"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for

custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

Attorney Jeff Sherter

California Attorney Guidelines of Civility and Professionalism

As officers of the court with responsibilities to the administration of justice, attorneys have an obligation to be professional with clients, other parties and counsel, the courts and the public. This obligation includes civility, professional integrity, personal dignity, candor, diligence, respect, courtesy, and cooperation, all of which are essential to the fair administration of justice and conflict resolution resolution.In 2010 in a TMZ article on Jermaine Jackson respondents a attorney Jeff Sherter was quoted stating: ..the ..the TMZ article is a selective report of pleadings that misrepresent the proceedings, facts and final outcomes of the case and should not be considered or evaluated in the context of isolated court papers reflecting only one snapshot of a one-sided sided and inaccurate portrayal that is part and parcel of nastiness that may overcome any litigation. Jermaine Jackson Slams TMZ Deadbeat Dad Claim - By : Nima - December 5, 2010 On Friday, TMZ released an article stating that Jermaine Jackson "owes so much in back child support his driver's license has been confiscated, and he's not no getting it back until he antes up around $100,000".Jermaine Jackson slammed back from Europe at TMZs web articles characterization of him as a deadbeat dad today and stated: "TMZ never gets it right, the media always pulls this kind of stuff when Im away, and I take care of my kids and my family. Jacksons family law attorney, Jeff Sherter, Esq., stated in response to the TMZ article: Jermaine does have his drivers license, he is a committed and devoted father, pays for his children's expensive private pr school and food, his ex-wife wife is moving from the Mansion to be put up in an upscale condo and not to the streets, and the TMZ article is a selective report of pleadings that misrepresent the proceedings, facts and final outcomes of the case and should not be considered or evaluated in the context of isolated court papers reflecting only one snapshot of a one one-sided sided and inaccurate portrayal that is part and parcel of nastiness that may overcome any litigation. - http://www.dubcnn.com/news/news-archive archive-12-2010 Attorney Sherters insight on how moving and prejudicial the nature of presentations of one sided and inaccurate portrayals that are part and parcel of nastiness in its ability to pollute a persons impartial view is a concise and exact understanding of the moving power of an attorney who intentionally misrepresents facts. This appears to be Jeff Sherter's highly polished legal strategy of choice even though it clearly violates the ethical guidelines established by the bar, and should only serve to elevate ethical concerns regarding the professional conduct duct of this attorney. - IMO-HE IS A LIAR. Unconscionable Attorney Behavior An attorney should not engage in conduct that is unbecoming a member of the Bar and an officer of the court. For example, in communications with adversaries an attorney should not disparage the intelligence, integrity, ethics, morals or behavior of the cou court rt or other counsel, parties or participants when those characteristics are not at issue. f.) An attorney should avoid hostile, demeaning or humiliating words. (Guidelines, supra, 4, pp. 4 4-5.)

I contend that there are multiple fraudulent violations and this case must be reset
"The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

A man at a bar stands and proclaims: "All Lawyers are ASSHOLES! Another man at the fro front of the bar replies: "Hey! I resent that!" So the first man asks, "Why, are you a lawyer?" "HELL HELL NO! NO!.... I'm an asshole "

Jeff Sherter ..." you are both.."

a and a fucking liar too....

Justice King's remarks in In re Marriage of Fini, supra, 26 Cal.App.4th 1033, emphasizes the relationship between the perception of fairness and the legitimacy of the justice system which produces the child support order: "This would not only make it more likely that the order will be complied with, but it would eliminate the amount ordered for child support as a source of ongoing conflict between the parents, the fallout ...... is clearly harmful to the child."
"The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

" This case appears to have followed the all-too-common pattern in family law of lawyers disappearing into a judge's chamber and emerging with the judge's order order, independent of any hearing or settlement. ...child support orders must be seen by each parent as the result of a fair and reasonable process, not an arbitrary decision done in a corner.

Elkins Commission
Eighty percent of family law cases have at least one unrepresented party by the time of disposition. ( Task Force on Self Self-Represented Litigants, supra note 9, at 2) ).
In "The Final Recommendations" the Task Force designed to increase efficiency and ensure due process. These are the ideas that manifest, in the view of the Task Force, a fair, just, and effective system that deserves the trust and confidence of those who use it. 1. Courts will ensure consistent and timely access to equal justice for all individuals, families, and children in family law proceedings. 2. Statutes, rules, procedures, and practices will protect procedural fairness and the due process rights of parties as well as seek to increase efficiency, effectiveness, consistency, and understandability. Simplification must not diminish due process rights. Task force recommendations will be evaluated for their potential impact on due process, fairness, and effective and timely access. 5. The task force is aware of the unique opportunity to make far-reaching, reaching, positive changes in family law. The task force is mindful of the long long-term term impact of family law on individuals, families, children, and society. - IT HAS FAILED !! 7. Enhancing the status of, and respect for, family law litigants and the family law process. " Public confidence is essential to the viability of the le legal process; courts must earn the public's trust, and the procedures they employ must deserve it. [F]amily law litigants should not be subjected to second-class class status or deprived of access to justice justice. Litigants with other civil claims are entitled to resolve their disputes in the usual adversary trial proceeding governed by the rules of evidence established by statute." Cal. Atty. Guidelines of Civility & Professionalism 19 19- In family law proceedings eedings an attorney should seek to reduce emotional tension and trauma and encourage the parties and attorneys to interact in a cooperative atmosphere, and keep the best interest of the children in mind']." These guidelines reflect that attorneys have an obligation to be professional with . . . other parties and counsel, [and] the courts, which obligation includes civility, professional integrity, . . . candor . . . and cooperation, all of which are essential to the fair administration of justice and conflict resolution. (Guidelines, supra, Introduction, p. 3.) These attacks by Sherter are designed to attack a loving father in court attempting to provide a stable environment and protect and his children from all abuses and provoke a response tha that t he can point to and manipulate the court with while claiming the victimization of the abusive abandoning parent. His obvious misdirection of material facts are key as intended to lead the court to an unjust decision that can only serve to destroy the lives of the children the subject to the proceeding proceeding.

"The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

CONDUCT FOUL - Jeff Sherter

SECTION 4 - An attorneys communications about the legal system should at all times reflect civility, professional integrity, personal dignity, and respect for the legal system. system .."...An attorney should not engage in conduct that is unbecoming a member of the Bar and an officer of the court."
g. An attorney should not create a false or misleading record of events or attribute to an opposing counsel a position not taken. Jeff Sherter is a not a Ethical Lawyer Lawyer... he is an Unethical "Lie-yer" "Lie
1/26/2012 Pg. 22

" Rights" then This is not the discussion I was informed about after being left in the hallway of "Lost billed $1400 or 2x the support I would actually receive during another the continuance....for continuance.... absolutely no reason. Because my attorney says.. this happened "in chambers".....

"MISSING MISSING CRITICAL INFORMATION" for CHILD SUPPORT

. What CONFERENCE did Shitner attend ?? He H seems to have left Not even close to the same story.... his "Candor" there and failed to mention the revelation of the $4050 /mo his client actually made on her Sept 2nd paystub she received 4 days before she committed perjury and claimed $2300 2300/mo. . "The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

What critical information was missing ?? The" In Contempt" non-supporting/ supporting/ non custodial parent who's 2009 taxes showed head of household hous , and +40K income and a $7K tax benefit for the kids

"The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

Her taxes two years earlier don't reflect

Once again the evil of the "Chambers Conference" raises its head ... as the truth is raped again.

Yes.... ASSHOLE... I DID....

In Fact "Cameron Astiazaran" told me this ....

"The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

1) The Profit and Loss was in the court record however what was missing was the Sept 2nd 2 paystub th Sherter shared on November 9 that proved that on Sept 2nd her YTD was $32,200 2) "The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

3) **correction ** THE PETITIONER : THERE HAS NOT !!! 4) This Discovery claim is BULLSHIT BULLSHIT, Sherter served absolutely NOTHING, and the P& L is in the record On that note ...who the F do think you are talking to... ?? Guidelines Section 4: ".....an attorney should avoid, hostile, demeaning or humiliating words" See Fam. C. 2100 (b), 271(a) (sanctions anctions for uncoo uncooperative perative conduct in family law cases); cases) Linguistics expert Dr. Michael Porter states: Chomping at the bit is in fact incorrect...the correct phrase is Champing at the bit . To champ is to do a repetitious, powerful opening and closing of the mouth that produces sounds when the teeth hit together. Champing in swine may be a threat signal, but also is performed by boars during courtship and mating.Definition from Hurnik et al., 1995. I dont speak swine however what is crystal clear is attorney Jeff Shitter is quite fluent in the language of BULLSHIT. This is a " "court of truth"... and the truth is the one champing is the one "champing" bullshit in his flagrant misrepresentations of the proceedings and facts through a series of lies told in his "inaccurate inaccurate portrayal of facts that is part and parcel of the nastiness that overcame this litigation"
Some courts have said the section authorizes attorneys fees and costs as a penalty for obstreperous conduct. (Robert J. v. Catherine D. (2009) 171 Cal.App.4th 1500, 1520; In re Marriage of Freeman, supra, 132 Cal.App.4th at p. 6.)

The fact that my children are losing their home isn't the reason he is an "asshole". I would have respected Jeff Sherter if he was vigorously protecting the legal interest of his client with the depth of his legal expertise and the results were because she was such a good liar that she confused the court. The court is confused because it viola violated my "right to be heard" and because Judicial officers give undue weight to the words that come from the mouth mouths of attorneys... as if a "ethical attorney" was the norm instead of being dangerously close to being an oxymoron. The reason my children have lost their home is because lawyers lie... REGULARLY Jeff Sherter is a Lie-yer ... The P/L was in the IN the Court Record and in fact he had seen it This asshole - a'la cart sent absolutely nothing... his ignorant, lying, deceitful client-in-contempt client DID ... She served "Gracie Peters" " at my former attorney's 's office the way she does everything else in her life for the last 7yrs.. in a way that always creates extra work, drama and problems. The former attorney that continuances due to his lying client used up $4700 and received only $1047 1047 in the previous 7mo. Because I have never been in chambers and both attorneys are documented liars I no longer care what Shetner says or what he and m my ex-attorney conspired to in chambers. I had no part of it and it was a breach of fiduciary duty. I will never trust an another attorney to go to chambers again

Specifically . Starting at Pg 20 - Transcripts

"The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

To clarify: This is a lie. November 2011 appearance was continued because DCSS failed to respond and (according to my attorney) Commissioner Veasey simply refused to address I was getting only $95 support checks and no explanation. - HOW SHOULD I SUPPORT MY KIDS ?

Mr. Sherter in his part-time time role as attorney states the following lies. 1) He didnt have a profit and loss yet it is in the court record. We had no information but it was in record. I have brought bank statements and credit card since Septemb September 6th and the P&L was still within the 3 mo. window in January. We had no information is what he tells the court yet he claims he reviewed the P/L that doesnt make sense ? no critical information missing 2) We sent discovery who is we ? I have never been served discovery. is this personal knowledge ? Is Mr Sherter resp responsible for the negligence since testifying for we to facts about my compliance failure. Mr. Sherter er has wasted court time with poor case management and irresponsible accusations presented as facts are unprofessional and untrue.

"The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

My EX-LAWYER RESPONDED AND the complaining WE DID HER USUAL NOTHING

Mr Sherters We sent discovery documents to someone I dont know to the attorney I dont have and failed his duty to follow low up on his limited scope duty before making wide scope accusations, claims, and insults. 1) Gracie Peters and her Attorneys were served in my case to a lawyer I dont have. This discovery is being used as a tactic to delay the legal process. Its cumberso cumbersome me and being used to see if I will fail the discovery requirements and loose access to attorney fees. It has no substantive value and I suspect it seeks to find the imaginary trust that Dianne believes makes money out of thin air. I have been told that I dont ont have to pay rent because my trust pays it.

"The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

. I had expected her to be punished for being in contempt and not paying anything for months, nor providing any care... not me for being the responsible parent, providing for all needs and in compliance.

"The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010

"It It is at least as important that courts employ fair proceedings when the stakes involve a judgment providing for custody in the best interest of a child and governing a parent's future involvement in his or her child's life life, dividing all of a family's assets, or determining levels of spousal and child support

"The mission of our justice system is to provide timely access to fair and consistent justice. justice
The true message of Elkins is that, to do so, the participants in the justice system must evaluate it in a thoughtful and critical manner to identify what works well and where the system is falling short." ELKINS COMMISSION- 2010