Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. Introduction
This simple spreadsheet assessment tool is for use in initial assessments of the probity risk associated with tenders. It assists in deciding whether to appoint a probity adviser/auditor for a particular tender. This application is a screening guide only and is not a substitute for a comprehensive assessment.
* DTF would like to acknowledge that the idea for this Probity Risk Assessment Tool originated with the Victorian WorkCover Authority.
Probity Risk Assessment Tool Version 2.1 Release Date: June 2009, Revision 1 Release Date: September 2009
Questions Tender characteristics The total value of the tender is? NB: Government policy for a tender value>$10m requires preparation of a project-specific procurement conduct plan.
Answers
Place an x below
>$10m between $1m - $10m between $150 000 - $1m < $150 000 Time is critical Time is reasonably important Time is not a driver Very tight time schedule Time schedule manageable Large contingency in timeline Yes, high media interest Of medium interest Of little interest High (>$1m &/or 8 months) Med (>$150 000 &/or 2 months) Low (< $150 000 & < 4 months)
What investment is expected on the part of each tenderer in submission of the tender? (e.g. in money and time from initial engagement until contract award)
Election commitment Press release Verbal ministerial commitment No public commitment Essential Important Not linked Essential Important Not linked >$10M /annum between $1m - $10m /annum between $150 000 - $1m /annum < $150 000 /annum Nil Nil Some experience Very experienced: successful track record Yes No Partnerships Victoria Construction Goods & services Unknown History of challenging probity Some likelihood Challenge considered unlikely
To what extent is the program/project a pre-requisite for the successful delivery of a major legislative requirement?
To what extent is the program/project a pre-requisite for the successful delivery of a major policy?
What impact will the project have on government annual budgets from projected revenues?
What is the allocated team's experience of successful delivery of this type of program/project?
Are there third-party revenue opportunities for bidders in the project arrangement?
Is the industry that will respond to the tender known for challenging probity?
Probity Risk Assessment Tool Version 2.1 Release Date: June 2009, Revision 1 Release Date: September 2009
Place an x below
Effective competition How widely is the tender advertised? Selected tenderers Restricted invitation Public advertisement Multiple without prime contractor Multiple with prime contractor Single supplier Unknown Small no. or selected respondents <10 respondents expected >10 respondents expected How mature is the prospective market in delivering or meeting the needs of this program/project? Immature market: no tender experience Some experience Very experienced: successful tender track record
What is the market structure of potential respondents to the tender? (numbers expected to respond)
The tender process How many projects of this value has the project manager managed - or time in industry? Little or no experience Some experience >2 years or >4 projects > 10 years or >10 projects Unknown Yes No Are sub-contract firms likely to appear within multiple bid teams or consortia? Unknown Yes No
Are there likely to be firms which respond within multiple bid teams or consortia?
Accountability Do the Accountable Officer (or delegate) and the procurement team have a good understanding of government requirements for probity? Very experienced Some experience No experience
Consistency and transparency of process Are the project documents based on standard procurement documents? Yes No
Evaluation How clearly are project objectives articulated and how well are they linked to the tender evaluation criteria? Evaluation criteria unclear Some links exist Very clear articulation
Security and confidentiality Is the agency experienced at processes for receiving and managing bid information? Yes No
Probity Risk Assessment Tool Version 2.1 Release Date: June 2009, Revision 1 Release Date: September 2009
Conflict of interest How likely is it that members of the project and evaluation team will have material contact with prospective tenderers during the tender process as part of social engagements or business-as-usual activities? How likely is it that members of the project and evaluation team members will have previous or existing social or professional relationships with any of the prospective tenderers? Very likely Some likelihood No contact likely Very likely Some likelihood No contact likely Very experienced Some experience No experience
Place an x below
Is the project manager experienced in managing potential or actual conflicts of interest that may arise?
Probity Risk Assessment Tool Version 2.1 Release Date: June 2009, Revision 1 Release Date: September 2009
Probity Risk Assessment Results Risk Rating Tender Characteristics #N/A Conflict of interest/Confitentiality #N/A #N/A
A tender with a HIGH probity risk rating will require the appointment of a probity practitioner. It is also advisable to examine those areas of the assessment with high scores to determine if additional treatment of the risk is required before continuing with the tender process.
A tender with a MEDIUM probity risk rating requires careful considation of the appointment of a probity practitioner. The decision will need to be based on a balance of the risks identified against the costs involved in that appointment. Areas identified at a medium or higher rating should be examined for opportunities for improvement and reduction of the risk.
A tender with a LOW probity risk may not require a probity practitioner.
Probity Risk Assessment Tool Version 2.1 Release Date: June 2009, Revision 1 Release Date: September 2009