Swap Report - Rostock01 - v2 PDF

1 (32)
Cluster Swap Report Rostock 1

Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Enigma 2006
CLUSTER PERFORMANCE REPORT

TOC0506_P1 (Rostock 1)
Hatem Mokhtari (Nokia)
V2.0
18.08.2006
Authority
Name
O2
Nokia
Patricia Rdiger
Hatem Mokhtari
Signature
2 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Table of Contents
1
2
Cluster and Swap Information........................................................................................................ 3

Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 4
2.1
KPI Comparison ...................................................................................................................... 4
2.1.1
PS KPIs ............................................................................................................................ 4
2.1.2
CS KPIs............................................................................................................................ 4
2.2
RF Performance ...................................................................................................................... 5
2.2.1
EcNo Distribution.............................................................................................................. 5
2.2.2
Rscp Distribution .............................................................................................................. 5
3
KPI Details ..................................................................................................................................... 6
3.1.1
Pre DT KPIs ..................................................................................................................... 6
3.1.2
Post DT KPIs.................................................................................................................... 7
4
Plots ............................................................................................................................................... 8
4.1
SC Dominance Plot ................................................................................................................. 9
4.2
RSCP Plots............................................................................................................................ 11
4.3
Ec/Io Plots ............................................................................................................................. 13
4.4
Active Set Size ...................................................................................................................... 15
Appendix .............................................................................................................................................. 17
5
KPI Detailed Analysis................................................................................................................... 17
5.1
PS Calls................................................................................................................................. 17
5.1.1
Issue #1: HTTP Download Failure ................................................................................. 18
5.1.2
Issue#2: PS Call drop..................................................................................................... 20
5.1.3
Issue#3: PS Call drop..................................................................................................... 22
5.1.4
DL throughput reduction................................................................................................. 23
5.2
CS Calls................................................................................................................................. 27
5.2.1
Issue #4: CS Drop .......................................................................................................... 28
Explanation of Data and Plots.............................................................................................................. 31
5.3
Legend................................................................................................................................... 31
6
Applied Offsets............................................................................................................................. 31
7
Test Equipment Details ................................................................................................................ 32
7.1
Equipment List....................................................................................................................... 32
7.2
Call mix.................................................................................................................................. 32
7.2.1
PS-Call: .......................................................................................................................... 32
7.2.2
CS-Call: .......................................................................................................................... 32
3 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
1
CLUSTER AND SWAP INFORMATION
The city of Rostock is subdivided into two clusters. This report refers to the cluster in the centre of
Rostock. The second Rostock cluster includes the northern part of the city including the Baltic Sea
harbour. The O2 network in Rostock is lightly loaded and appears to be in good condition. During the
Pre and Post Drive tests all the sites were operational and no significant network issues were
encountered.
Cluster Name
Drive date
Number of Drives Conducted
Number of Planned Sites
Number of Integrated Sites
Number of OTSR Sites
Number of STSR Sites
Table 1: Cluster Information
Pre-Swap
Post Swap
TOC0506_P1 (Rostock 1)
CS and PS: 22.06.2006
CS and PS: 10.08.2006
1
1
24
24
24
24
24
24
0
0
4 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report summarizes the DT performance of O2 network in Rostock (cluster 1) before
and after the Node B swap. As Rostock is subdivided into two separate clusters, this analysis
concerns only the centre of Rostock since the northern part of Rostock has yet to be swapped.
The Rostock 1 cluster demonstrates that the performance of the Nokia network exceeds that of
the previous equipment. For both CS and PS calls the post swap performance generally exceeds
the pre swap performance. However due to the lack of intervendor Iur and the fact that some of
the drive testing for this cluster was carried out in the vicinity of the cluster border there is some
impact on the performance. This is due to the rf emissions from the sites in the unswapped
cluster being experienced by the users (and drive test UEs) in the swapped cluster and causing
an increased noise environment. This effect will be experienced in all clusters where there are
boundaries between swapped and unswapped clusters. The effect is not severe in this case but
slightly adversely affects the throughput and probably contributes to some dropped calls in the
boundary region. The DL BLER performance is significantly better with the Nokia equipment and
this should provide enhanced voice quality and data throughput performance.
2.1
2.1.1
KPI Comparison
PS KPIs
PS KPIs
Attach Attempts
Attach Failures
Attach Success Rate
Attach Delivery Time <= 10 sec
PDP Context Activation Attempts
PDP Context Activation Failures
PDP Context Activation Success Rate
PDP Context Delivery Time <= 8 sec
HTTP Download Attempts
HTTP Download Failures
HTTP Download Success Rate
HTTP DL Throughput (384 kbps bearer)
PS Call Dropped
Average Active Set Size
Overall PS Session Success Rate
Pre DT
22.06.2006
Post DT
10.08.2006
304
0
100.0%
99.3%
304
0
100%
100%
304
1
99.67%
278.7
2
1.27
99.34%
273
0
100.0%
99.6%
273
0
100.0%
100.0%
273
1
99.63%
271.3
2
1.30
99.27%
Table 2: PS Comparison
2.1.2
CS KPIs
CS KPIs
Call Attempts
Call Setup Failures
Call Drops
Successful Calls
Overall Call Success
Average Downlink BLER
Pre DT
22.06.2006
225
1
0
224
99.56%
1.24
2.27%
Table 3: CS Comparison
Post DT
10.08.2006
212
0
1
211
99.53%
1.27
0.21%
Delta
-1
1
-0.03
0.03
2.07
Delta
0
0
0.3
0
0
0
0
-0.04
-7.4
0
0.03
-0.07
5 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
2.2
2.2.1
RF Performance
EcNo Distribution
Ec/Io Distribution
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
PRE Ec/Io
30.00%
POST Ec/Io
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
-5.0 to -0.1
dB
-9.0 to -5.0 -11.0 to -9.0

dB
dB
-13.0 to 11.0 dB
-15.0 to 13.0 dB
-17.0 to 15.0 dB
-20.0 to 17.0 dB
Ec/Io Ranges (dB)
Plot 1: EcNo distribution
More samples of Ec/Io in the highest range in the POST than in the PRE period !
2.2.2
Rscp Distribution
RSCP Level Distributions
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
PRE RSCP
15.00%
POST RSCP
10.00%
5.00%
0.00%
-60 to +20
-70 to -60
-80 to -70
-90 to -80
-100 to -90
-115 to -100
-130 to -115
RSCP Level Range (dBm)
Plot 2: RSCP distribution
RSCP Values have higher occurrence in the high ranges (dBm) under Nokia
equipment than the previous vendor. The tendency is inverse in the lower ranges.
6 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
3
KPI DETAILS
3.1.1
Pre DT KPIs
Rostock Pre DT
22.06.2006
Cluster Name:
PS KPIs
Attach Attempts
Attach Failures
Attach Success Rate
PS Call Dropped
Table 4: Pre DT PS KPIs
Document 1: Pre DT PS KPIs details
Cluster Name:
Rostock Pre DT
22.06.2006
CS KPIs
Call Attempts
Call Setup Failures
Call Drops
Successful Calls
Result
225
1
0
224
99.48%
1.24
2.27%
Table 5: Pre DT CS KPIs
Document 2: Pre DT CS KPIs details
Result
304
0
100.00%
99.30%
304
0
100%
100%
304
1
99.67%
278.7
2
1.27
99.34%
7 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
3.1.2
Post DT KPIs
Rostock Post DT
Cluster Name:
PS KPIs
Attach Attempts
Attach Failures
Attach Success Rate
PS Call Dropped
Table 6: Post DT PS KPIs
Cluster Name:
Rostock Post DT
CS KPIs
Call Attempts
Call Setup Failures
Call Drops
Successful Calls
Result
Table 7: Post DT CS KPIs
212
0
1
211
99.53%
1.27
0.21%
Result
304
0
100.00%
99.30%
304
0
100%
100%
304
1
99.67%
278.7
2
1.30
99.34%
8 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
4
PLOTS
Plot 3: Cluster Rostock 1
9 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
4.1
SC Dominance Plot
Plot 4: Pre DT SC dominance
10 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Plot 5: Post DT SC dominance
11 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
4.2
RSCP Plots
Plot 6: Pre DT RSCP
12 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Plot 7: Post DT RSCP
13 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
4.3
Ec/Io Plots
Plot 8: Pre DT Ec/Io
14 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Plot 9: Post DT Ec/Io
15 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
4.4
Active Set Size
Plot 10: Pre DT CS Active Set Size
16 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Plot 11: Post DT CS Active Set Size
17 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
APPENDIX
5
5.1
KPI DETAILED ANALYSIS

PS Calls
Cluster Name:
Rostcok Post DT
PS KPIs
Attach Attempts
Attach Failures
Attach Success Rate
HTTP DL Throughput (384 kbps
bearer)
PS Call Dropped
Table 8: Post DT PS KPI summary
Result
304
0
100.00%
99.30%
304
0
100%
100%
304
1
99.67%
278.7
2
1.30
99.34%
Issues
Issue #1
Issue #2, #3
18 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
5.1.1
Issue #1: HTTP Download Failure
A normal Download of the predefined 700kB HTTP file consists of 715616 Bytes. According to TEMS
logfiles (Actix Post-processed) only 712931 Bytes are downloaded. The event is flagged by Transfer
Error. Before the fail occurred we see a RRCConnectionReleaseComplete. The connection is thus
terminated normally, which we can also see in the data below that Ec/Io values are quite acceptable
(blue color). As in region South, we already seen this tool error. We consider this event as void.
Normally if the HTTP Failure occurred in a highly interfered location we could say that this is a typical
radio issue. HTTP Failure can also occur when the UMTS Network area is highly loaded or a drop in
the receive power (diffraction, sudden RF loss, tunnel, etc..), which is not the case here. We can also
see that the subsequent messages are all normal. RRCConnectionRequest then Setup and setup
Complete. This issue will continue to be reported as a fault in future reports and it is expected that
future releases of TEMS may cure this problem.
19 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
20 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
5.1.2
Issue#2: PS Call drop
The figure below clearly shows the rapid degradation of the rf environment. We can see that at the
time and location of the drop the Ec/No is very bad. Here the mobile is very close to the site, which
means that the DL receive power is sufficient but the increase in noise (probably due to the
interference coming from the non-swapped sites in the adjacent cluster) rapidly reduces the Ec/No.
We see also that aggregated BLER has increased to 100% on this location.
Plot 12: PS drop (EcNo)
21 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Plot 13: PS drop (RSCP)
22 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
5.1.3
Issue#3: PS Call drop
The figures below clearly show the degradation of the radio interference environment. This is a
repeat of the problem detailed above.
Plot 14: PS drop (EcNo)
23 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
5.1.4
DL throughput reduction
As discussed previously the DL throughput is affected by the radio conditions. In the Rostock data
there are some PS sessions that appear to be affected by interference due to the missing intervendor
Iur. Although it is occurring in a irregular fashion (due to local clutter and propagation environment)
this example clearly demonstrates the cause (poor Ec/Io) and effect (reduced throughput). Referring
to plot 15, showing the throughput versus the time of call, the reduction of average throughput is clear
to see, particularly around 06:23. Plots 16 and 17 present the throughput and Ec/Io data for this time
and clearly demonstrate the correlation. Although it is not possible to pin point the source of the
interference to the unswapped sites in the north of Rostock, it is clear that this example of reduced
throughput is in the north of the Rostock cluster and in close vicinity to those unswapped sites.
Without detailed clutter and terrain information we can only assume that those areas where the
throughput is reduced have low loss radio paths in the direction of the interfers.
DL Troughput vs Time
400
350
300
200
150
100
50
0
02
:5
03 2:1
:0 2:5
03 2:2 40
:1 3:2
03 1:2 90
:2 7:7
03 2:4 10
:3 9:3
03 2:0 10
:4 0:0
03 3:0 90
:5 4:5
04 8:4 70
:0 5:6
04 7:3 20
:1 1:8
04 6:3 00
:2 0:1
04 5:2 50
:3 6:3
04 4:3 10
:4 6:5
04 4:4 50
:5 1:2
05 5:1 90
:0 6:2
05 9:4 90
:1 4:1
05 8:4 20
:2 8:9
05 7:5 40
:4 6:3
05 4:5 60
:5 1:8
06 3:5 30
:0 7:3
06 3:5 60
:1 6:5
06 3:0 40
:2 2:9
06 3:5 00
:3 4:7
06 3:5 30
:4 1:4
06 5:2 20
:5 1:4
07 4:3 40
:0 8:5
07 5:0 00
:1 9:0
07 4:0 40
:2 6:5
07 7:0 80
:3 0:4
07 6:2 00
:5 8:5
08 0:5 30
:0 2:8
08 1:2 40
:1 0:8
08 1:4 60
:2 2:9
08 0:3 80
:3 8:7
08 0:5 50
:3 4:2
9: 3
48 0
:3
50
kbps
250
Time
Plot 15: DL Throughput (average of session) versus time of call
24 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Plot 16: DL Throughput Degradation in the north of the Rostock 1 cluster close to the river
25 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Plot 16: DL Throughput degradation correlated with Ec/Io (here -17 dB)
26 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Plot 15: PS drop (RSCP)
27 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
5.2
CS Calls
Cluster Name:
CS KPIs
Call Attempts
Call Setup Failures
Call Drops
Successful Calls
Table 9: Post DT CS KPI summary
Rostock Post DT
10.08.2006.
Issues
Result
212
0
1
211
99.53%
1.27
0.21%
Issue #4
28 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
5.2.1
Issue #4: CS Drop

The only CS Drop occurred in very good Ec/No and CPICH Levels as seen on the Actix
Message browser. The drop was flagged as No service by TEMS. We believe that this
is an isolated miscellaneous drop. There is no interference or signal level issue in this
area. The message browser is displayed below. All the rf conditions indicate there
should be no problem to continue to support the call. The active set contains one pilot
coming from the OTSR site 212310035B (SC 330) and the monitored set has two low
level members. The Serving cell Ec/Io has a level of 3dB and RSCP of -79 dBm
Plot 146: CS Drop (RSCP) from Actix Message Browser
29 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Plot 157: CS Drop (EcNo)
30 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
Plot 18: CS Drop (RSCP)
31 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
EXPLANATION OF DATA AND PLOTS
5.3
Legend
SuperStream001-Uu_A ctiveSet_Count (Count)
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
>= 0 to < 1 (0)

>= 1 to < 2 (22038)
>= 2 to < 3 (1453)
>= 3 to < 4 (406)
>= 4 to < 5 (2)
>= 5 to < 6 (0)
>= 6 to < 20 (0)
SuperStream001-Uu_A ctiveSet_EcNo_0 (dB)
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Below -20.0 (43)

>= -20.0 to < -17.0 (106)
>= -17.0 to < -15.0 (131)
>= -15.0 to < -13.0 (196)
>= -13.0 to < -11.0 (280)
>= -11.0 to < -9.0 (510)
>= -9.0 to < -5.0 (3495)
>= -5.0 to < -0.1 (19138)
A bove -0.1 (0)
SuperStream001-Uu_A ctiveSet_CalculatedRSCP_0 (dBm)
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
Below -130.00 (0)

>= -130.00 to < -115.00 (323)
>= -115.00 to < -100.00 (2183)
>= -100.00 to < -90.00 (4156)
>= -90.00 to < -80.00 (7148)
>= -80.00 to < -70.00 (6923)
>= -70.00 to < -60.00 (2589)
>= -60.00 to < 20.00 (577)
A bove 20.00 (0)
APPLIED OFFSETS
No OTSR->STSR Upgrades were done in this cluster, thus no offsets were applied.
32 (32)
Hatem Mokhtari
Issue: V2.0
7
TEST EQUIPMENT DETAILS
This section details the test equipment used for each swap event and includes changes to equipment
between pre and post swap events.
7.1
Equipment List
Equipment Description
Pre-Swap
355677007885912
356657006119918
01150005
PNA411076369
2005100109
AMR UE NOKIA 6630

PS 384 DL UE NOKIA 6630
DTI Scanner
Laptop
USB HUB
Post Swap
355677007885912
356657006119918
01150005
PNA411076369
2005100109
Table 10: Drive Test Equipment Details
7.2
Call mix
Following Call mix was used during data collection.

7.2.1
7.2.2
PS-Call:
Download of HTTP file from a server (http://195.170.99.82/umts/data_700k)
APN (Zugangspunkt):
Einwahlnummer:
Every download has to start with a new RRC Connection Request followed by a new
Attach and PDP Activation.
30 sec idle time.
surfo2
*99#
CS-Call:
Voice Call with a duration of 60 seconds
Telephone Number: 0179 0150015
30 sec idle time.
Table 11: Drive Test Call Mix

Swap Report - Rostock01 - v2 PDF

Caricato da

Informazioni sul documento

Titolo originale

Copyright

Formati disponibili

Condividi questo documento

Condividi o incorpora il documento

Opzioni di condivisione

Hai trovato utile questo documento?

Questo contenuto è inappropriato?

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

Swap Report - Rostock01 - v2 PDF

Caricato da

Copyright:

Formati disponibili

1 (32)

Cluster Swap Report Rostock 1

CLUSTER PERFORMANCE REPORT

Cluster and Swap Information........................................................................................................ 3

CLUSTER AND SWAP INFORMATION

-9.0 to -5.0 -11.0 to -9.0

Ec/Io Ranges (dB)

Plot 1: EcNo distribution

RSCP Level Range (dBm)

Plot 2: RSCP distribution

Document 1: Pre DT PS KPIs details

Table 5: Pre DT CS KPIs

Document 2: Pre DT CS KPIs details

Table 7: Post DT CS KPIs

Plot 3: Cluster Rostock 1

Plot 4: Pre DT SC dominance

Plot 5: Post DT SC dominance

Plot 6: Pre DT RSCP

Plot 7: Post DT RSCP

Plot 8: Pre DT Ec/Io

Plot 9: Post DT Ec/Io

Active Set Size

Plot 10: Pre DT CS Active Set Size

Plot 11: Post DT CS Active Set Size

KPI DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue #1: HTTP Download Failure

Issue#2: PS Call drop

Plot 12: PS drop (EcNo)

Plot 13: PS drop (RSCP)

Issue#3: PS Call drop

Plot 14: PS drop (EcNo)

Plot 15: DL Throughput (average of session) versus time of call

Plot 15: PS drop (RSCP)

Issue #4: CS Drop

Plot 146: CS Drop (RSCP) from Actix Message Browser

Plot 157: CS Drop (EcNo)

Plot 18: CS Drop (RSCP)

SuperStream001-Uu_A ctiveSet_Count (Count)

>= 0 to < 1 (0)

SuperStream001-Uu_A ctiveSet_EcNo_0 (dB)

Below -20.0 (43)

SuperStream001-Uu_A ctiveSet_CalculatedRSCP_0 (dBm)

Below -130.00 (0)

TEST EQUIPMENT DETAILS

AMR UE NOKIA 6630

Table 10: Drive Test Equipment Details

Following Call mix was used during data collection.

Download of HTTP file from a server (http://195.170.99.82/umts/data_700k)

30 sec idle time.

Voice Call with a duration of 60 seconds

Telephone Number: 0179 0150015

30 sec idle time.

Table 11: Drive Test Call Mix

Potrebbero piacerti anche