Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Opponent-process theory – new stimulus events (esp those that arouse strong
+ve or –ve emotions) disrupt the individual’s physiological state of equilibrium. But
this disruption triggers an opposite/opponent process that counteracts the disruption
and eventually restores equilibrium. If the arousing event occurs repeatedly, this
opponent process get stronger and more rapid, eventually suppress the initial
response, creating habituation. Eg. Sky diving, drugs addition.
Behaviourism
Radical behaviourism – a kind of behaviourism describing the learning process in
terms of the relationship b/w a stimulus and response – the S-R approach. It is
sometimes called the black-box as the internal mental process cannot be seen.
Watson’s contribution
• “given the response the stimuli can be predicted, and given the stimuli the
response can be predicted”
• Behaviourism differences among people stem mainly from their varying
experiences, mediated by learning
Cognitive perspective
Watson and Skinner avoided explanation in terms of unseen events in the mind/brain.
Ecological perspective
• Recent research conditioned effects of stimuli paired with some drugs are the
OPPOSITE of the most prominent unconditioned effects of the drugs. Eg.
Morphine reduces sensitivity to pain, but it triggers the direct reflex, in turn,
activates a reflective physiological response that counters the direct effects, ie
increase sensitivities. Eg. Drug overdose when the amount use is actually
normal, besides extinction, the usual drug-taking environment etc can have
an impact to the sensitivity to the drug.
• Operant response – actions a subject operate on the world to produce some
effect. Eg pushing a level, bitten open a bag (for food), saying “please” to get
things done. This is also called instrumental responses because they function
like instruments, or tools.
• Summary of views on CC
o Watson – strict behaviourist, CC is a simple linkage b/w stimuli and
response (S-R)
o Pavlov – association b/w two stimuli is learnt (S-S). CS elicits a mental
representation of UCS which produce CR.
o Experiments favour S-S (Anderson 2000). Eg. Robert Rescorla 1973 –
rat fears light mental re of loud sound freezing
o Cognitive view – Rescorla – bell expectation of food tail wagging,
food begging, salivation, etc. The expectancy theory.
The CS must precede the UCS
The CS must signal heightened probability of occurrence of the
UCS
Conditioning is ineffective when the animal already has a good
predictor.
• Reinforcer – a stimulus event that increases the probability that the response
that immediately preceded it will occur.
o Positive reinforcers strengthen a response if they are experienced after
that response occurs. Eg. Food, smiles, money and other desirable
outcomes.
o Negative reinforcers are the removal of unpleasant stimuli such as
pain, noise, threats.
o Punishment – presentation of an aversive stimulus or the removal of a
pleasant stimulus. This reduces the frequency.
Great deals of learning occur, but only translate to behaviour when a reward is
available.
Albert Bandura and the “Bobo doll” – children not only learnt ways of being
aggressive but also the general message.