Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
1979-59
79-0059
ii
Abstract_
A comparison of guidance laws a p p l i c a b l e t o s h o r t r a n g e t a c t i c a l m i s s i l e s is made. These laws are segmented i n t o several c l a s s e s and t h e p r i n c i p l e s u n d e r l y i n g e a c h c l a s s are d i s c u s s e d . S p e c i f i c a t t e n t i o n i s g i v e n t o t h e s t r u c t u r e of t h e guidance t e c h n i q u e and t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r i t s implementat i o n . E v a l u a t i o n and comparison o f t h e performance of t a c h g u i d a n c e l a w versus t h e c o s t o f implementing i t are c o n s i d e r e d . An e x t e n s i v e b i b l i o g r a p h y of r e l e v a n t l i t e r a t u r e is included.
Downloaded by Beihang University (CNPIEC - XI'AN BRANCH) on April 24, 2013 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-59
system. H e r e t o f o r e t h e s e two classes o f weapons each were developed i n d e p e n d e n t l y . T h i s r e s e a r c h s h a l l a t t e m p t t o view them as p o t e n t i a l l y s i m i l a r systems t h a t u t i l i z e d i f f e r e n t modules s u c h as p r o p u l s i o n , g u i d a n c e , warhead, e t c . The f i r s t s c e p i n implementing t h i s t a s k was t o c o n d u c t a l i t e r a t u r e s u r v e y t o e s t a b l i s h a technology b a s e s t a r t i n g p o i n t . C o n s t r a i n t s on l e n g t h of t h e p a p e r r e s u l t i n summarizing ( a l p h a b e t i c a l l y by a u t h o r ) t h e l i s t t o i n c l u d e only t h o s e r e f e r ences c o n s i d e r e d by t h e a u t h o r s t o be most r e l e v a n t . Following t h i s s u r v e y , guidance l a w s were p l a c e d i n f i v e c a t e g o r i e s and d e f i n e d m a t h e m a t i c a l l y . The implementation and p r e d i c t e d performance of each c a t e g o r y was t h t a i n v e s t i g a t e d and compared in l i g h t of c u r r e n t and p r e d i c t e d hardware and s o f t w a r e capab i l i t i e s . This paper d e s c r i b e s t h e s e r e s u l t s .
1.
Introduction
The US Army M i s s i l e Research and Development C o m n d (MIRADCOM) r e c e n t l y began a t a s k t o develop a n advanced g u i d a n c e and c o n t r o l s y s t e m f o r f u r t h e r Army Modular Missiles. The i n t e n t i s t o " l e a p f r o g " systems c u r r e n t l y u n d e r development. The purpose o f t h i s p a p e r i s eo d e s c r i b e t h e work t h a t h a s been done w i t h i n t h i s new t a s k and t o p r o v i d e an i n d i c a t i o n o f f u t u r e e f f o r t s t h a t are now planned.
T h e reason f o r embarking on t h i s t a s k is now s u m a r i z e d . P r e s e n t weapon systems performance may b e s e r i o u s l y degraded i n engagements a g a i n s t t a r g e t s w i t h p r e d i c t e d c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of t h e 1990s and beyond and i n t h e b a t t l e f i e l d environments of t h a t time frame ( s e e , e . g . , p . 1 1 , A v i a t i o n Week and Space T e c h n o l o m , March 20, 1978). I t h a s been e s t a b l i s h e d t h a t t h e guidance laws c u r r e n t l y i n wide use may n o t be a d e q u a t e t o combat t h o s e t h r e a t s . Thus, i t is p r o j e c t e d t h a t fundamental advances i n guidance and control systems t h e o r y are r e q u i r e d t o enhance t h e e f f e c t i v e n e s s of f u t u r e weapon s y s t e m s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , m i s s i l e a i r f r a m e and p r o p u l s i o n systems may r e q u i r e advances c o m e n % r a t e with t h e predicted t a r g e t s c e n a r i o s . I n p a r t i c u l a r , a i r d e f e n s e weapons c u r r e n t l y i n Research and Development (R&D) may be s e r i o u s l y hampered i n t h e combat s c e n a r i o s e n v i s i o n e d . From a n overall systems v i e w p o i n t , t h i s t a s k s h a l l a d d i e s s t h e i s s u e o f c r e a t i n g new t h e o r y i n the g u i d a n c e and c o n t r o l area t o meet t h e h i g h performance t h r e a t of t h e f u t u r e a s a l e a d i n g technology item. C l o s e l y a s s o c i a t e d w i t h i t and i n p a r a l l e l w i t h t h e g u i d a n c e and c o n t r o l e f f o r t , weapon system work s h a l l be u n d e r t a k e n t o modify a i r f r a m e and p r o p u l s i o n modules t o be c a p a b l e of engaging t h e 1990s t h r e a t . G e n e r a l s u p p o r t weapons s h a l l b e viewed i n i t i a l l y as a s u b s e t of t h e a i r d e f e n s e
11.
Guidance Laws
The development o f guidance laws f o r s h o r t r a n g e t a c t i c a l m i s s i l e s h a s become a w e l l - r e s e a r c h e d t o p i c over the p a s t 25 y e a r s . A summary of a d e t a i l e d l i t e r a t u r e s u r v e y , how each guidance l a w c a n be implemented, and guidance l a w p r e d i c t e d p e r formance are d e s c r i b e d w i t h i n t h e f i v e guidance law categories stated i n the Introduction. L i n e of- S i g h t Guidance (Command- t o - L i n e - o f - S i g h t and B e a m R i d e r 1 Clemow (1960), i n h i s book M i s s i l e Guidance, p r o v i d e s a d e t a i l e d d i s c u s s i o n o f beam r i d i n g , w h i l e Mahapatra (1976) d i s c u s s e s m o r p h o l o g i c a l d e s i g n based on beam r i d i n g , Clemow (1960) d i s c u s s e s co-nd-to-line-of-sight (CLOS) w h i l e Kain and Yost (1976) u s e t h i s method i n t h e i r s h i p d e f e n s e s c e n a r i o , u s i n g Kalman f i l t e r s t o r e d u c e beam j i t t e r .
A t t h e MIRADCOM, CLOS and Beam R i d e r (BR) conc e p t s are each c o n s i d e r a d a s u b s e t of the l i n e - o f s i g h t guidance laws. They d i f f e r p r i m a r i l y i n t h e i r m e c h a n i z a t i o n . The CLOS uses a w i r e f o r t h e transponder l i n k , e.g., T O W o r DRAGON. BR may use a n e l e c t r o - o p t i c a l l i n k , e . g . , SHILLELAGH, and f l y i n a d i r e c t e d beam aimed a t t h e t a r g e t . G e n e r i c a l l y they a r e s i m i l a r and w i l l b e d i s c u s s e d as one.
t A s s o c i a t e P r o f e s s o r , E l e c t r i c a l E n g i n e e r i n g Department.
This paper ih declared P work 01 Ihe US. Gorernmcnl and Iherelorei, in thepublicdornsin.
i /
The l i n e - o f - s i g h t (LOS) guidance scheme (CLOS and BR) i s one i n which t h e missile is guided on an LOS c o u r s e so as t o remain on a l i n e a d j o i n i n g t h e t a r g e t and t h e p o i n t of c o n t r o l . To f l y a l o n g t h e LOS, t h e missile r e q u i r e s a v e l o c i t y component (V )
M1
p e r p e n d i c u l a r t o t h e u)S t h a t i s e q u a l t o t h e M S v e l o c i t y d e s c r i b e d by t h e r e l a t i o n
complex t h a n d e p i c t e d h e r e . Also t h e BR missile r e q u i r e s anboard a u t o p i l o t compensation s i n c e t h e p r o j e c t o r does not know where t h e missile i s l o c a t e d once e n r o u t e . The CMS scheme, however, does keep t r a c k o f t h e m i s s i l e and t h u s compensates f o r i t s p o s i t i o n p r i o r t o transmitting the guidance s i g n a l via the w i r e link. Performance o f m i s s i l e s f l y i n g t h i s guidance law i s t y p i c a l l y v e r y good. Without t h e man-int h e - l o o p t r a c k i n g e r r o r , flawless guidance h a s been t h e r u l e : t a r g e t h i t s c a n be expected v i r t u a l l y on each s h o t . I n t h e more r e a l i s t i c c o n d i t i o n where t h e t h e t r a c k i n g e r r o r i s t h e major e r r o r s o u r c e , g i v e n t h a t a r e l i a b l e round h a s been f i r e d , t h e p e r f o m a w e h a s been found t o be b e t t e r t h a n 1 f t CEP w i t h a 90% c o n f i d e n c e l e v e l . P u r s u i t Guidance Goodstein (1972) gave a comparison o f t h e q u a l i t i e s and s e n s i t i v i t i e s of LOS, p u r s u i t , and p r o p o r t i o n a l n a v i g a t i o n guidance f o r a i r - t o - g r o u n d and a i r - t o - a i r missiles. I n a n o t h e r paper i n t h e same r e p o r t , Goodstein d i s c u s s e s t h e guidance and c o n t r o l system t r a d e o f f s i n m i s s i l e design.
' M I
= %M
'ST
(1)
Downloaded by Beihang University (CNPIEC - XI'AN BRANCH) on April 24, 2013 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-59
I n g e n e r a l , t h e missile f l i e s a p u r s u i t guidance c o u r s e a t t h e i n i t i a t i o n o f t h e e n t r y i n t o t h e beam a t launch and f l i e s an approximately c o n s t a n t b e a r i n g course near impact. This i s observed from t h e velocity equation
'Mi
- %M _
RST T '
ST
v e l o c i t y r e l a t i v e t o the s u r f a c e of t h e e a r t h . F i g u r e s 1 and 2 a r e s i m p l i f i e d c o n t r o l b l o c k diagrams h i g h l i g h t i n g f e a t u r e s of t h e scheme f o r e a c h of t h e two cases. I t should be noted t h a t t h e p r o j e c t o r mount dynamics i n F i g u r e 1 and t h e t r a c k e r mount dynamics i n F i g u r e 2 may be c o n s i d e r a b l y more
Two p u r s u i t guidance laws are d i s c u s s e d h e r e i n : a t t i t u d e p u r s u i t g u i d a n c e and v e l o c i t y p u r s u i t guidance. A t t i t u d e p u r s u i t guidance tries t o keep t h e c e n t e r l i n e of t h e m i s s i l e p o i n t e d a t t h e t a r s e t . I n a m i s s i l e which f l i e s an a n g l e o f a t t a c k when maneuvering, t h e v e l o c i t y v e c t o r w i l l always l a g
PROJECTOR
RANGE ZOOM
ACCELERATION
m!
F i g u r e 1.
AM
I
Beam R i d e r Scheme$<
TRACKER
GAIN PROGRAM
ACCELERATION
F i g u r e 2,
Command-to-Line-of-Sight
Scheme*
.
"Implementation scheme provided by R. H. Farmer, Technology L a b o r a t o r y , US Army Missile Research and Development Comand.
2
t h e v e h i c l e p o i n t i n g d i r e c t i o n . Miss d i s t a n c e i s a s t r o n g f u n c t i o n of the maneuver c a p a b i l i t y o i t h e m i s s i l e and can be reduced by a f a s t responding high-g vehicle. V e l o c i t y p u r s u i t g u i d a n c e a t t e m p t s t o keep t h e v e l o c i t y v e c t o r of t h e m i s s i l e p o i n t e d a t t h e targ e t . I t i s mechanized i n sone less s o p h i s t i c a t e d missiles by mounting a target sensor o n an a i r vane which i n d i c a t e s r e l a t i v e wind d i r e c t i o n . The d i i ference between t h i s v e l o c i t y v e c t o r and a t r u e v e l o c i t y v e c t o r is t h e primary error i n t h e scheme. The a t t i t u d e p u r s u i t guidance m e c h a n i z a t i o n d e c o u p l e s t h e a n g l e o f a t t a c k from t h e t a r g e t s e e k e r and improves m i s s d i s t a n c e performancc by a n amount p r o p o r t i o n a l t o t h e v e h i c l e a n g l e o f a t t a c k . F i g u r e 3 d e p i c t s two-dimensional geometry useful f o r d e s c r i b i n g t h e p u r s u i t guidance laws.
Downloaded by Beihang University (CNPIEC - XI'AN BRANCH) on April 24, 2013 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-59
Figure 4.
A t t i t u d e P u r s u i t Guidance
F i g u r e 5. V e l o c i t y P u r s u i t Guidance
Figure 3.
P u r s u i t Guidance Geometr)
N e g l e c t i n g t h e c a s e of a maneuvering t a r g e t , f o r s i m p l i c i t y , one n o t e s t h a t
i = vT - v M
and the LOS r a t e i s
'
(3)
The performance t o be expected f r o m p u r s u i t guidance i s i n d i c a t e d i n F i g u r e s 6 , 7, and 8. These were o b t a i n e d f o r a t a c t i c a l weapon of t h e c l a s s known as close s u p p o r t a n t i t a n k weapons. They a r e i n d i c a t i v e o f t h e q u a l i t y of performance one may e x p e c t f o r t h e s e guidance laws. Although t h e s e are s i m u l a t i o n r e s u l t s , r e c e n t experience with f l i g h t hardware h a s v a l i d a t e d t h e s i m u l a t e d pcriormance t o a h i g h d e g r e e of c o n f i d e n c e .
40
I I
ATTITUDE PURSUll
F i g u r e s 4 and 5 p r e s e n t examples of s i m p l i f i e d c o n t r o l s y s t e m diagrams f o r t h e a t t i t u d e and veloc i t y p u r s u i t g u i d a n c e laws, r e s p e c t i v e l y . In the former, a wide angle t a r g e t sensor is r e q u i r e d s i n c e i t is t y p i c a l l y mechanized t o b e body f i x e d . I n t h e l a t t e r , a narrower f i e l d - o f - v i e w (FOV) sens o r may b e u t i l i z e d a s a r e s u l t of t h e d e c o u p l i n g o f t h e body from t h e sensor mount as p r e v i o u s l y i s t h e forward guidance d e s c r i b e d . I n each c a s e , g a i n , and i t w i l l d i f f e r f o r each as w i l l t h e fcedback damping g a i n K R . The guidance f i l t e r i n F i g u r e 5 i n d i c a t e s t h a t h i g h e r guidance g a i n i n t h e v e l o c i t y p u r s u i t law r e q u i r e s some smoothing t o i n h i b i t n o i s e o f t h e t a r g e t sensor o p t i c s and i t s associated electronics.
VELOCITY PURSUIT
PROPORTIONAL
12
16
d
F i g u r e 6 , Performance of C l a s s i c a l Guidance Laws f o r a Given Heading E r r o r a t F i r s t T a r g e t Acquisition
100
80
60
VELOCITY PURSUIT
40
Downloaded by Beihang University (CNPIEC - XI'AN BRANCH) on April 24, 2013 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-59
20
0
0
10
20
30
40
60
loo 90
7
=58 ' s
Clemow (1960) g i v e s a n o t h e r b a s i c d e r i v a t i o n o f PNC, w h i l e Pitman (1972) compiled s e n s i t i v i t y f u n c t i o n s and p r o j e c t e d errors f o r P N G w i t h gains o f 2 , 3, and 4. C a l c u l a t i o n s o f t e r m i n a l homing p a r a m e t e r s were made by Rawlings (1970). I n a 1971 p a p e r , Rawlings c o n s i d e r e d t h e e f f e c t s o f s a t u r a t i n g aerodynamic s u r f a c e s on t r a j e c t o r i e s flown w i t h PNG. Many a u t h o r s have c o n s i d e r e d augmenting P N G to a c c o u n t f o r t a r g e t a c c e l e r a t i o n s . Arbenz (1970) c o n s i d e r e d making t h e c l o s i n g v e l o c i t y h e a d i n g r a t e p r o p o r t i o n a l t o LOS r a t e and developed a c l o s e d form e x p r e s s i o n f o r a m o d i f i e d P N G law. Siouris (1974) added an e s t i m a t e of t a r g e t a c c e l e r a t i o n t o t h e missile a c c e l e r a t i o n command t o y i e l d an augmented P N G law. Guelman used g e o m e t r i c arguments t o g i v e t h e s t r u c t u r e of t h e m i s s i l e t r a j e c t o r y ; h e showed i n 1971 t h a t P N G w i l l a l m o s t always r e s u l t i n an intercept f o r a constant v e l o c i t y t a r g e t i n 1972. F o r c o n s t a n t t a r g e t a c c e l e r a t i o n s , q u a l i t a t i v e t r a j e c t o r i e s were d e t e r m i n e d and t a r g e t a c q u i s i t i o n boundaries assessed. I n 1976 Cuelman cons i d e r e d t h e s t r u c t u r e o f t r a j e c t o r i e s under t m e p r o p o r t i o n a l n a v i g a t i o n g u i d a n c e (TPNG), where t h e commanded a c c e l e r a t i o n is normal t o t h e LOS r a t h e r t h a n the m i s s i l e v e l o c i t y . I n t h i s work h e showed t h a t TPNG r e s u l t s i n i n t e r c e p t o n l y if the i n i t i a l c o n d i t i o n s l i e i n a w e l l d e f i n e d S u b s e t of t h e N G for parameter space. S h i n a r (1976) c o n s i d e r e d P a r o l l i n g missile where h e c o n s i d e r e d t h e crossc o u p l i n g between roll and t h e c o n t r o l system. S l a t e r and Wells (1973) s t u d i e d o p t i m a l e v a s i v e tactics against a P N G missile, incorporating a lag i n t o t h e m i s s i l e dynamics, and g e n e r a t e d two S t r a t e g i e s based upon d i f f e r e n t o p t i m a l i t y c r i t e r i a . A comprehensive s t u d y o f c l a s s i c a l (PNG) and o p t i mal c o n t r o l t e c h n i q u e s f o r t e r m i n a l homing of CNc i f o r m and b a n k - t o - t u r n s t e e r i n g m i s s i l e s was performed by B a l b i r n i e , S h e p o r a i t i s , and Eferriam (1975). P N G i s a guidance l a w of t h e m i s s i l e f l i g h t p a t h t o t h e a n g u l a r LOS r a t e o f s i m p l i s t i c a l l y i n Figure 9
case.
Y
FLIGHTPATH
80 . CONTROL AUTHORITY
70
60
50 40 20
PROPORTIONAL 0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
F i g u r e 9.
Geometry of F l i g h t P a t h
The geometry o f F i g u r e 9 s u g g e s t s
F i g u r e 8. Performance o f C l a s s i c a l Guidance Laws f o r a Given T a r g e t A c c e l e r a t i o n Commencing 5 sec B e f o r e Impact P r o p o r t i o n a l N a v i g a t i o n Guidance Adler (1956) p r o v i d e d one of t h e seminal papers i n t h e area, c o n s i d e r i n g P N G i n t h r e e dimensions. Adler p r o v i d e s a r e a d a b l e development of t h e t h e o r y u s i n g v e c t o r c a l c u l u s , whereas most s u b s e q u e n t a u t h o r s have c o n s i d e r e d o n l y t h e p l a n a r case f o r s i m p l i f i c a t i o n . Murtaugh and C r i e l ( 1 9 6 6 ) p r o v i d e d a n o t h e r fundamental p a p e r d e v e l o p i n g three-dimensional P N G f o r a s a t e l l i t e rendezvous problem.
where yH r e p r e s e n t s f l i g h t p a t h a n g l e r e l a t i v e t o
a f i x e d reference, h r e p r e s e n t s the LOS r e l a t i v e t o a f i x e d r e f e r e n c e , and N i s t h e n a v i g a t i o n r a t i o . A g e n e r a l e x p r e s s i o n f o r m i s s i l e a c c e l e r a t i o n may
he written
7 = VMfMR+ VMT
where q r e p r e s e n t s t o t a l m i s s i l e a c c e l e r a t i o n ; T ~ t ,h e missile f l i g h t
( 6)
VM, t h e m i s s i l e s p e e d ;
p a t h angle;
VMl,
a u n i t vector l a t e r a l t o the
I /
where 0
u n i t s o f g ' s and E r e p r e s e n t s t h e LOS e r r o r which is measured by a seeker h a v i n g a time lag c o n s t a n t of T sec and an e r r o r o f d. The symbol k r e p r e s e n t s a guidance g a i n f a c t o r . By n o t i n g t h a t a c o n s t a n t b e a r i n g c o u r s e i s d e t e r m i n e d i f m i s s i l e and t a r g e t are f l y i n g cons t a n t speed and n e i t h e r i s maneuvering, i t may be c o n c l u d e d t h a t the LOS a t each i n s t a n t o f t i m e would be p a r a l l e l t o t h e LOS a t a p r e v i o u s i n s t a n t . L a t e r a l l y p e r t u r b i n g t h e c o l l i s i o n c o u r s e noted by t a r g e t and m i s s i l e p o s i t i o n s X and respecti.vely T y i e l d s Z and Z which may be i n t e g r a t e d t o y i e l d M T the missile trajectory using proportional navigation:
2
Bryson, Denham, and Dreyfus (1963); Denham and Bryson (1964) ; and D e n h a m (1964) were among t h e f i r s t t o c o n s i d e r o p t i m i z a t i o n techniques In a series a p p l i e d t o m i s s i l e guidance problems. of p a p e r s t h e y f o r m u l a t e d and s o l v e d t h e o p t i m a l c o n t r o l problem with i n e q u a l i t y c o n s t r a i n t s , and then a p p l i e d t h e r e s u l t t o t h e t r a j e c t o r y shaping o f a s u r f a c e - t o - s u r f a c e missile f o r range maximization. S r a l l a r d (1968) gave a good t u t o r i a l review of c l a s s i c a l and modern methods f o r homing i n t e r c e p t o r I n an e a r l i e r paper (1966), h e d e a l t missiles. w i t h an a u t o p i l o t d e s i g n . I n a 1972 p a p e r , h e a p p l i e d d i s c r e t e o p t i m a l control t o a m i s s i l e system w i t h u n d e s i r a b l e s t a b i l i t y c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s , and t h e n modified t h e dynamics t o y i e l d a new problem w i t h more d e s i r a b l e c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s .
Downloaded by Beihang University (CNPIEC - XI'AN BRANCH) on April 24, 2013 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-59
Td ZM dt 2
dZM
gkTX
+ -d =t -
~(3)
t=o
An e x c e l l e n t r e v i e w of d e t e r m i n i s t i c o p t i m a l c o n t r o l and i t s a p p l i c a t i o n s , w i t h an e x t e n s i v e b i b l i o g r a p h y , i s found i n an IEEE p a p e r by Athans (1966). Another e x c e l l e n t review w i t h e x t e n s i v e references is i n B 1965 A I A A p a p e r by Paiewonsky. Kokotovic and Rutman (1965) provided a s u r v e y of s e n s i t i v i t y methods drawing h e a v i l y upon S o v i e t literacure.
Some e a r l y a u t h o r s , i n a n a t t e m p t t o j u s t i f y t h e r e s u l t i n g guidance laws achieved v i a l i n e a r o p t i m a l c o n t r o l , showed t h a t t h e i r r e s u l t s were an e x t e n s i o n of PNG. Axelband and Hardy (1969, 1970) used l i n e a r o p t i m a l c o n t r o l t o develop what t h e y c a l l e d quasi-optimum PNG. As w i t h a l m o s t a l l l i n e a r o p t i m a l schemes, time-to-go i s r e q u i r e d f o r implementation. Lee (1969) d e s c r i b e d s e v e r a l t e c h n i q u e s i n n o n l i n e a r c o n t r o l which extended t h e l i n e a r rcgul a t o r t h e o r y and d r e w h e a v i l y upon r e c e n t d i s s e r t a t i o n s a t t h e U n i v e r s i t y o f Minnesota. Deyst and P r i c e (1973) used l i n e a r dynamics w i t h a p l a n a r engagement t o develop o p t i m a l c o n t r o l laws where the t a r g e t a c c e l e r a t i o n was a f i r s t o r d e r Markov p r o c e s s , and found t h a t t h e s a t u r a t i o n of c o n c r o l s u r f a c e s was an i m p o r t a n t f a c t o r i n modeling a maneuver l i m i t e d m i s s i l e . Nazaroff (1976) f o m l a t e d an I Q G approach i n which h e assumed e x t r e m e l y s i m p l i f i e d m i s s i l e dynamics b u t i n c l u d e d t a r g e t a c c e l e r a t i o n and j e r k terms. Stockum and Wiener (1976) assumed exponent i a l l y correlated t a r g e t accelerations i n generati n g an I Q G guidance law. The feedback t h e y o b t a i n e d on p r o j e c t e d m i s s d i s t a n c e and r a t e was analogous t o t i m e - v a r y i n g PNG. They compared t h e i r guidance N G law. scheme a g a i n s t an augumented P Asher and Matuseewski (1974) c o n s i d e r e d t h e o p t i m a l c o n t r o l problem where t a r g e t a c c e l e r a t i o n was accounted f o r a s an e x t e r n a l d i s t u r b a n c e , r e s u l t i n g i n a t r a c k i n g f o m l a t i o n of t h e regulat o r problem. They c o n s t r a i n e d t h e f i n a l miss d i s t a n c e t o be z e r o b u t , t o a c h i e v e t h i s , needed t o know t h e t a r g e t a c c e l e r a t i o n h i s t o r y p r e c i s e l y .
The p e r f o r m a w e and implementation of t h e g u i d a n c e l a w are b e s t a p p r e c i a t e d i n t h e i r r e l a t i o n s h i p t o t w o o t h e r guidance laws which are s i m i l a r i n i n t h a t no r e q u i r e m e n t i s e s t a b l i s h e d f o r range o r range r a t e i n f o r m a t i o n . V e l o c i t y p u r s u i t and a t t i t u d e p u r s u i t a r e i n t h i s c a t e g o r y w i t h PNG. The p e r f o r m a n c e i s i n d i c a t e d i n F i g u r e s 6 , 7 , and 6.
O p t i m a l L i n e a r Guidance
'4
S i n c e the mid-1960's t h e m i s s i l e g u i d a n c e l i t e r a t u r e h a s become i n c r e a s i n g l y permeated by t e c h n i q u e s based upon o p t i m a l c o n t r o l . The g r e a t s u c c e s s found by l i n e a r - q u a d r a t i c r e g u l a t o r t h e o r y a i d i t s d u a l a n a l o g , Kalman f i l t e r i n g , p l u s t h e a t t r a c t i v e and e a s i l y determined form of a f c e d back s o l u t i o n h a s l e d t o a l m o s t a l l work i n t h i s a r e a b e i n g based upon l i n e a r model dynamics, w i t h q u a d r a t i c c o s t s and a d d i t i v e G a u s s i a n n o i s e (LQG). Most f o r m u l a t i o n s c o n s i d e r t e r m i n a l m i s s d i s t a n c e and r u n n i n g c o n t r o l e f f o r t o n l y i n t h e c o s t funct i o n a l . Unlike the S t a n d a r d r e g u l a t o r f o r m a t , a r u n n i n g c o s t on t h e s t a t e i s g e n e r a l l y n o t approp r i a t e i n t h i s framework. The g e n e r a l o p t i m i z a t i o n problem t h e n becomes
' 4
B a l b i m i e , S h e p o r a i t i s , and Merriam (1975) g a v e a means t o o b t a i n w e i g h t i n g m a t r i c e s which r e s u l t i n " c l a s s i c a l type" c o n t r o l g a i n s i n an LQG f o r m u l a t i o n . S h e p o r a i t i s , B a l b i r n i e , and L i e b n e r (1976) c o n s i d e r e d a q u a d r a t i c c o s t on t h e a n g l e of a t t a c k . They used a second o r d e r Newton-Raphson scheme t o s o l v e t h e r e s u l t i n g o p t i m i z a t i o n problem. Speyer (1976) a p p l i e d h i s l i n e a r - e x p o n e n t i a l Gaussian (LEG) c o n t r o l l e r t o a t e r m i n a l guidance problem. R a t h e r t h a n minimizing t h e e x p e c t a t i o n o f a q u a d r a t i c form J 2 (as g i v e n p r e v i o u s l y ) , ~ p e y e r ' sLEG f o r m u l a t i o n minimizes E ,ex,(lt,J where p i s a scalar. The dynamical model i s a g a i n l i n e a r . Speyer used a Kalman f i l t e r t o o b t a i n e s t i m a t e s of S t a t e v a r i a b l e s f o r feedback. H i s c o n t r o l l e r did not enjoy a separation p r i n c i p a l ; c o n t r o l g a i n s depended upon the f i l t e r s t a t e c o v a r i a n c e . S p e y e r ' s LEG c o s t f u n c t i o n a l had t h e e f f e c t of v e r y h e a v i l y weighing l a r g e e x c u r s i o n s and t h u s reduced t h e t a i l s of t h e t e r m i n a l m i s s distribution. Youngblood (1977) used v e r y s i m p l i f i e d l i n e a r dynamics t o compute i n n e r launch boundaries. Youngblood's r e p o r t c o n t a i n s a d e s c r i p t i o n of t h e F l e t c h e r - P o w e l l f u n c t i o n a l o p t i m i z a t i o n method. F i s k e developed a number of guidance and e s t i m a t i o n schemes based upon LQG f o r m u l a t i o n s w i t h v a r y i n g d e g r e e s of model complexity. The c l o s e d form s o l u t i o n s f o r t h e c o n t r o l l e r s are g i v e n i n t h e r e p o r t , a l l o w i n g one t o examine t h e e f f e c t of model p a r a m e t e r s on t h e g a i n s . F i s k e also p r e s e n t s a s t o c h a s t i c guidance law, wherein the t a r g e t a c c e l e r a t i o n i s assumed t o be a f i r s t o r d e r system d r i v e n by w h i t e n o i s e . In a d d i t i o n , a n o n l i n e a r law, based upon n u l l i n g p r o j e c t e d miss d i s t a n c e over a s i n g l e c o n t r o l i n t e r v a l was given. York and P a s t r i c k (1977) looked a t t h e problem of minimizing t h e t e r m i n a l m i s s d i s t a n c e and t h e d e v i a t i o n of t h e m i s s i l e from a d e s i r e d o r i e n t a t i o n a t t h e f i n a l t i m e . A f o w l a t i o n was g i v e n f o r a s y s t e m t h a t had f i n i t e time d e l a y . In f a c t , t h e i n c r e a s e and d e c r e a s e i n time d e l a y had i n t e r e s t i n g r a m i f i c a t i o n s on t h e s o l u t i o n . The a n g l e of a t t a c k assumption was i n v e s t i g a t e d a n d , a l t h o u g h n o t s o l v e d a n a l y t i c a l l y i n c l o s e d form, t h e system was derived. For completeness, t h e f o l l o w i n g example summ a r i z e s a t y p i c a l o p t i m a l c o n t r o l law f o - l a t i o n . The geometry of t h e t a c t i c a l m i s s i l e - t a r g e t p o s i t i o n i s g i v e n i n F i g u r e 1 0 . Assume t h a t t h e a n g l e o f a t t a c k i s s m a l l and t h u s can be n e g l e c t e d ( t h i s assumption w i l l be c o n s i d e r e d l a t e r ) , and choose t h e f a l l o w i n g set o f v a r i a b l e s :
AL i s t h e l a t e r a l a c c e l e r a t i o n o f t h e m i s s i l e ;
0 is t h e body a t t i r u d e angle of the missile;
and
a is t h e a n g l e of a t t a c k of t h e m i s s i l e shown i n
F i g u r e 10.
Downloaded by Beihang University (CNPIEC - XI'AN BRANCH) on April 24, 2013 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-59
CO,
are time-varying c o e f f i -
c i e n t s chosen t o minimize t h e c o s t f u n c t i o n a l tf
L /
J = Yd(tf)
yB(tf)
+B
0
u2(t)dt
(12)
For t h e case where t h e a n g l e o f a t t a c k p r o b a b l y c a n n o t be ignored e . g . , f o r t h e l a r g e r t a c t i c a l missile, t h e system of e q u a t i o n s should i n c l u d e t h e a n g l e of a t t a c k a. I n a d d i t i o n , because i t i s f e a s i b l e t o a c h i e v e o n l y a small a n g l e of a t t a c k a t impact, a r e a s o n a b l e performance index t o be minimized would seem t o he
t
f u2(t)dt.
2 J = clYd(tf)
+ c2e2 ( t f ) + c3a2 ( t f ) + c4
to
(13)
The performance o b t a i n a b l e from t h e o p t i m a l guidance l a w formulated and s i m u l a t e d f o r E q u a t i o n (13) was comparabla and even b e t t e r t h a n t h e P N G law i n terms of m i s s d i s t a n c e . A d d i t i o n a l l y , it had t h e added f e a t u r e of meeting a c o n s t r a i n t o r t h e impact a n g l e which t h e F'NG law c o u l d n o t achieve. I n p a r t i c u l a r t h e impact a n g l e was shown v i a s i m u l a t i o n on a n a l l - d i g i t a l 6-DOF m i s s i l e s i m u l a t i o n t o be w i t h i n 1 deg of t h e d e s i r e d impact a n g l e and w i t h i n 1 f t of t h e d e s i r e d m i s s d i s t a n c e . O t h e r r e s e a r c h e r s have c o r r o b o r a t e d t h e s e r e s u l t s .
where Yd is t h e p o s i t i o n v a r i a b l e from t h e m i s s i l e
t o t h e t a r g e t p r o j e c t e d on t h e ground; p o s i t i o n v a r i a b l e of t h e t a r g e t ;
Yt is the
Ym is t h e
Downloaded by Beihang University (CNPIEC - XI'AN BRANCH) on April 24, 2013 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-59
time-to-go. T y p i c a l l y , a n e s t i m a t e o f t h e range between t h e t a r g e t and m i s s i l e , and t h e r a t e o f change of t h i s range are o b t a i n e d from r a d a r or o t h e r r a n g i n g d e v i c e s ; t h e time-to-go e s t i m a t e is t h e n c a l c u l a t e d . T h i s e s t i m a t e works q u i t e w e l l as l o n g a s t h e range and r a n g e - r a t e i n f o r m a t i o n a r e a c c u r a t e . I n many i n s t a n c e s , however, t h e d a t a are contaminated by n o i s e e i t h e r c o v e r t l y , as i n t h e c a s e o f r a d a r j a m i n g d e v i c e s , or by t h e proc e s s i n g e l e c t r o n i c s . T h i s a d v e r s e l y impacts the e s t i m a t e of time-to-go and t h e o p t i m a l c o n t r o l law, and m i s s i l e performance s u f f e r s . P a s t r i c k and Yark (1977) p r e s e n t a d i s c u s s i o n of s e v e r a l a s p e c t s o f t h e problem i n t h e c o n t e x t of a r e a l i s t i c a p p l i c a t i o n and p r o v i d e a n a l y t i c computer a l g o r i t h m s f o r i t s s o l u t i o n , as w e l l as a closed-form r e s u l t . Another more r e c e n t a t t e m p t t o e s t i m a t e t i m e - t o - g o was made by F i s k e . He also a d d r e s s e s t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f o b t a i n i n g t h i s v a r i a b l e by a n i n t e n s i t y r a n g i n g technique. Another d i f f i c u l t y w i t h o p t i m a l g u i d a n c e laws i s t h e i r s e n s i t i v i t y t o i n i t i a l c o n d i t i o n s , as shown by York (1978). The p r i m a r y message t h e r e i n i s t h e s t r o n g need f o r a c c u r a t e modeling of t h e s y s t e m and the importance of the s e l e c t i o n of numerical q u a n t i t i e s f o r t h e e l e m e n t s of t h e weighti n g m a t r i c e s i n t h e performance index. O t h e r Guidance Schemes Whiting and Jobe (1972) c o n s i d e r e d u s i n g a " v i r t u a l t a r g e t " approach t o g u i d a n c e f o r a s h o r t range a i r - t o - g r o u n d m i s s i l e . P o u l t e r and Anderson (1976) c o n s i d e r e d a nonl i n e a r d i f f e r e n t i a l game framework t o d e r i v e a n o p t i m a l s t e e r i n g l a w f o r a t e r m i n a l homing m i s s i l e . I n a p r i o r p a p e r , Anderson (1974) gave a method of u p d a t i n g a d i f f e r e n t i a l game s o l u t i o n v i a l i n e a r i z e d two-point boundary v;lue problems.
Mahmoud (1977) d e s c r i b e d a d u a l l e v e l , h i e r a r c h i c a l o p t i m i z a t i o n scheme based o n i n v a r i a n t imbedding which is u s e d t o o b t a i n approximate soluConnor t i o n s t o many n o n l i n e a r c o n t r o l problems. and Vlach (1977) p r e s e n t e d a new augmented p e n a l t y f u n c t i o n approach t o o p t i m a l c o n t r o l problems. T h e i r f o r m u l a t i o n i s a p p l i c a b l e t o f i n i t e dimens i o n a l o p t i m i z a t i o n problems with t e r m i n a l constraints. Lansing and B a t t i n (1965) p r e s e n t e d m c h background m a t e r i a l on random processes a p p l i e d t o a u t o m a t i c c o n t r o l . R a d b i l l and McCue (1970) prov i d e d background m a t e r i a l on q u a s i - l i n e a r i z a t i o n methods i n s o l v i n g c o u p l e d n o n l i n e a r two-Point boundary v a l u e problems. C h i n ' s book on m i s s i l e d e s i g n (1961) h a s a s e c t i o n on m i s s i l e t r a n s f e r f u n c t i o n s which i s v e r y u s e f u l i n a s s e s s i n g t h e c o n t r i b u t i o n of aerodynamic f a c t o r s and c o n t r o l s u r f a c e s t o m i s s i l e motion. G o o d s t e i n (1972) provided an overview of m i s s i l e c o n t r o l s y s t e m development and, i n t h e same AGAIU) r e p o r t , Acus (1972) p r e s e n t e d a d e s c r i p t i o n and comparison of i n e r t i a l guidance technology f o r tactical missiles.
111.
Discussion
A s u r v e y h a s been made of guidance laws a p p l i e d t o s h o r t range t a c t i c a l m i s s i l e s , and t h e y have been o r g a n i z e d i n t o f i v e c a t e g o r i e s f o r convenience of discussion. To b e t t e r p l a c e them i n r e l a t i v e p e r s p e c t i v e , F i g u r e 11 p r e s e n t s t h e hardware r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r mechanizing them. Though t h e c o n c e p t s are reasona b l y s e l f explanatory, i t should be noted t h a t t h e BR and CLOS c o n c e p t s are c o n f i g u r e d w i t h a f t sensor and o p t i c s w h i l e t h e o t h e r s are forward. Also, t h e o p t i m a l guidance scheme s u g g e s t s t h e need f o r a m i c r o p r o c e s s o r t o h a n d l e t h e more complex guidance algorithms. Guidance c o n c e p t depicted i n t h e Table o t h e r items t h a t show With t h e e x c e p t i o n of c o n f i g u r a t i o n comparisons f e a t u r e t h e r e l a t i v e c o s t and complexity and performance. t h e m i c r o p r o c e s s o r requirement
F o r background m a t e r i a l , Froning and G i e s e k i n g (1973) gave a d e s c r i p t i o n o f a u t o p i l o t s t e e r i n g mechanisms f o r b a n k - t o - t u r n m i s s i l e s . Gido, J a f f e , and Wilson (1974) p r o v i d e d computer programs t o produce a u t o p i l o t d e s i g n s u s i n g b o t h c l a s s i c a l (PNG) and modern (LQG) f o r m u l a t i o n s . George (1974) d i s c u s s e d t r e n d s i n IMU, g u i d a n c e and c o n t r o l hardware.
OPTICS
r8\
OPTICS
SENSOR AND
BODY
+MAIN FINS
BODY
F i g u r e 11.
I n s t r u m e n t a t i o n C o n f i g u r a t i o n Concepts
7
Downloaded by Beihang University (CNPIEC - XI'AN BRANCH) on April 24, 2013 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-59
3Nd
R. B . Asher and J . H. Matuzewski, "Optimal Guidance of F i n i t e Bandwidth Systems with Zero T e r m i n a l Miss," J o i n t Auto. C o n t r o l Cbnf., pp. 4-10, 1974. B. Asher and J. H. Matuzewski, "Optimal Guidance f o r Maneuvering T a r g e t s , " J. S p a c e c r a f t and Rockets, pp. 204-206, March 1974. R.
E . P. Cunningham, "Lambda M a t r i x Terminal C o n t r o l f o r M i s s i l e Guidance," J. S p a c e c r a f t and Rockets, pp. 119-121, Jan. 1968.
a Surface-toS u r f a c e Missile with I n - F l i g h t I n e a u a l i t v Cons t r a i n t s , " J. S p a c e c r a f t and R o c k e t s , pp. 78-83, Jan. 1964.
i/
Athans, "The S t a t u s o f Optimal C o n t r o l Theory and A p p l i c a t i o n s f o r D e t e r m i n i s t i c Systems," IEEE T r a n s . Auto. C o n t r o l , pp. 580-596, J u l y 1966.
M. M . Athans, "On Optimal A l l o c a t i o n and Guidance Laws
W. F . Denham and A . W. Bryson, J r . , "Optimal P m g r a m i n g Problems w i t h I n e q u a l i t y C o n s t r a i n t s 11: S o l u t i o n by S t e e p e s t D e s c e n t , " A I A A J o u r n a l , pp. 25-34, Jan. 1964. J . J . Deyst and C . F. P r i c e , "Optimal S t o c h a s t i c Guidance Laws f o r T a c t i c a l M i s s i l e s , " J . S p a c e c r a f t and R o c k e t s , pp. 301-308, May 1973.
R . E . Dickson and V . Garber, "Optimum Rendezvous, I n t e r c e p t and I n j e c t i o n , " A I A A Journal, pp. 1402-
for L i n e a r I n t e r c e p t i o n and Rendeivous Problems," IEEE T r a n s . Aerospace and E l e c t r o n i c Systems, pp. 843-853, S e p t . 1971.
Downloaded by Beihang University (CNPIEC - XI'AN BRANCH) on April 24, 2013 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-59
E . I. Axelband a n d F. W. Hardy, "Quasi Optimum Prop o r t i o n a l N a v i g a t i o n , " 2nd H a w a i i I n t . Conf. S y s . S c i e n c e s , pp. 417-421, 1969. E . I . Axelband and F. W. Hardv. "ODtima1 Feedback _ , . Missile Guidance," 3rd H a w a i i 1 C . Conf. Svs. S c i e n c e s , pp. 874-877, 1970.
E . C . B a l b i r n i e , L . P . S h e p o r a i t i s and C. W.
1403, J u l y 1969.
P . H. F i s k e , "Advanced D i g i t a l Guidance and C o n t r o l Concepts f o r A i r - t o - A i r T a c t i c a l M i s s i l e s , " The A n a l y t i c a l Sciences Corporation Technical Report, Dec. 1977.
Merriam, 'Werging C o n v e n t i o n a l and Optimal C o n t r o l Techniques f o r P r a c t i c a l M i s s i l e Terminal Guidance," A I A A Guidance and C o n t r o l Conf., A I A A p a p e r 75-1127, 1975.
G . B a s h e i n and C. P. Neuman, " L i n e a r Feedback Guidance f o r I n t e r c e D t i o n and Rendezvous i n a S t o c h a s t i c Environment," 1st H a w a i i I n t . Conf. Sys. S c i e n c e s , pp. 654-657, 1968.
H. D . Froning and D . L. G i e s e k i n g , "Bank t o Turn S t e e r i n g f o r Highly Maneuverable M i s s i l e s , " Guidance and C o n t r o l Conf., A I A A p a p e r , 73-860, 1973.
AIAA
S. M . B r a i n i n and R . B. McGhee, "Optimal B i a s e d P r o p o r t i o n a l N a v i g a t i o n , " IEEE Trans. Auto. C o n t r o l , pp. 440-442, Aug. 1968.
A. S . Bratus, "Approximate S o l u t i o n o f B e l l m a n ' s E q u a t i o n f o r a Class o f O p t i m a l Terminal S t a t e C o n t r o l Problems,'' J. ADpiied Math and Mechanics, Vol. 37, NO. 3 , pp. 396-407, 1973. A . E . Bryson, J r . , " A p p l i c a t i o n s o f Optimal C o n t r o l Theory i n Aerospace E n g i n e e r i n g , " 1 0 t h A I A A Minta Martin Memorial L e c t u r e , Cambridge, Mass., 1966. F . Denham and S. E . D r e y f u s , "Optimal P r o g r a m i n g Problems w i t h I n e q u a l i t y Cons t r a i n t s I: Necessary C o n d i t i o n s f o r E x t e r n a l S o l u t i o n s , " A I A A J o u r n a l , pp. 2544-2550, NO". 1963.
C . S . Chang, "A Terminal Guidance Theory Using Dynamic P r o g r a m i n g F o r m u l a t i o n , " A I A A J o u r n a l , pp. 912-916, May 1970.
A . A . C h i k r i i , "Nonlinear Problem of Evasion o f C o n t a c t with Terminal S e t of ComDlex S t r u c t u r e . " 3 . Applied Math and Mechanics, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 3-11, 1975. A . E . Bryson, J r . , W.
t i o n a l N a v i g a t i o n and Guidance Schemes," Advanced Problems and Methods f o r S p a c e f l i g h t O p t i m i z a t i o n , e d i t e d by B. F. d e Veubeke, Pergamon P r e s s , Oxford, pp. 13-24, 1969. L. C . George, "Missile Guidance and C o n t r o l System Design T r e n d s , " SAE N a t i o n a l A ~ ~ o s D E ~n g c i~ neering and Manuf. Meeting, S A 3 p a p e r 740873, 1974. J . F. Gido, R. C. J a f f e and R. 6 . Wilson, "Merging C o n v e n t i o n a l and Modern C o n t r o l Techniques f o r P r a c t i c a l Missile A u t o p i l o t Design," A I A A Mechanics and C o n t r o l o f F l i g h t Conf., A I A A p a p e r 74-911, 1974.
R . G o o d s t e i n , "Development of C o n t r o l System Requirements," AGARD Report: Guidance and C o n t r o l of Tact i c a l M i s s i l e s , May 1972.
i/
P . C. Gregory, P . B. T e e t s and B . 6 . Lee, "Guidance, N a v i g a t i o n and C o n t r o l , " Space/Aeronautics, pp. 6166, J u l y 1969.
K. V . G r i d e r , W. E . J o r d a n and M. K i m , "Suboptimal Guidance f o r A t t i t u d e Angle C o n s t r a i n e d F l i g h t T r a j e c t o r i e s , " 6 t h Hawaii l n t . Conf. Svs. S c i e n c e s , pp. 455-457, 1973.
S. S. Ch'in, M i s s i l e Confirnuration Design, McGrauH i l l , pp. 130-154, 1961. 3 . C l e m o w , M i s s i l e Guidance, Temple P r e s s U n l i m i t e d , London, 1960.
M. A. Connor and M. Vlach, "A New Augmented P e n a l t y F u n c t i o n T e c h n i q u e d f o r Optimal C o n t r o l Problems," J. O p t i m i z a t i o n Theory and A p p l i c a t i o n s , pp. 39-49, Jan. 1977.
u,
'<
M. Guelman, "Proportional Navigation with a Maneuvering Target," IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, pp. 364-371, May 1972. M. Guelman, "The Closed Form Solution of True Proportional Navigation," IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic System, pp. 472-482, July 1976. G. L. Harmon, K. E. Kent and W. P. Purcell, "Optimal Bang-Bang Guidance System," Western Electric Show and Convention, Part 5, paper 19.1, 1962.
M. H. Liu and K. W. Han, "Model Reduction of a Nonlinear Control System," J . Spacecraft and Rockets, pp. 786-788, Dec. 1975.
Y. C. Ho, "Optimal Terminal Maneuver and Evasion Strategy," SIAM J. Control, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 421428, 1966.
Y. C. Ho, A. E. Bryson, J r . and S. Baron, "Differential Games and Optimal Pursuit-Evasion Strategies," IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, pp. 385-389, Oct. 1965.
R. M. Howe, "Guidance," Chapter 19 appearing in
Downloaded by Beihang University (CNPIEC - XI'AN BRANCH) on April 24, 2013 | http://arc.aiaa.org | DOI: 10.2514/6.1979-59
J. F. Muller, "Synthesis of a Guidance System for a System Engineering Handbook, ed. by R. E. Machol, Short Range Infantry Missile," J. Spaceciaft and W. P. Tanner. Jr. and S. N. Alexander. McGraw-Hill. , pp. 314-317, March 1969. NY 1965. S. A. Murtaugh and H. E. Criel, "Fundamentals of S. S. Hu and M. L. Thompson, "A Direct and Analyti- Proportional Navigation," IEEE Spectrum, pp. 75-85, Dec. 1966. cal Solution for Space Flight Guidance Functions," AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meetins, 1966. N. Nagarajin, "Discrete Optimal Control Approach to L. A. Irish, "A Basic Control Equation for Rendeza Four Dimensional Guidance Problem Near Terminal vous Terminal Guidance," IRE Trans. Aerospace and Areas," Int. J . Control, pp. 277-288, Aug. 1974. Navigational Electronics, pp. 106-113, Sept. 1961. G. J . Nazaroff, "An Optimal Terminal Guidance Law," IEEE Trans. Auto. Control, pp. 407-408, June 1976. W. H. Ito and J. E. Tushie, "P-Matrix Guidance," AIAA/ION Astrodvnamics Guidance and Control Conf., Aug. 1964. N. J. Niemi, "Investigation of a Terminal Guidance System for Satellit; Rendezvous," AIAA Journal, i J A. Ivanov, "Radar Guidance of Missiles," IEEE Inter- pp. 405-411, Feb. 1963. national Conf., pp. 321-335, 1975. B. Paiewonsky, "Optimal Control: A Review of Theory J. E. Kain and D. J . Yost, "Command to Line-ofand Practice," AIAA Journal, pp. 1985-2006, Nov. Sight Guidance: A Stochastic Optimal Control 1965. Problem," AIAA Guidance and Control Conf., AIAA H. L. Pastrick, "Filtering Inertial System Errors to paper 76-1956, 1976. Improve Terminal Sector Navigation," Proc. SouthJ. E. Kain and D. J . Yost. "Tareet Estimation in an eastern Symp. SYS. Theory, 1974. ECM Environment," J . Spacecraft and Rockets, pp H. L. Pastrick and R. J . York, "On the Determination 492-498, AUg. 1975. of Unspecified t , in a Guided Missile Optimal ConM. Kim and I:. V. Grider, "Terminal Guidance for trol Law Application," Proc. 1977 IEEE Conference on Impact Attitude Angle Constrained Flight TrajecDecision and Control, 1977. tories," IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic pp. 852-859, Nov. 1973. C. Pfeiffer, "A Successive Approximation Technique for Constructing a Near-Optimum Guidance Law," P. V. Kokotovic and R. S. Rutman, "Sensitivity of Astronautical Conf.. Astrodynamics, Guidance and Automatic Control Systems (Survey) , ' I Automation and Control. Miscellanea, pp. 285-291, 1967. Remote Control, pp. 727-749, April 1965.
u,
in Automatic Control, McGrav-Hill, pp. 239-247, 1965. E. B. Lee, "Recent Development in the Theory of Optimal Control and Their Application," Proc. Technical Seminar on Guidance and Control, Huntsville, Alabama, Aug. 1969.
I . Lee, "Optimal Trajectory, Guidance and Conjugate
D. L. Pitman, "Adjoint Solutions to Intercept Guidance," AGARC Report: Guidance and Control of Tactical Missiles, May 1972.
J. E . Potter, "A Guidance-Navigation Separation Theorem," AIAA/ION Astrdynamics Guidance and Control Conf., Aug. 1964.
R. A . Poulter and G. M. Anderson, "A Guidance Concept for Air-to-Air Missiles Based on Nonlinear Differential Game Theory," National Aerospace Electronics Conf., pp. 605-9, 1976.
10
D. V.
S t a l l a r d , "Discrete O p t i c a l Terminal Control w i t h A p p l i c a t i o n t o M i s s i l e Guidance," J o i n t Auto. C o n t r o l Conf., pp. 499-508, 1972. A. M . S t e i n b e r g and K. Shmueli, "On t h e Terminal C o n t r o l Problem," J . O p t i m i z a t i o n Theory and A p p l i Vo1. 11, pp. 313-320, March 1973. A , R. Stubberud, "Theory of P i t c h S t e e r i n g f o r Ascent Guidance," N a t . Space N a v i g a t i o n Meetin%, pp. 136-160, March 1967.
a ,
' U
E . R . Rane. "A Comnent o n Closed-Looo Ontimal Guidance Systems,'' IEEE T r a n s . Auto. C o n t r o l , pp. 616617, J u l y 1966.
I , L .
J .
L. A. Stockum and F . C . Weimer, "Optimal and Subo p t i m a l Guidance f o r a Short-Range Homing Missile," IEEE T r a n s . Aerospace and E l e c t r o n i c Systems, pp. 355-360, May 1976.
A. I. T a l k i n , 'Iloming by S t e e p e s t Descent," T r a n s . Auto. C o n t r o l , pp. 136-137, Jan. 1966.
IEEE
A. G . Rawling, "Nonlinear ProNav and t h e Minimum Time t o Turn," J. S p a c e c r a f t and Rockets, pp. 198201, F e b m a r y 1971.
W. Templeman, " L i n e a r i z e d I m p u l s i v e Guidance Laws," A I A A J o u r n a l , pp. 2148-2149, Nov. 1965. L. Teng and P. L. P h i p p s , " A p p l i c a t i o n of N o n l i n e a r F i l t e r t o S h o r t Range Missile Guidance," & N a t i o n a l Aerospace E l e c t r o n i c s Conf , pp. 439-449, 1967.
R. W. Rishel, "Optimal Terminal Guidance o f An Air t o S u r f a c e M i s s i l e , " A I A A Guidance. C o n t r o l and F l i s h t Dynamics C o n f e r e n c e , Aug. 1967. D. M . Salman and W. Heine, "Reachable S e t s A n a l y s i s An E f f i c i e n t Techniaue f o r P e r f o r m i n a I n t e r c e D . tor ./ Sensor T r a d e o f f S t u d i e s , " A I A A Guidance and C o n t r o l Conf., A I A A p a p e r 72-825, 1972.
R. Thibodeau and J . B.
S h a m . "PDM C o n t r o l A n a l v s i s Using the Phase P l a n e , " J. S p a c e c r a f t and Rockets, pp. 1054-1057, sept. 1969.
I ,
C. E . S e a l and A. R . S t u b b e r u d , " F i n a l Value C o n t r o l Systems," a p p e a r i n g i n Advances i n C o n t r o l Systems Theory and A p p l i c a t i o n , Vol. 8 , pp. 23-52, 1971.
F. Tung, "An Optimal D i s c r e t e C o n t r o l S t r a t e g y f o r T e r m i n a l Guidance," J o i n t Auto. C o n t r o l Conf., pp. 499-507, 1965. J. T. Wagner and D . F. M c A l l i s t e r , " S i m p l i f i e d Performance A n a l y s i s of Space and Missile Guidance," American A s t r o n a u t i c a l S o c i e t y and ORSA, J u n e 1969.
L . P. S h e p o r a i t i s , E. C . B a l b i r n i e and G . A . L i e b n e r , " P r a c t i c a l Optimal S t e e r i n g f a r Missile Terminai Guidance," AIM Guidance a i d C o n t r o l Canf., A I A A p a p e r 76-1917, 1976.
J . S h i n a r , "Divergence Range o f Homing M i s s i l e s , " Israel J . T e c h n o h a , pp. 47-55, Vol. 1 4 , 1976.
G . M. S i o u r i s , "Comparison Between P r o p o r t i o n a l and Augmented P r o p o r t i o n a l N a v i g a t i o n , " Nachrichtent e c h n i s c h e Z e i t s c h r i f t , pp. 278-280, J u l y 1974. 6. L. S l a t e r and W. R. W e l l s , "Optimal E v a s i v e T a c t i c s A g a i n s t a ProNav M i s s i l e with Time Delay," J. S p a c e c r a f t and Rockets, pp. 309-313, May 1973.
K . Smith, " A Comparison of t h e C o n t r o l Problems of Missiles and Manned A i r c r a f t , " J. Royal A e r o n a u t i c a l pp. 177-185, March 1962.
R. S. Warren, C . F . P r i c e , A. G e l b , and W. E . VanderVelde, " D i r e c t S t a t i s t i c a l E v a l u a t i o n of Nonl i n e a r Guidance Systems ,Iq A I A A Guidance and C o n t r o l Conf., A I A A p a p e r 73-836, 1973.
J. H. Whiting and J . W. Tube, " V i r t u a l T a r g e t S t e e r ins A Unique A i r - t o - A i r S u r f a c e M i s s i l e T a r s e t i n s a n : Guidance Technique," A I A A Guidance and Control' Conf., A I A A paper 72-826, 1972.
T. W. 3. Wong, "Guidance Systems f o r A i r - t o - A i r Missiles," INTERAVIA, pp. 1525-1528, Nov. 1961. J. Youngblood, "Optimal Guidance of A i r - t o - A i r M i s s i l e , " U n i v e r s i t y o f Alabama R e p o r t , NO". 1977.
u,
J . L. S p e y e r , "An Adaptive Terminal Guidance Scheme Based on an E x p o n e n t i a l C o s t C r i t e r i o n w i t h Applicat i o n t o Homing M i s s i l e Guidance," IEEE T r a n s . Auto. Control, pp. 371-375, June 1976.
R. J . York and H. L. P a s t r i c k , "Optimal Terminal Guidance w i t h C o n s t r a i n t s a t F i n a l T i m e , " , J . Spacec r a f t and R o c k e t s , pp. 381, June 1977.
R. J. York, "Optimal C o n t r o l f o r a n Anti-Tank Weapon," F i n a l R e p o r t , U . S . Army MIRADCOM C o n t r a c t No. DAAK 70-78-M-0102, September 1978.
J. L . S p e y e r , "A S t o c h a s t i c D i f f e r e n t i a l Game w i t h
C o n t r o l l a b l e S t a t i s t i c a l P a r a m e t e r s , " IEEE T r a n s . Sys. S c i e n c e s and C y b e r n e t i c s , pp. 17-20, June 1967.
D. V . S t a l l a r d , "A M i s s i l e Adaptive R o l l A u t o p i l o t w i t h a New Dither P r i n c i p l e , " IEEE T r a n s . Auto. , pp. 368-378, J u l y 1966. D. V. S t a l l a r d , " C l a s s i c a l and Modern Guidance of Homing I n t e r c e p t o r M i s s i l e s , " Raytheon Co. R e p o r t , 1968.
11