TD LTE Primer

TD-LTE Overview
November 2012 Bong Youl (Brian) Cho, brian.cho@nsn.com
Contents
Why TD-LTE? NSN with TD-LTE TD-LTE technology overview
TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 2 Nokia Siemens Networks
Why TD-LTE?
Difference b/w 3G-TDD and 4G-TDD

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 GSM/GPRS/EDGE enhancements
Rel 99
W-CDMA
Rel 4
1.28Mcps TDD
Rel 5
HSDPA, IMS
Rel 6
HSUPA, MBMS, IMS+

Rel 7
HSPA+ (MIMO, HOM etc.)

Rel 8
OFDM MIMO
LTE, SAE
Rel 9 enhancements
Small LTE/SAE
Rel 10 LTE-Advanced
Rel 11 LTEAdvanced
Global TDD Situation
4+ Frequencies
2.3 2.6 1.9 2.5 Global Global Russia, China Japan
50+ Countries
60% World Pops
50% Land-Mass
Informa
Over 50% of operators planning to deploy TDLTE
3GPP E-UTRA TDD frequency bands

Uplink (UL) operating band BS receive UE transmit FUL_low FUL_high
1900 MHz 2010 MHz 1850 MHz 1930 MHz 1910 MHz 2570 MHz 1880 MHz 2300 MHz 2496 MHz 3400 MHz 1920 MHz 2025 MHz 1910 MHz 1990 MHz 1930 MHz 2620 MHz 1920 MHz 2400 MHz 2690 MHz 3600 MHz
E-UTRA Operating Band

33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
Downlink (DL) operating band BS transmit UE receive FDL_low FDL_high

1900 MHz 2010 MHz 1850 MHz 1930 MHz 1910 MHz 2570 MHz 1880 MHz 2300 MHz 2496 MHz 3400 MHz 1920 MHz 2025 MHz 1910 MHz 1990 MHz 1930 MHz 2620 MHz 1920 MHz 2400 MHz 2690 MHz 3600 MHz
Duplex Mode
TDD TDD TDD TDD TDD TDD TDD TDD TDD TDD
43
44
3600 MHz
703 MHz
3800 MHz
803 MHz
3600 MHz
703 MHz
3800 MHz
803 MHz
TDD
TDD
LTE-FDD, TD-LTE Integration

Fully integrated over time
FDD-LTE FDD-LTE & TD-LTE
TD-LTE / FDD-LTE Transparent hand over
Global Roaming
Standards Integration Product Integration
TD-LTE
Maximized commonality b/w FDD and TDD for high level of integration/interworking
TD-LTE Capacity
Mbps
35 30 25 20 15
Similar spectral efficiency for TD-LTE and LTE-FDD

FDD-LTE DL = 10MHz UL = 10MHz
Similar Spectrum Efficiency
TD-LTE config.1 DL/UL = 4/4 timeslots Similar DL and UL capacity as in FDD
TD-LTE config.2 DL/UL = 6/2 timeslots Optimized for very asymmetric traffic
FDD-LTE DL = 20MHz UL = 20MHz Double spectrum = double capacity
DL/UL Ratio Flexibility
10 5
Downlink
Uplink
FDD 2 x 10MHz
TD-LTE 1 x 20MHz TD-LTE 1x20MHz
( FDD 2 x 20MHz )
TD-LTE a very relevant tool for every operator

True 4G performance
Comparable Performance FDDLTE
Traditional CSP Augment FDD-LTE Increased Capacity (Overlay/Underlay) or specific Apps (M2M, Video Broadcast)
Global & Local Roaming

TD-LTE / FDD-LTE / 3GPP / 3GPP2
Greenfield TD-LTE main LTE network

Global roaming + potential MVNO capability with other 3GPP/3GPP2 operators for underlay in early deployment stage with transparent
Affordable Spectrum
Sold for 10x less than FDD equivalent
Economy of Scale
LTE Momentum Driving
Common Network Hardware TD-LTE Early Market Opportunity
Large Operators TD-LTE
WiMAX CSP Possible migration path Leverage current spectrum asset Scope for evolution to TD-LTE when time is
right
Opportunities Driving the Device Economy of Scale
TD-LTE Applications
Leveraging Flexible DL/UL Ratio

Transport On-Board Infotainment
- Layer coverage of transport networks for added capacity and supporting the infotainment nature of the likely applications used during transport - Leverage Very High Downlink Capacity for fixed line BB like service for supporting more subscribers and high quality and innovative applications
DL Bias Use Case
Surveillance & Video based M2M

Spot Coverage of Crowd Based Events/Gathering, Public Safety Incidents / Traffic Monitoring, Hazardous places access, Remote People monitoring, ... - Leverage HD quality video uplink, responsive service with very long distance remote control capabilities
UL Bias Use Case
Mobile Reporter
- TD-LTE enable report to leverage the power of now in the field and with HD Quality and instantaneity for live studio-like dialog - Avoid Complex, Slow & Costly deployment of TV vehicles on site
UL Bias Use Case

NSN with TD-LTE
Nokia Siemens Networks LTE references 67 commercial LTE customers

Canada Canada Sweden Sweden Latvia Latvia
TD-LTE
Korea
USA IMS USA

TD-LTE
Denmark
Denmark
Finland
Finland
Lithuania
Russia
Korea
USA
Germany
Germany
Estonia
Estonia
TD-LTE
Poland
South Korea
Brazil
61 32 35
France
Croatia
Austria
Slovenia
India
Singapore
Japan
LTE radio deals (incl. 8 TD-LTE) LTE EPC deals commercially launched networks (incl. 5 TD-LTE)
Portugal
Italy
TD-LTE
Azerbaijan
Bahrain
Australia
Japan
UAE
LTE supplier to the largest operators in Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia Japan and Korea
Japan
TD-LTE Developments
Award
Progress Demos since 2009 Commercial deals since 2011 Significant deployments 2012 7 commercial deals to date (leading)
The Economic Figure of the Year of the China Information Industry

for NSN innovation & leadership in TD-LTE China Information Industry Economic Conference Beijing, Dec 1st 2011
Worlds 1st
Simultaneou s multiple UE TD-LTE connection
Worlds 1st
TD-LTE drive tour at ITU Geneva
Worlds 1st
1st TaiwanMainland TD-LTE live HD video 2.3GHz MIIT field trial test
We are here
3 Large scale trials slots in CMCC large field trial
Worlds 1st
3GPP R8 TD-LTE call & HO
Worlds 1st
1st CMCC/ VDF proof of tech. 1st TD-LTE Femto cell demo
Worlds 1st
3GPP R8 TD-LTE E2E L3 call with comm. EPC
100% pass MIIT lab test E2E call with throughput >80Mbps end-to-end
1st TD-LTE trial network parallel connecting to CMCC, Shanghai Expo
1st TD LTETD SCDMA video call controlled by IMS

1st TD-LTE TDSCDMA concurrent mode
1st TD-LTE demo in India & Russia IOT with UE vendors (incl. Altair, Sequans, HiSilicon, Innofidei, Qualcomm)
Worlds 1st
1st TD-LTE Open Lab
Successful trials in India and Russia Leading vendor in MIT 2.6 GHz field trial
First 1.3Gbps demo for LTE-A with CMCC

First to finish CMCC Ph1 large scale testing (97%)
2009
2010
2011
2012
NSN extends TD-LTE speed record in China
TD-LTE technology overview
Duplexing
FDD
TDD
Duplexing contd
LTE FDD vs TD-LTE

Same RF Structure, Same Resource Block => Same RF Power/Time/Bandwidth Density
Same Power Transmitted during the Same amount of time as FDD-LTE
LTE FDD
Spectrum
Power Time
TD-LTE
DL 10W
Single UL Frame Resource Block

DL
UL
10ms
1/5 W 5MHz 5MHz
5W
10ms 1/5 W 5ms
UL
10MHz
3GPP LTE FDD vs. LTE TDD

High degree of commonality
Features Frame structure Switching points BS Synchronization DL Control Channel UL Control Channel PRACH Special slot usage LTE FDD 1ms sub-frame N/A Asynchronous/Synchronous Can schedule 1 DL and 1 UL sub-frame at a time Single ACK/NAK corresponding to 1 DL sub-frame 0,1,2,3 N/A LTE TDD 1ms sub-frame 5ms periodicity and 10 ms periodicity Synchronous Can schedule 1 DL and multiple UL sub-frame at a time Multiple ACK/NAK corresponding to multiple DL sub-frame 0,1,2,3,4 (Short RACH) DwPTS: RS, Data and Control UpPTS: SRS and Short RACH Same
Numerology, Coding, Multiple Same Access, MIMO support, RS etc. HARQ Timing N=8 stop-and-wait protocol DL: Async, UL: Sync
TBD DL: Async, UL: Sync
High Degree of Commonality
LTE FDD vs. TDD performance comparison

TD-LTE
Spectral Efficiency
FDD-LTE
+ +
TD-LTE can adapt to DL/UL traffic ratio (typical of internet traffic) Slightly longer latency
Negligible advantage (No need of switching) Fix bandwidth for DL & UL (typical of voice traffic)
DL/UL Balancing Latency

Real Life Performance
+
+
Dedicated UL/DL pipes (no need to wait for UL or DL slot)
Comparable Subscriber Experience
Coverage
Spectrum Flexibility Coexistence New Spectrum Pricing
Better in big-sized cells
+ +
Paired-band is not needed, no duplexing gap Coexistence requirement for adjacent frequency in the same geographic area TDD Spectrum had traditionally auctioned for lower $/MHz
+
Because of higher demand FDD has so far sold for higher $/MHz
Frame Structure
Type 1 for FDD
One radio frame, Tf = 307200Ts=10 ms One slot, Tslot = 15360Ts = 0.5 ms #0 #1 #2 #3 #18 #19
One subframe
Type 2 for TDD

One radio frame, Tf = 307200Ts = 10 ms One half-frame, 153600Ts = 5 ms
One slot, Tslot=15360Ts
30720Ts
Subframe #0 One subframe, 30720Ts DwPTS GP
Subframe #2
Subframe #3
Subframe #4
Subframe #5
Subframe #7
Subframe #8
Subframe #9
UpPTS
DwPTS
GP
UpPTS
Frame Structure: FDD/TDD
TD-LTE: UL/DL configurations
Subframe number Configuration 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Switch-point periodicity 0 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms 5 ms D D D D D D D 1 S S S S S S S 2 U U U U U U U 3 U U D U U D U 4 U D D U D D U 5 D D D D D D D 6 S S S D D D S 7 U U U D D D U 8 U U D D D D U 9 U D D D D D D
TD-LTE: UL/DL configurations
TD-LTE:
Special subframe config for max cell range
* assuming Normal CP
Mapping of control channels to TDD config #1
<cf> FDD LTE
Coexistence among neighboring TDD systems
Typical RF interference scenario for a TDD
Coexistence b/w TD-SCDMA and TD-LTE
Coexistence b/w WiMAX (16e) and TD-LTE
System Information
Master information block (MIB) includes the following information:
Downlink cell bandwidth [4 bit] System Frame Number (SFN) except two LBSs Etc
LTE defines different SIBs:

SIB1 includes info mainly related to whether an UE is allowed to camp on the cell. This includes info
about the operator(s) and about the cell (e.g. PLMN identity list, tracking area code, cell identity, minimum required Rx level in the cell, etc), DL-UL subframe configuration in TDD case, and the scheduling of the remaining SIBs. SIB1 is transmitted every 80ms.
SIB2 includes info that UEs need in order to be able to access the cell. This includes info about the UL
cell BW, random access parameters, and UL power control parameters. SIBs also includes radio resource configuration of common channels (RACH, BCCH, PCCH, PRACH, PDSCH, PUSCH, PUCCH, and SRS).
SIB3-4 mainly includes info related to cell-reselection. SIB5-8 include neighbor-cell-related info. (E-UTRAN, UTRAN, GERAN, cdma2000) SIB9 contains a home eNB identifier SIB10/11 contains ETWS (Earthquake and Tsunami Warning System) notification SIB12: CMAS SIB13: eMBMS More to be added
MIB mapped to PBCH, Other SIBs mapped to PDSCH

Coexistence b/w TDD and FDD
MIMO Spatial Multiplexing (SM)

Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) Multiple antennas at both transmitter and receiver MIMO uses multipath to advantage to multiply data rate Transmits different data along different paths (simplified view) MxN MIMO can multiply data rate by M or N (whichever is less) if there is enough multipath.

Best in urban high-multipath environment (and indoors) Less effective in suburban and rural low-multipath environments
How can we get multiplexing?

Simple concept
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Transmit one data in one link (1 Tx & 1 Rx antenna) Transmit two data in two links far away from each other (1 Tx & 1 Rx antenna, respectively) Transmit two data in one link (1 Tx & 1 Rx antenna) ??
Transmit two data in one link (2 Tx & 2 Rx antenna) ??
(4) is just the special case of (2)!!
Simple linear algebra

Matrix () Rank
Favorable channel condition for MIMO SM?

Rich scattering (i.e. multipath) for high rank High SINR for reliable decoding
SVD MIMO as a closed-loop MIMO

In CL-SU-MIMO, SVD-MIMO is the optimum
MIMO Channel Decomposition
MIMO Channel Decomposition

1
~ w 1
x
~ x
V VH
n
min
Channel
U
~ w nmin
UH
~ y
Pre-processing
Post-processing
With number of transmitting antenna=nt and receiving antenna=nr,
y Hx w x C nt , y C nr , w ~ (0, N 0 I nr )
Channel Diagonalization
H ~ yU y
U (Hx w )
H
U H (UDV H x w ) U H (UDV H V~ x w) D~ x UHw
~ ~ y D~ xw
Codebook for Precoding 2 ports
For transmission on two antenna ports, p 0,1 , the precoding matrix W (i) shall be selected from Table 6.3.4.2.3-1 or a subset thereof.
Codebook for Precoding 4 ports
The quantity Wn denotes the matrix defined by the columns given by the set {s} H H un un where I is the 4x4 identity matrix and the from the expression Wn I 2unun vector u n is given by Table 6.3.4.2.3-2.
{s}
3GPP Release 8 DL transmission modes

Two approaches to multi-antenna transmission
MIMO CQI PMI Rank CRS MCS PMI Rank Beamforming
CQI SRS DRS
If UE uses multiple receive antennas, it also has to transmit SRS on multiple antennas in order for UL measurements to fully reflect DL channel state
MCS
PDSCH Channel estimation based on common reference signal (CRS) Closed loop, codebook precoding (TM4)
PDSCH Channel estimation based on dedicated reference signal (DRS) Open loop, non-codebook precoding (TM7)
Multi-Antenna Technology Summary

Diversity
Same data on all the pipes (mode 2)
Increased coverage and link quality But, the all pipes can be combined to make a kind-of beamforming
MIMO
Different data streams on different pipes (mode 4)
Increased spectral efficiency (increased overall throughput) Power is split among the data streams
Beamforming
Data stream on only the strongest pipe (mode 7) Utilize different amplitude/phase at all pipes to optimally match per-UE
radio condition
Increased coverage and signal SNR
3GPP Release 9/10 DL transmission modes

Enhanced beamforming: dual-layer beamforming (TM8) Multi-layer (TM9)
CQI PMI Rank
SRS DRS MCS Rank With cross polar antennas in mind TDD operators have been eager to extend Rel8 Beamforming to support two streams. Spatial multiplexing supported - Up to 2 layers per user (SU-MIMO) - Up to 4 layer in total (MU-MIMO) CRS based PMI and rank reporting supported for beamforming - Similar feedback schemes as for Rel-8 SUMIMO (tx-mode 4) - TxD CQI also supported - One CRS per polarization via sector beam virtualization (as in Rel-9)
PDSCH Channel estimation based on DRS

PDSCH Transmission Modes

Mode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Details Single-antenna transmission Transmit diversity Open-loop codebook-based precoding in the case of more than one layer, transmit diversity in the case of rank-one transmission Closed-loop codebook-based precoding Multi-user-MIMO version of transmission mode 4 Special case of closed-loop codebook-based precoding limited to single-layer transmission Release-8 non-codebook-based precoding supporting only single-layer transmission Release-9 non-codebook-based precoding supporting up to two layers Release-10 non-codebook-based precoding supporting up to eight layers
Cell-Specific RS Mapping
RS Overhead
R0 R0
One antenna port
Normal CP 1 Tx ant 4.76% 9.52% 14.29% 2 Tx ant 4 Tx ant

l6
Extended CP 5.56% 11.11% 15.87%
R0
R0
R0
R0
R0
l0
R0
l6 l0
Resource element (k,l)
R0
R0
R1
R1
Two antenna ports
R0
R0
R1
R1
Not used for transmission on this antenna port
R0
R0
R1
R1
Reference symbols on this antenna port
R0
l0
R0
l6 l0 l6 l0
R1
l6 l0
R1
l6
R0
R0
R1
R1
R2
R3
Four antenna ports
R0
R0
R1
R1
R2
R3
R0
R0
R1
R1
R2
R3
R0
l0
R0
l6 l0 l6 l0
R1
l6 l0
R1
l6 l0
R2
l6 l0 l6 l0
R3
l6 l0 l6
TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 45 Nokia Siemens Antenna portNetworks 0
even-numbered slots
odd-numbered slots
even-numbered slots
odd-numbered slots
even-numbered slots
odd-numbered slots
even-numbered slots
odd-numbered slots
Antenna port 1
Antenna port 2
Antenna port 3
UE-specific RS (R5) on top of CRS

UE-specific RS (antenna port 5)
12 symbols per RB pair DL CQI estimation is always based on cell-specific RS (common RS)
New DM-RS for scalability
Multi-Antenna Technology Summary

Diversity
Same data on all the pipes (mode 2)
Increased coverage and link quality But, the all pipes can be combined to make a kind-of beamforming
MIMO
Different data streams on different pipes (mode 4)
Increased spectral efficiency (increased overall throughput) Power is split among the data streams
Beamforming
Data stream on only the strongest pipe (mode 7) Utilize different amplitude/phase at all pipes to optimally match per-UE
radio condition
Increased coverage and signal SNR Not any more focusing on the strongest pipe in transmission mode 8 in R9 and mode 9 in R10
LTE FDD vs TD-LTE link budget comparison

(700MHz example)
3GPP Defined LTE CA Band Combinations

Release 10

Band1 + Band5 LG U+ LTE_CA_B1_B7: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 1 and Band 7 LTE_CA_B1_B18: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 1 and Band 18 LTE_CA_B1_B19: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 1 and Band 19 LTE_CA_B1_B21: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 1 and Band 21 LTE_CA_B2_B17: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 2 and Band 17 LTE_CA_B3_B5: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 5 SK Telecom LTE_CA_B3_B7: LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 7 LTE_CA_B3_B8: LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 8 KT
Release 11 Work Items
LTE_CA_B3_B20: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 3 and Band 20

LTE_CA_B4_B5: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 4 and Band 5 LTE_CA_B4_B7: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 4 and Band 7 LTE_CA_B4_B12: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 4 and Band 12 LTE_CA_B4_B13: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 4 and Band 13 LTE_CA_B4_B17: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 4 and Band 17 LTE_CA_B5_B12: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 5 and Band 12 LTE_CA_B5_B17: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 5 and Band 17 LTE_CA_B7_B20: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 7 and Band 30 LTE_CA_B8_B20: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 8 and Band 20 LTE_CA_B11_B18: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation of Band 11 and Band 18 LTE_CA_B7: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation in Band 7
Carrier aggregation is supported for both FDD and TDD, although all component carriers need to have the same duplex scheme. In the case of TDD, the uplink downlink configuration should be the same across component carriers. The special subframe configuration can be different for the different components carriers though, as long as the resulting downlinkuplink switch time is sufficiently large.
LTE_CA_B25: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation Intra-Band, Non-Contiguous in Band 25
LTE_CA_B38: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation in Band 38

LTE_CA_B41: LTE Advanced Carrier Aggregation in Band 41
CA for TD-LTE
* CA Band Combination
HARQ Retransmission Timing

Acknowledgement of a transport block in subframe n is transmitted in subframe n + k , where k 4 and is selected such that n + k is an uplink subframe
HARQ Acknowledgement Bundling

For DL transmissions, there are some configurations where DL-SCH receipt in multiple DL
subframes needs to be acknowledged in a single UL subframe Multiplexing
Independent acknowledgements for each of the received transport blocks are fed back to the eNodeB. This allows independent retransmission of erroneous transport blocks. However, it also implies that multiple bits need to be transmitted from the terminal.
Bundling of acknowledgements
The outcome of the decoding of DL transport blocks from multiple DL subframes can be combined into a single hybrid-ARQ acknowledgement transmitted in UL. Only if both of the DL transmissions in subframes 0 and 3 in the example below are correctly decoded will a positive acknowledgement be transmitted in UL subframe 7. The downlink assignment index in the scheduling assignment on the PDCCH is used to avoid confusion
UL Grant Timing
For TDD configurations 16, the uplink transmission occurs in subframe n + k , where k is the smallest value larger than or equal to 4 such that subframe n + k is an uplink
subframe.
For TDD configuration 0 there are more UL subframes than DL subframes, which calls for
the possibility to schedule transmissions in multiple UL subframes from a single DL subframe. For DL-UL configuration 0, the index field specifies which UL subframe(s) a grant received in a DL subframe applies to.
Random Access
Short PRACH preamble (format 4) only for TD-LTE (to utilize UpPTS in small cells)
For TDD, multiple random-access regions can be configured in a single subframe.

The reason is the smaller number of uplink subframes per radio frame in TDD. To maintain the same random-access capacity as in FDD, frequency-domain multiplexing is sometimes necessary.
Better Utilization of SRS

SRS (Sounding Reference Signal)
SRS can be used for both DL beamforming and UL CAS
Calibration needed for channel reciprocity

Model to illustrate the impact from RF units to channel reciprocity (capital letters indentify matrixes)
FDD-TDD Handover
FDD - TDD mobility
Network controlled Event triggered based on DL
measurement RSRP and RSRQ Inter frequency measurements triggered by events A1/A2 Configurable thresholds for coverage based (A5), best cell based (A3) handover
S-GW MME
TD-LTE is IMT-Advanced approved too!
TD-LTE is IMT-Advanced approved too!
TD-LTE Summary
Market potential
High level of commonality b/w FDD LTE and TD-LTE

Slight difference in frame structure (FDD vs. TDD) Time synchronized network
Need to ensure coexistence b/w neighboring TDD systems

Better beamforming performance with channel reciprocity Smaller link budget which fits to capacity networks Flexible DL/UL capacity for various applications
Thank you !
www.nokiasiemensnetworks.com Nokia Siemens Networks 20F, Meritz Tower, 825-2 Yeoksam-Dong, Kangnam-Gu Seoul 135-080, Korea
Bong Youl (Brian) Cho

Lead Product Manager Korea, Ph.D. LTE Business Line, MBB brian.cho@nsn.com Mobile 010-4309-4129

TD LTE Primer

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

TD LTE Primer

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

TD-LTE Overview

November 2012 Bong Youl (Brian) Cho, brian.cho@nsn.com

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 2 Nokia Siemens Networks

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 3 Nokia Siemens Networks

Difference b/w 3G-TDD and 4G-TDD

HSUPA, MBMS, IMS+

HSPA+ (MIMO, HOM etc.)

Global TDD Situation

60% World Pops

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 5 Nokia Siemens Networks

3GPP E-UTRA TDD frequency bands

E-UTRA Operating Band

Downlink (DL) operating band BS transmit UE receive FDL_low FDL_high

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 6 Nokia Siemens Networks

LTE-FDD, TD-LTE Integration

Standards Integration Product Integration

Similar spectral efficiency for TD-LTE and LTE-FDD

Similar Spectrum Efficiency

TD-LTE config.1 DL/UL = 4/4 timeslots Similar DL and UL capacity as in FDD

FDD-LTE DL = 20MHz UL = 20MHz Double spectrum = double capacity

DL/UL Ratio Flexibility

TD-LTE 1 x 20MHz TD-LTE 1x20MHz

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 8 Nokia Siemens Networks

TD-LTE a very relevant tool for every operator

Global & Local Roaming

Greenfield TD-LTE main LTE network

Large Operators TD-LTE

Opportunities Driving the Device Economy of Scale

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 9 Nokia Siemens Networks

Leveraging Flexible DL/UL Ratio

DL Bias Use Case

Surveillance & Video based M2M

UL Bias Use Case

UL Bias Use Case

NSN with TD-LTE

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 11 Nokia Siemens Networks

Nokia Siemens Networks LTE references 67 commercial LTE customers

USA IMS USA

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 12 Nokia Siemens Networks

The Economic Figure of the Year of the China Information Industry

1st TD-LTE trial network parallel connecting to CMCC, Shanghai Expo

1st TD LTETD SCDMA video call controlled by IMS

First 1.3Gbps demo for LTE-A with CMCC

NSN extends TD-LTE speed record in China

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 14 Nokia Siemens Networks

TD-LTE technology overview

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 15 Nokia Siemens Networks

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 16 Nokia Siemens Networks

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 17 Nokia Siemens Networks

LTE FDD vs TD-LTE

Same Power Transmitted during the Same amount of time as FDD-LTE

Single UL Frame Resource Block

1/5 W 5MHz 5MHz

10ms 1/5 W 5ms

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 18 Nokia Siemens Networks

3GPP LTE FDD vs. LTE TDD

TBD DL: Async, UL: Sync

High Degree of Commonality

TTA LTE/MIMO Standards/Technology Training 19 Nokia Siemens Networks

LTE FDD vs. TDD performance comparison

DL/UL Balancing Latency

Dedicated UL/DL pipes (no need to wait for UL or DL slot)

Comparable Subscriber Experience

Better in big-sized cells