Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
6 2012
Changes in Posterior Condylar Offset After Total Knee Arthroplasty Cannot be Determined by Radiographic Measurements Alone
Henry D. Clarke, MD
Abstract: Restoration of femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO) may contribute to maximum flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Accurate radiographic measurement of postoperative PCO is possible, as the prosthesis margins can be easily identified; however, preoperative measurement of PCO may be inaccurate, as the remaining cartilage thickness of the posterior condyles is not included. This error may contribute to the controversy surrounding the importance of PCO. In this institutional review boardapproved study, the cartilage thickness of posterior condylar specimens resected during total knee arthroplasty was measured. Mean cartilage thicknesses of the posterior condyles were 1.7 mm (range, 0-4 mm) medially and 2.0 mm (range, 0-5 mm) laterally. As the cartilage thickness is variable, future studies of PCO must adjust the preoperative radiographic measurements by the cartilage thickness measured intraoperatively. Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, radiographic measurements, posterior condylar offset. 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Extensive research has been conducted to determine the variables that influence the range of motion that is obtained after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) [1-9]. Rather than a single variable, it appears that numerous factors may make important contributions: prosthesis design appears to play a role, as do patient-related factors, such as the preoperative range of motion of the knee [1-8]. Furthermore, certain aspects of the surgical technique have also been implicated including the amount of posterior tibial slope and whether posterior femoral osteophytes are adequately removed [9-11]. Restoration of femoral posterior condylar offset (PCO) has also been identified as a potentially important variable, yet the magnitude of the effect has been debated, with some authors noting no effect, and others reporting as little as a 1-mm reduction in PCO reducing maximum flexion by as much as 5 [10-18]. In these prior studies, the same technique has been used to measure the PCO. As first described by Bellemans et al [12], the PCO is evaluated on a true lateral radiograph of the distal femur by measuring the maximum thickness of the posterior
From the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona. Submitted November 13, 2011; accepted December 24, 2011. The Conflict of Interest statement associated with this article can be found at doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.026. Reprint requests: Henry D. Clarke, MD, Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054. 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 0883-5403/2706-0054$36.00/0 doi:10.1016/j.arth.2011.12.026
condyle, projected posteriorly to the tangent of the posterior cortex of the femoral shaft (Fig. 1A and B). Preoperative and postoperative measurements are then compared after adjusting the raw thickness by a magnification correction that is based upon a reference measurement of the diameter of the femoral shaft 10 cm proximal to the articular surface [12]. On the postoperative view, the inferior most aspects of the posterior condyles of the metal femoral component can be accurately identified (Fig. 1B). However, on the preoperative views, the inferior aspects of the posterior condyles are assumed to be represented by the bony margin (Fig. 1A). None of the prior studies have accounted for the thickness of the remaining cartilage on the posterior condyles (Figs. 2 and 3). Therefore, if this remaining cartilage is significant and variable in thickness, it would render calculations of changes in PCO inaccurate. This may account for some of the controversy regarding the effect of changes in PCO on range of motion after TKA. The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the thickness and variability of the remaining cartilage on the posterior condyles in patients under going TKA and (2) to identify whether the preoperative varus or valgus alignment influenced the remaining cartilage thickness.
1155
Fig. 1. (A) True lateral radiograph demonstrating preoperative PCO (distance A). (B) True lateral radiograph demonstrating postoperative PCO (distance B).
performed between January 1, 2009, and January 31, 2010, were reviewed. In 6 patients who had undergone bilateral TKA, data from only 1 knee were used (the first side performed, which was the most symptomatic knee); furthermore, only data from the first knee in 7 patients
Statistical Methods
Spearman rank correlation was used to calculate the correlation between the thickness of the remaining
Fig. 2. Resected portions of the posterior femoral condyles obtained during TKA; lateral (L) and medial (m) specimens are noted.
Fig. 3. The resected portion of the posterior lateral femoral condyle has been split in the sagittal plane, and the thickness of the remaining articular cartilage is measured to the nearest millimeter.
Changes in PCO After TKA Clarke Table 1. Distribution of Thickness of Remaining Cartilage on the Posterior Medial and Lateral Femoral Condyles in TKA
Thickness of Cartilage (mm) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Posterior Medial Femoral Condyle (No. of Knees) 28 32 47 32 5 0 Posterior Lateral Femoral Condyle (No. of Knees) 18 20 59 44 2 1
1157
cartilage on the medial and lateral posterior femoral condyles. Cartilage thickness was compared between patients with valgus, varus, and neutral alignment using the F test from a 1-way analysis of variance model. Pairwise comparisons between the groups were evaluated using the Tukey studentized range test to control the type I experiment wise error rate. All P values are 2 sided, and P b .05 was deemed statistically significant. SAS (version 9.1) statistical software (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC) was used for the analysis.
Results
The mean cartilage thickness on the posterior medial femoral condyle was 1.7 mm (range, 0-4 mm) and, on the posterior lateral femoral condyle, was 2.0 mm (range, 0-5 mm). The distribution of the cartilage thickness is noted in Table 1. There was no significant correlation between the thickness of the remaining cartilage on the medial and lateral posterior femoral condyles (r = 0.08) (95% confidence interval, 0.24 to 0.09; P = .35) in the same patient, although there was a trend to an inverse correlation. Overall limb alignment on the full-length hip-to-ankle x-ray was correlated with the pattern of wear. Patients with valgus alignment had significantly thicker remaining cartilage on the posterior medial femoral condyle than both groups with either varus or neutral alignment (P b .05). Similarly, patients with varus alignment had significantly thicker cartilage on the posterior lateral femoral condyle than both groups with either valgus or neutral alignment (P b .05).
Discussion
The importance of restoring the PCO after TKA has been the source of continuing debate [10-18]. Bellemans et al [12] first hypothesized that overresection of the posterior condyles, resulting in a reduction of the PCO, would lead to impingement between the posterior aspect of the tibia and the posterior cortex of the femur [11]. This impingement, in turn, was postulated to result in a limitation of the maximal postoperative flexion that could be obtained [11,12]. In their original article on this subject, in which they studied a group of 150 patients who underwent TKA, Bellemans et al [12] noted that with a cruciate-retaining total knee prosthesis, for each
millimeter reduction in PCO, a mean reduction of 6.1 of flexion resulted postoperatively. Although reported to be a significant variable in determining the ultimate flexion that is obtained, other authors have reported varying magnitudes of this effect caused by changes in PCO. Massin and Gournay [11] reported that based upon a radiographic study, a 3-mm decrease in PCO could reduce flexion by 10. In distinction, Seo et al [18] were unable to identify a correlation between changes in PCO and postoperative flexion with a cruciate-retaining prosthesis. Moreover, the importance of PCO appears to be less significant in the presence of a posterior-stabilized or posterior-sacrificing knee prosthesis [14,15]. This is likely due to the kinematics and rollback being dictated by the prosthesis that reduces the risk of impingement, rather than being constrained by the native posterior cruciate ligament. Kim et al [14] reported no impact on postoperative flexion between 2 groups of patients who had undergone TKA with a posterior cruciate substituting knee prosthesis where 1 group had a 1.2-mm reduction in the PCO and the other group did not. Similar findings were reported by Hanratty et al [15] using a cruciate-sacrificing, mobilebearing prosthesis. Explanations for the controversy of the effect of changes in PCO may be due to the presence of other confounding variables including differences in the preoperative range of motion of the patients; whether posterior osteophytes were removed intraoperatively; and differences in tibial slope that were not controlled. Differences in the techniques used to measure changes in PCO may also play a role. Indeed, although similar radiographic techniques were used in these studies, the potential for systematic interobserver error exists and has not been adequately investigated. Inherent errors in the measurement techniques may also account for the inconsistent findings. The radiographic measurement of postoperative PCO can be readily determined, as the inferior most aspect of the posterior condyles of the metal femoral component can be accurately identified on the lateral radiograph. However, on the preoperative radiograph, the inferior aspect of the posterior condyles is assumed to be represented by the bony margin, whereas in most cases, there is some remaining cartilage. None of the prior studies have accounted for the thickness of the remaining cartilage on the posterior condyles. Variability in the thickness of this remaining cartilage would potentially render calculations of changes in PCO inaccurate, especially where changes of only 1 to 3 mm may have such a profound effect. No prior studies on the potential error introduced by variability in the remaining cartilage could be identified in the literature. In the present study, the variability of the remaining cartilage on the medial and lateral posterior femoral condyles was between 0 and 5 mm. Although there was a correlation between the
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Brie N. Noble, BS, Section of Biostatics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Ariz, for her assistance with the statistical methods and analysis in this manuscript.
References
1. Gandhi R, Tso P, Davey JR, et al. High-flexion implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. Knee 2009;16:14. 2. Gupta SK, Ranawat AS, Shah V, et al. The PFC Sigma PR-F TKA designed for improved performance: a matched-pair study. Orthopedics 2006;29(9 Suppl):S49.