APPENDIX OF LAW CITATIONS

1.

(31 CFR 1.32) - Use and disclosure of social security numbers. (a) In general. An individual shall not be denied any right, benefit, or privilege provided by law by a component because of such individual's refusal to disclose his social security number. Act of March 2, 1807, 2 Stat. 426; Current through Pub. L. 113-13: An Act to prohibit the importation of Slaves into any port or place within the jurisdiction of the United States, from and after the first day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and eight. Section 101. (a) As used in this Act- *** (14) The term ''foreign state'' includes outlying possessions of a foreign state, but self-governing dominions or territories under mandate [Amexem] or trusteeship [Sheiks] shall be regarded as separate foreign states. *** (15)(G)(i) a designated principal resident representative of a foreign government [Moorish Divine Movement via AlMoroccan Empire] recognized de jure by the United States, *** accredited resident members [Sheiks] or the staff of such representatives [ELs/BEYs], and members of his or their immediate family; *** (iii) an alien able to qualify under (i) *** above except for the fact that *** the government of which he is an accredited representative is not a member of such international organization, *** 22 USC 613 - Exemptions *** (e) Religious, scholastic, or scientific pursuits: Any person engaging or agreeing to engage only in activities in furtherance of bona fide religious, scholastic, academic, or scientific pursuits or of the fine arts; (f) Defense of foreign government vital to United States defense: Any person*** whose foreign principal is a government of a foreign country the defense of which the President deems vital to the defense of the United States while, (1) such person or employee engages only in activities which are in furtherance of the policies, public interest, or national defense both of such government and of the Government of the United States, and are not intended to conflict with any of the domestic or foreign policies of the Government of the United States, (2) each communication or expression by such person or employee which he intends to, or has reason to believe will, be published, disseminated, *** within the United States, is a part of such activities and is believed *** to be truthful and *** the identity of such person as an agent of such foreign principal is disclosed therein, and (3) such government of a foreign country furnishes to the Secretary of State *** such information as to the identity and activities of such person or employee at such times as the Attorney General may require. ***

2.

3.

4.

5.

22 USC 611 - Definitions As used in and for the purposes of this subchapter (a) The term person includes an individual [any EL/ BEY/ SHEIK/ ADEPT], ***, corporation [MSTA], ***, or any other combination of individuals; (b) The term foreign principal includes (1) a government of a foreign country [Moorish Empire via the Moorish Divine Movement] and a foreign political party [MSTA]; *** (c) *** The term agent of a foreign principal means (1) *** any person [MSTA or any EL/ BEY/ SHEIK/ ADEPT] who acts in any *** capacity at the order, request, or under the direction or control, of a foreign principal [Moorish Divine Movement] *** whose activities are *** indirectly supervised, *** by a foreign principal [AlMoroccan Empire by the decree of Allah], and who *** through any other person [MSTA or any EL/BEY/SHEIK/ADEPT] (2) *** agrees, consents, assumes or *** holds himself out to be, whether or not pursuant to contractual relationship, an agent of a foreign principal as defined in clause (1) of this subsection.

6.

(Commonwealth v. Hall 3 Pick 262 (1825) -- [A] middle name is essential to a persons legal identity and must be stated in full or, later, represented by its initial. For example, early courts held that Thomas Hopkins Perkins could not be indicted as Thomas Perkins, because the indictment must give the defendant his right christian name, and that because Charles is a different christian name from Charles Jones, enrollment of Charles Hall in the state militia did not obligate Charles Jones Hall to report for duty. Later courts ruled that An allegation of sale to George E. Allen is not sustained by proof of a sale to George Allen without any evidence that it is the same person; that a variance between the name stated in a complaint, Nathan Hoard, and as proved at trial, Nathan S. Hoard, was fatal to the action; and that a bank acted lawfully in paying to Sarah F. Sisson funds she had deposited in the bank, even though it had been served a summons of garnishment against Sarah Sisson. In all of these cases, the courts held that a christian name comprised of one forename was a different christian name from one comprised of two forenames, and the different christian names must designate different persons North Carolina General Statutes 75-60 Title [N.C.G.S. 75-60.] This Article shall be known and may be cited as the "Identity Theft Protection Act". (2005-414, s. 1.) The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C.A. 552a) is a federal law that places restrictions on the federal government's collection, use, and dissemination of personal information. As with most comprehensive federal statutes, the act provides general and specific exemptions as well as an administrative appeals process. The Judiciary Act of 1789, 1 Stat. 73, Section(s) 13, 25; see Public Law 73-1, 48 STAT 1: SEC. 13.: ..And be it further enacted, That the Supreme Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies of a civil nature, where a state is a party, except between a state and its citizens; and except also between a state and citizens of other states, or aliens, in which latter case it shall have original but not exclusive jurisdiction. And shall have exclusively all such jurisdiction of suits or proceedings against ambassadors, or other public ministers, or their domestics, or domestic servants, as a court of law can have or exercise consistently with the law of nations; and original, but not exclusive jurisdiction of all suits brought by ambassadors, or other public ministers, or in which a consul, or vice consul, shall be a party. And the trial of issues in fact in the Supreme Court, in all actions at law against citizens of the United States, shall be by jury. The Supreme Court shall also have appellate jurisdiction from the circuit courts and courts of the several states, in the cases herein after specially provided for; and shall have power to issue writs of prohibition to the district courts, when proceeding as courts of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, and writs of mandamus, in cases warranted by the principles and usages of law, to any courts appointed, or persons holding office, under the authority of the United States.. SEC. 25.: ..And be it further enacted, That a final judgment or decree in any suit, in the highest court of law or equity of a State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty or statute of, or an authority exercised under the United States, and the decision is against their validity; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the constitution, treaties or laws of the United States, and the decision is in favour of such their validity, or where is drawn in question the construction of any clause of the constitution, or of a treaty, or statute of, or commission held under the United States, and the decision is against the title, right, privilege or exemption specially set up or claimed by either party, under such clause of the said Constitution, treaty, statute or commission, may be re-examined and reversed or affirmed in the Supreme Court of the United States upon a writ of error, the citation being signed by the chief justice, or judge or chancellor of the court rendering or passing the judgment or decree complained of, or by a justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, in the same manner and under the same regulations, and the writ shall have the same effect, as if the judgment or decree complained of had been rendered or passed in a circuit court, and the proceeding upon the reversal shall also be the same, except that the Supreme Court, instead of

7.

8.

9.

remanding the cause for a final decision as before provided, may at their discretion, if the cause shall have been once remanded before, proceed to a final decision of the same, and award execution. But no other error shall be assigned or regarded as a ground of reversal in any such case as aforesaid, than such as appears on the face of the record, and immediately respects the before mentioned questions of validity or construction of the said constitution, treaties, statutes, commissions, or authorities in dispute.