Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
MURRAY WEISS, STEPHANIE GASKELL, and : JOHN DOES 1 AND 2, Defendants. : -------------------------------------x May 16, 2007 9:30 a.m. :
Deposition of MURRAY WEISS, taken by Counsel for the Plaintiff, held at the Law Offices of Jared M. Lefkowitz, 48 Wall Street, New York, New York, before Susan B. Ratner, a Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public within and for the State of New York.
A P P E A R A N C E S:
LAW OFFICES OF JARED M. LEFKOWITZ Attorneys for the Plaintiff 48 Wall Street New York, New York 10005 BY: JARED M. LEFKOWITZ, ESQ.
HOGAN & HARTSON, LLP Attorneys for the Defendants 875 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 BY: JASON P. CONTI, ESQ.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the attorneys for the respective parties herein, that filing and sealing be and the same are hereby waived. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that all objections, except as to the form of the question, shall be reserved to the time of the trial. IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the within deposition may be sworn to and signed before any officer authorized to administer an oath, with the same force and effect as if signed and sworn to before the Court.
called as a witness, having been first duly sworn by the Notary Public (Susan B. Ratner), stating his business address at New York Post, 1211 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10036, was examined and testified as follows: EXAMINATION BY MR. LEFKOWITZ: Q. A. Q. A. Q. A. Q. Good morning. Good morning. Have you ever given a deposition before? Yes. How many times? I believe twice. When was the first time that you gave a
Q. A. Q. A. Q. A.
Were you a party in that lawsuit? No. Were you a witness? I don't know how to describe myself. Who were the parties to the lawsuit? I think a gentleman named Lawrence
6 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Flynn. He was the major general in charge of the New York National Guard. I think at that point he maybe wasn't any longer and he had -MR. CONTI: He is just asking for the parties to that lawsuit. THE WITNESS: I am sorry. A. Post. Q. Did you testify in connection with your That is one party and then I guess the
being an employee of the Post? A. Q. A. Yes. What was the nature of that lawsuit? There was an article written that he had
some concerns over. Q. A. What kind of concerns? He was concerned that there was an
Was it a libel lawsuit or something else? A. Q. A. I don't know actually. You said that this was in the 1990s? Uh-huh.
7 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft MR. CONTI: You have to say yes or no. Q. A. You have to say yes or no. What was the question? MR. CONTI: You did not give an audible answer. You have to give an audible answer for the court reporter. THE WITNESS: Can I get the question again? (Question read.) A. Q. Yes, correct. Was there a trial in that lawsuit? (At this time, Mr. Suson entered the deposition room.) A. Q. A. Q. No. Did it settle? No. What was the resolution?
A.
whatever term you want. Q. Favorably for the Post or favorably for
the other side? A. Q. For the Post. What was the second time that you were
8 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft involved in a deposition? A. I recently gave a deposition in regards
to an action involving a town upstate that cut some trees of mine down. Q. This was involving your personal
the name "Gary Suson" or the "Ground Zero Museum Workshop"? A. Q. What is the question? When is the first time that you heard
the name "Gary Suson" or the "Ground Zero Museum Workshop"? A. Q. A. I don't remember the first time. About when would it be? It was about the day before we published
Q.
before, approximately, August 30th of 2005? A. Q. Correct. Would you please tell me a little bit
9 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Did you go to college? A. Q. A. Q. A. Q. A. Yes. Where did you go? Queens College. What year did you graduate? '73. What degree did you get? A bachelor with an honors major in
college? A. Q. A. Q. A. Q. No. Did you ever study journalism anywhere? No. Do you consider yourself -While in college, no. I said anywhere. Did you ever study journalism anywhere?
A.
I have 32 years in the -MR. CONTI: Let's slow down. Listen to the question and answer the
10 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft A. Q. A. Q. way? A. Q. Academically, no. I am not talking about academically. I am saying, in any other way other than academically, did you study journalism? A. Q. I have a 32-year career in journalism. So you consider yourself to be a Academically? Yes. No. Did you study journalism in any other
being a journalist for those many years, do you have any other study or have you taken any other courses or anything like that in journalism? A. No.
I taught a course in journalism. MR. CONTI: That is not the question. Listen to the question. A. Q. The answer is no. Where did you teach a course in
journalism? A. Q. A. Q. A. At The New School. When was that? Fifteen years ago. All right. Maybe more. MR. CONTI: Off the record. (Discussion off the record.) MR. CONTI: Back on the record. Q. As a journalist, is it -- I am sorry, do
you have a problem? THE WITNESS: (To Mr. Conti) can I ask you a question? MR. CONTI: Do you want to step outside? THE WITNESS: Yes. Sorry.
MR. LEFKOWITZ: That is fine. (At this time, Mr. Conti and the witness left the deposition room to confer and then returned.) Q. A. Mr. Weiss, do you -I need to add something to an answer to
a question that you asked. Q. A. Sure, by all means. I believe you asked me how many times I
was deposed. I mentioned two. There was actual a third time. Q. A. Q. A. Q. A. When was that third time? 2004; 2003, 2004. Were you a party in that lawsuit? No. Who were the parties? The family of John O'Neill and a woman,
I believe she was the other party, Valerie James. Q. A. Who is John O'Neill? John O'Neill was the head of the FBI's
counterterrorism programs for six years leading up to 9/11 and he was in charge of all of their efforts to find Osama bin Laden and protect the United States. He ultimately died on 9/11 in the World Trade Center. Q. What was the nature of your testimony in
information that I wrote in a book I did about Mr. O'Neill. Q. 2004? I am sorry, you said that this was in
13 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft A. Q. Yes. As a journalist, have you ever had
occasion to interview witnesses? A. Q. Yes, I think. When you interview a witness, do you
take their word for what it is they tell you or do you seek to find corroborating information? A. Each case is different. It depends upon
who the witnesses are. Q. Would you please turn to Exhibit 100. Have you ever seen this article before entitled "9/11 Cam 'Scam'"? A. Q. A. Q. A. Q. Yes. Did you write this article? No. Did you write the headline? No. Did you write, I guess it would be, the
second headline, where it says, "Man claims falsely to be official Ground Zero fotog"? A. Q. No, sir. Do you see in the byline it includes
14 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Q. A. Q. That is you, right? That is me. What involvement did you have with
writing this article? A. Q. A. story? Q. A. Q. Yes. Several of the quotes in the story. When you say you contributed to the I contributed some reporting. What did you contribute? Are you asking specifically to this
reporting with several of the quotes, does that mean that you interviewed the witnesses who gave those quotes? A. Q. A. Yes. What else did you do? In connection with the reporting for
Q. A. Q.
Is that the only thing that you did? I don't remember anything that I did. Did you do anything other than interview
witnesses? A. Q. I don't really fully recall. Did you, for instance, do an Internet
15 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft search on Gary Suson? A. recall. Q. Did you ask any reporters at the New I don't believe I did, but I can't
York Post for material they may have on Gary Suson? A. Q. I don't recall. Did you ask the New York Post library
for any information they may have on Gary Suson? A. Q. A. I don't believe I did. Did you read Gary Suson's book? When? I don't understand. Q. In connection with your reporting for
this article. A. Q. A. On that day, no. Did you ever read Gary Suson's book? I believe I looked at it.
Q. at it? A. Q.
16 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Q. You are aware that there are several
other articles which are the subject of this lawsuit, are you not? A. Q. Yes. Did you read Gary Suson's book before
any of those other articles were published? A. Q. I don't believe so. Did you do an Internet search on Gary
Suson before any of those other articles were published? A. Q. I don't recall. Did you seek information from other New
York Post reporters about Gary Suson before those articles were published? A. Repeat the question. Sorry. (Question read.) A. I had conversations with other
reporters. Q. A. Q. A. Q. Who? Cynthia Fagen. Anyone else? I am not certain. Did you talk with Stephanie Gaskell?
17 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft A. Q. I believe I did. What did you talk about with Cynthia
Fagen? A. Q. A. The subject of this article. Specifically, what did you talk about? Mr. Suson's museum and his assertions of
having taken pictures at Ground Zero after 9/11. Q. A. Q. Anything else? That is fundamentally it. What about Ms. Gaskell, what did you
talk about with her? A. Q. I don't really recall. Did you talk about the story with any of
the editors at the Post? A. Q. A. Q. Yes. Who? I am not sure who. Did you speak with Gregg Birnbaum?
A. Q.
I may have, but I don't recall. So I guess you would not recall what you
spoke with him about? A. Q. A. No. Did you speak with -I don't recall specifically who I spoke
18 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft to. Q. A. Q. A. Q. A. Q. Did you speak with Jesse Angelo? I might have. But you are not certain? Not 100 percent, no. What about David Boyle? I don't believe I spoke to him. Were there any other copy editors or
employees at the Post that you can recall speaking to about these stories before they were published? A. Q. No. Referring back to Exhibit 100, what are
the quotes in the article that are attributable to your reporting? A. Q. I believe the one from Mr. Gribbon. Would you point that out, as far as
paragraph. MR. CONTI: For the record, why don't you start to read the sentence. A. It says, "'No one was authorized to take
and just ask you a question after that. The quote is "'No one was authorized to take artifacts whether they were personal belongings or dangling from a Dumpster.'" Is that a quote that you obtained from Frank Gribbon? A. Q. A. I believe so. When did you speak with Frank Gribbon? The day before this article was
published, I presume, August 30th. Q. Who asked you to begin working on this
article? A. Q. A. Editors on the city desk. When did they ask you to do that? Sometime in the course of the day.
Q.
the issues and asked me if I would assist in reporting out the story.
20 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Q. What is the thrust of the story that
they told you to investigate? A. That Mr. Suson had a museum that had
materials from Ground Zero, that he had taken photographs and was charging a fee and there were some concerns, perhaps, about his full rights, whether all of this was something that he could and should be doing. Q. Who had those concerns you mentioned a
moment ago? A. I am not sure who did. I was just told that there were some concerns. I began to look into them. Q. Did anybody outside of the New York Post
have any concerns? A. I am not sure who did. It's clear that the fire department spokesman says that he does.
Q.
him in connection with this article? A. I don't know what he knew before. Let me say that differently. I don't know what his concerns were until I called him.
21 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Q. When you called him, did he answer the
phone right away or did you have to leave a message and he called you back or how did that happen? A. Q. I don't recall. But you ended up speaking with him the
day before this article was published? A. Q. A. Q. Yes. How many times did you speak with him? I don't recall. What did you ask him? What questions
asked if he was aware that Mr. Suson has a museum and it was clear that he was well aware of Mr. Suson and this matter. Q. How was it clear to you that he was well
A. Q.
Judging by his answer. When you say "this matter," what are you
Mr. Suson had a museum, he had taken pictures and Mr. Gribbon, by my history of being a reporter and
22 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft talking to him, I understood from his response that he knew about this before I called him. Q. Had you spoken with Mr. Gribbon before
you called him about other subjects? MR. CONTI: Just -MR. LEFKOWITZ: Withdrawn. Q. Prior to this conversation with
Mr. Gribbon, had you ever spoken with him before? A. Q. A. Q. Of course. About how many times? Hundreds and hundreds. Was that in connection with
Q.
friend of his? A. Q. A. I am friendly with him, yes. Have you socialized with him? A few times, mostly at functions that
word "artifacts"? A. Q. A. Q. No. Did you ask him? No. Did you ask him whether other people
besides Gary Suson had removed items from Ground Zero? A. Q. I don't recall. Do you think that that would have been
Q.
on, but this was the focus of our story, obviously. Q. When you say "this," what are you
published.
24 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Q. So you purposely did not ask about other
people because you were solely concerned with Gary Suson? MR. CONTI: Objection to form, but go ahead and answer. A. No, that is not true. I did not purposely not ask about anything. I made an inquiry regarding this matter. I can't recall if I asked about any other people and that is the sum total of it. Q. A. How long did your conversation take? Probably a few minutes. As I indicated, Mr. Gribbon seemed to be fully aware -MR. CONTI: The question was just how long the conversation took. Q. What did he say to make you come to the
seemed to have knowledge of Mr. Suson and this matter. Q. What did he say to make you think that?
25 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft A. I quoted him. He said one or two other things that he thought Mr. -- that clearly he felt that Mr. Suson may have done something improper. Q. A. What were those other things? I don't recall exactly the words, but he
clearly had serious issues with it. Q. A. Q. A. Q. What did -"He" meaning the fire department. What issues were those? Mr. Suson's authority to do what he did. When you say "to do what he did," you
are talking about the removal of the items from Ground Zero? A. Q. Everything related to his conduct. Did you take notes of this conversation
Q. A. Q. A. Q.
Did you keep those notes? For a period of time, yes. How long a period of time? I don't recall. You threw away those notes at some
point, though?
like the words "threw away," but I don't have them. I believe that I disposed of them. Q. Do you have a practice of keeping notes
for a certain period of time before discarding them? A. I keep notes for a period of time.
There is no practice on how long. Q. A. Q. Why do you keep them? It depends upon the story. It depends. Why did you keep the notes of your
conversation with Mr. Gribbon for a period of time? A. time. Q. them? A. There are many reasons why you discard What prompts your decision to discard I keep all of my notes for a period of
notes over time. Q. A. What were the reasons in this case? None specifically to this case. It would be as simple as I can't keep all of my notes forever. Q. Did you discard your notes before or
27 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft after this lawsuit was brought? A. Q. Before. Are you aware that this lawsuit was
brought less than a year after the articles came out? A. Q. I am aware, yes, if you tell me. What other quotes in Exhibit 100 are
attributable to your reporting? A. The paragraphs that follow the one where
spokesman Frank Gribbon is quoted. Q. Also the paragraph that begins, "An NYPD
spokesman told The Post..."? A. Q. Yes. And the paragraph that begins,
"Possession of the artifacts could be illegal..."? A. Q. Correct. And the paragraph that begins, "'You
can't tamper with a crime scene...'"? A. Q. Yes. What about the next paragraph, which
28 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft begins, "Suson said that he did not think that loved ones of the 9/11 victims would want the items he has"? A. Q. No. Are any of the other paragraphs
attributable to your reporting? A. Q. A. Q. Give me a second to just look over this. By all means. I don't believe so. How long has Frank Gribbon been a
spokesman for the FDNY? A. I don't know. Maybe ten years or more. I am not sure. Q. Who is the "law-enforcement source"
referred to in the article? I will refer to the paragraph. It's the paragraph right after the Frank Gribbon quote. It's the one that starts, "A law-enforcement
source noted that Ground Zero was declared a 'crime scene'..." A. He is not identified there. It would be Inspector Michael Coan, now Chief Michael Coan. Q. At the time, he was Inspector Michael
29 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Coan? A. Q. Coan? A. Presumably the day before this article Yes. When did you speak with then Inspector
was published. MR. CONTI: For the record, I think it's C-o-a-n. THE WITNESS: That is right, C-o-a-n. He is not Jewish. Q. You called him to ask him questions
about this? A. Q. A. office. Q. First of all, how many times did you Yes. What did you ask him? I called him and I spoke to him in his
MR. CONTI: On that day? MR. LEFKOWITZ: On that day. A. Q. A. Q. In connection with this? Yes. I am not sure; once, twice. What did you ask him?
30 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft A. I asked him what the view of the police
department is toward Ground Zero, materials there, and what the police department's view would be of people taking stuff from the Ground Zero area. Q. Did you ask him about "stuff" or did you
ask him about personal artifacts? A. I asked him about materials from Ground
Zero, be they people's -- clearly stuff that is -whether it's construction debris or people's things that could be tied to people who either lived or died there or worked there. Q. What was his response with respect to
"'personal artifacts are the property of the people who own them'"?
A. Q. A.
Yes, that is part of his answer; yes. What is the other part? They are there. They are published in
the story. MR. CONTI: Read them into the record. A. "A law-enforcement source noted that
31 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Ground Zero was declared a 'crime scene' after the attacks and said that 'personal artifacts are the property of the people who own them.'" Q. A. Is that everything that he told you? That pretty much covers the territory. In addition -- and the remark after it. Q. The one that states, "'You can't tamper
with a crime scene and take stuff from [it]'...,"; is it that quote? A. Yes. MR. CONTI: Did you finish your answer as to all of the quotes there that Mr. Coan gave you? THE WITNESS: No. MR. CONTI: Let's finish your answer. A. The sum and substance of Mr. Coan's
expression of the police department's official view is expressed in all of those quotes,
including one that we have not mentioned, "An NYPD spokesman told The Post, 'The NYPD has gone to great lengths to return property to survivors and relatives of those who were lost and continues to do so.'" Q. Did you talk to Inspector Coan about the
fact that Gary Suson did not remove personal belongings from Ground Zero? MR. CONTI: Objection to form. Q. You can answer. MR. CONTI: I think he answered the question, but go ahead. I objected. A. What is the question again? (Question read.) A. Isn't that part of the question at hand
questions. Why don't you just go ahead and answer the question that I asked you.
MR. CONTI: If you can. If you can't answer the question, you can't answer the question. A. Q. A. Q. A. I am not clear on the question. Did you ever talk to Gary Suson? No. Did you ever investigate to find out -Actually, I take that back. He might
33 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Q. about? A. Q. A. Q. No. Did you -It's vague. Did you ever investigate or do research Do you remember what you spoke to him
to find out what types of items Gary Suson had removed from Ground Zero? A. It's my understanding that the items are
the article? A. Q. Yes. Other than those items, did you ever do
an investigation or research to find out what else he might have removed from Ground Zero? A. Q. No. Did you ever -- now referring to the
items included in the article -- did you ever find out the circumstances regarding the removal of the "child's stuffed teddy bear"; did you ever find out about that? A. Only in what was represented to me by my
colleagues.
34 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Q. A. Q. What colleagues? The city desk, Cynthia Fagen. Did anybody at the city desk speak with
Gary Suson? A. Q. I don't know who they spoke to. If you would answer my question, please. MR. CONTI: He just said he did not know who he spoke to. Q. What did Cynthia Fagen tell you about
the child's stuffed teddy bear? A. Q. A. Q. I don't recall. What about the battered cell phone? I don't recall. Did anybody tell you anything about the
battered cell phone? A. recall. Q. What about the walkie-talkie? I don't recall anything about -- I don't
A. Q.
you regarding that walkie-talkie? A. Q. A. I don't know. Did anybody give you any information? I don't recall.
35 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft About a walkie-talkie? I don't recall. Q. A. Q. What about the rag doll? I do not recall. What about the pair of twisted
eyeglasses? A. Q. I do not recall. Did you list these items to the NYPD
Inspector Coan when you spoke with him? A. items. Q. items? A. Q. A. Q. I might have. What types of items did you give to him? I don't recall. Was the recovery effort at Ground Zero Did you give him examples of types of I don't believe I listed items, specific
or anyone else, to your knowledge? MR. CONTI: I am sorry, I did not understand that. Could I have that read back, please? (Question read.) A. Yes.
36 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Q. A. Who was it run by? Well, various law-enforcement agencies
had different aspects of it, but for the most part it was a New York City Police Department initiative. Q. The recovery efforts at Ground Zero you
the question. Am I allowed to ask you a question? Q. A. Sure. Are you referring to -MR. CONTI: Let's slow down. Q. you. A. Q. Zero? I took your question a different way. There were recovery efforts at Ground Let me explain it. I will back up for
A. Q. A. Q. A. Q.
Right, following 9/11. Following 9/11. Right. Meaning there were people out there -Right. -- digging through the rubble.
37 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft MR. CONTI: Let him finish the question. A. Q. A. Q. Uh-huh. You have to answer verbally. Yes. Who were those people that were digging
the cleanup at Ground Zero and the hunt for remains of people. Q. A. Who was digging through the rubble? The FDNY, NYPD, FBI, various other
agencies. Q. A. Who was in charge? That is a good question. I am not 1000 percent sure, but I think the NYPD, of the recovery. I could be wrong about that. Q. Did you ask that --
A.
that had the human recovery efforts. They ultimately were in charge of it. Q. A. Q. The NYPD you said? Yes. What about other kinds of recovery
efforts besides the human recovery efforts, was that designated under the purview of another authority? A. I believe the NYPD was the lead agency
in just about all aspects of the recovery. Q. Have you ever become aware that other
people removed items from Ground Zero? A. Q. Yes. When is the first time that you can
recall becoming aware that other people had removed items from Ground Zero? A. Q. A. Q. The first time? Yes. I am not sure when the first time was. Would it have been before or after these
articles were published? A. Q. Before, I believe. So before these articles were published
you were aware of other people having removed items from Ground Zero? A. Q. A. Correct. Who were these people? Some officials of the FBI took them,
39 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft and got in trouble for doing it. Q. A. Anyone else? I believe the Manhattan district
attorney had some cases involving people that took things. I cannot remember the specifics. Q. A. Q. What about non-law-enforcement people? I am not aware of any. What about after these articles were
published, did you become aware of non-law-enforcement people having removed items from Ground Zero? A. I am not sure if they are non-law
enforcement, but I think that there were other cases where serious concerns were raised about people who took stuff from Ground Zero. Q. A. Who were those people? I think in one of these articles there
is mention of somebody else. Q. A. Q. A. Q. You don't recall their name? Bellone. Mike Bellone? Yes. Do you recall anybody else?
40 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft A. Q. Not off the top my head. Why don't we go to Exhibit 102. Did you write this headline, "2nd Hit at 9/11 Fotog"? A. Q. No. Did you write what is in bold
underneath, "'Grave-rob' museum"? A. Q. No. Did you write any of the text of this
article? A. Q. I don't believe so. The byline refers to Murray Weiss. That is you, right? A. Q. Yes. What input did you have in the creation
none really.
MR. CONTI: Have you read through the piece to refresh your recollection? Take a minute or two to do that. THE WITNESS: All right. A. I apologize, yes, I apologize, I am
41 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft I did contribute to this article, yes. Q. A. What did you contribute? There are two paragraphs that refer to
the New York City Fire Department sending fire marshals to Mr. Suson's museum. That came from me. Q. What paragraphs are you referring to? MR. CONTI: Why don't you read the beginning of the two paragraphs. A. Paragraphs 5 and 6. "Yesterday, the FDNY dispatched two fire marshals to Suson's 'Ground Zero Museum Workshop' to investigate the exhibit." New paragraph, "The marshals could not gain entry to the building because the exhibit is by appointment only, but they plan to return." Q. A. Did you write those two paragraphs? No, I did not write them.
Q.
Cynthia Fagen to write them? A. Q. Yes, I did. Is that the sum total of your
the marshals, did you do any further investigation regarding Gary Suson or the Ground Zero workshop in between the publishing of the first article and this, the second article? A. Q. A. Q. A. Q. Not really. When you say "not really" -No. The answer is no? The answer is no. So you did not do any Internet search or
go to the library or ask the Post library -A. I likely did, yes. I likely did. I write lots and lots of articles. I read material, generally, all of the people that I write about. I likely looked at the website, but I don't recall whether I did or did not
the people that you write about, that means in advance of the articles, right? A. Q. Generally, yes. Did you do that in this case with Gary
43 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Suson? A. Q. I said that I don't specifically recall. Do you recall making a request of the
New York Post library for clips or other information regarding Gary Suson before these articles were published? MR. CONTI: Objection. It was asked and answered. You can answer it again. A. I don't believe that I asked the library
to research Mr. Suson for me. Q. A. Why not? I rely on -- we are a team of reporters.
We rely on one another to do aspects of the reporting. My colleagues made representations to me about information they had gathered and told me what they were aware of.
Q.
done that research, correct? A. I would believe so, yes. I would say -MR. CONTI: There is no question pending.
44 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Q. How did you find out that the FDNY had
dispatched two fire marshals to the workshop? A. I spoke with a confidential source of
mine in the New York City Fire Department. Q. A. Q. Did you call them or did they call you? I believe I called them. What is the name of this confidential
privilege here? MR. CONTI: Yes. For the record, the witness is not going to give the name of this particular source because we are relying on section 79-h of the New York Civil Rights Law, plus the first 14 amendments to the U.S. Constitution and
Article I, Section 8 of the New York State Constitution. Q. A. Q. A. You said that you called this person? I believe I did. Why did you call them? To learn what, if anything, the fire
45 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft department was doing regarding Mr. Suson and his museum. Q. A. Q. What did this source tell you? He told me what I reported here. Did you ask this source why they had not
done anything before the New York Post wrote a story about it? A. Q. I don't recall. Did you ask this person why they had not
done anything for the three years that had gone by since he removed the items? A. Q. I don't recall. Did you not think that those were
Q.
to this source to find out whether the marshals ever did gain entry? A. Q. I did, yes. When did you make this phone call? It was by phone call, I presume?
46 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft A. Yes. I can't recall if it was that day or the next. Q. A. "That day" being which day? The day that I spoke to -- it had to be
the next day. It had to be next day because they did not get in that day. Q. A. Q. Let's just -The answer is that I did. Let's just make this clear. We are talking about Exhibit 102 now -A. Q. Yes. -- which was published in the New York
Post on September 1, 2005, correct? A. Q. Yes. In this article you say, "Yesterday, the
Q.
this confidential source on August 30th, correct? A. 30 days -MR. CONTI: Objection. Let's go off the record for a second. (Discussion off the record.)
47 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft MR. CONTI: Back on the record. A. I spoke to him on August 31st. We reported the facts the following day, September 1st. That is why it says, "Yesterday, the FDNY dispatched two fire marshals..." Q. So you had this conversation with this
source on August 31st, correct? A. Q. Yes. In that conversation he told you that
the FDNY was dispatching two fire marshals? A. Q. Yes. You learned that day, on August 31st,
that those fire marshals were not able to gain access? A. Q. Correct. Did you ever have a telephone
followed up and found out whether or not these fire marshals were ever able to gain access? A. Q. Correct, I did. When was this second telephone
48 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft Q. A. What did the source tell you about that? They said that they went into the
arrested. Q. A. Q. Did you ask? I don't recall if I asked. Did you become aware whether Gary Suson
arrested or not. Q. Let's talk about this now. You found out that the fire marshals were able to gain access, right? A. Q. Correct. Did they tell you that they saw all of
the items that were in the museum? A. Q. A. Yes, they did. What did they tell you about that? They said that they confirmed that the
items were there and then they left. Q. Are fire marshals empowered to arrest if
49 Murray Weiss - Rough Draft they come across a crime? A. I guess they can. So can I. MR. CONTI: Don't guess. If you know, answer the question. A. I believe fire marshals can make
correct? A. Q. A. Q. Bound by law-enforcement rules. Correct? Yes, they are. Did they tell you that there were any
items that were in the museum that should not be in the museum? MR. CONTI: When you say "they," it's a single source we are talking about here, I believe.
Q. A.
Did the source tell you? That was the matter at hand for the fire
department, whether he had materials that he should or should not have. Q. Did this source tell you that Gary Suson
A. Q.
That was the indication, yes. Did they tell you, that is, did the
source tell you that something was going to be done about this? A. There was no indication what they were
going to do or not do. They were investigating. Q. Did you follow up to learn what happened
in that investigation? A. Q. A. time. Q. Now we are almost two years later. Have you investigated to find out whether the fire marshals concluded their investigation? A. Q. A. No, sir. Why not? I am on to doing a million different Not necessarily. Not really. Why not? Its was being investigated. They take
which indicated to you that the fire marshals were conducting a further investigation? A. They sent two marshals to the -- it's in
the story. The spokesman for the fire department said that he had issues with it. They sent fire marshals to the place to look at it. They did not get in. They went subsequently to see what was there. That is what is reported here. Q. Is it reported here that they
subsequently got in and saw what was there? A. No. In this article, it only reports that they went and planned on returning. Is that what it says? Yes, "...they plan to return." Q. You became aware that they did, in fact,
return? A. Correct.
Q. A. Q.
Why did you not publish that? I don't recall. Well, there was an article the very next
day; was there not? A. I guess. MR. CONTI: Don't guess. If you know, answer the question. A. It appears that there were subsequent
articles, you had already learned that the marshals had been there and seen the items? A. I don't recall when they went and I
don't recall when they saw them. Q. When did you have this follow-up
conversation with the source? A. Q. I don't recall. Please look at Exhibit 103. MR. CONTI: We have been going for about an hour.
Before we continue, I would like to take a short break. MR. LEFKOWITZ: Sure. Off the record. (Discussion off the record.) (Short recess taken.) MR. LEFKOWITZ: Back on the record. BY MR. LEFKOWITZ: Q. A. Q. Would you look at Exhibit 103, please. Yes. Do you see the article entitled "9/11
'cur'ator Mike rips 'sick' scavenger"? A. Q. A. Q. Yes. Did you write that headline? No, sir. Did you write any of the language in the
text of the article? A. I have to read it. MR. CONTI: Take your time. A. Q. All right. Did you have any involvement in the
research or publication for this article? A. Q. No, sir. Go to Exhibit 104, please. Referring to the article entitled "Mike rips Sept. 11 'cur'ator," did you write that headline? A. Q. No, sir. Again, I see that your name is not in
the byline for this article. Did you write any of the text for it? A. Q. A. Q. Give me a second and I will read it. By all means. No, sir. Did you have any involvement in the
research or publication for this article? A. Q. No. Who makes the decision to place the
articles or the picture at the top, next to the "NYPD Daily Blotter"? A. All decisions of the placement of
stories are made by the news editors. Q. Do you know who the news editor for this
might have been? A. Q. No. Would you please go to Exhibit 105. Do you see the article at the bottom entitled, "9/11-charity big busted"? A. Q. A. Q. byline. Did you write any of the text of the article? A. Q. A. Q. Give me a second and I will read it. Of course. No, sir. Did you have any involvement in Yes. Did you write that headline? No. Again, I see your name is not in the
MR. LEFKOWITZ: Why don't we go off the record. I might be done. MR. CONTI: All right. MR. LEFKOWITZ: Off the record. (Discussion off the record.) (Short recess taken.) MR. LEFKOWITZ: Back on the record. I have no further questions. MR. CONTI: I have no questions of the witness. We are done for today. MR. LEFKOWITZ: Off the record. (Discussion off the record.) (Time noted: 10:45 a.m.)
MURRAY WEISS