Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Hidden talents
Optimising investments in talent management
ADVISORY
In our view, current talent management approaches often leave organisations struggling to identify the value of talent management. To help organisations get the most from their talent spend, we propose a new approach which involves identifying those roles within an organisation that deliver disproportionate value.
Organisations currently face a false dichotomy when thinking about how to manage and develop talented people. They either choose to focus exclusively on their high potential employees, however defined, or take the option of treating everyone as talent.
These two most common approaches to talent management have a number of flaws. High potential populations (or HiPos) are most frequently defined as graduate recruits, those with the potential to progress quickly to senior roles, and/or incumbent senior cadres of leadership. But focussing on these groups often creates problems such as how to identify and select people with potential. Organisations often have difficulty defining high potential, in many cases selecting high performing individuals instead. This approach does not necessarily guarantee investment in those roles that deliver most value. Without gathering evidence of the value that these populations deliver to the organisation, it is difficult to prove if the talent initiatives aimed at them are providing tangible benefits to the organisation. In addition, if organisations assume that these definitions of talent will stand the test of time, there is potential danger that talent initiatives will become irrelevant over time, losing touch with the changing needs and priorities of the organisation. The alternative treat everyone as talent approach also has inherent drawbacks. The reality is that some roles will need more targeted, specific support than others. Our view is that whilst Learning and Development opportunities should be available for all to enable maximum productivity across the organisation, talent spend should be more carefully targeted if it is to deliver real value for money. In a recent KPMG survey1 of HR and Talent Directors, many reported that they did not find it easy to justify their desired levels of talent spending in terms of business benefits, and were also hard pressed to capture the real costs of existing talent activities across their organisations.
Understand and optimise talent spend Ensuring that talent spend guarantees the best return on investment. Benchmarking data is useful but HR professionals need to ensure that they are distributing talent funds according to a rigorous, evidenced-based approach, fine tuned for their own organisation.
Identify and target spend on critical roles Talent activities should be geared to specific, clearly identified, critical roles. Ideally Learning and Development activities should support all roles in an organisation. But companies must realise that heavy talent investment on individuals whose roles do not add disproportionate value to the organisation is likely to be money, time and effort wasted.
Translate these critical roles into high value career paths to ensure the strategic goals of the organisation are met Talent processes and programmes need to be highly flexible, readily adaptable to changing market conditions and business needs. Definitions of talent pools and skill-sets should be regularly challenged. Organisations should identify specific trigger and transition points for changing their focus and the processes put in place to develop and support talent should be flexible enough to accommodate changes quickly.
Talent is not a fixed commodity that thrives in any environment; organisations need to build the right talent support infrastructure so that individuals have the back up to grow into and thrive in critical roles.
In recent conversations with clients, many attest that it is often hard to keep track of talent initiatives across the whole organisation, let alone identify and understand the real cost of investment in talent. Our experience shows that savings can be made that will not significantly
impact the level or effectiveness of talent initiatives. Recent work we have conducted with two large, multi-national telecommunications companies has, for example, shown us that savings can be made through understanding all the talent and learning development activities that are going on across the organisation, and taking
a few steps to minimise duplicated spend and inefficient use of suppliers. Once an organisation has a clear understanding of the costs and benefits of its investment in talent, it is then in a position to identify ways to achieve the same outcomes for less.
2. CIPD Hot Topic Report The war on talent? Talent management under threat in uncertain times. 13th February 2009 3. Ignites Downturn Squeezes HR, Putting Pressure on Talent Management. 24th August 2009
One important step companies can take is to assess talent as a critical investment issue, subject to the same rigorous analysis as other key items of business spending. HR and procurement professionals work closely together to ensure investment is both cost effective and strategically beneficial. As well as considering cost optimisation approaches, rethinking how talent initiatives are delivered is another way to achieve significant cost savings, without compromising outcomes.
We have seen a recent decline in numbers of talent populations being supported through formal academic qualifications traditionally, MBAs or technically focused Masters qualifications. This approach is increasingly being replaced by internally developed accreditation schemes, such as Hewlett Packards HP Masters (in Business Change). Such schemes enable the organisation to deliver learning objectives in-house and have their work based learning programmes accredited as externally recognised academic qualifications.
The underlying principle behind such schemes is that organisations get a clear line of sight on the return on their investment. They are dictating the learning objectives and outcomes and can link this directly to organisational strategy. They see this as preferable to the traditional approach, where HiPos are sent at great cost to prestigious institutions to study postgraduate qualifications, which are geared towards the employee rather than offering significant value to the organisation.
The accurate identification of critical roles within an organisation those that add disproportionate value to the organisation is paramount in executing an effective talent management strategy. Only by understanding which roles tangibly and directly affect the performance of a business can an organisation really target talent initiatives properly and achieve real value for money. Organisations often misuse money, resources and time in developing roles in an ad hoc way, or by assuming that senior roles are the most critical and therefore have most impact on the business.
Whilst the development of leadership talent is important, there may be other, less obvious roles which provide a much greater return on talent investment. Closer examination with clients has revealed that the critical roles delivering real value in an organisation repeat custom, for example can lie in very different parts of the business and often much further down the managerial chain. Our critical roles approach to defining and identifying talent pools starts with understanding the organisations strategy, key drivers and value chain. This methodology takes a top down approach. It starts with a decomposition
of the organisations operating model and strategic focus to understand how the organisation is made up and arranged in order to achieve that focus. Next, the analysis focuses on identifying roles which perform a critical brokerage role in the organisation those roles that ultimately provide the cohesion and linkage between the most important aspects of the business. A further activity-based analysis can be undertaken on these roles if necessary, in order to identify accurately critical roles that truly help the business to achieve its strategic focus.
Lastly, the methodology involves comparing current talent development investment against identified critical roles to determine whether the organisation is developing the right talent. We recently had experience with a global drinks company where we carried out a detailed review of their value chain. It was apparent from this analysis, that the critical role in adding value was the commodity purchaser, but their talent proposition focussed on the top 100 only. People management policies were therefore changed to focus investment in this key role.
Role focus
Activity focus
1 2 3 4 5
1. Form a group of Subject Matter Experts (SMEs those with experience of working in critical roles) and discuss their career aspirations and career history to distil key themes of how individuals currently move through critical roles in the organisation 2. Design and hold a talent-focussed scenario planning Accelerated Solution Design event, identifying the future strategic targets of the organisation as well as the drivers and trends that the organisation may face and determine the potential impact that this may have on the organisations critical roles
3. Identify the critical roles that are enduring in the organisation as well as those that may eventually be redundant and determine the trigger points that may result in this shift in focus and talent investment 4. Develop the critical role development proposition from an employee and employer perspective so that individuals can understand what the organisation will provide them with and what their role is in developing their career
5. Outline example top-down and bottom-up career pathways with a focus on how critical roles can and should progress across the organisation. If possible, illustrate the generic guidance with real-life examples of different career paths in the organisation.
Are cross-functional, multi-national or even external moves outside the organisation necessary? This approach can be used to help organisations make difficult decisions regarding their talent in a variety of situations. For example, we have supported a nuclear provider through the transition to decommissioning. Working with them we helped identify the critical roles, as a result of this change in focus, as well as how to migrate existing members of the workforce into these new roles to deliver the revised strategy.
Armed with realistic data on the cost involved in different talent activities, and a detailed understanding of the requirements of critical roles, these decisions become simpler to make and to justify. A case in point, we helped develop career pathways for the roles within two functions of a global pharmaceuticals organisation, to provide the infrastructure for a more agile and flexible workforce. Using a highly collaborative approach, we held a number of interviews with representatives from across the
organisation and conducted extensive research on leading practice to develop the output. We enabled professionals to take ownership of their career development through a combination of planned career moves and developmental activities and prevented silos being created by supporting movement through and between different functions in the organisation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we believe that if talent management initiatives are properly designed to support the strategic goals of the organisation by focusing on critical roles and on delivering tangible returns to the business they can deliver a real competitive advantage in the short and longer-term. KPMG has developed a three phase methodology to enable organisations to implement this new approach to talent management by understanding and optimising spend, identifying and targeting spend on critical roles and creating long term high value career paths. The purpose of this methodology is to enable organisations to gather the evidence and data needed to make informed, robust decisions about talent management practices rather than relying on conventional wisdom or generic approaches. It is our view that talent management in the current environment requires a more selective approach to talent management. This approach needs to be based on clear evidence of which roles will add most value to the organisation and which are most likely to help the organisation achieve its strategic goals.
kpmg.co.uk
KPMG has, for the second year in a row, been named The Sunday Times Best Big Company to Work For. KPMG has also been awarded a Lifetime Achievement Award in honour of our outstanding performance in the competition over the last five years.
Key Contacts KPMG in the UK Mark Spears Head of People & Change Europe +44 (0) 7789 634 600 mark.spears@kpmg.co.uk Mark Williamson Head of People and Change UK and Corporates +44 (0) 7767 345 602 mark.williamson@kpmg.co.uk Rosemary Scully Infrastructure, Government and Healthcare +44 (0) 207 311 1516 rosemary.scully@kpmg.co.uk Tim Clayton-Ball Financial Services +44 (0) 207 694 2013 tim.clayton-ball@kpmg.co.uk KPMG in the Netherlands Henk Berg +31 (0) 653 867 600 berg.henk@kpmg.nl KPMG in Germany Andreas Reimann +49 (0) 1732 864 041 areimann@kpmg.com KPMG in Belgium Emmanuel De Moyer +32 (0) 2708 44 86 emmanuel.demoyer@kpmg.be KPMG in Spain Pilar Nieto +34 (0) 619 960 316 marianieto@kpmg.es
The information contained herein is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, there can be no guarantee that such information is accurate as of the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future. No one should act on such information without appropriate professional advice after a thorough examination of the particular situation.
2009 KPMG LLP , a UK limited liability partnership, is a subsidiary of KPMG Europe LLP and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. All rights reserved. Printed in the United Kingdom. KPMG and the KPMG logo are registered trademarks of KPMG International, a Swiss cooperative. Designed and produced by KPMGs LLP (UK)s Design Services Publication name: Hidden talents Optimising investments in talent management Publication number: RRD-161020 Publication date: September 2009 Printed on recycled material.