebtors CashAnd Bank LoansAnd Advances (i) CurrentLiabilities Provisions (ii) NetCurr.Assets (i -ii) (D) Misc. Expenses(E) TotalAssets (A+B+C+D+E) March-2012 (Rs in millions) 154.70 53,998.50 54,153.20 21,054.90 28,571.60 103,779.70 March-2012 73,629.00 16,170.00 57,459.00 23,180.10 12,334.00 12,099.60 3,914.60 3,089.60 32,789.00 51,892.80 31,258.30 9,858.10 41,116.40 10,776.40 30.20 103,779.70 March-2011 (Rs in millions) 154.00 37,409.80 37,563.80 17,833.90 20,799.60 76,197.30 March-2011 59,189.40 11,831.10 47,358.30 6,604.80 10,361.90 9,805.60 2,873.80 5,779.10 14,537.20 32,995.70 15,335.40 5,819.40 21,154.80 11,840.90 31.40 76,197.30 March-2010 (Rs in millions) 154.00 24,813.30 24,967.30 21,156.10 13,921.10 60,044.50 March-2010 49,290.30 7,817.50 41,472.80 9,378.40 7,098.20 6,424.40 3,203.10 529.70 7,859.40 18,016.60 12,099.10 3,854.80 15,953.90 2,062.70 32.40 60,044.50
Table: Profit & Loss Statement of Jindal Stainless Ltd. March-2012 (Rs in millions) 76,778.30 Sales 1,994.60 OtherIncome 78,772.90 TotalIncome RawMaterial 34,194.20 Cost 7,559.80 Excise Other 8,645.70 Expenses Operating 26,378.60 Profit Interest 2,678.90 Name 23,699.70 GrossProfit 4,330.30 Depreciation ProfitBef. 21,362.00 Tax 4,654.00 Tax 16,708.00 Net Profit OtherNon-1,343.20 Recurring Income Reported 15,364.80 Profit Equity Dividend 853.30 March-2011 (Rs in millions) 53,681.40 573.10 54,254.50 17,274.00 7,634.90 5,813.40 22,959.10 2,430.20 20,528.90 4,515.10 16,584.20 2,655.50 13,928.70 -1,559.10 12,369.60 620.20 March-2010 (Rs in millions) 35,230.80 360.80 35,591.60 10,685.00 3,967.10 6,480.60 14,098.10 1,731.90 12,366.20 3,364.70 9,359.60 2,418.50 6,941.10 88.80 7,029.90 554.30
Ratio Analysis for 2012 Table: Analysis of Financial Ratios for 2012 Sl. No. 01. Ratios Particulars (Rsin millions) Current Assets =51892.80 Current Liabilities =41116.40 Values Remarks
10776.4
Current Ratio = 02. Current Assets Current Liabilities Acidtest or Quick ratio= 03. Quick Assets Current Liabilities Debt-EquityRatio= 04. Long term debt Shareholders Equity Interest Coverage= 05. Operating Profit Interest Operating Profit margin= 06. Operating Profit*100 Sales
1.26
It is not safe.
0.96
It is safe.
0.91
It is good.
9.84
It is not safe.
34%
It is safe.
Sl. No 07.
Ratios
Values
Remarks
30.86%
It is good.
20.01%
It is not desirable.
19.97%
It is not satisfactory
It is satisfactory 39.44%
11.
36.4%
It is satisfactory
Sl. No
Ratios
Values
Remarks
17.32%
It is not good.
0.45
It is not satisfactory.
0.55
It is not satisfactory.
15.
Sales
0.82
It is good.
Ratio Analys is for 2011 Table: Analysis of Financial Ratios for 2011 Sl. No 01. Ratios Particulars (Rsin millions) Current Assets =32,995.70 Current Liabilities =21,154.80 Values Remarks
11840.9
Current Ratio = 02. Current Assets Current Liabilities Acidtest or Quickratio= 03. QuickAssets CurrentLiabilities Debt-EquityRatio= 04. Long termdebt Shareholders Equity Interest Coverage= 05. OperatingProfit Interest Operating Profi tmargin= 06. Operating Profit*100 Sales
1.5
It is not safe.
1.0
It is safe.
1.0
It is good.
9.44
It is not safe.
42%
It is safe.
Sl. No 07.
Ratios
Values
Remarks
38.24%
It is good.
23.04%
It is not good.
26.49%
It is not good.
44.14%
It is satisfactory
11.
44.54%
It is satisfactory
Sl. No
Ratios
Values
Remarks
21.8%
It is not good
0.32
It is not satisfactory.
0.43
It is not satisfactory.
15.
0.83
It is good.
Ratio Analysis for2010 Table: Analysis of Financial Ratios for 2010 Sl. No 01. Ratios Particulars (Rs in millions) Current Assets =18,016.60 Current Liabilities =15,953.90 Values Remarks
2062.7
Current Ratio = 02. Current Assets Current Liabilities AcidtestorQuickratio= 03. QuickAssets CurrentLiabilities Debt-EquityRatio= 04. Longtermdebt ShareholdersEquity InterestCoverage= 05. Operating Profit Interest Operating Profitmargin= 06. OperatingProfit*100 Sales
1.12
It is not satisfactory.
1.40
It is good.
8.14
It is not safe.
40%
It is satisfactory.
Sl. No 07.
Ratios
Values
Remarks
35%
It is satisfactory
08.
19.9%
It is not satisfactory.
09.
21.09%
It is not satisfactory
10.
37.48%
It is safe.
11.
31.9%
It is good.
Sl. No
Ratios
Values
Remarks
17.47%
It is not safe.
0.30
It is not satisfactory.
Operating Ratio= 14. Cost of Goods sold+other Expenses Sales FixedAssets turnover= 15.
Fixed assets sales
0.48
It is not satisfactory
0.61
It is not good.
Table: Summaryof BalanceSheet 2010 (Rs in millions) Current Assets 18016.60 2011 (Rs in millions) 32995.7 2012 (Rs in millions) 51892.80 Remarks Current asset Position has increased. Liquidity position is very good. Fixed Assets have Increased due to increase in gross block. Current Liabilities Have increased marginally. Debts have Increased dueto more investment.
Fixed Assets
57949.4
64325
92973.1
Current Liabilities
3854.80
5819.40
9858.10
35077.2
38633.5
49626.5
Table: Summary of Profit&Loss Statement 2010 (Rs in millions) 35,230.80 2011 (Rs in millions) 53,681.40 2012 (Rs in millions) 76,778.30 Remarks Sales position has doubled. Purchase of raw Material has increased. Operating profit has increased. PBT has increased. Net profit has increased140.7%
Sales
10,685.00
17,274.00
34,194.20
Operating Profit
14,098.10
22,959.10
26,378.60
9,359.60
16,584.20
21,362.00
6,941.10
13,928.70
16,708.00
Tata Steel
Table: Balance Sheet of TataSteel as at 31stmar-2012 Liabilities Share Capital Reserves & Surplus Net Worth(1) Secured Loans(2) Unsecured Loans(3) Total Liabilities(1+2+3) Assets Gross Block (-)Acc.Depreciation Net Block (A) Capital Workin Prgs. (B) Investments(C) Inventories Sundry Debtors Cash And Bank Loans And Advances (i) Current Liabilities Provisions (ii) Net Curr. Assets (i -ii) (D) Misc. Expenses(E) Total Assets (A+B+C+D+E) March-2012 March-20011 March-2010 (Rs in millions) (Rs in millions) (Rs in millions) 62,034.50 62,033.00 7,277.30 235,011.50 297,046.00 39,130.50 230,331.30 566,507.80 March-2012 200,570.10 90,624.70 109,945.40 34,876.80 423,717.80 34,804.70 6,359.80 15,906.00 58,846.10 115,916.60 89,657.60 29,341.90 118,999.50 -3,082.90 1,050.70 566,507.80 210,974.30 273,007.30 35,205.80 145,011.10 453,224.20 March-2011 164,795.90 82,234.80 82,561.10 43,674.50 41,031.90 26,049.80 5,434.80 4,650.40 345,828.40 381,963.40 68,422.60 29,135.20 97,557.80 284,405.60 1,551.10 453,224.20 133,684.20 140,961.50 37,589.20 58,864.10 237,414.80 March-2010 160,294.90 74,863.70 85,431.20 24,974.40 61,061.80 23,329.80 6,316.30 76,813.50 40,259.50 146,719.10 63,492.40 19,304.60 82,797.00 63,922.10 2,025.30 237,414.80
Table: Profit&Loss Statement of Tata Steel March-2012 (Rsin millions) Sales Other Income Total Income Raw Material Cost Excise Other Expenses Operating Profit Interest Name Gross Profit Depreciation Profit Bef.Tax Tax Net Profit Other NonRecurring Income Reported Profit Equity Dividend 243,483.20 3,053.60 246,536.80 82,794.40 24,952.10 43,972.30 91,764.40 14,895.00 76,869.40 9,734.00 70,189.00 21,148.70 49,040.30 2,977.10 52,017.40 11,689.50 March-2011 (Rsin millions) 196,544.10 3,472.80 200,016.90 60,248.00 25,370.20 28,480.50 82,445.40 9,290.30 73,155.10 8,346.10 68,281.80 23,802.80 44,479.00 2,391.30 46,870.30 11,689.30 March-2010 (Rsin millions) 174,526.60 4,851.40 179,378.00 56,799.50 23,041.80 25,547.80 69,137.50 2,512.50 66,625.00 8,192.90 63,283.50 20,404.70 42,878.80 -657.30 42,221.50 9,439.10
Ratio Analysis for 2012 Table Analysis of Financial Ratios for 2012 Sl. No. 01. Ratios Particulars (Rs in millions) Current Assets =115,916.60 Current Liabilities =118,999.50 Values Remarks
-3082.9
Current Ratio = 02. CurrentAssets CurrentLiabilities Acidtest or Quick ratio= 03. QuickAssets CurrentLiabilities Debt-EquityRatio= 04. Longterm debt Shareholders Equity Interest Coverage= 05. Operating Profit Interest Operating Profit margin= 06. Operating Profit*100 Sales
0.97
It is not safe.
0.68
It is not safe.
0.91
It is good.
6.16
It is not safe.
37%
It is good.
Ratios
Values
Remarks
31.57%
It is good.
08.
21.36%
It is not good.
09.
14.87%
It is not good.
10.
23.62%
It is not satisfactory
11.
17.20%
It is not good.
Sl. No
Ratios
Values
Remarks
0.34
It is not satisfactory
Operating Ratio= 14. Cost of Goods sold+other Expenses Sales Fixed Assets turnover= 15.
Fixed assets
Sales
0.52
It is not satisfactory
0.42
It is satisfactory
Ratio Analysis for2011 Table: Analysis of Financial Ratios for 2011 Sl. No. 01. Ratios Particulars (Rs in millions) Current Assets =381963.40 Current Liabilities =97557.80 Current Assets =381963.40 Current Liabilities =97557.80 Values Remarks
284405.6
Current Ratio = 02. Current Assets Current Liabilities Acid testor Quick ratio= 03. Quick Assets Current Liabilities Debt-EquityRatio= 04. Longterm debt Shareholder s Equity Interest Coverage= 05. OperatingProfit Interest Operating Profit margin= 06. Operating Profit*100 Sales
3.92
It is safe
3.64
It is satisfactory
8.87
It is not satisfactory
41%
It is satisfactory
Ratios
Values
Remarks
37.22%
It is good.
08.
23.8%
It is not satisfactory.
09.
19%
It is not safe.
10.
25.01%
It is not good.
11.
21.48%
It is not satisfactory
Sl. No.
Ratios
Values
Remarks
15.73%
It is not safe
0.30
It is not satisfactory
Operating Ratio= 14. Cost of Goods sold + otherExpenses Sales Fixed Assets turnover= 15.
Fixed assets sales
0.45
It is not satisfactory
1.17
It is not safe
Ratio Analysis for2010 Table: Analysis of Financial Ratios for 2010 Sl. No. 01. Ratios Particulars (Rs in millions) Current Assets =146,719.10 Current Liabilities =82,797.00 Current Assets =146,719.10 Current Liabilities =82,797.00 Values Remarks
63922.1
Current Ratio = 02. Current Assets Current Liabilities Acid test or Quick ratio= 03. Quick Assets Current Liabilities Debt-Equity Ratio= 04. Long term debt Shareholder s Equity Interest Coverage= 05. Operating Profit Interest Operating Profit margin= 06. Operating Profit *100 Sales
1.77
It is not satisfactory.
1.49
It is safe.
0.68
It is not safe.
27.51
It is not satisfactory.
39.6%
It is good.
Ratios
Values
Remarks
38.17%
It is satisfactory.
24.19%
It is not satisfactory.
27.24%
It is not good.
44.89%
It is safe.
11.
35.95%
It is good.
Sl. No.
Ratios
Values
Remarks
20.96%
It is not satisfactory.
0.32
It is not good.
Operating Ratio= 14. Cost of Goods sold+other Expenses Sales Fixed Assets turnover= 15.
Fixed assets sales
0.47
It is not good.
1.01
It is not safe.
Summary for Balance Sheet and Profit&Loss Statement Table: Summaryof BalanceSheet 2010 (Rs in millions) Current Assets 146719.10 2011 (Rs in millions) 381963.40 2012 (Rsin millions) 115916.60 Remarks Short term liquidity Available is very less.
Fixed Assets
171467.4
167267.5
568540
Fixed Assets have increased due to increase in investment. Substantial increase In liabilities. Liquidity position is not good. Debts have increased because of more investment.
Current Liabilities
82797
97557.80
118999.50
96453.3
180216.9
269461.8
Table: Summary of Profit&Loss Statement 2010 (Rs in millions) 174,526.6 2011 (Rs in millions) 196,544.10 2012 (Rs in millions) 243,483.20 Remarks Sales have Increased by 39.5 % Expenses have increased.
Sales
56,799.50
60,248.00
82,794.40
Operating Profit
69,137.50
82,445.40
91,764.40
Operating profit has increased. PBT has increased. Net profit has Increased marginally.
63,283.50
68,281.80
70,189.00
42,878.80
44,479.00
49,040.30
FINDINGS
Comparison of Current ratio of Tata Steel and Jindal Stainless Ltd. from 2007-12
Table: Comparison of Current ratio JSL Dec 2007-08 TATA STEEL 0.71 REMARKS JSL has a Better ratio JSL has a Better ratio Tata Steel has a Better ratio TATA STEEL has a better ratio JSL has a better Ratio
1.34
1.26
0.72
1.1
1.77
1.5
3.92
1.26
0.97
From the above table, it can be concluded that current ratio of JSL Ltd. Was always more than 1 from 2007-12. Short term liquidity of Jindal Stainless Ltd. Was good as current ratio was more than 1. Liquidity position of Tata steel was not satisfactory as the ratio varied from 0.71 to 0.97 in five years.
In the period of 5 years JSL has improved its liquidity position compared to TATA STEEL, while a position of Tata Steel has come down. Current ratio of Tata Steel decreased steeply from 2007 -09 due toitsdecrease in current assets position.
Comparison of Debt Equity ratio JSL and TATA STEEL Companies from 2007-12 Table: Comparison of DebtEquity ratio JSL TATA STEEL Remarks
1.13
0.38
1.48
0.25
1.4
0.68
0.66
JSL has a better ratio JSL & Tata Steel has a Better ratio
0.91
0.91
From table it can be seen that Debt position of JSL was satisfactory as the ratio varied from 1.13 to 0.91 from 2007-12 because of increasing investment. However D-E ratio of Tata Steel remained less than 1 from 2007-12 as their debts were paid off. JSL has the highest debt equity ratio of 1.48 and 1.40 from 2008-09 compared to TATA STEEL.Tata Steel has improved its ratio from 0.38 to 0.91 in five years.Though owner s share in the company has decreased but more outsiders have started investing in the company and that has lead to desirable ratio.
Comparison of Net Profit margin of JSL and TATA STEEL companies from 2007-12 Table: Comparison of Net Profit Margin JSL TATA STEEL REMARKS
Dec2007-08
22.88%
23.97%
TATA STEEL has a better net profit margin. TATA STEEL has a better net profit margin. TATA STEEL has a better net profit margin. TATA STEEL has a better net profit margin. TATA STEEL has a better net profit margin.
Dec2008-09
22.33%
23.17%
Dec2009-10
19.9%
24.19%
Dec, 2010-11
23.04%
23.8%
Dec, 2011-12
20.01%
21.36%
From Table it can be seen that TATA STEEL has the highest profit margin in all the five years which is because of their increase in sales. Profit Margin of GMDC came down from 28.04% to 23.6% from 2007 -12 . Though sales of the company increased , their profit percentage decreased from 2007-12 due to their decrease in net profit.
Comparison of ROI of Different Companies from 2007-12 Table : Comparison of ROI JSL Tata Steel Remarks Tata steel has a better ratio TATA STEEL has a Better ratio TATA STEEL has a better ratio JSL has a Better ratio JSL has a Better ratio
Dec 2007-08
52.31%
74.57%
39.64%
53.28%
37.48%
44.89%
44.14%
25.01%
39.44%
23.62%
From the above table it can be seen that ROI of Tata Steel was highest in 2004-05 with 74.57% and then it declined to 23.62%. Similarly ROI of JSPL decreased from 52.31 % to 39.41 % due to significant increase in its expenses.
CONCLUSION Analysis and interpretation of financial statements is an important tool in assessing companys performance. It reveals the strengths and weaknesses of a firm. It helps the clients to decide in which firm the risk is less or in which one they should invest so that maximum benefit can be earned. It is known that investing in any company involves also to risk.So before putting up money in any company one must have thorough knowledge about its past records and performances.Based on thedata available the trend of the company can be predicted in near future. This project mainly focuses on the basics of different types of financial statements. Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss statements of different coal and non coal mining companies have been studied. Short term liquidity position of JSL in 2010 was good. However, current ratio, quick ratio, net profit margin, return on assets, return on investments and return on capital employed were unsatisfactory. The ratios that are found to be desirable are debt-equity ratio, operating profit margin and gross profit margin. In 2011-12, networking capital available with the company was adequate. The ratios that were found to be satisfactory are quick ratio, debt-equity ratio, return on investments, return on net worth, operating profit margin and gross profit margin. Current ratio, return on capital employed, return on assets and net profit margin of the company were unacceptable. For Tata Steel in 2010, networking capital, quick ratio, return on investments, return on net worth, operating profit margin and gross profit margin of the company were satisfactory. However, debtequity ratio, current ratio, net profit margin, return on capital employed and Return on assets were undesirable. In 2011, only companys current ratio improved due to substantial increase in current assets position. In 2012, networking capital available was inadequate. Companys debt-equity ratio, operating profit margin and gross profit margin were desirable and current ratio, return on investments, return on net worth, return on capital employed and return on assets were found to be unsatisfactory.
In this project, comparison of different ratios viz. Current ratio, debt-equity ratio, net profit margin and return on investment of all the companies from 2007-12 has been done. It was observed Current ratio of Jindal Stainless Ltd. Was satisfactory as it remained more than 1 for all the five years. Liquidity position of Tata steel was not satisfactory as the ratio varied
marginally from 0.71 to 0.97 in five years. Debt position of JSL was satisfactory as the ratio varied from 1.13 to 0.91 from 2007-12. However D E ratio of Tata Steel was less than 1 in five years as their debts were paid off. Though sales of the company JSL and Tata Steel increased, their profit percentage decreased from 2007-12 due to their decrease in net profit. ROI of Tata Steel was highest in 2007-08 with 74.57% and then it declined to 23.62%. Similarly ROI of JSL decreased from 52.31% to 39.44%.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Khan, M.Y. (1988). Financial Management, Tata Mc-Graw Hill , New Delhi, st 1 edition Bhattacharya, Asish..(2007).IntroductiontoFinancialStatementAnalysis,Elsevier,NewDelhi, 1st edition Wanless,R.M.(1983).FinanceForMineManagement,Chapman&HallLtd,NewYor k, 1st edition Khanna,O.P.(1999).IndustrialEngineeringAndmanagement,DhanpatRai,1 edition ,NewDelhi
st
Web References:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_statements http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balance_sheethttp://en.wikiped ia.org/wiki/Asset http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_statementhttp://en.wi kipedia.org/wiki/Unsecured_loan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_statementhttp://en.wiki pedia.org/wiki/Cash_flow_statement