Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
and two smaller ones. The three major assessments were on the binomial expansion and combinatorics (40/40; A+), on sequences and series (43/44; A+), and on a smattering of review material involving functions (37/46, B-). On the smaller assessments, Stu earned 19/20 (A) on sequences and series, and 7/10 (C-) on function basics and transformations. What these scores show is that Stu has a very solid understanding of the material being presented and although he didnt perform up to his standards on the functions basic/review material, he is doing a very good job with the new material. The material in this course is often challenging, and the level of understanding that students are expected to have is substantial. Stu has risen to the challenge and I am very proud of his work. I only hope that his great work continues as the year progresses. Additionally, the nightly work assigned to students was checked a number of times sometimes being checked for completion, but often collected and marked for correctness and for explanations. (For these formal write-ups that are handed in, students are asked to explain their work and thought processes, not just provide the answers.) Stu always had his work, but seriously struggled with the formal write-ups. He struggled in showing and explaining his work. One common refrain in my feedback is explain! One of the points of the formal writeups is to help students learn to communicate math and based on his assessments which have a lot of explain this problems, it is clear he has this ability. If Stu needs guidance on what is expected on these formal writeups, I entreat him to meet with me. Otherwise, I hope he makes a goal of improving his nightly work in the future. He earned a C+ for his nightly work. In Stus group, there were two very active participants, and one much more passive member. Although I went over to the group to encourage more communication among all three participants, this didnt always happen. I think that sometimes something as simple as switching the seating arrangement so the more quiet members of the group sit in between the more vocal participants can help (and I suggested that). However, the dynamic never really changed. This group lost a group member who switched classes, near the end of their work together. Thus, the group of three went to a group of two. Stu is a student who has a number of ah ha moments, and his insights are valuable to his group. He sees his role in the group as a problem solver, always questioning the solutions that the group generates but also ensuring that the solution we have come up with makes both mathematical and logical sense. I have seen that and the animated discussions he has with [another student] are wonderful to be witness to. There is a tenacity that characterizes the group when it comes to solving problems. They dont give up and they dont ask for help unless they truly have exhausted their options. As I mentioned, there was one group member that was more passive. I think the group should have slowed down a bit to make sure everyone was on the same page. A group should be working for a common understanding, rather than three individuals working for their own understanding. Their approach to working together is to work individually, and after some time, compare their work. That may work well for some groups, but the end result of this approach for this group was that two members were able to start and work through the problems, while one group member passively waited. Instead, talking through the problems and throwing out ideas of how to attach them initially, and then having some time to individually work through things, might have benefited everyone in the group. Stu noted that he might have pushed the more passive member to join in the conversation knowing that she might need a little more support to fully understand things. That would have been a good idea, as well as talking explicitly about the group dynamic, and how it could be improved. Often, a short discussion initiated by one of the group members can
totally change how a group works together. (Im always happy to facilitate this also.) He earned a B for groupwork. In a reflection I had students write near the end of the quarter, Stu wrote: I think that the class is going pretty well. I really like the people in the class and feel that we are all at around the same level of understanding The pace of the class, although fast, is almost perfect. It pushes me and doesnt let me slack off by being too slow but doesnt leave me in the dust by going too fast The difficulty and pacing put together make the class challenging but I enjoy it since it keeps me academically stimulated and never bores me. I loved reading that! He also mentioned that he was proud of how his groups work improved through the quarter starting out divided, but getting a bit better. Finally, he mentioned that sometimes the length of assessments can be a bit long. I want him to know I will take this to heart when writing assessments. Thank you for that feedback. Stus final quarter grade is 88.5%, which is a B+.
INTRODUCTORY BOILERPLATE FOR THE COURSE Advanced Precalculus is a fast-paced course which covers a variety of math topics, most of which are essential prerequisites to Calculus. We began the year with an investigation into Combinatorics, the way we count in mathematics. The next unit dealt with sequences and series. Our third unit was a comprehensive review of linear and quadratic functions and their graphs. We studied parent functions and the graphs of their transformations and we investigated properties of functions including symmetry, maxima and minima and behavior over intervals. During the second quarter we will be studying analytic trigonometry, polar coordinates and vectors. Most notably, this course has two main features. First, students work primarily in groups. Although we will often come together as a class, most of the heavy lifting is done by students working collectively. Second, students arent given formulas but are asked to build them up themselves so they really understand where they come from and what they mean. I have been especially proud of the fact that students have constructed all the formulas that weve used thus far in the course. A students grade is calculated as follows: 75% assessments, 15% nightly work, and 10% groupwork.
and wake up class because I was in serious denial. I became more on top of things. However, I had to dig myself out of a huge hole that I put myself in, but eventually the rhythm has become one that I used to. And Im almost in a weird way glad that I learned the hard way because now I truly understand Math. -I cant say how happy I was to read this. I hope to teach my students independence and how to be proactive learners. Stu is learning this. Stus final grade for the quarter is an 84%. Stu, the glee on your face when I told you in the commons that the last minute reassessments were successful that was amazing. You dug a hole, but you also worked hard to come out of that hole. Now Id like to see you work hard on keeping your level of understanding consistently up so that that smile on your face doesnt ever leave.