Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Prof.dr.ing. Faculty of Hydrotechnics, Geodesic and Environmental Engineering, Department of Land Reclamation and Environmental Protection,Technical University Gh. Asachi of Iai 2 Assoc. Prof. Faculty of Hydrotechnics, Geodesic and Environmental Engineering, Department of Land Reclamation and Environmental Protection, Technical University Gh. Asachi of Iai 3 Assist. Prof. Faculty of Hydrotechnics, Geodesic and Environmental Engineering, Department of Land Reclamation and Environmental Protection, Technical University Gh. Asachi of Iai
177
in parallel and are constituted in the so-called [3, 4] hydraulic generators battery (HGB). A variant of functioning for the HGB, , is described via the number of PD of each type, in function, ( m p , m p
II
II
I ) , where 0 m p mp and
II
Fig. 1. Diagram of hydraulic system PBTL-hydrophore Considering its functions, according to [1], in a hydrophore having a total volume VH, the next characteristical volumes can be described (Fig. 2):
178
A water volume needed to prevent the weakening of air cushion, Vo; An anti-surge volume, Vp ; A volume available for flow compensation, Vu , and the R . volume of compressed air, Va , required vor providing the load in the tank, H 2
3. Mathematical Model
The conceived mathematical model is based on the laws which govern the transformation of compressed air volume within the hydrophore, the way in which HGB works together with the water supply network, and, as well, the way in which the generating hydraulic machine works together with the electric driving motor, from a mechanical point of view. In order to fully satisfy at least the water supply networks demands, the piezometrical loads within section k = 2 , H am 2 (t ) , in delivery collector, HC(t), and within compensation tank,
H R (t ) = z f + (t ) + p R
(1)
(2)
be ordered in an augmenting manner function of the HGBs flow, Q ; therefore the next inequalities are satisfied:
0Qv < Q v +1 ,()v { 1, , N v 1}
(3)
In case of continuous functioning there is at least one variant , {1, 2, , N } , for which relations below are verified:
min max Q * =QF,cu H R H am 2 (t ) H R
(4)
The pumping facility with compensation tank works in a cyclic manner when there is a HGBs functioning variant * , * {2, , N v } , in order to simultanously satisfy the next conditions:
max H am 2 (t )> H R , for Q * =QF ;
min H am 2 (t )< H R , pentruQv* 1 = QF .
(5) (6)
In this case we can describe the next: 10 - the compensation tanks filling stage and 20 - the compensation tanks draining stage.
179
During the filling stage, with duration Tu, HGB works in the variant *, min max and the HR load increases from initial value H R to final value H R . During the draining stage, with duration Tg, HGB works in variant * -1, max and the piezometrical load HR is decreasing from initial value H R to final min . value H R Obviously, for the whole cycles duration, it results: T = Tu + Tg (7) Next we will present, classified in groups with remarkable technical meanings, firstly the computing equations needed to model the pumping facility for a continuous regime (quasi-permanent), and next the additional and/or specific equations (corresponding to a variable slow transition regime), which occur in the case of cyclic functioning.
3.1. Mathematical model in case of continuous functioning
This model is described by means of equations given at items a)...l). a) Pumps characteristics at variable speed [3, 4]: - for load,
2 i i i i i i i 2 H i Qp ,n = a H n i + bH Qp ni + cH Qp ,i {I, II};
( )
( )
(8) (9)
- for power,
i i N i Qp , n i = a iN Qp
( )
i i n i + bN Qp ni
( )
i + c iN n i + d N ni
( )
, i {I,II} ;
- for torque,
i i i i M Qp ,n = aM Qp i
(10)
( )
(n )
i 2
i i a1 n s n i
i i i +b1 n +c1
,i{I,II};
(11)
( )
( )
(12)
180
1 ~ ~i M i 1 + r tg j i tg j ne e m
( ) (n )
2
i n i M m i 2
~ i +M m ni + f i
(13)
(14)
( )
(15)
am 2,3 av (t ) = H av H3 2 (t ) h r Q 2 (t ) ,
(16)
Applying technique given in [4] , from equations (8) (11), the next elements have been computed: e) Pumps characteristics , at quasi-constant speed: - for load
i i i i i i H i Qp = aH +bH Qp +cH Qp ,i {I, II}
( )
( )2
(17)
- for power,
i i i i i i N i Qp = aN +bN Qp +c N Qp ,i {I, II}
( )
( )2
(18)
- for torque,
i i i i i i M Qp = aM +bM Qp +cM Qp ,i {I , II } i
( )
( )2
(19)
( )
( )2
(20)
( )
( )
(21)
- for variant , which gives m p 0 and m p = 0, with (i, j ) {I, II} and i j:
i j
i H ( n,Q )=a H +
i bH i mp
Q+
i c H
m ip
Q2
(22)
II
(23)
where:
II b II 1 I b I a H = m p HI + m p H II 2 c H c H I I II b II ;bH = a b a g
( )
( )
cH
(a ) + (a ) ;d =
I 2 II 2
=2
a I a II g
2
;e H = g b II b I
(24)
and in which:
mp
i c H i
a =
;b
i =aH
(b )
i 2 H i 4c H
,cu i {I,II } i g = a I
( ) (a )
2
II 2
(25)
h) Energys equations between the sections of suction tank and those of delivery collector: - for each pump,
i H C = H A + Hi Qp ,cui {I, II}
( )
(26) (27)
- for HGB,
H C = H A + H ( n,Q ).
(28)
(29)
182
p2 Va ( ) = WH z = zf + const.
k) The outline conditions in section k=3
av am av 3 am av av Q3 Q3 =0 . ( t ) = Q3 ( t ) , Q3 ( t ) = Q ( t ) , H3 ( t ) H3 ( t ) h am,av r3
(30)
( )
(31)
( )
i i i i h'1 n ,M m , j
,i {I,II }
(32)
- pumping facilitys electrical power, PeSP = m p PeI + m p PeII - hydraulic power requested by pilot network,
I II
(33) (34)
PhRP =r g QF ( H F H A )
hSP =100 PhRP [%] PeSP
In this case, besides equations from item 3.1. [minus equations (15) and (16) as well as (29) and (30) ], we have to take into account the next equations and conditions: m) Energys equation between sections k=2 and R2 tanks section
am,R H R (t )=H am Q, 3 2 (t ) h r 2 Q (t )
,R Where head loss h am Q ,3 r2 Q (t )
(36)
is given by equation:
R 3 (t ) = h am, Q, Q r2
d 3 3 M am, R Q Q (t ) , pentru Q Q (t ) 0 ;
)2
(37)
183
n) The waves dynamic equation within delivery pipe and the continuity equation for compensation tank R2: - waves dynamic equation
0 L1 2 dQ(t )
g A
*
dt
=H ( ,Q ) z f h1,2 r (Q )h r 2
am,R
3 (QQ (t ))
(38)
(39)
o) Terminal conditions for the integration of equations (38) and (39) : - for tanks filling stage:
0 0 3 0 tu =0,Qu =Q tu
0 0 tu = 0,zu = z min ( )min = H R zf
()
(40)
max ( )max = H R zf
1 1 and tu = Tu ,zu = z
(41)
0 0 3 0 tg =Tu ,Q g = jQ tg
( )
min ( )min = H R zf
(42) (43)
p) The equations for pumping facilitys energies and average efficiency: - power consumed in tanks operational stage ,
EeSP
t1
0 t
f (t )dt PeSP
(44)
where: = u - for filling stage; = g - for draining stage; - power consumed in T cycle,
g u EeSP = EeSP + EeSP
(45)
E hRP = r g QF ( H F H A )T
- pumping facilitys average efficiency,
(46)
184
h SP = 100
E hRP E eSP
[%]
(47)
Air cushions volume, Va , can be assessed in function of the water volume within the vessel, Vw, as it follows: Va = VH Vw
Vw = Vo + V p + Vu
(48)
In the usual cases of horizontal hydrophores (Fig. 2), water volume Vw can be computed as a function of the total volume VH and the depth of water within the vessel, , as it follows[1]:
Vw = Vw ( ) = VH ( R ) VH ( A R + B )
The precise equation of function Vw ( ) is given in [2]:
Vw ( ) = L 2 D D arctg 2 2 + ( 2 D ) ( D )
(49)
(50)
The waters extreme levels within hydrophores tank, that is min and
min max , have to correspond to the extreme loads within tank, that is H R and, max ; these levels depend on characterisic volumes by means of the respectively, H R next equations:
1 min = Vw (Vo + V p )
results:
max
1 = Vw
Vo + V p + Vumax
)
)
(51)
(52)
4. CONCLUSIONS
The above shown mathematical model is useful for the next applications:
185
1. To assess the main energetical and efficiency parameters for the water pumping process, that is EeSP and SP . 2. To assess the control levels for pumps startings and stoppings, that is: min / max . 3. To create a computer program for the digital simulation of pumps functioning. REFERENCES
1. Alexandrescu O., Staii de pompare. Ed. Gh. Asachi Iai, 2003, ISBN 973-621-059-6. 2. Bartha I., Luca M., Popescu t., Popia A. Hidraulica. Culegere de probleme. I.P. "Gh. Asachi ", Iai, 1992. 3. Popescu t. Aplicaii informatice n hidraulica sistemelor hidrotehnice. Editura CERMI, Iai, 1999, ISBN 973-8000-11-4 4. Popescu t., Poiat T. Determinarea caracteristicilor energo-economice echivalente ale unor instalaii de pompare utilate cu agregate de pompare nereglabile. n: Lucrrile Conferinei Naionale de Termotehnic, Ediia a VII-a, Vol.III, Braov,1997, ISBN 973-97758-5-3.
186