TIME COMPRESSION USING FAST TRACK APPROACH

AMIR AZMI BIN NAWAWI

A project report is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science (Construction Management)

Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

DECEMBER 2010

ii

iii

Special dedication to my beloved parents, wife and son for their prays, moral support and inimitable composure; may all of us always in the blessings of ALLAH

iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First and foremost, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation and gratitude to my supervisor, Associate Professor Dr. Mohamad Ibrahim Mohamad for his guidance and support in preparation of this project. Without his continued support, this study would not have been materializing as it is here.

I also owe special thanks and appreciation to those who have rendered their input and helps in completing this project especially to the Client, Project Managers, Consultants and other parties who had been directly and indirectly involved, naming them among others; En Fadzil, Ir. Khairul, Ir. Malek, En. Syamsul Azuar, En. Norhisham, En. Rizal, En. Hassan, En. Zainal, En. Abd. Rashid, Cik Nurasiah, En. Nor Azron, En. Shahizad and En. Aiman.

Last but not least, to all learned lecturers and fellow classmates from MIA 14 of the Faculty of Civil Engineering (FKA), you all will always reside in my highest conscious mind and wits.

ABSTRACT

The new Low Cost Carrier Terminal (LCCT) runway is one of the Governments priority projects which involve the national interest. Having targeted to be fully completed in the first quarter of 2012, the task of implementing the runway construction is so crucial demanding a compressed construction time for completion and therefore, the usage of Fast Track approach is preferred in meeting the tight schedule. This study is carried out to investigate why Fast Track approach is required in the LCCT project implementation. Apart from this, the study also evaluate the strategies being used as well as time saving aspect to achieve early delivery of the project compared to traditional approach of project delivery. Further, the study establishes the time saving achieved by each of the Fast Track strategies being adopted in the Master Implementation Programme. In this context, the simulator schedules have been prepared and comparison had been carried out against the Fast Track schedule. Eventually, the number of days in time saving is derived and the effectiveness of the Fast Track strategies is therefore proven. The outcome of the research would be of assistance to the professionals in the construction industry in carrying out the planning for their projects especially on projects which demanding a shorter completion delivery.

vi

ABSTRAK

Projek Landasan Kapal Terbang Terminal Tambang Rendah (LCCT) yang baru merupakan salah satu projek utama kerajaan yang melibatkan kepentingan umum. Disasarkan untuk disiapkan pada suku pertama 2012, tugas melaksanakan pembinaan landasan ini begitu getir di mana ia menuntut jangkamasa pembinaan yang singkat dan untuk itu, pendekatan kaedah Fast Track telah digunakan bagi memenuhi masa pembangunan yang singkat ini. Kajian ini dibuat untuk mengkaji justifikasi kenapa kaedah Fast Track amat diperlukan di dalam perlaksanaan projek landasan LCCT ini. Di samping itu, kajian ini juga menilai strategi yang digunakan serta aspek penjimatan masa berbanding kaedah pendekatan tradisional. Seterusnya, kajian ini membuat penilaian terhadap penjimatan yang dicapai melalui penggunaan kaedah Fast Track ini dibandingkan dengan kaedah tradisional. Dalam konteks ini, simulator untuk Program Perlaksanaan Kerja yang mengguna pakai elemen fast track telah digunakan. Seterusnya kajian ini membuat penilaian terhadap aspek penjimatan masa yang dapat dicapai melalui penggunaan kaedah Fast Track ini seperti yang terdapat di dalam MIP (Master Implementation Programme) berbanding dengan kaedah tradisional. Kajian ini telah dapat menunjukkan strategi utama yang sesuai dipadankan dengan penggunaan kaedah Fast Track secara lebih praktikal dalam usaha memendekkan tempoh projek.

vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER DECLARATION DEDICATION

TITLE

PAGE ii iii iv v vi vii xi xiii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ABSTRACT ABSTRAK TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES LIST OF FIGURES

INTRODUCTION 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 Introduction Background of the Study Problem Statement Scope of Study Aim and Objective of Study Brief Methodology Organization of Dissertation 1 2 3 4 4 5 6

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

Introduction Definition of Fast Track Fundamental Strategies of Fast Track Approach Methodology of Implementing Fast Track Approach Selection of Ideal Procurement System in Fast Track Approach

7 7 8 11 12

viii

2.5.1 Separated and Cooperative Procurement System 2.5.2 Integrated Procurement System 2.5.3 Management Oriented Procurement System
2.6

13 14 16 17 18 23 24 25 26

The Process of The Various Procurement System 2.6.1 The Effect of The Different Procurement Systems on Project Performance

2.7 2.8 2.9 2.10 3

Schedule Compression Tools in Assisting and Developing Fast Track Approach in Planning and Scheduling Design Criteria For Fast Track Approach Conclusion

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.5 3.6 3.7 3.8

4

Introduction Literature Review Document Search Interview Questionnaire Survey Development of Scheduling Simulator Analysis and Results 3.7.1 Relative Index Conclusion and Recommendation

28 28 29 29 29 29 30 30 31

CASE STUDY

4.1 4.2 4.3

Introduction Background of Site Condition and General Geology Soil Investigation Input 4.3.1 Subsoil Profile 4.3.2 Proposed Ground Treatment Scheme: Preloading with Pre-fabricated Vertical Drains

32 33 35 35 36

ix

4.4

Alternative Construction Technology for Compaction 4.4.1 About The High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compactor Machine

38 39 43 45 47 48 52

4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9

5

Overview of KLIA and LCCT Passengers Capacity KLIA Aeropolis Masterplan Commercial Opportunity Interviews Questionnaire Survey

DEVELOPMENT OF SCHEDULING SIMULATOR

5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 6

Introduction Establishing Simulator Schedule Determining Weightage of Activities Without Fast Track Elements Establishing Constant of Activities Without Fast Track Elements Data Input

58 61 63 65 67

RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6

Introduction Findings From the Interviews Findings From Questionnaires The Justification For Compressing Project Schedule Based on The Case Study Strategies in Implementing Fast Track Approach Evaluation of Time Saving 6.6.1 Scenario 1: Schedule Simulator Without Enhance Design of Closer PVD Spacing 6.6.2 Scenario 2: Schedule Simulator Without Schedule Compression Of Additional Working Time

75 75 78 85 91 93 94

97

6.6.3 Scenario 3: Schedule Simulator Without Construction Technology Of HIDPR Compactor 6.6.4 Scenario 4: Schedule Simulator Without Overlapping Task Activity Based On Sequence Of Works 6.6.5 Summary 7 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 8 9
CONCLUSION

101

105 110

Objective 1: The Needs and Rationale for Fast Track Approach in LCCT Runway Project Objective 2: The Strategies of Using Fast Track Approach in LCCT Runway Project Objective 3: Evaluation of Time Saving Recommendation 112 113 114 115-117 118-148 111

REFERENCES APPENDICES

xi

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE NO.

TITLE

PAGE

4.1

Summary of Proposed Ground Treatment Details in LCCT Project 36

4.2

Data on Passengers Capacity of Current Terminal Building and After New 43 43 44 46

4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6

Handling Passengers Capacity of Current LCCT Handling Passengers Capacity on Proposed New LCCT Passengers and Aircraft movement in KLIA Background of Professional Respondent Interviewed by Researcher

49 50

4.7 4.8

Content Analysis of Interview in Case Study Background of professional responded in the Questionnaire exercise

52 55

4.9 5.1

Summary of Questionnaire Results The Weightage of Earthworks Elements as Per Researchers Findings

64 65 65

5.2 5.3 5.4

Constant Factor on Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain Constant Factors on High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling List or Activities Involved in Earthworks and Its Weightage and Constant Abstracted from Data Collection

66 66

5.5

Constant Factor on Schedule Compression

xii

LIST OT TABLES (CONTD)

TABLE NO. 5.6

TITLE Calculation of Time Prolongation by not Incorporating for Closer Spacing of Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) Simulation of Work Programme Purpose

PAGE

67

5.7

Calculation of Time Prolongation by not Incorporating High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compactor for Simulation of Work Programme Purpose 70

5.8

Calculation of Time Prolongation by not Incorporating Schedule Compression Approach for Simulation of Work Programme Purposes 72

6.1 6.2

Data on Passengers Capacity in LCCT for Air Asia Group of Companies Calculation of Period Prolongation Between the MIP of LCCT (Benchmark) and Simulator Schedule without Element of Closer PVD

86

94-95

6.3

Calculation of Period Prolongation Between the MIP of LCCT (Benchmark) and Simulator Schedule without Element of Schedule Compression 98-99

6.4

Calculation of Period Prolongation Between the MIP of LCCT (Benchmark) and Simulator Schedule without Element of Construction Technology i.e. HIDPR Compactor

102-103

6.5

Summary of Completion Period Difference in Simulator Schedules as Against Fast Track Approach Schedules as Adopted in LCCT Project 108

xiii

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURES NO. 1.1 1.2 2.1 2.2 2.3 Site Location Map

TITLE

PAGE 2 5 10 13

Framework of Research Activity Relationships Category of Building Procurement Systems The Linear or Sequential Process of the Traditional Procurement System

17

2.4

The Integrated Process of Project Designing and Construction in the Design and Build Procurement System 18

2.5

The Process of Project Designing and Construction in the Management Contracting & Professional Construction Management Procurement System 18 34

4.1 4.2

Geological Map of KLIA Site Photograph of the Process of Installation of Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) at Package EW02A, LCCT Project

37

4.3

Photograph of Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) Driving Rigs at Package EW02A, LCCT Project 37 40 42

4.4 4.5

Components of High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compactor Machine How the Impact Compactor Works

xiv

LIST OF FIGURES (CONTD)

FIGURES NO. 4.6

TITLE

PAGE

Photograph of High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compactor at Work in Package EW02A, LCCT Project 42 49

4.7 4.8

Pie Chart of Professional Respondents Interviewed Pie Chart of Responded Parties in the Questionnaires Exercise

53 57

4.9 5.1

Summary of Questionnaires Result Task Summary of Master Implementation Schedule Based on Fast Track Approach as applied in the LCCT Project

60

5.2

Flow Chart of Establishment of the Simulator Programme 62

5.3

Example of Data Input Based on New Duration Due to Longer Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) Spacings 69

5.4

Example of Data Input Based on New Duration Due to Usage of Normal Compactor in Compaction Method 71

5.5

Example of Data Input Based on New Duration by Traditional Open Completion Period i.e. Not Using Schedule Compression Element 73

5.6

Example of Scheduling on Finish to Start Basis on the Activity of Pavement Works 74

xv

LIST OF FIGURES (CONTD)

FIGURES NO. 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4

TITLE

PAGE 78

Cruciality of Fast Track Approach for LCCT Project Views on Weather Early Completion Could Be Met in Traditional Approach Opinion on Soil Problem of Which the Major Hindrance in the Early Completion of LCCT Project Opinion on the Benefits of Fast Track Approach Economically Opinion on Suitability of Overlapping Work Process for the LCCT Project

79 79 80

6.5

80

6.6

Opinion on the Usage of PVD would Help Expedite the Construction Work in LCCT Project 81

6.7

Opinion on the Usage of Dynamic Compactor Machine would Expedite The Construction Work 81

6.8 6.9

Views on Effect of Time Compression Approach to the Delivery of LCCT Project Views on Weather Breaking Down the Work LCCT Packages Would Contributes to the Early Delivery of Project 82 83 83 84 82

6.10 6.11 6.12 6.13

Opinion on Fast Track Approach Benefit in Terms of Time Opinion on Fast Track Approach Benefit in Terms of Quality Opinion on Fast Track Approach Benefit in Terms of Cost Views on Influence of Fast Track Approach in LCCT Schedule; Would It Help to Early Completion Of Project

84

xvi

LIST OF FIGURES (CONTD)

FIGURES NO. 6.14

TITLE

PAGE

Opinion on Weather Fast Track Approach Could Expedite the Overall Work Process in LCCT Project 85

6.15 6.16

Passengers Movement at MAHB Airports in Future Years Base Passengers Forecast at MAHB Airports in Future Years Project commercial revenue growth (RM million) Details of commercial revenue (RM 000) Summary of Scheduling Simulator for Work Closer Programme without Incorporating Enhance Design i.e. PVD Spacing 96 97 87 87 90 90

6.17 6.18 6.19

6.20

Comparison of FTA Schedule with Simulator Schedule (Without Closer PVD Spacing) Task Summary of Scheduling Simulator without Incorporating Schedule Compression Element Comparison of FTA Schedule with Simulator Schedule (Without Schedule Compression Element)

6.21

100

6.22

101

6.23

Summary of Scheduling Simulator without Incorporating Dynamic Compactor (HIDPR Compactor) 104 105

6.24

Comparison of FTA Schedule with Simulator HIDPR Schedule (Without Construction Technology i.e. Compactor)

xvii

LIST OF FIGURES (CONTD)

6.25

Summary of Scheduling Simulator Without Finish to Overlapping of Activities and Program was Based on Start (FS) Basis 106 107 109

6.26 6.27

Comparison of FTA Schedule with Simulator Schedule (Without Overlapping of Activities Element) Overall Completion Period Comparison Between FTA Schedule with Simulator Schedules

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1

Introduction

Traditional construction process is normally understood as a process which is time consuming. Begins with the inception stage, the implementation of construction usually undergo other processes as well such as conceptual design and detail design, procurement exercise and construction stage. Being known as traditional system, the above processes are linked to time and in most cases, implementation by using these procedures is always exposed to delay.

In a high priority project, time is an essence and therefore delay would not be tolerated. Under critical circumstances, implementing Fast Track approach in compressing construction time is more preferable. In most cases, the methods that are popularly adopted in achieving early delivery are eliminating potential delays caused by sequential activities are concurrent engineering, selection of ideal procurement system, right designs as well as good planning off and on Site.

Why compression of construction time is so crucial until we need to find means in dealing with it? The answers lie beneath the set objectives involving the justification for compressing project duration using Fast Track method, ascertaining strategies to compress project task and evaluating the time saving of using Fast Track approach as compared to Traditional Approach for the project.

1.2

Background of the Study

The study is focused on the new Low Cost Carrier Terminal (LCCT) runway in Sepang, Selangor Darul Ehsan. The new Low Cost Carrier Terminal (LCCT) is located next to Runway 2 of Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) in Sepang, Selangor. Initially developed by the Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad, the aviation facilities were first constructed in 1992. The airport was then known as one of the most sophisticated airports in Asia and the reputation runs high till to date.

Scope of works showing Runway 3 location

Figure 1.1: Site Location Map Source: KLIACS Project Management Department

The KLIA airport has two runways, Runway 1 and Runway 2.

Currently,

the facilities of runway 2 are shared with the normal cost carriers and low cost carriers. Due to the increasing demand of the low cost carrier services nowadays, the capacity of Runway 2 is foreseen to become insufficient in the near future and hence, a new runway dedicated specially to the low cost carriers is now really in need.

3 1.3 Problem Statement

The new Low Cost Carrier Terminal (LCCT) is currently one of the Governments priority projects which involve the national interest. Having targeted to be fully completed in the second quarter of 2012, the task of implementing the runway construction is so crucial demanding a compressed construction time for completion and therefore, the usage of fast track approach is unavoidable in meeting the tight schedule.

Reviewing back the Airport Masterplan established in year 1992, the operation of the runway 3 shall commence in year 2010 and the worries of inability to fulfill with the said blueprint planning had cropped up since year 2008. Without looking back, Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad (MAHB) had to look forward to completing the new runway soonest possible as the original schedule was slipped and trailed. In addition, the growing demands from the operators of low cost carrier such as AirAsia and FireFly had put the onus on the client i.e. MAHB to deliver the plan as targeted. The continuous pressure has resulted in the provision of the temporary Low Cost Carrier Terminal which is still in use until now. As the low cost carrier service is becoming more and more popular and affordable to the public, the pressure has coming to the apex of the situation which has resulted in the decision of proceeding with the construction of new Runway 3 as said earlier.

As time is running out, there is no other ways of implementing the project except by using the Fast Track approach which mainly attributed by schedule compression, practical procurement system, enhanced designs, etcetera all of which applied from the conceptual stage up to the construction implementation. The usual goal of schedule compression to the client is to shorten the overall schedule duration by the necessary amount at the least cost (AGC,1994). Keeping to this philosophy, the Fast Track approach was introduced and applied throughout the life cycle of project implementation of Runway 3 for low cost carrier operators.

1.4

Scope of Study

The scope of work for this study is focused on the implementation of Runway 3 only and this covers major elements as follows:-

1. 2. 3. 4.

Site Clearing and Enabling Works Ground Treatment Works Earthworks and Platform Preparation Pavement and Drainage Works

The parameter of study has been limited to stipulated stage of construction, from the design stage until the completion of the project for operational.

1.5

Aim and Objective of Study

The aim of this study is to justify the needs of implementing the Fast Track approach as well as to gauge the effectiveness of the approach towards achieving time saving required for the early delivery of the New LCCT Runway project.

To achieve the above aim, the following objectives have been identified:

1.

To investigate the needs and rationale for Fast Track Approach in LCCT project.

2.

To investigate the strategies of using Fast Track Approach in LCCT project.

3.

To evaluate the time saving of using Fast Track approach compared to Traditional approach.

5 1.6 Brief Methodology

The process flow of the methodology of this study is represented diagrammatically in figure 1.2 below:

Document Search KLIA & LCCT Master Plan. Other documents pertaining with LCCT Project. Master Implementation Programme used in the implementation of LCCT Project (Microsoft office)

Develop Scheduling Modelling Simulator (Microsoft Project) based on: Traditional work process. Without construction technology. Without design. improved time

Literature Review Interviews and Questionnaires pertaining to the research

Without compression element.

Select relevant scope of works in accordance with the scope and parameter of studies.

Data Input

Scheduling Modelling Simulator

Data Analysis

Results

Conclusion

Figure 1.2: Research Methodology Flow Chart

1.7

Organization of Dissertation

The dissertation is structured into six (6) chapters. In Chapter One, a brief introduction and importance of the study is given along with the aims, objectives and scope of study. A brief framework of the research is also given in this chapter.

Secondary tier of basic knowledge and significance of the topic of study gained via books and journals are given in Chapter Two. Theoretical aspects of the research are also discussed briefly.

In Chapter Three, the methodology adopted to achieve the aims and objectives of the study is explained.

Chapter Four will be discussing on the Case Study in detailed as well as justifying the needs of implementing the Fast Track Approach as against the Traditional Approach.

In Chapter Five, methodology of establishing scheduling simulators is discussed and these include the calculation of weightage & constant factors as well as ways to input data.

A complete finding of the study is presented in Chapter Six. It also includes the outcomes and quantitative data analysis that are specifically linked to the issues as discussed.

Chapter Seven will present Conclusion to the findings with particular emphasis on the contribution attributed by the research and recommendation for future research.

CHAPTER II

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1

Introduction

Completing projects quickly is critical to success in many markets. Fast track projects perform phases concurrently to reduce project duration. Successfully implementing fast track projects has proven difficult partially due to unanticipated complex interactions among project processes that drive performance. The fast track approach explicitly covers development activities, process concurrence, resources, scope, targets and iteration in and among four development phases. All the said elements which interact each other are critical in determining the path of the project progress and eventually affecting the project durations. The effective

implementations of all elements are therefore important in reducing project duration.

2.2

Definition of Fast Track

Fast tracking is generally defined as the compression of the design and/or construction schedule through overlapping of activities or reduction in activity durations (Clough and Sears 1991). A standard fast-track process is to divide the design and construction activities into work packages, such that certain packages can be completed and construction started before the entire design is complete. In some

8 cases, fast tracking involves beginning construction on a package before the design is even completed.

Activities that should be considered for overlapping include activities on the critical path and those activities with a high duration variance. These activities provide the greatest opportunity for reducing the overall schedule.

2.3

Fundamental Strategy of Fast Track Approach

One key to reducing project delivery time is management of the interface between design and construction. Another key is the management of the knowledge transfer between design and construction activities. The manufacturing industry has recognized this fact and has developed concurrent engineering principles to integrate the design and manufacturing processes. This has lead to 20 to 50 percent reductions in product development times (Blackburn 1991; Clark and Fujimoto 1991; Eldin 1997). However, the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry generally views design and construction as separate entities with little or no coordination between the designers and builders (de la Garza et al. 1994; Hastak et al. 1993; Williams 1995). This view is counterproductive to an attempt to minimize the overall project delivery time, as it results in local optima within the design or construction components of the project. A fundamental strategy for reducing project delivery times is to overlap traditionally sequential activities. The degrees to which activities (whether design or construction) may be overlapped is defined by the nature of the information exchange between those activities. Concurrent engineering literature (Krishnan et al. 1997; Loch and Terwiesch 1998) describes this information exchange between an upstream task and a downstream task in terms of the natural rate of information development in each task and the sensitivity of the downstream task to changes in upstream information. These concurrent engineering concepts can be extended from

9 the static manufacturing environment and adapted with the use of information technology for use on the dynamic interface between design and construction.

In order to achieve the desired goals, fast tracking advocates concurrent, overlapped processes instead of sequential product and process design (Prasad 1996). The extent to which two activities (Prasad 1996; Yassine et al. 1999). Prasad (1996) describes four types of relationships that are possible between activities:

(1) Dependent activities, (2) Semi-independent activities, (3) Independent activities, and (4) Interdependent activities.

For dependent activities, one activity requires information from a second activity before the first activity can be started. Semi-independent activities are characterized by one activity requiring only partial information from other activities before it can begin. Independent activities require no information from one activity before the other activity can begin. Interdependent activities require a two-way information exchange between the activities before either can be completed. Figure 2.1 illustrates these relationships.

Activity A

Activity B

Dependent Activities rely on one-way exchange of information

10

Activity A

Activity B

Semi-independent Activities rely on one-way exchange of partial information

Activity A Activity B

Independent Activities require no exchange of information

Activity A

Activity B

Interdependent Activities require two-way exchange of information Figure 2.1: Activity Relationships

Among the four possible activity relationships, only independent can be overlapped without any risk of delay or rework. For the other three activity relationship types, there is risk associated with overlapping activities. Semiindependent activities have the least risk associated with overlapping, since the downstream activity requires only partial information from the upstream activity. As soon as the required information is determined, the downstream activity can start with little or no risk involved. Interdependent activities will always be at risk of delay or rework, regardless of the amount of overlap, since they rely on two-way

11 information exchange between activities. The greatest risk of delay or rework associated with the overlapping of activities is for dependent activities. When two activities are dependent, the downstream activity relies on information from the upstream activity. When dependent activities are overlapped, the downstream activity must begin before all the information is available from the upstream activity. Overlapping dependent activities increases the risk of delay or rework that results from changes in the upstream activity that affect assumptions made when starting the downstream activity. Increased communication and exchange of preliminary information becomes very important when overlapping dependent activities.

2.4

Methodology of Implementing Fast Track Approach

This section presents the proposed methodology in achieving fast track delivery of the project.

In general, the methodology of this study will outline the following approaches:-

1.

Developing a process for overlapping dependent. By providing a formalized process for overlapping traditionally sequential activities, this work is the first step in eventually automating the process.

2.

The proposed methodology incorporates existing information technology tools, where available, including network scheduling programs.

3.

Design is also an essence in expediting the work process. In dealing with the site conditions, some of the obstacles have to be seriously identified, recognized and contemplated so as to establish the right solutions in facing the on-site challenges. One of the main problems foreseen in the case study is the soil condition where the Runway 3 is going to be built where most of the site area is sitting on peat soil and treatment is therefore inevitable. The study will review the methodology being used in fronting

12 the issue as well as steps that being taken so as to optimize the design and giving fair value for money to the Client.

4.

Planning is another crucial factor prior to implementing the work process. Not only need we to plan for the overall project schedule, planning shall also covers site activities, haulage roads, borrow source management, etc.

2.5

Selection of Ideal Procurement System in Fast Track Approach

The introduction of different fast-tracking project procurement systems is the attempt by the industry to provide better deal to its clients or customers, who are increasingly insisting for better value for money from their projects in terms of cost, time and quality. The different project procurement systems present different methods, process and procedure of designing and construction of projects for the Client.

There are many procurement systems being used in the construction industry now days. However the focus is only on the type of procurement systems that commonly used in Malaysia now days i.e. traditional system; design and build method, management contracting method and professional construction management method. The parameters for the measurement of project performance are many, but in this case consideration is given to only three elements time, including speed of delivery, cost and quality.

Mastermann (1994) classify project procurement systems into several categories based on the relationship and critical interaction between design and construction responsibilities. The categorization of the various procurement systems are as follows :

1. 2. 3.

Separated and Cooperative System Integrated System Management Oriented System

13

The

different

category and

sub-classification

of

construction

project

procurement systems can be shown in Figure 2.5.1 below :

PROCUREMENT SYSTEMS

SEPARATED & COOPERATTIVE

INTEGRATED

MANAGEMENT ORIENTED

Traditional System

Variant of Trad. System

Design and Build

Variant of Des.. & Build

Management Contracting

Construction Management

Construction Management

Sequential Method

Accelerated Method

Package Deal

Turnkey Method

Develop & Construct

Figure 2.2: Category of Building Procurement Systems Source: Masterman J W E (1996) Building Procurement Systems: An Introduction

2.5.1

Separated and Cooperative Procurement Systems

Under this system, the responsibilities of designing and construction of the project are separated and are carried out by different independent organizations namely the designers and contractors. It is sometimes called linear or sequential contracting system or multiple responsibilities contracting approach. It is a system where the project development activities that start from feasibility study, preliminary design, documentation to construction and hand over, are carried out sequentially one after another. Traditionally, the complete working drawings or design has to be prepared by the designers before tender and construction activities can take place. It is sub-divided into 2 subcategories Traditional System and Variants of the Traditional Systems. The Variant System is further sub-divided into:

14 1. Sequential Method, and 2. Accelerated Method.

Under the sequential method or a single stage tendering approach, the building owner will appoint a team of consultants to act on his behalf to produce construction drawings, specification and tender document and to administer the tendering processes to select a contractor. Once selected and awarded the contract, the contractor will carry out based on the drawings and specification prepared by the clients consultants.

The accelerated method can be considered as an innovative approach to speed up the selection of contractor and the commencement of construction. The method can be divided into 2 sub-categories i.e. two-stage and negotiated tendering methods. Both methods involve preliminary discussion with selected few contractors, submission of fixed tender and/or cost negotiation.

2.5.2

Integrated Procurement Systems

This system, as the name implies, integrates or combines the responsibilities of design and construction of the project (Ashworth, 2001). Both responsibilities are contracted out to a single contracting organisation. It is also called a parallel or single responsibility procurement system whereby the client will only need to deal with a single organisation for both the designing and constructing the proposed project. In this case, the contractor will have to engage and be responsible for design and construction teams. Design and build system falls under this category of project procurement system. Under this system, the client together with is/her consultants will prepare a tender or bidding document that include the project brief and clients requirements and invite a number of contractors to bid.

For the purpose of submitting tenders, the invited contractors will produce their own design, construction and cost proposal. Very often the successful contractor will into a contract based on lump sum price and a fixed duration (Ashworth, 2001; Edmond, 2003)

15 The variation or innovation to this mode of project delivery systems includes:

(1) Package deal (2) Turnkey (3) Develop and construct.

These systems that entail the contractor to be responsible for both the design and construction of the project, allow for the early start of construction through the reduction of the pre-tender activities as such they reduce process time.

Package deal or commonly called the all in contracting is a type of procurement method where a contractor is given the responsibility for everything that is required and necessary for the design, construction and delivery of the project. Under this system, the services of the contractor will include the preparation of project brief, sketch and final working drawings, getting all the approval from authorities, project financing, construction, furnishing and commissioning of all equipments and accessories and handing over the project to the client.

Turnkey contract is an American term for all in or package contract. Under this arrangement, a contractor is commissioned to undertake the responsibilities for everything necessary and required for the construction, completion, commissioning and hand over the project. The word turnkey means that, upon completion, the client is given the key and he can then enter the project by turning the key. The contractor will have to do everything from preparing project brief, getting approval, designing, financing, construction, furnishing and decorating to commissioning and handing over completed, cleaned and ready for use project (Allen, 2001).

Develop and construct is another of the integrated procurement approach which is very much similar to design and build. In this case, the contractor is still given the responsibility for both the design and construction of the project. The difference is that, under this method the clients design consultants prepare the concept sketches or designs and passed them to the contractor who will develop them and produced the detailed working drawings. The contractor will then construct and complete the project based on what it has developed and produced.

16 2.5.3 Management Oriented Procurement Systems

It is a system that gives greater emphasis on the management and integration of the design and construction of projects. Under this system, the management of the design and construction a project is contracted out to a contractor who acts as a management consultant on behalf of the client. The construction itself is commissioned to many specialist or sub-contractors who enter into contract with either the management contractor or the client. This procurement approach that was introduced based on the conception that a builder or contractor has more expertise to manage the design and construction of a project. As management consultant, the appointed contractor does not itself, carry out the design or construction of the project. Its main responsibility is to manage the design and construction by the design consultants and the many specialist contractors, respectively.

There are three types of procurement method that fall under the category of Management Oriented Procurement Systems, they are:

1) Management contracting 2) Construction management 3) Design and manage

Management contracting and construction management contracting are forms of fast-tracking procurement approach whereby a contractor is contracted and paid a fee to manage, procure and supervise the construction of a project rather than to build the project. The actual construction works are contracted out to many package or specialist contractors. Under this arrangement the management contractor is employed as a construction consultant to be part of the clients team. The main difference between contract management and construction management contracting is that in the former, the package contractors are in contract with the management contractor. In the latter, the package contractors (specialist sub-contractors) are in contract with the client or building owner.

Under the design and manage system, a single organization or firm is commissioned to be responsible for designing the project and managing its

17 construction. The firm is does carry out the work itself, but it is contracted out to a number of specialist sub-contractors or package contractors, who enter into contract with the client. A design and manage firm or company is engaged as a consultant for the client and become a member of the project team.

2.6

The Process of the Various Procurement Systems

It is appropriate at this juncture to view the process or flow of activities of the different procurement systems. They have, to a certain extent, indicated the effect of the different procurement system on the project performance, specifically on the duration of the project development and the starting point of the construction. They also show the allocation of duties and responsibilities between the client, design and construction consultants and contractor/s. For comparison purposes, please refer Figure 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 in this and next page.

Project brief

Feasibility study

Concept design

Detail design

Tender & contract

Construction

Commission & handover

Client & Consultants responsibility

Contractors responsibility

Figure 2.3 The Linear or Sequential Process of the Traditional Procurement System

18

Project brief

Feasibility study

Tender documentation

Concept design

Tender and contracting

Construction

Commission & hand over

Detail design

Client & Consultants responsibility

Contractors responsibility

Figure 2.4 The Integrated Process of Project Designing and Construction in the Design and Build Procurement System

Detail design and/or shop drawings

Project brief

Feasibility study

Tender doc. & client require

Concept design

Bidding & Contracting

Construction

Commission & hand over

Package Contractors responsibility Client & Consultants responsibility Management contractors responsibility

Figure 2.5 The Process of Project Designing and Construction in the Management Contracting & Professional Construction Management Procurement System

2.6.1

The Effect of the Different Procurement Systems on Project Performance

After having considered the concept and the working process and procedure of the different project procurement systems, let us now look into the general effect of the different system on project performance. As highlighted earlier, the focus of this section is on three procurement systems i.e.:-

19 (1) Traditional system (2) Design and Build and Turnkey Procurement Systems (3) Management Contracting and Professional Construction Management Systems.

The discussion is limited to the main project performance parameters - time, cost and quality.

1.

Traditional Procurement System

Time

Due to its linear or sequential approach, the traditional procurement system has been identified as the slowest project delivery approach. However, this approach is more preferable because it provides clear accountability and better design and construction control by the client. Since the pre-contract stage of this system is longer, more time is available for the client and the project team to scrutinize and review the design before construction.

Cost

This system provides more price certainty to the client at the very early stage of the project. It also gives the client firmer and more competitive price because the design plus the complete working drawings have been fully developed and detailed out prior to tendering. It eliminates any design or construction ambiguity or uncertainty which often causes the contractors to unnecessarily inflate the price. In the case where bill of quantities is used, the bidding tend to be more fair as such the project cost is also lower. The system also better cost control as such cost increase due to variations is minimized, but works were often disrupted when there are too many variations (due to unforeseeable problems) and it tend to cause the cost to inflate. (Masterman, 1996)

20

Quality

The traditional procurement system also provides a high degree of quality certainty and functional standards. It is also a system that provides an opportunity for the building owner to combine the best design, management and construction expertise between consultants and contractor. It also provide more time for client and consultants to review and fully develop the design and specification thus allowing better documentation preparation. However, this system does not provide opportunities for contractor to contribute his construction technology and management expertise because they only come into the scene after the design has been fully developed and approved.

2.

Design and Build and Turnkey Procurement Systems

Time

Design and build and turnkey project procurement system are called fasttracking or build-it-fast project delivery system where the design and construction are integrated. The design free pre-tender process allow for earlier construction date. It also allows the process of detail design and construction to run almost in parallel and concurrently to each other, thus reducing the overall project development period considerably. As a single entity responsible for both the design and construction, the contractor is able to control not only the construction time but also the time reserved for the design of the project, thus reducing the overall contract duration. In this type of procurement system, the contractor has always been selected based on its vast experience, knowledge and competency in construction, as such by giving it the design responsibility, the contractor very often able to reduce construction time. This is done by him rationalizing the design and construction process and site activities.

21 Cost

Although the cost is fixed at the tender stage and is subject to design changes, it is often higher than the traditional contracting system. Apart from the fact that very limited contractors are invited to submit tenders, the lack of designand specification detailing during tender, has made the contractors to jack up the price to allow for many uncertainties. This is because once accepted, the tender price will be the final contract sum. It is not subject to change, unless there are variations required or instructed by the client. Such additional cost cannot be avoided because under this procurement system the contractor will to take much of the financial risk.

However, as many have claimed, the significant cost saving in this type of procurement system is made through the reduction of the overall development period. The cost of contractors uncertainty can be set-off by the reduction in loan interest and early financial return or benefits.

Cost saving may also be made when the contractor applies his construction knowledge and experience to simplify design and work. At the same further cost saving can be made when the client offer the contractor some form of incentive if he is able to save a significant amount of cost.

Quality

The integration of design and construction allows the contractor to utilize his knowledge and experience to develop much compacted and coherent work program and to develop more efficient design and project control programme. At the same time it allows the contractor to be innovative to further improve the construction process and techniques thus allowing for better work and process quality.

However, it is more often found that the quality of work under this contracting system tend to be questionable. The assigning of the designing and construction to a contractor has caused the client to loose control of the design and supervision of the work. This is especially so when the client does have his own team of consultants. As far the contractor is concerned, they tend to cut corners in order to

22 maximize their profit, especially when they feel that they have under price their quotation during when tendering for the work.

3.

Management Contracting and Professional Construction Management Systems

(Both systems operate almost on the same concept, except that in Management Contracting, the package contractors enter into contract with the management contractor. In Construction Management System, the Package Contractors enter into contract with the client)

Time

As mentioned earlier, the essence of these two methods of project procurement is that a contractor has the knowledge, experience and competency to better manage the design and construction of a project. It is a factor that allows for more efficient and effective coordination of works, materials, manpower and plants, thus making construction time shorter compared to other procurement systems. This is especially so, given the fact that the same management contractor is able to manage and contribute towards the development of the design. It allows the management contractor to improve buildability or constructability.

At the same, the system also allow for early start of construction compared to the traditional approach. The preparation of simple or basic tender (bidding) document and the shift of the process of schematic and detail design to construction phase, allow for an early start of construction. As pointed earlier, under these two systems, the detail design (shop drawings) is carried out (either by the consultant or package contractors) during the construction stage. All these factors brought about a considerable reduction of the overall project time compared to the traditional or even design and build contracting systems.

23 Cost

The cost of the project procured using this system tends to be lower than those using other procurement approach. This is because the cost of the project is actually the sum of prices quoted by the package contractors. With the management contractor being the consultant, no extra cost is being added up for main contractors profit margin. The only additional cost is the consultant fee that the client has to pay to the management contractor or to the construction management consultant.

Quality

As an agent responsible for the construction, the management contractor or the professional construction manager tend to be more serious with the standard and quality of the work done by the package contractors. Their experience as contractor or construction manager made them more proficient and more effective in ensuring high quality works. Their knowledge and experience also made them more adept in selecting materials and components of the right type and quality. These factors have contributed to a better standard and quality of the completed construction products.

2.7

Schedule Compression

Schedule compression is defined as a reduction from the normal experienced time or optimal time typical for the type and size project being planned within a given set of circumstances by the CII (1990), the primary reasons for compressing or accelerating the schedule of a construction project can be attributed to the following reasons:

a) Reducing total design-construct time from that considered normal; b) Accelerating a schedule following owners request; and c) Recovering lost time after falling behind schedule

24

The necessity to implement either planned or unplanned schedule compression is very frequently found in todays construction environment. Planned schedule compression is defined as schedule compression that was anticipated and planned for before the start of the construction phase of the project, whereas unplanned schedule compression is defined as schedule compression that was not anticipated and planned for before the start of construction. Unplanned schedule compression is commonly a result of some form of unanticipated change to the originally planned scope of the work or construction schedule.

The determination of the most effective and economical way to achieve these requirements, in terms of labour productivity, is usually the most essential because project labour generally represent the most variable and largest percentage of the total project progress.

2.8

Tools in Assisting and Developing Fast Track Approach in Planning and Scheduling

The study will also be partly touching the tools /software being selected in assisting and automating the fast track approach. As the crucial task of meeting the timeline is not tolerable, the optimization of the software had also adopted the ingression of comprehensive Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), the purpose of which to further segregating the tasks and processes into smaller components in order to facilitate the project management process. The break down generally involves the following areas:-

1. 2. 3. 4.

Area of responsibilities Distinct element of works Location of the Site Category of work distinguishing by craft or equipments

25 2.9 Design Criteria for Fast Track Approach

Another criterion that needs to be emphasized in meeting early delivery of project is design that will help accelerate the construction duration of a project. A dynamic design will be adopted to deal with uncertainty of site conditions. For instance, in the LCCT work site, through the Site Investigation report, it was found that the soil type is so soggy and most of the runway area was full of peat soil as well as bio-mass left over resulted from cut palm oil trees from the Sepang area plantation.

Further to the early investigations, the MAHB with the requests from the Consultants has agreed to carry out further comprehensive studies and investigations involving numerous boreholes and borelog readings. After detailed evaluation, designs parameters were established and proposals were forwarded to the Client for approval. Local and international geotechnical experts were also called to give their professional opinions pertaining to the issue.

After serious deliberation, most of the experts had agreed that the soil treatment process has to be carried out in order to ensure that the soil is truly ready to receive the live and dead loads from the pavement as well as the airplanes during take-off and landing.

There are several means of dealing with the scenario. Under normal engineering process, the soil has to be treated in the following sequence:-

1.

The existing bio-mass materials and peat (unsuitable materials) have to be excavated and extracted out prior to the earthfilling process in order to ease the settlement process.

2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Sand blanket is prepared for drainage purposes Earthfilling with approved soil Allow the soil to surcharge Cut surplus surcharge materials Pavement works take place

26 By adhering to the above engineering designs, the surcharge process will approximately takes one year to be fully settled and definitely, the delivery will be severely affected.

Series of discussions and brainstorming were held to contemplate the issue and the decision made by the management was to re-look at the designs comprehensively as time is an essence and delay would tarnish the image of the nation.

Consequence upon the above, the Consultants have come out with their counter proposals of the following methods of statement:-

1.

The existing bio-mass materials and peat (unsuitable materials) have to be excavated and extracted out prior to the earthfilling process in order to ease the settlement process.

2. 3.

Sand blanket is prepared for drainage purposes Pre-fabricated vertical drain is installed to accelerate the discharge of hydrology elements from the soil

4.

Earthfilling with approved soil with larger quantities to allow more counterfeit weight in virtue of expediting the surcharge process. Sides counter berms fill were also allowed for similar reason.

7.

Compaction by using special machineries called High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling machines.

5. 6. 7.

Allow the soil to surcharge in more accelerated period Cut surplus surcharge materials Pavement works take place

With the new designs approach, the surcharge period has been tremendously reduced to only six months instead of twelve months as designed earlier. Eventually, all parties were agreeable to this proposal as the time saving was significant and henceforth, the target aimed on the delivery of the project is finally achieved.

Notwithstanding the above decision, the new Fast Track approach via enhanced designs suffers from several setbacks as follows:

27 1. The construction cost is higher attributable from the additional points of pre-fabricated vertical drain cost, cost of machineries resulted from the usage of High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling machines as well as larger quantities of earthwork to expedite the surcharge process 2. 3. Higher Consultants fees for re-designing. Longer time in making decisions resulting from series of discussions, brainstorming and technical workshops.

2.10

Conclusion

Premised on the foregoing, it is very important at the very outset of the project to carefully consider all factors when selecting the most appropriate implementation approach for the case study. This is because each system has its own feature and peculiarity that will have effect on the cost and time of the project. Traditional work process normally understood to be of advantage in terms of cost as against the Fast Track process which is more synonyms to higher cost contributor.

Nevertheless, detailed evaluation shall be carried out so as to ascertain the tolerable degree of acceptance on both approaches and it is actually a case to case situation because in some cases, delivery of the project is intolerable and therefore, the usage of Fast Track approach is inevitable.

28

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1

Introduction

This chapter discusses in details the research procedures from how the data was collected until how it is processed and analyzed to achieve the objectives and scopes of the study.

3.2

Literature Review

In the literature review, the main information sources are gathered from text books and journals which are related to the study. Academic journals information includes introduction and presentation for scrutiny of the new research, and the critique of existing research. Content typically takes the form of articles presenting original research, review articles, and book reviews. The third information sources are gathered from the internet. The internet carries a vast array of information academic resources, notably the interlinked hypertext documents.

29

3.3

Document Search

Document Search study was conducted on the documents that contained necessary information related to this LCCT project. Among the documents being studied are KLIA Masterplan, LCCT overall implementation reports and policies as well as LCCT Master Implementation Programme.

3.4

Interview The interviews with key personnel involved in the project have been done in

order to obtain their professional views of the problem and need statements. This exercise includes but not limited to Head of Departments of the Clients, Project Managers and Consultants.

3.5

Questionnaire Survey A set of questionnaire has been designed and disbursed to technical

department staff in order to get their feedback. Questionnaire is divided into two sections, namely section one is to obtain the respondents background. This is to ensure the respondents are qualified personnel directly involved in the industry and able to give answers to the questionnaires reflecting the current practices. The second section consists of questionnaires structured into detail questions on issues discussed.

3.6

Development of Scheduling Simulator

Another methodology used in this study is by using scheduling simulators. The purpose of the simulators is to compare with the Master Implementation Programme (based on Fast Track approach) in order to determine the time saving achieved by the Fast Track approach.

30

The scheduling simulators prepared generally comprise of Traditional approach elements and from the evaluation, the duration of time saving is established.

3.7

Analysis and Results

All data and information gathered from the data collected were analyzed comprehensively. Emphasis has been given on the effectiveness of Fast Track Approach in achieving time saving. Also touched are the strategies in implementing the Fast Track system. In this respect, evaluation has been carried out on all aspects of construction including time, cost, resources, etcetera.

For the time saving evaluation, the two approaches i.e. Fast Track and Traditional systems were compared side by side with the criteria involving time where the Master Implementation Programme (MIP) incorporating Fast Track elements serves as the benchmark for comparison with the simulator schedules representing Traditional approach elements.

For the Interview, the Content Analysis would be summarized in table form and all the answers from the respondents would be incorporated therein.

As for the Questionnaires Survey, the input from the respondents would be analyzed as follows:-

3.7.1

Relative Index

The technique is used to compute the strength of indices of the responds between questions within the particular section in the questionnaire. The ranking of importance between the various issues would therefore be

31 identified. Mathematically Relative Index is computed using the following formula:

Relative Index (R.I) = 1n 1 + 2n 2 + 3n 3 + 4n 4 + 5n 5 5N

Legend:

N n1 n2 n3 n4 n5

= = = = = =

total number of respondents frequency of Strongly Disagree response frequency of Disagree response frequency of Neutral response frequency of Agree response frequency of Strongly Agree response

The Relative Index would yield value ranging from 0.2 to 1.0 where 0.2 indicates lowest/weakest respond and 1.0 indicates highest/strongest respond.

3.8

Conclusion & Recommendation

At this stage, conclusion and recommendation were drawn out based on the results of the overall analysis obtained for the benefit of the research specifically and the construction industry as a whole.

32

CHAPTER IV

CASE STUDY

4.1

Introduction

One key factor to reducing project delivery time is management of the interface between packages and activities in construction. Another key is the management of the knowledge transfer between design and construction activities. The manufacturing industry has recognized this fact and has developed concurrent engineering principles to integrate the design and manufacturing processes. This has lead to 20 to 50 percent reductions in product development times (Blackburn 1991; Clark and Fujimoto 1991; Eldin 1997).

Emulating the above philosophy of the manufacturing industry, the approach was vastly applied in the construction industry nowadays with similar objective of achieving compressed delivery period. The case study i.e. the New LCCT Development in Sepang is one (1) of the examples of construction project requiring early delivery for technical and commercial reasons.

The New LCCT Runway project is owned by Malaysia Airports Holding Berhad, a Government Linked Company (GLC) which carries the interest of the Government in aeronautical industry. For this project, the client has appointed KLIACS Sdn. Bhd. as its Project Management consultants which involved in the planning, procurement and implementation processes. Further, other consultants

33 were appointed for each package for the design, procurement as well as implementation.

Generally, in meeting the tight schedule, the project is implemented in Fast Track approach where the works were separated into various packages which run concurrently in Start to Start basis and these involved not only in the design stage but also in the procurement and the construction stage. The said packages are briefly given as follows:

a) Site Preparation and Enabling works b) Earthworks and Ground Treatment works i) ii) iii) iv) Package EW01 Package EW01A Package EW02A Package EW02B

c) Pavement Works i) ii) Package AF01 Package AF02

The whole packages breakdown could be seen in detail in the Master Implementation schedule in the Appendices section of this report.

4.2

Background of Site Condition and General Geology

The existing site is generally flat and low-lying and is currently planted with palm oil trees. The usual earth-drains exist at a grid in the plantation for the purpose of irrigation. From observations done during site visits the existing earth tracks showed some approximately 300mm to 500mm level differences compared to the plantation levels indicating the occurrence of ground settlement. Peat and organic materials was also obvious from the existing irrigation drains.

34

Figure 4.1: Geological Map of KLIA Site

The country geological formation of the site (refer Figure 4.1) as reported from the available documents and geological map of Peninsular Malaysia, 8th Edition, 1985 is Kenny Hill Formation of Carboniferous to Permian age. The formation consists of a monotonous clastic sequence of interbedded shale, mudstone and sandstone. The light yellowish colour sandstone is thickly bedded while the dark colour shale is laminated and thin to massive bedded. The shale and mudstone are phyllitic with foliation and incipient cleavage at an angle to the bedding.

35 The formation overlies the Silurian Kuala Lumpur Limestone unconformably, and is overlain by Quartenary alluvium. It was reported that the alluvium is mainly Clay of marine origins. The Clay is than overlain by peat, humic clay and silt in certain locality.

4.3

Soil Investigation Input

A geotechnical investigation program was carried out at the proposed locations of Runway 3 and its associated taxiways. The purpose of the investigation work is to study the soil condition at the proposed embankment platform location in order to provide design recommendation for the foundations improvement and slopes design. The soil investigation program includes field works consisting of deep boreholes, piezocone tests and field vane tests. Specific laboratory tests were also carried out on selected samples obtained from the boreholes.

4.3.1

Subsoil Profile

Generally, the sub-soil consists of very soft clay or very soft sandy clay with decayed wood with SPT-N value varying from 0 blows - 3 blows per 300mm penetration. The thickness of this soil layer varies from 10.5m to 27m. Very hard sandy silt, sandy clay or sand with SPT-N values more than 50blows per 300mm can be expected from 22.5m to 31.5m. However at borehole B1, very stiff sub-soil (N > 30 blows) at 36.36m below ground level. Generally, the thickness of soft sediments increases towards the north of the proposed Runway 3. The recorded ground water level varies from 0.46m - 1.60m below ground level.

To be practical and assuming a target settlement of 90% _T the estimated consolidation time would need to be accelerated. Adopting the use of preloading would be justified to minimize the cost, practical and would make the post construction settlement manageable. It is also proposed that prefabricated vertical

36 drains (PVD) are introduced in conjunction with the preloading at these locations to accelerate the consolidation time.

4.3.2

Proposed Ground Treatment Scheme: Preloading with Prefabricated Vertical Drains (PVD)

Preloading with PVD to accelerate the consolidation process in order to minimize post construction settlement is proposed. Details for the two options are tabulated in table below.

Table 4.1: Summary of Proposed Ground Treatment Details in LCCT Project

Propose d Rest Period / PreLoading (mths) 4 Surcharge Fill Height (m) 3.0 2.5 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.5 PVD Spacing Triangular (c/c-m) 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 14500X to 16400X PVD Length (m) 16400X 17100X to to 17100X 19500X

Zone

Expected Percent Consolidation, U (%)

1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3

90 70 70 90 80 80 90 85 80

20

12

15

20

12

15

20

12

15

37

Figure 4.2: Photograph showing the progress of installation of Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) at Package EW02A, LCCT Project

Figure 4.3: Photograph of Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) driving rigs at Package EW02A, LCCT Project

38

4.4

Alternative Construction Technology for Compaction

Compaction of the main bulk of the fill shall be carried out by using the High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling (HIDPR) method. The HIDPR compaction is done to accelerate the earthworks, ensure high strength fill to provide adequate subgrade for the Runway and Taxiways pavement. Earth fill shall be spread at optimum moisture content + or 2% in layers of 1.20m with dozers or similar spreading equipment. All earth work areas shall be provided with adequate temporary drainage to ensure drainage of runoff during construction and avoid deterioration of the fill during placing and compaction. The compaction shall achieve a maximum dry density of 95% throughout the fill and shall not induce any cracking of the fill.

For every lift, sampling and density testing shall be carried out at a maximum average grid spacing of 70m x 70m platform filling. Should any area fail to meet the density requirements, the contractor shall propose to the Engineer a method of rectification to achieve the specified density requirements and shall at his own cost carry out the rectification works to the Engineers satisfaction. Besides density testing, the Engineer may also direct samples to be taken for other tests such as unconfined compression and consolidated-undrained tests.

HIDPR compaction shall be carried out using approved compaction modules of minimum weight 16tones, traveling at speeds of not less than 12km/hr. The compaction modules shall be fitted with a Continuous Ground Response Meter (Compactometer or similar) indicating in real-time the coverage of the site and the ground response obtained by the module. The continuous ground response meter is essential to ensure that the entire site is covered by the HIDPR compaction adequately.

39 Initial trials shall be conducted where necessary to assess the optimum level of passes to obtain a high level of compaction through out the depth of the platform fill. The trails shall validate that a minimum of 95% Modified Dry Density can be achieved throughout the depot of the fill layer. A method statement will be submitted prior to the commencement of the trails and subsequent deep lift compaction works. Unconfined compression tests on samples of the compacted fill shall also be carried out and the unconfined compressive strength of the compacted fill shall not be less than 200kPa.

Sufficient equipment shall be deployed on site to achieve the Clients project schedules. The equipment shall be able to travel on loose or soft fill without loosing traction or bogging down.

With the time constraint faced by the client, the consulting Engineer has came out with the proposal of adopting the compaction technology method named High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling (HIDPR) by using the special compaction machineries.

This technology was invented in Australia and has been internationally tested and recognized. Using the HIDPR compactor, the compaction per lift can be increased from traditionally 300 mm thick to 1200 mm thick layer per lift. Notwithstanding the extra thickness for compaction, the compaction and consolidation factor could still be achieved at 90% - 95% rate.

4.4.1

About the High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compactor Machine

Construction technology is one of the elements took place in expediting the earthwork process. In this means, compaction or earth is one of the activities which constitute longest duration in the earthworks overall process. Using the normal

40 conventional roller, the layer of compaction per lift is limited to 300 mm per layer and in order to complete the filled earth into consolidation, the process of compaction has to be carried out 12 times, taking into consideration of the total filled thickness of 3.60 m. With the invented construction technology, the project team has decided that this critical activity need to be expedited and search for alternative compactor is inevitable.

The compactor for the dynamic compaction works consists of two main components: the Impact Compactor and the Engineering Tractor and it is illustrated in Figure 4.4. below.

Figure 4.4: Components of High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compactor Machine

The impact compactor is a non circular module with 3 sides which induces high energy when hitting the ground during rotation thus compacting the ground.

The engineering tractor is a high powered tractor which is used to tow the impact compactor in order to create the rotation needed to impact the ground.

41

The essential details of the components to be used for this project are:

a) Impact Compactor

Shape of wheel Working mass

: triangle : 16200KG

b) Engineering Tractor Power : 280kW

The dynamic compactor will be operated at travelling speed of 10-12 km/hr. with the consistent speed, a trial embankment compaction will be carried out to determine the suitable passes of compaction to the fill material.

The theory and principle employed in this method of compaction are briefly outlined below for information.

a) The dynamic compaction (also called impact compaction) can be described as the process whereby compaction effort is derived from the energy of the drum falling from a corner to a flat as the shaped (non-circular) drum is towed along the ground.

b) Because of the high energy delivered by each blow, the dynamic compactor is capable of producing effective compaction in thickness greater than that of conventional compactor i.e. roller.

c) During the compaction process, the drums are towed along the ground at a relatively high speed of 10 to 12 km.hr, compared to conventional roller speeds of 2 to 3 km/hr. this operation causes the drums to rotate by contact with the ground and to alternatively rise up on their points and then fall downward onto their compacting faces. This action produces a series of high impact, high amplitude blows as show in Figure 4.5 below:

42

Figure 4.5: How the impact compactor works.

d) Compared to traditional roller, this compactor machine would be able to increase the lift thickness from 300m to 1200m with similar compaction rate of 90% 95%. This will allow a tremendous saving in time up to four times in comparison with the traditional compactor.

Figure 4.6: Photograph of High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compactor at work in Package EW02A, LCCT Project

43 4.5 Overview of KLIA and LCCT Passengers Capacity

The planning of KLIA began in1990 when the government decided that the existing Subang International Airport (now Sultan Abdul Aziz Shah Airport) could not handle future demand. Malaysias Former Minister Mahathir bin Mohamad was a prime driver behind the project, which was seen as an important component of the Multimedia Super Corridor.

The first phase of the airport was designed with the capacity of 25 million passengers per year but on the first full year of operations in 1999, it was only 13.2 million. However, traffic did eventually increase\e with 21.1 million passengers recorded in 2004 and 23.2 million in 2005-although this, too, fell short of the original estimate of 25 million by the year 2003.

Table 4.2: Data on Passengers Capacity of Current Terminal Building and After New LCCT is completed Source: MAHB Annual Report 2009 Passenger Terminal Buildings Totals Floor Area Handling Capacity (Current) 514,694 m2 40 million passenger (After LCCT Relocation) 692,627 m2 55 million passenger

Table 4.3: Handling Passengers Capacity of Current LCCT Source: MAHB Annual Report 2009 Low Cost Carrier Terminal (Current LCCT) Opened Floor Area Handling Passengers Capacity 23rd March 2006 (Operational) 35,290 m2 15 million

44 Table 4.4: Handling Passengers Capacity on Proposed New LCCT Source: MAHB Annual Report 2009 Low Cost Carrier Terminal (New Proposed LCCT) Opening on Floor Area Handling Passengers Capacity April 2012 242,000 m2 30 million

Shopping spots are available in an area encompassing 85,000 square metres. Currently, the retail space at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport stands at 63,644 square metres (685,060 sq ft). The airport operator plans to increase the retail space to 103,251 square metres (1,111,380 sq ft), and 62.2% increase in retail space. Malaysia Airports retail arm Eraman will boost retail shops to 277 from 242 and add more food and beverage outlets to 99 from 88 presently.

The first purpose built Low Cost Carrier Terminal (LCCT) was specifically built at KL International Airport to cater to the growing passengers of the low cost airlines, especially the passengers of Malaysias no-frills airlines, Air Asia. Construction of the LCCT Terminal was on a fast-track basis beginning June 2005 at an approximately cost of RM 108 million.

The 35,290 square metre terminals is designed and built to suit the low cost carrier business modal that requires only basis terminal amenities. In order of offer lower landing fees, handling fees and airport taxes, it cuts back on amenities such as aerobridges, elaborate physical structure and decorations in the passenger terminal buildings. There is no transfer facility to the main terminal. Passengers, who need to make transfer need to clear immigration, collect their luggage, cleat customs make their way to the main terminal and re-checking with the respective airlines.

45 LCCT is located on the opposite side of the apron from the Main Terminal Building, near the air cargo area. By road, LCCT is about 20 km from the Main Terminal Building.

However, the current Low Cost Carrier Terminal is only a temporary solution for the increasing demand of no-frills airline passengers. Therefore, Malaysia Airports Holdings Berhad has incorporated the plans to build a new permanent LCC terminal which can accommodate 30 million passengers per annum. In the mean time, the airport operator decided to expand the current terminal to cope up with the increasing demand. The new arrival hall was first open on December 15, 2008. This airport was the first airport to have separation between normal carriers and low cost carrier.

The terminal is due to be replaced by the new low cost carriers terminal, known as KLIA2 when the terminal comes on ground in April 2012.

4.6

KLIA Aeropolis Masterplan

Under the new Kuala Lumpur International Airport Masterplan, a new runway and a new satellite building will be constructed to accommodate the increasing number of passengers. The airport Phase 2 development plan is to handle 40 million-45 Million passengers per year by 2008 with the expansion of low cost carrier terminal. For phase 3, the airport will expand to handle 75 million-110 million) passengers per annum with the construction of a new satellite terminal and replacement of current low cost carrier terminal with a new low cost carrier terminal that will be capable of handling 30 million passengers alone. Under Phase 4, the airport will be capable to handle 130 million passengers per annum by 2020.

With the slight modification of the masterplan, the future Terminal 2's satellite terminal will be combined into one satellite terminal. The expansion of Terminal 2's satellite terminal will be exactly the same as Terminal 1's satellite

46 terminal, where initially the satellite terminal will have four arms, and another four arms when the terminal reached its capacity. There is sufficient land and capacity to develop facilities to handle up to 130 million passengers a year, five runways by the year 2020 and two mega-terminals, each linked with satellite terminals.

Table 4.5: Passengers and Aircraft movement in KLIA Source: MAHB Annual Report 2009. Year Passenger movement 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 6,524,405 13,172,635 14,732,876 14,538,831 16,398,230 17,454,564 21,058,572 23,213,926 24,570,385 26,938,970 27,529,355 29,682,093 Airfreight movements (tones) 156,641 417,068 510,594 440,864 527,124 586,195 651,747 653,654 677,446 649,197 649,076 584,559 64,123 116,589 109,925 113,590 127,952 139,590 164,483 182,537 183,869 193,982 209,681 225,251 Aircraft movements

With an increasing number of passengers using the 'Low Cost Carrier Terminal '(LCCT), MAHB has approved an expansion beginning early 2007 to accommodate more passengers as the current LCCT is nearly in full capacity.

The Low Cost Carrier Terminal is a temporary solution for budget travellers, MAHB has submitted a proposal to the Transport Ministry to build a new, permanent LCC hub in between the main terminal building and satellite building A to replace the present Low Cost Carrier terminal.

47

The capacity for the LCCT will increase from 10 million passengers a year to 15 million passengers a year. A proposal for a more permanent building to house a new LCCT has been submitted and expected to have a capacity for 30 to 35 million passengers a year. It is also expected that the new LCCT will be completed by 2012. It is expected that the current LCCT will be converted in to a cargo hub once the new terminal is completed.

According to news reports, the RM 2 billion terminal will be funded by the government as a part of the second economic stimulus package. The new terminal will be located 1.5 km from the current main terminal, will have 68 aircraft parking bays and a third runaway which is located 1.5 km from the second runaway. The new terminal is expected to be 242,000 square meter in size, with a retail space of 32,000 square meters. It will be able to accommodate 30 million passengers with provision to expand to 45 million passengers a year. There is also a possibility to include a rail extension for the Express Rail Link. The construction is expected to begin in mid2009 and finish in Q1 2012.

4.7

Commercial Opportunity

A huge commercial opportunity is available in the KLIAs new terminal for LCC, which is being designed to combine both excellent operations and attractive commercial offerings. An integrated design which will focus on delivering value to passengers in terms of shopping, catering, car parking and business services, together with advertising space will boost revenues manifold compared to the existing LCCT, which was not primarily designed for commercial use. Until 2009, the current LCCT passengers at KLIA had access to just 250 sqm of shops per million passengers, far beneath the industry design norms of up to four times this amount. By increasing the space to provide a much wider range of products, total till sales per passenger in the new terminal are expected to increase

48 three-fold between 2008 and 2014. This retail expansion commenced in the present LCCT in 2009, resulting in 43% higher revenues per passenger in June 2009 compared to June 2008.

The KLIA New Terminal design brief has a strong commercial focus, with the following requirements: 35,000 sqm total terminal commercial space 15,000 sqm retail space in single centralized airside area Retail laid out to maximise footfall and visibility Short distance/minimal processing from shops to boarding

With an optimized retail design, we will be able to drive high commercial revenues, thus minimizing the reliance on airport charges to fund the terminals development.

Malaysia Airports commercial revenues include retail revenues from Eraman activities, concession revenues from third party retailers and F&B outlets, as well as revenues derived from land development, advertising, car parking and rentals (offices, lounges, etc).

4.8

Interviews

In this exercise, the researcher has conducted personal interviews where every respondent were being asked with the same questions. Whilst the sampling method to pool respondents be explained later, the question ask will circulate on their personal views on the usage of Fast Track approach in the project as well as the strategies in implementing it.

Five (5) key respondents were interviewed in order to obtain the views and opinions pertaining to the Fast Track Approach application in the LCCT Project. The

49 said respondents are directly involved in the project and the background of them is as given below:-

Table 4.6: Background of professional respondents interviewed by researcher.

DESCRIPTION Project Manager Client Planner TOTAL NUMBERS OR RESPONDENTS 2 2 1 5

20% 40% Project Manager Client 40% Planner

Figure 4.7: Pie chart of professional respondents interviewed.

The list of questions and answers from the respondents is given in the following content analysis table 4.7 overleaf

50

Table 4.7: Content Analysis of Interview in Case Study

No. 1 2

Question What is the type of procurement system for this Fast Track project? Is there any special modification done in the procurement system to ensure significant time saving achievement? Is Fast Track Approach being used as basis of implementation schedule for LCCT project? What are the rationale adopting the Fast Track Approach in the implementation of this project? How much time saving targeted compared with traditional approach? How this contract system is aligned to achieve time compression which is critical for this project? What is the justification for adopting Fast Track Approach in the project?

Respondent 1 Traditional i.e. Selective Tender System Yes, by compressing completion period i.e. fixed crashed completion period. Yes.

Respondent 2 Traditional i.e. Selective Tender System Yes, by compressing completion period i.e. fixed crashed completion period. Yes.

Respondent 3 Traditional i.e. Selective Tender System Yes, by compressing completion period i.e. fixed crashed completion period. Yes.

Respondent 4 Traditional i.e. Selective Tender System Yes, by compressing completion period i.e. fixed crashed completion period. Yes.

Respondent 5 Traditional i.e. Selective Tender System Yes, by compressing completion period i.e. fixed crashed completion period. Yes.

To meet clients target dateline. Within four to twelve month. Proper planning and pacaging.

To expedite the delivery of project. Probably more than one year. Stringent monitoring.

To expedite the delivery of project. Less than one year grossly. System remains traditional but break-up into package. Similarities of activities, the temporary LCCT is no longer could accommodate the passengers needs and provide business activities.

To expedite the delivery of project. More than six month.

To expedite the delivery of project. Less than six month.

Time compression via Fixed Crash Completion Period. Provide business opportunities, constraint to meet business dateline and bad soil condition.

Time compression via Fixed Crash Completion Period. To meet the Masterplan schedule and constraint to meet business dateline.

To meet the Masterplan schedule and similarity of activities.

The temporary LCCT is no longer could accommodate the passengers needs and the soil condition is too bad.

51

Table 4.7: Content Analysis of Interview in Case Study (Cont,d)

No. 8

Question Did the project being divided into various different packages of work?

Respondent 1 Yes, i.e. Enabling Packages, Earthworks i.e. EW 01 & EW 02 Relocation Works and Pavement.

Respondent 2 Yes, i.e. Enabling Packages, Earthworks i.e. EW 01 & EW 02 Relocation Works and Pavement.

Respondent 3 Yes, i.e. Enabling Packages, Earthworks i.e. EW 01 & EW 02 Relocation Works and Pavement.

Respondent 4 Yes, i.e. Enabling Packages, Earthworks i.e. EW 01 & EW 02 Relocation Works and Pavement.

Respondent 5 Yes, i.e. Enabling Packages, Earthworks i.e. EW 01 & EW 02 Relocation Works and Pavement. Time compression via Fixed Crashed Completion Period, different packaging and PVD drain. Pre-fabricated vertical drain and High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compaction Method. Time saving, long term return outweighs additional project cost, Neutral on Quality

What strategies / methodologies being used for implementing the FTA in the project?

Overlapping the works activities and process, PVD drain and Dynamic Compaction Method. Pre-fabricated vertical drain and High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compaction Method.

Different packaging, PVD drain and time compression via Fixed Crashed Completion Period. Pre-fabricated vertical drain and High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compaction Method.

Dynamic Compaction Method and different packaging.

PVD drain and overlapping the works activities and process.

10

Is there any construction technology introduced to meet FTA goals?

Pre-fabricated vertical drain and High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compaction Method.

Pre-fabricated vertical drain and High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compaction Method.

11

What are the impacts resulting from Fast Track Approach (FTA)? -Time -Cost -Quality

Time saving, additional project cost, similar quality compared to Traditional method.

Time saving, long term return outweighs additional project cost, Neutral on Quality

Time saving, additional project cost, similar quality compared to Traditional method.

Time saving, long term return outweighs additional project cost, Neutral on Quality

52

4.9

Questionnaire Survey

Apart from Interview, the researcher also has carried out Questionnaires survey, the objective of which to obtain additional opinions on the implementation of Fast Track Approach in the LCCT project. This is also to reinforce and satisfy the researcher that the Fast Track Approach is really effective in achieving time compression to the project.

In this exercise, fifteen (15) respondents have responded to the list of questions prepared by the researcher. The questions were phrased and performed in getting the input as follows:-

1. Strongly Disagree 2. Disagree 3. Neutral 4. Agree 5. Strongly Agree

Below is the background of respondents as well as the opinion output gained from the Questionnaires exercise

Table 4.8: Background of professionals responded in the Questionnaires exercise.

DESCRIPTION Project Manager Client Planner Engineer Quantity Surveyor TOTAL

NUMBERS OR RESPONDENTS 4 2 1 7 1 15

53

7% 27% 46% 7% Project Manager Client 13% Planner Engineer

Figure 4.8: Pie chart of responded parties in the Questionnaires exercise.

There are 14 questions been answered by all the 15 respondents and the results are as shown in Table 4.9. All these 14 issues addressed were ranked and analyzed using Relative Index and Frequency Analysis as discussed in the following paragraph.

Table 4.9 demonstrates that 5 issues have very high ranking of importance between 0.9 to 1.0 i.e. Strongly Agree and the issues revolved in soil problem is the major hindrance (Q3), suitability of overlapping work process (Q5), usage of PVD helps expedite work process (Q6), time compression expedites delivery (Q8) and FTA benefits in term of time (Q10).

Opinions on Agree were yielded also in 5 issues and the issues are the cruciality of FTA (Q1), dynamic compactor (HIDPR) helps expedite work (Q7), breakdown into packages contributes in early delivery (Q9), MIP using FTA helps expedite work (Q13) and FTA expedites the whole work process in LCCT project (Q14).

Questions on economics contribution of FTA (Q4), quality resulting from FTA (Q11) and FTA would benefit client in terms of cost (Q12) were answered as Neutral.

54 Only one (1) issue i.e. can early completion be achieved in Traditional approach (Q2) was strongly answered as Disagree in totality by all the 15 respondents.

55

Table 4.9: Summary of Questionnaires Results

Level of Agreement Respondents Frequency Q1. Agree that the usage of FTA is crucial for LCCT project Q2. If Traditional system is used, can the early completion be achieved? Q3. Is the soil problem a major hindrance in early completion of project? Q4. Agree that the FTA would benefit the client economically Q5. Is overlapping work process & activities suitable for the project? Q6. Agree that construction technology i.e. PVD expedite the process? Q7. Agree that construction technology i.e. HIDPR expedite the process? f 0 n1 % f 0 n2 % f 1 n3 % 6.67 f 6 n4 % 40.00 f 8 n5 % 53.33 R.I A.I Rating Indication

0.89

4.47

Agree

15

100.00

0.20

1.00

Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree Neutral

15

100.00

1.00

5.00

11

73.33

26.67

0.65

3.27

46.67

53.33

0.91

4.53

Strongly Agree Strongly Agree

15

100.00

1.00

5.00

13.33

33.33

53.33

0.88

4.40

Agree

56

Table 4.9: Summary of Questionnaires Results (Contd)

Level of Agreement Respondents Frequency Q8. Is the time compression helps the delivery of project? Q9. Agree that breakdown into packages contributes to early delivery Q10. Agree that FTA would benefit in terms of time Q11. Agree that FTA would benefit in terms of quality Q12. Agree that FTA would benefit in terms of cost Q13. Is the MIP using FTA helps the early achievement of completion? Q14. Is the FTA could expedite the work process in LCCT project? f 0 n1 % f 0 n2 % f 0 n3 % f 5 n4 % 33.33 f 10 n5 % 66.67 R.I A.I Rating Indication

0.93

4.67

Strongly Agree Agree

33.33

33.33

33.33

0.80

4.00

40.00

60.00

0.92

4.60

Strongly Agree Neutral

15

100.00

0.60

3.00

46.67

13.33

40.00

0.59

2.93

Neutral

53.33

46.67

0.89

4.47

Agree

40.00

26.67

33.33

0.79

3.93

Agree

57
1.2

0.8 Relative Index

0.6 Relative Index 0.4

0.2

0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Issues

Figure 4.9: Summary of Questionnaires Results

58

CHAPTER V

DEVELOPMENT OF SCHEDULING SIMULATOR

5.1

Introduction

As part of the requirements of the research objective, researcher has to evaluate the time saving achieved through the implementation of Fast Track approach in the LCCT project. The Master Implementation Programme (MIP) as prepared by the Project Management Consultants (PMC) i.e. KLIACS was used to become the Benchmark / Base for basis of comparison. This MIP was generally prepared to incorporate all elements of fast tracking as follows:-

a) Lapping of activities where packages especially the earthworks were running concurrently and various activities were scheduled on Start to Start (SS) basis

b) Breaking of works to various packages such as earthworks i.e. Packages EW01, EW01A , EW02A and Pavement Works i.e. Airside Facilities packages AF01 & AF02.

c) Compression of construction duration (Schedule Compression) through Fixed Crashed Completion Period in the procurement system

59 d) Incorporating improved designs in closer PVD spacing in the Ground Treatment Works e) Introduction of construction technology in compaction method via High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling (HIDPR) compactor instead of conventional compactor.

The following Figure 5.1 shows the Fast Track Summary of activities lapping and breaking works into packages is performed in the Master Implementation Schedule of LCCT project i.e. based on Fast Track Approach.

60

The shortest duration of 986 days by combination of Fast Track Approach and other construction technologies i.e. High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compactor (HIDPR) and optimized Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain (PVD).

The activities lapping were done to packages EW02A and AF01 which are Earthworks and Runway pavement works respectively.

The programme shows that the lapping of activities was applied in package EW01A Construction and Package AF02 Construction i.e. Earthworks and Taxiway payment works respectively.

Figure 5.1: Task Summary of Master Implementation Schedule based on Fast Track Approach as applied in the LCCT project

61

5.2

Establishing Simulator Schedule

In the evaluation methodology, prior to establishing the simulator programmes that will be compared to the Benchmark Programme, the researcher has to establish the following data beforehand:-

a) The weightage of the activities out of the overall tasks e.g. weightage of PVD or HIDPR in the Earthworks process. These data were gained through interviews with the respective parties involved in the project as well as digesting the Work Programme of the Contractors.

b) The Constant Factor due to incorporation of fast track items e.g. closer spacing from 2400mm to 1200mm will result in 2.0 Constant Factor

The flow chart of establishment of the simulator programme is illustrated in figure 5.2 overleaf:-

62

Determine weightage of activities without Fast Track Approach i.e. using traditional approach

Establish constant for each element without Fast Track Approach

Calculation of duration of each activities involved

Data input

New duration based on Traditional approach is obtained

Comparison

Difference in no. of days Figure 5.2: Flow chart of establishment of the simulator programme.

With the above basis, the researcher has come out with schedule simulator of each element that influencing the duration of activities which has resulted in prolongation of construction period. In brief, the simulator programmes are as follows:-

a) MIP without Improved Design criteria i.e. longer PVD spacing b) MIP without enhanced Construction i.e. using normal compactor c) MIP without Schedule Compression element i.e. using normal Completion Period d) MIP without activities lapping on sequence of works.

63

5.3

Determining Weightage of Activities without Fast Track Elements

Weightage of the relevant activities involved has to be established in order to derive to the actual number of days taken in completing the activities i.e. without Fast Track Approach elements.

From the interviews and questionnaires carried out, it is found that the Fast Track Approach has been applied to Earthwork activities only and the elements are as follows:-

1. Mobilization, Site Preparation and Preliminaries 2. Excavation of unsuitable materials 3. Laying of geotextile mattress 4. Installation of PVD 5. Drainage and silt trap 6. Import earth 7. Unloading and spreading of earth 8. Compaction

Two (2) main contractors via their Senior Project Managers were approached in order to obtain input on the weightage of the Earthworks activities and they are:

1. WCT Bhd. (Main Contractor for Package EW01) 2. Gadang Bhd. BJQ JV (Main Contractor for Package EW02A)

The work programmes for both contractors were also vetted during the meetings. However, due to confidentiality reasons, the work programmes were not allowed to be disclosed in this research.

64 In establishing the ratio, below are the summary of Duration of Earthworks Activities of the projects for Earthworks EW01 and EW02A which is how under construction:-

1. Total Duration of Earthworks Activities as per Contract for Package EW01 and EW01A. (WTC Bhd.) : 688 Days

2. Total Duration of Earthworks Activities as per Contract Package EW02A (Gadang Bhd. BJQ JV) : 607 Days

The above weightage will be used as a basis to combine with the constant which is to be established below to derive to number of days taken for simulator development. The input of the said weightage is illustrated in Table 5.1 as follows:-

Table 5.1: The weightage of Earthworks elements as per Researchers findings.

Item

Activities WCT Bhd. 34

2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Mobilization, Site Preparation & Preliminaries Excavation of unsuitable materials Laying of geotextile mattress Installation of PVD Drainage and silt trap Import earth Unloading and spreading of earth Compaction Total Days of Earthwork Activities as per Contract

Days Taken % GadangBJQ JV 4.94% 30

% 4.94%

Average Weightage 5%

104 36 103 65 104 105 137 688

15.12% 5.23% 14.97% 9.45% 15.12% 15.26% 19.91% 100%

90 32 88 60 91 92 124 607

14.83% 5.27% 14.50% 9.88% 14.99% 15.16% 20.43% 100%

15% 5% 15% 10% 15% 15% 20% 100%

65

5.4

Establishing Constant of Activities without Fast Track Elements

Constant factor of the relevant activities involved has to be determined in derivation of the days taken in completing the task i.e. without Fast Track Approach elements. Generally, elements that are subjected to the said Constant factor are:-

1. Designs of closer Pre-Fabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) 2. Usage of High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling (HIDPR) compactor 3. Schedule compression via Fixed Crashed Completion Period

The tables below illustrate how the said constant factors are derived to the three (3) elements above mentioned:-

Table 5.2: Table showing how constant factor on Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain is derived.

Item 1

Description Enhance Design of Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD)

Original Spacing (without FTA) 2400mm

Enhance spacing (FTA) 1200mm

Constant factor of prolongation 2.0

Table 5.3: Table showing how constant factors on High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling is derived.

Item 1

Description Introduction of High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling (HIDPR) Compactor

Traditional compactor (Compaction per lift) 300mm

HIDPR Compactor (FTA)

Constant factor of prolongation

1200mm

4.0

66 Table 5.4: List or activities involved in earthworks and its weightage and constant abstracted from data collection

ITEM

ACTIVITIES

AVERAGE WEIGHTAGE (%)

CONSTANT WITHOUT CLOSER PVD SPACINGS IN DESIGN N/A N/A N/A 2.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A

CONSTANT WITHOUT THE USAGE OF HIGH IMPACT DYNAMIC COMPACTOR N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 4.0

A B C D E F G H

Mobilization, Site Prep & Preliminaries Excavation of unsuitable materials Laying of geotextile mattress Installation of PVD Drainage & silt trap Import earth Unloading & spreading of earth Compaction TOTAL

5% 15% 5% 15% 10% 15% 15% 20% 100%

As for the Schedule Compression, it was found that the Contractors had to work in extra working hours to meet the tight delivery time i.e. Fixed Crashed Completion Period. The additional working hours expected to be added to the normal working hours are 4 more hours in addition to the normal working hours of 8 hours and below is the tabulation of how the Constant Factor on Schedule Compression is derived.

Table 5.5: Table showing how a constant factor on Schedule Compression is derived.

Item 1

Description Schedule compression via Fixed Crashed Completion Period

Traditional system (Normal working hours) 8 hours/day

FTA (Additional working hour) 12 hours/day

Constant factor of prolongation 1.50

67

5.5

Data Input

Based on the weightage and constant factors developed in sub chapter 5.3 and 5.4 before, the data in establishing the number of days taken for scenarios which are not incorporating Fast Track Approach (FTA) is worked out as below:-

a) Scenario 1: Time Prolongation By Not Incorporating closer Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) spacing.

Table 5.6: Calculation of time prolongation by not incorporating closer spacing of pre-fabricated vertical drain (PVD) for simulation of work programme purpose

Fast Track Work Program Incorporating close spacing No. Task Name prefab Vertical Drain (In Days) (Benchmark) A 1 2. 2.1 a b c d e PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron

Constant

Work Program without incorFactor x porating Weightage Closer 2.0 x 0.15 Spacing Prefab. = 0.30 Vertical Drain (In Days) (Simulation) C=A+B B

58 58 58 194 210

17.40 17.40 17.40 58.20 63.00

75.40 75.40 75.40 252.20 273.00

The above table shows an example of how number of days for work Programme without incorporating closer Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain Spacing i.e. by multiplying constant factor and weightage as shown in Table 5.4 and adding it with the duration of Fast Track Approach (FTA) Work Programme.

68

After the numbers of days is established, the data will be inserted to substitute the number of days in the Fast Track Approach work programme and the example is as shown overleaf:-

69

Update/input new data on revised days from 58 to 75 days.

Update/input new data on revised days from 194 to 252 days.

Update/input new data on revised days from 58 to 75 days. Update/input new data on revised days from 58 to 75 days. Duration of these columns will be accordingly updated further to updated data input from the activities below

Update/input new data on revised days from 210 to 273 days.

Figure 5.3: Example of data input/update based on new duration due to longer Prefabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) spacings.

70 The above example shows that the duration of activities are updated based on the input derived from Table 5.6 (partly). Accordingly, the durations of Earthworks, EW01 Construction and EW01 Earthwork will also be updated automatically with the Microsoft Project software.

b) Scenario 2: Time Prolongation by Not Incorporating High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling compactor.

Table 5.7: Calculation of time prolongation by not incorporating High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling compactor for simulation of work programme purposes
Fast Track Work Program Incorporating Dyn. Impact Compactor (In Days) (Benchmark) A Constant Factor x Weightage 4.0 x 0.20 = 0.80 B Work Program without incorporating Dyn. Impact Compactor (In Days) (Simulation) C=A+B

No.

Task Name

1 2. 2.1 a b c d e

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron

58 58 58 194 210

46.40 46.40 46.40 155.20 168.00

104.40 104.40 104.40 349.20 378.00

The above table shows an example of how number of days for work Programme without incorporating closer High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling compactor i.e. by multiplying constant factor and weightage as shown in Table 5.4 and adding it with the duration of Fast Track Approach (FTA) Work Programme.

71 After the numbers of days is established, the data will be inserted to substitute the number of days in the Fast Track Approach work programme and the example is as shown below:-

Update/input new data on revised days from 58 to 104 days. Update/input new data on revised days from 58 to 104 days.

Update/input new data on revised days from 194 to 349 days. Update/input new data on revised days from 210 to 278 days.

Update/input new data on revised days from 58 to 104 days.

Duration of these columns will be accordingly updated further to updated data input from the activities below Figure 5.4: Example of data input/update based on new duration due to usage of normal compactor in compaction method

72

c) Scenario 3: Time Prolongation by Not Incorporating Schedule Compression Element i.e. Fixed Crashed Completion Period.

Table 5.8: Example of calculation of time prolongation by not incorporating Schedule Compression Approach for Simulation of work programme purposes
Fast Track Work Program Incorporating Sched. Constant Compression Factor (In Days) (1.50) (Benchmark)

No.

Task Name

Work Program without incorporating Sched. Compression (In Days) (Simulation)

1 a 2. 2.1 a b c d e f

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG Site Clearing & Access for Site EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork Mobilization and Site Preparation ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron

59

1.50

88.50

22 58 58 58 194 210

1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50

33.00 87.00 87.00 87.00 291.00 315.00

The above table shows an example of how number of days for work Programme without incorporating Schedule Compression Approach i.e. by multiplying constant factor and weightage as shown in Table 5.4 and adding it with the duration of Fast Track Approach (FTA) Work Programme.

After the numbers of days is established, the data will be inserted to substitute the number of days in the Fast Track Approach work programme and the example is as shown overleaf:-

73

Update/input new data on revised days from 58 to 87 days. Update/input new data on revised days from 58 to 87 days.

Update/input new data on revised days from 194 to 291 days. Update/input new data on revised days from 210 to 315 days.

Update/input new data on revised days from 58 to 87 days.

Duration of these columns will be accordingly updated further to updated data input from the activities below

Update/input new data on revised days from 59 to 89 days.

Figure 5.5: Example of data input/update based on new duration by Traditional Open Completion Period i.e. not using Schedule Compression element

74 d) Scenario 4: Time Prolongation without overlapping of activities on sequence of works

In this scenario, the main activity that was found as contributory is the Pavement Works. In the Fast Track schedule, the commencement of Pavement Works is scheduled when part of the Preloading of Package EW01A and EW02A (Area 1) is completed.

In the Traditional Approach, the Pavement Works shall start after all Preloading exercises in Packages EW01 and EW02A are fully completed i.e. on Finish to Start (FS) basis. This has resulted in a longer duration of overall completion and it is best illustrated in the Figure 5.6 below:-

The commencement (start) of construction works for Package AF01 i.e. Runway Pavement after the completion (Finish) of surcharge for Package EW02A i.e. Earthworks.

Figure 5.6: Example of scheduling on Finish to Start basis on the activity of Pavement Works

75

CHAPTER VI

RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

6.1

Introduction

This chapter focuses on analyzing the results based on the data gathered pertaining to the case study i.e. New LCCT project. The data collected include all articles, statistics, engineering reports, Master Implementation Programme and any other documents in relation to this study. Besides, the results from the Content Analysis and Questionnaires survey will be elaborately touch to supplement the findings.

Generally, these data will be discussed under several topics which are in pursuance to answering the objectives of the studies as earlier discussed in Chapter 1 of this dissertation. In addition, the comparisons of scheduling between the Benchmark Schedule and Simulator Schedules will be further discussed in detail.

6.2

Findings from the Interviews

Below are the summaries of findings for the Content Analysis carried out to five selected respondents who are directly involved in the LCCT project:-

76

1. All five respondents had agreed that the Type of Procurement is using the Traditional Procurement System with Selective Tender mode. In this practice, only qualified tenderers who had passed the Pre-qualification exercise were invited to participate in the tender.

2. Answers to question number two indicated that 100% of the respondents agreed that there was modification made to the Procurement exercise i.e. by imposing Fixed Crashed Completion Period which is technically known as Time or Schedule Compression Method. This is to stimulate the delivery of the project to meet the target. 3. Answers to question number three has re-affirmed the fact that Fast Track Approach has been adopted as the approach used in the implementation schedule of the LCCT Project.

4. Question number four also solidly responded by agreeing that the rationale of adopting Fast Track Approach is to expedite the delivery of the project as well as to meet the Clients target dateline.

5. Question number five had been responded in mixed opinions on the duration of time saving targeted and it ranges between four (4) months and more than a years time. It is therefore crucial for the researcher to derive the actual duration of time saving by virtue of adopting the Fast Track Approach as compared to the Traditional Approach and this issue will be deliberately elaborated the next chapter of this research.

6. Some mixed opinions were also found in Question number six where the respondents had given their views on how the Contract System was aligned to achieve the time compression. Two (2) respondents viewed that Fixed

77 Crashed Completion is the key system while others responded that it is by means of proper planning & packaging as well as stringent monitoring.

7. Response for Question number seven illustrates various views of all respondents on the justification of adopting Fast Track Approach for the project and in general, it revolves on the issues of meeting Masterplan schedule, under capacity of the current LCCT, similarities of nature of the activities, offering more business opportunities as well as due to the very bad soil conditions.

8. For question number eight, all respondents had given the information that the project had been divided into various different packages i.e. Enabling Works, Earthworks, Relocation Works and Pavement Works.

9. Question number nine saw various strategies being viewed by the respondents in implementing Fast Track Approach for the project and these include overlapping of works activities, closer Pre-fabricated vertical drain spacing, construction technology via High Impact Dynamic compactor, packaging the project into smaller contracts and Time Compression via Fixed Crashed Completion Period.

10. Response on question ten indicated that 100% of the respondents agreed that construction technology and enhance design had been introduced in meeting the Fast Track goal and these had been done through the introduction of High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling compactor and closer Pre-fabricated vertical drain spacing respectively.

11. The final question on the impacts of Fast Track Approach in terms of Time, Cost and Quality had shown consensus of time saving aspect with 100% respondents agreed. 80% of the respondents agreed that the Long Term

78 Revenue will outweighs the Initial Cost incurred whilst 100% were of the opinion of Neutral on Quality achieved via Fast Track Approach as compared to Traditional Approach.

6.3

Findings from Questionnaires

Below are the summaries of results from the questionnaires responded by fifteen (15) respondents who are directly involved in the project:1. Answers to question number one i.e. on whether the Fast Track Approach is crucial for the LCCT project indicated that 53% of the respondents strongly agreed, 40% agreed whilst 7% answered neutral.

7%

Strongly Disagree Disagree 40% Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

53%

Figure 6.1: Cruciality of Fast Track Approach for LCCT Project

2. 100% respondents strongly disagreed to the opinion of early completion of project should the Traditional System being used in the project and this has been illustrated in Figure 6.2

79

Strongly Disagree Disagree 100% Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.2: Views on whether early completion could be met in Traditional Approach

3. In contrary to the respond in item 2, 100% strongly agreed that soil problem is the major hindrance of early completion of the project.

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral 100% Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.3: Opinion on soil problem of which the major hindrance in the early completion of LCCT project.

4. On the economic benefit of Fast Track Approach, 73% of the respondents are of the neutral stand whilst 27% agreed.

80

27%

Strongly Disagree Disagree 73% Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.4: Opinion on the benefit of Fast Track Approach economically

5. Question number five sought the opinion on suitability of overlapping work process for the project and the results shown that 53% strongly agreed while 47% agreed.

Strongly Disagree 53% 47% Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.5: Opinion on suitability of overlapping work process for the LCCT project.

6. 100% solid response was received in question number six i.e. on whether the usage of Pre-fabricated vertical drain would help expedite the construction works where all the respondents agreed to this statement.

81

Strongly Disagree Disagree 100% Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.6: Opinion on the usage of PVD would help expedite the construction works in LCCT project.

7. Results for question number seven shown that 53% respondents strongly agreed that the usage of High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling compactor would expedite the work, 34% agreed whilst 13% neutral.

13%

Strongly Disagree Disagree 34% Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

53%

Figure 6.7: Opinion on the usage of Dynamic Compactor machine would expedite the construction work.

82 8. 67% strongly agreed whilst 33% agreed on the effects of time compression element via Fixed Crashed Completion Period towards the early delivery of LCCT project and this was shown on Figure 6.8.

33% 67%

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.8: Views on Effect of Time Compression approach to the delivery of LCCT project 9. On the idea of breaking down the work into different packages, 33% strongly agreed that it would contribute to the early delivery of the project, 33% agreed while 34% neutral.

33%

34%

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral

33%

Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.9: Views on whether breaking down the work packages would contribute to the early delivery of LCCT Project.

83 10. For question number ten i.e. the benefit of Fast Track Approach in terms of Time, response from the respondents were 60% strongly agreed and 40% agreed.

40% 60%

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.10: Opinion on Fast Track Approach benefit in terms of Time.

11. Quality of work will not be affected by the usage of Fast Track Approach and results of 100% neutral to this question number 11 was a testimony of this opinion.

Strongly Disagree Disagree 100% Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.11: Opinion on Fast Track Approach benefit in terms of Quality

84 12. Figure 6.12 represents the opinion on Fast Track Approach benefit in terms of Cost and the results shown are 40% agreed, 13% neutral and 47% disagreed that the approach would give cost benefit to the Client.

40% 47%

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral 13% Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.12: Opinion on Fast Track Approach benefit in terms of Cost

13. The influence of scheduling in Fast Track Approach is essential towards the early completion of the project and this was reflected in the respondents answers of 47% strongly agreed and 53% agreed and this has been illustrated in Figure 6.13

Strongly Disagree 47% 53% Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.13: Views on influence of Fast Track Approach in scheduling; would it help to early completion of LCCT project.

85 14. Final question which could be considered as the conclusive opinion out of all questions has been rated positively where 33% agreed that Fast Track Approach could expedite the overall work process in the LCCT project. The remaining opinions are 27% agreed and 40% stood neutral. This is a good indication that the Fast Track Approach was positively acknowledged as the system that could expedite the overall work process.

33% 40%

Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral

27%

Agree Strongly Agree

Figure 6.14: Opinion on whether Fast Track Approach could expedite the overall work process in LCCT project.

6.4 Study

The Justification for Compressing Project Schedule Based on the Case

Below are the findings on justification of compressing the Project Schedule for the case study and these facts would answer the first objective of this dissertation as outlined in Chapter 1 of this study:

86 a) Passengers Capacity

The current capacity of KLIA LCCT is insufficient to match Air Asia's exponential growth. The figures below show that there will be an estimated shortfall passengers capacity of 11, 983,000 by 2014.

Table 6.1:- Data on Passengers capacity in LCCT for Air Asia group of companies Source: - MAHB Finance Department
Passengers Air Asia Air Asia X Total LCCT Capacity Shortfall 2,630,000 -732,000 -4,416,000 -7,961,000 -10,177,000 -11,983,000 Y 2009 10,170,100 2,200,000 12,370,000 15,000,000 Y 2010 11,432,000 4,300,000 15,732,000 15,000,000 Y 2011 12,516,000 6,900,000 19,416,000 15,000,000 Y 2012 13,816,000 9,100,000 22,961,000 15,000,000 Y 2013 15,177,000 10,000,000 25,177,000 15,000,000 Y 2014 16,083,000 10,900,000 26,983,000 15,000,000

The latest expansion in LCCT (current LCCT) will increase the capacity of the airport by 15 million but based on the projections, however, the airport will be overflowing again within the time span of one (1) year.

This is due to the fact that Air Asia has a Compounded Annual Growth Rate of 57% and this year alone, its passengers have exceeded 15 million per annum. The high growth rates for Air Asia and Air Asia X is expected to continue well into the next decade.

To reinforce the above findings, the rate of growth in the past 10 years i.e. from Year 2000 to Year 2009 of KLIA as a whole also had shown a good improvement where the rate has grown from 32.4 million to 51.3 million in 10 years period. Figure 6.4.1 illustrates the above fact for reference.

87

Figure 6.15: Passengers movement at MAHB Airports from 2000 - 2009 Source: MAHB Annual Report 2009

From the studies made by MAHB based on the current trend, it is also forecasted that the increasing growth will continue in the next future years i.e. up to Year 2014. Figure 6.16 below illustrates the forecast

Figure 6.16: Base passengers forecast at MAHB Airports in future years Source: MAHB Annual Report 2009

88 Premised on these statistics, the expansion of KLIA as a whole and LCCT in particular is justifiable and failure in meeting the demand may tarnish the image of the Government in its pursuit of acknowledging KLIA as an aeronautical hub in this region.

b) Bad Soil Condition Generally, the sub-soil consists of very soft clay or very soft sandy clay with decayed wood with SPT-N value varying from 0 blows - 3 blows per 300mm penetration. The thickness of this soil layer varies from 10.5m to 27m. Very hard sandy silt, sandy clay or sand with SPT-N values more than 50blows per 300mm can be expected from 22.5m to 31.5m. However at borehole B1, very stiff sub-soil (N > 30 blows) at 36.36m below ground level. Generally, the thickness of soft sediments increases towards the north of the proposed Runway 3. The recorded ground water level varies from 0.46m 1.60m below ground level.

To be practical and assuming a target settlement of 90% _T the estimated consolidation time would need to be accelerated. Adopting the use of preloading would be justified to minimize the cost, practical and would make the post construction settlement manageable. It is also proposed that pre-fabricated vertical drains (PVD) are introduced in conjunction with the preloading at these locations to accelerate the consolidation time.

89 c) Creating Other Commercial Opportunity

A huge commercial opportunity is available in the KLIAs new terminal for LCC, which is being designed to combine both excellent operations and attractive commercial offerings. An integrated design which will focus on delivering value to passengers in terms of shopping, catering, car parking and business services, together with advertising space will boost revenues manifold compared to the existing LCCT, which was not primarily designed for commercial use. Until 2009, LCCT passengers at KLIA had access to just 250 sqm of shops per million passengers, far beneath the industry design norms of up to four times this amount. By increasing the space to provide a much wider range of products, total till sales per passenger in the new terminal are expected to increase three-fold between 2008 and 2014. This retail expansion commenced in the present LCCT in 2009, resulting in 43% higher revenues per passenger in June 2009 compared to June 2008. The New LCCT Terminal design brief has a strong commercial focus, with the following requirements: 35,000 sqm total terminal commercial space 15,000 sqm retail space in single centralised airside area Retail laid out to maximise footfall and visibility Short distance/minimal processing from shops to boarding

Commercial development will be one of the key drivers of profitability for Malaysia Airports over the next five years. Strategies are in place to revolutionize the retail experience and drive new income streams to more than double revenues by 2014. Growth through commercial activities is essential for delivering strong returns to shareholders whilst enabling aviation charges to remain competitive, in turn driving further airport growth. Two (2) figures overleaf illustrate the forecasted revenue from commercial activities from

90 Year 2008 to 2014 in KLIA in consideration of New LCCT being operational in first quarter of 2012.

Figure 6.17: Projected commercial revenue growth (RM million) Source : MAHB Annual Report 2009

Figure 6.18: Details of commercial revenue (RM 000) Source : MAHB Annual Report 2009

91 6.5 Strategies in Implementing Fast Track Approach

The second objective of the studies requires the researcher to determine the strategies that being implemented by the Client in order to achieve the early delivery of the New LCCT project in line with the increasing needs and from the researchers findings, below is the findings in meeting the said objective:

a) Developing a process for overlapping dependent. By providing a formalized process for overlapping traditionally sequential activities, this work is the first step in eventually automating the process.

The proposed methodology incorporates existing information technology tools, where available, including network scheduling programs.

b) Design is also an essence in expediting the work process. In dealing with the site conditions, some of the obstacles have to be seriously identified, recognized and contemplated so as to establish the right solutions in facing the on-site challenges. One of the main problems foreseen in the case study is the soil condition where the Runway 3 is going to be built where most of the site area is sitting on peat soil and treatment is therefore inevitable. The study will review the methodology being used in fronting the issue as well as steps that being taken so as to optimize the design and giving fair value for money to the Client.

With the above predicament, the Design Engineers were of the opinion that solutions had to be sought in order to accelerate the ground consolidation, the purpose of which to ensure the delivery of the project. Further to this, the Design Engineers have come out with improvement of the PVD designs where the spacing of PVD was increased from 2.40m to 1.20m square

92 spacing. This has resulted in tremendous acceleration of hydraulic extraction from the peat soil before settlement and consolidation took place.

c) Construction technology is one of the elements took place in expediting the earthwork process. In this means, compaction of earth is one of the activities which constitute longest duration in the earthworks overall process. Using the normal conventional roller, the layer of compaction per lift is limited to 300 mm per layer and in order to complete the filled earth into consolidation, the process of compaction has to be carried out 12 times, taking into consideration of the total filled thickness of 3.60 m.

With the invented construction technology, the project team has decided that this critical activity need to be expedited and search for alternative compactor is inevitable. Finally, the solution has been found with reasonable cost implication and the compacter as termed as High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling compactor was introduced instead of the normal compactor. With this machine, the compaction per layer of lift could be done in 1.20 m and tremendous time saving has finally be achieved.

d) Compressing Construction Time

The other way of achieving the delivery of the LCCT project is by compressing Construction duration of each activity. From the researchers analysis, the construction duration has been designed to accommodate additional working hours to realize the early project completion.

Instead of normal 8 hours of working, the additional 4 hours of overtime have been allowed and therefore, the total working hours has now increased. This has been incorporated in the Procurement System whereby a

93 Fixed Crashed Completion Period was introduced in all work packages. The time saving expected through this approach is 50% grossly.

6.6

Evaluation of Time Saving

Evaluation of Time Saving is the final objective of this study. In achieving this, it is the duty of the researcher to compare the time saving achieved between the Benchmark i.e. Fast Track schedule and the simulator schedules.

The simulator schedules are prepared based on the methodology described in Chapter 5 of this study and it is compared with the Master Implementation Programme of the New LCCT project which was found using the Fast Track elements. The process is generally outlined as follows:-

1. Tabulation of calculation of duration without Fast Track elements of:-

a) Enhanced design of closer PVD spacing (Scenario 1) b) Schedule compression of additional working time (Scenario 2) c) Construction technology of HIDPR compactor (Scenario 3) d) Overlapping of task activity based on sequence of works (Scenario 4)

2. Keying the data input gained from the above calculation in substitution to the Original Schedule (MIP) and the simulator schedules are therefore established

3. Comparison of period difference between the Benchmark and the simulator schedules 4. Establishing the ranking in ascending order.

94

The findings from the comparisons made with all the above considerations are shown in the following tables and figures:-

6.6.1

Scenario 1: Schedule simulator without Enhance design of closer PVD spacing

The calculation, simulation schedule and comparison are given as follows:-

Table 6.2: Calculation of Period Prolongation between the MIP of LCCT (Benchmark) and Simulator Schedule without element of closer PVD

No.

Task Name

Fast Track Work Program Incorporating Closer Spacing Prefab. Vertical Drain (In Days) (Benchmark) A

Constant Factor x Weghtage 2.0 x 0.15 = 0.30 B

Work Program without incorporating Closer Spacing Prefab. Vertical Drain (In Days) (Simulation) C=A+B

1 2. 2.1 a b c d e

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) 58 58 58 194 210 17.40 17.40 17.40 58.20 63.00 75.40 75.40 75.40 252.20 273.00

95 Table 6.2: Calculation of Period Prolongation Between the MIP of LCCT (Benchmark) and Simulator Schedule without element of Closer PVD (Contd)
Work Program without incorporating Closer Spacing Prefab. Vertical Drain (In Days) (Simulation) B 108 119 105 78 89 253 360 91 89 210 137 61 59 75 59 75 158 97 127 96 345 105 105 32.40 35.70 31.50 23.40 26.70 75.90 108.00 27.30 26.70 63.00 41.10 18.30 17.70 22.50 17.70 22.50 47.40 29.10 38.10 28.80 103.50 31.50 31.50 C=A+B 140.40 154.70 136.50 101.40 115.70 328.90 468.00 118.30 115.70 273.00 178.10 79.30 76.70 97.50 76.70 97.50 205.40 126.10 165.10 124.80 448.50 136.50 136.50

No.

Task Name

Fast Track Work Program Incorporating Closer Spacing Prefab. Vertical Drain (In Days) (Benchmark) A

Constant Factor x Weghtage 2.0 x 0.15 = 0.30

f g h j k l m n p q r s 2.2 a b c d 2.3 a b c d 3.1 a 3.2 a 3.3 a

ZONE F2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross taxiway ( Left Wing) ZONE E ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) ZONE E1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) ZONE E2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Taxiway (Right Wing) ZONE J ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Left Wing) ZONE K ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) ZONE K1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) ZONE D ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - Int. Complex ZONE I ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - Approach Road ZONE I1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Parking Apron ZONE I2 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area ZONE E3A ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) UT 03A Construction & Remaining Earthworks ZONE E3B ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) ZONE E3 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) ZONE L1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) ZONE L ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) EW 01A Earthworks Zone A (Hotel) Construction Zone A1 (ACTL-West Tower) Construction Zone B (Car Park) Construction Zone C (District Cooling Plant & Sub-station) Construction EW 02A Construction (Area 1) Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 EW 02A Construction (Area 2) Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 EW 02A Construction (Area 3) Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3

96 With the above calculations, the data input was inserted into the Original MIP and the simulator schedule for this Scenario 1 is established. The schedule is illustrated in Figure 6.19 below together with review and comparison

The Total nos. of days estimated to be affected in Earthwork process without using optimized / shorter Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) spacing in order of the packages contained in the LCCT project.

affected shown

earthworks in the from

prolongation Summary longer bar

resulted

Pre-fabricated

Vertical

Drain (PVD) spacing. A total difference or period prolongations of 23 days were estimated by this process.

Figure 6.19: Summary of Scheduling Simulator for Work Programme without Incorporating Enhance Design i.e. Closer PVD Spacing and comparison

97

1060 1040 1020 1000 980 960 940 920

MIP Incorporating all FTA elements

Simulator Work Programme (without closer PVD spacing)

MIP Incorporating all FTA elements Simulator Work Programme (without closer PVD spacing) Figure 6.20: Comparison of FTA schedule with Simulator schedule (without closer PVD spacing)

6.6.2

Scenario 2: Schedule simulator without Schedule compression of additional working time

The calculation, simulation schedule and comparison are given as follows:-

98

Table 6.3: Calculation of Period Prolongation between the MIP of LCCT (Benchmark) and Simulator Schedule without element of Schedule Compression
Fast Track Work Program IncorNo. Task Name porating Sched. Compression (In Days) (Benchmark) 1 a 2. 2.1 a b c d e f g h j k l m n p q r s t 2.2 a b c d e f g h j PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG Site Clearing & Access for Site EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork Mobilization and Site Preparation ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) ZONE F2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross taxiway ( Left Wing) ZONE E ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) ZONE E1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) ZONE E2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Taxiway (Right Wing) ZONE J ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Left Wing) ZONE K ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) ZONE K1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) ZONE D ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - Int. Complex ZONE I ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - Approach Road ZONE I1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Parking Apron ZONE I2 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area ZONE E3A ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) UT 03A Construction & Remaining Earthworks Relocation of Security Service Road & Fence New Pump Station & Associated Works Relocation of Services + Lay New Pipe New Pump Station A Substation & Associated Works ICT Relocation Works ZONE E3B ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) ZONE E3 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) ZONE L1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) ZONE L ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) 171 223 193 208 105 59 75 59 75 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 256.50 334.50 289.50 312.00 157.50 88.50 112.50 88.50 112.50 22 58 58 58 194 210 108 119 105 78 89 253 360 91 89 210 137 61 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 33.00 87.00 87.00 87.00 291.00 315.00 162.00 178.50 157.50 117.00 133.50 379.50 540.00 136.50 133.50 315.00 205.50 91.50 59 1.50 88.50 Constant Factor (1.50) Work Program without incorporating Sched. Compression (In Days) (Simulation)

99 Table 6.3: Calculation of Period Prolongation Between the MIP of LCCT (Benchmark) and Simulator Schedule without Element of Schedule Compression (Contd)
Fast Track Work Program IncorNo. Task Name porating Sched. Compression (In Days) (Benchmark) j 2.3 a b c d e 3.1 a b 3.2 a b 3.3 a b 4 4.1 a b c 4.2 a b c d e 4.3 a b ZONE L ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) EW 01A Construction Mobilization, Site Preparation & Soil Investigation Zone A (Hotel) Construction Zone A1 (ACTL-West Tower) Construction Zone B (Car Park) Construction Zone C (District Cooling Plant & Sub-station) Construction EW 02A Construction (Area 1) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 EW 02A Construction (Area 2) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 EW 02A Construction (Area 3) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Construction Mobilization Firtst 1.3 km Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway Remaining area of Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway AF 02 Construction Mobilization Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE K Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE E2 Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE I2 Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE F2 At Relocation area Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3B & L1 Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3 & L 7 105 7 105 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 10.50 157.50 10.50 157.50 19 345 1.50 1.50 28.50 517.50 14 158 97 127 96 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 21.00 237.00 145.50 190.50 144.00 75 1.50 Constant Factor (1.50) Work Program without incorporating Sched. Compression (In Days) (Simulation) 112.50

30 120 118 30 31 45 120 46 122 91

1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50

45.00 180.00 177.00 45.00 46.50 67.50 180.00 69.00 183.00 136.50

With the above calculations, the data input was inserted into the Original MIP and the simulator schedule for this Scenario 2 is established. The schedule is illustrated in Figure 6.21 below together with review and comparison

100

Longer summary bar illustrates longer completion Total nos. of days estimated to be effected without using schedule compression element in order of the packages contained in the LCCT project. period should element on schedule compression via Fixed Crashed completion period is not part of the scheduling process. This has resulted in total nos. of 1181 days overall which is 195 days longer than programme using Time Compression i.e. Fast Track Approach (FTA) Schedule.

Figure 6.21: Task Summary of Scheduling simulator without Incorporating Schedule Compression Element

101

1220 1200 1180 1160 1140 1120 1100 1080 1060 1040 1020 1000 980 960 940 920

MIP Incorporating all FTA elements

Simulator Work Programme without Schedule Compression

MIP Incorporating all FTA elements Simulator Work Programme without Schedule Compression Figure 6.22: Comparison of FTA schedule with Simulator schedule (without Schedule Compression element)

6.6.3

Scenario 3: Schedule simulator without Construction technology of HIDPR compactor

The calculation, simulation schedule and comparison are given as follows:-

102

Table 6.4: Calculation of Period Prolongation between the MIP of LCCT (Benchmark) and Simulator Schedule without element of construction technology i.e. HIDPR compactor

Fast Track Work Program Incorporating Dyn. ImNo. Task Name pact Compactor (In Days) (Benchmark) A 1 2. 2.1 a b c d e f g h j k l m n p q r s 2.2 a b PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) ZONE F2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross taxiway ( Left Wing) ZONE E ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) ZONE E1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) ZONE E2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Taxiway (Right Wing) ZONE J ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Left Wing) ZONE K ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) ZONE K1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) ZONE D ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - Int. Complex ZONE I ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - Approach Road ZONE I1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Parking Apron ZONE I2 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area ZONE E3A ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) UT 03A Construction & Remaining Earthworks ZONE E3B ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) ZONE E3 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) 59 75 58 58 58 194 210 108 119 105 78 89 253 360 91 89 210 137 61

Constant Factor x Weightage

Work Program without incorporating Dyn. Impact Compactor (In Days) (Simulation) C=A+B

4.0 x 0.20 = 0.80 B

46.40 46.40 46.40 155.20 168.00 86.40 95.20 84.00 62.40 71.20 202.40 288.00 72.80 71.20 168.00 109.60 48.80

104.40 104.40 104.40 349.20 378.00 194.40 214.20 189.00 140.40 160.20 455.40 648.00 163.80 160.20 378.00 246.60 109.80

47.20 60.00

106.20 135.00

103 Table 6.4: Calculation of Period Prolongation between the MIP of LCCT (Benchmark) and Simulator Schedule without element of construction technology i.e. HIDPR compactor (Contd)
Fast Track Work Program Incorporating Dyn. ImNo. Task Name pact Compactor (In Days) (Benchmark) A c d 2.3 a b c d 3.1 a 3.2 a 3.3 a ZONE L1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) ZONE L ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) EW 01A Earthworks Zone A (Hotel) Construction Zone A1 (ACTL-West Tower) Construction Zone B (Car Park) Construction Zone C (District Cooling Plant & Sub-station) Construction EW 02A Construction (Area 1) Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 EW 02A Construction (Area 2) Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 EW 02A Construction (Area 3) Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 345 276.00 621.00 158 97 127 96 126.40 77.60 101.60 76.80 284.40 174.60 228.60 172.80 59 75 47.20 60.00 4.0 x 0.20 = 0.80 B Constant Factor x Weightage Work Program without incorporating Dyn. Impact Compactor (In Days) (Simulation) C=A+B 106.20 135.00

105

84.00

189.00

105

84.00

189.00

With the above calculations, the data input was inserted into the Original MIP and the simulator schedule for this Scenario 3 is established. The schedule is illustrated in Figure 6.23 below together with review and comparison

104

Total nos. of days estimated to be affected in Earthwork process without using High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling Compactor (HIDPR) in order of the packages contained in the LCCT

The

affected

earthworks

period

prolongation shown in the Summary bar resulted from normal roller compactor in lieu of High Impact Proof Rolling Compactor (HIDPR). A total difference or period prolongation of 158 days was estimated by this process.

Figure 6.23: Summary of Scheduling simulator without Incorporating Dynamic Compactor (HIDPR Compactor)

105

1220 1200 1180 1160 1140 1120 1100 1080 1060 1040 1020 1000 980 960 940 920

MIP Incorporating all FTA elements

Simulator schedule without Dynamic Compaction element

MIP Incorporating all FTA elements Simulator schedule without Dynamic Compaction element Figure 6.24: Comparison of FTA schedule with Simulator schedule (without Construction Technology i.e. HIDPR Compactor)

6.6.4

Scenario 4: Schedule simulator without Overlapping of task activity based on sequence of works

For this item, the overlapping of activities on sequence of works is done to the schedule by shifting the supposedly applied Finish to Start (FS) method and this simulator is done by shifting the respective task after the completion of the predecessor activities. Specifically, the said activity is the Pavement Works which would only take place after the pre-loading of the Earthworks is fully completed and the simulator schedule established is illustrated in Figure 6.25 below together with review and comparison.

106

The commencement (start) of construction works for Package AF01 i.e. Runway Pavement after the completion (Finish) of surcharge for Package EW02A i.e. Earthworks has resulted in 127 days of prolongation to the overall days as compared to the Fast Track Schedule. This constitutes 12.88% longer in completion to the overall project in comparison with Fast Track Schedule.

Figure 6.25: Summary of Scheduling simulator without overlapping of activities and program was based on Finish to Start (FS) basis

107

1060 1040 1020 1000 980 960 940 920

MIP Incorporating all FTA elements

Simulator schedule without overlapping of activities element

MIP Incorporating all FTA elements Simulator schedule without overlapping of activities element Figure 6.26: Comparison of FTA schedule with Simulator schedule (without overlapping of activities element)

Based on the above comparisons on the four (4) elements discussed, the Summary of difference in duration is given in the following Table 6.5 where the ranking is also given in ascending order:

108

Table 6.5: Summary of Completion Period Difference in Simulator Schedules as Against Fast Track Approach Schedules as Adopted in LCCT Project.

ITEM 1

WORK PROGRAMME (IN MICROSOFT PROJECT) Master Work Programme Incorporating Element of : a) Activities lapping (Fast Track Approach) b) Design Improvement in Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain(PVD) spacing. c) Construction technology in High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling compactor machine. d) Schedule Compression via Fixed Crashed Completion Period. Master Work Programme as item 1 but without incorporating: a) Design Improvement in Pre-fabricated Vertical Drain (PVD) Master Work Programme as item 1 but without incorporating: a) Activities lapping Master Work Programme as item 1 but without incorporating: a) Schedule Compression via Fixed Crashed Completion Period. Master Work Programme as item 1 but without incorporating: a) Construction technology in High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling compactor machine.

TOTAL DAYS TAKEN 986

DIFFERENCE BASE / BENCHMARK

PERCENTAGE BASE / BENCHMARK

RANKING BASE / BENCHMARK

1009

23

2.33%

1113 127 1181 195

12.88%

19.78%

1204

218

22.11%

109

1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0

1286 Days 1181 Days 986 Days 1009 Days 1204 Days

Master Work Programme Incorporating all FTA elements Simulator Programme without closer PVD spacing Simulator Programme without Schedule Compression element Simulator Programme without HIDPR Compactor element Simulator Programme without overlapping of activities Figure 6.27: Overall Completion Period comparison between FTA schedule with Simulator schedules

110

6.6.5

Summary

From the above evaluation carried out on the Benchmark Programme against the Simulator programmes, the time saving achieved could be summarized as follows:

a) The longest duration of time saving is contributed by the adoption of Construction Technology via High Impact Dynamic Proof Rolling compactor. The total time saving is 218 days equals to 22.11% of total number of days taken.

b) The second longest contributory factor is attributed by Schedule Compression where the number of days reduction was calculated at 195 days which is 19.78% of the total duration. c) The third rank in term of time saving is contributed by overlapping of activities with 127 days saving. This duration is 12.88% shorter as compared to Traditional Approach schedule. d) The design improvement via closer PVD spacing has registered to a saving of 23 days duration and this is 2.33% of the total duration and this approach fall in the fourth rank.

111

CHAPTER VII

CONCLUSION

Premised on the foregoing results and analysis carried out from the data gained in the Case Study, what could be concluded is Fast Track Approach is really effective in time saving for the LCCT Runway project.

The purpose of this chapter is to transform the data analyzed in Chapter 6 into summaries that would be useful to conclude the research findings. The findings are summarized based on the objectives as laid down in Chapter 1 earlier.

7.1

Objective 1: The Needs and Rationale for Fast Track Approach in LCCT Runway project

The findings of the studies had proved that the needs for Fast Track Approach are justifiable by the following rationales:-

a) Under Capacity of Current LCCT With the increasing demand and overall trend of aeronautical needs, the current LCCT would no longer capable of handling the passengers flow

112 and failure in meeting the need may jeopardize the reputation of aeronautical industry of the country as well as losing opportunity in profit making.

b) Bad Soil Condition

Further to the Site Investigation, it was found that the soil type was so bad and most of the runway area was full of peat soil and soil treatment is therefore inevitable.

After serious deliberation, most of the experts had agreed that the soil treatment process has to be carried and in order to achieve the delivery time, enhance design was adopted in closer PVD spacing so as to accelerate the treatment process.

c) Creating Other Commercial Opportunity

It has been proven that the commercial industry is supplemental in the overall revenue of the KLIA and LCCT. With the current trend from the data of the past ten (10) years, it is forecasted that the revenue from these support industries would contribute to more than RM 2 billion in year 2014 and therefore the initial cost of constructing the New LCCT which was estimated at RM 2 billion could be easily redeemed.

7.2

Objective 2: The Strategies of using Fast Track Approach in LCCT Runway Project

From the analysis carried out, the following elements were found to be the strategies of implementing the FTA in the case study project:-

113 a) Developing a process for overlapping dependent. By providing a formalized process for overlapping traditionally sequential activities, this work is the first step in eventually automating the process.

b) With the said soil predicament, the Design Engineers had come out with improvement of the PVD designs where the spacing of PVD was increased from 2.40m to 1.20m square spacing. This has resulted in tremendous acceleration of hydraulic extraction from the peat soil to allow settlement. c) Construction technology is one of the elements took place in expediting the earthwork process. Compaction of earth is one of the activities which constitute longest duration in the earthworks overall process. Using the normal conventional roller, the layer of compaction per lift is limited to 300 mm per layer but with the innovated construction technology i.e. the HIDPR compactor, the compaction per layer of lift could be done in 1.20 m and tremendous time saving of 4 times than the Traditional method had been achieved.

d) The other way of achieving the delivery of the LCCT project is by compressing Construction duration of each activity.

Instead of normal 8 hours of working, the additional 4 hours of overtime have been allowed and therefore, the total working hours has now increased to meet the Fixed Crashed Completion Period. The time saving expected through this approach is 50% approximately.

7.3

Objective 3: Evaluation of Time Saving

In this research objective, researcher has to evaluate the time saving achieved through the implementation of Fast Track Approach in the LCCT project. The researcher has come out with simulator schedules of each Fast Track elements

114 and comparing it with the Benchmark schedule. The results are listed in ascending saving as follows:-

a) Total time saving from closer PVD spacing: 23 days b) Total time saving from overlapping of activities: 127 days c) Total time saving from Schedule Compression: 195 days d) Total time saving from Construction technology: 218 days

7.4

Recommendation for Further Study

Undoubtedly, the Fast Track elements were proven to be the key factors that influencing the time compression of the implementation of the New LCCT Runway project.

Nevertheless, the coverage and parameter of this study only focuses on the physical work activities involved in the case study contributing to the time saving aspect. Issues on cost were not covered in detail as it is not form part of the overall scope of study. Furthermore, cost study could only be effective and relevant upon completion of the overall works where the projects final account had been finalized. The study then would be more realistic as all factors pertaining to cost and budget would be taken into account and these would involve Variation Orders, design changes as well as contingencies arising out of deterioration of site conditions and calamity on weather.

It is therefore recommended that further study on effects on cost by implementing Fast Track approach be carried out as the findings then would confirm whether or not Fast Track approach would benefit the client economically.

115 REFERENCES

Asmadi Ismail (2009) Scheduling Simulation for High-Rise Building Comparison on Time Impact FKA, UTM Masters Thesis

Baker, A C and Boyd, K J (1983) Fast-tracking for nuclear power plant construction. International Journal of Project Management

Barrie, D S and Paulson, B C (1992) Professional construction management: including C.M., design-construct, and general contracting. London: Mc Graw Hill.

Bell, L C and Stukhart, G (1986) Attributes of materials management systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

David N. Ford (2001) Impacts of Fast Track Processes on the Discovery of Changes ASCE Journal 2004

E.M. Velez-Vega, D.R. Bardt (2008) Fast-Track Construction of Runway 14-32 Pavement Rehabilitation at the Sarasota-Bradenton International Airport ASCE Journal 2008

Faniran, O O, Oluwoye, J O and Lenard, D J (1998) Interactions between construction planning and influence factors. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.

Fazio, P, Moselhi, O, Thberge, P and Revay, S (1988) Design impact of construction fast-track. Construction Management and Economic.

Harris, F and MacCaffer, R (2001) Modern Construction Management. London: Blackwell Science.

116

Jimmie W. Hinze (1998) Construction Planning and Scheduling Prentice Hall, Ohio

Kerzner, H (1995) Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling. 5th ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Kwakye A A (1991) Fast Track Construction. CIOB Occasional Paper No. 46.

Maizon Hashim, Melissa Chan Yuet Li, Ng Chu Yin, Ng sock Hooi, Shim Mong Heng & Tay Lee Yong (2007) Factors Influencing the Selection of Procurement Systems by Clients Faculty of QS, UTM Journal

Ogunlana, S O, Promkuntong, K, Jearkjirm, V (1996) Construction delays in a fastgrowing economy: comparing Thailand with other economies. International Journal of Project Management.

Rosli Abdul Rashid, Ismail Mat Taib, Wan Basiron Wan Ahmad, Md. Asrul Nasid, Wan Nordiana Wan Ali & Zainab Mohd. Zainordin (2007) Effect of Procurement Systems on the Performance of Construction Projects Faculty of QS, UTM Journal

Shaiful Amri Mansur (2004) Productivity Assessment and Schedule Compression Index For Construction Project Planning FKA, UTM pHD Thesis

Susan Bogus, James E. Diekmann, Keith R. Molenaar (2002) A Methodology to Reconfigure the Design-Construction Interface for Fast-Track Projects ASCE Journal 2004

The Aqua Group (2001) Tenders and Contract for Building Edition Blackwell Science, London

117

Williams, G V (1995) Fast track pros and cons: Considerations for industrial projects. Journal of Management in Engineering.

Yassiah Bissiri (1999) Fast-Track Approach to Mining Construction Project. University of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

APPENDICES

INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

Interview

1. What is the type of procurement system for this Fast Track Project? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________

2. Is there any special modification done in the procurement system to ensure significant time saving achievement? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________

3. Is the Fast Track Approach being used as basis of implementation schedule for LCCT Runway project? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________

4. What are the rationale adopting the Fast Track Approach in the implementation of this project? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________

5. How much time saving targeted compared with traditional approach? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________

6. How this contract system is aligned to achieve time compression which is critical for this project? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________

7. What is the justification for adopting Fast Track Approach in the project? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________

8. Did the project being divided into various different packages of work? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________

9. What strategies / methodologies being used for implementing the FTA in the project? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________

10. Is there any construction technology introduced to meet FTA goals? ________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________

11. What are the impacts resulting from Fast Track Approach (FTA) in:-

a) Time _____________________________________________________________ b) Cost _____________________________________________________________ c) Quality _____________________________________________________________

QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONS

Questionnaires

SECTION A: RESPONDENT BACKGROUND

Name Position Age Company Address

: ___________________________ (Optional) : ___________________________ : ___________________________ : ___________________________

Please tick the category relevant to you in the spaces provided 1) Nature of business

Developer

Contractor

Consultant

Other, state____

2)

Experience in construction industry

< 5 years

5 -10 years

11 15 years

>15 years

3)

Number of construction project been involved

1 to 3

4 to 6

7 to 10

> 10

SECTION B:

QUESTIONNAIRES

Instruction: Tick your opinion (one column only) from 1-5 in the boxes based on the indicator below

Scale indicator: 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree

The needs and rationale

1. Do you agree that the usage of Fast Track Approach is crucial project? for the LCCT

2. If the project is implemented in traditional system, can the goal of early completion be achieved?

3. Is the soil problem is a major hindrance in early

completion of the project

4. Do you agree that the FTA would benefit the client economically?

The strategies

1. Is

the

approach the

of work

overlapping process and

activities

suitable for the project?

2. Do

you

agree that

the

introduction of the following construction help technologies the thus

expedite work,

construction

achieving FTA objective?

a) Permeable Drain b) Dynamic machine

Vertical

compactor

3. Is the time compression approach also helps in the delivery of the project?

4. Do

you

agree into

that various

breakdown

different packages of work would contribute to the early delivery of the project?

Time saving & cost evaluation

1. Do

you

think

that of

the FTA

implementation

would benefit the client in terms of:-

a) Time b) Quality c) Cost

2. Is

the

Master Schedule

Implementation

using FTA helps foster the early achievement of

completion?

3. In your perspective, is the FTA can expedite the work process project? in the LCCT

MASTER IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE FOR LCCT RUNWAY PROJECT (WITH FAST TRACK ELEMENTS)

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCC TERMINAL AT KL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Task Name Duration Start Finish -2 -1 1 A M J PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG Appointment of KLIACS as PMC INCEPTION AND INITIATION Appointment of Air Space Consultant Airport Planner / Drainage Planner On Board Master Plan Requirement's Capture Airport Planning, Land Use and Design Brief Program of Requirement (POR) AIRPORT PLANNING Airport Planner Conceptual Design Concept Design Verification and Approval Development Order Application and Submission EIA Consultant Appointment EIA Study and Report Preparation (14 Weeks) EIA Approval D.O Approval Special Approval for Earth Work Commencement SITE PREPARATION EN 01 Enabling Work (Conventional) EN 01 Design Stage Appointment of Consultant Design Works EN 01 Procurement Process Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EN 01 Construction Site Clearing & Access for Site EARTHWORK EW 01 Site Preparation, Earthwork & Main Drain (Conventional) EW 01 Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Survey Data Verification & Confirmation Appointment of Soil Investigation (S.I.) Contractor Soil Investigation Works S.I Result & Prepare Report Design Works EW 01 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor 986 days 0 days 92 days 0 days 0 days 28 days 42 days 18 days 228 days 93 days 14 days 128 days 0 days 142 days 59 days 14 days 0 days 155 days 155 days 28 days 0 days 28 days 68 days 28 days 21 days 18 days 0 days 59 days 59 days 885 days 885 days 72 days 0 days 9 days 0 days 35 days 21 days 30 days 96 days 18 days 29 days 46 days 0 days Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Fri 3/7/09 Fri 14/8/09 Thu 25/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Tue 29/9/09 Tue 18/8/09 Tue 7/7/09 Wed 8/7/09 Tue 1/12/09 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 1/12/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Thu 23/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Thu 20/8/09 Fri 11/9/09 Thu 1/10/09 Fri 2/10/09 Fri 2/10/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Wed 1/7/09 Thu 2/7/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 2/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Mon 24/8/09 Mon 24/8/09 Mon 14/9/09 Thu 15/10/09 Tue 1/12/09 Wed 29/2/12 Mon 1/6/09 Tue 1/9/09 Mon 1/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 13/8/09 Tue 1/9/09 Mon 15/2/10 Mon 28/9/09 Mon 12/10/09 Wed 30/12/09 Tue 7/7/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 1/2/10 Mon 15/2/10 Tue 1/12/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 30/11/09 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 1/10/09 Wed 19/8/09 Thu 10/9/09 Wed 30/9/09 Thu 1/10/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 30/11/09 Sun 27/11/11 Sun 27/11/11 Fri 21/8/09 Wed 1/7/09 Fri 10/7/09 Thu 11/6/09 Wed 15/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Fri 21/8/09 Tue 1/12/09 Fri 11/9/09 Wed 14/10/09 Mon 30/11/09 Tue 1/12/09 24/8 14/9 15/10 11/9 14/10 30/11 1/12 11/6 2/7 23/7 2/7 1/7 10/7 11/6 15/7 22/7 21/8 EW 01 Procurement EW 01 Design Stage 2/10 23/7 20/8 11/9 19/8 10/9 30/9 1/10 EN 01 Construction 30/11 EARTHWORK EW 01 Site Preparation, Earthwork & Main Drain (Co 25/6 8/7 1/12 2/2 1/12 SITE PREPARATION EN 01 Enabling Work (Conventional) EN 01 Design Stage 24/6 22/7 EN 01 Procurement Process 18/8 7/7 30/11 1/2 15/2 25/6 29/9 28/9 12/10 30/12 25/6 3/7 14/8 1/6 24/6 22/7 13/8 1/9 AIRPORT PLANNING 2010 2011 2012 2013 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCC 1/6 INCEPTION AND INITIATION

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 1

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCC TERMINAL AT KL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ID 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 Task Name Duration Start Finish -2 -1 1 A M J EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork Mobilization and Site Preparation ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg - (2.0 mths) - TB01A Zone G Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone G Preloading End ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg - (2.0 mths) - TB01B Zone H Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone H Preloading End ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel - (2.0 mths) TB01B Zone G1 Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone G1 Preloading End ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) - (6.5 mths) TB02B Zone F Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F Preloading End ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) - (7.0 mths) TB02B Zone F1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F1 Preloading End ZONE F2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross taxiway ( Left Wing) - (3.5 mths) AF02 Zone F2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F2 Preloading End ZONE E ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) - (4.0 mths) TB02A Zone E Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E Preloading End ZONE E1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) - (3.5 mths) TB02A Zone E1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E1 Preloading End ZONE E2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Taxiway (Right Wing) - (2.5 mths) AF02 Zone E2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E2 Preloading End ZONE J ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Left Wing) - (3.0 mths) AF02 Zone J Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone J Preloading End ZONE K ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (8.5 mths) AF02 Zone K Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone K Preloading End ZONE K1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (12.0 mths) AF02 ZONE D ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area Integrated Complex, Transport Hub, etc - (3.0 m) Zone D Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone D Preloading End 688 days 434 days 22 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 194 days 0 days 0 days 210 days 0 days 0 days 108 days 0 days 0 days 119 days 0 days 0 days 105 days 0 days 0 days 78 days 0 days 0 days 89 days 0 days 0 days 253 days 0 days 0 days 360 days 91 days 0 days 0 days Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Sat 2/1/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Sat 15/5/10 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 28/2/11 Sat 2/1/10 Fri 30/4/10 Sun 31/10/10 Thu 1/4/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 31/3/10 Thu 30/9/10 Sat 2/1/10 Mon 13/9/10 Tue 15/3/11 Sat 2/1/10 Thu 15/4/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Sun 27/11/11 Wed 16/3/11 Sat 23/1/10 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Thu 15/7/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Sat 31/7/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 28/2/11 Fri 30/4/10 Fri 30/4/10 Sun 31/10/10 Thu 15/7/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Sat 31/7/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 31/3/10 Thu 30/9/10 Mon 13/9/10 Mon 13/9/10 Tue 15/3/11 Fri 31/12/10 Thu 15/7/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 2/1 15/4 15/7 15/7 15/1 31/12 2/1 2/1 31/3 31/3 30/9 13/9 13/9 15/3 15/5 31/7 31/7 31/1 1/4 15/7 15/7 15/1 2/1 30/4 30/4 31/10 15/5 30/8 30/8 28/2 2/1 31/7 31/7 31/1 2/1 2/1 28/2 28/2 15/6 15/7 15/7 15/1 2/1 28/2 28/2 15/6 2/1 2/1 23/1 28/2 28/2 15/6 2010 2011 2012 2013 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 2

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCC TERMINAL AT KL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ID 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 Task Name ZONE I ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area Approach Road, etc - (3.0 mths)~ AF02,LF05/06 Zone I Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I Preloading End ZONE I1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Parking Apron - (7.0 mths) ~ TB02A & TB02B Zone I1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I1 Preloading End ZONE I2 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - etc (4.5 mths) ~ AF02 Zone I2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I2 Preloading End ZONE E3A ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (2.0 mths) AF02 Zone E3A Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3A Preloading End EW01 Relocation Area UT 03A Relocation of Services(Conventional) UT 03A Design Stage Design Works UT 03A Procurement Appointment of Contractor UT 03A Construction + Remaining Earthworks Relocation of Security Service Road & Fence - adjacent to Rwy2 area (Area E3B & L1 5.5 mths) New Pump Station & Associated Works (7.5 mths) Relocation of Services + Lay New Pipe (adjacent to Rwy2 area)-Area E3 & L 5.5 mths New Pump Station A Substation & Associated Works (7.0 mths) ICT Relocation Works (3.5 mths) ZONE E3B ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Adjacent to Rwy2 -Area E3B Zone E3B Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3B Preloading End ZONE E3 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area - (2.0 mths) Zone E3 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3 Preloading End ZONE L1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area - (2.0 mths) - Without ZONE L ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area - (2.0 mths) Zone L Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone L Preloading End EW 01A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain at Cogen and ACTL - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 01A Procurement Appointment of Contractor EW 01A Construction Mobilization, Site Preparation & Soil Investigation Zone A (Hotel) Construction (5 months) Zone A Preloading Start (4 months) Task Critical Task Progress Milestone Duration 89 days 0 days 0 days 210 days 0 days 0 days 137 days 0 days 0 days 61 days 0 days 0 days 688 days 688 days 58 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 558 days 171 days 223 days 193 days 208 days 105 days 59 days 0 days 0 days 75 days 0 days 0 days 59 days 75 days 0 days 0 days 289 days 0 days 0 days 289 days 14 days 158 days 0 days Start Sat 2/1/10 Wed 31/3/10 Thu 30/9/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Sun 2/5/10 Thu 16/9/10 Wed 16/3/11 Thu 1/7/10 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 28/2/11 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 12/5/10 Thu 13/5/10 Thu 13/5/10 Sun 1/8/10 Wed 1/9/10 Sun 1/8/10 Sat 16/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Fri 31/12/10 Thu 30/6/11 Wed 16/3/11 Mon 30/5/11 Sun 27/11/11 Mon 1/11/10 Wed 16/3/11 Mon 30/5/11 Sun 27/11/11 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 29/5/10 Wed 3/11/10 Summary Project Summary Page 3 Finish -2 -1 1 A M J Wed 31/3/10 Wed 31/3/10 Thu 30/9/10 Sat 31/7/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Thu 16/9/10 Thu 16/9/10 Wed 16/3/11 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 28/2/11 Sun 27/11/11 Sun 27/11/11 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 12/5/10 Sun 27/11/11 Sun 31/10/10 Tue 15/3/11 Tue 15/3/11 Mon 28/2/11 Mon 31/1/11 Fri 31/12/10 Fri 31/12/10 Thu 30/6/11 Mon 30/5/11 Mon 30/5/11 Sun 27/11/11 Fri 31/12/10 Mon 30/5/11 Mon 30/5/11 Sun 27/11/11 Thu 3/3/11 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Thu 3/3/11 Fri 28/5/10 Wed 3/11/10 Wed 3/11/10 External Tasks External Milestone Deadline 15/5 29/5 28/5 3/11 3/11 14/5 14/5 EW 01A Construction 1/11 31/12 16/3 30/5 30/5 27/11 EW 01A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain at Cogen and ACTL - RWY3 (Conventional) 16/3 30/5 30/5 27/11 1/8 16/10 1/11 13/5 1/8 1/9 31/10 15/3 15/3 28/2 31/1 31/12 31/12 30/6 2/1 UT 03A Design Stage 28/2 12/5 12/5 UT 03A Construction + Remaining Earthworks 1/7 30/8 30/8 28/2 EW01 Relocation Area UT 03A Relocation of Services(Conventional) 2/5 16/9 16/9 16/3 2/1 31/7 31/7 31/1 2010 2011 2012 2013 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A 2/1 31/3 31/3 30/9

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCC TERMINAL AT KL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ID 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 Task Name Zone A Preloading End Zone A1 (ACTL-West Tower) Construction (3.0 month) Zone A1 Preloading Start (4 months) Zone A1 Preloading End Zone B (Car Park) Construction (4 months) Zone B Preloading Start (4 months) Zone B Preloading End Zone C (District Cooling Plant & Sub-station) Construction (3 months) Zone C Preloading Start (4 months) Zone C Preloading End EW 02A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 02A Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Survey Data Verification & Confirmation Appointment of Soil Investigation (S.I.) Contractor Soil Investigation Works S.I Result & Prepare Report Design Works EW 02A Procurement (Area 1) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 1) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 9.5 months) Area 1 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 1 Preloading End EW 02A Procurement (Area 2) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 2) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 1.5 months) Area 2 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 2 Preloading End EW 02A Procurement (Area 3) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor Duration 0 days 97 days 0 days 0 days 127 days 0 days 0 days 96 days 0 days 0 days 793 days 87 days 0 days 9 days 0 days 29 days 23 days 32 days 99 days 23 days 24 days 49 days 0 days 539 days 19 days 345 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 40 days 21 days 40 days 0 days 294 days 7 days 105 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 40 days 21 days 40 days 0 days Start Thu 3/3/11 Thu 29/7/10 Wed 3/11/10 Thu 3/3/11 Tue 29/6/10 Wed 3/11/10 Thu 3/3/11 Tue 29/6/10 Sun 3/10/10 Wed 2/2/11 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Mon 3/8/09 Mon 24/8/09 Thu 17/9/09 Wed 21/10/09 Wed 21/10/09 Fri 13/11/09 Tue 8/12/09 Mon 1/2/10 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 16/2/10 Mon 31/1/11 Sun 31/7/11 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Mon 11/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 22/12/10 Thu 7/4/11 Sat 8/10/11 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Mon 11/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Tue 14/12/10 Finish -2 -1 1 A M J Thu 3/3/11 Wed 3/11/10 Wed 3/11/10 Thu 3/3/11 Wed 3/11/10 Wed 3/11/10 Thu 3/3/11 Sun 3/10/10 Sun 3/10/10 Wed 2/2/11 Sat 8/10/11 Tue 20/10/09 Wed 22/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Tue 1/9/09 Wed 16/9/09 Tue 20/10/09 Mon 1/2/10 Thu 12/11/09 Mon 7/12/09 Fri 29/1/10 Mon 1/2/10 Sun 31/7/11 Sat 20/2/10 Mon 31/1/11 Mon 31/1/11 Sun 31/7/11 Tue 14/12/10 Sun 10/10/10 Sun 31/10/10 Fri 10/12/10 Tue 14/12/10 Sat 8/10/11 Tue 21/12/10 Thu 7/4/11 Thu 7/4/11 Sat 8/10/11 Tue 14/12/10 Sun 10/10/10 Sun 31/10/10 Fri 10/12/10 Tue 14/12/10 1/9 11/10 1/11 10/10 31/10 10/12 14/12 EW 02A Procurement (Area 3) 15/12 22/12 21/12 7/4 7/4 8/10 1/9 11/10 1/11 10/10 31/10 10/12 14/12 EW 02A Construction (Area 2) 2/2 16/2 20/2 31/1 31/1 31/7 EW 02A Procurement (Area 2) 21/10 13/11 8/12 12/11 7/12 29/1 1/2 EW 02A Construction (Area 1) 3/8 24/8 17/9 23/7 22/7 31/7 31/7 1/9 16/9 20/10 EW 02A Procurement (Area 1) EW 02A Design Stage 29/6 3/10 3/10 2/2 EW 02A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain - RWY3 (Convention 29/6 3/11 3/11 3/3 2010 2011 2012 2013 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A 3/3 29/7 3/11 3/11 3/3

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 4

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCC TERMINAL AT KL INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MASTER IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ID 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 Task Name Duration Start Finish -2 -1 1 A M J EW 02A Construction (Area 3) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 1.5 months) Area 3 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 3 Preloading End AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (Conventional) AF 01 Design Stage Appoinment of Design Consultant Design Works AF 01 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor AF 01 Construction Mobilization Received Access 1.3KM from EW02A Firtst 1.3 km Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (4.0 months) Remaining area of Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (4.0 months) AF 02 Cross Taxiway Between RWY2 & RWY3 (Conventional) AF 02 Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Design Works AF 02 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor AF 02 Construction Mobilization Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE K (1.0 month) Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE E2 (1.5 month) Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE I2 (4.0 months) Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE F2 (1.5 month) At Relocation area Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3B & L1 (4 months) Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3 & L (3 months) 294 days 7 days 105 days 0 days 0 days 906 days 883 days 216 days 0 days 124 days 149 days 57 days 45 days 46 days 0 days 217 days 30 days 0 days 120 days 118 days 906 days 336 days 0 days 116 days 120 days 31 days 45 days 44 days 0 days 375 days 30 days 31 days 45 days 120 days 46 days 240 days 122 days 91 days Wed 15/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 22/12/10 Thu 7/4/11 Sat 8/10/11 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Mon 23/11/09 Mon 3/1/11 Mon 3/1/11 Tue 1/3/11 Fri 15/4/11 Wed 1/6/11 Fri 1/7/11 Fri 1/7/11 Mon 1/8/11 Tue 2/8/11 Sun 9/10/11 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Mon 5/4/10 Fri 15/10/10 Fri 15/10/10 Mon 15/11/10 Sun 2/1/11 Mon 14/2/11 Tue 15/2/11 Tue 15/2/11 Sat 16/7/11 Tue 16/8/11 Thu 17/3/11 Sat 1/10/11 Fri 1/7/11 Fri 1/7/11 Mon 28/11/11 Sat 8/10/11 Tue 21/12/10 Thu 7/4/11 Thu 7/4/11 Sat 8/10/11 Wed 29/2/12 Mon 6/2/12 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 1/6/11 Mon 28/2/11 Thu 14/4/11 Tue 31/5/11 Wed 1/6/11 Mon 6/2/12 Sat 30/7/11 Mon 1/8/11 Wed 30/11/11 Mon 6/2/12 Wed 29/2/12 Fri 30/7/10 Wed 19/8/09 Fri 30/7/10 Mon 14/2/11 Sun 14/11/10 Fri 31/12/10 Mon 14/2/11 Mon 14/2/11 Wed 29/2/12 Wed 16/3/11 Mon 15/8/11 Fri 30/9/11 Fri 15/7/11 Tue 15/11/11 Wed 29/2/12 Mon 31/10/11 Wed 29/2/12 1/7 31/10 28/11 29/2 17/3 15/2 16/3 16/7 16/8 15/7 1/10 15/11 At Relocation area 15/8 30/9 15/10 15/11 2/1 14/11 31/12 14/2 14/2 AF 02 Construction 19/8 5/4 30/7 AF 02 Procurement AF 02 Design Stage 2/8 9/10 1/7 30/7 1/8 30/11 6/2 AF 02 Cross Taxiway Between RWY2 & R 3/1 1/3 15/4 28/2 14/4 31/5 1/6 AF 01 Construction 19/8 23/11 31/3 AF 01 Procurement AF 01 Design Stage 2010 2011 2012 2013 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A EW 02A Construction (Area 3) 15/12 22/12 21/12 7/4 7/4 8/10 AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (Conventi

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 5

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE (WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CLOSER PVD SPACING)

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CLOSER PVD SPACING
ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Task Name PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG Appointment of KLIACS as PMC INCEPTION AND INITIATION Appointment of Air Space Consultant Airport Planner / Drainage Planner On Board Master Plan Requirement's Capture Airport Planning, Land Use and Design Brief Program of Requirement (POR) AIRPORT PLANNING Airport Planner Conceptual Design Concept Design Verification and Approval Development Order Application and Submission EIA Consultant Appointment EIA Study and Report Preparation (14 Weeks) EIA Approval D.O Approval Special Approval for Earth Work Commencement SITE PREPARATION EN 01 Enabling Work (Conventional) EN 01 Design Stage Appointment of Consultant Design Works EN 01 Procurement Process Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EN 01 Construction Site Clearing & Access for Site EARTHWORK EW 01 Site Preparation, Earthwork & Main Drain (Conventional) EW 01 Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Survey Data Verification & Confirmation Appointment of Soil Investigation (S.I.) Contractor Soil Investigation Works S.I Result & Prepare Report Design Works EW 01 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor Duration 1009 days 0 days 92 days 0 days 0 days 28 days 42 days 18 days 228 days 93 days 14 days 128 days 0 days 142 days 59 days 14 days 0 days 155 days 155 days 28 days 0 days 28 days 68 days 28 days 21 days 18 days 0 days 59 days 59 days 908 days 908 days 72 days 0 days 9 days 0 days 35 days 21 days 30 days 96 days 18 days 29 days 46 days 0 days Start Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Fri 3/7/09 Fri 14/8/09 Thu 25/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Tue 29/9/09 Tue 18/8/09 Tue 7/7/09 Wed 8/7/09 Tue 1/12/09 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 1/12/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Thu 23/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Thu 20/8/09 Fri 11/9/09 Thu 1/10/09 Fri 2/10/09 Fri 2/10/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Wed 1/7/09 Thu 2/7/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 2/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Mon 24/8/09 Mon 24/8/09 Mon 14/9/09 Thu 15/10/09 Tue 1/12/09 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Qu A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M Fri 23/3/12 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCC 1/6 INCEPTION AND INITIATION 1/6 24/6 25/6 3/7 14/8 22/7 13/8 1/9 AIRPORT PLANNING 25/6 29/9 18/8 7/7 8/7 1/12 2/2 1/12 SITE PREPARATION EN 01 Enabling Work (Conventional) EN 01 Design Stage 24/6 25/6 22/7 EN 01 Procurement Process 23/7 20/8 11/9 19/8 10/9 30/9 1/10 EN 01 Construction 2/10 30/11 EARTHWORK EW 01 Site Preparation, Earthwork & Main Drain (Co EW 01 Design Stage 1/7 2/7 10/7 11/6 11/6 2/7 23/7 15/7 22/7 21/8 EW 01 Procurement 24/8 14/9 15/10 11/9 14/10 30/11 1/12 30/11 1/2 15/2 28/9 12/10 30/12

Mon 1/6/09 Tue 1/9/09 Mon 1/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 13/8/09 Tue 1/9/09 Mon 15/2/10 Mon 28/9/09 Mon 12/10/09 Wed 30/12/09 Tue 7/7/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 1/2/10 Mon 15/2/10 Tue 1/12/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 30/11/09 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 1/10/09 Wed 19/8/09 Thu 10/9/09 Wed 30/9/09 Thu 1/10/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 30/11/09 Wed 21/12/11 Wed 21/12/11 Fri 21/8/09 Wed 1/7/09 Fri 10/7/09 Thu 11/6/09 Wed 15/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Fri 21/8/09 Tue 1/12/09 Fri 11/9/09 Wed 14/10/09 Mon 30/11/09 Tue 1/12/09

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 1

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CLOSER PVD SPACING
ID 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 Task Name EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork Mobilization and Site Preparation ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg - (2.0 mths) - TB01A Zone G Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone G Preloading End ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg - (2.0 mths) - TB01B Zone H Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone H Preloading End ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel - (2.0 mths) TB01B Zone G1 Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone G1 Preloading End ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) - (6.5 mths) TB02B Zone F Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F Preloading End ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) - (7.0 mths) TB02B Zone F1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F1 Preloading End ZONE F2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross taxiway ( Left Wing) - (3.5 mths) AF02 Zone F2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F2 Preloading End ZONE E ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) - (4.0 mths) TB02A Zone E Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E Preloading End ZONE E1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) - (3.5 mths) TB02A Zone E1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E1 Preloading End ZONE E2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Taxiway (Right Wing) - (2.5 mths) AF02 Zone E2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E2 Preloading End ZONE J ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Left Wing) - (3.0 mths) AF02 Zone J Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone J Preloading End ZONE K ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (8.5 mths) AF02 Zone K Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone K Preloading End ZONE K1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (12.0 mths) AF02 ZONE D ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area Integrated Complex, Transport Hub, etc - (3.0 m) Zone D Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone D Preloading End ZONE I ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area Approach Road, etc - (3.0 mths)~ AF02,LF05/06 Task Critical Task Progress Milestone Duration 711 days 509 days 22 days 75 days 0 days 0 days 75 days 0 days 0 days 75 days 0 days 0 days 252 days 0 days 0 days 273 days 0 days 0 days 140 days 0 days 0 days 155 days 0 days 0 days 137 days 0 days 0 days 101 days 0 days 0 days 116 days 0 days 0 days 329 days 0 days 0 days 468 days 118 days 0 days 0 days 116 days Start Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 17/3/10 Fri 2/7/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 17/3/10 Fri 2/7/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 17/3/10 Fri 2/7/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 12/9/10 Mon 14/3/11 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 3/10/10 Mon 4/4/11 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 2/10/10 Fri 1/4/11 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 6/6/10 Mon 6/12/10 Thu 1/4/10 Mon 16/8/10 Wed 16/2/11 Sat 15/5/10 Mon 23/8/10 Wed 23/2/11 Sat 2/1/10 Tue 27/4/10 Wed 27/10/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 28/11/10 Tue 31/5/11 Sat 2/1/10 Thu 15/4/10 Wed 11/8/10 Fri 11/2/11 Sat 2/1/10 2010 2011 2012 2013 nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Qu A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M Wed 21/12/11 EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) Finish Tue 31/5/11 Sat 23/1/10 Wed 17/3/10 Wed 17/3/10 Fri 2/7/10 Wed 17/3/10 Wed 17/3/10 Fri 2/7/10 Wed 17/3/10 Wed 17/3/10 Fri 2/7/10 Sun 12/9/10 Sun 12/9/10 Mon 14/3/11 Sun 3/10/10 Sun 3/10/10 Mon 4/4/11 Sat 2/10/10 Sat 2/10/10 Fri 1/4/11 Sun 6/6/10 Sun 6/6/10 Mon 6/12/10 Mon 16/8/10 Mon 16/8/10 Wed 16/2/11 Mon 23/8/10 Mon 23/8/10 Wed 23/2/11 Tue 27/4/10 Tue 27/4/10 Wed 27/10/10 Sun 28/11/10 Sun 28/11/10 Tue 31/5/11 Tue 19/4/11 Wed 11/8/10 Wed 11/8/10 Fri 11/2/11 Tue 27/4/10 2/1 External Tasks External Milestone Page 2 27/4 Deadline 2/1 15/4 11/8 11/8 11/2 19/4 2/1 2/1 27/4 27/4 27/10 28/11 28/11 31/5 15/5 23/8 23/8 23/2 1/4 16/8 16/8 16/2 2/1 6/6 6/6 6/12 15/5 2/10 2/10 1/4 2/1 3/10 3/10 4/4 2/1 2/1 17/3 17/3 2/7 12/9 12/9 14/3 2/1 17/3 17/3 2/7 2/1 2/1 23/1 17/3 17/3 2/7 EW01 Earthwork

Summary Project Summary

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CLOSER PVD SPACING
ID 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 Task Name Zone I Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I Preloading End ZONE I1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Parking Apron - (7.0 mths) ~ TB02A & TB02B Zone I1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I1 Preloading End ZONE I2 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - etc (4.5 mths) ~ AF02 Zone I2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I2 Preloading End ZONE E3A ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (2.0 mths) AF02 Zone E3A Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3A Preloading End EW01 Relocation Area UT 03A Relocation of Services(Conventional) UT 03A Design Stage Design Works UT 03A Procurement Appointment of Contractor UT 03A Construction + Remaining Earthworks Relocation of Security Service Road & Fence - adjacent to Rwy2 area (Area E3B & L1 5.5 mths) New Pump Station & Associated Works (7.5 mths) Relocation of Services + Lay New Pipe (adjacent to Rwy2 area)-Area E3 & L 5.5 mths New Pump Station A Substation & Associated Works (7.0 mths) ICT Relocation Works (3.5 mths) ZONE E3B ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Adjacent to Rwy2 -Area E3B Zone E3B Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3B Preloading End ZONE E3 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area - (2.0 mths) Zone E3 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3 Preloading End ZONE L1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area - (2.0 mths) - Without ZONE L ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area - (2.0 mths) Zone L Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone L Preloading End EW 01A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain at Cogen and ACTL - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 01A Procurement Appointment of Contractor EW 01A Construction Mobilization, Site Preparation & Soil Investigation Zone A (Hotel) Construction (5 months) Zone A Preloading Start (4 months) Zone A Preloading End Duration 0 days 0 days 273 days 0 days 0 days 178 days 0 days 0 days 79 days 0 days 0 days 711 days 711 days 58 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 581 days 171 days 223 days 193 days 208 days 105 days 77 days 0 days 0 days 98 days 0 days 0 days 77 days 98 days 0 days 0 days 336 days 0 days 0 days 336 days 14 days 205 days 0 days 0 days Start Tue 27/4/10 Wed 27/10/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 3/10/10 Mon 4/4/11 Sun 2/5/10 Wed 27/10/10 Tue 26/4/11 Thu 1/7/10 Sat 18/9/10 Fri 18/3/11 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 12/5/10 Thu 13/5/10 Thu 13/5/10 Sun 1/8/10 Wed 1/9/10 Sun 1/8/10 Sat 16/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Wed 19/1/11 Mon 18/7/11 Wed 16/3/11 Wed 22/6/11 Wed 21/12/11 Mon 1/11/10 Wed 16/3/11 Wed 22/6/11 Wed 21/12/11 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 29/5/10 Tue 21/12/10 Tue 19/4/11 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Qu A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M Tue 27/4/10 27/4 27/10 2/1 3/10 3/10 4/4 2/5 27/10 27/10 26/4 1/7 18/9 18/9 18/3 EW01 Relocation Area UT 03A Relocation of Services(Conventional) UT 03A Design Stage 2/1 28/2 12/5 12/5 UT 03A Construction + Remaining Earthworks 13/5 1/8 1/9 1/8 16/10 1/11 31/10 15/3 15/3 28/2 31/1 19/1 19/1 18/7 16/3 22/6 22/6 21/12 1/11 19/1 16/3 22/6 22/6 21/12 EW 01A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain at Cogen and ACTL - RWY3 (Convention 14/5 14/5 EW 01A Construction 15/5 29/5 28/5 21/12 21/12 19/4

Wed 27/10/10 Sun 3/10/10 Sun 3/10/10 Mon 4/4/11 Wed 27/10/10 Wed 27/10/10 Tue 26/4/11 Sat 18/9/10 Sat 18/9/10 Fri 18/3/11 Wed 21/12/11 Wed 21/12/11 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 21/12/11 Sun 31/10/10 Tue 15/3/11 Tue 15/3/11 Mon 28/2/11 Mon 31/1/11 Wed 19/1/11 Wed 19/1/11 Mon 18/7/11 Wed 22/6/11 Wed 22/6/11 Wed 21/12/11 Wed 19/1/11 Wed 22/6/11 Wed 22/6/11 Wed 21/12/11 Tue 19/4/11 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Tue 19/4/11 Fri 28/5/10 Tue 21/12/10 Tue 21/12/10 Tue 19/4/11

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 3

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CLOSER PVD SPACING
ID 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 Task Name Zone A1 (ACTL-West Tower) Construction (3.0 month) Zone A1 Preloading Start (4 months) Zone A1 Preloading End Zone B (Car Park) Construction (4 months) Zone B Preloading Start (4 months) Zone B Preloading End Zone C (District Cooling Plant & Sub-station) Construction (3 months) Zone C Preloading Start (4 months) Zone C Preloading End EW 02A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 02A Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Survey Data Verification & Confirmation Appointment of Soil Investigation (S.I.) Contractor Soil Investigation Works S.I Result & Prepare Report Design Works EW 02A Procurement (Area 1) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 1) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 9.5 months) Area 1 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 1 Preloading End EW 02A Procurement (Area 2) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 2) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 1.5 months) Area 2 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 2 Preloading End EW 02A Procurement (Area 3) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 3) Duration 126 days 0 days 0 days 165 days 0 days 0 days 125 days 0 days 0 days 829 days 87 days 0 days 9 days 0 days 29 days 23 days 32 days 99 days 23 days 24 days 49 days 0 days 643 days 19 days 449 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 40 days 21 days 40 days 0 days 326 days 7 days 137 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 40 days 21 days 40 days 0 days 326 days Start Thu 29/7/10 Thu 2/12/10 Fri 1/4/11 Tue 29/6/10 Sun 12/12/10 Sun 10/4/11 Tue 29/6/10 Mon 1/11/10 Thu 3/3/11 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Mon 3/8/09 Mon 24/8/09 Thu 17/9/09 Wed 21/10/09 Wed 21/10/09 Fri 13/11/09 Tue 8/12/09 Mon 1/2/10 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 16/2/10 Mon 16/5/11 Sun 13/11/11 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Mon 11/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 22/12/10 Tue 10/5/11 Wed 9/11/11 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Mon 11/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Qu A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M Thu 2/12/10 29/7 2/12 Thu 2/12/10 Fri 1/4/11 Sun 12/12/10 Sun 12/12/10 Sun 10/4/11 Mon 1/11/10 Mon 1/11/10 Thu 3/3/11 Sun 13/11/11 Tue 20/10/09 Wed 22/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Tue 1/9/09 Wed 16/9/09 Tue 20/10/09 Mon 1/2/10 Thu 12/11/09 Mon 7/12/09 Fri 29/1/10 Mon 1/2/10 Sun 13/11/11 Sat 20/2/10 Mon 16/5/11 Mon 16/5/11 Sun 13/11/11 Tue 14/12/10 Sun 10/10/10 Sun 31/10/10 Fri 10/12/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 9/11/11 Tue 21/12/10 Tue 10/5/11 Tue 10/5/11 Wed 9/11/11 Tue 14/12/10 Sun 10/10/10 Sun 31/10/10 Fri 10/12/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 9/11/11 1/9 11/10 1/11 10/10 31/10 10/12 14/12 EW 02A Construction (Area 3) EW 02A Procurement (Area 3) 15/12 22/12 21/12 10/5 10/5 9/11 1/9 11/10 1/11 10/10 31/10 10/12 14/12 EW 02A Construction (Area 2) EW 02A Procurement (Area 2) 2/2 16/2 20/2 16/5 16/5 13/11 21/10 13/11 8/12 12/11 7/12 29/1 1/2 EW 02A Construction (Area 1) 3/8 24/8 17/9 23/7 22/7 31/7 31/7 1/9 16/9 20/10 EW 02A Procurement (Area 1) EW 02A Design Stage 29/6 1/11 1/11 3/3 EW 02A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain - RWY3 (Conventi 29/6 12/12 12/12 10/4 2/12 1/4

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 4

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CLOSER PVD SPACING
ID 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 Task Name Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 1.5 months) Area 3 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 3 Preloading End AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (Conventional) AF 01 Design Stage Appoinment of Design Consultant Design Works AF 01 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor AF 01 Construction Mobilization Received Access 1.3KM from EW02A Firtst 1.3 km Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (4.0 months) Remaining area of Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (4.0 months) AF 02 Cross Taxiway Between RWY2 & RWY3 (Conventional) AF 02 Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Design Works AF 02 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor AF 02 Construction Mobilization Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE K (1.0 month) Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE E2 (1.5 month) Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE I2 (4.0 months) Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE F2 (1.5 month) At Relocation area Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3B & L1 (4 months) Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3 & L (3 months) Duration 7 days 137 days 0 days 0 days 929 days 922 days 216 days 0 days 124 days 149 days 57 days 45 days 46 days 0 days 204 days 30 days 0 days 120 days 118 days 929 days 336 days 0 days 116 days 120 days 31 days 45 days 44 days 0 days 358 days 30 days 31 days 45 days 120 days 46 days 245 days 122 days 91 days Start Wed 15/12/10 Wed 22/12/10 Tue 10/5/11 Wed 9/11/11 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Mon 23/11/09 Mon 3/1/11 Mon 3/1/11 Tue 1/3/11 Fri 15/4/11 Wed 1/6/11 Mon 22/8/11 Mon 22/8/11 Mon 14/11/11 Tue 15/11/11 Thu 10/11/11 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Mon 5/4/10 Wed 24/11/10 Wed 24/11/10 Mon 27/12/10 Fri 11/2/11 Sat 26/3/11 Sun 27/3/11 Sun 27/3/11 Fri 26/8/11 Tue 27/9/11 Wed 27/4/11 Fri 11/11/11 Tue 19/7/11 Tue 19/7/11 Thu 22/12/11 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Quart rd Quarte th Quarte st Quarte nd Qu A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M Tue 21/12/10 15/12 21/12 Tue 10/5/11 Tue 10/5/11 Wed 9/11/11 Fri 23/3/12 Fri 16/3/12 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 1/6/11 Mon 28/2/11 Thu 14/4/11 Tue 31/5/11 Wed 1/6/11 Fri 16/3/12 Wed 21/9/11 Mon 14/11/11 Fri 16/3/12 Fri 9/3/12 Fri 23/3/12 Fri 30/7/10 Wed 19/8/09 Fri 30/7/10 Sat 26/3/11 Sun 26/12/10 Thu 10/2/11 Sat 26/3/11 Sat 26/3/11 Fri 23/3/12 Mon 25/4/11 Mon 26/9/11 Thu 10/11/11 Thu 25/8/11 Wed 28/12/11 Fri 23/3/12 Fri 18/11/11 Fri 23/3/12 19/7 18/11 22/12 23/3 27/4 27/3 25/4 26/8 27/9 25/8 11/11 28/12 At Relocation area 26/9 10/11 24/11 27/12 11/2 26/12 10/2 26/3 26/3 AF 02 Construction 19/8 5/4 30/7 AF 02 Procurement AF 02 Design Stage 15/11 10/11 22/8 21/9 14/11 16/3 9/3 AF 02 Cross Taxiway Between RWY2 & R 3/1 1/3 15/4 28/2 14/4 31/5 1/6 AF 01 Construction 19/8 23/11 31/3 AF 01 Procurement AF 01 Design Stage 22/12 10/5 10/5 9/11 AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (Conve

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 5

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE (WITHOUT ELEMENT OF OVERLAPPING ACTIVITIES)

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF OVERLAPPING ACTIVITIES (FINISH TO START BASIS)
ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Task Name Duration Start Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N Fri 6/7/12 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT 1/6 INCEPTION AND INITIATION 1/6 24/6 25/6 3/7 14/8 22/7 13/8 1/9 AIRPORT PLANNING 25/6 29/9 18/8 7/7 8/7 1/12 2/2 1/12 SITE PREPARATION EN 01 Enabling Work (Conventional) EN 01 Design Stage 24/6 25/6 22/7 EN 01 Procurement Process 23/7 20/8 11/9 19/8 10/9 30/9 1/10 EN 01 Construction 2/10 30/11 EARTHWORK EW 01 Site Preparation, Earthwork & Main Drain (Conventional) EW 01 Design Stage 1/7 2/7 10/7 11/6 11/6 2/7 23/7 15/7 22/7 21/8 EW 01 Procurement 24/8 14/9 15/10 11/9 14/10 30/11 1/12 EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) 30/11 1/2 15/2 28/9 12/10 30/12

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG Appointment of KLIACS as PMC INCEPTION AND INITIATION Appointment of Air Space Consultant Airport Planner / Drainage Planner On Board Master Plan Requirement's Capture Airport Planning, Land Use and Design Brief Program of Requirement (POR) AIRPORT PLANNING Airport Planner Conceptual Design Concept Design Verification and Approval Development Order Application and Submission EIA Consultant Appointment EIA Study and Report Preparation (14 Weeks) EIA Approval D.O Approval Special Approval for Earth Work Commencement SITE PREPARATION EN 01 Enabling Work (Conventional) EN 01 Design Stage Appointment of Consultant Design Works EN 01 Procurement Process Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EN 01 Construction Site Clearing & Access for Site EARTHWORK EW 01 Site Preparation, Earthwork & Main Drain (Conventional) EW 01 Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Survey Data Verification & Confirmation Appointment of Soil Investigation (S.I.) Contractor Soil Investigation Works S.I Result & Prepare Report Design Works EW 01 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works)

1113 days 0 days 92 days 0 days 0 days 28 days 42 days 18 days 228 days 93 days 14 days 128 days 0 days 142 days 59 days 14 days 0 days 155 days 155 days 28 days 0 days 28 days 68 days 28 days 21 days 18 days 0 days 59 days 59 days 885 days 885 days 72 days 0 days 9 days 0 days 35 days 21 days 30 days 96 days 18 days 29 days 46 days 0 days 688 days

Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Fri 3/7/09 Fri 14/8/09 Thu 25/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Tue 29/9/09 Tue 18/8/09 Tue 7/7/09 Wed 8/7/09 Tue 1/12/09 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 1/12/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Thu 23/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Thu 20/8/09 Fri 11/9/09 Thu 1/10/09 Fri 2/10/09 Fri 2/10/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Wed 1/7/09 Thu 2/7/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 2/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Mon 24/8/09 Mon 24/8/09 Mon 14/9/09 Thu 15/10/09 Tue 1/12/09 Sat 2/1/10

Mon 1/6/09 Tue 1/9/09 Mon 1/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 13/8/09 Tue 1/9/09 Mon 15/2/10 Mon 28/9/09 Mon 12/10/09 Wed 30/12/09 Tue 7/7/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 1/2/10 Mon 15/2/10 Tue 1/12/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 30/11/09 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 1/10/09 Wed 19/8/09 Thu 10/9/09 Wed 30/9/09 Thu 1/10/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 30/11/09 Sun 27/11/11 Sun 27/11/11 Fri 21/8/09 Wed 1/7/09 Fri 10/7/09 Thu 11/6/09 Wed 15/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Fri 21/8/09 Tue 1/12/09 Fri 11/9/09 Wed 14/10/09 Mon 30/11/09 Tue 1/12/09 Sun 27/11/11

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 1

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF OVERLAPPING ACTIVITIES (FINISH TO START BASIS)
ID 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 Task Name Duration Start Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N Wed 16/3/11 EW01 Earthwork Sat 23/1/10 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Thu 15/7/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Sat 31/7/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 28/2/11 Fri 30/4/10 Fri 30/4/10 Sun 31/10/10 Thu 15/7/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Sat 31/7/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 31/3/10 Thu 30/9/10 Mon 13/9/10 Mon 13/9/10 Tue 15/3/11 Fri 31/12/10 Thu 15/7/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 31/3/10 2/1 31/3 31/3 2/1 15/4 15/7 15/7 15/1 31/12 2/1 2/1 31/3 31/3 30/9 13/9 13/9 15/3 15/5 31/7 31/7 31/1 1/4 15/7 15/7 15/1 2/1 30/4 30/4 31/10 15/5 30/8 30/8 28/2 2/1 31/7 31/7 31/1 2/1 2/1 28/2 28/2 15/6 15/7 15/7 15/1 2/1 28/2 28/2 15/6 2/1 2/1 23/1 28/2 28/2 15/6

EW01 Earthwork Mobilization and Site Preparation ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg - (2.0 mths) - TB01A Zone G Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone G Preloading End ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg - (2.0 mths) - TB01B Zone H Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone H Preloading End ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel - (2.0 mths) TB01B Zone G1 Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone G1 Preloading End ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) - (6.5 mths) TB02B Zone F Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F Preloading End ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) - (7.0 mths) TB02B Zone F1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F1 Preloading End ZONE F2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross taxiway ( Left Wing) - (3.5 mths) AF02 Zone F2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F2 Preloading End ZONE E ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) - (4.0 mths) TB02A Zone E Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E Preloading End ZONE E1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) - (3.5 mths) TB02A Zone E1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E1 Preloading End ZONE E2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Taxiway (Right Wing) - (2.5 mths) AF02 Zone E2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E2 Preloading End ZONE J ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Left Wing) - (3.0 mths) AF02 Zone J Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone J Preloading End ZONE K ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (8.5 m Zone K Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone K Preloading End ZONE K1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (12.0 mths) AF02 ZONE D ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area Integrated Complex, Transport Hub, etc - (3.0 m) Zone D Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone D Preloading End ZONE I ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area Approach Road, etc - (3.0 mths)~ AF02,LF05/06 Zone I Preloading Start (6.0 mths)

434 days 22 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 194 days 0 days 0 days 210 days 0 days 0 days 108 days 0 days 0 days 119 days 0 days 0 days 105 days 0 days 0 days 78 days 0 days 0 days 89 days 0 days 0 days 253 days 0 days 0 days 360 days 91 days 0 days 0 days 89 days 0 days

Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 28/2/10 Tue 15/6/10 Sat 2/1/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Sat 15/5/10 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 28/2/11 Sat 2/1/10 Fri 30/4/10 Sun 31/10/10 Thu 1/4/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 31/3/10 Thu 30/9/10 Sat 2/1/10 Mon 13/9/10 Tue 15/3/11 Sat 2/1/10 Thu 15/4/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sat 15/1/11 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 31/3/10

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 2

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF OVERLAPPING ACTIVITIES (FINISH TO START BASIS)
ID 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 Task Name Zone I Preloading End ZONE I1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Parking Apron - (7.0 mths) ~ TB02A & TB02B Zone I1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I1 Preloading End ZONE I2 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - etc (4.5 mths) ~ AF02 Zone I2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I2 Preloading End ZONE E3A ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (2.0 mths) AF02 Zone E3A Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3A Preloading End EW01 Relocation Area UT 03A Relocation of Services(Conventional) UT 03A Design Stage Design Works UT 03A Procurement Appointment of Contractor UT 03A Construction + Remaining Earthworks Relocation of Security Service Road & Fence - adjacent to Rwy New Pump Station & Associated Works (7.5 mths) Relocation of Services + Lay New Pipe (adjacent to Rwy2 area)-Area E3 & L 5.5 mths New Pump Station A Substation & Associated Works (7.0 mths) ICT Relocation Works (3.5 mths) ZONE E3B ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Adjacent to Rwy2 -Area E3B Zone E3B Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3B Preloading End ZONE E3 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area - (2.0 mths) Zone E3 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3 Preloading End ZONE L1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area - (2.0 mths) - Without ZONE L ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area - (2.0 mths) Zone L Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone L Preloading End EW 01A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain at Cogen and ACTL - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 01A Procurement Appointment of Contractor EW 01A Construction Mobilization, Site Preparation & Soil Investigation Zone A (Hotel) Construction (5 months) Zone A Preloading Start (4 months) Zone A Preloading End Zone A1 (ACTL-West Tower) Construction (3.0 month) Zone A1 Preloading Start (4 months) Duration 0 days 210 days 0 days 0 days 137 days 0 days 0 days 61 days 0 days 0 days 688 days 688 days 58 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 558 days 171 days 223 days 193 days 208 days 105 days 59 days 0 days 0 days 75 days 0 days 0 days 59 days 75 days 0 days 0 days 289 days 0 days 0 days 289 days 14 days 158 days 0 days 0 days 97 days 0 days Start Thu 30/9/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Sun 2/5/10 Thu 16/9/10 Wed 16/3/11 Thu 1/7/10 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 28/2/11 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 12/5/10 Thu 13/5/10 Thu 13/5/10 Sun 1/8/10 Wed 1/9/10 Sun 1/8/10 Sat 16/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Fri 31/12/10 Thu 30/6/11 Wed 16/3/11 Mon 30/5/11 Sun 27/11/11 Mon 1/11/10 Wed 16/3/11 Mon 30/5/11 Sun 27/11/11 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 29/5/10 Wed 3/11/10 Thu 3/3/11 Thu 29/7/10 Wed 3/11/10 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N Thu 30/9/10 30/9 Sat 31/7/10 Sat 31/7/10 Mon 31/1/11 Thu 16/9/10 Thu 16/9/10 Wed 16/3/11 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 30/8/10 Mon 28/2/11 Sun 27/11/11 Sun 27/11/11 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 12/5/10 Sun 27/11/11 Sun 31/10/10 Tue 15/3/11 Tue 15/3/11 Mon 28/2/11 Mon 31/1/11 Fri 31/12/10 Fri 31/12/10 Thu 30/6/11 Mon 30/5/11 Mon 30/5/11 Sun 27/11/11 Fri 31/12/10 Mon 30/5/11 Mon 30/5/11 Sun 27/11/11 Thu 3/3/11 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Thu 3/3/11 Fri 28/5/10 Wed 3/11/10 Wed 3/11/10 Thu 3/3/11 Wed 3/11/10 Wed 3/11/10 29/7 3/11 3/11 15/5 29/5 28/5 3/11 3/11 3/3 14/5 14/5 EW 01A Construction 1/11 31/12 16/3 30/5 30/5 27/11 EW 01A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain at Cogen and ACTL - RWY3 (Conventional) 16/3 30/5 30/5 27/11 1/8 16/10 1/11 13/5 1/8 1/9 31/10 15/3 15/3 28/2 31/1 31/12 31/12 30/6 2/1 UT 03A Design Stage 28/2 12/5 12/5 UT 03A Construction + Remaining Earthworks 1/7 30/8 30/8 28/2 EW01 Relocation Area UT 03A Relocation of Services(Conventional) 2/5 16/9 16/9 16/3 2/1 31/7 31/7 31/1

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 3

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF OVERLAPPING ACTIVITIES (FINISH TO START BASIS)
ID 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 Task Name Zone A1 Preloading End Zone B (Car Park) Construction (4 months) Zone B Preloading Start (4 months) Zone B Preloading End Zone C (District Cooling Plant & Sub-station) Construction (3 months) Zone C Preloading Start (4 months) Zone C Preloading End EW 02A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 02A Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Survey Data Verification & Confirmation Appointment of Soil Investigation (S.I.) Contractor Soil Investigation Works S.I Result & Prepare Report Design Works EW 02A Procurement (Area 1) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 1) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 9.5 months) Area 1 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 1 Preloading End EW 02A Procurement (Area 2) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 2) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 1.5 months) Area 2 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 2 Preloading End EW 02A Procurement (Area 3) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 3) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 1.5 months) Area 3 Preloading Start (6 mths) Duration 0 days 127 days 0 days 0 days 96 days 0 days 0 days 793 days 87 days 0 days 9 days 0 days 29 days 23 days 32 days 99 days 23 days 24 days 49 days 0 days 539 days 19 days 345 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 40 days 21 days 40 days 0 days 294 days 7 days 105 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 40 days 21 days 40 days 0 days 294 days 7 days 105 days 0 days Start Thu 3/3/11 Tue 29/6/10 Wed 3/11/10 Thu 3/3/11 Tue 29/6/10 Sun 3/10/10 Wed 2/2/11 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Mon 3/8/09 Mon 24/8/09 Thu 17/9/09 Wed 21/10/09 Wed 21/10/09 Fri 13/11/09 Tue 8/12/09 Mon 1/2/10 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 16/2/10 Mon 31/1/11 Sun 31/7/11 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Mon 11/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 22/12/10 Thu 7/4/11 Sat 8/10/11 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Mon 11/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 22/12/10 Thu 7/4/11 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N Thu 3/3/11 3/3 29/6 3/11 3/11 3/3 29/6 3/10 3/10 2/2 EW 02A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 02A Design Stage 22/7 23/7 31/7 31/7 3/8 24/8 17/9 1/9 16/9 20/10 EW 02A Procurement (Area 1) 21/10 13/11 8/12 12/11 7/12 29/1 1/2 EW 02A Construction (Area 1) 2/2 16/2 20/2 31/1 31/1 31/7 EW 02A Procurement (Area 2) 1/9 11/10 1/11 10/10 31/10 10/12 14/12 EW 02A Construction (Area 2) 15/12 22/12 21/12 7/4 7/4 8/10 EW 02A Procurement (Area 3) 1/9 11/10 1/11 10/10 31/10 10/12 14/12 EW 02A Construction (Area 3) 15/12 22/12 21/12 7/4 7/4

Wed 3/11/10 Wed 3/11/10 Thu 3/3/11 Sun 3/10/10 Sun 3/10/10 Wed 2/2/11 Sat 8/10/11 Tue 20/10/09 Wed 22/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Tue 1/9/09 Wed 16/9/09 Tue 20/10/09 Mon 1/2/10 Thu 12/11/09 Mon 7/12/09 Fri 29/1/10 Mon 1/2/10 Sun 31/7/11 Sat 20/2/10 Mon 31/1/11 Mon 31/1/11 Sun 31/7/11 Tue 14/12/10 Sun 10/10/10 Sun 31/10/10 Fri 10/12/10 Tue 14/12/10 Sat 8/10/11 Tue 21/12/10 Thu 7/4/11 Thu 7/4/11 Sat 8/10/11 Tue 14/12/10 Sun 10/10/10 Sun 31/10/10 Fri 10/12/10 Tue 14/12/10 Sat 8/10/11 Tue 21/12/10 Thu 7/4/11 Thu 7/4/11

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 4

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF OVERLAPPING ACTIVITIES (FINISH TO START BASIS)
ID 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 Task Name Area 3 Preloading End AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (Conventional) AF 01 Design Stage Appoinment of Design Consultant Design Works AF 01 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor AF 01 Construction Mobilization Received Access 1.3KM from EW02A Firtst 1.3 km Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (4.0 months) Remaining area of Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (4.0 months) AF 02 Cross Taxiway Between RWY2 & RWY3 (Conventional) AF 02 Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Design Works AF 02 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor AF 02 Construction Mobilization Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE K (1.0 month) Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE E2 (1.5 month) Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE I2 (4.0 months) Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE F2 (1.5 month) At Relocation area Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3B & L1 (4 months) Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3 & L (3 months) Duration 0 days 1033 days 1033 days 216 days 0 days 124 days 149 days 57 days 45 days 46 days 0 days 268 days 30 days 0 days 120 days 118 days 906 days 336 days 0 days 116 days 120 days 31 days 45 days 44 days 0 days 375 days 30 days 31 days 45 days 120 days 46 days 240 days 122 days 91 days Start Sat 8/10/11 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Mon 23/11/09 Mon 28/3/11 Mon 28/3/11 Wed 25/5/11 Sat 9/7/11 Wed 24/8/11 Sun 9/10/11 Sun 9/10/11 Mon 7/11/11 Tue 8/11/11 Sat 10/3/12 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Mon 5/4/10 Fri 15/10/10 Fri 15/10/10 Mon 15/11/10 Sun 2/1/11 Mon 14/2/11 Tue 15/2/11 Tue 15/2/11 Wed 16/3/11 Sat 16/4/11 Thu 17/3/11 Wed 1/6/11 Fri 1/7/11 Fri 1/7/11 Mon 28/11/11 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N Sat 8/10/11 8/10 Fri 6/7/12 Fri 6/7/12 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 24/8/11 Tue 24/5/11 Fri 8/7/11 Tue 23/8/11 Wed 24/8/11 Fri 6/7/12 Mon 7/11/11 Mon 7/11/11 Fri 9/3/12 Fri 6/7/12 Wed 29/2/12 Fri 30/7/10 Wed 19/8/09 Fri 30/7/10 Mon 14/2/11 Sun 14/11/10 Fri 31/12/10 Mon 14/2/11 Mon 14/2/11 Wed 29/2/12 Wed 16/3/11 Fri 15/4/11 Tue 31/5/11 Fri 15/7/11 Sat 16/7/11 Wed 29/2/12 Mon 31/10/11 Wed 29/2/12 1/7 31/10 28/11 29/2 15/2 16/3 16/4 17/3 1/6 16/3 15/4 31/5 15/7 16/7 At Relocation area 15/10 15/11 2/1 14/11 31/12 14/2 14/2 AF 02 Construction 19/8 5/4 30/7 AF 02 Procurement AF 02 Design Stage 8/11 10/3 9/10 7/11 7/11 9/3 6/7 AF 02 Cross Taxiway Between RWY2 & RWY3 (Conventio 28/3 25/5 9/7 24/5 8/7 23/8 24/8 AF 01 Construction 19/8 23/11 31/3 AF 01 Procurement AF 01 Design Stage AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (Conventi

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 5

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE (WITHOUT ELEMENT OF SCHEDULE COMPRESSION)

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF SCHEDULE COMPRESSION (ADDITIONAL WORKING HOURS)
ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Task Name PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG Appointment of KLIACS as PMC INCEPTION AND INITIATION Appointment of Air Space Consultant Airport Planner / Drainage Planner On Board Master Plan Requirement's Capture Airport Planning, Land Use and Design Brief Program of Requirement (POR) AIRPORT PLANNING Airport Planner Conceptual Design Concept Design Verification and Approval Development Order Application and Submission EIA Consultant Appointment EIA Study and Report Preparation (14 Weeks) EIA Approval D.O Approval Special Approval for Earth Work Commencement SITE PREPARATION EN 01 Enabling Work (Conventional) EN 01 Design Stage Appointment of Consultant Design Works EN 01 Procurement Process Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EN 01 Construction Site Clearing & Access for Site EARTHWORK EW 01 Site Preparation, Earthwork & Main Drain (Conventional) EW 01 Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Survey Data Verification & Confirmation Appointment of Soil Investigation (S.I.) Contractor Soil Investigation Works S.I Result & Prepare Report Design Works EW 01 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) Duration 1181 days 0 days 92 days 0 days 0 days 28 days 42 days 18 days 228 days 93 days 14 days 128 days 0 days 142 days 59 days 14 days 0 days 184 days 184 days 28 days 0 days 28 days 68 days 28 days 21 days 18 days 0 days 88 days 88 days 1019 days 1019 days 72 days 0 days 9 days 0 days 35 days 21 days 30 days 96 days 18 days 29 days 46 days 0 days 822 days Start Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Fri 3/7/09 Fri 14/8/09 Thu 25/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Tue 29/9/09 Tue 18/8/09 Tue 7/7/09 Wed 8/7/09 Tue 1/12/09 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 1/12/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Thu 23/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Thu 20/8/09 Fri 11/9/09 Thu 1/10/09 Fri 2/10/09 Fri 2/10/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Wed 1/7/09 Thu 2/7/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 2/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Mon 24/8/09 Mon 24/8/09 Mon 14/9/09 Thu 15/10/09 Tue 1/12/09 Sat 2/1/10 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Thu 13/9/12 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCC Mon 1/6/09 Tue 1/9/09 Mon 1/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 13/8/09 Tue 1/9/09 Mon 15/2/10 Mon 28/9/09 Mon 12/10/09 Wed 30/12/09 Tue 7/7/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 1/2/10 Mon 15/2/10 Tue 1/12/09 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 1/10/09 Wed 19/8/09 Thu 10/9/09 Wed 30/9/09 Thu 1/10/09 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Thu 12/4/12 Thu 12/4/12 Fri 21/8/09 Wed 1/7/09 Fri 10/7/09 Thu 11/6/09 Wed 15/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Fri 21/8/09 Tue 1/12/09 Fri 11/9/09 Wed 14/10/09 Mon 30/11/09 Tue 1/12/09 Thu 12/4/12 24/8 14/9 15/10 11/9 14/10 30/11 1/12 EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) 11/6 2/7 23/7 2/7 1/7 10/7 11/6 15/7 22/7 21/8 EW 01 Procurement EW 01 Design Stage 2/10 23/7 20/8 11/9 19/8 10/9 30/9 1/10 EN 01 Construction 2/1 EARTHWORK EW 01 Site Preparation, Earthwork & Main Drain (Conventi 25/6 8/7 1/12 2/2 1/12 SITE PREPARATION EN 01 Enabling Work (Conventional) EN 01 Design Stage 24/6 22/7 EN 01 Procurement Process 18/8 7/7 30/11 1/2 15/2 25/6 29/9 28/9 12/10 30/12 25/6 3/7 14/8 1/6 24/6 22/7 13/8 1/9 AIRPORT PLANNING 1/6 INCEPTION AND INITIATION

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 1

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF SCHEDULE COMPRESSION (ADDITIONAL WORKING HOURS)
ID 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 Task Name EW01 Earthwork Mobilization and Site Preparation ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg - (2.0 mths) - TB01A Zone G Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone G Preloading End ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg - (2.0 mths) - TB01B Zone H Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone H Preloading End ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel - (2.0 mths) TB01B Zone G1 Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone G1 Preloading End ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) - (6.5 mths) TB02B Zone F Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F Preloading End ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) - (7.0 mths) TB02B Zone F1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F1 Preloading End ZONE F2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross taxiway ( Left Wing) - (3.5 mths) AF02 Zone F2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F2 Preloading End ZONE E ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) - (4.0 mths) TB02A Zone E Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E Preloading End ZONE E1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) - (3.5 mths) TB02A Zone E1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E1 Preloading End ZONE E2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Taxiway (Right Wing) - (2.5 mths) AF02 Zone E2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E2 Preloading End ZONE J ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Left Wing) - (3.0 mths) AF02 Zone J Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone J Preloading End ZONE K ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (8.5 mths) AF02 Zone K Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone K Preloading End ZONE K1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (12.0 mths) AF02 ZONE D ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - Integrated Complex, Transport Hub, etc - (3.0 m) Zone D Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone D Preloading End ZONE I ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area Approach Road, etc - (3.0 mths)~ AF02,LF05/06 Zone I Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Duration 559 days 33 days 87 days 0 days 0 days 87 days 0 days 0 days 87 days 0 days 0 days 291 days 0 days 0 days 315 days 0 days 0 days 162 days 0 days 0 days 179 days 0 days 0 days 158 days 0 days 0 days 117 days 0 days 0 days 133 days 0 days 0 days 379 days 0 days 0 days 540 days 137 days 0 days 0 days 133 days 0 days Start Sun 3/1/10 Sun 3/1/10 Sun 3/1/10 Tue 30/3/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sun 3/1/10 Tue 30/3/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sun 3/1/10 Tue 30/3/10 Thu 15/7/10 Sun 3/1/10 Fri 22/10/10 Sat 23/4/11 Sun 3/1/10 Mon 15/11/10 Wed 18/5/11 Sun 16/5/10 Mon 25/10/10 Sun 24/4/11 Sun 3/1/10 Thu 1/7/10 Mon 3/1/11 Fri 2/4/10 Wed 8/9/10 Thu 10/3/11 Sun 16/5/10 Fri 10/9/10 Sat 12/3/11 Sun 3/1/10 Sun 16/5/10 Sun 14/11/10 Sun 3/1/10 Fri 21/1/11 Thu 21/7/11 Sun 3/1/10 Fri 16/4/10 Wed 1/9/10 Thu 3/3/11 Sun 3/1/10 Sun 16/5/10 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Thu 21/7/11 EW01 Earthwork Thu 4/2/10 Tue 30/3/10 Tue 30/3/10 Thu 15/7/10 Tue 30/3/10 Tue 30/3/10 Thu 15/7/10 Tue 30/3/10 Tue 30/3/10 Thu 15/7/10 Fri 22/10/10 Fri 22/10/10 Sat 23/4/11 Mon 15/11/10 Mon 15/11/10 Wed 18/5/11 Mon 25/10/10 Mon 25/10/10 Sun 24/4/11 Thu 1/7/10 Thu 1/7/10 Mon 3/1/11 Wed 8/9/10 Wed 8/9/10 Thu 10/3/11 Fri 10/9/10 Fri 10/9/10 Sat 12/3/11 Sun 16/5/10 Sun 16/5/10 Sun 14/11/10 Fri 21/1/11 Fri 21/1/11 Thu 21/7/11 Sat 2/7/11 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Thu 3/3/11 Sun 16/5/10 Sun 16/5/10 3/1 16/5 16/5 3/1 16/4 1/9 1/9 3/3 2/7 3/1 3/1 16/5 16/5 14/11 21/1 21/1 21/7 16/5 10/9 10/9 12/3 2/4 8/9 8/9 10/3 3/1 1/7 1/7 3/1 16/5 25/10 25/10 24/4 3/1 15/11 15/11 18/5 3/1 3/1 30/3 30/3 15/7 22/10 22/10 23/4 3/1 30/3 30/3 15/7 3/1 3/1 4/2 30/3 30/3 15/7

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 2

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF SCHEDULE COMPRESSION (ADDITIONAL WORKING HOURS)
ID 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 Task Name Zone I Preloading End ZONE I1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Parking Apron - (7.0 mths) ~ TB02A & TB02B Zone I1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I1 Preloading End ZONE I2 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - etc - (4.5 mths) ~ AF02 Zone I2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I2 Preloading End ZONE E3A ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (2.0 mths) AF02 Zone E3A Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3A Preloading End EW01 Relocation Area UT 03A Relocation of Services(Conventional) UT 03A Design Stage Design Works UT 03A Procurement Appointment of Contractor UT 03A Construction + Remaining Earthworks Relocation of Security Service Road & Fence adjacent to Rwy2 area (Area E3B & L1 5.5 mths) New Pump Station & Associated Works (7.5 mths) Relocation of Services + Lay New Pipe (adjacent to Rwy2 area)-Area E3 & L 5.5 mths New Pump Station A Substation & Associated Works ICT Relocation Works (3.5 mths) ZONE E3B ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Adjacent to Rwy2 Zone E3B Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3B Preloading End ZONE E3 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area Zone E3 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3 Preloading End ZONE L1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area ZONE L ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation area Zone L Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone L Preloading End EW 01A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain at Cogen and ACTL - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 01A Procurement Appointment of Contractor EW 01A Construction Mobilization, Site Preparation & Soil Investigation Zone A (Hotel) Construction (5 months) Zone A Preloading Start (4 months) Zone A Preloading End Zone A1 (ACTL-West Tower) Construction (3.0 month) Zone A1 Preloading Start (4 months) Duration 0 days 315 days 0 days 0 days 206 days 0 days 0 days 91 days 0 days 0 days 822 days 822 days 58 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 692 days 257 days 334 days 290 days 312 days 157 days 89 days 0 days 0 days 112 days 0 days 0 days 88 days 112 days 0 days 0 days 375 days 0 days 0 days 375 days 21 days 237 days 0 days 0 days 145 days 0 days Start Sun 14/11/10 Sun 3/1/10 Mon 15/11/10 Wed 18/5/11 Mon 3/5/10 Thu 25/11/10 Thu 26/5/11 Fri 2/7/10 Fri 1/10/10 Thu 31/3/11 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 12/5/10 Thu 13/5/10 Thu 13/5/10 Sun 1/8/10 Wed 1/9/10 Sun 1/8/10 Sat 16/10/10 Sat 29/1/11 Wed 27/4/11 Tue 25/10/11 Wed 22/6/11 Wed 12/10/11 Thu 12/4/12 Sat 29/1/11 Wed 22/6/11 Wed 12/10/11 Thu 12/4/12 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 5/6/10 Mon 31/1/11 Sun 29/5/11 Thu 5/8/10 Thu 30/12/10 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Sun 14/11/10 14/11 3/1 15/11 15/11 18/5 3/5 25/11 25/11 26/5 2/7 1/10 1/10 31/3 EW01 Relocation Area UT 03A Relocation of Services(Conventional) UT 03A Design Stage 2/1 28/2 12/5 12/5 UT 03A Construction + Remaining Earthworks 13/5 1/8 1/9 1/8 16/10 29/1 24/3 27/4 27/4 25/10 22/6 12/10 12/10 12/4 29/1 26/4 22/6 12/10 12/10 12/4 EW 01A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain at Cogen and ACTL - RWY3 (Conventional) 14/5 14/5 EW 01A Construction 15/5 5/6 4/6 31/1 31/1 29/5 5/8 30/12 30/12 28/1 5/7 21/6 13/6

Mon 15/11/10 Mon 15/11/10 Wed 18/5/11 Thu 25/11/10 Thu 25/11/10 Thu 26/5/11 Fri 1/10/10 Fri 1/10/10 Thu 31/3/11 Thu 12/4/12 Thu 12/4/12 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 12/5/10 Thu 12/4/12 Fri 28/1/11 Tue 5/7/11 Tue 21/6/11 Mon 13/6/11 Thu 24/3/11 Wed 27/4/11 Wed 27/4/11 Tue 25/10/11 Wed 12/10/11 Wed 12/10/11 Thu 12/4/12 Tue 26/4/11 Wed 12/10/11 Wed 12/10/11 Thu 12/4/12 Sun 29/5/11 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Sun 29/5/11 Fri 4/6/10 Mon 31/1/11 Mon 31/1/11 Sun 29/5/11 Thu 30/12/10 Thu 30/12/10

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 3

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF SCHEDULE COMPRESSION (ADDITIONAL WORKING HOURS)
ID 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 Task Name Zone A1 Preloading End Zone B (Car Park) Construction (4 months) Zone B Preloading Start (4 months) Zone B Preloading End Zone C (District Cooling Plant & Sub-station) Construction (3 month Zone C Preloading Start (4 months) Zone C Preloading End EW 02A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 02A Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Survey Data Verification & Confirmation Appointment of Soil Investigation (S.I.) Contractor Soil Investigation Works S.I Result & Prepare Report Design Works EW 02A Procurement (Area 1) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 1) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 9.5 months) Area 1 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 1 Preloading End EW 02A Procurement (Area 2) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 2) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 1.5 months) Area 2 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 2 Preloading End EW 02A Procurement (Area 3) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 3) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 1.5 months) Area 3 Preloading Start (6 mths) Duration 0 days 191 days 0 days 0 days 144 days 0 days 0 days 898 days 87 days 0 days 9 days 0 days 29 days 23 days 32 days 99 days 23 days 24 days 49 days 0 days 712 days 28 days 518 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 40 days 21 days 40 days 0 days 350 days 10 days 158 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 40 days 21 days 40 days 0 days 350 days 10 days 158 days 0 days Start Wed 27/4/11 Tue 6/7/10 Sun 16/1/11 Sat 14/5/11 Tue 6/7/10 Sat 27/11/10 Tue 29/3/11 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Mon 3/8/09 Mon 24/8/09 Thu 17/9/09 Wed 21/10/09 Wed 21/10/09 Fri 13/11/09 Tue 8/12/09 Mon 1/2/10 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 16/2/10 Sun 24/7/11 Tue 24/1/12 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Mon 11/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Sun 26/12/10 Fri 3/6/11 Sat 3/12/11 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Mon 11/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Sun 26/12/10 Fri 3/6/11 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Wed 27/4/11 27/4 Sun 16/1/11 Sun 16/1/11 Sat 14/5/11 Sat 27/11/10 Sat 27/11/10 Tue 29/3/11 Tue 24/1/12 Tue 20/10/09 Wed 22/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Tue 1/9/09 Wed 16/9/09 Tue 20/10/09 Mon 1/2/10 Thu 12/11/09 Mon 7/12/09 Fri 29/1/10 Mon 1/2/10 Tue 24/1/12 Mon 1/3/10 Sun 24/7/11 Sun 24/7/11 Tue 24/1/12 Tue 14/12/10 Sun 10/10/10 Sun 31/10/10 Fri 10/12/10 Tue 14/12/10 Sat 3/12/11 Fri 24/12/10 Fri 3/6/11 Fri 3/6/11 Sat 3/12/11 Tue 14/12/10 Sun 10/10/10 Sun 31/10/10 Fri 10/12/10 Tue 14/12/10 Sat 3/12/11 Fri 24/12/10 Fri 3/6/11 Fri 3/6/11 15/12 26/12 24/12 3/6 3/6 1/9 11/10 1/11 10/10 31/10 10/12 14/12 EW 02A Construction (Area 3) EW 02A Procurement (Area 3) 15/12 26/12 24/12 3/6 3/6 3/12 1/9 11/10 1/11 10/10 31/10 10/12 14/12 EW 02A Construction (Area 2) EW 02A Procurement (Area 2) 2/2 16/2 1/3 24/7 24/7 24/1 21/10 13/11 8/12 12/11 7/12 29/1 1/2 EW 02A Construction (Area 1) 3/8 24/8 17/9 23/7 22/7 31/7 31/7 1/9 16/9 20/10 EW 02A Procurement (Area 1) EW 02A Design Stage 6/7 27/11 27/11 29/3 EW 02A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain - RWY3 (Conventional) 6/7 16/1 16/1 14/5

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 4

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF SCHEDULE COMPRESSION (ADDITIONAL WORKING HOURS)
ID 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 Task Name Area 3 Preloading End AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (Conventional) AF 01 Design Stage Appoinment of Design Consultant Design Works AF 01 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor AF 01 Construction Mobilization Received Access 1.3KM from EW02A Firtst 1.3 km Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (4.0 months) Remaining area of Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (4.0 months) AF 02 Cross Taxiway Between RWY2 & RWY3 (Conventional) AF 02 Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Design Works AF 02 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor AF 02 Construction Mobilization Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE K (1.0 month) Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE E2 (1.5 month) Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE I2 (4.0 months) Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE F2 (1.5 month) At Relocation area Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3B & L1 (4 months) Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3 & L (3 months) Duration 0 days 1101 days 1051 days 216 days 0 days 124 days 149 days 57 days 45 days 46 days 0 days 275 days 45 days 0 days 180 days 177 days 1101 days 336 days 0 days 116 days 120 days 31 days 45 days 44 days 0 days 510 days 45 days 46 days 68 days 180 days 69 days 319 days 183 days 136 days Start Sat 3/12/11 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Mon 23/11/09 Mon 23/5/11 Mon 23/5/11 Tue 19/7/11 Sat 3/9/11 Wed 19/10/11 Thu 20/10/11 Thu 20/10/11 Wed 25/1/12 Thu 26/1/12 Sun 4/12/11 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Mon 5/4/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Mon 17/1/11 Thu 3/3/11 Fri 15/4/11 Sat 16/4/11 Sat 16/4/11 Tue 29/11/11 Tue 17/1/12 Wed 1/6/11 Sun 25/3/12 Wed 26/10/11 Wed 26/10/11 Sun 29/4/12 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quart A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Sat 3/12/11 3/12 AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (Convention AF 01 Design Stage 19/8 23/11 31/3 AF 01 Procurement 23/5 19/7 3/9 18/7 2/9 18/10 19/10 AF 01 Construction 20/10 3/12 25/1 26/1 4/12 1/6 AF 02 Cross Taxiway Between RWY2 & RW AF 02 Design Stage 19/8 5/4 30/7 AF 02 Procurement 15/12 17/1 3/3 16/1 2/3 15/4 15/4 AF 02 Construction 16/4 31/5 29/11 17/1 1/6 28/11 25/3 2/6 At Relocation area 26/10 29/4 28/4 13/9 16/1 24/3 24/7

Thu 13/9/12 Tue 24/7/12 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 19/10/11 Mon 18/7/11 Fri 2/9/11 Tue 18/10/11 Wed 19/10/11 Tue 24/7/12 Sat 3/12/11 Wed 25/1/12 Tue 24/7/12 Fri 1/6/12 Thu 13/9/12 Fri 30/7/10 Wed 19/8/09 Fri 30/7/10 Fri 15/4/11 Sun 16/1/11 Wed 2/3/11 Fri 15/4/11 Fri 15/4/11 Thu 13/9/12 Tue 31/5/11 Mon 16/1/12 Sat 24/3/12 Mon 28/11/11 Sat 2/6/12 Thu 13/9/12 Sat 28/4/12 Thu 13/9/12

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 5

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE (WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY: HIDPR COMPACTOR)

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY: HIDPR COMPACTOR
ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Task Name PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT AT KLIA SEPANG Appointment of KLIACS as PMC INCEPTION AND INITIATION Appointment of Air Space Consultant Airport Planner / Drainage Planner On Board Master Plan Requirement's Capture Airport Planning, Land Use and Design Brief Program of Requirement (POR) AIRPORT PLANNING Airport Planner Conceptual Design Concept Design Verification and Approval Development Order Application and Submission EIA Consultant Appointment EIA Study and Report Preparation (14 Weeks) EIA Approval D.O Approval Special Approval for Earth Work Commencement SITE PREPARATION EN 01 Enabling Work (Conventional) EN 01 Design Stage Appointment of Consultant Design Works EN 01 Procurement Process Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EN 01 Construction Site Clearing & Access for Site EARTHWORK EW 01 Site Preparation, Earthwork & Main Drain (Conventional) EW 01 Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Survey Data Verification & Confirmation Appointment of Soil Investigation (S.I.) Contractor Soil Investigation Works S.I Result & Prepare Report Design Works EW 01 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor Duration 1204 days 0 days 92 days 0 days 0 days 28 days 42 days 18 days 228 days 93 days 14 days 128 days 0 days 142 days 59 days 14 days 0 days 155 days 155 days 28 days 0 days 28 days 68 days 28 days 21 days 18 days 0 days 59 days 59 days 1043 days 945 days 72 days 0 days 9 days 0 days 35 days 21 days 30 days 96 days 18 days 29 days 46 days 0 days Start Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Mon 1/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Fri 3/7/09 Fri 14/8/09 Thu 25/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Tue 29/9/09 Tue 18/8/09 Tue 7/7/09 Wed 8/7/09 Tue 1/12/09 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 1/12/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Thu 25/6/09 Thu 23/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Thu 20/8/09 Fri 11/9/09 Thu 1/10/09 Fri 2/10/09 Fri 2/10/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Wed 1/7/09 Thu 2/7/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 11/6/09 Thu 2/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Mon 24/8/09 Mon 24/8/09 Mon 14/9/09 Thu 15/10/09 Tue 1/12/09 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 20 nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quartend Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J Sat 6/10/12 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF NEW LCCT Mon 1/6/09 Tue 1/9/09 Mon 1/6/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 13/8/09 Tue 1/9/09 Mon 15/2/10 Mon 28/9/09 Mon 12/10/09 Wed 30/12/09 Tue 7/7/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 1/2/10 Mon 15/2/10 Tue 1/12/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 30/11/09 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 24/6/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 1/10/09 Wed 19/8/09 Thu 10/9/09 Wed 30/9/09 Thu 1/10/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 30/11/09 Mon 7/5/12 Sun 29/1/12 Fri 21/8/09 Wed 1/7/09 Fri 10/7/09 Thu 11/6/09 Wed 15/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Fri 21/8/09 Tue 1/12/09 Fri 11/9/09 Wed 14/10/09 Mon 30/11/09 Tue 1/12/09 24/8 14/9 15/10 11/9 14/10 30/11 1/12 11/6 2/7 23/7 2/7 1/7 10/7 11/6 15/7 22/7 21/8 EW 01 Procurement EW 01 Design Stage 2/10 23/7 20/8 11/9 19/8 10/9 30/9 1/10 EN 01 Construction 30/11 EARTHWORK EW 01 Site Preparation, Earthwork & Main Drain (Conventional) 25/6 8/7 1/12 2/2 1/12 SITE PREPARATION EN 01 Enabling Work (Conventional) EN 01 Design Stage 24/6 22/7 EN 01 Procurement Process 18/8 7/7 30/11 1/2 15/2 25/6 29/9 28/9 12/10 30/12 25/6 3/7 14/8 1/6 24/6 22/7 13/8 1/9 AIRPORT PLANNING 1/6 INCEPTION AND INITIATION

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 1

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY: HIDPR COMPACTOR
ID 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 Task Name EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork Mobilization and Site Preparation ZONE G ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for MTB Bldg - (2.0 mths) - TB01A Zone G Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone G Preloading End ZONE H ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Satellite Bldg - (2.0 mths) - TB01B Zone H Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone H Preloading End ZONE G1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for BHS Tunnel - (2.0 mths) TB01B Zone G1 Preloading Start (4.0 mths) Zone G1 Preloading End ZONE F ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) - (6.5 mths) TB02B Zone F Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F Preloading End ZONE F1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron ( Left Wing) - (7.0 mths) TB02B Zone F1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F1 Preloading End ZONE F2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross taxiway ( Left Wing) - (3.5 mths) AF02 Zone F2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone F2 Preloading End ZONE E ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) - (4.0 mths) TB02A Zone E Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E Preloading End ZONE E1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Parking Apron (Right Wing) - (3.5 mths) Zone E1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E1 Preloading End ZONE E2 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Taxiway (Right Wing) - (2.5 mths) AF02 Zone E2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E2 Preloading End ZONE J ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Left Wing) - (3.0 mths) AF02 Zone J Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone J Preloading End ZONE K ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (8.5 mths) AF02 Zone K Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone K Preloading End ZONE K1 ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (12.0 mths) AF02 ZONE D ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - Integrated Complex, Transport Hub, etc Zone D Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone D Preloading End ZONE I ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - Approach Road, etc - (3.0 mths)~ Task Critical Task Progress Milestone Duration 748 days 648 days 22 days 104 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 0 days 0 days 349 days 0 days 0 days 378 days 0 days 0 days 194 days 0 days 0 days 214 days 0 days 0 days 189 days 0 days 0 days 140 days 0 days 0 days 160 days 0 days 0 days 455 days 0 days 0 days 648 days 164 days 0 days 0 days 160 days Start Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Thu 15/4/10 Sat 31/7/10 Sat 2/1/10 Thu 15/4/10 Sat 31/7/10 Sat 2/1/10 Thu 15/4/10 Sat 31/7/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sun 19/12/10 Mon 20/6/11 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 19/1/11 Tue 19/7/11 Sat 15/5/10 Thu 25/11/10 Thu 26/5/11 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 4/8/10 Sun 6/2/11 Thu 1/4/10 Fri 8/10/10 Sat 9/4/11 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 2/10/10 Sun 3/4/11 Sat 2/1/10 Fri 11/6/10 Fri 10/12/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 6/4/11 Wed 5/10/11 Sat 2/1/10 Thu 15/4/10 Mon 27/9/10 Tue 29/3/11 Sat 2/1/10 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 20 nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quartend Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J Sun 29/1/12 EW 01 Construction (Including Relocation Works) EW01 Earthwork 2/1 2/1 23/1 15/4 15/4 31/7 2/1 15/4 15/4 31/7 2/1 15/4 15/4 31/7 2/1 19/12 19/12 20/6 2/1 19/1 19/1 19/7 15/5 25/11 25/11 26/5 2/1 4/8 4/8 6/2 1/4 8/10 8/10 9/4 15/5 2/10 2/10 3/4 2/1 11/6 11/6 10/12 2/1 6/4 6/4 5/10 2/1 15/4 27/9 27/9 29/3 2/1 External Tasks External Milestone Page 2 11/6 Deadline 18/10

Tue 18/10/11 Sat 23/1/10 Thu 15/4/10 Thu 15/4/10 Sat 31/7/10 Thu 15/4/10 Thu 15/4/10 Sat 31/7/10 Thu 15/4/10 Thu 15/4/10 Sat 31/7/10 Sun 19/12/10 Sun 19/12/10 Mon 20/6/11 Wed 19/1/11 Wed 19/1/11 Tue 19/7/11 Thu 25/11/10 Thu 25/11/10 Thu 26/5/11 Wed 4/8/10 Wed 4/8/10 Sun 6/2/11 Fri 8/10/10 Fri 8/10/10 Sat 9/4/11 Sat 2/10/10 Sat 2/10/10 Sun 3/4/11 Fri 11/6/10 Fri 11/6/10 Fri 10/12/10 Wed 6/4/11 Wed 6/4/11 Wed 5/10/11 Tue 18/10/11 Mon 27/9/10 Mon 27/9/10 Tue 29/3/11 Fri 11/6/10

Summary Project Summary

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY: HIDPR COMPACTOR
ID 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 Task Name Zone I Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I Preloading End ZONE I1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Parking Apron - (7.0 mths) ~ TB02A & TB02B Zone I1 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I1 Preloading End ZONE I2 ~ Ewk & Pform Prep for Landside Area - etc - (4.5 mths) ~ AF02 Zone I2 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone I2 Preloading End ZONE E3A ~ Ewk & Platform Prepn for Cross Twy (Right Wing) - (2.0 mths) AF02 Zone E3A Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3A Preloading End EW01 Relocation Area UT 03A Relocation of Services(Conventional) UT 03A Design Stage Design Works UT 03A Procurement Appointment of Contractor UT 03A Construction + Remaining Earthworks Relocation of Security Service Road & Fence adjacent to Rwy2 area (Area E3B & L1 5.5 New Pump Station & Associated Works (7.5 mth Relocation of Services + Lay New Pipe (adjacent to Rwy2 area)-Area E3 & L 5.5 mths New Pump Station A Substation & Associated W ICT Relocation Works (3.5 mths) ZONE E3B ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Adjacent Zone E3B Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3B Preloading End ZONE E3 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation Zone E3 Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone E3 Preloading End ZONE L1 ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation ZONE L ~ Ewk & Pform Prepn for Part of x-Twy (Right Wing) Relocation Zone L Preloading Start (6.0 mths) Zone L Preloading End EW 01A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain at Cogen and ACTL - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 01A Procurement Appointment of Contractor EW 01A Construction Mobilization, Site Preparation & Soil Investigation Zone A (Hotel) Construction (5 months) Zone A Preloading Start (4 months) Zone A Preloading End Duration 0 days 0 days 378 days 0 days 0 days 247 days 0 days 0 days 110 days 0 days 0 days 748 days 748 days 58 days 58 days 0 days 0 days 618 days 171 days 223 days 193 days 208 days 105 days 106 days 0 days 0 days 135 days 0 days 0 days 106 days 135 days 0 days 0 days 415 days 0 days 0 days 415 days 14 days 284 days 0 days 0 days Start Fri 11/6/10 Fri 10/12/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 19/1/11 Tue 19/7/11 Sun 2/5/10 Fri 7/1/11 Tue 5/7/11 Thu 1/7/10 Tue 19/10/10 Mon 18/4/11 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Sat 2/1/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 12/5/10 Thu 13/5/10 Thu 13/5/10 Sun 1/8/10 Wed 1/9/10 Sun 1/8/10 Sat 16/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Thu 17/2/11 Tue 16/8/11 Wed 16/3/11 Fri 29/7/11 Sun 29/1/12 Mon 1/11/10 Wed 16/3/11 Fri 29/7/11 Sun 29/1/12 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 15/5/10 Sat 29/5/10 Sat 12/3/11 Fri 8/7/11 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 20 nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quartend Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J Fri 11/6/10 11/6 10/12 2/1 19/1 19/1 19/7 2/5 7/1 7/1 5/7 1/7 19/10 19/10 18/4 EW01 Relocation Area UT 03A Relocation of Services(Conventional) UT 03A Design Stage 2/1 28/2 12/5 12/5 UT 03A Construction + Remaining Earthworks 13/5 1/8 1/9 1/8 16/10 1/11 31/10 15/3 15/3 28/2 31/1 17/2 17/2 16/8 16/3 29/7 29/7 29/1 1/11 17/2 16/3 29/7 29/7 29/1 EW 01A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain at Cogen and ACTL - RWY3 (Conventional) 14/5 14/5 EW 01A Construction 15/5 29/5 28/5 12/3 12/3 8/7

Fri 10/12/10 Wed 19/1/11 Wed 19/1/11 Tue 19/7/11 Fri 7/1/11 Fri 7/1/11 Tue 5/7/11 Tue 19/10/10 Tue 19/10/10 Mon 18/4/11 Sun 29/1/12 Sun 29/1/12 Sun 28/2/10 Sun 28/2/10 Wed 12/5/10 Wed 12/5/10 Sun 29/1/12 Sun 31/10/10 Tue 15/3/11 Tue 15/3/11 Mon 28/2/11 Mon 31/1/11 Thu 17/2/11 Thu 17/2/11 Tue 16/8/11 Fri 29/7/11 Fri 29/7/11 Sun 29/1/12 Thu 17/2/11 Fri 29/7/11 Fri 29/7/11 Sun 29/1/12 Fri 8/7/11 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 14/5/10 Fri 8/7/11 Fri 28/5/10 Sat 12/3/11 Sat 12/3/11 Fri 8/7/11

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 3

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY: HIDPR COMPACTOR
ID 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 Task Name Zone A1 (ACTL-West Tower) Construction (3.0 month) Zone A1 Preloading Start (4 months) Zone A1 Preloading End Zone B (Car Park) Construction (4 months) Zone B Preloading Start (4 months) Zone B Preloading End Zone C (District Cooling Plant & Sub-station) Construction (3 Zone C Preloading Start (4 months) Zone C Preloading End EW 02A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain - RWY3 (Conventional) EW 02A Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Survey Data Verification & Confirmation Appointment of Soil Investigation (S.I.) Contractor Soil Investigation Works S.I Result & Prepare Report Design Works EW 02A Procurement (Area 1) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 1) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 9.5 mo Area 1 Preloading Start Area 1 Preloading End EW 02A Procurement (Area 2) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 2) Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 1.5 mo Area 2 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 2 Preloading End EW 02A Procurement (Area 3) Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor EW 02A Construction (Area 3) Duration 175 days 0 days 0 days 229 days 0 days 0 days 173 days 0 days 0 days 1001 days 87 days 0 days 9 days 0 days 29 days 23 days 32 days 99 days 23 days 24 days 49 days 0 days 815 days 19 days 621 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 40 days 21 days 40 days 0 days 378 days 7 days 189 days 0 days 0 days 104 days 40 days 21 days 40 days 0 days 378 days Start Thu 29/7/10 Sun 23/1/11 Sat 21/5/11 Tue 29/6/10 Wed 16/2/11 Tue 14/6/11 Tue 29/6/10 Mon 20/12/10 Wed 20/4/11 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Wed 22/7/09 Thu 23/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Mon 3/8/09 Mon 24/8/09 Thu 17/9/09 Wed 21/10/09 Wed 21/10/09 Fri 13/11/09 Tue 8/12/09 Mon 1/2/10 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 2/2/10 Tue 16/2/10 Sat 5/11/11 Mon 7/5/12 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Mon 11/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Wed 22/12/10 Fri 1/7/11 Tue 3/1/12 Wed 1/9/10 Wed 1/9/10 Mon 11/10/10 Mon 1/11/10 Tue 14/12/10 Wed 15/12/10 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 20 nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quartend Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J Sun 23/1/11 29/7 23/1 Sun 23/1/11 Sat 21/5/11 Wed 16/2/11 Wed 16/2/11 Tue 14/6/11 Mon 20/12/10 Mon 20/12/10 Wed 20/4/11 Mon 7/5/12 Tue 20/10/09 Wed 22/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Fri 31/7/09 Tue 1/9/09 Wed 16/9/09 Tue 20/10/09 Mon 1/2/10 Thu 12/11/09 Mon 7/12/09 Fri 29/1/10 Mon 1/2/10 Mon 7/5/12 Sat 20/2/10 Sat 5/11/11 Sat 5/11/11 Mon 7/5/12 Tue 14/12/10 Sun 10/10/10 Sun 31/10/10 Fri 10/12/10 Tue 14/12/10 Tue 3/1/12 Tue 21/12/10 Fri 1/7/11 Fri 1/7/11 Tue 3/1/12 Tue 14/12/10 Sun 10/10/10 Sun 31/10/10 Fri 10/12/10 Tue 14/12/10 Tue 3/1/12 1/9 11/10 1/11 10/10 31/10 10/12 14/12 EW 02A Construction (Area 3) EW 02A Procurement (Area 3) 15/12 22/12 21/12 1/7 1/7 3/1 1/9 11/10 1/11 10/10 31/10 10/12 14/12 EW 02A Construction (Area 2) EW 02A Procurement (Area 2) 2/2 16/2 20/2 5/11 5/11 7/5 21/10 13/11 8/12 12/11 7/12 29/1 1/2 EW 02A Construction (Area 1) 3/8 24/8 17/9 23/7 22/7 31/7 31/7 1/9 16/9 20/10 EW 02A Procurement (Area 1) EW 02A Design Stage 29/6 20/12 20/12 20/4 EW 02A Site Prepn, Ewk & Main Drain - RWY3 (Conventiona 29/6 16/2 16/2 14/6 23/1 21/5

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 4

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline

SIMULATOR SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW LCC TERMINAL PROJECT: WITHOUT ELEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY: HIDPR COMPACTOR
ID 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 Task Name Mobilization & Site Preparation Earthwork & Platform Preparation for RWY/TWY 3 (2 + 1.5 mo Area 3 Preloading Start (6 mths) Area 3 Preloading End AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (Conventional) AF 01 Design Stage Appoinment of Design Consultant Design Works AF 01 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor AF 01 Construction Mobilization Received Access 1.3KM from EW02A Firtst 1.3 km Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (4.0 months) Remaining area of Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (4.0 months) AF 02 Cross Taxiway Between RWY2 & RWY3 (Conventional) AF 02 Design Stage Appointment of Design Consultant Design Works AF 02 Procurement Tender Documentation Tender Period Tender Evaluation Appointment of Contractor AF 02 Construction Mobilization Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE K (1.0 month) Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE E2 (1.5 month) Taxiway Between Runway 2 & 3, ZONE I2 (4.0 months) Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE F2 (1.5 month) At Relocation area Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3B & L1 (4 months Taxiway parallel to Rway 2&3, ZONE E3 & L (3 months) Duration 7 days 189 days 0 days 0 days 1124 days 1124 days 216 days 0 days 124 days 149 days 57 days 45 days 46 days 0 days 217 days 30 days 0 days 120 days 118 days 966 days 336 days 0 days 116 days 120 days 31 days 45 days 44 days 0 days 435 days 30 days 31 days 45 days 120 days 46 days 253 days 122 days 91 days Start Wed 15/12/10 Wed 22/12/10 Fri 1/7/11 Tue 3/1/12 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Mon 23/11/09 Sun 2/10/11 Sun 2/10/11 Mon 28/11/11 Sun 15/1/12 Thu 1/3/12 Fri 2/3/12 Fri 2/3/12 Thu 7/6/12 Fri 8/6/12 Fri 8/6/12 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 19/8/09 Mon 5/4/10 Fri 15/10/10 Fri 15/10/10 Mon 15/11/10 Sun 2/1/11 Mon 14/2/11 Tue 15/2/11 Tue 15/2/11 Sat 16/7/11 Tue 16/8/11 Thu 17/3/11 Sat 1/10/11 Wed 17/8/11 Wed 17/8/11 Mon 30/1/12 Finish 2010 2011 2012 2013 20 nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quartend Quart rd Quart th Quarte st Quart nd Quart rd Quart th Quarte st A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J Tue 21/12/10 15/12 21/12 Fri 1/7/11 Fri 1/7/11 Tue 3/1/12 Sat 6/10/12 Sat 6/10/12 Wed 31/3/10 Wed 19/8/09 Wed 31/3/10 Thu 1/3/12 Sun 27/11/11 Sat 14/1/12 Wed 29/2/12 Thu 1/3/12 Sat 6/10/12 Sat 31/3/12 Thu 7/6/12 Sat 6/10/12 Thu 4/10/12 Sun 29/4/12 Fri 30/7/10 Wed 19/8/09 Fri 30/7/10 Mon 14/2/11 Sun 14/11/10 Fri 31/12/10 Mon 14/2/11 Mon 14/2/11 Sun 29/4/12 Wed 16/3/11 Mon 15/8/11 Fri 30/9/11 Fri 15/7/11 Tue 15/11/11 Sun 29/4/12 Sun 18/12/11 Sun 29/4/12 17/8 18/12 30/1 29/4 17/3 15/2 16/3 16/7 16/8 15/7 1/10 15/11 At Relocation area 15/8 30/9 15/10 15/11 2/1 14/11 31/12 14/2 14/2 AF 02 Construction 5/4 30/7 AF 02 Procurement AF 02 Design Stage 8/6 8/6 2/3 31/3 7/6 6/10 4/10 AF 02 Cross Taxiway Between RWY2 & RWY3 (Conventional) 2/10 28/11 15/1 27/11 14/1 29/2 1/3 AF 01 Construction 23/11 31/3 AF 01 Procurement AF 01 Design Stage 22/12 1/7 1/7 3/1 AIRSIDE FACILITIES AF 01 Runway 3 & Parallel Taxiway (Convent

Task Critical Task

Progress Milestone

Summary Project Summary Page 5

External Tasks External Milestone

Deadline