Scribd Logo
Carica

Benvenuto in Scribd!

  • 9 26 13 NVB Pacer Designation of Audio Request Stamped in 05104 and 05078 05077

    Caricato da

    NevadaGadfly
    20 visualizzazioni2 pagine
    Dear Ms. Purdy, Please see the attached Order of 8/19/13 granting an eflex waiver in cv11-08196. Please accord the rejected filing the filing date associated with its original submission date. CV11-01955 and CV11-01896 are easily confused, as they both have a caption that consists of "Zach Coughlin v. Washoe Legal Services"...but 01955 adds to other co-defendants (CAAW and TWS (now CIS)). Judge Stiglich's 8/19/13 Order After Hearing seems to contemplate that when a party is granted IFP status (as Coughlin was in 01896 back on 8/9/11...though the RMC refused to accord Coughlin court appointed counsel on 10/26/11 and 12/15/11, despite 01896 being a civil case and the case on appeal/petition in CR11-2064 being a criminal case that ultimately took away Coughlin's law license), they ought automatically be granted an eflex waiver, at least as to that case (though collateral estoppel seems to apply everywhere the state or county ever needs it to). The filing in 01896 is somewhat of a "time is of the essence" quality, though Mr. Garin has failed to respond to my entreaties to seek clarification from WLS's Exec. Director as to just what he meant incident to his expounding upon "black people's brains" back in early 2009. It would be nice to have an opportunity to question WCDA Bruce Hahn about his knowledge of that as well considering Hahn sat on the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board (NNDB) Screening Panel in April 2012 that decided to put Coughlin and his family through this ridiculous, barbaric spectacle, largely based upon a 4/13/09 Order After Trial in DV08-01168 that was vacated by the 6/19/09 Final Decree of Divorce (so 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's vacated 4/13/09 Order After Trial was not only cited by Elcano as the sole reason for Coughlin's firing, but also formed one of the basis for the WCDA's Office's Hahn (whom clearly either knows not what a basis to disqualify himself from such an adjudicatory position would be (much like RJC Judge Hascheff, also a WLS Board of Directors member, whose finding that there was probable cause for the shameful 5/23/13 arrest of Coughlin (incident to RJC Bailiff John Reyes attacking Coughlin and throwing him over a bench) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMU_qWIwZbY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yllvEBtk6C4 Of course, RJC Judge David Clifton ruled during the 9/24/13 status conference in that RCR2013-072675 case that Coughlin would not be afforded court appointed counsel (despite Clifton indicating Coughlin could so avail himself of the Sixth Amendment at the 6/19/13 status conference), and that Coughlin had somehow waived his right to a speedy trial incident to Clifton taking Coughlin's Motion to Proceed IFP/Application for Court Appointed Counsel On The Condition That Coughlin Be Permitted to Appear as Co-Counsel and Retain All Final Decision Making Authority As to Means, Tactics, Objectives and Any Other Matter and running with it sufficient to stick Coughlin was R. Bruce Lindsay as his sole counsel (though such appointment was not even made until, at the very earliest, 6/6/13) and Lindsay allegedly waiving such rights on Coughlin's behalf (despite the fact that Lindsay had already threatened to murder Coughlin, which Coughlin reported to the RJC. Of course, Clifton abused his contempt power some more at the 5/30/13 hearing in 072675 when he made more of hsi threats to have Coughlin gagged with the duct tape the RJC Bailiffs were brandishing upon Coughlin pointing out the flaws in Clifton's scheme to stick Coughlin with Lindsay again (where Lindsay was so instrumental in the RJC's fraudulent "musicial case numbers" approach to denying Coughlin any redress or review of its fraudulent 12/20/12 Administrative Order 2012-01, which Judge Pearson rebranded as a criminal case on 3/6/13 (assigning case number RCR2012-071437, in a display of a former prosecutor turned judge losing his judicial immunity where reverting to the prosecutorial role he formerly occupied as part of the execut

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Formati disponibili

    PDF, TXT o leggi online da Scribd

    Hai trovato utile questo documento?

    Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

    Segnala questo documento
    Dear Ms. Purdy, Please see the attached Order of 8/19/13 granting an eflex waiver in cv11-08196. Please accord the rejected filing the filing date associated with its original submission date. CV11-01955 and CV11-01896 are easily confused, as they both have a caption that consists of "Zach Coughlin v. Washoe Legal Services"...but 01955 adds to other co-defendants (CAAW and TWS (now CIS)). Judge Stiglich's 8/19/13 Order After Hearing seems to contemplate that when a party is granted IFP status (as Coughlin was in 01896 back on 8/9/11...though the RMC refused to accord Coughlin court appointed counsel on 10/26/11 and 12/15/11, despite 01896 being a civil case and the case on appeal/petition in CR11-2064 being a criminal case that ultimately took away Coughlin's law license), they ought automatically be granted an eflex waiver, at least as to that case (though collateral estoppel seems to apply everywhere the state or county ever needs it to). The filing in 01896 is somewhat of a "time is of the essence" quality, though Mr. Garin has failed to respond to my entreaties to seek clarification from WLS's Exec. Director as to just what he meant incident to his expounding upon "black people's brains" back in early 2009. It would be nice to have an opportunity to question WCDA Bruce Hahn about his knowledge of that as well considering Hahn sat on the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board (NNDB) Screening Panel in April 2012 that decided to put Coughlin and his family through this ridiculous, barbaric spectacle, largely based upon a 4/13/09 Order After Trial in DV08-01168 that was vacated by the 6/19/09 Final Decree of Divorce (so 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's vacated 4/13/09 Order After Trial was not only cited by Elcano as the sole reason for Coughlin's firing, but also formed one of the basis for the WCDA's Office's Hahn (whom clearly either knows not what a basis to disqualify himself from such an adjudicatory position would be (much like RJC Judge Hascheff, also a WLS Board of Directors member, whose finding that there was probable cause for the shameful 5/23/13 arrest of Coughlin (incident to RJC Bailiff John Reyes attacking Coughlin and throwing him over a bench) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMU_qWIwZbY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yllvEBtk6C4 Of course, RJC Judge David Clifton ruled during the 9/24/13 status conference in that RCR2013-072675 case that Coughlin would not be afforded court appointed counsel (despite Clifton indicating Coughlin could so avail himself of the Sixth Amendment at the 6/19/13 status conference), and that Coughlin had somehow waived his right to a speedy trial incident to Clifton taking Coughlin's Motion to Proceed IFP/Application for Court Appointed Counsel On The Condition That Coughlin Be Permitted to Appear as Co-Counsel and Retain All Final Decision Making Authority As to Means, Tactics, Objectives and Any Other Matter and running with it sufficient to stick Coughlin was R. Bruce Lindsay as his sole counsel (though such appointment was not even made until, at the very earliest, 6/6/13) and Lindsay allegedly waiving such rights on Coughlin's behalf (despite the fact that Lindsay had already threatened to murder Coughlin, which Coughlin reported to the RJC. Of course, Clifton abused his contempt power some more at the 5/30/13 hearing in 072675 when he made more of hsi threats to have Coughlin gagged with the duct tape the RJC Bailiffs were brandishing upon Coughlin pointing out the flaws in Clifton's scheme to stick Coughlin with Lindsay again (where Lindsay was so instrumental in the RJC's fraudulent "musicial case numbers" approach to denying Coughlin any redress or review of its fraudulent 12/20/12 Administrative Order 2012-01, which Judge Pearson rebranded as a criminal case on 3/6/13 (assigning case number RCR2012-071437, in a display of a former prosecutor turned judge losing his judicial immunity where reverting to the prosecutorial role he formerly occupied as part of the execut

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    20 visualizzazioni2 pagine

    9 26 13 NVB Pacer Designation of Audio Request Stamped in 05104 and 05078 05077

    Caricato da

    NevadaGadfly
    Dear Ms. Purdy, Please see the attached Order of 8/19/13 granting an eflex waiver in cv11-08196. Please accord the rejected filing the filing date associated with its original submission date. CV11-01955 and CV11-01896 are easily confused, as they both have a caption that consists of "Zach Coughlin v. Washoe Legal Services"...but 01955 adds to other co-defendants (CAAW and TWS (now CIS)). Judge Stiglich's 8/19/13 Order After Hearing seems to contemplate that when a party is granted IFP status (as Coughlin was in 01896 back on 8/9/11...though the RMC refused to accord Coughlin court appointed counsel on 10/26/11 and 12/15/11, despite 01896 being a civil case and the case on appeal/petition in CR11-2064 being a criminal case that ultimately took away Coughlin's law license), they ought automatically be granted an eflex waiver, at least as to that case (though collateral estoppel seems to apply everywhere the state or county ever needs it to). The filing in 01896 is somewhat of a "time is of the essence" quality, though Mr. Garin has failed to respond to my entreaties to seek clarification from WLS's Exec. Director as to just what he meant incident to his expounding upon "black people's brains" back in early 2009. It would be nice to have an opportunity to question WCDA Bruce Hahn about his knowledge of that as well considering Hahn sat on the Northern Nevada Disciplinary Board (NNDB) Screening Panel in April 2012 that decided to put Coughlin and his family through this ridiculous, barbaric spectacle, largely based upon a 4/13/09 Order After Trial in DV08-01168 that was vacated by the 6/19/09 Final Decree of Divorce (so 2JDC Judge L. Gardner's vacated 4/13/09 Order After Trial was not only cited by Elcano as the sole reason for Coughlin's firing, but also formed one of the basis for the WCDA's Office's Hahn (whom clearly either knows not what a basis to disqualify himself from such an adjudicatory position would be (much like RJC Judge Hascheff, also a WLS Board of Directors member, whose finding that there was probable cause for the shameful 5/23/13 arrest of Coughlin (incident to RJC Bailiff John Reyes attacking Coughlin and throwing him over a bench) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMU_qWIwZbY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yllvEBtk6C4 Of course, RJC Judge David Clifton ruled during the 9/24/13 status conference in that RCR2013-072675 case that Coughlin would not be afforded court appointed counsel (despite Clifton indicating Coughlin could so avail himself of the Sixth Amendment at the 6/19/13 status conference), and that Coughlin had somehow waived his right to a speedy trial incident to Clifton taking Coughlin's Motion to Proceed IFP/Application for Court Appointed Counsel On The Condition That Coughlin Be Permitted to Appear as Co-Counsel and Retain All Final Decision Making Authority As to Means, Tactics, Objectives and Any Other Matter and running with it sufficient to stick Coughlin was R. Bruce Lindsay as his sole counsel (though such appointment was not even made until, at the very earliest, 6/6/13) and Lindsay allegedly waiving such rights on Coughlin's behalf (despite the fact that Lindsay had already threatened to murder Coughlin, which Coughlin reported to the RJC. Of course, Clifton abused his contempt power some more at the 5/30/13 hearing in 072675 when he made more of hsi threats to have Coughlin gagged with the duct tape the RJC Bailiffs were brandishing upon Coughlin pointing out the flaws in Clifton's scheme to stick Coughlin with Lindsay again (where Lindsay was so instrumental in the RJC's fraudulent "musicial case numbers" approach to denying Coughlin any redress or review of its fraudulent 12/20/12 Administrative Order 2012-01, which Judge Pearson rebranded as a criminal case on 3/6/13 (assigning case number RCR2012-071437, in a display of a former prosecutor turned judge losing his judicial immunity where reverting to the prosecutorial role he formerly occupied as part of the execut

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
    Segnala contenuti inappropriati
    di 2

    Zach Cougblin, Esq.

    (temporarily suspended in Nevada but not suspended before the USPTO)


    1471 E. 9
    th
    St.
    TO:
    Reno, NV 89512
    tele and fax: 949 667 7402
    email: ZacbCoughlin(aJ.hotmail. com
    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
    300 BOOTH STREET
    RENO, NV 89509


    =
    ];>(f)
    z;:;
    ('1)
    ELECTRONIC COURT RECORDING DEPARTMENT
    Fax:(775) 326 2185

    ];> !::
    r'1"'l
    Telephone: (775) 326-2] 03
    Court Recorder for:
    Nevada Bankruptcy Court, Case No. 10-52639:
    ROBERT KELLER
    Nevada Bankruptcy Court, Case No. 1 0-05104:
    ROBERTXELLER- Adversary Proceeding
    Judge GREGG W ZIVE, presiding
    Nevada Bankruptcy Court, Case No. 11-05077:
    JOHN D. GESSIN- Adversary Proceeding
    Nevada Bankruptcy Court, Case No. 11-05078:
    JOHN D. GESSIN- Adversary Proceeding
    Nevada Bankruptcy Court, Case No. NV-ll-51818
    Judge BRUCE T BEESLEY, presiding
    September 5, 2013,
    Dear Court Recorder for Presiding Judge Zive and Presiding Judge Beesley,
    -0 '
    . ......
    (f) ;:r.: rv
    o ;tl
    CJ)
    _c


    -0
    -t t.:?
    ::3
    :-4-<
    <;,-, 0
    ..c
    r c
    rn c:
    0
    ?J?J
    ..c

    Hello, I am writing to respectfully request that tbe audio of the hearings identified herein
    be designated for availability electronically on pacer.gov pursuant to the following:
    http://www.pacer.lloviannoul1cements/generaiiaudi oj'Jl loLhtmI which provides that:
    "Digital audio recordings are now available to the public via internet access to the
    PACER system. In March 2010, the Judicial Conference approved the plan to make digital
    audio recordings available on PACER after a two-year pilot project showed significant public
    interest in accessing these files .. ,.
    The presiding judge determines iUhe audio recording will be posted on PACER.
    Digital audio recording is used in most bankruptcy and many district courts (where magistrate
    judges account for most of the usage).


    :::0

    tJ
    The following courts provide access to audio files tlu'ough the PACER system: ... the
    U.S. Bankruptcy Courts in the ... District of Nevada ... . " (Digital audio recording has been an
    authorized method of making an official record of cOUl1 proceedings since 1999, when it was
    approved by the policy-making Judicial Conference of the United States. )
    For case number NVB-IO-051 04 (Cadle Co. V. Keller) I am requesting that all those
    hearings be designated for availability for audio download hearings on the following days (in
    order of importance): 1217/11 , 311 5112 (please make sure that such includes the portion starting
    at approximately 2:30 pm with opposing counsel O'Rourke, as well as Coughlin's appearance
    before Judge Beesley roughly forty five minutes later (at the conclusion of the stacked 2:30
    p.m. Docket that day), 2114/12, 5/25/ 12, 6/5112, 7/ 17112, 8/28112, 12/4112, and any other
    hearings at any time in the adversary proceeding in NV-l 0-05104 and the Main Bk in NV-l 0-
    52639.
    Please also designate any other hearings in that matter as well as in the Main BK case
    (NVB-l 0-52639), whether Coughlin appeared in such bearings or not.
    Then, for case nUlnbers NVB-ll-05078 (and the appeal thereof in BAP No. 12-1330-
    JuKiD), NVB 11-05077, and Bk. No. NV-1l-51818, I am requesting that the hearing from
    411 1112 and 514/12 be designated for availability for audio download on Pacer.gov as well.
    Please also designate any other hearings in that matter as well as in the Main BK case (Bk. No.
    NV-11-51818) and in the appeal of Adv. No. NV-ll-05078 (BAP No. 12-1 330-JuKiD), whether
    Coughlin appeared in such hearings or not).
    If either presiding judge chooses not to so designate the audio of any of the hearings for
    being digitally available to Coughlin at the greatly reduced cost ($2.40 per hearing) of such
    through w\vw.Pacer.gov, please find attached a Request for a Fee Waiver by Coughlin seeking
    to obtain a CDldisc of the audio of such hearings at no charge in light of Coughlin's indigency,
    especially considering the fact that Coughlin was burglar.i zed by theWashoe County Sheriffs
    Otlice an hour before the 2:30 p.m., hearing of3/ 15/ 12 before Judge Beesley in NVB-IO-
    05104 incident to the WCSO refusing to abide by the requirement in NRS 40.253(5)(a) that a
    tenant have receipt of the summary removal order for "24 hours" prior to any lockout being
    conducted, where the WCSO admits it, unlike every other county in Nevada (in violation of
    NV Canst. Art. 4 Sec. 21 , which makes all laws apply equally to all counties).
    Russell v. Kalian, 414 A.2D 462; Iorio v City of New York, 96 Misc.2D 955. Mayes v.
    UVI Holdings, 723 N.Y.S.2d 151, 280A.D.2d 153 (2001).
    The 8/30112 Sua Sponte Order removing Coughlin as Keller's attorney in either NVB-
    10-05104 or NVB-l 0-52639, or both, does not appear to accurately state what occurred during
    the 8/28112 hearing, and, further, the Motion Coughlin submitted for filing to the NVB on
    8/20/12 should be made part of the record: IIttp:l!www.Scri bd.Com!doc! 165344457i8-20-12-
    0204-62337-051 04-Cou
    o
    hlin-?\'VB-Suhmitted-M )tiOll -to-Withdravv'-That-NVB- ailecl -to-Fi le
    Sincerely, lsi ./
    Zachary B. Co:ti :

    Potrebbero piacerti anche