Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Function of soils
1)Medium for plant production 3) Material cycles
(Brady 2001)
5)Engineering medium
Wastewater Aggregate
Composition of Soil minerals (clay, silt, sand, gravel) organic matters (humus, organic residues) organisms
High specific surface area High variation of : - size of particles - physical and chemical properties (hydrophilic/phobic, ion exchange capacity,aerobic/anaerobic, etc) - species of microorganisms
SO42NH4+
Number
(individuals/m2)
Size
(m)
Biomass
(g/m2)
It was estimated that microorganisms with more than 100 million in population and several thousands of species live in 1-g of soil (Trosvik 1990).
Soil trench
In the U.S.A., about 30% of households, where they treat wastewater individually at their home, use this type of system.
Figure: Septic tank - Soil trench system for domestic wastewater treatment.
N2
N2
Gravitational flow
Gravitational flow
Plastic tray Sand Inlet pipe Gravel Plastic net Covering Sand
Humic Substance Clay Silt Sand (2) Adsorption : Contaminants (Organic substances, N, P)
Principle of purifying mechanisms of soil is the same with that of the trickling filter method.
Table: Comparison between Trench-type Wastewater treatment method using Soil and Trickling Filter Method
Purifying Method using Soil Trickling Filter Method 102 m2/m3
Specific Surface Area Pore Active Al, Fe, Loading Rate Loading Rate per Specific Surface Area
(Wakatsuki, 1997)
Humic Substance
(3) Leaching
NO3 : Pollutants (Organic matters, N, P)
(1) Low permeability of soil = require large land area (2) Clogging - small pore size - high organisms activity (3) Saturation of adsorption - active Al/Fe for P -humic substances for hydro-phobic materials (4)Nitrate leaching - preferential flow - shortage of C source for denitrification - lack of anaerobic condition
1.0 0.8
1.0 1.6
Saturated Hydraulic 9.8 9.6 3.2 1.1 1.8 0.1 -3 -4 -3 -3 Conductivity (cm/sec) x 10 x 10 x 10 x 10 x 10-4
Coarse particles
Very high specific surface area Very low permeability comparing to coarse materials
Clogging a) can be recovered by keeping the soil aerobic with no wastewater loading for a few months.
Clay Inorganic SS
b) Clogging by clay dispersion and deposition including biofilm, inorganic and organic SS
Table: General Physical and Chemical Properties of Sandy Soil, Volcanic ash Soil and Red Clayey Soil
Sandy soil Volcanic ash soil Red clayey soil pH (H2O ) pH (KCl) Particle size Composition (%) CoarseSand (2 to 0.2 mm ) Fine Sand (to 0.02 mm ) Silt (to 0.0002 mm ) Clay (0.0002 mmor less) Total Organic Carbon (%) Total Nitrogen (%) C/N Ratio Effective Cation Exchange Capacity (cmol(+)/kg soil) Active Fe (%) ActiveAl (%) PhosphoricAcid Adsorption Coefficient (mgP2O5/100 g soil) 5.9 3.7 4.9 4.3 4.8 3.7
70.5 20.2 1.6 7.7 0.04 0.004 10 10.3 0.28 0.09 342
14.1 49.5 19.6 16.8 8.21 0.355 23 7.63 0.6 5.63 2410
1.3 8.2 32.3 58.2 0.22 0.034 6 39.36 4.51 2.53 1560
Water permeability
P removal capacity
Low permeability
> need large area > Risk of clogging
Purification functions
Soils
Soilecological engineering
Multi-SoilLayering method
Multi-Soil-LayeringMSL method
A Multi-Soil-Layering (MSL) system consists of water permeable layers and soil mixture layers which are arranged in brick pattern.
Water permeable layer (Ks > 0.1 cm/sec) uniform size 1-5mm of particles zeolite, pumice, gravel, charcoal, etc. Soil mixture layer : high purification function Natural soil Metal iron (P absorbent, reducer) Organic matter (H donor for denitrification) Charcoal (absorbent of various pollutants) or/and other functional materials
Cross section of a MSL system used for a field experiment of river water treatment in Kyusyu, Japan.
MSL method
N2 CO 2 Aerobic de composition
Adsorption
Anaerobic de composition
Fe 2+
NO 3 -
O2 Aeration
50 (cm)
2 1.5
6 60 50 50
MSL1
Zeolite
MSL2
MSL3
Soil mixture layer (block)
Thickness Width
Water inside outside outside distribution Contact high low moderate efficiency Advantage High treatment Simple structure Smooth water flow efficiency (easy construction) High loading rate (per unit soil) (less clogging)
Application of MSL System for wastewater treatment Domestic wastewater from individual houses or a community development (secondary-advanced treatment)
Sewage (advanced treatment) Toilet wastewater (advanced treatment) Wastewater from toilet, shower, kitchen of a camping facility (secondary-advanced treatment)
MSL
100
600 mm
100 150 100 100 100 100 100 100 50 50 50 50 50 50
1200 mm
Cross Section
Jute net Zeolite 1-3mm Plastic net Gravel 40mm Vinyl sheet
Impermeable sheet
(mg/l)
(mg/l) 14
left axis
right axis
WW BOD
TW BOD WW PO4-P
WW T-N
TW T-N TW PO4-P 10 8 6 4 2 12
140
120
100
80 60
40
20
0
7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 13:00 16:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00
40 30 20 10
(mgl)
4 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 100 80 3 60 2 T-P 40 1 rem oval percentage 20 0 0 1990 1991 1992 1994% 1995 1996 1997 1998 2000 Concentration and 1993 removal of BOD,T-P,T-N in1999 treated water 50 100
( )
100 80 60 40 20 0
wastewater
7 (4)
19 (83)
0.4 (0.1)
MSL system
58 (37)
4 (17)
80 (22)
treated water
Summary of wastewater types applied to MSL systems and the treatment results in previous works.
WW types and HLR
Polluted river water Secondary treated swegae (220-4700 l/m3/d WW (mg/l) PLR (g/m3/d TW (mg/l) Removal rate (%)
BOD
25.9 65.7 5.1 77
SS
25.1 63.5 4.9 78
T-N
11.8 8.5 3.9 52
T-P
2.68 6.78 1.65 44
192 76 16 91
1434 329 47.4 96
WW: wastewater, TW: treated water, HLR: hydraulic loading rate, PLR: pollutants loading rate
Simazin
Fenitrothion
200
910 2000 93
nd
14
Napropamid
PCE
nd
3
20 (ng/l) 15
E2 concentration in a river
A possible removal mechanism is adsorption by humic substances and charcoal, and decomposition.
10
( ) removal % (62)
5
(82)
(92)
(83)
(82)
R.W
Sandy And. And. And. Sandy 2000 4000 1000 2000 1000 Soil type and loading rate. (And.=Black volcanic ash soil)
reuse
Restaurant