0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
114 visualizzazioni4 pagine
Spur gears are normally used in every field of
engineering where the power transmission is required at moderate speed. The study in this paper shows that the complex design problem of spur gear which requires fine software skill for modelling and also for analysing. The above problem can be
resolved by using MATLAB Simulink which provide equivalent results to the AGMA and also to the ANSYS. In this paper we first modelled spur gear in Pro engineer wildfire 5.0 and then calculated the stresses on ANSYS work bench. After that we
create a Simulink model using curve fitting equation. The results are compared with both AGMA and ANSYS.
Titolo originale
Comparison of bending stresses for different number of teeth of spur gear obtained using MATLAB Simulink with AGMA and ANSYS
Spur gears are normally used in every field of
engineering where the power transmission is required at moderate speed. The study in this paper shows that the complex design problem of spur gear which requires fine software skill for modelling and also for analysing. The above problem can be
resolved by using MATLAB Simulink which provide equivalent results to the AGMA and also to the ANSYS. In this paper we first modelled spur gear in Pro engineer wildfire 5.0 and then calculated the stresses on ANSYS work bench. After that we
create a Simulink model using curve fitting equation. The results are compared with both AGMA and ANSYS.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Spur gears are normally used in every field of
engineering where the power transmission is required at moderate speed. The study in this paper shows that the complex design problem of spur gear which requires fine software skill for modelling and also for analysing. The above problem can be
resolved by using MATLAB Simulink which provide equivalent results to the AGMA and also to the ANSYS. In this paper we first modelled spur gear in Pro engineer wildfire 5.0 and then calculated the stresses on ANSYS work bench. After that we
create a Simulink model using curve fitting equation. The results are compared with both AGMA and ANSYS.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
Comparison of bending stresses for different number of teeth of spur gear obtained using MATLAB Simulink with AGMA and ANSYS Ishan Patel 1 , Dr. M.S. Murthy 2
1 PG Scholar, Mechanical Engineering, Indore Institute of Science and technology, Indore, India 2 Professor, Mechanical Engineering, Indore Institute of Science and technology, Indore, India
Abstract Spur gears are normally used in every field of engineering where the power transmission is required at moderate speed. The study in this paper shows that the complex design problem of spur gear which requires fine software skill for modelling and also for analysing. The above problem can be resolved by using MATLAB Simulink which provide equivalent results to the AGMA and also to the ANSYS. In this paper we first modelled spur gear in Pro engineer wildfire 5.0 and then calculated the stresses on ANSYS work bench. After that we create a Simulink model using curve fitting equation. The results are compared with both AGMA and ANSYS.
Keywords Spur gear, Modelling, AGMA, curve fitting, simulink. I. INTRODUCTION The overall efficiency of any kind of power transmission machine depends on the amount of power loss in the process. The best way of transmitting power between the shafts is gears. Gears are mostly used to transmit torque and angular velocity. The design of gear is a complex process generally it needs large number of iteration and data sets. In many cases gear design is traditional and specified by different types of standards [1], [2]. Involute shaped gears found to be almost everywhere because of the contact forces act along a straight line. The Simulink model in this work was created for two main reasons. First of all, the MATLAB Simulink model was constructed to allow Ansys users to theoretically predict the response of the analysis Software whatever that may be. Instead of going through number of iterations and various typical design processes of the gear analysis the Simulink program allows the user to predict the response of the system without actually doing the Analysis on the intend gear. Senthil Kumar, Muni, and Muthuveerappan [3] carried out work on optimization of asymmetric spur gear drives to improve the bending load capacity. Yong Wang [4] in his work optimized tooth profile based on identified gear dynamic model has suggested a method to determine the dynamic model of a practical gear system. Costopoulos and Spitas [5] in their research studied the reduction of gear fillet stresses by using one-sided involute asymmetric teeth. Li[6] in his work effect of addendumon contact strength, bending strength and basic performance parameters of a pair of spur gears obtained basic performance parameters, effect of addendumon tooth contact strength and bending strength of the spur gear. S. T.Yusuf et.al [7] in their work simplified model of a DC rotating machine for mechanical energy generation using MATLAB/Simulink presents a study of a simplified model of MATLAB/Simulink on DC rotating machine on the place of complex mathematical model. They have discussed in detailed simulation results and analysis. A A Ansari, D M Deshpande [8] in their work mathematical model of asynchronous machine in MATLAB Simulink exhibit the steady state performance of induction motor in MATLAB program. They have modelled and also simulated with SIMULINK model.
II. MODELLING OF GEAR In total 15 numbers of gears are modelled in Pro/ENGINEER Wildfire [9], which are having the following parameters. Material of gear is taken structural steel
TABLE I Description Specifications No . of teeth (Z) 20 Module(m) 10 mm Pitch Circle Diameter(D) 200 mm Gear face width (b) 50 mm Pressure angle() 20 Helix angle () 0 Addendum(ha) 10 mm Dedendum(hf) 1.157*m Modulus of Elasticity 2E+05 MPa Poissons ratio 0.3 the procedure to model the gear of 20 number of teeth with the parameters above mentioned in the Pro-E Wildfire, other set of gears are modelled in the same way. Part parameters are the basic parameters which defining the gear, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) - Volume4 Issue7- July 2013
these part parameters determine all the other parameters that define the gear tooth profile by using the Tools/Relation menu. Figure 1 show the part parameters.
Fig. 1 Tools / Relation Menu
III. STRESS CALCULATION All the calculations are carried out of Eq. (1) on the basis of AGMA standards. A. AGMA Stress calculation [10] Bending stress () = Ptpdks km ku b]k (1) Where Diametral pitch (P d ) = Pd = Z D (2) (P d )=0.1 Application Factor (K a )
= 1.2 Size Factor (K s ) = 1 Load distribution Factor (K m )
= 1.2 Dynamic Factor (K v ) = 0.8 Normal tangential Load (F t ) =1424.75 N Geometry Factor (y j ) = 0.4
Tangential force calculation: Power (P) =15 HP=11.190 Kw Speed =750 R.P.M Torque (T p ) = 9549.3P(Kw) spccd(RPM) =142.47 N-m Tangential Force (F t ) = 20001p Ptch dumctc =1424.75 N
Agma = 1424.7511.21.250.1 500.40.8 =13.35 MPa
B: Static structural Analysis The structural analysis of the spur gear tooth model is carried out using the finite element analysis in ANSYS 14.5. The load applied at the highest point of single tooth contact. The Mess is generated with tetrahedron nodes. Figure 2, is showing mesh generation. Maximumelement size of 5 mmis selected for the Mess Control. By applying the analysis over the tooth which is facing the load we get the stress distribution in the numeric as well as in the formof colour scheme. By varying the number of teeth and keeping the other parameters constant various models of the spur gear are created. Various models created by varying number of teeth are shown in Figure 3 and figure 4, and these figures also show the finite element analysis.
Fig. 2 Meshed 3-D Model of Spur gear
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) - Volume4 Issue7- July 2013
For calculation of bending stresses in MATLAB-Simulink a equation of curve fitting is formed by the data of ANSYS. By making program coding on MATLAB then the solution is done and results are shown in TABLE II. Figure 5 shows the Simulink GUI window which give bending stress data.
Fig. 5 GUI Interface of MATLAB Simulink
IV. RESULT & DISCUSSION
TABLE III Bending Stress in MPa
Table II clearly shows the results of changing the number of teeth from15 to 25, the stress is continuously increasing. For constant load and speed the minimumnumber of teeth gears are suitable. The result table shows that the results of AGMA S. No No. Of Teeth ANSYS AGMA Simulink 1 15 10.77 10.017 10.49 2 16 10.49 10.68 10.95 3 17 11.53 11.35 11.46 4 18 12.23 12.02 12 5 19 12.38 12.68 12.59 6 20 13.445 13.35 13.22 7 21 13.4991 14.02 13.89 8 22 14.7 14.69 14.6 9 23 15.407 15.36 15.35 10 24 16.59 16.028 16.14 11 25 16.637 16.69 16.98 International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) - Volume4 Issue7- July 2013
and Simulink are much closer than results of ANSYS. Figure 6 shows the relation between number of teeth and bending stress and also it shows the comparison of results obtained through AGMA and ANSYS.
Fig. 6 Bending stress AGMA- ANSYS . Figure 7 is discussed the relation between number of teeth and bending stress and also it shows the comparison of results obtained through AGMA and Simulink.
Fig. 7 Bending stress AGMA-Simulink Figure 8 is discussed the relation between number of teeth and bending stress and also it shows the comparison of results obtained through AGMA-Simulink and ANSYS.
Fig. 8 Bending stress AGMA-ANSYS-Simulink
IV: Conclusions:
The trend results obtained fromboth ANSYS and Simulink are close to the results of AGMA. Which concludes that simulink is also an equivalent tool if modeled properly by using curve fitting. REFERENCES [1] Vasilios Spitas, et.al, Fast modelling of conjugate gear tooth profiles using discrete presentation by involute segments, Mechanism and Machine Theory 42 (2007) 751762. [2] V. B. Math, Satish Chand, An Approach to the Determination of Spur Gear Tooth Root Fillet, ASME 340 Vol. 126, MARCH 2004. [3] Senthil Kumar, D.V.Muni,G.Muthuveerappan, Profile modification, a design approach for increasing the tooth strength in spur gear, Mechanism and Machine Theory 43 (2008) 829858. [4] Yong Wang, Optimized tooth profile based on identified gear dynamic model, Mechanism and Machine Theory 42 (2007) 1058 1068. [5] Th. Costopoulos, V. Spitas, Reduction of gear fillet stresses by using one-sided involute asymmetric teeth, Int Mechanism and Machine Theory 44 (2009) 15241534. [6] Shuting Li, Effect of addendum on contact strength, bending strength and basic performance parameters of a pair of spur gears, Mechanism and Machine Theory 43 (2008) 15571584. [7] T.Yusuf et.al, Simplified model of a DC rotating machine for mechanical energy generation using MATLAB/SIMULINK, International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology Vol. 2, Issue 6, Dec 2012. [8] A A Ansari, D M Deshpande, Mathematical Model of Asynchronous Machine in MATLAB Simulink, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 2(5), 2010, 1260-1267. [9] Pro/ENGINEER Wildfire 5.0 [10] Dudleys, Gear hand book 2nd ed, pp. 6.15-6.22
14 16 18 20 22 24 26 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 S t r e s s No of Teeth AGMA ANSYS 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 S t r e s s No of Teeth AGMA Simulink 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 S t r e s s No of Teeth ANSYS AGMA Simulink
Comparison of Stress Distribution Patterns Within Quadrangle, Hexagonal and Octagonal Impact Socket Drive Designs of A Torque Wrench Using Finite Element Analysis