Sei sulla pagina 1di 8

Growth trend in tractors industry

Source: CRISIL Research, Industry

1994-95 to 1998-1999: The removal of restrictions imposed on credit for farm mechanisation and adequate rainfall in 1993 resulted in high sales growth during 1994-95 and 1997-98. The rise in tractor sales was marginal in 1998-99 due to inadequate rainfall, higher food grain stocks with the Food Corporation of India (FCI), low procurement prices of the government, and the consequent low farm income. 1999-2000 to 2002-03: Following the trend of 1998-99, the rise in tractor sales was marginal in 1999-2000 owing to the reasons mentioned above. However, there was a steep decline in 2001-02 and 2002-03 with rising inventories at dealers. 2003-04 to 2008-09: Tractor sales recovered in 2003-04 and continued to rise till 2006-07, mainly due to a normal monsoon, rising custom-hiring income, easy availability of credit, strong exports and higher focus of players. In 200708 and 2008-09, tractor sales fell, due to tightening of credit by financial institutions and low rainfall. 2009-10 to 2011-12: After a steep fall over the previous 2 years, tractor sales recovered sharply in 2009-10, crossing the peak levels of 2006-07. It grew by 28 per cent (y-o-y), mainly due to easy availability of finance and increase in minimum support prices, coupled with a better monsoon. Tractor sales continued its growth trajectory of 23.8 per cent (y-o-y) in 2010-11 on account of persistent buoyant demand from the agriculture sector and commercial segment. For 2011-12, growth in tractor sales moderated to around 12 per cent (y-o-y) on account of the high base of the last 2 years, coupled with inadequate rainfall and declining prices of major crops since the second half of 2011-12.

Factors affecting demand for tractors


Demand for tractors is mainly driven by the farmer's ability to purchase a tractor and is affected both, directly and indirectly by a number of factors:

Irrigation intensity and monsoons


Irrigation plays a vital role in determining demand for tractors. A farmer will normally prefer to invest in costlier capital assets like tractors when he is sure of receiving the essentials for farming such as water supply. Irrigation intensity in India has improved by 5 per cent to around 45 per cent in last one decade. However, India continues to have lower intensity as compared to China, which has 52 per cent irrigation intensity. Hence, the dependence on monsoon for farming is relatively higher. Besides, continuous deficient monsoons also impact reservoir levels, which, in turn, affect irrigation intensity.

Landholding pattern
The average landholding size in India is very low, where around 60 per cent of total landholding size is less than 4 hectares of land. This has been a deterrent for tractor demand. Moreover, the average landholding size has been declining due to socioeconomic factors such as the breakup of joint families and the division of ancestral land into smaller portions. This has both, a positive and negative impact on demand for tractors. With the division of larger landholdings into smaller holdings, the number of tractors required is expected to rise. However, the purchase of a tractor would become uneconomical for small farmers due to a reduction in farm size (as a result of the sub-division of already small landholdings). But, with the proportion of landholdings below 2 hectares being very high, the consolidation of landholdings will drive demand in the long run.

Availability of credit
Commercial banks, regional rural banks and land development banks finance 85-90 per cent of the tractors purchased. The government's thrust on agri-financing has been supplementing demand for tractors. For e.g., the minimum landholding taken as mortgage for financing a tractor has come down to 2-4 acres from 8 acres a few years back. This, in turn, has increased the affordability of farmers.

Minimum support prices of food grains


The procurement prices announced by the government are based on the cost of agricultural inputs such as fertilisers, power, irrigation and seeds. Procurement prices affect the market price of food grains, as these prices are used as a base for calculating the market price of food grains. A change in the procurement prices of food grains directly affects the farmer's income, thereby affecting his ability to repay the principal amount and interest on the loan taken for the purchase of tractors. It also indirectly affects farm incomes.

Cropping pattern
Farmers are being encouraged and educated by state governments to improve farm productivity, and consequently increase their incomes. In order to improve farm productivity, farmers are practicing multiple cropping. Consequently, the use of tractors helps the farmer complete operations quickly, following which, he can move on to the second crop.

Increase in cash crop production


Extensive cultivation of cash crops has resulted in higher incomes for farmers. This, in turn, has resulted in an increase in demand for tractors. Over the years, the cultivation of cash crops has been rising in terms of the land area and the share of output.

Raw material continues to be the key cost parameter


Raw material is the key cost component of a tractor, accounting for 65-70 per cent of the total operating income. Other major costs include employee costs and selling expenses. The trend in employee cost varies for different players across the industry, whereas the selling cost, as a per cent of operating income, has increased over the past 5 years.

Cost structure of major tractor players

Players' operating profit margins

Raw material cost is the largest expense head for the tractor industry. Alloy steel and pig iron are the primary components, accounting for 75-80 per cent of the total raw material cost. Prices of pig iron and steel have been increasing over the last 2 years, impacting the operating margins of most players. Average prices of pig iron have increased by around 9 per cent in 2011-12 and those of steel prices have increased by around 3 per cent (y-oy). Both the prices have increased over the high base of last year.

Raw material cost as a percentage of net sales

14 states across 4 regions constitute bulk of demand for tractors


We have used the following structural parameters - tractor penetration, size of land holdings, irrigation intensity, cropping intensity and commercial usage - to analyse demand for tractors across 14 key states (ranked by sales volumes) in the 4 regions (North, South, East and West). These states constitute over 95 per cent of the domestic tractor demand.

Structure of CV industry

CV industry is oligopolistic in nature


The domestic CV industry is relatively concentrated with the top three players accounting for 88 per cent (in volume terms) as of 2011-12. Tata Motors continues to dominate the CV industry with nearly 60 per cent share, followed by Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M) with 18 per cent, and Ashok Leyland with 10 per cent. On the basis of usage, the industry can be broadly divided into two product segments, namely, goods vehicles (trucks) and passenger vehicles (buses). These can be further segmented on the basis of gross vehicle weight into light commercial vehicles (LCV) and medium and heavy commercial vehicles (MHCV).

CRISIL Research expects 9-11 per cent growth in the passenger vehicles segment, with utility vehicles growing by 15-17 per cent versus a 8-10 per cent growth in cars. We expect macroeconomic recovery and decline in petrol price to aid revival in small car sales. We expect utility vehicle sales to continue to

grow, led by new model launches. However, growth will be capped at 15-17 per cent on account of diesel price hikes. Long term growth prospects continue to remain healthy until 2017-18.

cars and UVs industry: CRISIL estimates installed capacities in the cars and UVs industry to grow by 760,000 units to 5.4 million units by 2012-13. While the top three carmakers are expected to contribute 35 per cent to the incremental capacity additions, the rest is expected to come from expansion by other players to cater to the domestic and export demand.

CV : Historically, the domestic CV industry has remained relatively concentrated with the top three players accounting for 87.8 per cent (in volume terms) as of 2009-10. As competition intensifies, in order to retain their market share, players are forming joint ventures with international companies for adopting new technology to manufacture upgraded trucks and buses.

Structure of CV industry

CV industry is oligopolistic in nature


The domestic CV industry is relatively concentrated with the top three players accounting for 88 per cent (in volume terms) as of 2011-12. Tata Motors continues to dominate the CV industry with nearly 60 per cent share, followed by Mahindra & Mahindra (M&M) with 18 per cent, and Ashok Leyland with 10 per cent. On the basis of usage, the industry can be broadly divided into two product segments, namely, goods vehicles (trucks) and passenger vehicles (buses). These can be further segmented on the basis of gross vehicle weight into light commercial vehicles (LCV) and medium and heavy commercial vehicles (MHCV).

Light commercial vehicles (Goods): Market share

Light commercial vehicles (Passenger): Market share

In 2000-01, Tata Motors and M&M were the main companies operating in the LCV (goods) segment. Tata Motors was the market leader with a share of 46 per cent, while M&M had a market share of 30 per cent. Tata Motors saw a substantial increase in market share in the LCV (goods) segment after it launched Tata Ace in 2005, which also ate into the sales of Tata's goods three-wheelers. In 2005-06, Tata Motors's share jumped to 61 per cent from 51 per cent in 2004-05. As of 2011-12, Tata Motors and M&M held 60 per cent and 31 per cent of the total market share, respectively. The LCV (goods) segment also includes players like Piaggio Vehicles, Force Motors and Swaraj Mazda, who altogether accounted for 5.6 per cent of the total sales as of 2011-12. Over the years, only M&M and Tata Motors have managed to retain a significant hold on the market. Piaggio Vehicles Ltd, a relatively new entrant, held a 2.6 per cent share as of 2011-12.

Medium and heavy commercial vehicles (Goods): Market share

Medium and heavy commercial vehicles (Passenger): Market share

Similarly, despite the longstanding presence of players like Eicher Motors and Swaraj Mazda and the entry of new players like Asia Motor Works in the MHCV segment, Tata Motors continues to be the market leader, followed by Ashok Leyland. Between 2002-03 and 2007-08, both Tata Motors and Ashok Leyland together held a market share of 90 per cent, with the former accounting for 66 per cent. During the same period, Eicher increased its market share from 6.5 per cent to 9 per cent . Asia Motor Works, which entered the market in 2007-08, garnered a market share of around 1.3 per cent. Its share rose further to 3.1 per cent in 2011-12. On the contrary, between 2007-08 and 2011-12, Tata Motors maintained its market share, while Ashok Leyland lost some share to Eicher Motors and new entrants such as Asia Motor Works.

Potrebbero piacerti anche