'lryE.

,o'
N R , N 5 -N I E

R E XR E S E A R C H P O B O X1 9 2 s 0
JEAN NV 89019 USA

I'tLE:

N t EPER , l{^\,

Ehi.lJ,n3Crc*vl{7 T[.ory
ii ririeo-wiirr ii,'i'";nioionur 3ytfgrs Field" that penetrates th e rargemasses o i t h e u n l v e r s e a n d i s subsequentry . reradiated as ',Radions,,f ne difference-beiweenemltted radions and absorbec r a d i o n sr e s u l t s i n . g r a v i t a t i o n a l a c c e r e r a t i o n i n t h e d i r e c t i o n of l ge r g r : . . T h es r a v i t a t i o n a t ' a c c e i e i ; i i ; ; ; ; - ; ; ; p o r t r o n a r t o t h e p ' v u u L L n r D r o d u c t t lh b o d y ' sd i a m e t e a r ndits average d e n s i t y . . 6A . t i i i e i . . r s ; :
N I E ' E R ,D r . H a n s : E N E R G ' _ S H I E L NV GI T GD RIA Ey F F E C_ T_ S- R e v i e w s the .backgroun . r d ' e r . i g y s h i e l d i n g ^ e x p l a i n s t h e t h e o y a s ; i t n i t r e rates to g r a v i t a t i o n a l e f f e c t s , u n 9 s u p p o r t st h i s s e v e r a l e x a m p l e sT . he concrusion of several

i! tnat ipii.

THEOR YF E N T R G O Y S H I E L D I NA G SA CAUSE G R A V I T A T I O HE AF LF E C T S H a n sA . N i e p e r , t i . D .

D r . N i e p e r r e v i e w s t h e b d c k g r o u n d ,e x p l a i n s t h e t h e o r y o f energy shielding as It relates to gravitational effects, and supports this theory with several

e xa m o )es. 5everal authors (Nieper, llagyari, Stanyukovlch, and Schneiderov) have

drawn similar conclusions concerning the mechanism of hi-ohenergy gravrtational effects. The assunption is that all space is filled by highly energetic electro-

magnetic radiation called the "radional f ield.,, this ( radional field

Nieper and others believe that

p e n e t r a t e s t h e l a r g e m a s s e so f t h e u n i v e r s e and that there is T h e d i f f e r e n c e b e t w e e ne m i t t e d r a d i o n s a n d accereration in the direction of the

a s u b s e q u e n te n i s s i o n o f r a d i o n s absorbedradions results mas s. The shielding theory tells

in gravitationar

us that the gravitational

acceleration is Dro_ These which

portional to the product of the body's diameter and its average density. two factors thus determine the penetrating abil ity of the radional figld in turn determines the extent of gravitat ional effects. are caused by differences

B e c a u s et h e s e e f f e c t s

in absorbed and emitted energy, temperature rises are E x a m p l e su s e d t o s u p p o r t t h i s

expected proportional to shielding abilities. theory are the core ternperatures of JUD i ter.

the moon and earth and the energy emission of

T w o p o s s i b il i t i e s f I

are presented: (l)

t h a t s i m i l a r m e c h a n i s mm s aybe

o p e r a b l e f o r g r a v i t a t i o n a l , m a g n c t i c , e l e c t r o m a g n e t i c ,a n d r a d i e s t h e t i c acceleration; and (2) that gravitat;onal acceleration for a body may not be

constant but may be changingas the density of the radional f ield changes, The secondpossibility could explain the anatonyof saurian creatures and earthquakes,and

provide an explanation for changesin volcanic activity, continental drifts.

,,r,4&l
I
DR. HANS A. NIEPER 2l, Sedanstrasse 3000 Hannover

Dear Dr.

Cray, understandable extract out of the gravity papers. the high energy

You rnade a well

The point is that gravitational energies have to be sought in range and not in the low one (as Einstein had anticipated).

The results corning in from Venus probe research al1 indicate the rikelihood of Ey theory, including the concept of the 'perisolar cushion field' nhich you should perhaps also make subject of exrracting. one correction: rhe 'radional' field not say too much. I do not use it. is a nomination by shneiderov vbich does

I assume that the gravity field belongs as it pentrates mass, undergoes 'elastic Dr. Ilead adapted this expression).

to the Feinberg Tachion Energy rfiich, (Feinberg wrote io, also relations,

It r.'as Dr. stuhlinger, space physicist with l.lernher von Braun, who connected the Feinberg Theory to rny shielding theory of gravity, This entire aspect of gravity and grav, conversion research now becomes extrenely drarnatic, as a possible po\rer source and as high speed propulsion

(uFo's).

Lt

(J
Theory oJ Enerqg Shieldinq As a Cause of

Gravitational

Et fect s

H a n s N i e p e r , M .D . (Translation)

Boden-Ilensch, No. L4, I972

The law of century

gravitation

enuncibted by Isaac Newton in in the general theory of

the ITth relativity

and by' Albert spite of

Einstein its so far

in 1917, in gives

not seriously

disputed validity, the arising placed

no information

about the actual- mechanism of Also of the experiments,

of gravitational in the foreground definitive

forces. today,

often

Joseph vJeber (1) do not illuminate

this

question,

but demonstrates at best a minirnal forces although gravitational the very bigh energy

inhomogeneity of gravitationaf effects, ran9e. According far to our research, as such, doubtless

belong in

only

a very

few scientists

have so

given serious thought to a hypothetjcat effects and criticize the practical with

m e c h a n i s mo f g r a v i deficiencies of

tationaf

the existing

larv, occasionally crises of

a side glance at research.

the deep-

seated structural

theoretical

Such authors

are A. Maqvari (2), Anatol J. Shneiderov

K. P. Stanvukovich (3) and the group of (4). Independently of these authors, 1953 and published set forth here.

rr"ieper has put a forerunner IlSfglr

forward in

similar 1954 of with

ideas since tlre theory his critical

already

has created

a stir

comments on "l!ylrr: the aid of on

td

Itova"as weLl as by his thL' Budapest radio

gravitation

experiment with antenna during

tower and its

the eclipse

Felrruar)' 15, l96f'

result Maqvari comes thereby to the is

that

the or

acceleration

of

gravity

a consequende of a pressure effect t h e m e c h a n i s r no f The lecture gravitation is

an interceptive

and that momentunt in character".

.,,is power absorptive particularlY

of ucavari

Pertinent' an attraction of masses or an "earth attraction"

The assumption of

has been rejected.also Shneiderov in

as improbable for

a long time by Nieper ' this above aIl gravitational by lies

and 9!3nlu!evigh' that

The reason for

the reflection v,tith the

the outward spreading of tight makes probable

forces

speed of

a cohesivenesa their

means of in

electromagnetic

waves which can inpart

energy only forcan

the form of

an impulse momentum. In any case' excLuded by this' For that

attracting

ces are completely

(

reason there

also be no attracLion All of

of masses and no earth attraction' authors assume that space is filled by

tf

the aforementionecl

an ellergy fie1d, directions Schneiderov Nieper and in

the electromagnetic alt directions

waves of which go from all energetic' about I0-37' this liowever'

and are extremely of

hyPothetically

assumes a ltave Iength frequency' Schneiderov

a somewhat smaller (radional field)

thinks

radiation reflection dence,

cannot penetrate

Iarge nasses'

emission of

"radions",

which nay be smaller

than incj'-

creates

an irnpulse deficit each other'

between the masses whereby they Schneiderov already draws a rnental forces' and

accel-erate conneclion In contrast

towards

betvreen electrostatic, to schneiderov, (1962) believe

magnetic and gravitational Ilaqvari of (I959),

Ni-ePer (I954), that

Stanvukovich field" but

the radiation the tnasses of

the "radional

penetrates

the body, also

the universe'

loses energy thereby. penetration is

The radional smaller

energy which leaves a from outside' whereby

bocly after

than that

-2-

argument for
( )

the thcor-y of encrgy shielding effects (shielding theorv),

as a cause of as it was set forth

gravitational above. The theory of gravity of

energy shielding

would imply that

the acceleration to its

on tbe surface of

a body be proportional This ratio

diarneter times its

average density.

in the earth-

moon case amounts to about 6:l d.476 x 10"m.3.342 as a first the surface shielding with it
A ?

(1.275:. x 107m . 5.5I x 1031 : This value correspondsin fact acceleration Further, orr the connected in-

x I0').

approximation of

to a gravitational I/6 g

the moon of and the

(162.5 mgal).

theory

interceptive all

energy absorption in their

would require

that

masses experience their turn

teriors

a temperature rise diameters

indeed in

in proportion In spite in which of

'J

to

their

times their in

average densities. undertaking

the disappointments deeper drilling have been carried noon also that exhibits into

the Apol1o XIII

the moon with it is

temperarure measurement should now that the

out,

adequately established temperature zone is to in

an elevated the molten

the interior at a

and

the boundary of

be expected of

depth of

about 2 x 105 n below the surface

the moon.

This

was concluded by OrKeefe among others of drift peculiarities (14) of

(8) from observations por the earth:

the rnascons.

bourrdary of Of particufar Wildey that

the molten zone about 2.5 x l-04 below surface. interest, bowever, are the studies of Trafton and

(11) on energy ernission from Jupiter. gives off some three Jupiter to four

The authors

state

Jupiter

times more energy than to a constant for

he takes

up from the sun.

must be subject in

+) Not necessarily in mathematics but 1 > u b il c u n d e r s t a n d i n g . -4-

the presentation

additional

supply of

energy from the outside

if

one wants to And this

(9

recognize him as a planet like stands beyond doubt. of is, the earth therefore, Jupiter

the other planets.

has about 12-fol-d the diamecer the earth. lte

and may havr: 317 times the mass of in a position

to absorb substantially

rnore radional

energy and is

heatred up correspondingly,

From the reported

daLa (10), the product of the dianreter times the average density fo. Jupiter is about 2.7 times greater than that for the earth.

These are some 6f would speak for E!-!eigg4y rel,ations

the most important of

findings

and data which theory. to be aroused that and other could exist.

the fikelihoocj allowed

shielding

has already

the supposition of gravity

between the acceleration

accelerati.ons The principle

such as magnetic and electrostatic of simpricity

arone induces me to assume rikewise to the divining r assume its radiation we

and to extend this rod and simiLar that the fact of

hypobhesis about acceleration ]i.ke the pendurum. "magnetism', of alters

devices static induction field

Accordingry, core or for

an iron

erectromagnetic of the radional

the transparency deviate.

and makes this electrostatic

Likewise, like of

preferred

to relate

acceleration

the nagnetic

to an intensified radiation, or is the of

interception

and deviation of

the gravitationar charge It

conditioned

by the fact opposite I reject

the electrostatic

the two respective

pole charges together.

comprehensibl-e that idea of a nagnetic

like

Magvari and Stanvukovich or of an electrostatic phenomena. and rod.

"attraction,'

"attraction". For a longer

( )

These Likeraise can only time I

be int.erceptive experimentally the divining

have concerned myself with t h e p h e n o m e n ao f

. cinematographically

-5-

gravitational
( )

acceleration

in

the direction

toward the mass is

resulting The interaction of of this radiation with the atomic rnasses, because This

the very short

wave lengths

does not lead to ionization. In the use of

p h e n o m e n o ni s shorter

known to every roentgenologist. i n g a m m ar a d i a t i o n is already

wave length effect

from a 60Co

ionization absorption By contiast, besides to

considerably

tha "ouaaa, retarded by mass from an x-ray tube-

i n c o m p a r i s o n t o g a m m ar a d i a t i o n thi absorption a vectorial of "radional

energy" in a nass,

imparting

i m p u l s e m o m e n t u m ,s e e m s t o l e a d in theory

amplified

Brownian rnolecular motion and to a rise with it,

tenperature with

l " J eh a v e e n d e a v o r e d t o p r o v e t h i s

the aid of

some experimental that

data from space research of is sufficiently

recent

(J

years and believe

the result

interesting During

meantime to be reported of

on here. orbj.tal path

the orbiting

the noon by satetlites,

deviations greater

were discovered

which are produced by areas rvith below the surface of the Maria, of the moon mascons -

mass densities in

directly

and as a rule (6).

the vicinity of It

the lunar

The significance (7), (B), (9).

these nascons e/as already $/as steadily left

frequentfy un-

studied

practically gravity

considered mascons is fitted

that not

the elevated implicit in since

accel-eration of

over the also not is

the law of

!_g$g_! and is of

in by Einstein

the acceleration to the total

gravity

always only

set proportiona] changes in

mass of of

a body.+) like the law

Topographical

the acceleration

gravity in

those over the lunar of Newton.

mascons were not anticipated

The f ind j.nqs on the mascons are a very

-?-

strong

on the basis
( ",

of

the studies,

one time I an of gravitational of

the opinion radiation

that of

a change in the transparcncy for of the tr',ass

the rod under the influence At others,

the radiesthetic the con-

person musL be accepLed (5). cfusion that in

I came to

the rod a mechanismof from orthograde to

enhanced interception must exist. in This Iiquid affected, arises. in

and/or deviation conclusion led

character

the acceptance that in solid

Particularly

and gaseous media. buE also a dispersion The fact that of

media electrically radiation

the penetrating

gravitational

the funar position

mascons are not adequately effective this assumption. only large would A disnegative

counterpolar surface

speaks for

displacements in

such as the equatorial

exaltation

then result

a changed gravitational be the

acceleration. reason for the

'd

persion

phenomenon coul-d also the experiment of is

outcome of

Bouquer (12) if for it.

no insufficient (Bouquer had set

neasurernent technique up a gravitation

responsible

experiment on the volcano Chimborazo in 1740 in the gravitational in accelerationthe volcano). For Anyway,

and found no increase that purpose,

he assumed big cavities

the idea of magnetic,

a commonfundamental rnechanismfor electrostatic to me since

gravitat.ional,

efectromagnetic,

and radiesthetic it suggests the working

acceleration possibility out of

appears valuable of further

experimental

and technological positions. flight

the problem from different of gravitational

initial

Utilization (propulsion)

energy for

and space travel is thus the

and for

energy production, already

at any rate

imaginabLe and anyway is form of hot spr i ngs.

omnipresent

today in

-6-

the present state

(

of our physical the shielding

knorvledge and the theoretical conceived of the

interpretation

of

theofy of gravitation of

here feaves open the possibility radional field.

a change in density lead also

This would forcibly of gravity.

to a change in in the of

the acceleration field gravity factor

Theoretically,

an increase

energy would produce a reduction arso at the surface relative of the

in the accereration since

earth -

the absorption

becomes smaller

to the energy, however, in_ This would mean augmentated increased volcanic confronts us with activrty. problems

creases in absolute magnitude. heating .In Fact, up of the earth,

possibly the saurian

the anatomy of

which basically

have been previously

unaswered.

Diplodccus of such a

may have reached about 35 tons,

but the capacity doubtfuf tissue.

(d

co1 ossus for the limited eating

living

on the land is of biologicaf

on the basjs of The flyin9 fish_

strength

saurian

pteranodon attained

a wing span of lifting

I rn, but the animal

wing g.eometry appears inadequate for from It the earth,

the large

not to mention from the water. that for it,s skeleton of seems statically and

comes to the fact too light

dynamically capacity of

the size

the aninal

and the load Egeyf to bring I

the smaIl bonelets (13) have futilely into accord with

must be insufficient. tried in principle

and lrrhitf ield this finding

the present data on the earth. acceleration on the other

A substantially

lower gravitaEional answer this years

hand would easily about 100 million of the age set at

question,

The pteranodon Iived back

ago, somewhat over two percent for the earth. the raclional field

present

A change in the density for

or energy of

has

a consequence, moreover,

a change in

the compression factor

-7-

Lo

r^r

'l=

This can lead to incrcased volcanic activitv.

q v L 4 v r L . ) / .

( )

earthquakes, to continental rigid masses, for

drift,

and to great rifts

in the

example in the form of shielding theory,

Lhe canals on Mars. speculations or energy svsEem

In connection with which result content of in

above al1

an approximate esbimate of radiona] field valid

the density for

the actual

our solar

are tempting. instrument turn

Since, according to our current. knowledge, no such a measurement, we are consiqned to for it. the energy of greater the radional

can provide

to stell-ar

observations wilI

One al-ternative f iel-d is

be the one that to penetrate

sufficient

suns of

mass than ours in this

and to heat them up correspondingly. absoluLe sense is, to current therefore, is

This supposition

not very probable since

according

knowledge, there fusion

not much doubt about the energy suns: hydrogen heliurn -

{J

yielding carbon in

nucfear iron,

sequence in

and moreover, .Iarge cold At any rate, it is

masses are hypothesized however, off

the. universe. incident

conceivable, Iarge

that

gravitational nuclear

energy in fusion

masses can give The other energy of

starting

energy for is

processes. a field

alternative density.

the one of

pstulating

smaller

And here there

are some findings

which nake this mentioned the

assumption probable, possibility example of of

to conceive from the already variation in the field

a greater

energy in

the anatomy of

the saurian. forces lead to a compression the *) ac

In J.arge bodies, of the mass. of

gravitational

The compression factor

amounts to l-.8 for

center
(;

the earth iron.

when one assumes that in the center

the core consists of the earth is

of

liquid

The density of -8-

I!.25,

the average density

the earth may be 5.5I7,

the

lr

average surface density

2.6 (f0) . its central compression

13

?he larger factor

a planet

is, the higher

must be. 5.12 x I03, for

Although for Mercury an average density of Venus of Jupiter, density times 5.12 x 1g3, 6nd for twelve of times greater
. 1

the eartb of in

5.51 x ]03 are reported, only an average 317

diameter, exhibits

I.25 x 10-

(I0).

Since he possesses with he nrust exhibit t^lith this, to a very

this

the total centril

mass of

the earth.

a conthe density

siderable on his

compression factor.

surface

nould be constrained below 0.24 x 103.

srnall value, corresponds t.o the

theoretically reality

t^lhether thrs just 2.7 9

is more than questionable, acceleration of

even because of

high gravitational surface ( \ ) density of Jupiter. of Jupiter to

(2700 mgal) on the

(The product. of is

thc diameter X the average than that of the earth nay be energy

2.7 times greater (1"0), that

according cleared of

the data reported through the fact field is

This contradiction the gravitational

up only

the radional without

not sufficiently loss factor.

great to penetrate Thereby the smaller,

Jupiter

a very great of

gravitational or in

acceleration

Jupiter

toward the sun is mass is

other words, his gravitational than his inertial mass.

substantially masses and densities therefore, at a to be

smaller

The stated and are,

{10) are calculated

ballistically,

understood as gravitationa.l leading observatory

masses **). tbat

Inguiries the orbit

have revealed previously nass.

of Jupiter of

had not been studied gravi tational

t

$,it.h a differentiation

and inertial

"'

The fact

that

Mars (0.6 times -9-

the diameter

of

the earth)

has

ta

an average density

of

3'9 speaks a little retativc

against the conto a standard di.ameter, of the solar

aa

clusions outlincd a decrease in

here, so that

average density

for

the periphery

s)'stemmust be assumcl.

Also the values for mercury on one side indicate into this direction. here, -

and Saturn and PIuto on the other In addition also corrcspon.ling decrease in

to LhL. thcory the radional

put forward f iel-d with

a certain

increasi.nq this

dislance

from the sun can be cliscussed as the cause for This f in.ting does not suffice, Jupiter time,

phenonenon.

however, to refute as an example.

the argument expounded above with Therefore, at the present point theory in

I see no objection however, from

the shielding

of gravitational

effects,

the conclusions the identity

( )

mentioned, see myself heavy and inertial

1ed to doubt tbe axiom of accepted both Albert

of of

masses which is in that of

in

the theorv

Isaac Nevrtonand also

Einstein. For support to in the condensation of this tbeory I am obliged

thank D. Stokes and Dr. Ilenclrix, TeIluron CaIif ,, Dr. t'lax Presidski, and some of his

Research Co,,

Santa }lonica, Alexander City,

San Francisco, ltmpex coworkers' Redwood

M. Poniatoff as weII

Calif.,

as Dr. Peter Schmiddberger add the Burda FRG.

Arch i ves, Offenburg, Posr t scr i pt : The recording of

the text

was done Christmas' were published

1970.

In June,

1971 the k nown data on Jupiter in view of started

(-)

by NASA, lrhich

tbe Pioneer satellite I972 for

experiment which may be was brought up to

in

the study of Jupiter

date.

r n a d d i t ion to the positive Jupiter,

hcat balance already

mentioned her e for some other data

which no pfanet besides manifests, the arguments of shielding theory.

speak for

t3

The very Jupiter

strong

volcanic

activity

vrhich must be assumedon occurence of sulfur is iron

belongs among thr'nr. also

A considerable -

and suLfur in great requisiLe Jupiter

on the surface of Jupiter clouds allows

blown out

volcanic for

the theoretical

density of still

t.he present universe of

0.24 on the surface It is

to appear erroneous rather greal in

than realistic-

to be noted that The planet

ice sheets are also less in

suspected on Jupiter. axis so thaE a above if

rotates

than I0 hours on its the gravitational to the poles is is

considerable the eguator

reduction in

acceleration to be expected rather

comparison

the interceptive geneously, The present theory half of I97f

mass in Jupiter

distributed

homo-

(shielding

theory

of

gravitation)

in

the first

was brought to the knowledge of physicists as a manuscript are very for

a nurnberof their evaluation.

(q

distinguished

.The comments made on it Of great Dr. for Ernst value was only

revealing. comment, and indeed from Physics, Associate Director Hunts?,

one detailed for

Stulinqer,

Professor

Science,

N A S A , G e o r g e C . I q a r s h a I . l .S p a c e F I i g h t Stuhl-inger indicates in his letter

Center, of April

viIle, l97l

AIabama.

that. the energy necessary for form of (15) but also

the shielding

t.beory corin his

responds to the tachyion theory.

energ!' which Feinberq presents To it bel,ongs not only

a very high which Feinberg the

energy content

a new sort. of mass for the def in'ition of

inLroduced a graviton, factor [ -1 which is of

which includes

irnaginary. tachyion theory

The proposal

StuIinqeL. to Lrse Feinberq's

-r1-

lr 4\

in Lhe shielding

thcory of gravitation

is

in facE convincing. gravitation.rl

(q
'

PossibIy, forces

one must then abandr.rn thp axiom then that with the spced of light.

are transmitted

Because tlre but not

sul)stanceof Ieinberg's really rnass-equivalent,

Lheory of a highly field is

energetic,

the supposit j.on of Ite tries

an energy

form which is more rapid than Iigtrt. t h i s m a t h e n r a L j c a l l y( 1 5 ) . A tliscussion physicists earliest of the tidal

to demonstrate

phenomenon (ebb-f loorJ) with this also can be efucidated

critical at the

has shown that with

the shielding

theory. for that reason since the flood on

The interpreiation appears not only the side height. turned On this

was difficult on the side

turned

tovrard the moon but also at

aday from the moon, however, phenomenon, previously aII it

a somewhat lower of gravity

theories is

(a

fotrndered. the earth

Accordj-ng to shietding under the influence deformation of since of

theory shielding

assumed that

by the moon experiences is

a small oval smaller in

tbe compression pressure

the axis

the moonrs position. such an oval supposition deformation a f s o < . r st h e on

One must assume accordingly cause of the side necessity the tides. turned of This

can explain

the flood

away from the rnoon; it the tides

dispenses further hydrodynamic and brings

vrith the

explaining

as purely de facto,

phenomena, which is relation *) Iron:

not possihle of

out a

between the effect

the rnoon and earthguakes. the earth 6.9 of (molten), 7.86

Density at the surface of

(cold). nickel
()

Whenone assigns to the interior (density

the eart.h a core of

8,0 molterr, 8.9 cold) , or a nickel_-iron alloy,

the values

are changed correspondingly. -12.r ?

{* ) Atso al1'Lov6't^

Wr7

hZ4'\

c<,.l\'r-tJlr.r\

dg-hr-rs

a..rc qrs,r.^e.l

15

Lrterature:

(3

(I)

l4eber, J.. cravitational

498 (L967).

radiation.

p _ h y s .R e v . L e t t e r s I g ,
(1970).

s c i e n c e N e w sV o I . 9 8 , 4 4 - 4 6

+{

12)

I'lagyari, E. Power and energy transfer Hungarian Exporter used as gravitation No, I (1961). priv. K. p-, 9, t'tO. I, 4 (1959),

by penetration, Broadcasting g*porter tower ff,

laboratory. brief ,

lg"9urlg" ,,phvsica Nova".

(3)

stanyukovicb' Specials

the nature of gravit.ation. les Recherches sur 1962. in

Notar. la

Centre European pour publication A. J.,

. (4J

cravitation, Shneiderov, radional les *+

,'G',, 3,

Theory. of

nucLear forces

the

field,

Notar-

Speciale

Centre Europeen pout publication field ,,G,, 24_29 ,

Recherches sur La Gravitation, An outline IX, of the radional

(I952r,

theory,

I ' 1D

Astronautica )a. (4 prefactory) fietd (5)

4 (1962c1, J. cravitational fields. The hiqh

Djuric,

theory.

:roc.

IRE t6g9_1690 (I961). syndrome in men moving at speeds phB 354, March 1954. 9, The probrem

Nieper, not

H. A. Theory rad. refative

snarl

to c/so.

*_ (6)

of

the divining

rod.

l,tedHeute v,

459_461 (1956). Science

IluIIer,

P . 1 " 1 .a n d W . L . S j o g r e n ,

Lunar nascons.

161, 680 (r958). (7) Conel, J. E. and G. B. Holstrom. Luna nascons. A near

surface interpretation. (8) (9) OrKeefe, J. Urey,

Science 162, l4O3 (I969)the Moon. of Science 162, 1405 (I968).. the moon, Science

A. Isostasy of

H. C. Mascons and the history

162 1408 (1968).

)

l\o

tlnt

\ J W '

f)oc ments of

thp

coidv

S.ipnt i fic

TableS and References

Literature,
{\

Sixth edition,

P. 205-206, Basel 1960. His Iinb darkening Spience

(11)

Trafton.

L. M. and R. L. I'lildey, Jupiter: his internal

and Lhe magnitude of

energy source.

168,r214(r970).
(12) Todhunter, J. A. History attraction reprinted (I-3) and the figure of Methem. Theories of of the earth. l'lacmillan 1973,

Dover, New York, 1962, p. 248. c. R. Flying speed of the

Bramwel-I, C.D. and lvhitf ield,

1 ^ - ^ ^ ^ ! r q!},s-! - ^ i ^ l

vertebrate,

Nature

225,

660 (I970).

(14)

Baldwin,

R. B. Arguments for

a hot moon, Science )-70,

No. 3964, 1264 (1970). (I5) Feinberg, G. Possibility of faster than light particles.

llv=j:CI_3ggSlLI5e,

No. s 10Be-II05 (JuIy, 1e57).

L,
i'-) \ t

n l

Annex to the Shielding Theory of Gravity

("$

Fcrnbcrg Interceptive

Potentials

i n I l i o . lo c t i c . ] S v s t e m s . H. A. Nlc!,cr, M. D.

rn the siiierdrng Lheory of gravity which I presentcd in it,s finaf form in I912, I outlrned that most likely ..llf non-mechanicac_ celerations a r e d u e t o a c o m m o nm e c h a n i s n : N a m e l y , t h e i n t e r c e p t r . o n of -Feinberg energy vrhich, as it undergocs 'elastii, relations gives off monent.un. (Gravitational accelerition, erecLric, electrostatlc, electromagnetic, magnetic.) Also the accelerationof the divining rod is attributed to a change in the transparency of the rod's matter for the gravity field energy. I','e assuile that this hange of gravity energy transparency is caused b y a f l o w o r l o a d o f- c c harges which aie emifted by the rispectrve and suitabl,e person once he himserf staysi in a flow of emitted charges, e.9., from underground water dipolessince an efectric current or an electric potentiar of t.he common kind applied to t.he rod would not change it,s gravitationai oe_ haviour the energy florv produced by the 'activited, person nust be of a kind that differs from the convenLional electri.c load or current. !{e f ee.} that in his original paper teinl)erq hirnself thinks of a non-guantitized charge 'superinrposed' on the rver.t known ereccromagnetic field rather than of an entirely n e r . ,k i ind of energy. Thus, he feels that the Tachyion-Theory is welr in agreement witrr the princj.ples of relativity. The guestion which actuarr)' intrigucs rnc is : I.rhatkind of energy rnput is it that causes a change in the qravitational transparency o f t h e r o d ? I f h a t k i n d o f r o a c ' ri s i t t h . r t . t a k e s u p m o m e n t . u m from Feinberg energy, or helps the rod's matter to inLercept more? My opinion is - just for reason of ing load i.s Feinberg energy itself simpricity, that this interceptfed in by- the 'activated, person.

r'q

O r , i n o t h e r w o r d s : F e i n b c r q l o a d m a v . ln t c r c e ! ) t i n t r u d i n g F ei n b er g field. T h i s a s s u m p t i o n i s w e l l i n a i r eentent with the fact that the gravj tat ional field finds iLsel f in j remarkable steady stare. The fact that the 'activated' person obviously produces loads vrhich are Fernberg gravity fierd interceptive imposes the need to consider now Such superrmposedFeinberg energy can be formed in q a v briv^ rl v^ Y^ r ri-o-r r
SYS tem.

,fi1

since we know from Ritchie's revitating c o n c l e n sr e (r941) . from the Gray machine, and from the experiments tistcd in llassel's paper on gravrty conversion that essentiarly condenser foad phenomena are connected with gravity interaction I assumethat the condenser s y s t e m o f t h e c e I ] m e m b r a n e sa c c o u n t s f o r t h e ' f o r m u l a t i o n ' of Feinberg energy,

L8

such a.moder would perrnit us to understancl a variety of inportant b i o r o g i c a l p h e n o m e n a ;p o s s i b l y n o n r q u a n t i t i z e d ' e l a i t i c ' eiectric resonance which plays a role in immune interaction, immune re_ connaissance, in biotogical effecLs of very high but ,rhythmized, dirutions in homeopathy, smell reactions over ia.ge distinces (insects), focusing the direction of a small source, etc, AIso the abiLity of the shark Lo immeciiately direct himself toward a far distant blood source may be explai-ned by this kind of electrtc ,second,s phenomenon, resonance. The neuro-therapeutic as well as the imnediate activation of the thymus p=O rlsonating system by bee propolis may thus be explained. And the transmiision or certain psychj.c or mental function or reactions likewise. It is also. imaginable that we could learn more about Feinberg suoercharging of biological condenser membranesystems and maybe artif icaJ-ly manipulate this. possible results would be the following: Without interfering into his fundamental bioloqical behaviour such a man would Ievitate or gravitate differentiy, he would deflect light and, therefore, become invisible if not very nearby (as documented by the photo series of approaching ,old man type peoplet astronauts taken by !,trs. Cumber, he would 6eco*" m a s s - r e p e l l e n t ( r e s i s t a n t a g a i n s t p u n c h i n g , c a s e o f U S A FS e r g . NN. against 'baby face people, asLronautsj and he would be cipable to manipulate alI kinds of menta] reactions in nearbyor even distant people.
{

H. A. Ni eper , l'1D . . Med. Dept. S i l b e r s e e H os p i t a I Hannover P.S, ft is remarkable that for inmune interaction it needs the resonating activation of both the intruder and the immune system. Neutrality of the intruder (e.g. plastic, oiI, surgical implants) as well as of the thynic p=O system results in immune paralysis. Thi.s observation again speaks ?or a Feinberg -:- Feinberg interacting principle resulting in a steady state.

Literature:

Feinberg, G. phys. Rev. 159 No. Nieper. H. A

1 0 8 9 - l I 0 s .( r 9 6 7 )

B .M . 1 4 , I 9 7 2 ( G e r m)

(a
-2l a

l l

BROADCASTINC T O W E RU S E D A S

(3
(vol.

GRAVITATiON LARORATORY perhaps recall Our readers will that in January I959 the Hungarian Exporter 9, No. l, 1959 p. 4) gave an account of a new theory in physical gravication, elaborated by Dr. E. Magyari, Eng. and described as "Power and Energy TrAnsfer by Penetration. " It has now been reported that during the eclipse on Febrtrary the l5rh, 1951, Dr. llagyari put his theory to the test, using the 314 metre seriaL broadcasEing tovrer ai Lakihegy near Budapest for his gravitation experiment uhich inrpressively proved the truth of his ideas. The theory suggested that during eclipse the toi.rer vould display certain inclination phenomena Lhat would establish the physical character of gravitation, a problem unsettled since Newton's conception of classical pbysics. In the light of our current physical knowledge it seernedinpossible to "predict" uhat sort of phenomenatas to ensue but, basing himself on the theory he had evolved, Dr. Magyari put down in advance his calculations and these eere sealed in an envelope and placed in an official depositThe envelope was only opened after the measurements had taken place and his calculations r^,ere then compared with the facts established on the basis of the tower's inclination. Agreernent betr,,reen the two was strikins. Leaving out mathernatical deductions, Energy Transfer" is not very difficult to thought. the theory of "Penetration Force and grasp by a rnere logical train of

, J,

A s t o n o n e r G a m o \ ra s s e r t e d ( P h y s - R e v . l 9 4 l ) that the celestial bodies in the Milky tlay, Iike in all galactic systems of the Universe, are undergoing a continuous process of energization in lrhich they burst asunder into neutrinos or still srnaller particles under the developmenf of energies so immense that they defy human imagi nat i on. This al.so proves that the omnidirectional, uniforrn and statistical flow of energy in the interior of a galactic systern is not a supposition but a consequence. Of the Milky l.lay which measures nearly I00,000 light years in dianeter, the Solar system occupies about one third and its onn diameter is not more than 1/1000 of (One light year equals approxirnate l0 biltion a light year. kilometres). Thus the physical and nathematical including stabilities for local equalization, considerations of past millions of years, seem to be sufficient. To the view of Zehnder, Swiss physicist, pervade the that these particles heavenly bodies wirhout impedirnent, Dr- Magyari's theory has added the following points: l. If a spherical body is placed in the described kind of dynamical space (see Fig. l),'the input power level Ein cannot be anything but symmetrical in rel at ion to the sphere. 2. sipation, particles Since the penetrating probably suffer a uni form pover disthe output level Eout nanifests the same type of splrerical syrr,n)etry.

(d

'2 /r'\

3. The diffcrence in povcr lcvel bctweerr input an(l output (AE = . Ein Eout) remains entrapped in the body and acts rnostly in the forrn of energy or is bound in some other nay. 4. Owing to the remains motionless in spherical s)"nmetry betr.'een the energy levels, spite of theAE por.,er increase.

thermal

the body

From these points it is evidence that the forces of gravity acting on rwo bodies show the Pattern illustrated in Fig. 2tinder the influence of rnutual power disipation, the greatest losses occur at the inner side of the Ein and on the outer sides the Eout pover level surfaces, r.rith a certain surplus resulting in input level. This surplus determines the rrature of the P forces as penetrating forces of opposite tendency, driving the bodies, in inverse proportion to their masses, tovrard the commoncentre of gravityis interesting.to note that Newton hirnself seems to have guessed something for in a letter he mentioned the "ctlrerflux" as a source of force that Penetrates across the bodies while "it exercises some kind of Dressure'r on them. Thus there is direct evidence that the approach of bodies to each other always occurs in the direction of an absorbing sheet or absorbing mass, thrown in the path of the intacr power flux Eo. All rhis holds true for the interrelation of tlre masses. It this

of

What about three bodies situated What happens on the Earth's in one line? surface to the large mass of a tall vertically erected object during eclipse, especially during one q'hich occurs in the horizontal plane early in the rnorning, like the one on the l5th February? Classical physics and modern have only one ans!,,er to offer: when three bodies line up in the same straight, the gravitation forces of the heavenly bodies sum up and exert their influence upon the terrestrial object -- say on a tall chimney -- with the result of a plain East deviationDr- Magyari's forecast for the complete eclipse period was a different one: For the beginning phase of the Sun-ltoon coverage he predicted that, if unforseen wind conditions did not interfere, there would be a marked deviation uith increasing tendency from the normal state to the East, oging to the mutual compensation of the spherical dispersions, followed as the eclipse grew fuller, by a fairly sudden swingover to the l.Jest; this position would persist during the greater part of the eclipse period, with an East redeclination and a return to normal only tor.rard the end of the contact. Neittrer classical nor modern physics corrld have accounted for sucn predictions Lrithout the penetration and absorption theory of therrno-gravitation.

The measurements were taken under t h e d i r e c t i o n Urania Ob6ervatory. RESULTS

of

Dr

Gy Xulin,

head of

the

The tower i.nclinations exactly agreed in direction and size r^'itll the predetermined course. Taliing 100 to nark the total time-inclination area.

there

-2-

t,a

D , t. : . : r v r C - 1 r . i Jt . t i i :
Fr!.!., l!J.r.r. l. tr .'5r rlE:ior. iarr''D !at105a ! r5

x.,/
I
I

/,':1.,

o/ Ba6sleraZion aSSeS ca-uSed Zg ,71

na.rtzc(e-peneLra
1

J it,r: 4i x "

Qo= a.ceZ e rn7 iort

(

'l4e_e:_,/grtLg

:rb

ol r.h. l=.ltrIto, ot r!. lla E.:,. .,s:|=, (L. ..rrrrt o! F.H';,.l"..it*.-

D..'

rru.t;,dr

pp?rtrtt\-//.

7.oof
7i
. F

af

/hearu
Irt|r/

aZo,.e-.
fo-/ t e

t-9

/t.?,^!,

; . . 1a

fleq,rou's

/a

y->-.

t,'e/oc;tl af Y"'f *;' K= spzc.rlens;ty of ya 1! :j'/: s .

' ' - I ,
"f'i r, ^1. l'( -

= sPe Q 'C=

f{ mags , bat pmTcr t ia a aZlg pilh the AE qbsorbe-d e-tet ' qn4 ?he f. foZEr of Vr', e! riti oa.
C. r,;-299

T,ta-

').

df ?rn t'i!:'- ta;t s!etz: e tr cJg .1"z:,.erSeS.. __q'

..> '.1 ? U

.t ; t /' y?t^s.1:-l c ai t i te rT! rfgra ri ,t = lr, $r * S u l ! n e / r i r _ - : g a . r - o 7e f /,;hls za-

*f:,t.<d

Qy u'fZ:ftgtnslon
energl

!uL'/.?17o
.:..

/-

c.ri.,,;27 j 7'r;g /-.2 cl er-g,

'I! .

n.o.1-t, c ls,
otaict^

a{J.,si t y
Zs .

p'r38:-7; : Jne cln.

of sPo-cz

.atti a/-

e,{ p7:t,ze!g c?.7t, c la

o r/ z'?s

7-t ^'27 f(1,* ' - /!,) ' = ^ ,"'7vn,l,'2n

gp 2 = '-nr fa. c/e r o f.zp erte/ralt'en 2

_"@

of bodz es'
-.s t

5.2'?e anJTesifron
.Q.i 4iot

./2"

ec*ni/ft

,f
,

o
(

tra.s a 17 per cent deviation (insread of the I00 taught by physics) to the East and a 83 per cent deviation t o t h e W e s t ( r n s t e a d o f n o n e) . The results fuinished indisputable proof for the power absorbing nature gravitation phenomena on the basis of the potenton penetration theory. of

The peak-to-peak deviation was as large as ttro times 650 rnm(see Fig. 3). The two ten-rninute swings of the tolrer gavJ a dramatic and awe inspiring spectacle. The experience of these feu ,nsrngnls tepi ttre research tearn and the entire technical staff of the B. c- transrnitter in exciiernent as they forloved the movement of the tower through binoculars. These observati ons provi de evidence l. The mechanism of gravitation is that pouer absorptive in character-

2' The significant west decrination during the eclrpse must have been . due to a preliminary polrer absorption by the Sun which deprived the Moon of a propor_ tron of its mass effect, 3' The mass effect 'rattractive" telekinetic thought so ). induced by absorption must have had the character not of ',pressure,, (Newton force but of a penetrating himserf a

4. Nothing except the phenomenon o f p e n e t r a t i o n polrer transfer _ can account tor the mass-independent equal rate of accel erat i on --the ,'gravitational accelera_ cion"--in the field of gravrty. 5. fiost. aberations constellation. in the Sputnik orbits are due to the Sun-to-Itoon to Earth

Apart from these five p o i n t s a s d i r e c t consequences of there are measurements and t h e o r e t i c a I considerations vhich thought: 1. 2. The results They call have revealed for entirely a ner, aspect for

unquestionable validity, leave much room for

the "three-body" tackle the

probIem. theory',.

new physi cal

basi s to

"ether

l,

,f n

o
(

!ra.s a l7 per cent deviation (instead of Lo the East and a 83 per cent deviation to the West ( r nstead of

the 100 taught by physics) none)of

The results fuinished indisputable proof for the poner absorbing nature gravitation phenomena on the basis of the potenton penetration tbeorv.

The peak-to-peak deviation lras as large as tu,o times 650 nrn (See Fig. 3). The t!,o ten-minute surings of the tower gavi a dranatic and awe inspiring spectacle. tne experience of these few moments kept the research team and the entire technical staff of the B. C. transmitter i n e x c i t e m e n t a s t h e y f o l l o w e d t h e r n o v e r n e n to f the lol'er through binoculars. These observations l. provide evidence is that povrer absorptive in character.

The mecbanisrn of

gravitation

2' The significant west decrination during ihe eclipse must have . been due to a preliminary por.'erabsorption by the sun which deprivLd the Moon of a proportron of its mass effect_ 3' The mass effect telekinetic "attractive" thought so). induced by absorption must have had the character not of force but of r pnn.tr-rting "pressure,, (Newton hirnself' a

4. Nothing except the phenomenon o f p e n e t r a t i o n _ por.'er transfer can account tor the mass-independent equal rate of acceleration --the,'gravitational accelera_ tion"--in the field of gra.rity. 5. Most aberarions constellation. in the Sputnik orbits are due to the ,,rrr-ao-roon to Earth

Apart from these five p o i n t s a s d i r e c t consequences of unquestionable validity, there are measdrements and t h e o r e t i ca I considerations w h i c h leave rnuch roorn for thought: t. 2. The results They call have revealed for entirely a new aspect for the to

"three-body" the

probl ern. theory'l

new physi cal

basis

tackle

"ether

t
73

SECONDS

I5.835

T"-

' u'r > ' 3 5 . 8 3 =

F '

o tu

tr
all

35.833
' :

(o

-r
t2

.----t' 35.831 8 2l 2{ 9 ; . 1 2 , 1l5 5 | AUGUST . A U G U S7 T

I

S 2l HOURS

'l

6T ,: AUGUS 'AU6UST 5-7. 1975.' -t MOON : NEYI

:

I SAXL& ALLEN. {i FIGURE

O ' L; ' ..L -.;

I

L - _ \s, tr.r,+
c,-..t/ /-r.-,-/

-/, i--- :If ',;, n4""-. (o /,r"f

i{"rt'| ef

21

1../t,

(,

Annex to the Shielding

Theory of

Gravity

Fierd of a Dirferent Kind (Perisorar cravitv "t"";tt=""ii;"::;;ttt

Magyari, by his radio antenna experlment conducted in 196r. during an eclipse made a very interesting discovery: he was able to show that the attractive forces of llooi una-srn do not combine as one should postulate when following the Newtonian and Einsteinian laws' rnstead, rhe sun during"rhe deprives r;;-M;;. a parr of itrs mass effect. " " ie ip" ut a g y a r i p r , e n o m e n o n - i n e p e a k we calr-this th t-

o f w h i c h p r e c e d e ss l i g h t l v

rhe peak

From his observation Magyari has concluded hat gravitational a c c e l e r a t i o n i s 1 ) a p r e s s u r e p h e n o m e n o n , .tz l uS6ipti".-ii' a n d 3 ) d e f i n e d b v t h e q u a l i t v i r ' r . g . " r i i " t i " ;a "i'""..ey"rierd "r.',".a an ct de r , n o t b y t h e g r a v i t a t i n g r n a s s e sa n d t h e i r o r s r a n c e s arone.
Hassel in his p3per. on gravity conversion has listed resuft sinilar to that reported by Maqvari. an experimental

"i

'.'"'ecri;;;;';"iiiiit'.rr."t.

(J

For me it presented a certain charrenge to incorporate the Magyari p h e n o m e n o ni n r o r h e s h i e l d i n g t n . " i v 6 - ;i. g r a v i r y ; h i ; ; ; in"it," final forr,r, r had oublished in ltii: rhe Magyari phenomenon is definitely i.n c3ntradiction with Nentonian and Einsteinian laws r , r ef o u n d i t e v e n t u a l l y i n a g r e e m e n t w i t h the shielding theory. r have to confess that for a certain time r neglected the need to compry with the Maqyari phenomonen. onty sinc. it became obvious that there wilr- be-no. chince roi-a p.iri""ion of a nucrear brow in outer : :r Io t tp tu p e:r:t i e s o f t h e q r a v i t y to be most f ruitf ui.

s p a c e i n o r d e r - t o m e a s u r e9 . u i , i t y f i e r d p r o f e ; a i ; ; - : .. e x p e r i m e n t a t p r o p o s a r m a d eb y D a hyun bhen - r^=turluJ-[o con_ on the. Magyari phen6menon

f ier-d.

in order to learn more about the r feel that this effort turned out

( e
\ay

carcurared from it's ballistic data. The pion6er satellites d i d n o t provide data irhich permir ro clefine trpii"i;"-r;I;;it;;;;,";;";;:.: a prus of 253 for the masses of jovian rn"oni u, reported in the Ames NASA compendium on Jupitei woutrd perfe"try iuppo.t ry "on"irsrons. A s s u m in g t h a t J u p i t e r a b s o r b s s o m e . 2 5 t of the penetrating energy _ vrnrch resul.ts in its important radiating of heat - the Sun woui6

Jupiter's nnass wouta.be=;r. t;;-;;inli

'shielding A s r n e n t i o n e d i n m-y Theory' r had calcurated that the about Darth intercepts 4 - 4:5?, oi ii,"-pun"trati.n9 gravitational energy whereas JuDiter may intercept about 25g. ?his means that

tnun originarty

J2

surely intercept and absorb the intruding gravity Peinberg energy b y 1 0 0 3 . H o r , r e v e r ,t h e S u n d o e s n o t b e h a v e l i k e a t o t a l g r a v i t y shielder, otherrvise it rvould probably not emit light and it $ouId not produce the observed eruPtions, llow can this be explained? When we look at the preceding of the peak of the l'lagyari gravity phenomenon over the peak of the Eclipse's phenomenon we come light to the conclusion that by the time tl)e soLar gravity energy arrives at the Earth its speed is only slightly faster than that of light, m a y b e l . 5 - 3 c . However, for certain reasons we assume that the speed of the Feinberg gravity energy in the bac{groundrspace of our solar system should be in the range of aboul l0- to l0'c. The gravity effect of the Sun on the Earth and its moon may, therefore, be connected to a gravity field of a different qual ily My assumption is the following: The Sun absorbs all intruding gravity energy by its mass (or by a dense perisolar Peinberg field)? In exchange, it produces and emits a newly formed Feinberg f iel-d of the same energy content, or even more. It is likeLy that it produces rnore than it has absorbed since the characteristics of light emission and the dynamics of solar eruptions indicate that the Sun is repelJ-ent on its surface and not attractive. This assumption l' i s a l s o w e l l i n a g r e e m e n t v r i t h t h e f a c t t h a t M i c h e l s e n a n d M . 1 r 'a

f a i l e d r o p r o v e r h e d e ft e c r i o n o f l i 9 h t
opinion of

i""irra rffiy-;;

ffi",
to prove

thus correcting the earlier Einstein's postulat ion.

Eddinqton who tried

I assume the Sun to emit a gravity Feinberg field which in it'.. beginning is only slightly fasLer than the speed of 1ight, however, it is very dense and thus rich in energyAs it ftees from the Sun it nay dilute and also gain speed and diffuse. This, of course, would also say that Suns are fecders of energy and gravity fields. According to this rnodel the orbits of the solar planets are defined by the compromise between the solarpetal pressure of the outer space fieLd and the repellent effect of the perisolar fieId. This would resulL in 1) an orbit dependent from the average specific density of the respective planets, and 2) in a high pressure and heat on planets near to the Sun. As one know, these tvro requirenents seem to be perfectly It is true for the reported average fulfilled. densities of the planets as welI as for the physical data reported fron the surface of Venus. l'lost iTnportanbly. however, this model explains perfectly positi.on the Magyari phenomenonsince in ecliptic the Moon would be exposecl to a more powerful (perisolar) gravity radiation and, therefore, Iose a part of its mass effect on the Earth. This model, in addition. throws an explaining light on certain terrestial reactions counected with solar happenings. Again, we may play the game by imaqining a change in the energ), density (or speed) of 'our' outer space gravity field, as I did

-2-

2L

in

the original

paper on the Shiel<ling Theory in

I97I.'

J-) An increase in the energy content of the outer field would 1ead to: a)-decrease of gravitational acceleration on Earth, e.g. about 0.28 g at the time of the dinosaurs and the highly giowing flora. b) higher geothermal temperature, volcanic ac[iviti, c).a. deeper impression into the perisolar (repellent) gra;ity field which woutd result in an orbit nearer to the sun. The-surface of the Earth would be tvarmer. 2) A decrease of the energy content of the outer field would l-ead to: a) Increase of gravitational acceleration on Earth, because of an increasing percentile shielding differential. IIor ses having the size of dogs? b) Lower geothermal temperature, and c) a drifting into an orbit rnore distant from the Sun because of the repel lent effect of the perisolar field. This would result in glacial ages on Earth.

D r . H , A . Ni eper Med. Dept. Silbersee Hosp. Hannover FRG

(3

(r,
-3-

27

LIBRARY A. KEITHBREWER
DEPARTMENT AND RES:,ARCH SCIENCE ARCHIVES RUGE ADMIRAL
53581 RichlandCenrer,Wisconsin ( 608.647-6513

rtllgll-gl-ql4ylll LIsr oF SHTELDTNG

1. 2. 3.
4. 5. ;. T. 8. 8a. 9. 10.

PAPERS

?ages 1 .,

Prlc

Ouotations Bi ography-Dr. Hans NiePer Theory of .rr"tgy "nr.iiing

i.t)
t . )

as a cause of gravitational

effects

by Dr'
1 )

ll. 12.

t3.
14.

I spacevehicles 2 letter to Dr' NiePer 15. National Aeronautics and Space Adninistration I I976 2 6 ' NiePer letter to Alexander dated December i6. I 1976 '17. liieper letter to Alexander dated January 8' J 29' 1979 , 18. Nieper letter to va1 Rychly dated January l0' 1979 19. Nieper letter to v81 Richlt dated February to v8l Rychli dated Febr-uary 27 ' 1979 io.. Nieper letter I 15' 1979 2I . liiepe! letter to val Rychly dated Harch 15' 1979 22. Nieper letter to Dah Yu Cheng dated March I 2 5 ' 1979 23. NiePer letter to Va1 Rychly dated March I 1979 24. NiePer letter to va1 Rtchly dated Harch 31' 2 1 979 8' 25. Nieper letter to val Rychly dated APril 2 1979 26. Nieper letter tp val Rtchly dated April ?6' z f979 27. Nieper letter to Val Rychly dated Usy 6' 2 letter to Val Rychly dated May 19' 1979 28. r',*ieper 2 1979 29- Nieper letter to Val Rychly dated June 3' 4 1979 30.. liieper letter to Val Rychly dted June 24' 4 '| 3l. Nieper letter to Val Rycbly dated July 9' 1979 1 9 7 9 1 9 ' A u g u s t d a t e d 32. NiePer letter to Val Rychly I 26' 1979 33. Nieper letter to Val Rychly dated August I l' 1979 34- Nieier letter to val Richly dated sePtember 8' 1979 35. Nieper letter to val Rtchly dated sePtember 3 6 - M a g n e t o s P h e r e so f t h e G a l i l e a n S a t e l l i t e s T l0' 1979 31. Nieper letter to Va1 Rychly dated November I 3 8 - C o n m e n t so n t h e J - U . J . K o o y G r a v i t o n T h e o r y I 5' l9A0 39. Nieper letter to val Rychly dated.January ? 26' f980 4 0 . N i e p e r l e t t e r t o T o w n s e n db r o t n d a t e d J a n u a r y I ' 1980 41. Nieper letter to val Rychly dated February 2' I ' 42. NiePer letter to Val Rychly dated Uarch t5' 1980 ( " N " r n a c h i n e ) '43. uachine gathers energy from space, Physicist clairns I ro val Rychlv dated l'lay 3' 1980 N i e p e r 1\ for U'S- mailing add $ 2 . 0 0 . ,i6ru, Postage for foreign rnailing add $5'00 and

Hans NrePer 2 Dr. Grayis synopsis of theory of energy shielding 3 Gravity Field Cushion Theory Perisolar 2 slstems frorn Siological Porentials lnterceptive f"iltu.tg 2 cause of gravitatiol Rendel'i quocations--the -. Iuture Physics and ani 1and article' P h D . b iography I'li11iam F. Hassel, l) grav ity 1 Power Gray's l'lotor - A New Electric 2 K o o y speed and unmanned space flight--J'N'J' Gravitational Kooy and abberation by J'M'J' oi a gtavitational on the possibility 3 J . B er g h u i s m e c h in celestial speeJ of gravitation of a finite on ii""i.,tr".nce 5 E e r g h u i s J o h a n a n d anics by Johan H.J. Kooy J Particles--Feittb":g toss ibii i ty of Faster-than-Light .. 4 Broadcasti-ngtoverusedasgravitationlaboratorybY.}1'8Y".'._-.--, concepts ano Base-Coruoents on gravity froi Ed"ards Air loice Article

1.0 1 . 5 l.c Li
t - ) J . a

) . i
? . : l . : 2 - (

i.i

.: .: I _l l.( i.(