Sei sulla pagina 1di 2

Contributed February 20, 2001 by Ian Pratley (ian.pratley@cis.co.

uk )
Audit Title: Data Warehouse (consider in conjunction with MI BRAM)
Prepared by: Ian Pratley Date: WP Ref:

Audit Ref:
Reviewed by: Date:

Gross risk Controls Net Risk Net Risk


Possible Controls to Mitigate Test
Business Objectives Key Risks Impact Causes of Risk Audit Tests Effective? Impact Likelihood Recommendation Commentary
(V,H,M,L) Risk ref. (Y/N) (V,H,M,L) (V,H,M,L)

Sufficient information to meet xref MI BRAM


organisations MI requirements.
Information utilised. Data and information within Poor design methodology of data Standard documented design
warehouse and/or marts cannot be warehouse and/or marts methodology adopted, for example
understood. approach towards normalisation

Lack of understanding in design Training given to designers of the


methodology data warehouse and/or data mart.
Poor documentation. Accurate and up to date
documentation of data models
- should use automated
documentation tools
Meaningful documentation of data
definitions and data descriptions
Out of date documentation Procedures for maintenance of
documentation in line with changes
to the source systems
Response times too great Consideration given to replication
of data marts.
Excessive use of data warehouse
rather than data marts for running
queries
Poor design methodology of data xref above, but consideration given
marts to indexes, aggregation, de-
normalisaton
Performance not monitored
Lack of understanding in running Training issue - xref MI BRAM
queries and creating reports
Enquiry equipment in use not xref MI BRAM
effective
Insufficient enquiry equipment in xref MI BRAM
use
Accurate, consistent and up to date Data within the source systems is Inaccuracies, omissions and Extractions/transforms designed to
data. in error inconsistencies in the source data report errors within source data
not identified during the where this is practicable.
extract/transform process
Errors identified during the Aged reports of outstanding errors
extract/transform process not
corrected within the source systems

Responsibilities allocated for


correcting errors within source
systems.
Agreed approach for treatment of
errors reported, with regard to the
action to be taken for the specific
extract/transform run
Risks relating to transfer of
information from source systems:
time dependencies of transactions,
incomplete or corrupted transfers

Data structure changes within Specific consideration of impact on


source systems not reflected within data warehouse/marts within
data warehouse/data marts source system change control
procedures
Source system changes reflected
in data warehouse and data mart
documentation
xref above
Source system changes tested
through to data warehouse

06/23/2009 Page 1
Errors arise in the data within the Database integrity checks such as
data warehouse and/or data marts referential integrity, and data model
integrity checks such as
reconciliation of aggregates.
Unauthorised update of data Controls over data edits
warehouse and/or data mart
Information can be extended, for Design methodology does not Discuss approach adopted for the
example to include additional facilitate future additions to the addition of new areas
products data warehouse and/or data mart
Poor design methodology of data xref above
warehouse and/or marts
Poor or out of date documentation xref above

Capacity of data warehouse Poor design methodology of data Use of data normalisaton to
exceeded warehouse minimise data redundancy.
Capacity of data warehouse not
monitored
Ongoing availability of the Capacity of data warehouse xref above
information. exceeded
Data warehouse and/or marts Could indicate need for replication
unreliable
Reliability of data warehouse and
marts not monitored

06/23/2009 Page 2

Potrebbero piacerti anche