Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
COPIES: 1 PAGES: 13
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file:
FROM: Rowley
TO: Mueller
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
Possible Lines of Inquiry for Team #6
FBI Counterterrorism Strategy [to the extent not covered by the Joint
Inquiry]
*How the FBI's Counterterrorism strategies are developed and implemented,
both at the Field and HQ level.
*The role of the Justice Department, the White House, and the Director of
Central Intelligence in the FBI's Counterterrorism strategy, policy, and
budget.
Possible interviews: DOJ, White House, and FBI officials (listed in greater
detail on investigative plan).
Headquarters vs. Field [to the extent not covered by the Joint Inquiry]
The ability of FBI HQ to set, guide, and enforce its Counterterrorism priorities;
the extent of field offices' autonomy in setting their own investigative priorities.
Whether the FBI's management career track and promotion policies are affecting
HQ's ability to run an effective national Counterterrorism program.
Collection
How decisions to open an investigation are made, and the extent to which
investigative decisions are driven by either the Field or HQ counterterrorism
strategy.
The factors involved in the decisions to close investigations, and HQ's role in this
process.
*Informants:
The training FBI agents receive in recruiting informants, both in New Agent
training and in in-services.
How decision to employ FISAs of Title Ills in particular investigations are made,
both at Field and HQ level.
How FISA and Title III targets are selected and prioritized.
Legal obstacles affecting the FBI's ability to effectively utilize these collection
techniques.
*Physical Surveillance
How these collection techniques are utilized, and any legal obstacles to
effective collection.
How the FBI goes about collecting open source information, and how this
information is used in the course of its counterterrorism investigations.
The extent to which legal barriers are affecting the FBI's ability to collect and
utilize open source information.
Possible interviews: Officials from Choicepoint and Axiom, and from civil
liberties organizations, headquarters and field office analysts.
Possible documents: FBI policies on the collection and use of open source
information, documents on agreements reached between the FBI and these data
mining companies.
information from other federal agencies, state and local authorities, and foreign
governments.
What type of counterterrorism information the FBI receives from other entities.
How the FBI determines what information it needs from other entities, and the
way that this process works.
Obstacles which affect the FBI's ability to receive necessary information from
these other entities.
Processing
The FBI and DOJ policies for processing raw FISA and Title III information, who
is responsible for this processing, and how it actually occurs.
The FBI and DOJ policies for processing other raw collection data, such as
foreign language documents, and surveillance logs, who is responsible for this
processing, and how it actually occurs.
The FBI and DOJ policies for processing/documenting information derived from
interviews, and how this actually occurs.
How the FBI processes information provided by the private sector, and data
mining companies.
The FBI and DOJ policies for processing information derived from other
collection techniques, such as Pen Register/trap and trace.
Dissemination:
The FBI and DOJ policies for dissemination information derived from informants,
who is responsible for this dissemination, and how it actually occurs.
The FBI and DOJ policies for disseminating information derived from electronic
and physical surveillance, who is responsible for this dissemination, and how it
actually occurs.
The FBI and DOJ policies for disseminating other raw collection data, such as
foreign language documents, who is responsible for this dissemination, and how it
actually occurs.
Analysis:
The role of the FBI HQ analysts; the role of the Field analysts.
The independence of the analytic entities from the operational elements, and their
ability to produce independent analytic judgments.
How strategic and tactical analytic priorities and established and implemented.
The FBI's ability to "mine" the data in its possession, and the use and
effectiveness of analytic software.
The FBI's ability to produce meaningful strategic analytic products to inform its
executives, foreign governments, the Intelligence Community, local/state law
enforcement, and the national policymakers.
Possible interviews: FBI field and HQ analysts and analytic managers, Office of
of Intelligence personnel, operational managers, field agents and supervisors,
"customers" from other agencies receiving FBI analytic products.
The focus of the FBI Legal Attaches on counterterrorism matters, and their role in
the counterterrorism arena.
The FBI Legal Attaches' relationship with both their foreign law enforcement and
intelligence counterparts.
The FBI Legal Attaches' relationship with the CIA Stations and the Ambassadors.
The Legats' ability to adequately cover the countries for which they are
responsible.
Possible documents: MLATs, MOUs with CIA and State Department, FBI
Inspection documents.
The effectiveness of the FBI's efforts to disseminate warnings and other relevant
information about possible terrorist activity to state/local law enforcement.
The extent to which the FBI and state/local have access to each others'
information databases.
The FBI's ability to effectively task state/local law enforcement for relevant
information.
The process through which the FBI tasks other federal agencies for terrorist-
related information.
The process through which the FBI responds to requests for information from
other federal agencies.
The role/coverage of detailees from the FBI to other federal agencies (and vice-
versa) and their ability to provide adequate coverage.
What legal authorities a newly created domestic intelligence agency would need
to adequately investigate international terrorist activity.
The relationship between a newly created domestic intelligence agency and the
Intelligence Community.
How the newly created domestic intelligence agency would go about collecting,
processing, analyzing and dissemination intelligence collected about possible
terrorist activity, and whether this would remedy systemic problems with the
current system.
10
Mail:: INBOX: Doc Requests Page 1 of 1
As requested here's the status of doc requests in case your are asked where
w e ' r e at.
DOJ #9:
Faith Burton said (last Thursday) they sent 1,000 pages responsive to our
request (no. 9-item 1). She has a small batch related to item 5 which she'll
be sending over this week.
FBI #9:
Spoke with Pat O'Brien this a.m. and I told him we recieved the doc. regarding
Mueller's briefings. He is still waiting for doc's to arrive from their
archives. Once recieved, they will review for responsiveness/classification
and then send our way. However, this may not be for a few weeks (at the very
least 2 weeks before we start seeing things). He was told by our F/0 to focus
on doc's related to the T6's ongoing field interviews and then concentrate on
T4's request. Looks like we are number 3 in line.
DoS #3:
Spoke with Jean McCray this a.m. as well. The doc's mentioned at last week's
meeting will be coming to us by week's end. It's mostly 7th Floor related--
and a lot of it (roughly 90,000 pages).
--S
http://kinesis.swishmail.com./webmail/imp/message.php?Horde=6e3f79a9fD2ffce501efa47a9... 8/13/03
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE
COPIES: 1 PAGES: 2
RESTRICTEDJ
The item identified below has been withdrawn from this file:
FROM:
TO:
WITHDRAWAL NOTICE