Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Homosexuality
A. Initial Clarifications
a. b. c. a. b. c. Recent History Trend in Public Opinion Key Issues re The Same-Sex Debate Origins, Pronunciation and Usage Complementary: The Biblical Design Androgyny / Unisex / Ambigender / Polygender: A Popular View The Great Sex Charade: Sexuality as Indicator of Intimacy
d.
e.
B. Models of Sexuality
f.
g.
h. a. b.
A Clever Marketing Strategy: The Use of Spin Positive Rebranding of Homosexuals (e,g Gay less offensive!) Linguistic Manipulation (e.g. Marriage redefined) Marketing Strategy - 4 Ps: Product, Price, Place, Promotion Gay Lobby Tactics Subterfuge: Subversion of Truth by Substituting Propaganda Over-egging The Scientific Evidence Phony Comparison with Racial Discrimination Influencing The Media Creative Arts Role in Challenging Traditional Values Indoctrination in The Schools Consequences of The Revolution: The New Intolerance Reversal Societal Approval in The Public Domain Intolerance Towards Traditionalists Pressure to Moderate Personal Beliefs and Conform Totalitarian Belligerence of Political Correctness. Church under attack from gay protest groups. Hounding of Traditionalists Professional Pressure on Therapy Research and Practice Pressure to Ban Reparative Therapy Societys Slippery Slope The Progression of the Social Status of Homosexuality Incremental Steps Gay Lobbyists Goal: Normalisation of Homosexuality. False Assurances of A Soft Revolution. Western Culture Shift Now Pedophiles Follow Gay Tactics UK Governments association with the LBGT lobby. Plausibility of Same Sex Behaviour The Chief arguments Summarised For and Against Approval Liberties Threatened: Injustice in Governmental Decision-Making Shutting Down Opposition to The Gay Agenda Civil and Religious Liberties at Risk Potential Areas of Conflict Traditionalist Response to Homosexual Behaviour Discrimination: Who? How? Why? Where? What? When? Discrimination a neutral concept Discrimination and Political Correctness. The Morality (or Otherwise) of Homosexual Practice
b.
c.
c. d. e.
f.
Love is the same; the institution should be the same. (Political) Marriage is always evolving. Thereve been myriad changes. (Evolutionary) SSM will strengthen marriage. (Naive) SSM wont diminish my marriage. (Red Herring!)
D. Arguments Against Same-Sex Marriage a. An Empty Pretence b. Rights (Entitlements) distinct from Right (As Opposed to Wrong) Distinguish: Right and Wrong: what is true, honest and good. Right and Proper: what is just and equitable. Human Rights: moral or legal entitlements. c. Confusions and Inconsistencies d. Why Complementarity Matters e. The Good of Traditional Marriage Undermined: Archbishop of Canterburys objections to SSM f. Against Nature and Revelation: A Catholic Defense of Marriage g. Politics: An English Objection A Scottish Objection h. A Liberal Case Against Gay Marriage Divine Design v. Social Construct Liberationist or Post-Modern View of Marriage Traditional Christian View of Marriage Later Modifications The Notion of The Priority of Happiness Marriage as mutual support between two sexual partners. Public Celebration of Gay Marriage Imposes on Traditionalists.
b. c. d.
e.
b.
c. d.
e.
B. Biblical Interpretation a. Crucial Tenets of Hermeneutics Understand The Literary Genre Employed Note the Literal Context Note the Cultural Context View The Big Picture b. Skewed Hermeneutics: OT o Old Interpretations Modified In The Light of Experience o Laws Adapt To Changing Times. o How Relevant Are Old Testament Texts? o Anti-homosexual laws merely about national identity (being different). o Arent Traditionalists Being Selective about OT Texts Anyway? NT & Jesus o Privileging One Theme of Scripture o The compass of Jesus and a trajectory of Scripture that trumps proof texts. o Slavery: The Trajectory of Scripture Against It Encourages a Change of Attitude. o The Silence of Jesus Loving, Committed, Long-term SS Relationships: How Relevant Is The Bible Evidence? o The Bible is only against bad (promiscuous) sex, not good (committed) sex. o The Bible does not address the contemporary issue of cohabiting faithful gays. o David and Jonathan exhibited a committed consensual homosexual relationship. o Positive Biblical Values (love, justice, etc) trump more negative texts. Does the Bible really say what we think it does? o Extreme exegesis justifying orgies!
C. The Biblical Evidence a. The Key Texts 1 Thessalonians 4:3-10 How should we behave today? (Genre: Exhortation) Genesis 1 & 2 What did God create? (Genre: Creation Story) Genesis 19 & Judges 19 What decadent behaviour resulted from godlessness? (Genre: Narrative) Leviticus 18 & 20 What is the moral law on sexual practice? (Genre: Law) Romans 1:24-27 Why did Paul condemn same sex acts? (Genre: Apologetic) Matthew 19:3-8 What would Jesus say? (Genre: Gospel Narrative: Teaching) John 8:3-11 What would Jesus do? (Genre: Gospel Narrative: Action) 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 How serious is sexual immorality? (Genre: Letter: Teaching) Galatians 5:19-21 What are the eternal consequences of sexual immorality (and other fleshly behaviour)? (Genre: Letter: Exhortation) 1 Timothy 1:4b-11 What role does the Law play in the teaching associated in the Gospel? (Genre: Letter: Teaching) 1 Thessalonians 4:3-10 How should we behave today? (Genre: Exhortation) b. Pauls Teaching in Romans His categories: Married and Unmarried (not homosexual and Heterosexual!) Suppression of truth > idolatry > decadent behaviour Idolatry involves role-reversal We are all born with a tendency to sin c. The Seriousness of Homosexual Sin d. Conclusions Regarding Biblical Teaching Human sexuality: a story of warped desires being disciplined and re-ordered. The biblical proscription of same-sex intercourse is absolute, pervasive and severe. !