Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
DECEMBER 2002
Question 1
XYZ Ltd. has seven directors comprising of a chairman and managing director
(CMD), a whole-time director, a finance director (FD) and four independent
directors. While discussing these documents at the meeting, one of the directors
suggested as follows :
As the Company Secretary of the XYZ Ltd., comment on the above suggestions.
(8 marks)
Answer 1(a)
The steps, which are required to be taken for incorporation and commencement of
business of a public limited company having share capital, are as follows :
1. Select name of the Company and ascertain its availability from ROC:
Promoters are required to select at least four names for the proposed company and
secure the name availability by making an application to the Registrar of Companies
of the State in which they want to have the proposed company incorporated. The
application is required to be made in Form No.1A as prescribed in the Companies
(Central Government’s) General Rules and Forms, 1956 along with the prescribed
application fee of Rs. 500/-.
The names of the proposed company are to be given in Form No.1A in the order of the
promoter’s preference so that if the first name is not available, the Registrar may
consider the other names in the order of preference given. The proposed names should
not be identical with, or too closely resemble, the names by which a company in
existence has been previously registered.
Where the Registrar of Companies informs the promoters of the company that the
changed name or the name with which the proposed company is to be registered, as
the case may be, is not undesirable, such name shall be available for adoption by the
promoters of the proposed company for six months from the date of intimation by the
Registrar.
If within the stipulated period of six months, the company is not incorporated by the
name made available by the Registrar or if the existing name of the company is not
changed to the new name made available by the Registrar, the validity period of the
name expires. In order to have the name revalidated for a further period of six months,
the promoters will have to make an application explaining therein the reasons for not
having availed the name within the validity period. The application shall be delivered
in the office of concerned Registrar of Companies and on receipt of his approval, the
name may be availed during the extended period of time.
Before getting the Memorandum and Articles printed, it is advisable to have their
drafts vetted by the concerned Registrar of Companies to avoid unnecessary
expenditure of time and money in getting them printed and reprinted after
incorporating modifications etc. that may be suggested by the Registrar.
A public limited company need not necessarily prepare and get its Articles of
Association registered along with its Memorandum of Association. In such case, Table
“A” of Schedule I to the Companies Act, 1956 shall apply. However, as a matter of
practice, every company gets the articles prepared, to suit its individual requirements,
and registered along with the Memorandum of Association.
After incorporating the suggestions made by the Registrar during informal vetting of
the documents, the Memorandum and Articles should be got printed and stamped by
the appropriate State Authority (Collector of Stamps) under the Indian Stamp Act.
Thereafter, the Memorandum and the Articles should be signed by at least seven
subscribers.
Each subscriber to the Memorandum shall write in his/her own hand, his/her name,
his/her father/husband’s name, occupation, address and the number of shares,
subscribed by him/her. The signatures of all the subscribers shall also be witnessed.
The witness shall also sign and write in his own hand, his name, his father’s name,
occupation and address.
The Memorandum and Articles are then dated, but the date must be a date of stamping
or later than the date of their stamping and not, in any event, a date prior to the date of
their stamping.
a. Power of Attorney: With a view to fulfilling various formalities that are required
for incorporation of a company, the promoters may execute a power of attorney
in favour of any one of them or an advocate or some other professional like the
Chartered Accountant or the Company Secretary. The Power of Attorney should
be prepared on a non-judicial stamp paper of a value prescribed by the Stamp
Act of the concerned State.
b. Consent of the directors: As per Section 266 of the Companies Act, 1956, in the
case of a public limited company having share capital, a person cannot be
appointed as a director by its Articles of Association unless, he has, before the
registration of the Articles, either himself or through his agent, signed and filed,
with the registrar his consent in writing to act as director. The consent must be
filed in Form No. 29 of the Companies (Central Government’s) General Rules
and Forms, 1956.
c. Form No. 32: Where the company by its articles appoints any person(s) as a
director, manager, or secretary, it may file their particulars in duplicate, in Form
No. 32, with the Registrar at the time of incorporation. However, Form No. 32
can also be filed within 30 days of incorporation of the company or appointment
of the first directors.
d. Statutory declaration: Section 33(2) of the Act requires a declaration to be filed
with the Registrar of Companies along with the memorandum and the articles.
This is known as “Statutory Declaration of Compliance”. It can be made by an
advocate of Supreme Court or of a High Court; or an Attorney or a pleader
entitled to appear before a High Court; or a Company secretary, or a Chartered
Accountant practicing in India and engaged in the formation of the company or
by a person named in the articles as a Director, manager, or Secretary of the
company. Any of the aforesaid persons has to declare that all the requirements
of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Rules there under have been complied with
in respect of registration and matters precedent and incidental thereto.
The next step is filing of all documents with the Registrar for registration of the
company. The documents are required to be filed with the Registrar of Companies of
the State in which the company is proposed to be incorporated, along with the
prescribed registration and filing fees.
It must be ensured that the minimum paid-up capital of the company is five lakh
rupees or such higher paid-up capital as may be prescribed.
A private company can commence business immediately after receiving the Certificate
of Incorporation. However, a public company having a share capital cannot do so.
Such company is required to obtain another certificate known as the Certificate to
Commence Business, before it can start its business. Section 149(1) of the Companies
Act, 1956 lays down that a public company having a share capital and which has
issued a prospectus inviting public to subscribe for its shares shall not commence any
business or exercise any borrowing powers unless -
a. shares held subject to the payment of the whole amount thereof in cash have
been allotted to an amount not less than in the whole than the minimum
subscription;
b. every director of the company has paid to the company on each of the shares
taken or contracted to be taken by him and for which he is liable to pay in cash,
a proportion equal to the proportion payable on application and allotment on the
shares offered for public subscription;
c. no money is or may become, liable to be repaid to applicant for any shares or
debentures which have been offered for public subscription by reason of any
failure to apply for, or to obtain permission for the shares or debentures to be
dealt in on any recognised stock exchange;
d. there has been filed with the Registrar a duly verified declaration by one of the
directors or the secretary, or where the company has not appointed a secretary, a
secretary in whole-time practice, in the prescribed form that clauses (a), (b) and
(c) of this sub-section have been complied with.
Where a company having a share capital has not issued a prospectus inviting the
public to subscribe for its shares, the company shall not commence any business or
exercise any borrowing powers, unless -
a. there has been filed with the Registrar a statement in lieu of prospectus;
b. every director of the company has paid to the company on each of the shares
taken or contracted to be taken by him and for which he is liable to pay in cash,
a proportion equal to the proportion payable on application and allotment on the
shares payable in cash;
c. there has been filed with the Registrar a duly verified declaration by one of the
directors or the secretary, or where the company has not appointed a secretary, a
secretary in whole-time practice, in the prescribed form that clause (b) of this
sub-section has been complied with.
The Registrar shall, on filing of a duly verified declaration in accordance with the
provisions of Sub-section (1) or (2), as the case may be, and in the case of company
which is required by Sub-section (2) to file a statement in lieu of prospectus, also of
such a statement, certify that the company is entitled to commence business and that
certificate shall be conclusive evidence that the company is so entitled to commence
its business.
Answer 1(b)
i. In terms of Section 217(4) of the Companies Act, 1956, the directors’ report of
the company is required to be signed by its chairman if he is authorized in that
behalf, by the Board and where he is not so authorized the report shall be signed
by its manager or secretary, if any and by not less than two directors, one of
whom shall be managing director, where there is one. In the present problem,
CMD may sign the directors’ report if he is authorised in that behalf by the
Board. Where he is not so authorised the directors’ report shall be signed by
secretary and two directors one of whom shall be managing director.
ii. Section 215(1)(ii) of the Companies Act, 1956 requires every balance-sheet and
every profit and loss account of the company to be signed on behalf of the
Board of directors, by its manager or secretary, if any, and by not less than two
directors of the company, one of whom shall be a managing director where there
is one. Therefore suggestion for signing the balance-sheet by CMD, FD and
Company Secretary is correct.
iii. As per Section 229 of the Companies Act, 1956, only the person appointed as
auditor of the company or a partner in the firm, where a firm is so appointed in
pursuance of proviso to Section 226(1), may sign the auditors’ report.
Therefore, suggestion in the given case, is not correct as there is no necessity for
countersigning auditors’ report either by FD or Company Secretary.
iv. In terms of Rule 4(4) of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposits) Rules,1975,
the statement in lieu of advertisement is required to be signed by majority of the
directors on the Board of Directors of the company as constituted at the time the
Board approved the advertisement or their agents, duly authorized by them in
writing. Thus, statement in lieu of advertisement has to be signed by majority of
directors and not by all directors.
Question 2
Answer 2(i)
Mr. Smart is already a member of the Board of Directors of Big Brothers Ltd., having
been nominated by the company’s Swedish collaborators. Subject to the provisions of
Articles of Association of Big Brothers Ltd., Mr. Smart can be appointed as Managing
Director of the company. His appointment to the post of Managing Director would
require the approval of members at general meeting. Further Mr. Smart, being an
expatriate, his appointment as Managing Director would also require the approval of
Central Government. For this purpose a general notice shall be given to the members
about the proposed appointment in accordance with the provisions of Section 640B
and an application in Form No. 25A shall be submitted to the Central Government
with a copy of aforesaid notice. Thereafter an agreement shall be executed between
Mr. Smart and the company, as approved by the Central Government.
Answer 2(ii)
The overall limit on Deposits is 25% of the paid-up capital and free reserves of the
company plus an additional 10% of the paid-up share capital and free reserves. The
period of the deposit shall not exceed 3 years. Failure to repay deposits and/or interest
thereon attracts penalties on the Company as well as the Director.
Answer 2(iii)
According to Section 260 of the Companies Act, 1956 the Board of Directors may
appoint additional Directors within the strength of the Board stipulated in the Articles.
However the total number of directors and additional directors shall not exceed the
maximum strength of directors fixed for the Board by the Articles of the company. In
the given problem, Kapil may be appointed by the Board of directors by passing
resolution either at its meeting or by circulation, provided the Articles of Big Brothers
Ltd. company contain a provision regarding the appointment of additional directors. If
the articles do not contain provision in this respect, the Articles have to be altered to
insert therein, a regulation empowering the Board to appoint additional director. It
should be ensured that the proposed appointee does not suffer from any
disqualification under Sections 274, 275 and 278 of the Act. The consent of Kapil in
Form 29 and the prescribed particulars in Form 32 shall be filed with the ROC within
30 days of his appointment. Kapil shall hold office till the next AGM of the company.
Answer 2 (iv)
Section 224(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 provides that the retiring auditor shall be
reappointed unless any of the circumstances specified in clauses (a) to (d) thereof
exist. Since the retiring auditor is not seeking reappointment, there is no obligation on
the part of company to reappoint the retiring auditor and the company may proceed to
appoint as auditor, any person other than retiring auditor, having requisite
qualifications. Under Section 225 of the Act, a special notice is required for appointing
a person other than the retiring auditor. Thus general meeting should be duly convened
and the necessary resolution should be passed to appoint an auditor other than the
retiring auditor.
Question 3
Explain the purpose, contents, time limit for filing and other relevant aspects, if
any, relating to the filing of the following forms under the Companies Act, 1956:
Answer 3(i)
Form No. 8
Contents:
Time Limit: Within 30 days after date of creation of charge or modification thereof.
Answer 3(ii)
Form No. 18
Contents:
Answer 3 (iii)
Form No. 23
Contents:
Other relevant aspects: This Form has to be submitted with the following annexures:
Answer 3 (iv)
Form No. 29
Contents:
Answer 3(v)
Form No. 32
Contents:
Time Limit: Within 30 days of appointment or change, as the case may be.
Other relevant aspects: Two copies of Form No. 32 have to be submitted to Registrar
of Companies along with a forwarding letter addressed to the Registrar of Companies.
Question 4
Answer 4(a)
Section 179 of the Companies Act, 1956 provides that before or on declaration of the
result of the voting on any resolution on a show of hands, a poll may be ordered to be
taken by the Chairman of the meeting of his own motion, and shall be ordered to be
taken by him on demand made in that behalf by the person(s) specified below, viz.:
i. which confer a power to vote on the resolution not being less than one-
tenth of the total voting power in respect of the resolution; or
ii. on which an aggregate sum of not less than Rs.50,000 has been paid up.
b. in the case of a private company having a share capital, by one member having
the right to vote on the resolution and, present in person or by proxy, if not more
than seven members are personally present;
c. in the case of any other company, by any member or members present in person
or by proxy and having not less than one-tenth of the total voting power in
respect of the resolution.
The demand for poll may be withdrawn at any time by the person or persons who
made the demand [Section 179(2)].
1. The chairman shall appoint two scrutineers to scrutinize the votes given on the
poll and to report thereon to him. One of the two scrutineers must be a member
Answer 4(b)
i. buy-back is made only out of its free reserves or securities premium account or
the proceeds of any shares or other specified securities;
ii. buy-back is not made out of the proceeds of an earlier issue of the same kind of
shares or same kind of other specified securities;
iii. the ratio of the debt owed by the company is not more than twice the capital and
its free reserves after such buy-back except where a higher ratio has been
prescribed by the Central Government for a class or classes of company;
iv. all the shares or other specified securities for buy-back are fully paid-up;
v. the buy-back of shares or other specified securities is in accordance with the
SEBI (Buy-back of Securities) Regulations, 1998.
3. A declaration of solvency in the prescribed form shall be filed with the Registrar
of Companies and SEBI before making the buy back. This declaration has to be
given by the Board of Directors to the effect that they have made a full inquiry
into the affairs of the company and have formed an opinion that the company is
capable of meeting its liabilities and will not be rendered insolvent within a
period of one year of the date of declaration. This declaration is to be signed by
any two directors one of whom shall be the managing director, if any.
4. The securities so bought back must be physically destroyed within seven days of
the last date of completion of buy back.
5. After completion of buy back, the company shall not make a further issue of the
same kind of securities (including right shares under Section 81) within a period
of 6 months
Question 5
Answer 5(a)
a. By Company
b. By Shareholders
Answer 5(b)
Section 125(4) of the Companies Act, 1956 lays down the following nine types of
charges that are registerable under the Act:
If the charge falls under any of the aforesaid categories, the following procedure will
have to adopted for the registration of such charge:
1. File particulars of the charge with the concerned Registrar of Companies within
thirty days of creating the charge in Form No.8 in triplicate and attach the
following documents with such Form:
2. If the particulars of charge cannot be filed within thirty days due to unavoidable
reasons, then file the same within sixty days of creating the charge after
satisfying the Registrar of Companies the reasons for delay and after payment of
additional fee.
3. In case the charge has been created outside India and it comprises solely of
property situated outside India then file the particular of the charge in Form
No.8 in triplicate within thirty days after the date on which the instrument
creating or evidencing the charge or copy thereof could, in due course of post
and if despatched with due diligence, have been received in India.
4. Verify the copy of the instrument or deed before filing, in the following manner:
5. Along with Form No.8, forward to the concerned Registrar of Companies ,the
particulars of charges in Form No.13 in triplicate with a fee of Rs.50/- in cash
for being entered in the register of charges. Form Nos. 8 and 13 and the
instrument evidencing charge in triplicate should be signed by both the company
and the creditor.
6. On receipt of the Forms, the concerned Registrar of Companies will endorse on
all the three copies including the accompanying instrument by rubber stamp
with the impression “Certified that the charge above is Registered” and sign the
same.
7. The company and creditor will get back the duplicate and triplicate copies while
first copy is retained by the ROC for his record.
Question 6
Draft specimen resolutions for transacting any four of the following items of
business indicating the kind of meeting at which each resolution is to be passed
and the type of resolution with majority required :
Answer 6(i)
Answer 6(ii)
Answer 6(iii)
“RESOLVED that pursuant to the provisions of Sections 258 and 259 of the
Companies Act, 1956 and subject to the approval of the Central Government, the
number of directors of the company be increased from eight to fifteen.“
Answer 6(iv)
Answer 6(v)
Question 7
a. PQR Ltd., having paid-up capital of Rs.50 lakh, entered into a contract
with company XYZ Ltd., in which director Dev was holding 20% shares.
The director did not disclose his interest at the time of approval of the
contract by the Board. How would you deal with this situation ?
b. Anand, who was appointed as an additional director of a public limited
company for the first time, filed his consent with the company. He also
signed his consent in the prescribed form and delivered the same to the
company for filing it with the Registrar of Companies. Due to inadvertence,
the said form was not filed within the stipulated time limit. State the course
of action that you would take in this regard.
c. Director-X and Director-Y of A Ltd. hold 0.5% and 1.25% of paid-up
capital of B Pvt. Ltd. respectively. Z, a relative of Director-X, also hold in
aggregate 0.5% paid-up capital of B Pvt. Ltd. Other than these, no other
director/relative of director of A Ltd. holds shares in B Pvt. Ltd. When A
Ltd. considers a proposed contract with B Pvt. Ltd., advise whether
Director-X or Director-Y or both the directors should disclose interest.
d. Mohan and Sohan jointly hold 5% of equity shares of Kirtiman Ltd., a
public unlisted company which has adopted Table-A as its articles. They
appointed P1 and P2 respectively as proxies to attend the 26th annual
general meeting of the company. How do you propose to deal with these
two proxies in the annual general meeting? (4 marks each)
Answer 7(a)
According to Section 299(1) of the Companies Act, 1956 every director of a company
who is in any way whether directly or indirectly concerned or interested in a contract
or arrangement or proposed contract or arrangement, entered into, or to be entered
into, by or on behalf of the company, shall disclose the nature of his concern or
interest at a meeting of Board of Directors. In the case of a proposed contract or
arrangement the disclosure, referred to above, shall be made at the meeting of the
Board at which the question of entering into contract or arrangement is first taken into
consideration or at the first meeting of the Board held after he becomes so interested
or concerned. Further under Section 300 of the Act, an interested director is prohibited
to take part in the discussion or vote on any contract or arrangement entered into by or
on behalf of the company where he is directly or indirectly interested in it.
In the present case, Dev is an interested director. He should have, therefore, disclosed
his interest in XYZ Ltd. Non-disclosure of interest by Dev will subject him to a
penalty of an amount which may extend to Rupees 5,000 as stipulated in Section 299
(4) of the Act. Further in accordance with the provisions of Section 283(1)(i) of the
Act, Dev will have to vacate his office. Failure to disclose interest renders the contract
voidable at the option of the Board.
Answer 7(b)
Section 264 of the Companies Act, 1956 deals with filing of consent by a director.
Under Sub-section (1), it is provided that every person proposed as a candidate for the
office of a director of a public company shall sign and file with the company, his
consent in writing to act as a director, if appointed. In the given situation, this
requirement has been duly complied with.
Sub-section (2) of said Section requires that a person shall not act as a director of the
company unless he has within thirty days of his appointment signed and filed with the
Registrar his consent in writing to act as such director. However, an additional director
is exempted to file such consent in case of his appointment as a director or re-
appointment as additional director immediately on the expiry of his term of office. In
the given case appointment being for the first time, non-filing of the consent within
thirty days shall result in non-compliance of Section 264(2). However, it has been
clarified by the Department of Company Affairs that failure to file the consent with
the Registrar, shall not result in the vacation of office of the Director. The only
consequence shall be that penalty under Section 629A would become attracted. Thus
such consent of Anand may be filed after the expiry of thirty days on payment of
additional fee as contemplated under Section 611(2) of the Act.
Answer 7(c)
According to Section 299(6) of the Companies Act, 1956, nothing in this section shall
apply to any contract or arrangement entered into or to be entered into between two
companies where any of the directors of one company or two or more of them together
holds or hold not more than two percent of the paid-up share capital in other company.
In the given case X and Y hold 0.5% and 1.25% of paid-up capital of B Pvt. Ltd
respectively, which does not exceed 2% of the paid-up capital of B Pvt. Limited.
Therefore, X and Y are not required to disclose their interest for the proposed contract.
However, in terms of Section 299(1), X is having indirect interest for the proposed
contract as his relative i.e. Z holds 0.5% of paid-up capital of B Pvt. Ltd. Therefore, X
will have to disclose his interest for the proposed contract and Y is not required to
disclose his interest for the same.
Answer 7(d)
Question 8
State the points to be taken care of, including the listing requirements, in drafting
the directors’ report of Sunrise Engineering Ltd., a listed company which has
been in business for 25 years and has a paid-up capital of Rs.75 crore for the year
ended 31st March, 2002. (16 marks)
Answer 8
In terms of Section 217 of the Companies Act, the information on the following
matters is required to be included in the Directors’ report:
As per Sub-section (2AA) of Section 217 of the Act, the Board’s report shall also
include a Directors’ Responsibility statement, indicating therein -
The Board’s report shall also specify the reasons for failure if any, to complete the
buy-back within the time specified in Section 77A(4). The Board shall also be bound
to give the fullest information and explanations in its report aforesaid, or, in cases
falling under the proviso to Section 222, in an addendum to that report, on every
reservation, qualification or adverse remark in the auditor’s report.