Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1. Cities are relatively clean 2. Rudimentary truck and dump operations in place 3. Basic tariffs are in place and tariff collection rate typical in comparison 4. Selective recycling informally practiced
60E
65E
70E
U ZB E K I S TA N
P O P U LATIO N
Count r y capi t al Pr ovi nce capi t al Ot her ci t y Pr ovi nce bor der
45 N
Aral Sea
Be l e u l i Kabanbay Komosomolsk-na-Ustyurte Uch sa y Urg a Ka za kh d a rya Kungrad Leninabad Sa ya t Da u ka ra Ci m b o y Kh a l ka b a d Kh o d zh e l yl i Ta h i a t o s M u yn a k
100 km 100 mi
U Z B E K I S T A N
Ku l ku d u k Mingbulak
Nukus
40 N
TURKMENI
Mangit Ucku d u k Da sh kh o vu z M u l l a l yku d u k Gu rl a n Be sh b u l a k Ta m d y b u l a k So vo t Novo-Urgench Bu za u b a y Ga zl ke n t Tu r t k u l Sh a rykt y Z ra f so n He va TASHKENT Ku l a t a u Ya n i y u l M e sh e kl i A n g r e n Namanghan Uzu n ku d u k Ay a k k u d u k Dru zh b a Pop Ch e n g e l d y Andijon Tuprakkala Ka l a t a Ci n o z Pskent Ohangaron Ku sa yku d u k Qu q o n Dzh a n g e l d y Shuruk Ga g a ri n Z u l u m sa ry Riston Kyzyl ra b a t Gulistan Ko kch a Uzu n ku d u k Be sa ri k Ferghana Nu ro t a Gu g u rt l i Ya n i y e r Dzh u sh Navoi Gi j d u vo n Ga zl i Ka t t a ku rg o n Jizzakh Ya n g i b a z a r Okt o s Bukhoro Bu l u n g u r Ko ra ku l Samarqand STAN Ka ra u l b a za Urg u t M u b o ra k Ki t o b
KYRGYZSTA N
Qarshi
Ya k k a b o g Gu zr Sh u rg u za r De n a u Bo ysu n Pa sh kh u rd Su rci
TA J I K I S TA N
DUSHANBE
ASHGABAT
Dekhkanabad
Serobod Ca rku rg o n Gi l ya m b o r
IRAN
Termiz
AFGHANISTAN
Copyright 2007 by W orld Trade Press. All Rights Reserved.
KAZAKHSTAN
60E
65E
70E
U ZB E K I S TA N
P O P U LATIO N
Count r y capi t al Pr ovi nce capi t al Ot her ci t y Pr ovi nce bor der
45 N
Aral Sea
Be l e u l i Kabanbay Komosomolsk-na-Ustyurte Uch sa y Urg a Ka za kh d a rya Kungrad Leninabad Sa ya t Da u ka ra Ci m b o y Kh a l ka b a d Kh o d zh e l yl i Ta h i a t o s M u yn a k
100 km 100 mi
U Z B E K I S T A N
Ku l ku d u k Mingbulak
Nukus
40 N
TURKMENI
Mangit Ucku d u k Da sh kh o vu z M u l l a l yku d u k Gu rl a n Be sh b u l a k Ta m d y b u l a k So vo t Novo-Urgench Bu za u b a y Ga zl ke n t Tu r t k u l Sh a rykt y Z ra f so n He va TASHKENT Ku l a t a u Ya n i y u l M e sh e kl i A n g r e n Namanghan Uzu n ku d u k Ay a k k u d u k Dru zh b a Pop Ch e n g e l d y Andijon Tuprakkala Ka l a t a Ci n o z Pskent Ohangaron Ku sa yku d u k Qu q o n Dzh a n g e l d y Shuruk Ga g a ri n Z u l u m sa ry Riston Kyzyl ra b a t Gulistan Ko kch a Uzu n ku d u k Be sa ri k Ferghana Nu ro t a Gu g u rt l i Ya n i y e r Dzh u sh Navoi Gi j d u vo n Ga zl i Ka t t a ku rg o n Jizzakh Ya n g i b a z a r Okt o s Bukhoro Bu l u n g u r Ko ra ku l Samarqand STAN Ka ra u l b a za Urg u t M u b o ra k Ki t o b
KYRGYZSTA N
Qarshi
Ya k k a b o g Gu zr Sh u rg u za r De n a u Bo ysu n Pa sh kh u rd Su rci
TA J I K I S TA N
DUSHANBE
ASHGABAT
Dekhkanabad
Serobod Ca rku rg o n Gi l ya m b o r
IRAN
Termiz
AFGHANISTAN
Copyright 2007 by W orld Trade Press. All Rights Reserved.
KAZAKHSTAN
Uzbekistan
Tashkent
Waste collection point improvement; collection fleet; transfer stations; waste container; waste management center with sanitary landfill as main facility; administrative support infrastructure Waste collection points; collection fleet; transfer stations; waste container; special rail wagons; locomotive engines; waste management center with sanitary landfill as main facility; administrative support infrastructure
Waste collection point; collection fleet; transfer stations; waste container; special rail wagons; locomotive engines; waste management center with sanitary landfill as main facility; administrative support infrastructure
TOTAL
PPTA Activities
Technical
Community collection point survey International fact finding mission (Germany) Waste characterization assessment Recycling sector analysis Waste collection and transfer system analysis Disposal facility siting assessment Concept designs and cost estimates Cost benefit analysis (disposal options)
Environmental
Regulatory framework review Rapid environmental assessment Landfill siting assessment IEE
Economic/Financial
Financial management assessment Socioeconomic survey Financial analysis Economic analysis
Procurement
Initial procurement assessment Procurement package preparation
Institutional
National and provincial agency reviews Tashkent City institutional assessment Maxsustrans operations review
Capital Expenditures
Transfer station rehabilitation Landfill machinery Subtotal (same for both options) Landfill facility Railway sidings Tashkent Railway spur-line & siding Hovos Transfer vehicles & containers Gantry crane Hovos Railway wagons Subtotal (different across options)
Total
38,306
56,922
10
Operating Costs
Fixed OPEX1 Variable OPEX2 Total OPEX Transport Costs Mode Distance km (round trip) Transport cost (US$ per ton)
Notes: 1. Average fixed OPEX made up of O&M costs for civil works and staff over 25 years. 2. Average variable OPEX includes landfill machinery and transport costs. 3. Rail transport cost based on Uzbekistan Railways indicative rate.
11
Criteria
Financial Capital cost (Initial) Waste transfer system and landfill
Irrigated land
Undeveloped land
Restrictions unlikely
12
Criteria
Environmental Waste Transfer: Vehicle emissions Road safety Road deterioration and congestion Waste Disposal: Conversion of irrigated land Operational beyond 2060 Social Involuntary resettlement Disposal site social impacts
Confirmed Unlikely
Confirmed Low
Unlikely Negligible
High
High
13
Structuring modalities
Immediate stand alone project System 1 (Phase A): Tashkent City upgrade of equipment and logistics Implementation of intl. standard sanitary landfill MFF (now or future) System 1 (Phase B) : Tashkent Samarkand corridor System 2: Fergana Valley System 3: Bukhara Quarzih Termiz System 4: Nukus Urgench
14
15
Collection Points
Collection System
Transfer Stations
Disposal
Transfer System
16
EA:
Technical Components:
19
20
ADB Financing Percentage and Basis for Withdrawal from the Loan Account 100% of total expenditure claimed* 100% of total expenditure claimed* 100% of total expenditure claimed* 100% of total expenditure claimed* 100% of total expenditure claimed* 100% of total expenditure claimed* 100% of total expenditure claimed*
Category 31,477,000
Subcategory
17,831,000 5,700,000 5,400,000 2,546,000 23,455,500 1,858,500 13,642,000 7,955,000 4,407,200 2,236,700 2,170,500 1,501,000 8,159,300 69,000,000
4
5
PMU, Capacity Development & Studies Project Management Personnel & a Support Consultants, Capacity Support and b Audit Interest and Commitment Charges Unallocated
Total
100% of total expenditure claimed* 100% of total expenditure claimed* 100% of amounts due
*Exclusive
21
SAFEGUARDS SUMMARY
Environmental: Sanitary landfill Classified as Category B project IEE; environmental impacts not significant Project results in improved environmental conditions 1 affected household (AH), cultivated fields 9 workers (seasonal workers) Classified as Category B project Community irrigation association (basic infrastructure) 80-100 informal (illegal) waste pickers Indigenous people not identified Classified as Category C project Social impacts on surrounding communities expected to be negligible due to expected improvement of existing facilities Important role of women at the household in source recycling Women operating waste collection points Female waste pickers
22
Resettlement:
IP/Social :
Gender:
23
Project covenants: Operating ratio - expenditure over revenue (O&M, debt servicing, taxes, and reasonable return on equity) Borrower will provide temporary funding if ratios not met Tariffs reviewed at least annually, and adjusted accordingly Maxsustrans to prepare an annual business plan, for approval by EA
25