The Great Gas Heist | Lola Nayar, Arindam Mukherjee, Madhavi Tata

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?286692

WEB

MAGAZINE

SECTIONS

INTERACTIVE

FEATURES

REGULARS

RESOURCES

RSS

WIRES

LAST TELEGRAM SENT TO RAHUL GANDHI

/

National

Cover Stories

MAGAZINE | JUL 15, 2013

Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/) 1 of 7

15-07-2013 13:04

The Great Gas Heist | Lola Nayar, Arindam Mukherjee, Madhavi Tata

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?286692

PHOTOS WIRES BLOGS LATEST

Cong Hits Back at Modi Over 'Burqa of Secularism' Remark SC Rejects PIL Challenging CAG's Appointment IAF's MiG-21 Crashes in Rajasthan, Pilot Killed One Killed in WB Panchayat Poll Violence Inflation Rises to 4.86% in June Last Telegram Sent to Rahul Gandhi 15-Year-Old Allegedly Raped by Neighbour in Delhi The Telegram (1850-2013), R.I.P. Don't Believe Cong Until Telangana Bill is Passed: TRS Complaint Filed Against Modi For Godhra Riots Remark

FEATURED BLOGS & WIRES Its done PM Manmohan Singh with Mukesh Ambani. (Photograph by Jitender Gupta)

Amar Gopal Bose (1929-2013) Pran (1920 -2013) Gujarat Riots: Uproar Over Modi's 'Puppy' Analogy Bartoli Who Won't Ever Be a Sharapova First An Eyewitness, Now A Blogger
SHORT TAKES

RELIANCE

The Great Gas Heist

One beneficiary, clear and corporate. How the UPA played for political positioning.
LOLA NAYAR, ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, MADHAVI TATA Like 310 Send Tweet 111

COMMENTS

PRINT

2 06 JUL 2013, 5:44:27 PM | BUZZ

TEXT SIZE ALSO IN THIS STORY

In the Niira Radia tapes, theres this one delicious conversation the PR lady has with lobbyist Ranjan Bhattacharya. It was May 2009, and UPA-II cabinet formation was in full swing. Bhattacharya quotes Reliance Industries Mukesh Ambani as telling him, Haan yaar, you know Ranjan, youre right, ab toh Congress apni dukaan hai. Apocryphal or not, that earthy expression of ownership is relevant in the aftermath of the UPAs recent decision to raise gas prices for five years, starting at a flexible $8.4/mmbtuconceding a long-standing demand by Indias most powerful business house and its global partner BP. This must be said because, apart from the Left parties and AIADMK, few even in the political establishment are raising obvious questions about this deal, of which Reliance, the countrys largest private sector gas producer, is the major beneficiary. The whole pricing exercise has been riddled with conflicts between the ministries of power, fertiliser, finance and petroleum; the formula has invited severe criticism; and theres an attempt by the UPA to airbrush the obvious negative impact of the hike on the common man and taxpayer. Nearly everything will become expensive; or, obviously, the taxpayer will bear these subsidies. Back-of-the-envelope calculations by Outlook show that the cost of this gas hike on just the power, fertiliser and lpg industries will be in the range of Rs 54,500 crore per annum. Also, the costs of industry in general will go up. It is a massive loss to the nation. Already, fertiliser prices are soaring. Now, they will be increased again. This is a clear case of placing profit above people, says Prof K. Nageshwar, an MLC from Andhra Pradesh. On the other hand, aided by a depreciating rupee, gas producers will rake it in. Every $1 increase in gas price means $73 million profit for Reliance, says Nageshwar. The irony: gas was meant to be a cheap, green fuel. Theres also a political brazenness to the timing. A decision slated for April 2014 has been announced a good ten months before, neatly sidestepping an election code of conduct and buying the support of a crucial corporate. Given that AIADMK has said that it would review the deal if a coalition it is part of comes to power, this pre-emptive pricing takes the decision out of the hands of (potentially, of course) an unreliable Third Front coalition. With elections around, whod want to upset a major source of funding? says a political analyst.

There is even more cofusion about the Headley interrogation report, as it turns out there had been an earlier allegation, on June 23 in the Sunday Guardian which put the number of these paragraphs as 158 and 159 (and not 168 and 169) as mentioned by Headlines Today which have now been rubbished by lawyer Mukul Sinha thus: Abhinandan Mishra, Senior Correspondent of Sunday Guardian on 22 June 2013 declared in his weekly that David Coleman Headley apparently answering to a question by NIA in June 2010 had said the following. 158. On being asked about Ishrat Jahaan, I (Headley) state that in late 2005 Zaki ur Rehman Lakhvi introduced Muzzammil to me. Having introduced Muzzammil, Zaki talked about the accomplishments of
ADVERTISEMENT

ELSEWHERE IN OUTLOOK

The Ottavio Quattrocchi Files 'Sensational Tokenism' Paris Diary An Arbitrary Blackness Gallops In Rags, Riches, Retro Pulp Undeserved End Bracket (Sir) Andrew Murray Lootera Anand Gandhi You Are Hereby A Terrorist
RECENT

Given the token response by the BJP (see box), it appears that the national interest will ignite in the principal opposition party only after 2014. Its no secret that, considering the growing (and open) corporate support for Narendra Modi, the UPA has made Somayajulu, Member, YSR Congress a political bargain by keeping Reliance happy. It is not just Governing Council political parties that are observing a measured silence. Industry chambers, normally eager to put their point across to the media, were also trying to avoid eye contact. Last week, Modi, who normally draws a full house in his meetings, saw only a handful of prominent industrialists attending his session at a CII conclave in Mumbai. Finance minister P. Chidambaram and petroleum minister Veerappa Moily have rightly pointed out that currently the public-sector ONGC and OIL dominate gas production. But what they have failed to clarify is who will bear the subsidy burden for the power and fertiliser sectors. Going by the track record of the government, the state-owned exploration companies may well have to pick up the tab. That leaves only Reliance. With global energy giant BP as its partner, there is no telling when the incentivised partners may reverse the drop in production to capitalise on the higher gas prices. They (Reliance) have been waiting for this announcement for a long time. Production will go up, says a person associated with Reliances D-6 block in

Bartering Indias interests to the corporate world, the damage they have done is unfathomable. D.A.

MOST VIEWED MOST COMMENTED

How Real-Life Tamil Love Stories End Go With The Swing You Are Hereby A Terrorist Were Building Fences, Protecting Our Race, Religion Buddha Mortified Top Engineering Colleges 'Sensational Tokenism' Anawrathas Battle-Axe Bullets Speak A Story Top 100 Engineering Colleges In India

Find us on Facebook

Outlookindia
Like

Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/) 2 of 7

15-07-2013 13:04

The Great Gas Heist | Lola Nayar, Arindam Mukherjee, Madhavi Tata

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?286692

the Krishna-Godavari basin, declining to be quoted. The biggest beneficiary is going to be Relianceeyes closed. Against the committed production of over 70 million metric standard cubic metres per day (mmscmd) at the KG basin, output has been as low as 15 mmscmd. Reliance has been in a high-octane war with the CAG, which has said the company is to be faulted for not complying with agreed investment and development plans. Our production will go up only in mid 2017-18, an RIL spokesperson says, seeking to deflate the charge that the price revision was orchestrated to benefit Reliance. In some three years, when Reliance hopes to bring its R cluster and satellite fields in the KG basin block into production, the gas price in the country may well have reached $10/mmbtu. The company has made other finds of gas condensates in recent months. The indications are all in Reliances favour. It could well emerge as the biggest gas producer in the country unless ONGC can be stirred to monetise its discoveries, including in the KG basin. ONGC and OIL did not respond to Outlooks queries. The government habit of selective picking of recommendations, including from the Rangarajan committee report, has come in for criticism. The new formula (cherry-picked from the report, and approved for 2014-19) is, to put it simply, based on the average of European nbp, Henry Hub of US and Japans import gas price plus the average of Indian gas import price. The formula is unique to India: no other gas-producing country has devised such a convoluted way to reward exploration companies. Moreover, the government has deviated from the committees recommendation of a monthly review, instead opting for quarterly revisions. Thus, the revised price of $8.4 per mmbtu put out by the government is merely an indicative price.

The cost of power and fertiliser will go up, so the government will have to moderate the impact. B.K.
Chaturvedi, Member,

Planning Commission In another instance, the Rangarajan report spells out that the pricing policy should apply only for future investments. In that case, most of the gas being produced in the country currently should not see any change in price. But that distinction has not been kept. The UPAs selective adoption of proposals, totally ignoring the concerns of its own ministries, defies logic. The US economy has turned around essentially due to lower gas price. What is the window for India? asks Anil Razdan, former power secretary.

What is particularly upsetting is the decision to equate domestic gas price with that of imported LNG, which has additional cost burdens of liquefaction, transportation and regassification. This also goes against the panels recommendation. But petroleum minister Veerappa Moily has been persuaded to believe that the import lobby is behind alleged attempts to scuttle Indias chance to become self-sufficient in oil and gas production. B.K. Chaturvedi, a member of the Planning Commission, who was on the Rangarajan committee, defends the formula: As far as the committee is concerned, it stands by its recommendations. The committee was conscious that the governments contractual commitment under the exploration policy (NELP) had to be honoured; therefore the prices were accordingly recommended. He does admit that the higher gas price will have bearing on the power and fertiliser costs, so the government will have to find a way to moderate the impact. The state government-owned Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation (GSPC) is another likely beneficiaryit has also been seeking a higher price to make production from its K-G basin block viable. At the same time, D.J. Pandian, chairman of gspc says, Even though gspc stands to benefit as an upstream company, we will be put to great hardship as power producers, for it will add Rs 2 per unit to our cost. Given that a large chunk of power goes to agriculture and industry, the hike in power tariff will hurt end-users.

Experts are critical of the government assumption that higher gas prices will attract foreign investments, as in the last 10 years, despite pegging crude oil prices to import parity and deregulating all petroleum products, inflow of FDI has been Venkatesh, CA And Political Analyst, insignificant. The assumption is based on a false premise. Chennai What worries me is that the subsidy bill will be humungous if this price goes through, says CPI(M) Rajya Sabha member Tapan Sen, who feels let down by fellow parliamentarians. The opposition should have come a long time back. Unfortunately, gas price seems unlikely to be a major issue in the upcoming elections. So far, only Tamil Nadu chief minister Jayalalitha has spoken against the price hike. Says M.R. Venkatesh, a Chennai-based chartered accountant and political analyst, Like in the case of GST, this should have been discussed with the states, as they would be affected. The decision looks coarse and arbitrary and is likely to be challenged under Article 14 of the Constitution. Well, even if the deal is done, its the post-hike reluctance to discuss its fallout that is the most worrying. I dont see any political fallout caused by this decision because political parties in our country are not vigilant enough, says K. Keshav Rao, a former Congress Rajya Sabha member who recently joined the TRS. Thats when one wonders if a delay in decision-making is actually better than a wrong one being takenall in the name of reforms. *** Primer: Everything You Need To Know On The Gas Price Rip-Off What is the gas price all about? It is natural gas produced within the country; unlike imported liquefied natural gas (LNG). This is viewed as a cheaper and more environment friendly fuel compared to imported crude oil. Where is this natural gas found? Both onshore and offshore. Currently Bombay High produces the most gas; Assam, Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Tripura are other states where gas is being

Like with GST, this should have been discussed with the states. The decision seems coarse, arbitrary. M.R.

Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/) 3 of 7

15-07-2013 13:04

The Great Gas Heist | Lola Nayar, Arindam Mukherjee, Madhavi Tata

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?286692

produced. How much gas does India have? In 2012-13 India produced 47,558 million cubic metres of gas, a drop of 14.5% from the previous year. Indias gas imports have been steadily rising, up to 30% of total consumption last year. Which companies produce this gas? The biggest players are state-owned ONGC and OIL, and Reliance Industries Limited (RIL). In addition, there are other players like BP, Niko, Cairn Energy working in various joint ventures. Who do they supply gas to? According to government allocation, the first priority is to power and fertiliser plants; then for production of LPG or cooking gas; up next is other industries and city gas including piped gas and CNG. How will you be affected? Households are obviously impacted as they are the end-users of power, piped gas and compressed natural gas (CNG); if fertiliser costs go up, agriculture produce is bound to reflect it. Who will benefit from price hike? Technically, both public and private sector explorers. As ONGC and OIL pay dividend to government and contribute to subsidy bill, the top beneficiary will be RIL, the biggest private producer. What impact will the gas price hike have every year on tax payers? Power plants: Rs 46,360 crore p.a. Urea production: Rs 3,155 crore p.a. LPG production: Rs 1,620 crore p.a. Total: Rs 51,135 crore p.a. At current $ prices: Rs 54,500 crore* Sources: power, urea, LPG figures based on estimations made by concerned ministries in the CCEA note on gas price hike. Total cost arrived at $ value at Rs 59. *** Inverted Logic Why the gas price hike doesnt make sense Government View Counter View

Need to attract foreign investment Will help to improve domestic production of oil and gas Public sector companies like ONGC and Oil India Limited will be bigger beneficiaries Will subsidise gas for power and fertiliser sector. Government will earn more through profit and royalties

Import parity price for crude oil in past 10 years has failed to woo big foreign investors The hike with prospective effect comes even as gas production has been slipping in recent years PSUs pay government huge dividends, also share part of subsidies: moreover, PSU gas production has hit a plateau Reversing the efforts to cut down subsidies would put fiscal prudence at risk Sure it will earn more but only lose it through additional subsidy burden ***

How UPAs Four Petroleum Ministers Have Dealt With The Gas Issue Mani Shankar Aiyar, May Murli Deora, Jan 2006-Jan 2004-Jan 2006 Shunted out for 2011 Known as Uncle to the keeping the Ambani brothers, then Ambani brothers, he pitched together, at arms length. Aiyar, for Mukesh in the legal fight however, also did his best to get with brother Anil. In the ONGC to focus more on improving process, he changed the domestic oil and gas production. provision for market-determined gas prices. S. Jaipal Reddy, Jan 2011-Oct 2012 Took unprecedented decision of not allowing Reliance to recover $1bn cost incurred on unutilised infrastructure. Paid for not permitting early review of gas price: he was unceremoniously moved. M. Veerappa Moily, Since Oct 2012 After famously blaming import lobbies, the minister granted Reliances demand for high gas prices, ignoring the concerns of power, fertiliser industries and impact on consumers.

By Lola Nayar and Arindam Mukherjee in Delhi, Madhavi Tata in Hyderabad

Like

310

Send

Tweet

111

COMMENTS

PRINT

TEXT SIZE FILED IN: AUTHORS: LOLA NAYAR | ARINDAM MUKHERJEE | MADHAVI TATA PEOPLE: MUKESH AMBANI TAGS: OIL-GAS-FUEL | OIL-GAS-FUEL PRICES | RELIANCE INDUSTRIES | UPA SECTION: NATIONAL SUBSECTION: COVER STORIES

Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/) 4 of 7

15-07-2013 13:04

The Great Gas Heist | Lola Nayar, Arindam Mukherjee, Madhavi Tata

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?286692

Follow us on Twitter for all updates, like us on Facebook for important and fun stuff
TRANSLATE INTO: Powered by

Translate
ALSO IN THIS STORY

RELIANCE

Lips And Purse-strings

Money talks; it also gags. A 2014-fixated BJPs muteness on the gas-pricing issue proves that.
ANURADHA RAMAN, PRARTHNA GAHILOTE
JUMP CUT

A Wellhead Of Blunders
Why did our market-friendly policymakers revert to the much-maligned administered price only for gas, while batting for market prices for all else?
T.N.R. RAO
RELIANCE

Reliable Attitudes
YSRs long fight for a share of KG basin gas
MADHAVI TATA
JUMP CUT

Self-Reliance, Not Reliance

What we see now is a new and indigenous form of McCarthyism.
MOHAN GURUSWAMY

11 comments Add a comment...

Sandeep Kathe Norwalk, Connecticut Seems UPA ( with help from BJP) have now started open loot instead of hidden scandals . Reply Like Saturday at 11:34am Lenin Kispotta KIIT +2 SCIENCE COLLEGE MAN ! how is this possible...and where is BJP....??? looting Reply Like Saturday at 9:50am View 5 more
Facebook social plugin

Post a Comment
You are not logged in, please log in or register If you wish your letter to be considered for publication in the print magazine, we request you to use a proper name, with full postal address - you could still maintain your anonymity, but please desist from using unpublishable sobriquets and handles

DAILY MAIL HAVE YOUR SAY | READ ALL 56 COMMENTS

56/D-43
JUL 13, 2013 09:10 AM

Reliance refines oil in the largest refinery in the world. The more oil that it refines, the more economical is the price which is afforded to O. N. G. C., the distributor. The amount of crude oil to be imported by India, to be refined at the Reliance Refinery, is increasing at a great pace. It seems, we are paying not for the refining, but for Crude Oil. It appears, that the oil producing nations, will have no choice, but to increase much cheaper imports and at a much lower price. Not that their profits will not increase, and greatly, and I think the Reliance revenues are also increasing. The great unhappiness in politics is, that our govt. within, also has a constituency, and the opposition is as vocal as the govt., in voicing increasing oil cost. For instance, if the C. P. I. (M) was in govt., they would have discontinued, in the govt., also because of the unfair situation that they would have been seen to be less represented in the parliament, and they would be obliged to resign. There must be people in the cabinet, who are more vocal about oil prices, than any other issue.
ADITYA MOOKERJEE BELGAUM, INDIA PERMALINK | LIKE (0) | DISLIKE (0) | REPORT ABUSE

55/D-20
JUL 12, 2013 05:10 AM

>>As I say its a tough place to do business. Indian politicians are famous for taking a bribe but offering nothing in return. Reliance is probably old fashioned anyway. What politicians are now interested in is real estate. I know, sometimes Indian businessmen just wish they made their

Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/) 5 of 7

15-07-2013 13:04

The Great Gas Heist | Lola Nayar, Arindam Mukherjee, Madhavi Tata

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?286692

own Antilla flipping burgers at MacDonalds so politicians won't be able to get their hands on it. no worries, let's have Peace Tea by Coca Cola :) http://www.bevreview.com/2013/03/18/review-peacetea-razzleberry-tea/
HITESH BRAHMBHATT SAN DIEGO, UNITED STATES PERMALINK | LIKE (0) | DISLIKE (0) | REPORT ABUSE

54/D-145
JUL 11, 2013 10:56 PM

:lol: all problems are now solved. The Iranians are getting desparate. Iran asks India to settle all oil payment in rupees: Govt sources http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/business/india-business/Iranasks-India-to-settle-all-oil-payment-in-rupees-Govt-sources /articleshow/21023851.cms
MK SAINI DELHI, INDIA PERMALINK | LIKE (0) | DISLIKE (2) | REPORT ABUSE

53/D-143
JUL 11, 2013 10:32 PM

#52 >>>So, are you now saying that "money for lobbying" is what is holding the interest of the pols or you are saying pols don't have any interest in Reliance? they take corporate money but their primary interest is getting re-elected. If corporates can help them that is fine. But that doesn't mean the corporate always gets its way. Indian politicians are famous for taking a bribe but offering nothing in return. Reliance is probably old fashioned anyway. What politicians are now interested in is real estate. The Indian politician is also feudal in nature. Say if a corporation offers to fund all the free laptops that the politician is promising. So it happens once, but do you think the politician wants to beholden to the corporation? Not likely As I say its a tough place to do business. It would be much easier if it was a corporate sponsored oligarchy (like China), as many here seem to believe
MK SAINI DELHI, INDIA PERMALINK | LIKE (0) | DISLIKE (1) | REPORT ABUSE

52/D-141
JUL 11, 2013 10:15 PM

#50 >>Their goal is to get elected by pandering to their constituency, who certainly don't care about Reliance. I did not say they are in love with Reliance but divorce is hard when so much money is involved. >>Only the state can pay for that, not Reliance. Oh the loss-making PSUs? >>Reliance can go bankrupt as far as any politician cares. If they don't have money for lobbying then the pols will lose interest anyway So, are you now saying that "money for lobbying" is what is holding the interest of the pols or you are saying pols don't have any interest in Reliance? Former seems to be self-evident and latter is less believable than next bollywood blockbuster about Yeti in Himalayan foothills.
HITESH BRAHMBHATT SAN DIEGO, UNITED STATES PERMALINK | LIKE (0) | DISLIKE (0) | REPORT ABUSE

HAVE YOUR SAY | READ ALL 56 COMMENTS Comments Policy

AB OUT US | CONTA CT US | SUB SCRIB E | ADV ERTI SI NG RATES | COP YRIG HT & DIS CLAI MER | CO MME NTS P OLICY

OUTLOOK TOPICS:

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 0123456789

Or just type in a few initial letters of a topic:

Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/) 6 of 7

15-07-2013 13:04

The Great Gas Heist | Lola Nayar, Arindam Mukherjee, Madhavi Tata

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?286692

Print to PDF without this message by purchasing novaPDF (http://www.novapdf.com/) 7 of 7

15-07-2013 13:04