RATIONALE

This particular study on the post-Sendong assessment on the status of internally-displaced persons (IDPs) in six relocations sites in iligan city is designed to provide relevant data and information needed by development stakeholders in designing appropriate plans and formulating development interventions in addressing the priority needs of IDPs in the present relocation sites in Iligan City. This study is also conducted in order to identify, determine and showcase how the physical needs (land, shelter, water, waste disposal system, energy and infrastructure); socio-economic needs (livelihood, mobility, accessibility, source of income, health and security); and environmental needs (disaster risk management and environmental programs) of IDPS are being responded by stakeholders and the internally-displaced persons as beneficiaries of the different projects. This study also intends to propose recommendations that may provide relevant insights as to how to address the needs of IDPs, and what action plans are to be adopted and implemented in said relocation sites. The results of this study can also be used as objective tools for analysis and decision-making among stakeholders in the event that future development programs will be implemented in said resettlement sites. Formulation and preparation of survey tools, administration of survey instruments and other requirements of this study were made and conducted by the personnel of the Iligan Medical Center College and LIHUK, Inc., in partnership with the Partnership for Philippine Support Service Agency, Inc. The research team was composed of a panel of researchers, namely; Jose Dennis O. Mancia; Dr. Helen S. Tejero; Esmeralda R. Padagas; Arthur Homillano, Jr.; Alice C. Servento; Rufino N. Gonzaga and Marie V. Zuero. The urgency of coming up with a post-Sendong assessment report on the status of IDPs in the six resettlement sites has led the researchers to focus their attention on the different subjects in order to come with up appropriate data and information needed for development planning and determination of appropriate interventions. Thus, the idea of coming up with an assessment report was collectively presented and approved, and thereafter, research planning, including assigning of individual tasks, were conducted. Particular and specific assignments were given to individual members of the research team to focus on particular research subjects. 2

INTRODUCTION
A tropical depression east of Mindanao entered the Philippine Area of Responsibility (PAR) at 10:00 a.m. on December 15, 2011 and was named Sendong (international code name: Washi). At 4:00 p.m., December 15, 2011, Sendong intensified into a tropical storm as it moved closer to northeastern Mindanao. Public warning storm signal (PSWS) No. 1 was hoisted by PAGASA over Visayas and Mindanao. At 10:00p.m. on December 15, 2011, tropical storm Sendong maintained its strength as it increased its threat to northeastern Mindanao and eastern Visayas area. PSWS No. 2was raised over Visayas and Mindanao while PSWS No. 1 over some parts of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao. At 4:00 a.m. on December 16, 2011, tropical storm Sendong has slowed down slightly as it continued to threaten northeastern Mindanao and eastern Visayas area. At 10:00 a.m. on December 16, 2011, tropical storm Sendong has slowed down slightly as it continued to threaten northeastern Mindanao and eastern Visayas area. PSWS No. 2 was raised over Visayas and Mindanao while PSWS No. 1 over Palawan, Cuyo Island, Visayas and Mindanao. At 4:00 p.m. on December 16, 2011, tropical storm Sendong made landfall in the vicinity of Hinatuan, Surigao del Sur. PSWS No. 2 was raised over Mindanao while PSWS No. 1 over Palawan, Visayas and Mindanao. At 10:00 p.m. on December 16, 2011, tropical storm Sendong maintained

its strength and was now in the vicinity of Malaybalay City, Bukidnon. The location of the center as of 4:00 a.m. on December 17, 2011 was 20 km west northwest of Cagayan de Oro City at coordinates 8.4 N, 124.4 E. (NDRRMC, January 2010).
KITANGLAD MOUNTAIN RANGE
ILIGAN CITY
CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY

Fig.1.Flood Susceptibility Map of Parts of Iligan City Fig. 2. Path of Typhoon Sendong that destroyed (photo courtesy of DENR MGB 10) the cities of Iligan, Cagayan de Oro and Bikidnon

Tropical Storm Sendong unleashed its fury, destroying with great damage the cities of Iligan and Cagayan de Oro, including other areas in Mindanao and the Visayas. The destruction caused by the flood, aggravated by thousand of logs carried downstream by the rampaging flood waters, did not only wrought havoc to properties and caused massive displacement to more than 20,000 families in 3 more than 34 barangays, but also caused tremendous deaths of thousand of residents living along river communities in Mandulog.
Fig. 3. Thousands of logs carried downstream Fig. 4 A house in Bayug Island buried by soil and logs. during Sendong.

The Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) based in Iligan City recorded 1,232 individual deaths, of which 566 were still missing. In terms of damages, the same agency reported at least 7,911 houses were totally destroyed and 14,874 were partially destroyed. Most of these houses were located along riverbanks in Brgys. Mandulog, Upper and Lower Hinaplanon, Pugaan, Digkilaan, Tambacan, Santiago, Sta. Felomina, San Roque, Tubod, Abuno and Tipanoy.
Fig. 5. Mandulog Bridge stuck with logs and Fig. 6. Entire Orchids Village destroyed by debris at Brgy. Hinaplanon Sendong.

The same report has also estimated that 22,522 families were affected or roughly 101,337 individual population of the citys 322,821 total population were rendered homeless and are still dependent on relief goods and resettlement programs of international humanitarian organizations and by the local government. At present, there are 14 transitory (or temporary) shelters or bunkhouses that are being occupied by 560 families. On the other hand, as of January 2013, there are six permanent shelters that were established by the GMA Kapuso in Brgy. Mandulog; by the Gawad Kalinga and Habitat for Humanity in Brgy. Sta. Elena; by the Red Cross in Digkilaan; by the Deus est Caritas in Brgys. Upper Tominobo and Dalipuga; and by the Diocese of Iligan in Brgy. Luinab. 4 The local government of Iligan has received from local, national and international humanitarian donors more than Php 300 million of cash donations intended for Sendong victims and survivors.
Fig. 7. Transitory shelter at Brgy. Mandulog Fig. 8. Transitory shelter at Brgy. Dalipuga built by sponsored by the Catholic Relief Services (CRS) Deus CarItas

LOCATION AND ACCESSIBILITY

Iligan City, once described as the Industrial City of the South is located approximately 89 kilometers southwest of Cagayan de Oro City, and lies along the eastern coast of the province of Lanao del Norte. Geographically, it lies within coordinates 8 13 36 North latitude and 124 14 30 East longitude and is bounded by Iligan Bay to the west, the Municipality of Lugait, Misamis Oriental to the north, the municipalities of Baloi, Linamon and Tagoloan, Lanao del Norte to the south and the provinces of Lanao del Sur and Bukidnon to the east. It boast a total land area of 81,337 hectares which is divided into 44 barangays. Iligan City is easily accessible by land and sea transportation.
Fig. 9. Aerial view of Iligan City Fig. 10. Location map of Iligan City (Google)

The Integrated Bus and Jeepney Terminal (IBJT) caters trips to and from Cagayan de Oro City and

various parts of Misamis Oriental, while the Southbound Bus and Jeepney Terminal caters trips to and from Dipolog City, Pagadian City, Ozamiz City, various parts of Lanao del Norte and Lanao del Sur, Including Cotabato and the rest of central Mindanao. 5 The city has appropriate port facilities that enable it to cater to various passenger shipping lines to different destinations including Manila, Cebu, Bacolod, Ilo-ilo, Dumaguete and Ozamiz City.

TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE

Iligan City is characterized by a narrow coastal plain bordered to the south and east by hilly terrain representing the footslopes of the rugged mountain peaks farther inland. The coastal plain is relatively flat to gently rolling with elevations rarely exceeding 20 meters above sea level (masl). Towards the highlands, the terrain is rolling to moderately steep with slopes ranging from 5 to 15%. Farther inland, the high and rugged mountain ranges appear with elevations varying from 500 masl to more than 1,000 masl. About 63% of Iligan Citys 81,337 has. land area have slopes of over 30%. Only about 2% have slopes of 0 3%, 15% fall between 3-18% and the remaining 20% are within 18-30%.
Fig.11. Mandulog River before Sendong Fig. 12. Mandulog River after Sendong

Iligan City is mainly drained by the Mandulog, Iligan-Pugaan and Agus Rivers, their numerous tributaries, some smaller water bodies and man-made creeks. These rivers drain their loads toward Iligan Bay. The two major river systems, the Mandulog and the Iligan-Pugaan, cut across the coastal plain and serve as the main regional outflow of the city. The Iligan-Pugaan River basin is approximately 250 km2 wide. The floodplain has about a 200-meter wide channel and an average depth of 5 m measured from the top of the alluvial terrace. In some cases, erosion and scouring of riverbanks occur. During the dry season, the stream flow follows a narrow path on the riverbed. On days of extreme precipitation, the river usually overflows, causing flooding in the city. Mandulog River lies about 5 km north of the heart of Iligan City. It has an estimated area of more than 550 km2. The river flows in a westerly direction and empties its load into Iligan Bay. From the mouth up to approximately 3 kms inland, the river flows in a 100-m wide bed with a deeper channel. Mandulog River is susceptible to severe flooding and riverbank erosion. River discharge is greater than that of Iligan River. Based on aerial photographs taken on different years, Mandulog River continuously changes its course. In aerial photos taken in the 1950s, Mandulog River charted a northerly course as it drained into Iligan Bay. At present, and possibly since the late eighties, the river flows westerly into Bayug before it discharges in the same bay. 6

CLIMATE AND VEGETATION

The climate in Iligan City belongs to Type III of the Modified Coronas Climate Classification of the Philippine Atmospheric Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA). It is characterized by a short dry period of one to three months, where rainfall is not very pronounced, relatively dry from November to April, and wet during the rest of the year. Heavy rains usually occur in the months of January, February, June, September, and December. Annual average temperature is 27.4C.
Fig. 13. The famous Tinago Falls at Brgy. Buruun. Fig. 14. Limunsudan Falls at Brgy. Rogongon.

The predominant vegetative cover consists of coconut groves and banana plantations which are found in plateaus and other lowlands as well as in slopes and highlands. Heavy tropical forests are found in slopes of 30% and greater and these are mostly located inland. A few swampy areas covered with marsh grass are within the barangays of Del Carmen and Bagong Silang. Some fruit trees such as mango, durian, jackfruit and tropical hardwood like lauan, molave, apitong, etc., are scattered in cultivated areas in the hinterland barangays.

AFFECTED BARANGAYS
A team from the DENR MGB Region 10 conducted a rapid assessment of parts of some of the most affected barangays in Iligan City caused by tropical storm Sendong. The team assessed Barangay Santiago, all the puroks in Bayug Island in Barangay Hinaplanon and the four puroks in Barangay Sta. Filomena adjacent to Bayug Island. Barangays Hinaplanon and Sta. Filomena are connected through a spillway.
Fig. 8. Orchid Homes totally devastated by Sendong Fig. 9. Properties totally washed out in Brgy. Santiago

7 According to the report, Barangay Santiago is composed of 21 puroks. It has a total land area of 110,419 has. with a population of about 8,124. (Profile of Barangay Santiago, 2008?) The entire Barangay Santiago was inundated on December 17, 2011 brought about by the effects of tropical storm Sendong. However, damages varied from purok to purok. The worst-hit puroks are those adjacent to the river mouth of Mandulog River (Puroks 7, 6, 13), as well as those adjacent to creeks and other tributaries. These creeks are either active, intermittent, or dry river/creek bed. These puroks include 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8.
Fig. 10. Floodmark (red arrow) in Purok Ilang-ilang, Fig. 11. One of the school buildings in Brgy. Brgy. Sta, Felomena was measured at 4.25 m. Santiago destroyed by Sendong. Flood height (Photos courtesy of MGB10) reached 2.6 m (marked with red arrow)

The puroks which did not suffer massive damage include Puroks 1 (boundary with Brgy. Tibanga), 9, 10, 11, and 12. However, these puroks were also all flooded, with som portions in Purok 9 which happen to be vacant lots. Portions of Brgy. Santiago was a former mangrove area. Further, these were reportedly created out of garbage deposits. The Iligan City High School Annex in Purok 5B was inundated by 1.15m floods. This is about 85 meters from the coast. It is also adjacent to the dumpsite. Floodwaters in the badly-damaged Cabili Village Elementary School in Purok 3 reached 2 meters. The GK Village in Purok 4 experienced 2.5 m floods. The team also made and assessment in Puroks Duranta A, Duranta B, San Francisco and Ilang-Ilang in Brgy. Sta. Felomena. Floodwaters reached more than 4 meters within this vicinity. These puroks are situated atop a dry riverbed. In Brgy. Hinaplanon, the DENR MGB team assessed Puroks 1 to 9, all in Bayug Island. This island is in the junction of Mandulog River and Bayug Creek. Scouring is evident along the riverbank. The entire Bayug Island was heavily inundated, from 1.5 meters (Purok 5, near the coast) to 3 meters (Purok 7). The old map shows what is now known as the river mouth of Mandulog River was formerly only a creek known as Bayug Creek. However, the former northern segment of Mandulog River has since become heavily silted and is what is known today as Bayug Creek. This heavy sedimentation has resulted in the change of the course of the Mandulog River.

General Situationer on the Affected Houses of Tropical Storm Sendong Table 1. Houses Affected by Tropical Storm Sendong
HOUSES AFFECTED BY TROPICAL STORM SENDONG BARANGAY
NUMBER OF DAMAGED HOUSES TOTALLY-DAMAGED PARTIALLY DAMAGED TOTAL NO. OF HOUSES 1. Abuno 4 27 31 2. Bagong Silang 10 1,222 1232 3. Bunawan 1 1 2 4. Bonbonon 95 183 278 5. Dalipuga 1 19 20 6. Del Carmen 100 100 7. Digkilaan 92 399 491 8. Dulag 220 220 9. Hinaplanon Proper 1,531 1,521 3,052 10. Hindang 2 2 11. Kalilangan 20 7 27 12. Lanipao 120 120 13. Luinab 36 53 89 14. Mahayahay 112 1,325 1437 15. Mainit 14 210 224 16. Mandulog 245 300 545 17. Pala-o 86 835 921 18. Panoroganan 31 121 152 19. Pugaan 22 196 218 20. Rogongon 212 323 535 21. San Miguel 150 150 22. San Roque 318 1,124 1,442 23. Santiago 561 1,283 1,844 24. Sta. Felomina 642 136 778 25. Sto. Rosario 367 367 26. Tambacan 141 2,461 2,602 27. Tibanga 96 274 370 28. Tipanoy 10 192 202 29. Tubod 145 1,711 1,856 30. Ubaldo Laya 63 572 635 31. Upper Hinaplanon 932 822 1,754 32. Villaverde 423 423 TOTAL 5,422 16,697 22,119

Source: CSWD Confronted with the serious challenge to immediately respond the need of providing relief and relocation for flood victims, the Local Inter-Agency Committee (LIAC), whose membership include the LGU; the different United Nations agencies; international humanitarian organizations; Office of the Civil Defense; national government agencies; and local non-government organizations, was organized by virtue of and Executive Order signed and approved by Mayor Lawrence Lluch Cruz in 2011. 9 The Local Inter-Agency Committee (LIAC) is tasked with drawing up appropriate plans and crafting policies for the development of the resettlement sites as viable, self-sustaining communities through participatory engagement of all stakeholders. The LIAC will ensure that housing units in the LGU and other resettlement sites are awarded to qualified beneficiaries. LIAC is also tasked to confirm qualified beneficiaries identified by the Beneficiaries Selection, Arbitration and Awards Committee of other forms of shelter assistance. The LIAC has the following four Sub-Committees,

namely; the Beneficiary Selection, Arbitration and Awards Committee; Social Preparation Committee; Site Selection Committee; Relocation and Transfer Committee.
Fig.12. A once thriving community totally washed out Fig. 13. School building, church, gymnasiums has become and devastated by Typhoon Sendong. Immediate evacuation centers for Sendong survivors.

In general, the duties and responsibilities of the LIAC is to serve as the over-all coordinating body for the entire disposition process of the resettlement sites of the LGU; formulate and adopt the necessary rules and guidelines for land acquisition and for the selection of beneficiaries; come up with a schematic work plan that will expedite the disposition of the property to the beneficiaries; approve the masterlist of the qualified beneficiaries; identify resources and develop systems and procedures for resource mobilization and project implementation; decide on all issues and concerns affecting the implementation of the project; solicit the participation and expertise of other public and private sector organizations, including international organizations, for the effective implementation of the project. 10
Fig. 14. LIAC meeting discussing the status of IDPs in the Fig. 15. Mayor Lawrence Cruz signing MOA with relocation sites in Iligan City (Photo courtesy of HRO) representatives of Habitat for Humanity

The Local Government Unit (LGU)

The LIAC also defines the roles and responsibilities of member-agencies. As such, the Local Government of Iligan City shall serve as Chair of the LIAC; convene the LIAC to a meeting as often as necessary for the purpose of planning, coordinating, assessing and monitoring the activities in the resettlement sites; monitor the activities of the various member- agencies and organizations under the LIAC relative to the implementation of the disposition of the LGU resettlement sites to qualified beneficiaries; call on any national government department or agency for assistance whenever necessary; assist in the formulation of the guidelines for the disposition of the subject property and in the selection of beneficiaries; oversee the implementation of the disposition process of the housing units.
Fig. 16. Checking condition of survivors In the Fig. 17. Monitoring flood victims at Kabangahan. encampment areas.

11 The LIAC is also tasked to coordinate with the various concerned government agencies, bureaus and instrumentalities, including private sector organizations; conduct the necessary surveys: boundary, structural, subdivision, topographic as needed for planning and design of the sites; approve all Plans of the Resettlement Site Development Plans as prepared by the Technical team of the LGU; secure all necessary permits and clearances for project implementation; keep track of the progress of project implementation in the resettlement sites and prescribed corrective measures to the concerned agencies if necessary; accept the Project upon completion and provide the necessary maintenance and repair of the project.

1. The National Housing Authority (NHA)

The National Housing Authority shall serve as the Vice-Chair of the LIAC; assist in the formulation of the guidelines for the disposition of the housing units and in the selection of beneficiaries; undertake social preparation activities in coordination with the concerned government agencies as well as with the POs in the resettlement sites; assist in the validation of Master List in close coordination with the DSWD, LGU of Iligan City, PCUP, NGO and the concerned IDP representatives/POs.

2. The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR)

The Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) shall facilitate the issuance of Environmental Compliance Certificate (ECC) and GIR and monitor compliance with the conditions stipulated in the said ECC; review and verify LGU-submitted relocation, topographic and subdivision

surveys of the resettlement sites, including computation of the technical description based on applicable land use and approved subdivision scheme; facilitate the verification and approval of subdivision survey of the area; facilitate the approval of the boundary and subdivision plan and technical descriptions.
Fig. 18. DENR-MGB doing risk assessment survey at Fig. 19. Doing site development at Brgy. Upper Tominobo. Brgy. Sta. Elena.

3. The Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH)

12 The Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH) shall provide funds and undertake the land development in accordance with the approved plan of all LGU and other identified resettlement sites; ensure the completion of the tasks given within the timeline in coordination with the Project Management Team overseeing the development of the projects.

4. The Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD)

The Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) shall provide assistance on the conduct of social preparation activities such as dialogues, consultations, etc.; assist in the conduct of master list validation in coordination with NHA, LGU of Iligan City, PCUP, concerned NGOs and IDPs/POs; assist in the formulation of the guidelines for the disposition of the housing units and in selection of beneficiaries; provide other programs and projects for the benefit of the IDPs/Pos.
Fig. 20. Inter-Agency consultation with civil society Fig. 21. LGU officials with the International Committee of and international humanitarian organizations the Red Cross

5. The Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC)

The Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) shall assist in the formulation of the guidelines for the disposition of the housing units in the LGU resettlement sites and in the selection of beneficiaries in coordination with the concerned agencies, NGOs and IDPs/POs; monitor the implementation of the projects. 13

6. The Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor (PCUP)

The Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor (PCUP) shall provide assistance on the conduct of social preparation activities such as dialogues, consultations, etc.; assist in the conduct of master list validation in coordination with DSWD, NHA, LGU of Iligan City, concerned Barangay LGU, concerned NGOs and IDPs/POs; assist in the formulation of the guidelines for the disposition of the subject property and in selection of beneficiaries; accredit urban poor organizations operating in the Resettlement sites; facilitate the process of representation of the IDPs/POs and in the LIAC.

8 . Representatives of the IDPs, Peoples Organizations (PO), and NGOs/Civil Society

Representatives of the IDPs, Peoples Organizations (PO), and NGOs/Civil Society shall participate in the formulation of the guidelines for the disposition of the housing units and in the selection of the beneficiaries; participate in the conduct of community relations, social preparation and information dissemination activities including the drawing up of the development plan; participate in the decision-making process over matters involving the protection and promotion of their legitimate collective interest; participate and ensure the smooth transfer of the beneficiaries to the resettlement site, and apply for accreditation with PCUP and registration with HLURB.
Fig. 22. Volunteers and military sending relief goods Fig. 23. NGO volunteers doing medical mission among and medicines to hinterland barangays. Sendong victims and survivors. Fig. 24. Distribution of food regularly done by Iligan Fig. 25. Medical Mission conducted by military doctors. Medical Center College

14

Status of Shelter Needs of IDPs

The Beneficiary Selection, Arbitration and Awards Committee (BSAAC) of the LIAC came up in September 11, 2012 a status report regarding the shelter needs of IDPs mostly affected by

Sendong. Table 1. shows the total number of IDPs needing permanent shelters; the number of IDPs processed by BSAAC; and the number of qualified and disqualified IDPs after series of assessment and selection activities. Table 2. Total Number of IDPs Needing Permanent Shelters TOTAL NO. OF IDPs NEEDING PERMANENT SHELTERS 7,911 NUMBER OF IDPs PROCESSED BY BSAAC 2,113 NUMBER OF DISQUALIFIED IDPs 262 NUMBER OF QUALIFIED IDPs 1,851
Table 1. Number of shelters needs of IDPs (Source: BSAAC Evaluation report, as of January 2013)

The BSAAC also reported the areas and the total shelter requirements of IDPs whose houses were totally and partially damaged, and those which were flooded. Table 2 describe these information as follows. Table 3. Total Shelter Requirements of IDPs in Danger and Non-Danger Zones AREAS TOTAL SHELTER REQUIREMENT DANGER ZONES (totally, partially flooded) 5,841 NON-DANGER ZONES (totally damaged) 2,070 TOTAL 7,911
Table 2. Status of shelter requirements of IDPs in areas identified as danger and non-danger zones needing shelter requirement. Source: BSAAC Evaluation Report, January 2013. Fig. 26. Families grieving for the loss of properties Fig. 27. The wrath of Sendong that claimed millions of and loved ones. damages

15 The same BSSAC report also identified the danger and non-danger zones where totally, partially damaged and flooded houses were located. In the areas covering the non-danger zones, 2,070 houses were totally damaged; 3,597 houses were partially damaged, and 9409 were flooded, with a total number of 15,076 houses affected . In areas classified as danger zones, 2,377 houses were totally damaged; 2,289 were partially damaged and 1,125 were flooded, with a total of 5,841 number of houses affected. To sum up, there were about 15,076 houses which were flooded; 5,841 houses both partially and totally damaged, with a total of 20,917 houses totally affected by Typhoon Sendong.
Fig. 28. On going construction of housing units at Fig. 29. More housing units to be built at GMA Kapuso Village Bayanihan Village, Brgy. Sta. Elena at Brgy. Mandulog.

In January 2013, the LIAC submitted a Relocation Project Updates based on on-site accomplishments of housing project being undertaken in all relocation sites. However, for purposes of this particular study, only six (6) relocation sites are included in the assessment. A Resettlement Action Plan for Transitory IDPs now sheltered in various transitory shelters was also drawn up by the LIAC for planning considerations. Table 4. List of Transitory Shelters
TRANSITORY CENTER LOCATION NO. OF OCCUPANTS PLACES OF TRANSFER DATE OF TRANSFER 1. Luinab Gym 1 Luinab 30 Bayanihan Village, Sta. Elena Bay Vista Village, Dalipuga Jan-March 2013

2. RASFI Luinab 27 Bay Vista Village, Dalipuga Jan-March 2013 3. ATI Building Upper Hinaplanon 30 Bayanihan Village, Sta. Elena Upper Hinaplanon Village Jan-March 2013 4. ATI Bunkhouse Upper Hinaplanon 40 Bayanihan Village, Sta. Elena Upper Hinaplanon Village Jan-March 2013 5. IBJT Tent Tambo 28 Iligan Bay Vista Village, Dalipuga Jan-March 2013 6. Dy Property Pala-o 109 Bayanihan Village, Sta. Elena Bay Vista Village, Dalipuga Jan-March 2013 7. Mandulog IOM Mandulog 25 GMA Kapuso Village, Phase 1 & 2, Mandulog Jan-March 2013

16
8. Mandulog CRS Mandulog 63 GMA Kapuso Village, Phase 1 & 2, Mandulog Jan-March 2013 9. Sta. Elena Bunkhouse Sta. Elena 27 Bayanihan Village, Sta. Elena Bay Vista Village, Dalipuga Jan-March 2013 10. Upper Tominobo Bunkhouse

Upper Tominobo 43 Caritas Village, Upper Tominobo Jan-March 2013 11. Bagong Silang IOM Bagong Silang 59 Bayanihan Village, Sta. Elena Bay Vista Village, Dalipuga Jan-March 2013 12. Bagong Silang CRS Bagong Silang 40 Bayanihan Village, Sta. Elena Bay Vista Village, Dalipuga Jan-March 2013 13. San Roque CRS San Roque 24 Bayanihan Village, Sta. Elena Bay Vista Village, Dalipuga Jan-March 2013 14. MSU-IIT Coop Upper Hinaplanon 40 Bayanihan Village, Sta. Elena Bay Vista Village, Dalipuga Upper Hinaplanon Village Jan-March 2013 15. Upper Hinaplanon Upper Hinaplanon 29 Bayanihan Village, Sta. Elena Jan-March 2013 Table 3. List showing transitory centers; location; no. of occupants; places of transfer and date of transfer as reported by the Housing and Resettlement Office (HRO). Fig. 30. Mr. Reynaldo Roque,head of the HRO, Fig. 31. Local officials with Mel Tiangco of GMA Kapuso addressing IDPs during a Community consultation. at at Brgy. Mandulog

Table 5. A Relocation Project Monitoring Updates

NAME OF PROJECT AREA (has.) CLASSIFICATION NO. OF PROJECTED UNITS NO. OF HOUSES TOTAL STATUS ONGOING
COMPLETED

1. Red Cross Village, Brgy. Digkilaan 3 Off-Site

320 320 320 JV Red Cross, 320 units occupied 2. Bayanihan Village, Brgy. Sta. Elena 15.9 Off-Site 1,712 513 861 1,374 JV GK, Habitat, PICE 674 units occupied 3. Deus caritas Village, Brgy. Upper Tominobo 8 Off-Site 400 32 141 173 JV Diocese,124 units occupied 4. Deus Caritas EstVillage, Brgy. Upper Luinab 5 Off-Site 280 280 280 JV Diocese, 280 units Occupied 5. GMA Kapuso Village, Brgy. Mandulog 3 Off-Site 200 60 60 120 JV GMA Kapuso, 60 units occupied 6. Deus Caritas Village Brgy. Dalipuga 3 Off-Site 25 25 25 Diocese, 25 units occupied TOTAL 37.9 2,973 605 1,678 2,292 1,483 units occupied Table 4. A comparative report on Relocation Project Monitoring Updates submitted by LIAC to LGU. (Source: LIAC)

17

Rehabilitation and Resettlement Plan

Table 6. Rehabilitation and Resettlement Plan

ACTIVITIES RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES TIME TABLE 1. Validation of affected families and screening of applicants for resettlement; DSWD/CSWD December 2011 January 2012 2. Provision of temporary shelters/tents; DSWD, RED CROSS, ROTARY December 2011 January 2012 3. Identification and development of resettlement sites in Sta. Elena (15.9 has.); Mandulog (3 has.); Bonbonon (1 ha.); Luinab (2 has.); Dalipuga (4 has.); and other suitable sites; NHA,CMO-HRO, DPWH,CEO January June 2012 4. Construction of Core Shelters; DSWD/CSWD, CEO, GK, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, DIOCESE OF ILIGAN February June 2012 5. Relocation/Transfer of families affected; DSWD/CSWD, CEO, GK, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, DIOCESE OF ILIGAN June August 2012 6. Provision of livelihood to affected families CSWD, CDLO September December 2012
Source: CMO-HRO

PHYSICAL STATUS OF IDPs IN SIX (6) RESETTLEMENT SITES Specific Location and Geography Table 7. GEOGRAPHICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
NAME OF RELOCATION SITES GEOGRAPHICAL AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS LOCATION ELEVATION (masl) SLOPE SOIL TYPE (original) CLIMATE 1. Red Cross Village Digkilaan, Iligan City

+ 50m
10-15 degrees

Sandy loam
Type3 Corona classification

2. Bayanihan Village Sta. Elena, Iligan City

+20m
10-15 degrees

Clay loam
Type3 Corona classification

3. Deus Caritas Village Upper Tominobo, Iligan City

+100m
30-40 degrees

Clay loam
Type3 Corona classification

4. Deus Caritas Village Luinab, Iligan City

+100m
15-20 degrees

Limestone
Type3 Corona classification

5. GMA Kapuso Village Mandulog, Iligan City

+50m
10-15 degrees

Boulders, sand/gravel
Type3 Corona classification

6. Deus Caritas Village Dalipuga, Iligan City

+ 200m
40-45 degrees

Limestone
Type3 Corona classification Table 5. Estimated calculation of geographical and physical characteristics of resettlement sites based on actual ocular surveys.

18

Geo-Hazard Vulnerability and Risk, and Security Risks Assessment

Table 8. GEOHAZARD VULNERABILITY AND SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENTS
NAME OF RELOCATION SITES GEOHAZARD VULNERABILITY RISK ASSESSMENT SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT FLOOD LANDSLIDE

EARTHQUAKE ARMED CONFLICT ANTI-SOCIAL ACTIVITY TRIBAL CONFLICT

1. Red Cross Village, Brgy. Digkilaan, Iligan City

HIGH MEDIUM LOW LOW MEDIUM LOW TO MEDIUM

2. Bayanihan Village, Brgy. Sta. Elena, Iligan City

HIGH LOW LOW TO MEDIUM LOW LOW LOW

3. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy. Upper Tominobo, Iligan City

LOW HIGH MEDIUM LOW LOW LOW

4. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy. Luinab, Iligan City

LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW LOW

5. GMA Kapuso Village, Brgy. Mandulog, Iligan City

HIGH MEDIUM LOW MEDIUM MEDIUM MEDIUM TO HIGH

6. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy. Dalipuga, Iligan City

LOW HIGH HIGH LOW LOW LOW

Table 8. A table showing the geohazard vulnerability and hazards status, and security risk assessment of IDPs In the six resettlement sites in Iligan City. Fig. 32. Deus Caritas Relocation Site at Brgy. Dalipuga Fig. 33. Deus Caritas Relocation Site at Brgy. Tominobo

Fig. 34. This area is dangerous for flooding A sign Fig. 35. The Mandulog River just 1.5 meters below the inside the GMA Kapuso Village in Mandulog. floor area of the resettlement site in Mandulog

19

LAND EROSION AT STA. ELENA

Fig. 34. Absence of canals and low elevation of floor Fig. 35. Risk of landslide is high at Bayanohan area at Bayanihan Village. . Village in Sta. Elena.

Land use Allocation

Table 9. Land Use Allocation
NAME OF RELOCATION SITES
LAND USE ALLOCATION AREA (HAS.) AVE. LOT AREA PER HOUSING UNIT FLOOR AREA OPEN SPACE EASEMENT AND ROAD NETWORKS

1. Red Cross Village, Brgy. Digkilaan, Iligan City

3 40 sq. mtrs. 5 x 7 mtrs. 0.30 has. 0.75 has.

2. Bayanihan Village, Brgy. Sta. Elena, Iligan City

15.9 40 sq. mtrs. 5 x 7 mtrs. 1.59 has. 3.97 has.

3. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy. Upper Tominobo, Iligan City

8 40 sq. mtrs. 5 x 7 mtrs. 0.80 has. 2.00 has.

4. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy. Luinab, Iligan City

5 45 sq. mtrs. 5 x 9 mtrs. 0.50 has. 1.25 has.

5. GMA Kapuso Village, Brgy. Mandulog, Iligan City

3 45 sq. mtrs. 5 x 9 mtrs. 0.30 has 0.75 has.

6. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.

Dalipuga, Iligan City 3 40 sq. mtrs.

5 x 7 mtrs.

0,30 has. 0.75 has.

Table 9. Showing the land use allocation of the six IDP resettlement sites.

Six Permanent Sites of IDPs

KAPUSO VILLAGE
Mandulog Mandulog, Iligan City 200 rowhouses
ONGOING ACTIVITIES: 1. 20 ongoing house construction . 2. 10 classroom building ongoing construction 3. Organization of HOA 4. Development/building permit on process 5. IOM Bunk houses construction

IMMEDIATE CONCERNS: 1. Site Development Fund 2. River control protection 3. Electrification and water supply

Fig. 36. Deus Caritas Village, Luinab, Iligan City Fig. 37. Kapuso Village, Mandulog, Iligan City

20

BAYANIHAN SA ILIGAN VILLAGE

STA. ELENA, ILIGAN CITY 1,712 rowhouses ONGOING ACTIVITIES: 1. b . backfilling ackfilling and main road opening 2. ongoing 437 units construction (134 completed w/o septic, doors and windows) 3. Lay Lay-out for IOM temporary shelter (200 units) 4. Development/Building Permit on process IMMEDIATE CONCERNS: 1. Payment of the land 2. Site Development Fund 3. Land Erosion 4. Water supply

RED CROSS VILLAGE

Digkilaan Digkilaan, Iligan City 292 Single detached

ONGOING ACTIVITIES: 1. Backfilling 2. Land survey 3. Preparation for May 8 ground breaking ceremony IMMEDIATE CONCERNS: 1. Site Development Fund 2. River control protection 3. Electrification and water supply

Fig. 38. Bayanihan Village at Sta. Elena, IIigan City Fig. 39. Red Cross Village at Digkilaan, Iligan City Fig. 40. Villa Medalya Milagrosa, Upper Tominobo. Fig. 41. Deus Caritas Village, Dalipuga, Iligan City.

21