Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Meredith Sutphin
12/4/07
Children's Literature – Dr. Sturm
Literature Review Paper
Fantasy books seem to be a unique genre; frequently, both children and young adults list fantasy
books among their favorites, across grade-levels and gender lines. 41% of third- through fifth-graders
listed fantasy books as their “most favorite” books in a 1997 study (Boraks, N., Hoffman, A., & Bauer,
D.), while a 1998 study in New Zealand revealed that fantasy books were consistently listed in the top
five favorite genres of both male and female students between the ages of thirteen and fifteen
(Goodyear, C.). The popularity of fantasy books has been capitalized upon by Hollywood in recent
years with new productions of popular titles, including Narnia, The Golden Compass, and the Harry
Potter series, with children, pre-adolescents and young adults as their target audiences. Clearly, fantasy
stories have an engaging quality for many young people in today's culture. And, significantly, fantasy
has a dedicated following of females: a graph of genre preferences of children in grades four through
six shows that almost 80% of females pick up fantasy books as their first choices in reading material
(Todd, K., 1998). When girls open fantasy books, whom do they see to represent themselves in the
worlds they discover, and, perhaps more importantly, what do the worlds and characters they encounter
A look at the traditional stories that could be considered predecessors of modern fantasy
literature shows that women in stories of the fantastical have come a long way. Fairy tales, one of the
earliest forms of fantasy to which children are introduced often emphasize women's surface
characteristics, even though many tales have women as their main characters; titles such as “Sleeping
Beauty,” “Beauty and the Beast,” and “Snow White,” could be said to show girls that outer appearance
is the characteristic for which memorable female characters are named. But children can understand
Sutphin 2
the abstract nature of symbolism; a recorded classroom session analyzed by Charles Temple (1993)
shows that second- and third- graders see beauty as more than a surface characteristic. The students
who discussed a reading of “Beauty and the Beast” clearly articulated that they understood the main
character's beauty as a symbol for her good, kind nature, while the stepsisters' ugliness represented their
ugly personalities (p. 92). However, the goals that these female characters pursue are perhaps more
telling of the limits of “traditional” stories. Susan Lehr (2001) summarizes the fate of many women in
children's literature succinctly: “many traditional books for girls end up with girls turning into women,
defined as leaving family and friends behind, abandoning assertive behaviors, staying indoors, giving
up one's vocation, finding a man, and becoming his wife, which is . . . often historically accurate. This
is also common of “traditional” female heroines in children's fantasy who give up their own sense of
agency once they find their man” (p. 15). It seems obvious that a female main character does not an
empowering heroine make, and the older body of fantasy literature does not seem to provide many
However, many of the newer pieces of fantasy literature for children and young adults provide
models of heroines who are resilient, strong, self-determined, and independent. Some of the notable
examples cited in articles are Cynthia Voigt's Kingdom series, Robin McKinley's The Hero and the
Crown, and Tamora Pierce's Song of the Lioness quartet. The female characters in these books live
lives that provide alternative visions of success for the girls who read about them. These books each
show a heroine “rising above a system that keeps her down – triumphing over it, reversing
expectations” in a way that can be understood as reactionary to the “traditional” fantasy books that
came before (Tolmie, J., 2006, p. 147). Tamora Pierce (1993) herself focuses on the empowering
nature of a convention of fantasy literature, the championing of an underdog, in her article “Fantasy:
Why Kids Read It, Why Kids Need It.” She emphasizes the lure that underdog characters have for
children:
Sutphin 3
In the real world, kids have little say. This is a given; it is the nature of childhood. In
fantasy, however short, fat, unbeautiful, weak, dreamy, or unlearned individuals may be,
they find a realm in which those things are negated by strength. The catch--there is
Two of Pierce's own heroines, Alanna and Kel, struggle to follow their dreams of becoming knights, a
title rooted in one of the most patriarchal systems imaginable, both in the realms of history and fantasy.
The challenges and hardships they face and overcome are difficulties with which modern girls can
empathize through symbol, and though girls have begun to find equal places in classrooms and on
sports fields, mentally seeing a story through another girl's eyes can be a reaffirming experience.
Underdog heroines fit within the conventions of the genre in a way that opens up new avenues to
engage girls in stories that encourage them to dream and reach for their own achievements. These
examples of fantasy literature provide another voice for girls to hear, show them that finding Prince
Charming does not have to be the ultimate goal of a woman's life, whether she lives in America or “a
far-away land.”
However, Alanna, Kel, and other heroines who struggle to overcome the limitations placed
upon them raise questions about the dichotomy between the dreams the lady knights attain and the
system of male power that remains affirmed by those dreams; as Jane Tolmie (2006) asks, “is this a
message that overturns expectations about culture or paradoxically provides a backwards affirmation of
an undesirable general condition?” (p. 151). This question of dichotomy applies to fantasy books set
outside of historically oppressive times in women's history; the popularity of the Harry Potter books
have led some feminist writers to critique J.K. Rowling for not giving women greater equality in her
wizarding world (Thompson, D., 2001, p. 43). The character of Hermione Granger is a particular focus
of critique; by contrasting Hermione's (somewhat slavish) dedication to her studies with Harry and
Ron's easy-going approach to homework, Deborah Thompson points out that the boys do not have to
Sutphin 4
try in order to pass their classes, but Hermione has to scramble to keep up her grades and is portrayed
as a killjoy for doing so (p. 43). E.E. Heilman sees Hermione's position in the trio of main characters
as a subordinate one: “Hermione is primarily an enabler of Harry's and Ron's adventures rather than an
adventurer in her own right” (qtd. in Mayes-Elma, R., 2006, p. 9). Hermione, unlike Alanna, is not
trying to enter a world belonging only to men; however, her presence as an empowering heroine is
called into question by critics who see her as yet another female who tries to shine in a world which is
set up to laud the efforts of men over those of women. Professor McGonagall, one of the other
prominent females in the series, shares the trait of pride in intellect that characterizes Hermione.
Ruthann Mayes-Elma explains in depth how their intelligence limits them in ways that men in
Rowling's books are not limited, and insists that intelligence is not an empowering trait for women in
A rather insidious aspect of patriarchy is of course convincing the oppressed that they do
indeed have some power and control and simultaneously restricting this power so as to
prevent true equality . . . While Hermione and Professor McGonagall do enact their
agency and become empowered through their intelligence, they still are not allowed to
fully transcend male oppression or to critique their own oppression and the institutions
that support it. Rather, they are granted “partial power that serves to support the
For Mayes-Elma, Thompson, and Tolmie, truly empowering literature for girls must break free from
traditional paradigms. Heroines can never be equal to heroes until they are no longer struggling against
systems which do not impair their male counterparts in the same ways.
There is still another trend in children's fantasy literature of books that do tell heroines' stories
outside of patriarchal structures and worlds. Tolmie, writing about heroines in fantasy books set in
medieval worlds, laments the limits in place in stories where women struggle for equality: “it seems the
Sutphin 5
fantasy heroine must be content, for a while yet, to have patriarchy itself as her adventure” (p. 157).
But some fantasy books for children break the molds that have, for so long, seemed to define fantasy
literature. Dierdre Baker (2006) examines these fantasies from a unique angle: geography. Working
from Dianne Wynne Jones' The Tough Guide to Fantasyland, a parody book describing the conventions
of geography in fantasy literature, she examines the ways that popular books in the genre stay within
the boxed-in, one-size-fits-all maps (complete with ominously named mountain ranges, squiggly-lined
rivers, and inherent allegory) (p. 239). Books that break away from this tradition often offer refreshing
female perspectives that are not simply those of women in men's worlds: ingenuity in geography and
the treatment of gender seem, for Baker, to go hand in hand. In particular, she notes the works of
Ursula LeGuin, Dianne Wynn Jones, and Terry Pratchett as examples of books that provide new worlds
For some, the question of whether female fantasy characters must live outside of a patriarchal
paradigm to be truly empowering for readers is answered simply by defining what it means to be a
heroine. Both book characters and children must live in the worlds in which they are born;
empowerment can be derived from the values that steer the female characters in their tales. T. A.
Barron (2001) defines a heroine as a female who lives from her authentic inner self, and he advocates
How can our young women possibly discover the heroes in themselves if they are
continuously told that they are what they buy or wear or look like, rather than what they
do and say and strive to become? How can they come to know how much their choices
matter – indeed, how much they themselves matter – if they are constantly told that
superficial qualities are more important than lasting ones? . . . A hero cares about ideas
and goals and sacred qualities – not the color of her shoes or hair or car. (p. 31)
In this understanding, the title of “heroine” is, in a way, taken from a usage in which it is a title under
Sutphin 6
contention; a heroine does not have to be defined by the world in which she lives or the dreams she
pursues. Instead, a heroine can be any female character who knows her own will and aligns her will
with something good. This definition of a heroine may, perhaps, be the most empowering definition of
all, for no matter what dreams girl readers have or what challenges they face, they, too, can be learn to
Fantasy literature provides a continuum of role models for girls, from the Beauty of fairy tales
who ends her story by settling down with her Beast-turned-Prince to Tiffany Aching of Terry
Pratchett's Wee Free Men, who has her suspicions of the values promoted in The Goode Childe's Book
of Fairie Tales (including the reasoning that “shoe size is a good way of choosing a wife”) (qtd. in
Baker, D, 2006, p. 248). Perhaps it is this full spectrum of heroines that gives fantasy literature such
power for girls rather than any one subtype of character or paradigm within the genre; perhaps the
genre's empowering qualities are rooted in the myriad of possibilities found within.
Sutphin 7
References
Baker, D. F. (2006). What we found on our journey through fantasyland. Children's Literature in
Education, 37(3), 237-251. Retrieved November 7, 2007, from Academic Search Premier
(21937113).
Barron, T. A. (2001). The unquenchable source: finding a heroic girl inside a man. In S. Lehr (Ed.),
Beauty, brains, and brawn: the construction of gender in children's literature. (pp. 30-35).
Boraks, N., Hoffman, A., and Bauer, D. (1997). Children's book preferences: patterns, particulars, and
possible implications. Reading Psychology, 18, 309-41. (From class handout, 10/7/07)
Goodyear, C. (1998). Popularity of various fiction book genres among high school students in
handout, 10/7/07)
Lehr, S. (2001). The hidden curriculum: are we teaching young girls to wait for the prince? In S. Lehr
(Ed.), Beauty, brains, and brawn: the construction of gender in children's literature. (pp. 1-20.)
Mayes-Elma, R. (2006). Females and Harry Potter: not all that empowering. New York: Rowman &
Pierce, T. (1993). Fantasy: why kids read it, why kids need it. School Library Journal, 39(10), 50-51.
Temple, C. (1993). “What if Beauty had been Ugly?”: reading against the grain of gender bias in
Thompson, D. (2001). Deconstructing Harry: casting a critical eye on the witches and wizards of
Hogwarts. In S. Lehr (Ed.), Beauty, brains, and brawn: the construction of gender in children's
Todd, K. (1998). Three researchers report on libraries and youth at ALA conference. Journal of Youth