Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
P.
OF
OF
THE JOINT
ULNA OR
OF
R.
THE
WRIGHT,
RADIAL
ENGLAND
EPIPHYSIS
The
notice in
purpose the
of this
paper
is to describe
CASE
an
injury
of childhood
which
has
received
little
literature.
REPORTS
Case
1-A
boy
of
four
fell
on
to
his
right
arm,
injuring
his
elbow.
Radiographs
showed
greenstick displacement
fracture ofthe
of upper
the
end
of
the (Fig.
ulna I).
with The
deformity, reduced
and
forward
radius
under general anaesthesia Two weeks after removal the elbow and the forearm.
Case
1-Greenstick
fracture
of the ulna
and
forward
displacement
of
Case 2-Greenstick
fracture
of the ulna
and
forward
displacement
of
and was
of the
45 B,
4,
NOVEMBER
727
728
P.
R.
WRIGHT
under
plaster
general
the child
anaesthesia, in plaster
had regained
and was
although maintained
a full range
was
incomplete Two
movement
the weeks
of the
position after
elbow
was removal
and
at
accepted. of the
forearm.
Immobilisation
weeks.
Case
upper
3-A
end
boy of
of the
of pain
six
ulna
injured in the
with
his elbow,
varus
arm
while
and
doing showed
lateral
physical
displacement
training
school.
He
complained of
was
a greenstick
of
fracture
the upper
of the
the
end
deformity manipulation.
the
radius and
(Fig.
3).
The reduction
extent
was
Eight
not
days
at
first
later
recognised
the correct
and
diagnosis
arm
was
immobilised
in plaster
without
manipulative was
was removed
attempted and
without by four
and
success. weeks
supination
Open
was
reduction
rapidly
of the After
regained,
therefore
a full
carried
range
out,
offiexion,
remained
slightly
limited
(70 degrees
compared
with
90 degrees
side).
Case
3-Greenstick
fracture ment
FIG. 3 of the ulna with varus deformity of the upper end of the radius.
and
lateral
displace-
Case
and
4-A
girl
of
ten
fell
of
down
the for
a flight
fracture upper radial weeks. incomplete Flexion
of
steps
upper epiphysis
at
school
end (Fig.
and
of the 4). the was of the
injured
ulna with Open
her
valgus
right
elbow.
of the that to
Radiographs epiphysis
ill
a greenstick out,
of the
deformity
fracture-separation plaster
reduction
together
three was accepted. supination the ulnar
with
manipulation
On and and involved
ofthe
removal that extension limited. the there
ulnar
of
fracture,
plaster about elbow
and
immobilisation
clear returned four joint in view almost months (Fig. of cubitus
remained fracture
radiographs radio-ulnar
injury
5),
the but 6).
and
months
this
explained
after injury
a gradually
anterior
decreasing
tralispOsition of
range
the flexion
of
ulnar and
pronation
and
supination.
Eighteen
of full, (Fig.
performed remained
cubitus
valgus.
Thirty
months
after
injury
supination
Radiographs
and
pronation
suggested that
were
fusion
absent,
of the
the
forearm
superior
being
radio-ulnar
fixed
at 45 degrees
joint had taken
of supination.
place
Case
unknown.
5-A
boy
and
of thirteen
a fracture-separation
sustained showed
an
of the
injury
upper
to his
radial
left ofthe
elbow, upper
the end
There
details ofthe
was
of which ulna
also
were valgus
fracture
with
epiphysis.
separation
was by in plaster.
of the
OF
and
JOINT
forearm
SURGERY
JOURNAL
BONE
GREENSTICK
FRACTURE
OF THE UPPER
729
FIG.
Case 4-Greenstick fracture of the ulna
4
with valgus deformity and fracture-
separation
of the upper
radial
epiphysis.
FIG.
Case 4-Radiographs
and involvement
reduction, radio-ulnar
FIG.
Case 4-Radiographs taken thirty months
6
after injury suggesting fusion of
the
superior
radio-ulnar
joint.
VOL.
45 B,
NO.
4,
NOVEMBER
1963
P.
R.
WRIGHT
there
was
still
30 degrees
loss
of extension
and
40 degrees
loss time
of flexion. it became
was traumatic
limited ulnar
and
At
this had
of the united
Further superior
Case
5-Radiographs
after
reduction.
rr.,
,.
I
_#
L.
Case
5-Radiographs
fracture joint.
without
involvement
DISCUSSION
(1957)
described
three
cases
of undisplaced
fracture
of the
olecranon
in children
of the head of the radius. there was a varus deformity was displaced described the ulna two with other
the
The radiographs in his paper of the ulna at the site of the to the displacement type, was injury.
of the ulna may be, the
the head
ofthe
radius (1960)
in which
of
the
of
accompanied
of the literature
seems clear
of angulation
ulna and the radius remain in a fixed relationship to one another while the injury place. Only in this way can the correspondence between the direction of angulation ulna and the direction of displacement of the upper end of the radius be explained.
same reason it seems clear that this position must be one of full supination. The most probable mechanism therefore seems to be a fall on to the outstretched hand during which the forearm is held supinated (as it might be ifthe child were falling backwards). The direction of angulation
THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY
GREENSTICK
FRACTURE
OF
THE
UPPER
END
OF
THE
ULNA
of the
varus,
ulna
valgus
will
or (1957)
then
be determined
strain that
by the
on the anterior
exact
direction
(Fig. of
of the
9). the
fall,
of
produce
might
a
be
hyperextension suggested
forearm
Hume
displacement
head
the
explained
by
a hyperextension
strain
on
the
ulna
the
radius
is in
the
position
of
pronation-a mechanism similar to that described Monteggia fracture-dislocation. Such an explanation, with medial and lateral displacement. It
seems group, ing the result the exact from more injury direction failure likely the that all three the fall. types arm same, form durbut a in which position ofthe
(1949) could
is essentially
ofangulation
of the
is determined reduction
the
by may
true
Imperfect
to
recognise
injury may
(Cases
when not
seen.
it is recognised,
2 and
displaceto correct
2) Trau-
manipulation
matic ulnar neuritis is a considerable danger in those cases with valgus deformity if reduction is imperfect. injury was not seen
occurred in one and
in radial
3) this
of the
patients
displacement
by from Beddow
of the
Corkery
considered the
it to be a neurapraxia traction by the displaced nerve muscle. as must it winds occur 4) Injury to the only ulnar
radial
FRACTURE
OF
MONTEGGIA
INJURY
DEFORMITY
in all cases
9
of this injury and the
the joint.
SUMMARY
Monteggia
injury.
1.
Five
cases
fracture
of
the
upper
end
of the
ulna
with
dislocation
of
the
are described. direction of angulation of the fracture and the of the radius may be lateral, medial or anterior,
in which a fall on the the mechanism outstretched ofinjury hand is essentially with the forearm
corresponding it is suggested
the same. held This
cases
form
a group to be
is considered
3.
in supination.
The
complications
I should like
of the
injury
Mr
are
W. A.
described.
Watt Maney for permission to include Case 5.
to thank
REFERENCES
BEDDOW,
F. E. A. M.
H.,
and
CORKERY,
P. H.
Fracture
EVANS,
of the Upper
(1949):
End
Lateral
Journal Forearm.
Dislocation
of Bone and Journal
of the Radio-humeral
Joint ofBone Surgery, andJoint 42-B,
Joint
782. Surgerv,
with
31-B,
Greenstick
578.
Pronation
HUME,
of the Head
of Bone and
of the
Joint
Radius
Surgery,
with
Undisplaced
Fracture
VOL.
4,
1963