Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
ATTRIBUTES OF OWNERSHIP Jus - FAPDUV Jus - F Fruendi / Right to the fruits A Abutendi / Right to abuse or consume P Posidendi / Right to possess D Disponendi / Right to dispose U Utendi / Right to use without destroying V Vindicandi / Right to recover The present article only mentions Right to enjoy Right to dispose Right to recover However, the right to enjoy includes FAPU Right to the fruits Right to abuse or consume Right to possess Right to use without destroying the substance RIGHT TO ENJOY -Right to freely enjoy either the property itself or the benefits derived therefrom Right to Use and Abuse Right to Use employing it for the purpose for which it is fit, without destroying it, and which employment can be repeated Right to Abuse the use that extinguishes, consumes, by acts of the owner, things which are consumable. RIGHT TO DISPOSE - The power of the owner to dispose of his property. -Includes Power to alienate the right of the owner to transmit, either by onerous or gratuitous title, his right to another by any act inter vivos or moris causa. e.g., sale, donation Power to limit or encumber the power of the owner to deprive himself of several rights included in ownership and transfer them to another e.g., contracts of lease, commodatum, usufructuary Right to transform the power to change the nature of the thing, or its form or destination Power to destroy the power to render useless or to abandon or annihilate the thing Power to merge
----------------------------------------------OWNERSHIP
-The
mass
or
bundle
of
rights
that
may
be
exercised
over
a
property
-Subject
matter
may
either
be
(material)
things
or
rights
-An
independent
right
of
exclusive
enjoyment
and
control
of
the
thing
for
the
purpose
of
deriving
therefrom
all
advantages
required
by
the
reasonable
needs
of
the
owner
and
the
promotion
of
the
general
welfare
but
subject
to
the
restrictions
imposed
by
law
and
the
right
of
others
(Justice
JBL
Reyes)
-A
real
right
A
power
belonging
to
a
person
over
a
specific
thing
without
a
definite
passive
subject
to
whom
such
right
may
be
personally
enforced
Creates
a
direct
relation
between
the
specific
thing
and
its
holder
Creates
an
obligation
on
the
part
of
third
persons
not
to
interfere
in
such
enjoyment
PROPERTY
-Things
which
are
susceptible
of
appropriation
-The
object
of
ownership
RIGHTS
INCLUDED
IN
OWNERSHIP
EDREED-J-CHA
E-
Enjoy
D-
Dispose
R-
Recover
the
property
from
any
holder
or
possessor
E-
Exclude
any
person
from
enjoyment
and
disposal
of
the
property
E-
Enclose
or
fence
the
land
or
tenement
D-
Demand
indemnity
for
damages
suffered
due
lawful
interference
by
a
third
person
to
avert
an
imminent
danger
J-
Just
compensation
in
case
of
eminent
domain
C-
Construct
any
works
or
make
any
plantations
and
excavations
H-
Hidden
treasure
found
in
the
owners
property
A-
Accessions
ART
428
The
owner
has
the
right
to
enjoy
and
dispose
of
a
thing,
without
other
limitations
than
those
established
by
law.
The
owner
has
also
a
right
of
action
against
the
holder
and
possessor
of
the
thing
in
order
to
recover
it.
RIGHT TO RECOVER Possession essential to both free enjoyment and disposal Jus possidendi Right TO possession; Possession as an incident of ownership or a right included in ownership Jus possessionis Right OF possession; Possession which is a right independent and apart from ownership The owner is entitled to exclusive ownership of his property. However, in the event of unlawful deprivation of possession, the owner is not justified to take the law into his own hands. He is required to resort to proper legal processes to recover his possession over his property. ACTIONS TO RECOVER POSSESSION OF REAL PROPERTY Accion RIP R Reinvidicatoria / Reinvidicacion I Interdictal P Publiciana / Plenaria de posesion a. Accion Reinvidicatoria - An action whereby plaintiff alleges ownership over a parcel of land and seeks recovery of its full possession -Plaintiff seeks to recover the exercise of rights included in ownership -Recovery of possession over property as owner REQUISITES 1) Proof of identity of the land claimed -By describing the location, area and boundaries* *May either be natural or artificial GR: Boundaries prevail over area and location in defining a piece of land. EXPN: If there is a conflict and the boundaries are not sufficiently certain and the identity of the land is not clearly proved by the boundaries, the area should prevail. 2) His title to the land b. Accion Interdictal -Summary action of ejectment -Comprises two distinct causes of action Forcible entry / detentacion Unlawful detainer / desahuico
-Has one-year prescriptive period Based on Art. 555 of the CC Possession de facto is lost if the possession by another person has lasted for more than one year. -The use of summary procedure in ejectment cases is intended to provide an expeditious means of protecting actual possession or right to possession of the property; they are not processes to determine the actual title to an estate Forcible Entry Unlawful Detainer Summary action to recover material or physical possession of real property Person who originally Plaintiff was deprived of held the property possession because the (Plaintiff) was deprived unlawful detainer of possession by force, unlawfully withholds intimidation, threat, possession after the strategy or stealth. expiration or termination of his right thereto under a contract express or implied Possession is void ab Possession was originally initio because he lawful but becomes acquired possession by illegal by reason of the force, intimidation, termination of his right threat, strategy or of possession under his stealth. contract with the plaintiff Plaintiff must allege that Plaintiff need not have he was in prior physical been in prior physical possession of the possession property until deprived thereof One-year prescriptive One-year prescriptive period is counted from period is counted from the date of actual entry the date of last demand EXCEPT when made NOTE: Demand is trough stealth, it will be necessary, which is counted from the time of judicial in nature. the knowledge of such entry c. Accion Publiciana - Plenary action for recovery of possession 1) Action for recovery of the right to possess to determine the better right of possession of realty independent of the title or ownership of the property 2) An ejectment suit filed after the expiration of one year from the accrual of the cause of action or from the unlawful withholding of possession of the realty. Remedy after the prescription period in accion interdictal
Plaintiffs allegation
Court Jurisdiction
Jus Possessionis or Jus Possidendi or real right of ownership itself possession -Possession as -The right of incident or possession attribute of independent of ownership ownership Plaintiff merely Plaintiff alleges alleges proof of a ownership over a better right to parcel of land and posses without seeks recovery of claim of title its full possession If the property is located in Metro Manila Assessed value is n.m.t. 50K MeTC Assessed value is more than 50K RTC If the property is outside Metro Manila Assessed value is n.m.t. 200K MTC Assessed value is more than 200K RTC Accion Publiciana Plenary action for recovery of possession The determination of the better right of possession or possession de jure Accion Interdictal Summary action for ejectment Limited to the question of possession de facto (physical possession) MeTc or MTC.
Court Id. Jurisdiction ART 429 The owner or lawful possessor of a thing has the right to exclude any person from the enjoyment and disposal thereof. For this purpose, he may use such force as may be reasonably necessary to repel or prevent an actual or threatened physical invasion or usurpation of his property. DOCTRINE OF SELF-HELP -The employment of such reasonable force by the owner in defense of his property. -Available to: The owner of the property; or Any of its lawful possessor -Cannot be invoked to recover a property -Can only be exercised at the time of the actual or threatened dispossession
- Repel actual unlawful physical invasion/usurpation - Prevent threatened unlawful physical invasion/usurpation Defense of property is deemed included in self- defense under Art. 11, par. 1 of the RPC Related cases: 1) People v. Goya (1965) -Defense of property, whether complete or incomplete, must be coupled with an attack on the person defending the property 2) People v. Narvaez (1983) -Art. 429 of the CC - Defense of property without any aggression against the person of the owner is authorized. ART 430 Every owner may enclose or fence his land or tenements by means of walls, ditches, live or dead hedges, or by any other means without detriment to servitudes constituted thereon. -An exercise of the owners right to exclude others from the enjoyment of his property. -Must not be attended with bad faith If the purpose was to eject his occupant whose lease has already expired, the owner is liable to said occupant for damages. EASEMENT OR SERVITUDE -A real right constituted in anothers property, corporeal and immovable, by virtue of which the owner of the same has t abstain from doing or to allow somebody else to do something in his property for the benefit of another thing or person.
LIMITATIONS
ON
OWNERSHIP
Ownership
is
not
an
absolute
right.
It
is
subject
to
limitations
such
as:
Restrictions
imposed
by
law
The
exercise
of
the
inherent
powers
of
the
State
Rights
of
others
Limitations
imposed
by
the
owner
himself
INHERENT
POWERS
OF
THE
STATE
1) Police
Power
-General
purpose:
To
secure
the
general
welfare,
comfort
and
convenience
-Property
condemned
is
noxious
or
intended
for
a
noxious
purpose
-Confiscation
is
not
compensable
2) Eminent Domain -Enables the State to forcibly acquire private lands intended for public use and upon payment of just compensation GR: If the owner is willing to sell, no need to expropriate. An ordinary deed of sale may be agreed upon by the parties EXPN: If the owner is unwilling to sell, or cannot accept the price or other conditions offered by the vendee, power of eminent domain will come into play to assert the paramount authority of the State. The welfare of the people is the supreme law. 3) Taxation -Power of the govt to raise revenue in order to support its existence and carry out legitimate objectives -The power to tax includes the power to destroy.
ART
432
The
owner
of
a
thing
has
no
right
to
prohibit
the
interference
of
another
with
the
same,
if
the
interference
is
necessary
to
avert
an
imminent
danger
and
the
threatened
damage,
compared
to
the
damage
arising
to
the
owner
from
the
interference,
is
much
greater.
The
owner
may
demand
from
the
person
benefited
indemnity
for
the
damage
to
him.
STATE
OF
NECESSITY
-Interference
by
a
third
person
with
anothers
property
is
justified
and
cannot
be
prevented
by
the
latter
if
such
interference
is
necessary
to
avert
an
imminent
danger
and
the
threatened
damage
is
much
greater
than
that
of
the
damage
that
the
owner
might
suffer
from
such
interference.
State
of
necessity
is
a
justifying
circumstance;
hence,
the
accused
is
not
criminally
liable.
Civil
liability
is
borne
by
the
person/persons
benefited
by
the
act
of
the
accused.
Requisites:
PNGN
1) Situation
of
grave
peril,
an
actual
or
imminent
danger,
either
upon
the
person
of
the
actor
or
a
third
person
or
their
property;
2) The
interference
is
necessary
to
avert
such
danger
3) The
threatened
damage
is
much
greater
than
that
of
the
damage
that
the
owner
might
suffer
from
such
interference
4) The
state
of
necessity
must
not
be
brought
about
by
the
intentional
provocation
of
the
party
invoking
the
same
Defense against danger State of necessity Danger comes from Anothers property is anothers property used to avert danger not arising from it No obligation to indemnify The owner is entitled to the owner if the latter is indemnity the one responsible for the danger Self-Help State of necessity Who has the Invoked by the Invoked by power to owner or lawful another person invoke? possessor against someone elses property Purpose To prevent other To avert an persons from imminent danger interfering with to himself or to his property another person or to their property The two doctrines cannot be successfully invoked simultaneously. If the application of one doctrine is right, it follows that the other party cannot rightfully invoke the other doctrine.