Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
http://www.rehabmeasures.org/Lists/RehabMeasures/DispForm.aspx?ID=957
WISCI-II Assesses the amount of physical assistance needed as well as devices required for walking following paralysis that results from Sinal Cord Injury (SCI). Designed to be a more precise measure of improvement in functional limits.
Description
Rank orders the ability of a person to walk after spinal cord injury from most to least severe impairment (Ditunno & Dittuno, 2001).
1 of 6
1/26/2012 10:19 PM
http://www.rehabmeasures.org/Lists/RehabMeasures/DispForm.aspx?ID=957
Level 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Area of Assessment Body Part ICF Domain Domain Assessment Type Length of Test Time to Administer Number of Items Equipment Required Training Required Type of training required
Description Client is unable to stand and/or participate in assisted walking. Ambulates in parallel bars, with braces and physical assistance of two persons, less than 10 meters. Ambulates in parallel bars, with braces and physical assistance of two persons, 10 meters. Ambulates in parallel bars, with braces and physical assistance of one person, 10 meters. Ambulates in parallel bars, no braces and physical assistance of one person, 10 meters. Ambulates in parallel bars, with braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters. Ambulates with walker, with braces and physical assistance of one person, 10 meters. Ambulates with two crutches, with braces and physical assistance of one person, 10 meters. Ambulates with walker, no braces and physical assistance of one person, 10 meters. Ambulates with walker, with braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters. Ambulates with one cane/crutch, with braces and physical assistance of one person, 10 meters. Ambulates with two crutches, no braces and physical assistance of one person, 10 meters. Ambulates with two crutches, with braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters. Ambulates with walker, no braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters. Ambulates with one cane/crutch, no braces and physical assistance of one person, 10 meters. Ambulates with one cane/crutch, with braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters. Ambulates with two crutches, no braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters. Ambulates with no devices, no braces and physical assistance of one person, 10 meters. Ambulates with no devices, with braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters. Ambulates with one cane/crutch, no braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters. Ambulates with no devices, no braces and no physical assistance, 10 meters.
Functional Mobility; Gait Not Applicable Activity Motor Observer 05 Minutes or Less
5 minutes
21 levels
None None
No Training
2 of 6
1/26/2012 10:19 PM
http://www.rehabmeasures.org/Lists/RehabMeasures/DispForm.aspx?ID=957
Free
Available in: Ditunno, P. and J. Dittuno (2001). "Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision." Spinal Cord 39(12): 654-656.
Age Range Administration Mode Diagnosis Populations Tested Standard Error of Measurement (SEM) Minimal Detectable Change (MDC)
Adolescent: 13-17 years; Adult: 18-64 years; Elderly adult: 65+ Paper/Pencil Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury See Burn's et al (2011) SRD data below Chronic SCI: (Burns et al, 2011; n = 63; mean age = 43.3 (13.8) years; mean time since injury = 6.32 (5.99) years) ICC and SRD for WISCI Level and Walking Speed ICC SS WISCI SEM SRD 0.785 0.597 Level 0.994 0.283
Speed 0.930 0.091 0.254 m/s Max WISCI Level 0.995 0.215 Speed 0.971 0.059 0.163 m/s WISCI = Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury SS = Self-Selected Max = Maximum ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient SEM = Standard Error of Measurement SRD = Smallest Real Difference These results suggest that a change of 1 WISCI level can be considered a real difference in a clinical context
Minimally Clinically Important Difference (MCID) Cut-Off Scores Normative Data
Not Established
Not Applicable Acute SCI: (Scivoletto et al, 2004; n = 183 males and 98 females; mean age = 50.4 (19.3) years)
3 of 6
1/26/2012 10:19 PM
http://www.rehabmeasures.org/Lists/RehabMeasures/DispForm.aspx?ID=957
SCI Outcome Data by Sex: Admission Age (years) Lesion to admission time (days) Length of stay (days) Motor scores BI RMI WISCI Discharge Motor scores BI RMI WISCI 67.3 (19.2) 64 (32.7) 6 (4.9) 7.9 (8.2) 65 (22.3) 64.5 (28.8) 6 (4.9) 7.8 (8.5) Females 52 (19.1) 54.1 (43) Males 50.8 (19) 52.6 (39)
103.6 (73.9) 103.4 (79.3) 58.4 (14.3) 56.9 (16.8) 27.8 (21.7) 26.8 (22.6) 1.3 (2.2) 0.6 (2.7) 1.4 (2.8) 1.8 (5.4)
No significant differences between male and female scores BI = Barthel Index RMI = Rivermead Mobility Index WISCI = Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury
Test-retest Reliability Interrater/Intrarater Reliability
Not Established Chronic SCI: (Marino et al, 2010; n = 26; sample included participants from the US and Italy) Excellent Intra-rater reliability (maximum) = 1.0 Excellent Inter-rater reliability = 0.98 WISCI Validation: (Ditunno et al, 2000, 24 raters assessed 40 video clips) Excellent inter-rater reliability (1 perfect agreement)
Not applicable Concurrent Validity - Original WISCI (Ditunno et al, 2000 sample included participants from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Korea, Italy, the UK and US) Excellent WISCI and FIM score correlations (r = 0.765) Acute SCI: (van Hedel et al, 2005; mean age = 54 (20) years; ASIA A = 5%, B = 4%, C = 9% and D = 81%) WISCI II score of 0 to 10 (n = 13 to 20) Poor, WISCI II vs TUG (r = 0.16) Poor, WISCI II vs 10MWT (r = 0.24) Poor, WISCIII vs 6MWT (r = 0.22) WISCI II score of 11 to 20 (n = 47) Adequate, WISCI II vs 10MWT (r = 0.49) Excellent, WISCI II vs TUG (r = 0.65) Excellent, WISCI II vs 6MWT (r = 0.64)
4 of 6
1/26/2012 10:19 PM
http://www.rehabmeasures.org/Lists/RehabMeasures/DispForm.aspx?ID=957
Concurrent Validity: Combined Tetraplegic Combined Tetraplegic Paraplegic Tetraplegic AA WISCI WISCI Level Speed MAX WISCI WISCI Level Speed 0.647** 0.494** 0.663** 0.539** 0.812** 0.715** 0.798** 0.753** 0.704** 0.509** 0.717** 0.572** 0.852** 0.752** 0.816** 0.813** 0.479* 0.104 0.533* 0.149 0.496** 0.491* 0.502** 0.469**
Correlation Strength: > .60 = Excellent .31 to .59 = Adequate < .30 = Poor *p < .05 **p < .0001 WISCI = Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury SS = Self-Selected Max = maximum MMT = manual muscle test LEMS = lower-extremity motor score UEMS = upper-extremity motor score
Content Validity
SCI Measure Review: (Jackson et al, 2006, review of 5 SCI measures; based on 54 votes) Expert ratings: Valid or Useful = 52% Useful but requires validation or changes = 43% Not Useful or valid for research in SCI = 6%
Face Validity
Experts (clinical physician's and physical therapists) at eight international spinal cord injury facilities were asked to rank 20 items. Kendall coefficient of concordance (W) for the pilot data set = 0.843
Burns, A. S., Delparte, J. J., et al. (2011). "The reproducibility and convergent validity of the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) in chronic spinal cord injury." Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25(2): 149-157. Find it on PubMed Dittuno, P. L. and Ditunno, J. F., Jr. (2001). "Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI II): scale revision." Spinal Cord 39(12): 654-656. Find it on PubMed Ditunno, J. F., Jr., Ditunno, P. L., et al. (2000). "Walking index for spinal cord injury (WISCI): an international multicenter validity and reliability study." Spinal Cord 38(4): 234-243. Find it on PubMed Jackson, A. B., Carnel, C. T., et al. (2008). "Outcome measures for gait and ambulation in the spinal cord injury population." J Spinal Cord Med 31(5): 487-499. Find it on PubMed Marino, R. J., Scivoletto, G., et al. (2010). "Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury Version 2 (WISCI-II) with Repeatability of the 10-m Walk Time: Inter-and Intrarater Reliabilities." American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 89(1): 7. Find it on PubMed
5 of 6
1/26/2012 10:19 PM
http://www.rehabmeasures.org/Lists/RehabMeasures/DispForm.aspx?ID=957
Scivoletto, G., Romanelli, A., et al. (2008). "Clinical factors that affect walking level and performance in chronic spinal cord lesion patients." Spine 33(3): 259-264. Find it on PubMed van Hedel, H. J., Wirz, M., et al. (2008). "Standardized assessment of walking capacity after spinal cord injury: the European network approach." Neurol Res 30(1): 61-73. Find it on PubMed
Year published Instrument in PDF Format Summary Author(s) Summary Date External Recommendations Approval Status Attachments Approved
Dittuno-2001-Walking index for sp.pdf
2001 Yes
Created at 2/18/2011 4:50 PM by Jason Raad Last modified at 5/25/2011 2:38 PM by Jennifer Moore
6 of 6
1/26/2012 10:19 PM