Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole of in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: ___________________________________________________________________
Program in Comparative Media Studies May 07, 2010
ABSTRACT The recent increase in digital gaming players and platforms does not imply that digital gaming is as inclusive as it could be. There are still gaps in participation that, if left unaddressed, will exclude groups who have been historically marginalized. Women are among those individuals most vulnerable to exclusion from gaming. In order to better understand the motivations and practices of female players, this study focuses on a group of undergraduates at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology who have created a community that plays digital and non-digital games together and includes women. The research was conducted over eight months using interviews and participant observations. The study concludes that there are interrelated factors at the group, game play, and individual levels that influence this particular community's inclusiveness. These factors include how the community values the play process over who wins or loses a game, uses games as facilitators of playful socializing, and negotiates their identities in relation to the gamer stereotype.
Acknowledgements
To my committee Mia Consalvo, Henry Jenkins, and William Uricchio for inspiring and supportingmethroughoutthisprocess. TomyfamilyMom,Dad,Justin,Amy,Noah,andHaleyforalwaysbeingthereandbelievingI coulddothis. TomyCMSclassmatesforhelpingmethinkinnewwaysandmakingthelongnightsworkingas funastheycouldbeespeciallyMichelleMoonLee,NickSeaver,andSheilaSeleswithwhomI sharedanofficeandmanyLOLs. ToDorisRuschforgivingtheextrahelp(andsometimespush)thatIneeded. To my brilliant copy editors: Alexis Clements, Michelle Moon Lee, Alysa Nahmias, and Matt Schaffer. Tomyfriendsandlovedones,inBoston,DC,andNewYork,whostuckwithmeasIbounced backandforththesetwoyears,especiallyMattSchaffer,whotrulyisthebest.
TableofContents
Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................ 5 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 9 Researchbackground ...............................................................................................................10 WhyMIT? .................................................................................................................................12 Genderingofdigitalgames.......................................................................................................14 Previousresearchonfemaleplayers........................................................................................17 DefiningPlayandGames ..........................................................................................................20 ResearchQuestions ..................................................................................................................28 Methods ...................................................................................................................................29 Backgroundoftheresearchsite...............................................................................................32 Howthe5Ncommunitycametobe.........................................................................................33 ChapterStructure .....................................................................................................................35 CHAPTERONE:TheCommunity ............................................................................................ 37 Playcommunityofthe5Nlounge ............................................................................................41 Socialgoalsofthe5Ncommunity ............................................................................................46 5Ncommunityasaparticipatoryculture .................................................................................50 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................57 CHAPTERTWO:GamesandGamePlay ................................................................................. 59 Gamesandsocialgoals.............................................................................................................60 SuperSmashBros.Brawl ..........................................................................................................62 Wittybanterandtrashtalk ......................................................................................................74 Roleofcompetition ..................................................................................................................78 Cardgames ...............................................................................................................................81 Motivationsforgameplay .......................................................................................................89 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................92 CHAPTERTHREE:ThePlayers ................................................................................................ 94 Beginningtogame....................................................................................................................95 DifferentContexts,DifferentModesofPlay ..........................................................................107 Whatisagame?Whoisagamer? .........................................................................................116 Conclusion ..............................................................................................................................124 CONCLUSION ...................................................................................................................... 127 REFERENCES........................................................................................................................ 135
INTRODUCTION
Asdigitalgamingbecomesmoreintegratedintoourlives,wemustcontinuallyask:Whois beingleftoutandwhy?Gamingisanindustry,ameansofexpression,awaytoconnectwith people,andanengagingleisurelyactivity.Contrarytopopularstereotypes,gaminghasnever beenanactivityjustforkids.Thenumberofuswhoplaydigitalgamesisincreasing.Thetypes ofgamesweplayandtheplatformsweplaythemonarediversifying.Thisexpansion,however, doesnotimplythatdigitalgamingisasinclusiveasitcouldbe.Therearestillgapsin participationthat,ifleftunaddressed,willexcludegroupswhohavebeenhistorically marginalized. Womenareamongthoseindividualsmostvulnerabletoexclusionfromgaming.Thisisnotto saythatwomenarenotparticipatingingaming.Womenhavehadasignificantpresencein somegamingcontexts.Whatisproblematic,asBryceandRutter(2002)havedescribed,isthat womenarerendered'invisible'bymaledominatedgamingcommunities,thegamesindustry andacademicresearch(p.244).Thisinvisibilityoffemaleplayershelpstomaintainthe stereotypethatdigitalgamingisboystuffand,inturn,createsfurtherobstaclesto participationindigitalgaming. Inthisthesis,Ishedlightonthisinvisiblegroupbyexploringthemotivationsandpracticesof agroupofundergraduatesattheMassachusettsInstituteofTechnology(MIT)whohave 9
Researchbackground ThisthesiswasinspiredbyessaysintherecentcompilationBeyondBarbieandMortalKombat (Kafai,Heeter,Denner,&Sun,2008),whichalongwithitspredecessorfromtenyearsprior, FromBarbietoMortalKombat(CassellandJenkins,1998),containsmuchofthefoundational thinkingonfemaleplayersanddigitalgaming2.Together,thesebooksofferanumberofuseful researchfindings,conceptualframeworksforthinkingaboutgenderandgaming,andpossible solutionsformakingdigitalgamingculturemoreinclusiveoffemaleplayers. Twocallsforfurtherstudyinessaysfromthesebooksguidedmyresearch.First,Elizabeth Hayes(2008)hypothesizedinGirls,Gaming,andTrajectoriesofITExpertisethatplayingand designingdigitalgamesmaybeameansforhelpinggirlsandyoungwomenbecomemore interestedininformationtechnology.Ifvalidated,suchaconnectionwouldbeasignificant findingbecause,astheopportunitiesforcareersintechnologyareexpanding,theroleof
1
10
womenindesigningthattechnologyhasdecreasedoverthepasttwentyyears.The percentagesofwomenearningcomputerscienceundergraduateandmaster'sdegreeshave actuallydeclinedsincethe1990s(NationalScienceFoundation,2009)andthereisgrowing needtofindwaystopiquegirls'interestintheareasofscience,technology,engineering,and math(STEM).Ifplayinganddesigninggamescouldincreasegirls'technicalinterestandabilities, wewouldpotentiallyhaveawayofaddressingthisgenderdisparity. Beforewecanknowwhetherornotgirls'interestinITfieldsincreasewhentheyplayordesign digitalgames,thereisaneedformoreresearchaboutwomenwhoalreadyplaydigitalgames includingwhatgamestheyplay,whereandhowtheyplay,andtheirmotivationsforplaying. T.L.Taylor(2008a)hascalledforthiskindofresearch: Currentwomenplayersareregularlyseenasanomaliesandnotcentralresearch interests...Whatthismeans,howeveristhatwetendtoleavetheirpleasures,their strategies,theirnetworks,theirplayalwaysatthemargins...Theytellusalotaboutthe pleasuresofgameplayandwhatittakestogetthere.Andforthoseinterestedin creatingchange,whatbetterplacetolookthantothewomenandgirlscreatingitnow? (p.56) Taylorrecognizesthelackofresearchfocusedonwomenwhocurrentlyplaydigitalgames.Itis notthatwomenarenotplayinggames,butthattheirparticipationisnotseenasthenormand thereforenotperceivedasworthyofresearch.TaylorbelievesasdoIandmanyothergames researchersthatthereisstillmuchtobelearnedaboutfemaleplayersandthatnew knowledgeaboutgenderandgamingwillalsoinformusaboutthekindsofpleasuresgames offertoallplayers.Inmyresearch,Itookupthiscalltolookwherewomenarealready participatingingaming.
11
WhyMIT? IbeganmysearchforfemaleplayersinmyimmediatesurroundingsatMIT.Iknewitwaslikely thatatMITaschoolknownforfosteringthenextgenerationofhackers,engineers,and scientiststherewouldbeasignificantpopulationofyoungwomenwhohadsustainedan interestindigitalgamingthroughhighschoolandintocollege.Ofcourse,MITundergraduates arenotrepresentativeofaveragecollegestudents.FemaleundergraduatesatMITdo, however,representakindofyoungwomanthatwecanlearnfrominordertounderstandwhat motivatesandsustainswomen'sinterestindigitalgaming.Perhapsbybetterunderstandingthe motivations,interests,andsocialcontextoftheseparticularwomen,whoareinterestedin gamingandtechnology(notnecessarilybecauseofeachother),wecanlearnmoreabouthow tosupportgirls'interestintechnologyingeneral. PreviousresearchontheculturesurroundingmediaandtechnologyatMIThasbeendonethat helpedpositionmyworkhere.SherryTurkle(1984;1997)hasconductedresearchonhowthe computer,asaprojectiveandevocativemedium,hasinfluencedpeoplesawarenessof themselvesand,inturn,howtheythinkaboutculture.Herapproachisamixofethnographic andpsychoanalyticmethodsanditlargelydrawsoncasesstudiesandinterviewswithstudents andprofessorsatMIT.SheoffersthoughtsontheroleofgenderatMIT,whichare,forthemost part,relatedtohowpeopleapproachcomputerprogramming. Researchonstudents'interactionswithpopularmediaonMIT'scampushasalsobeendonein atleasttwostudies.Jenkins(1995)researchedthediscursivecontextofStarTrekviewersat
12
MIT(p.215).Whilehisstudydidnotfocusongender,itdidexplorethemotivationsofstudents whowatchedtheshow,howitrelatedtotheirownworkinscienceandtechnology,andthe criteriabywhichtheyevaluatedtheshowandotherworksinthesciencefictiongenre.Jenkins foundthatStarTrekplayedasignificantroleinhowmanyofthestudentsmadesenseofthe roleofscienceandtechnologyintheirownlives,aswellashowtheydevelopedtheirown professionalideology...asmembersofthescientificcommunity(p.236).Jenkins'research offersausefulframeworkforevaluatingthewaysstudentsmakesenseofmedia;yet,because itwasbasedsolelyoninterviewsandfocusgroups,itdidnotadequatelytakeintoaccountthe students'socialcontext.Ford(2006)wasabletoprovidesomeofthiscontextwhenhestudied mediaconsumptionpatternsinanMITdorm.Whileitismeanttobeamoregeneralstudy, FordofferedinsightintohowdormlifeinfluencedMITstudents'relationshipswithvarious mediatextsandplatforms.Theserelationshipswereespeciallyshapedbystudents'lackof substantialprivatespaceandthelimitedresourcesavailabletothem,whichresultedinafair amountofmediaproselytizingbetweenstudentstosharetheirtastesandinterestsinvarious mediaforms(p.1). ItisimportanttonotethatdormselectionbystudentsatMIThappensdifferentlythanatmost othercolleges.MIT'sdormselectionprocessplayedasignificantroleinhowthecommunity thatwasthefocusofmyresearchwasabletocreateitsownculturearounditssharedinterests andgoals.Insteadofbeingrandomlyassigneddorms,studentsatMITareabletocreateliving communitiesaroundsharedinterestsorthemesthatcanbecultivatedoverthetimetheyarein school.Thesecommunitiesareabletoformbecausestudentscanstayinthesamedormrooms
13
fromyeartoyear,aswellasdecidehowtheywillpresenttheirhalltoincomingfreshman studentsduringdormpreviewopportunities.Dorms,andevencertainwingsorhalls,areknown forthemedliving,suchastheEastCampusdorm,whichattractsmanyengineersandhackers; orLaCasa,whichisalivingcommunitywithinthedormNewHousethatfocusesoninterestsin Latinoculture. Myfindingsfromresearchamongthisparticularcommunityaredeeplytiedtoitscontextat MIT,butthereisstillmuchtolearnfromtheseresultsabouthowwecanmorebroadlymake gamingparticipationmorediverse.Whileitisimportanttoremainawareofthecommunity's particularcircumstances,theyarenottheonlyfactorsthatinfluencetheinclusivenessofthe community.TheseotherfactorsarewhatIwillpresentandexamineinthefollowingthree chapters.
14
constitutedbycertainsortsofknowledgeandsocialpracticesaswellasotherformsof representation(1991,p.158). Thegenderedunderstandingoftheuseandproductionoftechnologiesisinextricablylinkedto hierarchicalassumptionsaboutskillandmasteryandisintertwinedwiththegenderingof computingingeneral.Turkle(1988)hasstudiedmaledominatedhackercultureatMITfor years,aswellaswomen'sreticencetowardscomputing.MargolisandFisher(2002) conductedastudyofwomeninthecomputersciencedepartmentofCarnegieMellon Universityusingadevelopmentalframeworkthatshowshowperceptionsofcomputingas maleterritoryorguystuffinfluencefemaleparticipationfromchildhoodtoadulthood. Corneliussen(2005)hasmovedthisresearchbeyondunderstandingcomputingasgenderedto anunderstandingofhowandwhywomenfindpleasureincomputersevenwhentheyare'the others'inrelationtothemasculineassociationsofcomputertechnology(p.235).Soweare movingfromrecognizingtheoftenmasculinizedperceptionsofcomputingandother technologytotryingtounderstandwhyandhowitisthatwomenactuallyfindawidevarietyof pleasuresinusingcomputers,includingformingsocialbondsandexpertisearoundthem. JensonanddeCastell(2005)connectthegenderingofcomputingtothegenderingofdigital games.Theyhavestatedthatthetrendingamesstudiesofessentializingwhatisfemalein digitalgamingbynomeansoriginateswithvideogameplaying,butisindigenoustothe cultureofcomputingmoregenerallyandthatthisgenderedcomputingculturealwaysalready
15
mediatesgirls'interactionswiththosetechnologies,amongwhichgameplayingisonlythe mostrecentsubjectofattention(p.2).Thisstatementtiesgenderandgamingissuesintoa largerculturalcontextthatgoesbeyondsimplyfiguringoutwhatgirlgamesshouldbelike.I willthenadoptanapproachinthisthesismuchliketheoneIshowthatCorneliussen(2005) takesabove.Iaminterestedinmovingbeyondtherecognitionthatdigitalgamingisoften perceivedasguystuffandontoexploringwhatpleasuresmotivateandwhatsocialcontexts sustainfemaleplayers. Also,itisworthmentioningthatdigitalgamesarenotgenderedinthesamewayacrossall platformsandgenres.Socialcontexthelpspeoplemakesenseofwhethertheythinkgirls shouldplayaNintendoDS,orifaSonyPS3ismadeforboys.TheElectronicSoftware Association(2009)hasclaimedthat40%ofallplayersarewomen,suggestingthatfemale playershaveachievedastateofnearparitywiththeirmalecounterparts(p.3).Butbreaking downthatpercentagebyplatform,age,andgenreshowthattherearewidegapsbetween maleandfemaleparticipationinmanyareasofgaming.JensonanddeCastell(2005)have criticizedtheuseoflargescalequantitativestudiestoexaminegenderandgamingfor obscuringvariationsinparticipationbetweenmaleandfemaleplayers: [S]tatisticsliketheseareusedtodismissthequestionofgenderandcomputergame playingfromtheoutset(itisnolongeraproblemsincesomanymorewomenare indicatingthattheyareplaying).Oncegenderhasbeenexcisedasstatistically insignificant,thereistypicallynofurthergenderbaseddisaggregationofdata,even whenitmightseemthatstatisticallyrelevantdistinctionsshouldbemadewithrespect togamepreferencesandtimeonthegame.(p.3) Smallerscalequalitativeresearch,suchasthisthesis,strengthensourunderstandingofhow broadstatisticsbreakdownintangiblegamingcontexts,ondiversegamingplatforms,andby 16
demographicssuchasage,raceandethnicity,andclass.
Previousresearchonfemaleplayers ThereisagrowingbodyofresearchongenderandgaminginadditiontothetwoBarbieto MortalKombatbooks.Thisresearchhastendedtofocusoncertainaspectsofgaming, especiallygamingbyyounggirls,onlinegaming,anddesigninggamesforfemaleplayers,andit hasleftmultipleareasunexploredandopentofurtherdiscoveries. Researchonfemaleplayerstodatefocusesmostlyonschoolagedgirls.Thisresearchhas contributedtotheunderstandingoftheimportanceofaccesstogamingtechnology,the complexnegotiationsofgenderperformancethatsometimesoccurwhengirlsplaydigital games,andtheroleofdiscoursethatgoesonaroundgameplay(deCastell,Boschman,& Jenson,2009;OrrVered,1998;Taylor,Jenson,&deCastell,2007;Walkerdine,2006).While thesestudieshavecontributedsignificantfindings,onecommonaspecttonoteisthatmostof thesestudiestookplaceinafterschoolsettingsthatwerecreatedbytheresearchers.These controlledcontextstudiesmayhaveproduceddifferentunderstandingsofhowgirlsplaygames thanstudiesthatwerelessmanipulated.Thereisaneedforfurtherresearchthatlooksatgame playinlivingspaces,whereitmostoftenoccurs. Thestronginterestinlearninganddigitalgameshasskewedtheliteratureongenderand gamingsothatyoungeragesareoverrepresented,leavingagapinresearchonfemaleadult players.Theresearchthatdoesexistonwomenhasmostoftenbeenstudiesofwomenplaying
17
onlineinvirtualworlds,massivelymultiplayeronlineroleplayinggames(MMORPG's),and causalgames(Corneliussen&Rettberg,2008;Juul,2010;Pearce,2009;Taylor,2006).While thisresearchhasbeenhelpfulinexamininghowandwhywomenplay,thereismoreresearch neededtounderstandwomen'sofflinedigitalgamingpracticesandtheinfluenceofsocial contextforcolocatedgaming,i.e.whentheyareplayingwithotherplayersinthesame physicalspace. Therehasbeenapromisingshiftinthepastfewyearstorecognizetheimportanceofsocial contextinsituationswheregirlsandwomenplaydigitalgames(Beavis&Charles,2007;Carr, 2005;Lin,2008;Taylor,2006).Analyzingthestructuralelementsandcontentofdigitalgames arecertainlykeytounderstandinghowwomenmakesenseofdigitalgames,butexcluding contextualfactorssuchaswhothegameisbeingplayedwith,whereitisbeingplayed,and whyitisbeingplayedcanleadtoprescriptivethinkingabouthowgamedesigninfluencesthe behaviorofplayers.Taylor(2008b)hasproposedthat[r]atherthanseeingactualplayersand theiractivityasakindofsidebar(ormetaconstruct)toaninvestigationofgames,Iwould suggestthatcriticalgamesstudiesneedtotakeintoseriousaccounttheintersectionof structureandplayerculture(p.124).Researchersarerecognizingthatstrictlystudyinggames assystemsofrulesleavesouttheimportantfactorsthattheplayersbringtothegames,which influencehowthegamesareplayed. Twostudieswereparticularlyhelpfulforunderstandinghowsomewomenplayincolocated contexts.Thefirststudy,conductedbyKerr(2003),wasoneofthefewthathasdiscussed
18
women'spersonalhistorieswithgaming.Kerrfoundtwomajorfactorsthatinfluencedhowand whywomenparticipatedingamingculturewereaccesstoan'offline'socialnetworkofplayers andplayervisibilityandtherangeandqualityofgames(p.279).WhileKerr'sstudyoffereda deeperunderstandingofwomenandtheiridentitiesinrelationtoplayinggames,itdidnot explorethesocialcontextsinwhichthewomen'sgamingactuallytookplace.Thornham(2008) hasbeenoneofthefewresearcherstoanalyzethecontextsofcolocatedconsolegamingfor women.SheconductedanethnographicstudyofelevenBritishhouseholdsmostofwhich werecoedgroupsofyoungadultsandtheirgamingpractices.Shediscoveredacomplicated discoursethatexistedaroundgamingthatembodiedtheplayers'existingconceptionsof genderroles.Inadditiontodiscourse,shefoundthatnotionsofgenderrolesinfluencedhow peopleplayedgames,noting,[i]ndeed,itisnotjustacaseofwhattheyresupposedtosay,it isalsohowtheyresupposedtogamewhichistheissue(p.139).Thornham'sobservationsin thisstudywereabletoshowhowdeeplyintertwinedthesocialcontextcanbecomewithgame playinadomesticsetting. Inthisthesis,IbuildonThornham'swork,researchinganothergroupofmaleandfemaledigital gameplayerstobetterunderstandtheirmotivationsandpractices.However,Idonotwantmy researchonthisgrouptobestrictlyfocusedonsocialcontext.Insteadmyapproachisthree pronged:1)Ilookatthesocialdynamicsandinteractionsofthegroupofstudentsinthedorm loungetoseehowplayinggamesfitintotheirlargernetworkofrelationshipsandactivities;2)I focusonthemultiplayergamesthatwereplayedintheloungetobetterunderstandhowtheir structuralelementsandcontenthelpedfacilitatethesocialgoalsofthegroup;and3)Itakeup
19
Earlyresearch
promotessocialgroupingsthatareoftensurroundedbysecrecy(p.13).Caillois(1975)builds offofHuizinga'sworkonplay,butismorefocusedongames.HepraisesHuizingaforhis attempttodefinethecharacteristicsofplayandforrecognizingplay'sroleinthedevelopment ofculture,buthebelievestheHuizinga'sdefinitionis"atthesametimetoobroadandtoo narrow"(p.4).Cailloisdevelopsaframeworkforcategorizinggamesthatincludesfourtypes: agoncompetitivegames;aleagamesofchance;mimicrymakebelieve;andilinxphysical gamesthat"attempttodestroythestabilityofperception"(p.23).Thesefourtypescanbe combinedwithtwomoregeneralcategories,ludusandpaidia,toformamatrixof categorization.ForCaillois,playandgamesfallonascalebetweenpaidiaandludus,theformer havingfewrulesandthelatterbeingmorestructured.Heexplainsthatludusis complementarytoandarefinementofpaidia,whichitdisciplinesandenriches(p.29). Caillois'conceptionsofplayandgameareimportantbecausemanycurrentresearchersuse themasfoundationsfortheirowndefinitionsorcategorizations.Whilehisideasarepopular, theyarealsoproblematicbecausetheyincludeaparticularnormativeassumptionaccordingto whichplayissubordinatetogames,asshowninthequoteabove.Cailloisfirstrecognizesa complementaryrelationshipbetweenpaidiaandludus,butthengoesontoascribequalities toludusthatdisciplineandenrichpaidia.Thissubordinationofplaylikeactivitiestogame likeactivitiesisimportanttorecognizebecauseitcanleadtothegenderingofplayfulpractices asfeminine,whichcancreateboundarieswithinthedigitalgamingindustry,gamesresearch, andtheculturesurroundingdigitalgames.
21
Fron,Fullerton,Ford,Morie,andPearce(2007)proposethat[t]oday'shegemonicgame industryhasinfusedbothindividuals'andsocieties'experiencesofgameswithvaluesand normsthatreinforceinvestmentsinaparticulardefinitionofgamesandplay,creatingacyclical systemofsupplyanddemandinwhichalternateproductsofplayaremarginalizedand devalued(p.309).Iffeminizedplaypracticesaredevaluedbygamedevelopers,forexample, theymightbeneglectedinthedigitalgamemarket.Thiswouldlimitthechoicesthatfemale playershave,addingtoacycleofexclusionoffemaleplayersfromsomegamingparticipation. Assumptionsaboutthesubordinationofthefeminizedplaytomasculinizedgamesarealso foundindiscoursearoundplayasadevelopmentalstageofchildhood.Forinstance, developmentalpsychologist,BrunoBettelheim,(1987)explainsplayandgamesastwodifferent developmentalstages,theformerbeingcharacterizedbyfreedomfromallbutpersonally imposedrules(whicharechangedatwill),byfreewheelingfantasyinvolvement,andbythe absenceofanygoalsoutsideoftheactivityitself,andthelatterbeingmorecompetitiveand characterizedbyagreedupon,oftenexternallyimposed,rules,byarequirementtousethe implementsoftheactivityinthemannerforwhichtheyareintendedandnotasfancysuggests, andfrequentlybyagoalorpurposeoutsidetheactivity,suchaswinningthegame(p.4243). ForBettelheim,playisdoneforpureenjoymentwhilegamescanofteninvolvestress(p.43). SimilartoCaillois'categorizationsofpaidiaandludus,Bettelheimdistinguishesbetweenplay andgames,framingplayasaprecursorandlessdevelopedstagetogames.Indoingthishe reinforcesahierarchyofgamesasmoreadvancedthanplay,whichperhapsisstillpresentin thedevaluationofmoreopenendedgames.
22
Workingdefinitions Forthepurposesofmyresearchastartingassumptionofwhichwasthatthevalueof differentapproachestogamesisanopenquestionIsoughtadistinctionbetweenplayand gameinwhichtheformerwasnotautomaticallysubordinatedtothelatter.Afterdiscussingthe historyofthetermsatlength,SalenandZimmerman(2004),intheirbookRulesofPlay,have offeredadistinctionthatdoesnotimportthenormativeassumptionsthatcreateahierarchy betweenthetwonotions.Theyproposedthefollowingdefinitions: Agameisasysteminwhichplayersengageinanartificialconflict,definedbyrules,that resultsinaquantifiableoutcome(p.80). Playisfreemovementwithinamorerigidstructure(p.304).
Manyotherlanguagesdonotdistinguishbetweenthewordsplayandgame,butSalenand ZimmermanbelievethattheseparationofthewordsplayandgameinEnglishisanopportunity
23
toconsidergamesandplayastwoseparateideaswithrelated,butdistinctmeanings(p.72).I employthisseparationusedbySalenandZimmermaninmythesistodistinguishbetween groupsofplayersthatfocusontheprocessofplayinggamesratherthantheendresultsof games. SalenandZimmerman'sdefinitionsarebroadenoughtocoverawiderangeofunderstandings ofplayandgame,butthereisapotentialcomplicationwiththeirdefinitionofgamethatI wouldliketoaddressbeforemovingforward.Intheirdefinitionofgame,SalenandZimmerman createaboundaryaroundwhatisandisnotagamebasedonwhetherornothereisa quantifiableoutcome,or,inotherwords,agoalthatisclearlydiscernible.Andtheyarenot theonlyresearcherstoincludethistypeofcriterionintheirdefinition.JesperJuul(2005) createdthediagram(Figure1)aspartoftheClassicGameModeltohelpdelineatewhatfell withinhisunderstandingofgame(p.23).
24
Figure1Juul'sClassicGameModel(2005,p.23).
25
andZimmerman's(2004)definitions,thesegamesareborderlineorlimitcasesbecause theirgoalsaremoreoftenindividuallyorsociallydefinedthanprogrammedintothegame. Withthisconceptualexclusion,thereisapracticalriskthatcertainplayerswillnotbeseenas participatingingamingcultureandthattheymightbeexcludedfromthescopeofresearchin gamestudies. AspartoftheIntroductiontoanissueofFeministMediaStudies(Arthurs&Zacharias,2007), threegamesresearchers,MiaConsalvo,SaraM.Grimes,andHelenW.Kennedy,discussedthe genderingofplayasfeminineandgamesasmasculine.Kennedyfirststates,[t]hedominant definitionsofwhatcountsasgamesoftenexcludepreciselythesiteswheregirls(orwomen) aremostvisibleandactive...thesekindsofplayfultechnologiesarefrequentlyignoredin theorisingaboutgamesandgamers(p.106).GrimesacknowledgesCaillois'problematic distinctionbetweenpaidiaandludusasaparticularlyaptexampleofmalecentricityinthe playliterature.Icouldn'thelpbutfeelthathisconceptofpaidia,ifbetterdeveloped,actually correspondstomanygamesthataretraditionallycodedas'feminine';hissubordinationof 'paidia'to'ludus''instrumental,''civilising'play,isparticularlyproblematicfromthis perspective(p.108).GrimesaddsthatTheSimsandothergamesthataremoreopenended arecalledboundarygamesinJuul'smodelexactlybecausetheyexceedthedominant conceptualisationsofgames/gameplay/gameplaypleasures.Sothepleasureaspectof abandonment,purposelessness,orevensocialplaypracticesisdisavowed(p.109).Grimes andKennedycapturehowresearchthatreliestooheavilyonastrictdefinitionofgamesas goalorientedcanleaveentiregroupsofplayersinthiscase,womenandmenwhoplay
26
moreopenendedgamesoutofourunderstandingofwhatmakesgamingpleasurable. TowardstheendoftheconversationConsalvosummarizestherisksofexclusiveterminology:I thinkit'susefultorememberthatjustaswefindterminologyhelpfulinorderingourthinking, ourthinkingcanalltooeasilybeorderedbyourterms.Naminganddefiningareideological, andcanshutdownunderstandingsjustastheyallowothers,andweneedtobevigilantin seeingjusthowwearegoingaboutdefiningandnamingwhatwearetryingtostudy(p.109).I amsympathetictoConsalvo'scritiquethatthewaygameisdefinedhaspotentialtoshapethe scopeofresearchforgamestudies.Wemustbecarefulnottoconflatewhatweconsidervalid subjectsofresearchwithcertainconceptswithingamestudiesespeciallywhendoingsocould reducethesphereofresearchandexcludevaluabletopics.Butdistinctionslikethosemadeby SalenandZimmermancanstillbeusefulforcategorizingapproachestogamesandeven broadeningthescopeofgamestudiestoincludemoresubjects. Untilrecentlyforexample,goalorientedgamesandtheirplayershavebeenthepredominant subjectsofresearchingamestudies.Thereisaneedtobroadenthefocusofstudytoinclude moreplayfulactivitiesandthosewhoparticipateinplayfulactivities.Itismypositionthatgame studiesoughttoincludegoalorientedandnongoalorientedgames.Buteven,articulatingthis basicthesisdependsonaconceptualdistinctionbetweenthetwotypesofapproachesto gaming.WhileIagreewithConsalvothatwewanttobeawareoftheinfluenceofourterms,I viewtheSalenandZimmermandistinctionasvaluableforachievingtheendwebothdesire: greaterinclusivenessingamesstudies.Byaddressingthisissueexplicitlyearlyoninmythesis,I
27
hopetoreducethelikelihoodthatmyadoptionofSalenandZimmerman'sdistinctionand specificallytheirdefinitionofgamewillbeinterpretedasamovetorestrictthescopeofgame studies. Inthisthesis,ratherIuseSalenandZimmerman'sdefinitionsastoolstoexaminethe relationshipbetweeninclusionandaparticularcommunity'semphasisontheplayprocessover whowinsthegametocreateamoreinclusivegamingcontext.ThedistinctionmadebySalen andZimmermanbetweenplayandgamesbasedonwhetherthereisaquantifiablegoalornot isinstrumentaltoestablishingmydistinctioninChapterOneofdescribingthegroupof studentsIresearchedasaplaycommunityratherthanagamingcommunity.Thismoveis extremelyhelpfultoidentifyingthefactorsthatpromoteinclusiveness,whichcouldhaveutility ingamestudiesasadiscipline.
ResearchQuestions MyresearchquestionsforthisthesisevolvedtoreflecttheexploratoryprocessIunderwent.I beganmyresearchinterestedinthemotivationsandpracticesoffemaleundergraduateswho playeddigitalgamesoncampusatMIT.Knowinglittleofdormlifeorgamingactivitieson campus,Idecidedtocreatequestionsthatwerebroadenoughtoleadtoageneral understandingofwhatdigitalgamingbyfemaleplayerslookedlikeatMIT: WhatarefemaleMITundergraduates'motivationsforplayingdigitalgames? WhatarethegamesthatwomenplayinpersonwithothersonMIT'scampus? HowandwheredowomenatMITplaydigitalgames? Whatisthecriteriabywhichundergraduatefemalestudentsdeterminewhatisa gameandwhoisagamer?
28
Methods Thisdescriptionofmyresearchmethodsismeanttogivethereaderasenseoftheever evolvingprocessthatIwentthroughtorefineandnarrowmythesis'focusoverthecourseofa year.Whatbeganasageneralinterestintherelationshipbetweengenderandgamingended upasasmallscaleethnographyofacommunitywhoplaysgamestogetherinthe5Nloungeof anMITdorm.(5Nreferstothedorm'sfloorandwingwheretheloungeislocated.)Thisgroup waschosenbecauseoftheparticipationofseveralwomenwhohadhistoriesofplayingdigital gamesbeforeenteringcollege,aswellaswomenwhoweremorerecentlyintroducedtodigital gamingordidnotplaydigitalgamesatall.Theresearchforthisthesiscanbestbeunderstood intwoparts:first,asaseriesofexploratoryinterviewstounderstandhowwomenplaydigital gamesoncampus,andsecond,asafocusedstudyofaresearchsitethatincludedparticipant
29
observationsandsubsequent,detailedinterviews. Istartedmyresearchprocessbyinterviewingseveralundergraduatewomen.Mymethodsfor selectingwomentointerviewwerevaried.First,Ireachedoutviaemailtoseveralmaleand femalestudentswhomIhadmetattheSingaporeMITGAMBITGameLab,whichwaswhere mygraduatestudentofficewaslocatedatthetime.IalsosentanemailtotheAssassins'Guild, aliveactionroleplayinggrouponcampusaskingthemtoforwardmyrequesttointerview womenwhoplayeddigitalgamesoncampus.Thisinitialcontactledmetoscheduleafirst roundofinterviewswiththreefemalestudents. Iconductedinterviewsinpubliclocationsoncampus,usuallyattheStudentCenter,andI recordedtheaudiofortranscription.Thestyleoftheinterviewswasinformaland conversational.Iusuallybeganbyaskingtheintervieweetotellmeaboutherhistorywith gaming.TheintervieweeknewthatIwasmostlyinterestedindigitalgames,sonondigital gamingdidnotcomeupveryoften.Ithenwouldaskaboutthecurrentgamesthatsheplayed, howsheplayedthem,andwhyshelikedthem.Ifinterestingmomentswerementioned, especiallywheregenderwasobviouslyafactor,Iwouldaskhertogointomoredetail.Ialso askedeachintervieweetotalkaboutwhyshedecidedtocometoMITandhowshedefinedthe termsgameandgamer. Afterthisinitialroundofinterviews,Ilearnedthatmostofthedigitalgamingoncampus happenedindorms.Myfirstinterviewee,Lisa,whowouldbecomemymaininformant,invited
30
metocomeplaygameswithheratherdorm.ThisiswhenIfirstencounteredmyresearchsite, the5Ndormlounge.AsImentionedabove,duringmyfirstvisitsto5NinOctoberand November2009,Iwasimpressedbythediversityofthegroupplayingdigitalgamesinthe lounge.Asaresultofthesevisits,Idecidedtoconductparticipantobservationsoverthenext sixmonthstobetterunderstandthesocialdynamicsofthegroupandtheirgamingpractices (Gray,2003,p.83).Ivisitedthedormloungeonetotwotimeseachmonth,usuallyinthe evenings,toplaygamesandsocializewiththegroup.ThiswasusuallyaThursday,Friday,or Saturdaynight,asthesewerethemostpopularnightsforstudentstovisittheloungeandplay games. Duringvisits,Itookfewnotesandinsteadtriedtoparticipateasmuchaspossibleinthe activitiesthattookplaceinandaroundthedormlounge.Theseincluded:playingvideoand cardgames,socializingandjokingaround,eating,andwatchingamovie.Ialsoconducted interviewswithmorestudentswhoparticipatedinactivitiesinthelounge.Ifoundthese studentsthroughrecommendationsofotherstudentsorbyapproachingthemmyselfinthe lounge.TheseinterviewswerestructuredsimilarlytowhatIdescribeabove,butalsoincluded specificquestionsaboutthegroupinthe5Nlounge,includinghowitcametobeandhowit currentlyfunctions.Atthetime,Ialsoconductedinterviewswiththreemorefemale undergraduateswhowerenotaffiliatedwiththelounge.Ilocatedthesestudentsbyemailing myrequestforinterviewstoseveraldorms'studentgovernmentmemberswhoforwardeditto theirdormemaillists. Aftereachvisittothe5Nlounge,Irecordedfieldnotesonmycomputer.Ialsotranscribedthe 31
Backgroundoftheresearchsite Thecommunitythatgatheredinthe5N5loungebegantoforminSeptember2009.Aroundthis time,thecoregroupwhowerefreshmanatthetimebefriendedeachotheratan orientationeventbeforedormselectiontookplace.Theycoordinatedtheirtophousingpicks andwereabletoliveinthesamedorm.Theywereevenabletofindroomsonthesamefloor: 5N. Iinterviewedfivestudentsfromthisgroupoffriendswhoatthetimeofmyresearchwere sophomores: Lisaisacomparativemediastudiesmajorwhowasmyfirstintervieweeandbecamemy maininformant.SheisoneofthefewstudentswithherownPS3,makingherroom anotherhubofgaminginthedorm. Patisaverysocialchemicalengineeringmajorwholovestoplayroleplayinggames (RPG)andisconsideredbysometobetheleaderofthe5Nbunch. Jasonisadoublemajorinmaterialscienceandengineeringandcomparativemedia studieswhoalsoplaysdigitalgamesatthenewspaperofficeoncampus.
5
Thenamesofthedormfloorandthestudentshaveallbeenchangedtoprotecttheidentityofthesubjects.
32
33
Theystartedplayinggamestogether,especiallythevideogameSuperSmashBros.Brawl6,in anotherstudent'sroom: Jessica:BeforelastyearalltheyhadwasAndres,andhehad[aWii]inhisroom.He'sa character;hegraduatedlastyear. Pat:ImeanlastyearwehadAndres;he'sabig6'1and280pounds,solidmuscle,and hewouldplayvideogameswithus. Andreswasavocalandhumorousplayerwhosetthemoodforthegameplaythatcontinuedin the5Nloungeafterhegraduated.Hewasknownforscreamingfunnyphrasesatthecharacters inthegamewhensomethingdidnotgothewayhewanteditto. Janelle:ThatwasAndres.Iusedtoliveafewdoorsoversoallyou'dhearwas Jigglypuff!orPikachu!veryloudly.Itwasveryamusing. Mei:Iactuallydon'tknowwhywegetintoitsomuch.Maybeit'sAndres'influence. Weplayandwejuststartyellingateachother. Jessica:That'ssoAndres. Interviewer:Butisitseriousorisitfun? Jessica:WhenIwastalkingtoourGRT[GraduateResidentTutor]fromlast year...talkingaboutgettinganewGRT...shewaslike,youhavetofindsomeonewho's OKwiththenoiseandtheyellingweirdthingslike,ScrewyouPikachu!andyeah, that'soneofthetrademarksofAndres.
34
Mei:YeahEmblemandSmashbasically.ThatwastheonlytwogamesIhad.OhMario Kart8too. Jessica:YeahweplayedalotofMarioKartlastyear. Mei:'CeptforIgotsogoodatMarioKart;lastyearIownedallofthem. In2009,theloungehadpreviouslybeenaspacemostlyforseniorstohangout,butafterMei movedherWiiin,sheandtheotherfreshmanstartedtotakeoverthespace. Lisa:[Thegaming]actuallystartedupsecondsemester.Itwaslikefirstsemesterwe werejusttryingtogettoknowBostonandgoingeverywhere,tryingtodoproblemsets, gettingthroughcollegeandstuff.Andsecondsemesterwefeltlikeweownedtheplace. Startedtakingtheseniors'5Nloungeandplayinggameswheneverwefeltlikeit...the seniorsusedtoalwayshangoutthere,butthenwestartedplayinggamesthereand theygottiredofthenoise.Sotheystartedhangingoutindifferentlounges.
35
andhowthatisrelatedtoitsinclusivenessofwomenandpeoplewhodonotplaygames. ChapterTwonarrowsinfocustolookatthecontentandstructuralelementsofthegamesthat wereplayedinthe5Nlounge,includinghowtheseelementsfacilitatedthesocialgoalsofthe group,andhowthesocialgoalsinfluencedhowthegameswereplayed.Digitalandnondigital gameswereplayedintheloungeand,often,bydifferentpeople.Thisallowedmultiplewaysof participatingingaminginthelounge.Whilethegamesthestudentsplayedhadwinnersand losers,theprimaryfunctionofthegameswastofacilitateplayfulsocializing. ChapterThreeexploresthemotivations,playingstylesandexperiencesofindividualplayers. Thefemaleplayers'gaminghistoriesaredescribed,revealingsomecommonalitiessuchas growingupplayingdigitalgameswithmostlymalepeersandshowingtherangeofgaming preferencesandstyleswomenhaddependingonwhattheyfoundpleasureinandwhatthey hadaccessto.Thischapteralsodiscussestheplayers'understandingsofthetermsgameand gamerandhowmanyofthefemaleplayersnegotiatedthestereotypesofgamingculture.
36
CHAPTERONE:TheCommunity
Itismyfirstnightvisitingthe5NloungeandI'mnotsurewhattoexpect.Lisa,myinformant, meetsmeinthedormlobbyandtakesmeupthestairs.Wewalkdownahallwaylinedwith dormroomsuntilwearriveatthelounge.Herethehallwaywidenstotheleftintoalargeopen spacewhereabouttenstudentsarechattingandlaughing.Lisadoesn'tintroduceme.Instead, shejumpsontoacouch,whichIgatheriswhereshewassittingbeforeIarrived,andstarts playingSuperSmashBros.Brawl(Brawl). Iputmybackpackdown,takeoffmycoat,andsurveythescene.Theloungeisaspacious rectangle,about25'by20'.ItiscarpetedwithbarewallsexceptforacoupleofMITissued posters,oneofwhichtellsstudentstoThinkoutsidethebottle(referringtoalcohol)andtwo whiteboards.Onewhiteboardhasalongmathematicalequationscribbledonit.Halfofone wallisakitchensetupwhereafemalestudentiscookingacomplicatedmeal.Tworound tablesextendatarightanglefromthekitchenwall.
37
Figure2Studentsinthe5NLoungeonaThursdaynight.
Aboutfivefeetawayfromthekitchenareaalongthesamewallisthefocalpointofthelounge alargeTV,probably30inchesinsizewithaNintendoWiiconsoletuckedintoacabinet beneathit.Threestandard,dormissueloveseatsareplacedinaUshapearoundtheTV,with anotherUofseatsbehindit.Atthismoment,twofemaleandthreemalestudentssitinthe seatsclosesttotheTV,fourofthemwithcontrollersintheirhands,pressingawayatthe buttonsandtradingwittybanterandphraseslikeLOLOLOLwhensomethingfunnyhappens areferencetothepopularinstantmessageabbreviationthatmeanslaughoutloud.Onemale studentwithoutacontrollerinhishandssitswithalaptopsurfingtheweb.Afemalestudent asksnooneinparticular,Isthefoodcoming?Amaleplayer,Pat,finisheshisroundinBrawl andcallstherestauranttocheckontheorder. *******
38
ThisfirstencounterwassimilarinmanywaystoeveryothervisitImadetothe5Nloungeona Fridaynight.Forthefirsthalfoftheweek,thespacewaslikemanyotherdormlounges:aplace forstudentstowatchaTVshow,eatdinner,ordohomework.However,Thursdaysthrough Sundays,the5Nloungebustledwithsocialactivity. Theloungewasadestinationsometimesplanned,sometimeshappeneduponforagroupof abouttwentystudents.Someofthemlivedon5N,butsomelivedonotherfloorsandevenin otherdorms.Duringthebusiesttimesinthelounge,therewereusuallyafewactivities happeningatthesametime,includingplayingdigitalgames,playingnondigitalgames,cooking, eating,doinghomework,reading,andhavingconversationswithfriends.Itwasuncommonfor everyonetobedoingthesamethingatonce.Theloungebecameanenergetic,playfulspace that,attimes,feltchaotic. BeforeIvisitedthe5Nlounge,Iimagineditwouldbefullofgamerslikethekindportrayedon TVorinmovies.Thesearestereotypicalgamers;theyaremostlyyoung,whitemaleswho ascribetoahardcoreethic:spendasmuchtimeaspossible,playasdifficultgamesaspossible, playgamesattheexpenseofeverythingelse(Juul,2010,p.29).Iamnotsomeonewho regularlyplaysdigitalgames.Ihaveplayedthemsporadicallythroughoutlife,butmostofmy notionsofpeoplewhoplaydigitalgamescomefrommediarepresentations,storiestoldby friends,andfromreadingpreviousstudiesondigitalgamingculture.Withthisadmittedly modestunderstandingofwhoplaysandhow,Iassumedthatiftherewerewomenpresentin thelounge,theywouldmostlikelybewatchingmenplay,andifwomendidplay,theywouldbe
39
viewedbythemaleplayersmoreasthetokenfemalethanasanequalchallenger. Ipresentmyownpreconceptionsherebecausetheyarelikelysimilartothoseofpeoplewho arenotinvolvedingamestudiesorgamingsubcultures.Digitalgamingformany,andespecially onconsoleslikethePS3andXbox,hasbecomeconnectedtothegamerstereotypeIexplained above.Recently,though,therehavebeenstudiesthatrecognizethegamerstereotypeisno longer,orneverwas,adequatefordescribingwhoplaysdigitalgames(Cassell&Jenkins,2008; Fronetal.,2007;Voida&Greenberg,2009).Thereisstillmuchresearchtobedoneonplayers whofalloutsideofthisstereotypeinordertounderstandthewiderangeofindividualsand playingcontextsthatareinvolvedindigitalgaming. AsIgottoknowthestudentsinthe5NloungeovertheeightmonthsIvisited,Ifoundmostof mypreconceptionsaboutwhoplaysdigitalgamesandhowtheyplaytobetoonarrow.First, themaletofemaleratioofstudentsintheloungewasalmostalwayseven.AsIwillshowlater, thiswasnotthecaseduringeveryinstanceofgameplay,butoveralltherewereusuallyas manymenaswomenintheloungeandmanywomenparticipatedingaming.9Second,the racialandethnicmixofthestudentswasalwayssuchthatstudentsfromU.S.minoritygroups madeupthemajorityofstudentsinthelounge.MoststudentswereChineseAmericanand TaiwaneseAmericanstudentsandsmallernumberswereAfricanAmerican,KoreanAmerican, IndianAmerican,andCaucasian.10Third,therewerealmostalwaysstudentsintheloungethat
10
Infall2009,womenmadeup45%oftheundergraduatepopulationatMIT(MIT). Itshouldbenotedherethat,AsianAmericanstudentsmakeupalargerpercentageoftheundergraduate
40
neverplayeddigitalgames,oranygames,atall.Thesestudentswereintheloungetosocialize orparticipateintheotheractivitiesthatwerehappening.Fourth,thetoneoftheloungeon weekendnightswasalwaysplayfulandsocial.Almosteveryactivityintheloungeduring weekendevenings,includinggaming,wasdonewiththeminimalamountofseriousness.Even cookingornegotiationsoversharedresources,asIwillshowbelow,werejovialandsocial eventsinthe5Nlounge. Inthischapter,Iwilldivedeeperintothespaceofthe5Nlounge,especiallytheactivitiesofthe studentswhomImetthere,andhowtheydefiedmyexpectations.First,Iwillexplainhowthe groupcanbeseenasaplaycommunitythat,asawhole,ismoreinterestedinsocializingand theplayprocessthaninwhowinsorlosesthegamestheyplay(DeKoven,2002;Pearce,2007). Second,Iwillexplorehowthe5Ncommunityexemplifiesaparticipatorycultureandhowthat contributestoitsinclusiveness(Jenkins,Purushotma,Weigel,Clinton,&Robinson,2009).
41
community. Rachel:Ifeellike5Nisalotmorethanagamingcommunitywhereweplaygames together.Wegotoconcertstogether,wegooutshoppingtogether,soit'salotmoreof afamilythanjustfriends. Rachelpointedoutthattherewasmoretotheirinteractionsthangamingtogether,andthese interactionsdidnotjusthappeninthe5Nlounge.Shegoesasfarastocallthegroupmorethan friendsandevenafamily,suggestingthatthebondsbetweenthegroups'memberswereas closeassiblingsorcousins.Eventhoughthe5Ncommunitywasnottechnicallyafamily, Rachel'sallusiontothefamilyherebringsupthequestion:Whatkindofspaceisthe5N lounge?Isitadomesticorworkspace?Isitpublicorprivate? Formanyofthestudentsthedormwastheircurrenthome.Itwaswheretheyslept,ate,and relaxed,butalsowheretheyspentcountlesshoursdoingtheirworkonproblemsetsand studying.Theywerefreeofparentalsupervision,mostlikelyforthefirsttime,andtheirfellow residentsweretheirfriendsandpeers.Inthedorms,theywerealsousuallyfreefromthe pressuresofhavingtolooktheirbestoractthesamewaytheywouldinclassoratanoutside socialevent.Yettherewerestrangersintheirmidst,otherstudentstheymightnotknowor peoplethattheydon'tlike,whichmadeitfeellesslikeatypicaldomesticspace.Theloungewas morepublicthantheirownrooms,butlesspublicthantherestofcampus.The5Nspacehad characteristicsofboththepublicworkplaceandtheprivatehome. Forthepurposesofthisthesis,itmightbebesttothinkofthelounge,andthedormthat housesit,asliminalspaces.Turner(1974)describesliminalspacesasplaceswherepeople
42
passthroughaperiodandareaofambiguity,asortofsociallimbowhichhasfew(though sometimesthesearemostcrucial)oftheattributesofeithertheprecedingorsubsequent profanesocialstatusesorculturalstates(p.57).Inthesespaces,people'play'withthe elementsofthefamiliaranddefamiliarizethem(p.60).Thedormandtheloungeweresites wherestudentsspentthetransitionaltimeofcollege,movingfromdependenceonparentsto dependenceonthemselvesandtheirsocialnetworks.Thelinebetweenadultandadolescent activitiesblurred.Studentscontinuedsomeoftheirfavoriteadolescentactivities,often socializing,playingdigitalgames,andjokingaround,butthepossibilityofnewresponsibilities, suchasmanagingrelationships,doinglaundry,andcookingdinnerwereincludedinthemix. The5Nloungebecamealiminallivingroomforthestudentswhouseit,setupmostlikelyin afashionsimilartotheirownfamilies'homeswiththeseatingcenteredaroundaTVand functioningasaplaceforpeopletogatherandinteract.Thisliminallivingroomwasfreefrom theinfluenceoffamily,however,allowingthemfreedomtoplaywithhowtheyinteractedwith eachother.Thismeanttheymighthavedonethingsthatnormallywouldn'tbeallowedat homewhetheritwastellingdirtyjokes,chasingeachotheraroundthecouches,orstayingup until4amplayingdigitalgames. Buttheloungefunctionedinmanywayslikeatraditionallivingroom.AsVoidaand Greenberg(2009)foundintheirownstudyoncolocatedconsolegaminginresidentialsettings, thecombinationofaTVandgamingsysteminaspacecanmakeitacomputationalmeeting place,whichnotonlybringspeopletogether,butalsomediat[es]amongthediversityof
43
expertise,interests,andidentitiesofthegamerswhohavebeenbroughttogether(p.1562). DigitalgamingattractedadiversecrowdofMITstudentstothelounge,includingthosewho hadnointerestinactuallyplayinggames,butlikedtointeractwiththeotherpeopleplaying andwatching.TheloungewasphysicallysetupwiththeTVasthefocalpoint.Allofthecouches andloungechairsfacedit.ThismeantthatactivitiesthatinvolvedtheTVusuallybecamethe maineventsinthelounge,withotheractivitiesgoingonaroundtheperiphery.Thepresenceof theTValoneinthe5Nloungedidnotcreateadiversityofexpertise,interestsandidentities, butinthisparticularcommunityitfunctionedasatechnologythatbroughtpeopletogether withinasocialcontextthatvalueddiversityandsocializing. Thestudentswhocametothe5Nloungesawthemselvesasfriends,andevenfamilyinsome cases,butIfoundthatthetermcommunitymostaptlydescribedtheirrelationshiptoone another.Putnam(2000)hasexplainedthat'[c]ommunity'meansdifferentthingstodifferent people,butthatmostpeopleviewtheircommunityastheirfamilyandfriends,followedby theircoworkersandneighbors(p.273275).Thestudentsin5Nwerebothfriendsand neighbors,withsharedintereststhatwerereinforcedbytheircloseproximity. Tobemorespecific,wecansaythestudentsin5Ncreatedaplaycommunity,aparticulartype ofcommunitythatplaysgamestogetherthatDeKoven(2002)hasdescribedinhisbook,The WellPlayedGame.Playcommunitiesrequiretimetocommonlybuildtrust,safety, conventions,andfamiliarity(DeKoven,2002,pp.1718).Thegamesplayedandwhowinsare notimportant.Playcommunitiescaremostaboutwhethertheplayershadfun.Heexplained:
44
We'llevenfindthatthekindofactivitieswegetinvolvedindon'tmatterthatmuch.Because ourbasisfortrustandsafetyhasbroadenedtosuchanextentthatitresidesnotinany particulargamebutinourveryrelationship(p.21). DeKoven'sdescriptionofplaycommunitiesisgeneralandnotnecessarilyrelatedtodigital games,butPearce(2007)hasbuiltonDeKoven'sconceptinherworkstudyingaparticular groupofpeoplewhoplayedtogetherintheanowdefunctmassivelymultiplayeronlinegame (MMOG): Theplaycommunitysharesastrongsocialconnection,aswellasamutualplaystylethat isbothinclusiveandflexible,andcanbetransformedandrelocatedasneededto sustainthegroup.Differentcommunitiesofplayhavedifferentcharacteristicsthatarise outofthecombinedplaystylesoftheindividualswithinthem,eachofwhomisinturn transformedbythegroupplaystyle.Theseplaystylesarealsobothinfluencedand transformedbythespacestheyareenactedin.(p.315) AsIinterviewedandinteractedmorewiththestudentsin5N,Icametounderstandthat insteadofacommunitybasedonplayingaparticularsetofdigitalgames,theyweremore alignedwiththeconceptofplaycommunities.Thestudentssharedastrongsocialconnection andsocializingwasthemostvaluedtypeofinteractioninthelounge.Theyhadcultivated relationshipswitheachotherovertheiryearandhalfoflivingtogetherthatwerebasedon trustandcomfort,eveninpotentiallycompetitivegamingsituations.Thissharedapproachto playtranscendedallthegamestheyplayed,aswellasmostotheractivitiestheyparticipatedin together.Thisisnottosaythatthegamestheyplayedwereinsignificant,but,asIwillshowin thenextchapter,thegamesfacilitatedtheirsocialgoals.
45
Socializingwasavaluedpartofeveryactivityinthe5Nlounge,fromhomeworktocookingto gaming.Conversationwasusuallyplayfulbetweenthefivetotwentystudentsthatwereinthe loungeatanygiventimeontheweekends.Therewerelayerstothesocializingthatconsistedof smallgroupsorpairsofstudentstalkinghereandthere,aswellasasharedongoing conversationthatwaslouderandcarriedacrosstheloungetoincludeeveryoneintheroom. ThislouderconversationusuallyconsistedofjokesaboutwhatwashappeningontheTV, whetheritwasvideogamesoraTVprogram;peopletellingfunnystories;andsometimeseven acouplepeoplebreakingintosong. Aboutfourmonthsintomyparticipantinterviews,Iinterviewedsomemaleplayersatthe dorm.Itwasatypicalnight.Inbetweenconductinginterviewsinasmallerloungedownthe hall,Iwentbacktothemainloungeandobservedstudentsinvolvedinseveraldifferent activitiesallwithaplayfultone.WhenIfirstarrived,fourpeople,includingLisa,werespread acrossthehallsideoftheloungemakingdumplings.Thiswasnotthekindofculinary productionyouwouldfindattheCordonBleuoreveninafamilykitchen.Instead,anassembly linehadbeencreatedgoingfromthekitchenwallanddowntothefloor,whereLisaand anotherstudentwerestuffingdumplingsaroundabigbowlonthecarpet.Thepeoplemaking thefoodwereconversingandjokingwiththeotherpeopleinthelounge,whowereplaying gamesorsittingaroundonlaptops.
46
Later,afterconductinganinterview,Icamebacktotheloungeandfoundaboutsevenpeople intermittentlyyellingatandlaughingwitheachother.Patandanothermalestudentwereat thewhiteboardbehindtheTVtryingtocalculatetheamountofmoneyeachpersonhadspent orowedforfoodthatweek.Somepeoplewereyellingoutnumberswhiletheotherswatched themcalculate.Itwasacomedyoferrors.Patandtheotherstudentswereconfused.The peoplewatchingthemyelledoutpossiblesolutions,creatingachaotic,butjovialmoodinthe lounge.Theeventculminatedwhenoneofthemalestudentslookedatthenumbernexttohis nameandsaidIowemyself$13!HowcanIowemyself$13?Everyonelaughedandwent backtowhattheyhadbeendoingpreviously,whiletwostudentseventuallyworkedoutthe mathontheboard. Thisnightexemplifiestheplayfultoneofmostactivitiesthatoccurredinthe5Nlounge.Evena negotiationovermoney,whichinanothercontextcouldbecometense,wasconductedasa lightheartedperformance.Bycreatingatoneinthespacethatisplayful,theloungebecomes approachablebyalmostanystudentwhopassesbyinthehall.Theloungewassometimesused likeastagetopullpassingstudentsin,oratleastentertainthemastheywalkedby. Afterobservingtheactivitiesintheloungeoverseveralmonths,itwasclearthatthemain socialgoalofthegroupwastoplayfullysocialize.Playandsocializinginthe5Ncommunity wereusuallyongoingandnotorientedtoasingulargoal.Theresultsoftheiractivitieswerenot emphasized.Theprocessofeachactivitywasdrawnoutanddoneinaplayfulandperformative
47
manner.Theresultsoftheactivitiesstillexisted,ofcourse,inthesituationsmentionedabove thestudentsintheloungeeventuallyatedumplingsandexchangedmoneyforfoodsupplies butachievingthesepracticalendswassecondaryinimportancetoentertainingeachotherand fosteringasocialcommunity. Theemphasisinthe5Ncommunityonaplayfulprocessovertheresultsofthegameisrelated tomychoicetodescribethegroupin5Nasaplaycommunityratherthanagamingcommunity. AsIshowedintheIntroduction,thetermplayhascometobevalueddifferentlythangame. Currentunderstandingsofthetermstendtosituateplayasanopenended,looselystructured activityandgamesasmorestructuredactivitiesthatareoftenassociatedwithhavinganend goalorwinstate.Ifweaccepttheseunderstandingsofthetermsfornow,astheyarethe dominantviewingamestudiesandthegameindustry,Iraisethequestion:Whatdoesfocusing acommunityonplayinsteadofacommunitythatgamesaffordtheparticipants? Themostapparentwaythe5Ncommunity'sfocusonplayshapedtheiractivitieswasthatthey wereabletoincorporateamuchwiderrangeofactivitiesandparticipantsthanwouldhave beenpossibleforacommunitystrictlyinterestedingaming.Loungevisitorshadmanyoptional activitiestotakepartindependingontheirimmediateneedsanddesires.Iftheyhadalotof worktodo,butwantedtounwindalittleandgetsomeaggressionoutwhiledoingit,theysat neartheTVandplayedBrawlwiththeirhomeworknearbytoworkonbetweenturns.Ifthey enjoyedreading,butwantedtobearoundpeople,theycouldsitinthenextrowofchairswith theirbookandinteractwhentheyfeltlikeit.Iftheywantedtojokeandinteractfacetoface
48
withtheirfriends,theycouldmakedinnertogetherorplayacardgame.Eachactivityallowed fordifferentneedstobefulfilled. Also,becausethecollectiveidentityofthe5Ncommunitywasbasedmoreonbeingagroupof friendswholikedtoplayfullysocializeratherthanbasedstrictlyongaming,theirgameplayhad lowerstakesthanothercommunitiesthatmakegamingtheirhighestpriorityandmainactivity. Statuswithinthe5Nplaycommunitydidnotdependsolelyonhowskillfulsomeonewasat winninggames.Theabilitytowinwasonlyonefactorthatshapedhowothermembers perceivedeachother.Moreimportanttothegroupwashowsocialapersonwasandhowthey contributedtomakingtheactivitiesfunandenjoyableforall.Thisemphasisonthecollective experienceofthegroupduringtheplayprocessinsteadofaccomplishmentsofindividuals helpedmaintainthelowstakessocialcontextforgaming. The5Ncommunityisanexampleofaonethatplacesparticularvalueontheplayprocessover whowinsorloses.ActivitiesthatfitunderSalenandZimmerman's(2004)definitionofgames arepopularinthelounge,buttheformalgoalsaredeemphasizedandreplacedwiththe group'ssocialgoals.Thisresultsinacommunitywherethebarrierstoparticipationingaming, eitherasaplayeroranobserver,arelowandthemembersofthecommunityarebothmale andfemaleandhavearangeofexperiencesplayinggames.Creatingtheselowerbarriersto participationareespeciallyimportantforencouragingpeoplewhoareunfamiliarwithorfeel excludedfromgamingtostarttoplay.
49
5Ncommunityasaparticipatoryculture Inadditiontobeingaplaycommunity,thestudentsinthe5Nloungecanbeseenasa participatoryculture,whichJenkinsetal.(2009)defineas: [A]culturewithlowbarrierstoartisticexpressionandcivicengagement,strongsupport forcreatingandsharingonescreations,andsometypeofinformalmentorshipwhereby whatisknownbythemostexperiencedispassedalongtonovices.Aparticipatory cultureisalsooneinwhichmembersbelievetheircontributionsmatter,andfeelsome degreeofsocialconnectionwithoneanother(attheleasttheycarewhatotherpeople thinkaboutwhattheyhavecreated)(pp.56). Initiallyusedasaconceptualframeworkforunderstandingfanpracticesaroundpopularmedia (Jenkins,1992),ithassincebeenappliedbyresearcherstootherfanandnonfanbased contextsbothonlineandoffline(Burgess,Green,Jenkins,&Hartley,2009;Driscoll,2009).Iuse participatorycultureasaframeworkforunderstandinghowthestudentsinthe5Ncommunity learnfromoneanotherandcreateasharedculture. Participatorycultureisaparticulartypeofsocialmodelthatisdifferentfromothermore hierarchicalandexclusivemodels.Inthecaseofthe5Ncommunity,theirfocusonplayful socializinghelpsthemcreateaninclusivecontextforgaming,butthefactorsthatcreatea participatoryculturesocialconnectionbetweenparticipants,lowbarrierstoentry,cultural productionofsharedtasteandknowledge,andaninformalmentorshipsystemhelpinsure thatallparticipantshavetheopportunitytolearnfromeachotherandaddtothecultureand knowledgeproductionofthecommunity Itshouldbefairlyobviousbynowthatthestudentsinthe5Nplaycommunityhadasocial
50
connectiontooneanother.Thiswaspartlyenabledbytheircloseproximitytoeachother. Manyexamplesofparticipatoryculturerelyonmediatedformsofcommunicationtoshare informationandresourcesespeciallywhenparticipantsarespreadacrossawidegeographic area(Burgessetal.,2009;Jenkins,1992;Taylor,2006).Thestudentsin5Nhadthebenefitof directaccesstooneanotherforplayinggames,collaborating,andsocializing.Theirconstant interactionsstrengthenedtheirtrustandaffectionforeachanother,makingthemfamilylike, asRachelexplained. Families,friends,andothercommunitiesareunderstoodtobesociallyconnectedgroups,but theyarenotbydefaultparticipatorycultures.Thesegroupscouldbehierarchicalorrunbyan elitesubgroupandexclusionary.Thiswasnotthecasewiththe5Ncommunity.Myown experiencecomingintothegroupasanoutsiderhelpedmeunderstandthelowbarriersthe grouphadforparticipation.Lisawasthefirstpersontobringmetothelounge,butonceIwas thereshewasn'trequiredtoexplainwhoIwastoanyone.Thishastodosomewhatwiththe factthatIamalreadyanMITstudentandinthesamedepartmentasLisa,butitalsoseemed thenormtohavefriendsoffriendscometotheloungefromtimetotime.Isatonthecouch thatfirstnightwatchingLisaandacoupleothersplayBrawl.Acouplepeopleintroduced themselvestomeandaskedmewhoIwas.EvenaftertheyfoundoutIwasagraduatestudent theydidn'tseemtowonderwhyIwasthere. WithinthirtyminutesofarrivingIwasofferedagamecontrollerwhenoneoftheplayersgotup todosomethingelse.IwarnedtheotherplayersIdidn'tknowhowtoplay,butIwasreassured
51
thatitdidnotmatterandIshouldjustpressthedownbuttonatthesametimeastheBbutton alot.Ilosteveryroundthatnight,andmostoftheroundsoverthenextcouplemonthsthatI visited,butIwasneverpreventedfromplayingorridiculedintheprocessoflearning.(Ialso hadalotoffun.)Partofthecommunity'sabilitytomaintainlowbarrierstoentryhadtodo withthekindsofgamesthatthestudentsplayed(whichIwilldiscussinthenextchapter),but myacceptanceinthegroupwasalsoconnectedtoknowingsomeonealreadyaffiliatedandmy abilitytosocializeandjokearoundwiththeotherstudentswhileIwasinthelounge. Itwasrelativelyeasyformetoparticipateinthe5Ncommunity,butwhatexactlywasI participatingin?Onthesurfaceitmightlooklikethestudentsarejusthangingout,not producinganythingofvalue,butItoetal.(2009)haveincludedhangingoutinarecentstudy ofyoungpeople'sdigitalmediausageasasignificantgenreofparticipation,inwhichyouth developanddiscusstheirtasteinmusic,theirknowledgeoftelevisionandmovies,andtheir expertiseingaming,practicesthatbecomepartandparcelofsociabilityinyouthculture(p. 44).Thisunderstandingofhangingoutinvolvespeoplemakingmeaningfrommediatexts whetheritsmusic,digitalgamesorInternetvideosandsharingtheirknowledgeand understandingsofthemwithoneanother. Atfirstinthelounge,Iwasn'tsurewhattomakeofthejovial,fastpacedconversationsthat tookplacethere.Ieventuallybegantolearnsomeofthereferencestheyusedandtheir recurringjokes.Thistalkwasimportanttocreatingthefeelingofacommunityandashared wayofcommunicating.ThiskindofconversationisaversionofwhatFiske(1992)calls
52
enunciativeproductivity.Inhisessay,TheCulturalEconomyofFandom,Fiskeproposesthree categoriesforthewaythatpeopleproducepopularculture.Thefirst,semioticproduction,is essentiallyinteriorandoccurswhenindividualsmakemeaningoutofsocialidentityand socialexperiencefromaspectsofculturalcommodities(forexample:amovie,adigitalgame,or themusicofaparticularartist)(p.37).Thenextcategory,enunciativeproductivity,iswhenthe meaningsmadearespokenandareshared,whetherit'sthroughconversationortheway someonechoosestodressorstyletheirhair(p.37).Thethird,whichwasrarerinthe5N community,istextualproductivity.Thisiswhenpeopleproduceanddistributetheirowntexts withintheircommunitythatdrawfromaparticularculturalcommodity(p.39).Textual productivityismostoftenassociatedwithfancommunities,butenunciativeproductivityisjust asimportantforcreatingsharedunderstandingsoftextsandculturalknowledgethatisvalued byothers. Thestudentswhohungoutinthe5Nloungewerenotfansofoneparticularcultural commodity.Theirinterestindigitalgameswaspartofalargermediaecologythatincluded socialnetworking,music,humorousInternetvideos,andmovies.Eachmemberofthe5Nplay communitybroughttheirownmixofexpertisethattheysharedwiththecommunity:some peopleknewmoreaboutgames,someknewaboutbiology,someknewaboutcooking.There wasaconstantflowofknowledgesharedabouthowtodothings,mediatocheckout,orevents toattend.Severaltimesmembersofthe5Nbunchtoldmetheyhadtriedoutadigitalgame becauseanotherpersoninthegrouphadsuggestedit.Jessica,whodidnotplaymanydigital gamesbeforecollege,wasturnedontotheplayingtheFireEmblemseriesofgamesafter
53
Jasonisopentosharinghistasteinmovieswiththegroupandthegroupisopentowatching whathebrings.IfpeoplecometotheloungewhilesomethingisplayingontheTV,theyfeel
welcometowatch.Forexample,onenightacouplestudentssuggestedweallwatchthemovie, PirateoftheCaribbean.Thiswasamoviesomestudentshadseenmanytimesandsome studentshadneverseen.Atfirst,onlysixpeoplewerewatching,butbytheendaboutseven morepeoplehadjoinedusfromjustpassingtheloungeandseeingthatthemoviewasplaying. Theseeventswerenotnecessarilydecideduponbyallthegroupmembersinadvance,but insteadnegotiatedbyindividualsandsmallgroupsinordertofitinwiththeotherongoing activitiesofthelounge. Ford(2006)hasexploredthemediaconsumptionpatternsforstudentsinanMITdormand foundthatcommunalviewingsareoneofthestaplesofthedormenvironment,wheremany peopledonothavetelevisionsandmustinsteadrelyonsharedviewingareas(p.37).The students'personalinterests,sharedspaceandsociabilityresultedinabackandforthof knowledgeaboutandusageofmusic,DVDs,games,consoles,andcountlessothermedia.This wasthecaseinthe5Ncommunityaswell.Thestudentsgatheredandsharedtheirknowledge
54
aboutarangeofmediatextsthroughvariousformsofdiscourseconversations,emails,jokes, andevenaFacebookpagewheretheysharedlinksbitsofwhichwerethenrepeatedand reincorporatedintothecommunity'sculture. Inadditiontomediarecommendations,moretraditionalconceptionsofknowledgewere sharedwhenstudentsdidhomeworkinthelounge.Whilethestudents,atthetime,were pursuingarangeofmajors,manyofthemhadattendedthesameclassesintheirfreshman year.Workingonproblemsetsfortheseclasses,whichstudentsareencouragedtocollaborate on,wasoneofthefirstactivitiesthatinitiallybroughtthestudentstothelounge.Theywere abletouseeachotherasresourceswhenproblemsweretrickyortheyhadadifferentareaof expertisetoshare.Duringonevisit,IobservedJanellesittingwithPatforoveranhourhelping himunderstandbiologyconceptsforaclasshewascurrentlyin,aclassshehadalreadytaken. Thisinstancealsoshowsthebenefitofhavingstudentsindifferentyearsaspartofthegroup, sincetheywereabletopassknowledgeontothenewerstudents. Janelle'shomeworkhelpwasonetypeofmentorshipthatgoesoninthecommunity,butthere wasalsomentorshiparoundgaming.Iunfortunatelywasnotabletotakeadvantageofthe informalmentoringsystemthatexistedinthe5Ncommunity,butifIhadbeenlivinginthe dorm,Imostlikelycouldhaveaskedfororbeenofferedmoreguidancefromsomeofthe members.Lisaexplainedhowshetookontheroleofthementorattimes: Yeah,Ihavealotoffriendswhogirlfriendswhowanttoactuallygetintogamingbut theyalwaysfeellikethey'regonnasuckatit,notbeanygoodanditstoohardtolearn andI'llhavetowaitforeveryoneelsetoleaveandinvitethemintotheroomtoplayand teachthemhowtoplayalittlebitbeforetheystarttoplaywitheverybodyelse. 55
Lisawasnotsecretlyhelpingthesewomenoutbecausetheywouldberidiculed,butbecause manywomanplayersthoughttheywouldbemadefunoforembarrassediftheywerentona competitiveskilllevelwiththeotherpeopleplaying.Thisanxietyaroundstartingtoplaydigital gamesandplayingwithothersmightstemfromplayers'previousexperienceofseeingortrying gaminginahigherstakescontext,butforthosewomenwhohadlittletonoexperiencewith digitalgaming,italsocouldhavebeeninfluencedbytheirunderstandingofwhoissupposedto play.Thesewomensawgamingthroughalensthatframesdigitalgamingasanactivityfor malesratherthanfemalesandanactivitythatrequiresplayerstohavetherightkindsofskills andcompetenciestoparticipate.Lisawasoneofthemostexperiencedplayersinthegroupand recognizedthatshehadknowledgetosharewithotherpeopleinthecommunitywhojoined withoutmuchgamingexperience.Addingtoherabilitytomentorotherfemalestudentswas thatshewasoneofthefewwomeninthegroupwhohadherownconsolethatshekeptinher room.ThisallowedLisaandanyoneshementoredeasyandprivateaccesstopracticedigital games,freefromanyrealorimaginedoutsidepressures. The5Nplaycommunitywasinmanywaysaparticipatoryculture.Buthowdoesthisrelatetoa community'sinclusiveness?Thesocialconnectionsandknowledgesharingthattookplacein thegroupcouldalsohappeninmanyothercontexts.Themostimportantfactorsof participatoryculturethatmadethiscommunitymoreinclusivethanmanygroupswhoplay gamestogetherthatwemightconsidernonparticipatoryweretheirlowbarrierstoentry andtheinformalmentorshiptheyhadcreated.Noteverygroupwhoplaysgamesisableor willingtoplaywithnewplayers.Thisisespeciallytrueifplayersaremostinterestedinbuilding 56
Conclusion Ihaveyettoexplainindetailhowthe5Ncommunityplayedgamestogether.Thereisareason forthis:Thestudentsin5Nwereacommunitycenteredaroundplay,notgames.Theywerea playcommunityandaparticipatoryculture,bothofwhichinfluencedtheirinclusiveness. Playingdigitalgameswasoneoftheirfavoriteactivities,butitwaspartofanetworkof activitiesthatwereavailabletoparticipatein.Membersofthecommunitywhodidn'twantto playgameshadotherwaystheycouldinteractwiththosewhodidplay.Bynotidentifyingtheir communitystrictlywithgaming,theycreatedalowstakesenvironmentforthosewhoarehad lessexperienceplayingdigitalgames. Thesharedgoalofplayfullysocializingshapedalloftheinteractionsinthelounge.The5N communitycreatedaspacewheretheycouldrelaxandbeproductive.Whatmatteredtothe studentswasaplayfulandsocialprocess.Intheend,therewereresultstomostactivities,but theywerenotasvaluedascreatingsocialtiesandmakingeachotherlaugh.Thisisnottosay theydidn'tshareknowledge.Infact,thestudentswereconstantlysharinginformationand
57
58
CHAPTERTWO:GamesandGamePlay
Iinitiallystartedmyresearchinthe5Nloungebecauseitwasasitewherewomenplayed digitalgamestogether.Whilethestructureofthegamesthestudentsin5Nplayedwassimilar toothersthatgroupsplaytogether,itwaswhattheyvaluedduringgameplaythatmadethis groupdifferent.JasonexplainedhisapproachtoplayingBrawl,themostpopulardigitalgamein thelounge: InBrawlIdon'tplaythatintenselytobeginwith...Ithinkthebestanalogywould be...whentwokidsswordfight,they'renottryingtosmackeachotherthey'retryingto createasengagingorexcitinginteractionpossible.Youdon'tseethemswingingforeach otheryouseethemswingingforeachother'sswords,youtrytocreateasenseofbeing cool.Nosenseofhostility.Withgamingalotofpeopleplaytowin.They'llhaveallthe tacticsdownandunbeatablecombos.WhenIplay,Iplaytohavefun.Winningisstillthe objective,butIdon'tseetheneedtotakeittooseriously.Fightingtofight,notfighting towininBrawlatleast.
Gamesandsocialgoals Towardstheendoftheweek,gamingactivityincreasedinthelounge.Studentsusuallyhad moretimeforplayingThursdaysthroughSundays,asclasseshadendedfortheweekand homeworkandstudyingcouldbeputonhold.Thethreemostpopulartypesofgamesplayedin theloungewereBrawl;atricktakingcardgame,Tractor;andaWesternthemedcardgame, Bang!.Iwillnotattempttoanalyzethegamesintheirentiretyinthisthesis,butIwillfocuson thegameelementsthatfacilitatedplayfulsocializingandhowthegameswereplayedinthe lounge. Thestructureofgamesisoftenseenaslessflexiblethanthesocialrulesandnormsthat surroundgameplay.Thisisbecausedigitalgamestendtobeprogrammedtoallowonlycertain actions,andcardgamesusuallyhavecodifiedrulesthatarepasseddown,agreedupon,and 60
meanttobefollowed.Yet,thethreemostpopulargamesinthe5Ncommunitywereflexible enoughthatstudentscouldnegotiatethegameplaytosupportthesociabilityofthelounge andmaintainaplayfulmood.Taylor(2006)hasfoundsimilarflexibilityandnegotiationinher workonplayersinMMOG's.Despitethecommonnotionthatcomputergameslockdown modesofplayviathesystem,rulesandnormscanbe,especiallyinthecaseofMMOG's, incrediblycontextual,sociallynegotiated,heterogeneous,ambiguous,andquiteoften contradictorybetweenplayers(p.157).Taylor'sunderstandingoftherelationshipofthe structureandthesocialcontextofgamesisoneofconstantinteraction,withneitherableto functionseparatelyfromtheotherandbothinfluencingoneanotherthroughoutgameplay. Beforetalkingabouttheactualstructureandcontentof5N'sgames,itisimportanttohavea frameworkforunderstandinghowtheyarerelatedtothecommunity'ssocialgoalsandgame play.Juul(2010)hasaskedthequestion:Ifasharedunderstandingofgoalsispartofhowwe playmultiplayergames,howdoesthisinfluencethewayweplay?(p.126)Inordertoanswer thisquestion,Juuloffersthreeconsiderationsforevaluatingagameaction: Frame1:ThegameasgoalorientationDesiretowin Frame2:ThegameasexperienceDesireforaninterestinggame Frame3:Thegameasasocial,normalcontextDesireformanagementofasocial situation(p.127)
Juuldrawsthesethreeconsiderationsasboxesofdifferentsizes.Frame1isthesmallest
agamecanexistatthesametimeandtovaryingdegrees. Withthisframework,Juuloffersconsiderationstoweighwhentryingtounderstandanactiona playertakesinagame.Hesuggestsanambiguityexistsinmultiplayergamesspecifically because:theysimultaneouslycarryanotionofanoblecontestandhaveawiderangeof undeterminedsocialconsequences,ofmeanings(p.122).Oftenthesocialrulesinagaming contextareunderstood.Ifyouplayadigitalgamealoneandbreakarule,thecomputerwill usuallyletyouknowbecauseitisprogrammedtogiveyoufeedback,butifyoubreakasocial ruleduringagame,apersonmayormaynotletyouknow.Theplayersmaynothavemadethe socialrulesexplicitatthebeginningofthegame.Afterexplainingtherelevantstructural elementsofeachofthethreegames,IwillcallonJuul'sframeworktohelpexplainhowthese elementsinteractedwiththesocialcontexttoshapetheplayers'motivations. SuperSmashBros.Brawl Iknewfrommyinterviewsthatstudentsinthe5Nloungeindividuallyplayedarangeofvideo andonlinegames,butIwassurprisedthatinallmyvisitsIonlyobservedthemplayingone digitalgameasagroupSuperSmashBros.Brawl.Ididobserveacoupleofpeopleplaying othergamesontheirownlaptops,suchasJasonplayingDiablo211andafemalestudentIdidn't interviewplayingJadeDynasty12.Alsosomeofthe5NstudentswouldgotoLisa'sroom periodicallytoplayRockBand13together.However,inthelounge,Brawlwastheobviousgroup
11 12
62
Figure3TVscreeninthe5NloungeduringaBrawlbout.
canbeplayedcompetitivelyorcollaboratively.
63
ThebasicgameplayofalltheSmashBros.gamesiscenteredaroundfightingboutsbetweenup tofourplayersthatareplayedonstagesinspiredbythebackgroundsofotherNintendogames. Thegamescanbesingleormultiplayerandhavedifferentmodesofplaytochoosefrom.Ina bout,playerschooseacharactertoplayandmanipulatethecontrollerwithsimpledirection andbuttoncombinationslikeUp+Bbuttontomaketheirchosencharacterdodifferent movesthatattackotherplayers.Whenacharacterishit,theirdamagemeter,whichis measuredasapercentage,increasesfrom0%andtheyarethrownintotheair.Asthedamage increases,aplayeristhrownfartherfromthebattleareaandhastorecover,sometimessaving themselvesfromfallingoffthestage.Aplayerlosesalifeiftheyfalloffthestageoriftheir damagereachesacertainthreshold,whichthrowsthemsofartheycannotrecover.Playersare giventhreelives,butwhentheylosethethird,theyareoutofthegame.Thelastplayerlefton thestagewinsthebout.Thestatisticsfromthebout,includinghowmanyknockouts(KO's)you causedtootherplayers,areshownonascreenaftertheboutends. Characters
64
Figure4TVscreenin5NloungeshowingBrawlcharacterselectionscreen.
EachcharacterinBrawlwaspartofanotherstorylineintheiroriginalvideogame.Forexample Mario,Luigi,PrincessPeach,Bowser,andYoshiappearedintheclassicSuperMarioBros.series ofgamesandeachhadaspecificrolesuchashero,sidekick,damselindistress,andvillain. Pikachu,PokemonTrainer,andJigglypuffarewellknownforbeingcharactersfromPokemon games,TVshows,movies,andtradingcards.SamusisthemaincharacterinthegameMetroid andoneofthefewfemalecharacterstobetheprotagonistofagame.Playerswhoarefamiliar withthestoriesofthesecharactersinothergamessometimesrecallandincorporatethemas theyplaySmashBros.games.Jakobsson&Akira(2007)havereferredtothepracticeof incorporatingcharactersfromdifferentgamesintoanothergameasintermediagameplay.He questionstheassumptionthatgamesareclosedsystemswhereweleaveagamingsession withnothingmorethanthesatisfactionofwinningorfrustrationoflosing(p.388).Instead, playerscarrythestoriesandtheirownmemoriesofplayingthecharactersinthepastwhile theyplayinanewscenariooftheSmashBros.series.Iwillshowhowstorylinesforcharacters
65
ThenicknamePedoisshortforpedophile.Thestudentsin5Ncameupwiththisnickname becauseofastereotypeofpedophilesasbeingmenwhohavemustachesandsuggestivebody language.Inthegame,thecharacterLuigihasamustacheandanattackthatlookslikeaballet movethatthestudentsfoundweird.Theyhavecreatedanicknameforapinkversionofthe characterCaptainFalconthatusesthewordfabulous,whichisstereotypicallyassociatedwith homosexualmen.Thesenicknamesdonotmaketheplayersmorelikelytolose,butfrommy observationstheydidmakethecharacterslesslikelytobechosenbyplayers,unlessthey wantedtobethefocusofjokesduringplay,whichsomeplayersdiddofromtimetotime.14 Anothertermusedduringgameplayisspam.Thistermisalsousedinothervideogaming contextstodescribewhenaplayerattacksotherplayersingamerepeatedlywithoutgiving theiropponenttimetocounterattack.InthecaseofBrawl,thiscanhappenwhenacharacter hasamovethatcanattackothercharactersfromfaraway.MeiandJessicaexplainedtheyuse
14
66
anamepunforLisa'sfavoritecharactertoplay,Samus: Mei:WecallSamusSpamus Jessica:CauseSamusisveryeasytospam,causeshehasliketwomissileattacks. Interviewer:Waitwhat'sspamming? Jessica:Youjustkeepdoingthesamemoveoverandoveragain. Mei:Justkeeponattackingwiththesamemoveandsomepeoplegetstuckinitand theygetmad. IwassurprisedtofindoutthatotherplayersmadejokesaboutLisaandherfavoritecharacter forspammingbecausesheseemedlikearespectedandskilledplayerwhensheplayed.When Ifirststartedplayingthegamewithher,shewonoftenandIdidn'trealizetherestofthegroup didnotappreciateoneofhertechniques.Iwilldiscussthe5Nrelationshiptospammingin thelatersectionongamecontrols. Finally,thenumberofcharactersavailableallowedmostplayerstovarytheirexperiencefrom bouttobout.Someplayerschosethesamecharactersalmosteverytimebecausetheyhad learnedtheirspecificattacksandfeltmostcomfortableplayingthem.Someplayerslearned characters'movesbyplayingdifferentmodesofthegame(mostlikelyattimeswhenthere weren'tmanypeopleinthelounge): Jason:AlsowithJessica,thatwaskindofforced,likeHey,Jessicawillyouhelpmego throughSubspaceEmissary?...theadventuremodeinSmash.Itcanbetwoplayer.The thingisyoudon'tgettochooseyourcharacter,ineachscenarioyouhaveacoupleto choosefrom.Thatkindofforcedhertolearnhowtoplay. Otherplayerschosedifferentcharacters,orevenusedtherandomchoicewhenplayingto mixuptheirexperienceandpracticethemovesofdifferentcharacters.Ifplayerswantto challengethemselvesmoreinBrawl,theycanswitchtoanothercharactertheyarelessfamiliar with,whichhelpedevenoutboutswhereplayers'skilllevelsvaried.Thiswasalwaysthechoice
67
oftheplayerandwasmorelikelytobedonebythemoreexperiencedplayers.
Modes Brawlallowsplayerstochoosebetweenseveralmodes,including;asoloadventuremodethat integratesboutsintoanarrative;aclassicsolomodethatletsyouplaythroughallthestagesof thegamebattlingtheothercharacters;andamultiplayerbrawlmodethatletsplayersbattle eachotherinselfcontainedboutsthatvaryinlengthbutusuallylastseveralminutes.The brawlmodewasthemostpopularmodeIsawplayedinthe5Nlounge.Thismodeallows playerstoplayaneverendingstringofbouts.In5N,theboutswerealwaysselfcontained.I neversawthemplayinatournamentstylewherethewinnermovesonandlosershavetowait theirturntoplayagain.Thismeantthatplayerswereabletoeasilyjoininorleavethegame betweenboutsbecausetheresultsdidn'tmatterandgameplayhappenedinshortbursts. Winningorlosingdidn'tfactorintowhetherornotyoucouldplay,buttherewaspersistent knowledgethatcarriedoverfromgamingsessiontogamingsessionaboutwhowasskilledat playingwhichcharacterandhowsomepeopleplayedcertaincharacters. AsJakobsson&Akira(2007)foundintheirresearchwithSmashBros.MeleeplayersinSweden, itisnotjusttheprogrammedrulesofthegamedesignthatdeterminehowagameisplayed. Instead,therulesareinfluencedby,andaffect,thesocialandculturalaspectsofthegaming context(p.386).TheyobservedclubsthatmetandplayedMeleeindifferentways,includinga randomtournamentstylewhereavarietyofsocialruleswereaddedinadditiontothe programmedboutrules.Aftereachbout,thewinnerswouldhavetheirnamesplacedinahat toplaymorebouts,andlosersweregivenachancetotrytogetasixfromrollingdice.Ifthey 68
rolledasix,theirnameswerealsoplacedinthehattocontinueplaying.Thiselementincreased therandomnessofwhocontinuedplaying.InsertingmorerandomnessintheSwedishconsole clubboutswerenotpartofthegamedesign,butwereaddedbymembersasawayofevening outtherangeofskilllevelsintheclub.Theroleofrandomnessisdiscussedmoreinthecontrols section. In5N,therewerenotasmanysocialrulesaddedtoBrawlasJakobssonandAkirafoundintheir study,buttheflexibilityofbeingabletojoinorleavewhenevertheplayerwantedtofitwith thesocialgoalsofthegroup.The5Ngrouphadsociallyconstructednormsaroundhowbouts areplayed.Ifacontrollerwasfree,anyonecouldjoinin.Whetheryoulostorwon,itdidn't matter,youcouldkeepplaying.Ifsomeonewaswatchingthegamewhileyouplayedandyou wantedtogodosomethingelseyouofferedthemthecontroller.Theplayersoftenchanged throughoutthenight,andthegamingneverbuilttoanultimateresolutionofwhowonthe mostbouts. Controls ThecontrolsofBrawlarerelativelysimplecomparedtomoretraditionalfightinggames,like TekkenandStreetFighter.Thesetwogames,andseveralotherslikethem,requireplayersto memorizeandexecutelongcombinationsofbuttons,calledcombos,thatallowtheir characterstoexecuteaseriesofcomplicatedattacks.InBrawl,mostattacksrequirepressing oneactionbuttonatthesametimeaspressingadirection.Theselesscomplicatedcontrolsare importanttogamingparticipationbecausetheylowerthebarriertoentry. 69
IcanusemyownexperienceasanexamplesinceIhadneverplayedBrawlbeforevisitingthe 5Nlounge.IwasgiventheinstructionstoPressBanddownwhenIwasfirstofferedthe controller.WhatIwasdoingthefirstcouplesessionswouldbeconsideredbuttonmashing apejorativetermforwhenanewplayersimplyhitsallthebuttonswithoutknowingwhatthey do.AsIplayedmore,tryingBanddownandsimilarcontrolvariationswithotherbuttonsand directions,IwasabletofigureoutdifferentmovesforthecharactersIplayed.Itwasn'tlong beforeIwasabletoperiodicallyKOothercharacterscontrolledbythoseinthegroupwhohad moreexperience.Theeasytolearncontrolsmademyexperienceplayingthegameenjoyable soonerthanifIhadtolearnlonganddifficulttoexecutecombos.Thesimplercontrolsalso allowedmetocontinuesocializingduringthegamebecauseIdidn'thavetoconcentrateon executingcomplicatedbuttoncombinations. ThereisdebatearoundwhetherornottheSmashBros.gamesshouldbeconsideredpartofthe fightinggamegenremadepopularbyarcadeandvideogameslikeStreetFighterandTekken. ThereareseveralaspectsoftheSmashBros.gamesthataredifferentfromthesegames, includingmorecomicviolence,morethantwocharactersbattlingatonce,andtheoptionto turnonitemswhichgivecharactersmorepowerfulattacks.AdiscussiononaGameSpot.com forumentitledSuperSmashBros.gamesarenotfighting...(AnemicAnd_Sweet,2008) presentsaquotefromaNintendoPowereditorsayingBrawlisnotafightinggame.The forumposterusesthisquoteasevidencetoprovetoBrawlplayersthatthegameisn'tmeant tobeconsideredapartofthesamegenreofdigitalgames.Respondentstothepostcomment backandforthaboutwhetheritshouldorshouldn'tbeconsideredafightinggame,butit
70
becomesobviousthatthegenrecategorizations(likethetermsgameandgamerasI'll showinthenextchapter)arerelativetoplayers'experienceandcontext. JasonbelievedthatthesimplercontrolsmadeBrawlbetterthanmostfightinggames: [Brawl]ismoresophisticatedthananyotherfightinggame.Ilikesimplicityinagame.I likesimplicitybutyetstillchallenging,soitsnotlikeDoratheExplorerwhohasto arrangemonkeysbycolor.It'snotthatsimplicitySocompareSmashtoTekken,orSoul Caliber,orStreetFighterwhereyouhavetomemorizecombosandinputthemcorrectly. Smashisveryformulaic.It'seasytopickup.Butyetthegoodplayerscanstillblow withthesameknowledgeofthegameblowasmallerfishoutofthewater. ForJason,sophisticationinagamemeantabalancebetweensimplicityandchallenge,whichhe foundinBrawl.Thesimplercontrolsinvolvedstrategyandskilltobeusedeffectivelytobeat opponents.JasonimpliesthatBrawl'slackofemphasisoncombos,whichrequirecomplicated handeyecoordinationandmemorization,allowplayerstofocusmoreonhowtobestusethe attacks.Thereisnoneedtotapinalongcombowithinstricttimelimitations,butyoudohave toknowwhentouseanattackonwhichplayer,whichrequiresthinkingahead,knowingwhat theotherplayersaredoing,andothercharacter'sstrengthsandweaknesses. ThedebatearoundwhetherornotSmashBros.gamesarefightinggamesornotisalsorelated toconceptionsofskillindigitalgames.Withoutgoingintogreatdetailabouttheroleofskill andchanceingames,whichhasbeenstudiedelsewhere15,itisacommonperceptionthatthe moreagameisbasedonchanceorrandomness,thelessskillisrequiredforwinning.Thisis becauseskillisrelatedtothedecisionsplayersmakeinagame,andchanceisbeyondplayers'
15
SeeBrathwaitheandSchreiber(2008)andSalenandZimmerman(2004)
71
influence.Forpeoplewhoplaygamescompetitivelyandhighlyvaluewinning,itisimportantto playgamesthatrequireskillbecausetheresultofplayers'decisionscanbemappedtohow goodorbadtheyareatthegame. Brawlisdifferentfromotherfightinggamesbecauseplayerscanallowitemstoappearduring theboutsthatstrengthencharacters'attacks.Theseitemsaddelementsofrandomnessinto thegame.Lisaexplainedherviewofitemstomeinanemail: Iwouldsaythemostrandomizing/equalizingpartofBrawlwouldbetheitems.They rangefromPokeballsthatsummonPokemontokillotherplayers,tofoodforhealth regeneration,tosmartbombs,etc.ThebiggestiteminBrawlistheSmashBall,which basicallygivestheplayerwhoreceivesitaspecialmove.There'ssomeskillinvolvedin efficientlyusingyourspecialmove...AlmosteveryoneI'veeverplayedBrawlwithplayed withitemsforaboutaweek,justtoseealltheSmashBallpowers,thenturnedthemoff toremoveasmuchrandomnessfromthegameaspossible.
Lisareferredtotheitemsasequalizingbecausetheycouldbeespeciallyhelpfultoplayers
whohadlessexperiencewiththegameorhadfallenbehindinthebout.Allowingitemscould beawaytoequalizethegameplaybetweenplayersofdifferentskilllevelsandmake participationmoreinclusive.Thisassumesthoughthatthereisn'tskillinvolvedingrabbingand usingtheitemsinabout.Inthecaseof5N,thestudentsfoundtheitemsdidn'tmakethegame playmoreequalized,asLisadescribed: Weturnedoffitemsinourmatchesmostlybecauseitmadethegamealittletoochaotic (especiallywhentryingtoteachsomeonenewhowtoplay)andtherewouldbe instanceswhereoneplayerwouldconstantlymanagetogetthesmashball/itemsand killeveryoneoverandoveragain.Wefoundthegamesweremoreenjoyablewhenwe wereabletofocusontheonevs.onemechanicswithouthavingtoworryaboutsome randompersonthrowingapokeballatthebackofourheads. Inthiscase,eventhoughthegaminginthe5Nloungetendedtobeinclusiveofdifferentskill levels,theyfoundthatusingitemsinboutsdidnotfitwiththeirmotivationsforplayingand 72
wereeventuallyturnedoff.Theitemswerebeingusedbyplayerswhocouldgrabthemfirst andusethemtodominatethebouts,keepingotherplayersfrombeingabletowin.Winning, whileitmightnothavebeentheprimarygoaloftheindividualplayersin5N,wasn'tirrelevant. Ifthesamepersonwoneverytimeitbecamealessfunprocessforallinvolvedandnolongerfit withthegroup'ssocialgoalofplayfullysocializing.Whatwasmoreimportantaboutthe inclusionofitemsinthegamestructureofBrawlwasthattherewastheoptiontoturnthe itemsoff.Thismeantthatplayerscouldmodifythegametofitwiththeimmediatemotivations andcontextsofthegameandchoosewhethertoturntheitemsonoroffaccordingtohowit wouldfacilitatethesocialgoalsofthe5Ncommunity. AlsorelatedtoskillingamesisthetechniqueImentionedabovecalledspamming.Itis possibletowinboutsbyspamming,butitwasnotseenasatechniquethatrequiredskill. Howmuchplayersvaluedskillvaried.Someoftheplayersintheloungesaidthattheyspam, butthatitwasn'tabigdealin5Nbecausewinningandlosingwasn'ttakentooseriously.Rachel hadasimilarexperiencetomyownSmashplaying: Ididn'tstartplayingSmashuntilIgothereaswell,andbackthenitwaslikebutton mashing.CausetheywerelikehereholddownBandIwaslikeitsnotworking...SoI'd spamacertainattack.They'dmakejokesaboutit,butintheenditwaslike,Goodjob, Thanksforplaying. Someplayersexpressedadislikeforspammingintheirinterviews,butIneverhearditbrought upinawayduringgameplaythatwouldmakesomeonefeellikeitwasn'tallowed.Therewere jokesthatpointedtoitasatacticthatrequiredlessskill,butnooneeverfeltliketheywere breakingtherulesiftheywonbyspamming.Ifitmeantthatpeoplecouldmakeajokeabouta characterorbout,thenitaddedtothegameandthatwaswhatmattered.Aswesawbefore, 73
Wittybanterandtrashtalk Forthemostpart,thesocializingduringgameplayinthe5Nloungebouncedbackandforth betweenconversationaboutthegamebeingplayedandmoregeneralconversationwith peoplewhowerenotplaying.Intermsofconversationaboutthegame,themostprevalent typesofplayersocialinteractionrelatedtothegameswerewittybanterandplayfultrash talking.Thesetypesofconversationaroundthegameconsistedofplayersyellingattheir characterandotherplayers'charactersonthescreen,exclaimingYes!orNo!atsurprising actionsinthegame,andcommunicatingtheiringamegoalstootherplayers. Trashtalkhastraditionallybeenatermfortheactoftradingofinsults,oftenoffensiveor crude,betweenplayersduringsportingevents.Itiscommonlyassociatedwithprofessional sports,especiallybasketballandfootball.EveslageandDelaney(1998)characterizedtrashtalk andotherformsofinsulttalkashavingcertaintraitsincluding:theycontinuouslystressand establishhierarchies;theyinvolvepersonalinsultsorputdowns,oftenascallstodefend masculinityandhonor;andtheyoftendegradeobjectsdefinedas'feminine'(p.241).While thischaracterizationisthecaseinhigherstakesgamingandsportingenvironments,trash talkinginthe5Nloungeservedadifferentpurpose.
74
Thetrashtalkinthe5Nloungewasbynomeansascrudeormeanspiritedasitcanbeinmore seriouscontexts,butitdidplayonsimilarconventions.WhenIfirstvisitedthelounge,Ithought theyellingbetweenplayerswassimilartotraditionaltrashtalk.AsIobservedandtalkedto morestudents,itbecameclearthattheexchangesweremuchmoreperformativeandlight heartedthancanbeobservedatsportingeventsorinonlinegaming.Insteadofseriously insultingeachother,theplayersin5Nperformedrolesofmoreaggressiveplayers.Theyused phrasesandtookonattitudesthatareusedinauthentictrashtalkinginstances,butperformed theminoverthetopways,directingthematthecharactersonthescreeninsteadoftheother players.Thecontentofwhattheysaidwasnotmeanttooffendanyone,butinsteadmeantto entertaintheotherplayersandtheotherpeopleinthelounge. Thistypeofbanterstartedbeforetheloungewasahubforgaming.Janelleremembered hearingAndres,thesenioronthefloorwhohassincegraduated,oftenyell,Screwyou Pikachu!fromhisroomtheyearbeforepeoplestartedplayingBrawlinthelounge.Someof theplayersagreedthathewasthepersonwhostartedthebanteringduringthegame. Pat:AlotofitstartedwithAndres.Theemotionaloutburstsarenotdirectedatthe players,butusuallythecharactersthemselves.LikeAndreswhenheplayed,andhis characterswoulddosomethinghedidn'tlike,he'dbelike,Pikachu! Interviewer:Soit'sindirect,you'retrashtalkingtothethingonthescreen? Pat:There'salotoflike,Yourface!...Someonewilljustsaysomething. Interviewer:That'sunderstood? Pat:Yeah,it'sunderstood,likethesentimentof,Yourfaceisunderstood. Interviewer:Whataretheotheroutbursts?... Pat:...AgoodexamplefortrashtalkiswhenwewereplayingMarioKartlastyear,we wereplayingaparticularcoursewherethere'strafficandAndreswasdrivingandabout totakefirstplace,andsomethinghithim...andhe'sjustlike,Whatthehell!You'reas bigastheworld!Justrandomoutburststhatwekeptinourcollectivememories... Thetrashtalkin5Nwasindirectandplayful,whichmadeitlessthreateningtobothnewand 75
experiencedplayers.Playersrarelylookedatoneanotherwhileplayingabout,directingall theircommentsatthescreen.Exclamationscouldbesparkedbyrealfrustrationsduringgame play,butinawaythattargetedthecharactersonthescreen,nottheotherplayers.The5N playersprojectedtheirfrustrationsontothecharactersonthescreenandmadethegameplay intoaperformanceforanyoneintheloungetoobserveorinteractwith. Someplayerstrashtalkedmorethanothers,anditwasnotclearwhythiswas.Itdidnotseem toberelatedtogender.AllofthewomenwhoplayedfrequentlyMei,Jessica,andLisawere activetrashtalkers,aswasPatandmostoftheothermalestudentswhoplayed.Playingability wasalsonotadeterminantastowhethersomeoneparticipatedinthebanter,thoughif someonewasplayingpoorlytheyweremorelikelytosaysomethingdisparagingabouttheir owncharacterandcallattentiontotheirstrugglesthantotalktrashanothercharacter. Imentionedearlierthatsometimescharacters'storylinesfromotherNintendogamescarried overintoabout.AnexampleofthisoccurredwhenwewereplayingBrawlonenight.Jasonwas playingLinkandLisawasplayingZelda,bothcharactersfromtheLegendofZeldaseries. ThroughouttheZeldaseries,LinkisusuallyonaquesttosavePrincessZelda,butshehasalso beenabletofightforherselfinsomegames.WhilemanyfansoftheZeldaserieshavetheir ownreadingsofaromanticrelationshipbetweenLinkandZelda,theevidencefromthegames mostlyleavestheirstatusambiguous. ThisambiguitywasreferencedduringthetrashtalkofaBrawlboutinvolvingJason,Lisa,and
76
myself.JasonasLinkwastargetingLisaasZelda,whichpromptedLisatosayjokinglytoJason, Don'tbeatupyourgirlfriend!Thiswassaidinhopesthathemightstopattackingher characterforawhileandbattlesomeoneelse.Instead,Jasonresponded,Girlfriend?!Zeldais thebiggestteasethissideofPeach!(PeachistheprincessMarioistaskedwithsavinginmost oftheSuperMariogames.)Thisexchange,whichisalsosignificantintermsofgenderrole expectations,transferstheplayers'readingsofcharactersrelationshipsintothenewcontextof aboutinBrawl.Lisareferencesapossibleemotionalrelationshipbetweenthecharactersin anothergameasaplayfulverbaldefensetogetJasontoleavehercharacteralone,playingon thehelplessfemalestereotype.Jasonretortswithahumorousandcynicaltakeonthe characters'relationship,andthenaddsinsulttoinjurybycallingLisa'scharacteratease.Lisa didnottakeoffensetothecomment,butinsteadlaughed.Shetookitasanattackonthe character,notonherownactionsorherpositionasawoman. ThereweresomepeopleintheloungethatdidnotplayBrawl.Thismeantthatnoteveryone foundplayingthegameenticingorenjoyable,buttheydidenjoythebanterthattheycould participateinaroundBrawlinthelounge.Janelle,whomIoftensawtalkingorreadingwhile otherpeoplewereplayingBrawlhadnodesiretoplay,butlikedthatthegameplayinthe5N loungehadmadethespacemoresocial: Interviewer:Doesn'titbotheryouthattherearegamesgoingon? Janelle:Ilikethenoise,itbringsmorepeopleouttothelounge. Interviewer:Doyoulikewatchingthegames? Janelle:Occasionally,butusuallyIhaveabooktoread,whichismuchmore interesting.Myeffectsarebetterthantheireffects.(Pointstoherhead.) FromJanelle'scommentsweseeplayingdigitalgamesmightnotbeeveryone'sfavoriteactivity,
77
Roleofcompetition Thetrashtalkandwittybanterthattookplaceinthe5Nloungewereplayfulwaysforthe studentstocompetewitheachother.Mostofthestudentsenjoyedcomingupwithwitty commentsorlaughingatlightheartedinsultsdirectedatcharacters.However,manystudents alsofoundpleasureinwinning.Studentsin5Noftenexpressedtheirenjoymentofwinningor disappointmentinlosing,butthetypeofcompetitionthatwaspresentintheloungewas differentthanothermorehighstakescontexts. JensonanddeCastell(2008)havesuggestedthattheveryideaof'competition,'forexample, isbothgenderedandcontestable(p.17).Theygoontoshowintheirownresearchofgirls whoplaydigitalgames,thatasplayers,girlsareverymuchcompetingandenjoyingit,butthat itisadifferentkindofcompetitionthatistypicallyassociatedwithgameplay.Theyusethe termbenevolentcompetitiontoexplainhowthegirlscompetewithoneanotherwhilealso supporting,encouraging,andevenhelpingtheirplaymatestosucceedinthegame(p.17).In anotherarticle,Jenson,deCastell,andFisher(2007)describedthiskindofcompetitionthey observedinagroupofgirlsplayingthevideogameSuperMonkeyBallas: ...nevertoodirect,alwayssomewhatsupportiveandrarely(inonlyonecaseinallthe hoursofvideo)meanttounderminetheplayerwhowasahead...Whentheydid 78
competedirectlywithoneanother,theywouldmostoftennotcommentonwhetheror nottheircompetitorwasa'good'or'poor'gamer,butwouldinsteadbemoredirectly relatedtowhatwashappeninginthegameatanygiventime.(p.13) BenevolentcompetitionisverymuchwhatIobservedin5N,notstrictlyfromthefemale players,butalsofromthemaleplayers.The5Ncommunitywasabletonegotiateatypeof competitionthatmotivatedplayerstoplaytothebestoftheirabilities,butnottofocussolely onwhethertheywonorlost.Thisisopposedtoamoreindividualistictypeofhigherstakes competitionthatmakeswhowinsandlosesthesolefocusofattention. Patdescribedthekindofcompetitionthatheperceivedtheloungetohave: Idon'tknowifwe'rethatcompetitive.Noonereallyhasthereputationtobetarnished orgotten.It'snotlikethere'sonepersonwho'sthebest,andifyoubeatthatperson you'rethebest.Everyone'sgoodandeveryonehaswinsandlosses...IfI'monmygame andI'mplayingthecharacterIknow,I'mprettygood.I'measilydefeatedthough.We're notcompetitivelikeHaha,Idefeatedyouthat'sgreat!It'smorelike,that'scool,let's playagain. Withthiskindofcompetitioninthe5Nlounge,failurewasnotsomethingtobeashamedof,it wasaninevitablepartofplayingthegame.Itwasnotintertwinedwiththeplayersidentitiesin thegroup.Jenson,deCastell,andFisher(2007)foundthistobeamajordifferencebetweenthe allgirlandallboygroupstheyobservedplayingvideogamesintheirstudy: Incontrasttothegirls,theboysactivelyunderminedoneanother,referredtoeach otherasgoodorpoorgamersandestablishedandmaintainedahierarchyofmoreand lessproficientplayersonanygivengame.Fortheboys,muchmoresothanthegirls, theirgameplaywasconnectedtotheiridentity:theyweregoodorbad,skilledornot skilled,and/orawinnerorloser.Becausetheirveryidentityasagameplayerwasat stakewhentheyplayed,theircommentstooneanother,theirbanter,wasoftenbiting andcruel.(p.14)
What'smoreimportantabouthowthegroupscompetedisnotwhetheritwasboysorgirls 79
participatinginanunderminingtypeofcompetition,butwhetherwinningorlosingdefined howaplayerwasseenbytheotherplayers.Jensonetal.werenottryingtomaptypesof competitiontoonegender,but,instead,theywantedtodrawattentiontotherelationship betweenidentityconstructionandthestakesofwinningagame.Identityisshapedbyhowa playerseeshimorherself,butalsobytheirsocialcontextbyhowotherplayerscometosee them.Ifagroupdecidestheyonlyvaluemembersthatwin,thatviewwillinfluencehowthe playersdefineoneanotherandthemselves.Ifplayersdecidethatwhatmattersishow someoneplaysthegame,thenitwillcreateadifferentkindofrelationshipbetweenthe players. Inthe5Ncommunity,therewasnotastrictlyadheredtohierarchyrelatedtotheirgameplay. Therewasageneralunderstandingofwhowongamesmorethanothers,butthestudentsalso valuedplayerswhotoldthebestjokesormadetheplayfunforothers.Theresultsofaboutin Brawlrarelybecamerelatedtootherboutsortoplayers'understandingofeachotherasvalued membersofthecommunity.Thegamingwouldcontinueonanotherweekendnightandplayers wouldkeeptryingtowiniftheywantedto,butitdidnotdefinetheirroleinthegroup.Players cametobeknownforhowsocialtheywere,howtheycontributedtotheconversationthat goesonaroundthegaming,andhowtheyaddedtotheplayfulmoodofthelounge. Thisemphasisonbeingsocialledtoamorerelaxedapproachtohowpeopleplayedthegame. Inthisenvironment,wherewinningwasnotnecessarilyneededtobeconsideredavalued memberofthegroup,thereweremoreflexiblerolestobeplayedbyparticipants.Some
80
Cardgames ThestudentsinteractionsduringthevideogameBrawlwereverysimilartothoseduringnon digitalgaming.IobservedthestudentsplayingtwocardgamesintheloungeaChinesetrick takinggamecalledTractorandanEnglishversionofanItaliancardgamecalledBang!.These gameswereverydifferentinstructure,butbothhadaspectsthatallowedthestudentsto socializeinaplayfulandperformativeway.AswithBrawl,theywereplayedinalowstakes manner.ThecardgameswerecompetitiveinawaythatwassimilartoBrawl,wherebyplayers trashtalkedduringthegame.Thisbehavior,however,didnotcarryoverintothesociallifeof theloungeafterthegameended.Also,thegameactionsweremotivatedbythegameas experienceandgameassocialeventframes,whichmeantthegroupemphasizedthe processofplayingovertheendresults. Asopposedtodigitalgames,itshouldnotbeasurprisethatcardgamescanbeextremely social.Parlett(1990)hassaidaboutcardgames:
81
[An]attractionofcardgamesisthattheyareplayablebyanyreasonablenumber.For centuriestheyhaveprovedauniquelysociableactivityagainstthealternativesoftwo playergamesrequiringexclusiveconcentration...Playingcards,perhapspartlyfortheir aestheticqualities,havealwaysappealedasmuchtowomenastomen,andtheir sociablenatureisenhancedbythefactthatwholegamesconsistofrelativelybriefpart gameswithopportunitiesfortalkandrelaxationinbetween.(p.25) Theabilityforcardgamestofacilitatesocialinteractioniscalledintoquestionlessoftenthan digitalgames,whichhaveastigmaofbeingisolating.Thereasonfordiscussingcardgamesin thischapteristhattheywerepopularformsofgamingintheloungeandtheyalsoattracted somefemaleplayerswhodidnotplaydigitalgames. In5N,thestudentswhoplayedcardgamesvariedsomewhatfromthosewhoplayedBrawl, andnoteveryonewhoplayedBang!playedTractor.Thegamewiththemostplayeroverlap withBrawlwasthecardgameBang!.TherulesofBang!aresimple,butthedeckisuniqueand madeupofmanydifferentcards.Bang!isbasedonthespaghettiWesternfilmgenremade popularbySergioLeoni.AsonemightguessfromthenameBang!,thebasicpremiseofthe gameistoshoototherplayers.Itisnotacooperativegame,butinsteadsetseachplayer againsttheothers.Thismakesitsplayerstructuresimilartothebrawlmode5Nfavoredin Brawl. InBang!,eachplayerisdealtarolecardSheriff,Renegade,OutlaworDeputy.Theymustalso chooseaspecificcharacterfromthreeothercardstheyaredealt,eachofwhichofferscertain abilitieslikebeingabletodrawextracardsorattackmorethanothers.Eachplayerhasa certainnumberoflifepointsthatcanbetakenawaywhenotherplayersplayaBang!cardon them.Playerstaketurnsdrawingcards,takingactionsusingcardsintheirhand,andthen 82
discardingexcesscards.ThegameendswhenthepersonplayingtheSheriffiskilled.Pointsare distributedaccordingtowhoisthenleftalive.IftheSheriffisleftaliveandalltheOutlawsand theRenegadearekilled,theSheriffandanyliveDeputiesreceivepoints. When5NplaysBang!,itisasocialevent.AfterseveralvisitsIhadheardaboutthegamebut neverseenitplayed.Finally,onenightPatsuggestedweplayit.First,Patexplainedtherulesin detailtome,goingthrougheachcardinthedeck.Ihadheardfromothersthathewas particularlygoodatexplainingrules.ThiswasoneoftheonlytimesIinteractedwithhimthat hewascompletelyserious.Whenthegamebeganthough,sodidthejokes.PatandLisa describedinmoredetailthepurposeofBang!: Pat:...Bang!isjustopportunitiesforjokes. Interviewer:PeoplewhoarelessintocomplexgamesandjokesplayBang?It'smore lighthearted? Pat:Yeah,Bang!isdefinitelymorelighthearted.Eventhoughitsaboutkillingpeople.
Lisa(viaemail):Foronething,Bang!allowsustomakesexjokeswithoutneedinga properexcusehaha.Itsalsodifferentfrommostcardgamesinthewaythatitsmore likeaboardgamethananactualcardgamethatyoucanjustplaywithanydeck.Itsa mixofpeoplewhoplaySmashaswellasotherpeoplewhojusthangoutinthelounge. Itsfunmostlybecausethepeopleplayingareoverthetopandamiableaswell. Bang!isagame,butitalsooffersthestudentsmaterialtoinspirejokesandconversations.In thesamewaythatstudentsmighthavesataroundandtalkaboutaTVshowormovie,the studentssataroundtotalkandjokeaboutwhatwashappeninginthegame.Lisaexplainedthat peopleplayedoverthetopwhichmadethegameplaymoreentertainingforboththe playersandanyonewhohappenedtobearoundinthelounge. AsJakobsson&Akira(2007)foundintheconsolegamingclubinSweden,itisnotjusttherules 83
ofthegamethatmatter,butalsotherulessetbytheculturalandsocialcontext.In5N,they addedsomeoftheirownrulestothegametomakeitmorefun.Forinstance,thereisacard calledCanCanthatallowsaplayertotakeonecardfromeveryplayer.Thestudentsin5N addedtheirownrulethatwhenanyoneplayedthiscard,everyonehadtogetupanddoan actualcancanlinedance.WhenweplayedIhadtoleavebeforethegamewasoverandthe playersdecidedtodothecancananywayjustsoIcouldseeit.Abouttenofus,bothpeople playingandnotplayinginthelounge,linedupalongthehallandquicklycoordinateda30 secondcancanline,whichinturnledtomuchlaughter. Bang!isnotasimplegame;ithasmanydifferentactionsandmultiplestrategiesyoucantake duringplay.Thestudentsin5Nhaveplayeditenoughtimesthattheyknowmostoftheactions withouthavingtoreadtheexplanationsonthecards,allowingthemtomakejokesduringthe gameabouttheplayoranythingelsethatcomesupduringthegame.Alotofthetalkwas aboutthingsthathadhappenedpreviouslytosomeoneinthegrouporinteractionswithpeople whowalkedby.Atonepoint,acoupleofthestudentsbrokeintoafunnysong.Whilewe played,theopeningceremonyoftheWinterOlympicswasontheTV,whichaddedmaterialfor commentaryandjokesduringthegame. Bang!wasthegamethatalmosteveryoneintheloungeplayed.Itwasplayedlessoftenthan Brawl,butitappealedtoawideraudience.Bang!didnotrequireanypreviousexperienceor handeyecoordinationlikemostdigitalgamesdo,butitdidrequiremoreofatime commitmentthanBrawlbecauseofitslongerformat.Theopportunitiesforjokesand conversationwereconstantthroughoutthegamebecauseplayerscouldtalkwithotherplayers 84
orotherpeopleintheloungewhilethepersonwhoseturnitwasdecidedontheirnextmove. Whilesomeofthestudentssaidtomethatthegameissimple,itinvolvesauniquedeckthat mustbelearnedandcertainlyrequiresstrategytostayinthegameandwin.Therewasno singularreasonwhythisgameappealedtothewidestgroupofplayers,butitfacilitatedplayful socialinteractionbyactingasthecatalystforjokes,offeringmomentsbetweenturnswhere studentcouldsocializewithotherplayersandothersinthelounge,andrequiringno technologicalskill. Themorecomplicatedcardgame,Tractor,wasplayedbyaslightlydifferentgroupofpeoplein thelounge,butalsofitwiththesocialgoalsofthegroup.IobservedtwogamesofTractor happeningatonceonenightinthelounge.Thegenderratioofonegamewassplitalmost evenlybetweenmaleandfemaleplayers,buttheothergamehadonlyonewomanplayer. Whatwasstriking,though,wasthatalmostalloftheplayerswereAsianAmerican.Itwasnot obviouswhythiswastomeuntillaterwhenIwastoldthatTractorisaChinesecardgame.Pat explained,inanemail,howthegamecameto5Nonesummerwhenonlysomeofthestudents werearoundandwhyitmaybemorepopularwithAsianAmericanstudents: Pat:Ithink[anAsianAmericanmalestudent]wastheonewhobroughtitto[the dorm].LotsofChineseparentsplaycardgameslikeTractor,andhehappenedtolearn fromhisparentsandpasseditontous.Forme,it'sfunandenjoyabletoplaybecauseit remindsmeofplayingcardgameswithmyparents;ithaskindofanostalgicfeeltoit, withtonsofinsidejokesandlaughsmixedin...ThemannerinwhichChinesepeoplesee Tractorandrelatedgames(Mahjong,DouDizhu,etc.)isthattheyexpectfamilyand closefamilyfriendstositaroundatable,eatingsunflowerseedsanddrinkingtea(or beer,sometimes)andhaveafewlaughsandtalkaboutanything.TheChinesekidscame intothisgamesettingwiththatkindoffeeling,andit'sbeenprettysimilar;we'reall reallycloseandthegameisawayforustoexpressourcloseness.Evenforthenon ChinesemembersofourTractorgroup,Ibelievethattheyfeelthesameway. 85
Patexplainedthatthereisadeepculturalandfamilialconnectiontothiskindofsocialcard gameformanyofthestudentsintheloungewhoareChineseAmerican.Theyhavegrownup understandingthatplayingthegameisareasontointeractwithfriendsandfamily.Itshouldbe notedthatthegamestartedintheloungewhenthosewhomighthavebeenexcludedwere awayforthesummer.WhilePatwaswillingtoexplainthegametothem,theymighthavefelt thatitwasit'snotworthtryingtocatchuptotheskillleveloftheotherplayerssinceitwasa morecomplicatedandstrategicgamethanBrawlorBang!. Bang!wascomplicatedformethefirsttimeItriedtoplayitbecauseIwasunfamiliarwithall thepossibleactions,anditwouldhavetakentimetobecomefamiliarwiththecontent.Tractor iscomplicatedinadifferentway.Itisplayedwithtraditionalplayingcards,buttherulesare longandcomplex.16SomestudentswhoplayedBrawlandBang!saidthattheydidn'tplay Tractorbecauseitwastoocomplicated. Lisa:IdontplaytrickcardgamesbecauseImafanofsimplicityovercomplexityinmy games.Ifittakesmetoolongtolearnandgetgoodatitsnotfun,andgamesshouldbe fun. Itcouldbethatthesestudentswerelessfamiliarwiththiskindofgame.JasonisAsian Americanandhepreferreddigitalgamesinvolvingstrategytotricktakingcardgamesthatwere toocomplex.LisaisAfricanAmericanandgrewupplayingcardswithherdad,butthekindof
16
86
complexityinvolvedinBang!andTractordidnotappealtoher.Whatwasmoreimportantwas thatTractorwasnottheonlygamingoptionavailablein5NandbothJasonandLisawereable tofindothergamestoparticipatein. Evenifsomeonedidn'tlikeplayingTractororBang!in5N,theycouldstillbeinvolvedinthe activitybecause,liketheothergamesplayedin5N,itwasaperformativeandsocialactivity. ThefirsttimeIencounteredTractorIendedupwatchingandtalkingtothepeopleplayingfor about30minuteswithLisa.Myfieldnotesfromthatnightcapturedthescene: WhenwearrivedupstairsthescenewasquitedifferentfromwhatIhadseentwoweeks before.Thistimenoonewasplayingvideogames.Itwasaround9:30pmandthe majorityoftheactionwashappeningonthesideoftheloungethatwasfarthestfrom theTV.Twogroups,oneseatedataroundtableandtheotheraroundacoffeetable, wereplayingveryvocal,fastpacedcardgames.ThestudentsweremostlyAsian Americanwithathreegirl/threeboysplitattheroundtableandaonegirl/fiveboysplit atthecoffeetable.ThemostvocalplayerswereMei,whoseemedtoberunningthe gameathertable,JessicaandPat,whowereplayingathertable,and[afemalestudent Ihadn'tinterviewed],whowastheonlygirlattheothertable.Therewasoneguyatthe coffeetablethatwouldshoutouttotheothertableeveryonceinawhile. LisaandIstoodbytheroundtableandtriedtofigureoutwhattheywereplaying....Mei wassaidtobeonstageatonepoint,whichIdon'tthinkwasatechnicaltermfromthe game,butshedidseemtobeleadingtheactionsofthegameinsomewayandwas aggressivelyvocalinawaythatreinforcedherposition.Herwordsweren'tusually directedatanyperson,butmoresowereusedtomentionhowwellshewasdoing... Whilethecardgamewasintense,therewasafairamountofconversationandactivity goingonthatseemedunrelated.SeveraltimeswhileLisaandIstoodthereforabout30 minutes,someonebrokeoutinsong.SomeofthesongsIdidn'tknow,buttheywere mainlyfunnysongsfrommusicals.Atonepoint,Patraisedhishandandyelled,Fiddler ontheRoof!Yeah!andhighfivedaguybehindhim.Hethensangpartofasongfrom Fiddler,inwhatmostpeoplewouldprobablyconsideragoodsingingvoice,withafair amountofsincerity....Therewereatanygiventime35peoplestandingoverthegames ormillingaroundthelounge.Thesepeoplewouldtrytofollowtheplayorconversewith theplayerswhentheycould.Becausethegamesweresolively,evenifyoudidn'tknow everythingwasgoingon,youcouldstillwatchthedynamicsofthegameandlistento thewittybanterandbeentertained... 87
Atthispointinmyresearch,Ihadn'theardmuchaboutpeopleplayingcardsinthelounge.I wassurprisedthatnoonewasplayingvideogames,butrecognizedthatthewaythestudents playedcardswasverysimilartohowtheyplayedBrawlevenifsomeoftheplayerswere different.SomeofthemostvocalplayerswerealsothemostvocalplayersofBrawlMei,Pat, andJessica.Thoughthefemalestudentswerefewerthanmalestudents,allofthewomen playingwereveryvocaland,asIsayinmynotes,Meiwasobviouslydominatinghergame.She wastrashtalkingsimilarlytohowsheandotherplayersdidinBrawl.Shewasn'tdisparaging otherplayers,butwasmakingexaggeratedstatementsabouthowgoodshewasatthegame, playingupherroleasthebestplayer. Theperformanceoftheplayers,whetheritwasprovokedbythegameornot,createda spectaclefornonplayerstowatchorinteractwiththroughoutthegameplay.Sometimes peoplecametotheloungetoseewhatwasgoingon,butsometimestheywerejustpassingby inthehallwayontheirwayadormroom.Theycouldbeentertainedbylisteningtowitty banter,joininwhenplayersbrokeintosong,ortrytofigureoutwhatwashappeningwiththe game.Thegameprovidedastructureforinteractionintheloungethatnotonlyincludedthe playersofthegame,butalsothosewatchingthegame. Thisinteractionwasnotstrictlyregulatedtomattersofthegame,itwasintertwinedwith socializingaboutsharedinterests.Thegameplayerswerethecenterofattention,butwerenot relegatedtoaimpenetrablemagiccircle,aconceptdevelopedandemployedbygamescholars toexplainaboundedoffspace,inwhichagameoccursthatkeepsitseparatefromandsubject 88
todifferentrulesthanordinarylife(Huizinga,1955;Salen&Zimmerman,2004).Consalvo (2009)hasarguedthatthisconceptofamagiccircleupholdsstructuralistdefinitionsor conceptualizationsofgames.Itemphasizesformatthecostoffunction,withoutattentionto thecontextofactualgameplay(p.411). Inthe5Nlounge,therewasalmostconstantinteractionbetweenthegameplayersandtheir socialcontext.Therewasnosensethatthepeopleplayingthegamewerenotinvolvedwiththe otheractivitiesgoingoninthelounge.Instead,theywerejustasintegratedintothesocializing assomeonewhowascooking,doinghomework,orsurfingtheweb.Consalvohassuggested, Whatif,ratherthanrelyingonstructuralistdefinitionsofwhatisagame,weviewagameasa contextual,dynamicactivity,whichplayersmustengagewithformeaningtobemade. Furthermore,itisonlythroughthatengagementthatthegameismadetomean(p.411).This ishowIcametounderstandtheroleofgamesinthelounge.Theyweremorethanjustrules, playingcards,oraWiidisc.Theywerepartofalargernetworkofactivitiesandsocial interactions,sometimesoccurringevenbeyondthelounge,thatinfluencedoneanotherand thatstudentsmovedfluidlybetween.
89
game,buttookplaceoutsideoftheformalgamestructure.Itbecameanintegralpartofthe playprocess. GoingbacktoJuul's(2010)considerationsforgameactionmotivationswecanbetter understandhowthesocialgoalsof5Ninteractedwiththegamestructure.Theorientation towardsagoalwasnotcompletelygone,astheplayerswerestilltryingtobeatoneanother, butoutofthethreeconsiderations,winningwastheleastemphasizedbythegroup.Asthe gamebecamemoreintegratedintothenetworkofotheractivitiesandsocializingofthelounge, players'motivationsshiftedawayfromthegameasgoalorientationandmoretowards gameasexperienceandgameassocialevent. Thisisalsonottosaythattheweightoftheconsiderationsdidn'tvaryattheindividuallevel. MeimighthavevaluedwinningaBrawlboutin5NmorethanIwouldhaveasaresearcher becauseIwastryingtosecuremyrelationshipswiththeplayersin5N.Inthisscenario,Mei wouldbemorefocusedonthegameasgoalorientationwinningthegameandIwould havebeenmoreconcernedwiththegameassocialevent.Thesedifferingmotivationswould resultintwoverydifferentplayingstylesduringthesamegame.Ingeneralthereweremultiple motivationsatworkatanygiventime.Therewasanoverallsharedunderstandingofthesocial goalsofthegroup,whichallplayerstookintoconsiderationwhileplaying.Therewerealso individualmotivationsatwork,thatwhencombinedwiththesocialgoalsofthegroupcreateda rangeofactionsthatkepttheplayacceptableandappealingtoallinvolved.
90
Thequestionremainsofwhychoosegamesasawayofsociallyinteracting?Flanagan(2009) hasproposedthatgamescanalsobeseenassocialtechnologiesthatfunctionasanordering logic...forcreatingsocialrelations,[they]worktodistillorabstracttheeverydayactionsofthe playersintoeasytounderstandinstrumentswherecontextisdefamiliarizedjustenoughto allowHuizinga'smagiccircleofplaytomanifest(p.9).Ihavequestionedtheexistenceofan impenetrablemagiccircleabove,butwhatFlanaganpointsoutisthatgamesareawayof facilitatingsocialinteractionthatordersandabstractseverydayactivitiesandinteractions. Studentsgatheredintheloungeduringtheeveningandonweekendstohaveanexperience thatwasdifferentfromdoingclassworkortakingcareofotherresponsibilities.Inthelounge, gamingwasengagingandsocial,butlowstakesandinclusive. ManyMITstudentsarehighachieversandhardworkers,andgamesareawaytocontinue feelingthissenseofproductivity,butwithoutthepressureofbeinggraded.Rachelexplained: Iguessit'stheMITculturethatweliketobeconstantlybusy.Whenyouwatchamovie you'renotaccomplishinganything.Thisismymindset,Idon'tknowifitfitsinwithother people.IfeellikeifI'mnotactivelydoingsomethingoraccomplishingsomething,thenI feellikeitsawasteofmytime...IfeelliketakingbreakswhereIdon'tdoanything,for meisveryirritating,causethenIfeellikeI'mactuallywastingtime.Ifeelguiltyaboutit. LikewhenI'mtakingabreakandIcansayIgainedfivelevelsonthisgame,Icanfeellike Iaccomplishedsomething...afteralongdaysworkandyouwanttocomehomeandtake yourangeroutonsomething,thenlikeSmashorsomethingistheperfectgametoplay.
91
ofaccomplishmentorvalue.
Conclusion The5Ncommunitychosecertaindigitalandnondigitalgamesthatcouldfacilitateplayful socializing.Theirchoiceofgamesisimportant,butsoisthewaythattheyplayedthemandfit themintothesocialcontextofthelounge.Thepresenceofdifferentgamesoffereddifferent modesofentrytogamingforagroupofstudentswithdifferentexperiencelevelsand preferences.Somestudentsweredrawntoagamebecauseofpreviousexperienceor nostalgia,aswasthecasewithLisaandBrawlorPatandTractor.Janellehadnoexperience withdigitalgamesandexpressednointerestinplayingthem,butshewasabletoparticipatein theconversationaroundBrawlandfoundpleasureinplayingthecardgameBang!. Also,thegamesplayedwereflexibleenoughinstructurethattheycouldbealignedwiththe socialgoalsofthecommunity.Manyofthegames'structuralelementsloweredbarriersto participationandhelpedtomaintainaninclusivegamingenvironment.InBrawl,therewere modesthatoffereddifferentplayingexperiences,alargepoolofcharacterstochoosefrom, simplecontrols,andoptionalitemsthatcouldenhanceplayerattacks.Bang!andTractorhad fixedformalrules,butofferedanopenenoughstructurethatstudentscouldsocializebetween turnsoraddtheirownrules.Theformalgoalsofeachgamewereveryclear,butdidn'tcarry overintoothergameplaysessionsinawaythatwouldcreateahierarchyordenyaccessto playerswholost.
92
Finally,thestudentsintheloungechosegamesthatcouldbeplayedinalowstakes, perfomativemanner.Thewittybanterandtrashtalkprovokedbythegameactionssocially engagedplayerswitheachother,butalsowithpeopleintheloungenotplayingthegame.This allowednonplayerstohaveareasontoparticipateinthegamingexperience,withoutthe pressureofwinningorlosing.Observerslikemecouldbecomefamiliarwithhowgamesworked byengagingattheperipheryandeventuallybecomeinterestedinplaying.Thiskindof exposuretothedifferentgamesinthelounge,inadditiontomentoringfrommoreexperienced players,ledtostudentswhodidn'tplaypreviouslybecomingplayers.Thestudentswho currentlyplayencouragednonplayerstojoininfortheexperience,butalsotomakefuture gameplaymorediverseandinteresting. Gamestructurecanbemoreorlessflexibleandconducivetodiversegroupsofplayers,butitis notinagamesstructurealonethatinclusivegamingiscreated.AsConsalvo(2009)said:We cannotunderstandgameplaybylimitingourselvestoonlyseeingactionsandnotinvestigating reasons,contexts,justifications,limitations,andthelike.Thatiswherethegameoccursand wherewemustfinditsmeaning(p.415).Inthenextchapter,Iwillfurtherexplorethecontext ofgaminginthe5Nloungebyexaminingtheindividualexperiences,playingstylesand motivationsofthestudentswhomadeupthecommunity.
93
CHAPTERTHREE:ThePlayers
Themembersofthe5Ncommunityplayeddigitalandnondigitalgamestogetherinthelounge, buttheyalsoplayedgamesoutsideofthelounge,withothergroupsofpeople,andontheir own.Iobservedthestudentsplayinggamesintheirroomsandontheirlaptopsthatwerenot thesamegamestheyplayedtogetherinthelounge.Thestudentshadarangeofpreferencesin thegamestheyplayedanddifferentstylesofplayingthem.Ifoundthatthefemaleplayers sharedsimilaritiesinthewaytheywereintroducedtoplayingdigitalgames,butfromthat momentontheirtrajectoriesusuallyvaried.Myobservationsandinterviewswiththe5N communityshowthatgamingpreferencesandstylesaretoosituatedandcomplextobe mappedtogenderalone. Theplayersin5Nalsohaddifferentwaysofidentifyingwithgamingculture.Onlyoneofthe femaleplayersconsideredherselfagamer.Theotherwomennegotiatedusingtheterm gamertoidentifythemselvesbyaddingmodifiers,suchascasualorsoftcore,orthey rejectedthelabel.Thewomen'sunderstandingsofgamerweresituatedintheirsocialcontext andrelatedtotheirownexperiencelevel,aswellastheexperiencelevelsofthosearound them.Inthischapter,Ishowthatwomenplayersenjoyplayingamuchwiderrangeofgames 94
thandigitalgirlgames,andthattheycontinuouslynegotiatehowtheypositionthemselvesin digitalgamingcultureaccordingtotheprevailinggamerstereotypes.
Beginningtogame ArecentPewstudy(2008)suggestedthathighschoolagedgirlsaretheleast'enthusiastic' aboutplayingvideogamesoutofU.S.teens.Becauseoftherelativelylowlevelofparticipation amongfemaleteens,Iwasparticularlyinterestedininterviewingwomenformyresearchwho hadcontinuedplayingdigitalgamesthroughhighschool.Investigatingthereasonswhymany youngwomenloseinterestindigitalgamesisbeyondthescopeofthispaper,butIdidattempt tounderstandhowthestudentsofthe5Ncommunitybecameinterestedindigitalgames,how theyhadsustainedtheirinterestingamingthroughhighschool,andwhytheycontinued gamingincollege. IaskedeachofthestudentsIinterviewed,maleandfemale,totellmetheirgaminghistories. Mostofthestudentstoldmeaboutthedigitalgamestheyplayedinelementaryschool,middle school,andhighschool.Twoofthestudentshadshorterhistories:Jessica,whostartedplaying gamesinhighschool,andJanelle,whohadneverplayeddigitalgames. Onesignificantpatternthatemergedfromthehistoriesofthefemalestudentswhobeganto gamebeforehighschool,wasthattheytypicallyplayedwithmaleplayerswhiletheywere growingup.Inthe1980sand1990sboysweremorelikelytobeplayingdigitalgames,and gamingwasusuallygenderedmale,assomethingboysdo.Klineetal(2003)explainthatthe
95
gameindustryatthistimelaunchedpowerfulandcalculatedlygenderbasedappealsthat combinedwiththepowerfulpreexistingdivisionsthatalreadysegregatesomanyformsof entertainment...andwiththeoverallmalepredominanceinhightechactivities,(atleastuntil veryrecently)relentlesslyconstructedthegameplayingsubjectasmale(p.257). Thewomenin5Nwerediscouragedfromplayingdigitalgamestovaryingdegreesdepending ontheirsocialcontexts.Someoftheirparentsweremorewillingthanotherstosupporttheir daughters'gaminginterestsandprovideaccesstogamingplatforms.Mostofthewomenwere abletofindgroupsoffriendsthatacceptedtheirinterestingaming,buttheywereusually majoritymale.Almostallofthewomenwereintroducedtogamingbyamalefamilymemberor friend: Interviewer:Whendidyoufirststartplaying? Lisa:Ithinkmaybearoundfourorfive[yearsold].MydadhadtheSuperNintendo withtheMariogamesandPinkPanther.Weplayedthatlikeeverynight... Interviewer:Butitwasmostlyyourdadthatintroducedyoutogaming? Lisa:Yeahmymomhatedhimforitthough. Jessica:...inHawaiiwithmycousins,Iplayedwiththem.TheyplayedHalo17alot. Interviewer:Weretheyolder? Jessica:Oneofthemisolderthanmebylikethreeyears.Hisyoungerbrothersayear youngerthanme.Theotheryoungerbrotherislikefifteennow. Interviewer:SotheywouldplayHalo?Didyoueverplaywiththem? Jessica:Sometimes,theyletmeplay.Icouldprobablybeattwoofthethree... ThispatternofmalesintroducingfemalestogamingalsoextendedtomanyofthewomenI interviewedatMIToutsideof5N.Theycitedfathers,cousins,unclesandmalefriendsasthe firstpeoplewhoshowedthemdigitalgames.Someofthefemaleplayersrecalledtheirmothers
17
HaloisaseriesoffirstpersonshootergamesforXboxandPCthatcanbeplaysingleormultiplayer.Itisa populargameontheprofessionalgamingcircuit.
96
playingdigitalgamestogetherwiththeirfamilies,butnoneoftheintervieweeshadafemale playertomentorthemwhiletheywereyoung. Onemajorfactorinhowwomenbegintoplaydigitalgamesiswhetherornottheyhaveaccess toagamingconsole.SchottandHorrell(2000)foundintheirstudyongirlsandwomenwho playdigitalgamesthatevenowningaconsoledoesnotalwayssecureordeterminegirl gamers'relationshipwiththeirconsole,andthatifmalesalsohadaccesstotheconsole,the femaleplayershadtocompeteforaccess(p.41).[T]hissituationwasbaseduponacommon perception,evidentinallthediscussions,thatmalesare'theexperts'whenitcomestoknowing whatisrequiredandhowitisachieved.Inallcases,malesconstitutedavitalframeof referenceforgirlgamers'gamingpractices(p.41).Whileitisobviouslypossibleforgirlsand womentoplayonconsoles,thereareperceptions,asSchottandHorrellmention,thatframe playingdigitalgamesassomethinggirlsshouldnotdoandthesebeliefsobstructfemaleaccess toparticipation. Theperceptionofmaleplayers'defaultexpertise,asshownbyKlineetal.,mightberootedin similarstereotypesincomputing,whichMargolisandFisher(2002)havealsofoundintheir workinthefieldofcomputerscience: Veryearlyinlife,computingisclaimedasmaleterritory.Ateachstepfromearly childhoodthroughcollege,computingisbothactivelyclaimedasguystuffbyboysand menandpassivelycededbygirlsandwomen.Theclaimingislargelytheworkofa cultureandsocietythatlinksinterestandsuccesswithcomputerstoboysandmen.(p. 4) Itisnotacoincidencethatthemasculinegenderingofcomputingcarriedoverintodigital
97
gaminginthe1980sand1990s.Consoleswerenotgenerallyframedasgamingplatformsmade forwomenuntiltherecentintroductionofthemorefemininecodedWii,whichhasabright andsleekdesign,gamesgearedtowardsfamilythemedplay,andmovementbasedcontrols.As computerusageanddigitalgamingbecomemoreubiquitousanddiverse,theymaybecome lessgenderedasmasculine,butthewomenof5Ngrewupatatimewhenbeingagirlplaying digitalgameswasnotthenorm.AsIexplainedinChapterOne,thewomenofthe5N communitysometimeactasmentorstootherfemaleplayers.Itremainstobeseeniffemale playersaremorelikelytointroducedigitalgamestothenextgenerationofplayers. Whilethenumberofwomenwhoplaydigitalgamesoverall,especiallyhandheldandonline games,appearstobeapproachinginsomecasesexceedingthenumberofmenwhoplay,it isstillthecasethatgirlsarelesslikelytohaveaccesstoagamingconsole(Entertainment SoftwareAssociation,2009;Pew,2008).ThewomenIinterviewedhadamixofexperiences withowningaconsole.Somehadtocompetefortimeplayingwithsiblingsorotherfamily members;othershadfullaccess;andothershadtonegotiatewiththeirparentsaround gaming: Rachel:...IvisitedrelativesinSeattle,andtheyhadaSegaGenesis.Itwasamazingto mebecauseIhadneverplayedvideogames...Ihadplayedpinballonfather'scomputer, butthatdoesn'treallycount.Mycousinswerelike,Hereplaythisgame,itsreally cool....Idon'tevenknowwhatI'mdoing,Ijustbuttonmashed...ItwasSonicthe Hedgehog...afterthatIwaslikeDadIreallywantaSegaGenesis...Andhegotmeone formyfifthbirthday.Iplayedreligiouslylikeonceaweek...Itbecameafamilyaffair...My fatherwouldplay,mymomwouldattempttoplay.Itwasafamilybondingexperience. Youcouldnotsavegamesthensowe'dspendsevenhourstryingtowin. Mei:Yeah,IhadaGameBoy,andIhadPokemonRed...Myfriend,hehadPokemon Blueandwejusttraded...andthenmymomgaveawaymyGameBoy.Shesaid,You playtoomuchonitandshegaveitaway.AndthenIdidn'thaveanyportableconsoles 98
afterthat....IgotaWiiforfree.Iwashappy.Itwasacongratulationsongettinginto MITgift...Myparentswerelike,Wewanttosellthis.Iwaslike,Youcan'tsellother people'sgifts.Therewerelike,Fine,butwe'renotbuyingyougames...Iendedup convincingthemtobuymetwogames. Thesepassagesshowadiscrepancyinaccess.Rachelsaidshewasabletoconvinceherparents atayoungagetogetagamingsystem.Shethenhadaccesstoaconsole,butitwassharedby thefamilyandplayedmorebyherfatherthanhermother.Meihadaportabledevicetoplay gameson,butonceherparentsdecidedshewasusingittoomuch,theytookitaway.Theyalso triedtogetridofherWii,showinglittleappreciationfortheimportanceofgamingfortheir daughter.Inbothcases,parentsplayedsignificantrolesingrantingandmaintainingaccessto gamingconsolesforgirls.PopCap.com(2010),apopularcasualgamingsite,foundinasurvey thatparentsandgrandparentsare55percentmorelikelytodiscouragetheplayingof hardcoregames[violentfirstpersonshootersandhorrorthemedgames]bygirlsaged14 yearsoldandunder,comparedtoboysofthesameage.Parents'opinionsabouttheir daughterswhoplaygamesonconsolesarestillcloselytiedtobroaderexistingperceptionsof whatgirlsshouldandshouldnotdo.Becausehardcoregames,areoftenassociatedwith consolegaming,thiscouldleadparentstodiscouragegirlsfromowningorplayingwith consoles. ForMei,itwasnotafamilymemberwhointroducedhertogames;itwashermalefriends.She wasarecentimmigranttoMontanafromChina,andshewasveryawareofbeingoneofthe fewnonwhitepeopleinthearea.Hermalefriendsexposedhertogamingatayoungage: Mei:WhenIfirstcametoAmerica,IwenttoMontana.TherearelikenoAsiansthere. Whatever.Therewasnothingexceptforwhitepeoplethere...ItraveledalotbecauseI wasonswimteam,butneversawonenonwhiteperson.WellIstartedplayingwhenI 99
wasabouteight,Ithink.Mybestfriendswereallguysandtheyplayedvideogames.I meanIhadfriendswhoweregirlsbuttheyweren'tthatgirlyeither.Like,theonly friendsIhadthatweregirlswerethepeopleonmybasketballteam.AndIjustplayed lotsofgames. Meiexpressedselfreflexiveinsightsaboutherracialandgenderawarenessinthisquote.She movedtoaplacewhereshefeltoutofplacebecauseeveryoneelsewaswhite.Sheimplied thatthisfeelingofdifferenceoutweighedanyconcernabouthangingoutwithpeersofthe oppositegender.Meididn'texplicitlyexplainwhy,buthermaingroupoffriendswasprimarily male,andtheyfocusedongaming.Herfriendshipswithgirlsweredevelopedthroughaformof nondigitalgamingbasketball. ThefactthatMeiandtheotherwomenof5Nplayedwithgroupsofboyswhentheywere growingupisnottypicalamongelementaryandmiddleschoolagedchildren.Atthatstageof development,boysandgirlsdobefriendeachother,butithasbeenshownthatitismore commonforchildrentobepartofsamegenderfriendgroups.Thorne(1993)foundthisina studyofelementaryandmiddleschoolstudentsatplayinschoolsettings:[A]lthoughgirlsand boysaretogetherandofteninteractinclassrooms,lunchrooms,andontheplayground,these contactslessoftendeepenintofriendshipsorstablealliances,whilesamegenderinteractions aremorelikelytosolidifyintomorelastingoracknowledgedbonds(p.47). Thorne(1993)hasofferedaconceptualframeworkforthinkingaboutchildren'scrossgender interactions.First,sheexplainedborderwork,whichoccurswhenboysandgirlsinteractinways thatstrengthentheirborders...andevokerecurringthemesthataredeeplyrootedinour culturalconceptionsofgender,andtheysuppressawarenessofpatternsthatcontradictand 100
qualifythem(pp.64,66).Shecitedanexampleofatimewhenboysdisruptgirlswhoare playingjumpropeandtrytochangethetermsoftheactivitytotheirownbyswingingtherope toohardorinadifferentway. Thornethendiscussescrossing,alesscommonactionthatoccurswhenagirlorboymayseek accesstogroupsandactivitiesoftheothergender...withtheintentoffullparticipationinthe activitiesandonthetermsofthegroups...(p.121).Crossingisakintowhatthewomenin5N weredoingwhentheyplayedgameswiththeirmalefriends.Theyhadanearnestinterestin playingthegamesandwerewillingtoparticipatealongwiththetermsofthegroup.Inhigh school,thewomenof5Ncontinuedcrossingastheyplayeddigitalgameswithmajoritymale groupsoffriends.Lisa,forexample,broughtherGameCubetoschoolonedayandhelped createanongoinggroupactivitytosharewithhermalefriends.Theyfoundemptyclassrooms duringfreetimeandplayedSmashBros.: Interviewer:Sothatwasasocialeventoritwasfocusedonwatchingthegame? Lisa:Justsocial,awaytospendourfreeperiod.Itstartedoutbecausebeforejunior andsenioryearswedidn'thaveanycarsandwecouldn'tdoanythingwithourfree periods.SoI'dbringgamestoschool.... Interviewer:Wasitagoodmixofboysandgirls? Lisa:Iwastheonlygirlintheroom. Interviewer:Really?Didthatbotheryou? Lisa:Itwasn'tthatdifferent'causeIhadgrownuparoundguys'causemydadbrought meupasthelittleboyheneverhad.(Laughs)SoIwasalwaysplayingbasketballor footballwithhimwhenIwasn'tplaying[digital]gameswithhim.Imostlyalwaysgrew updoingguythings.IhatedBarbiesanddresses.Justplayingwithguyswasn'tthat strangeforme. Lisarecalledherexperiencesplayingwithherfathertonormalizeherexperienceplayingdigital gameswithagroupofmalestudents.MosthighschoolgirlsmightfindthesituationLisa describestobeawkward,butnegotiatingthissocialterraincameeasytoLisa,becauseshewas 101
abletotranslatethewaysheplayedwithherfathertohowsheplayedwithhermalefriends. LisatookpartinwhatThorne(1993)describesasacomplicatedcontinuumofcrossing(p.112). Thorneoffersthiscontinuumasanalternativetousingbinarydescriptorssuchassissyand tomboy.Lisacrossedintoamasculinizedcontextofvideogamingwithanearnestinterest andtheabilitytosustainparticipation.Thornenotesthatsuccessfulcrossersarethosewho persevereinspiteoftheriskofbeinglabeledorteased(p.130).AnimportantpartofLisa's abilitytocrossintothisallmalegroupwasthatshecontrolledaccesstothegamingbecause theconsoletheyplayedonwashers. Rachelalsoplayedwithagroupofmalestudentsinhighschool.Theywerenotheronlygroup offriends(shehadamoregenderbalancedgroupoffriendsfromhersciencelab),butshe enjoyedhertimewiththeboys.Whilenotingthattheactivitiessheengagedinwithhermale friendsweredifferentfromtheonessheparticipatedinwithherfemalefriends,shefound bothsituationsappealing: Rachel:Forhighschool,ifIplayedwithotherpeopleitwaseitherRPGsorfirstperson shooters. Interviewer:Youplayedthematschool? Rachel:Playedthemmostlyinschool.Wedidn'tplaythemmuchoutsideofschool, mostlybecauseIwasbusy.Ididscienceresearchandstuff.I'vebeentooneortwoLAN partieswithmyguyfriends.Thatwasanexperience. Interviewer:Why?Didyouenjoythem? Rachel:Itwasreallyenjoyable.It'sjustI'veneverbeeninasettingwhereit'sjust purelyguysandmaybelikeoneothergirl.WhenIgotootherpeople'shousesitslikea girlparty,domakeupandgossip,kindofstuff.Sobeingwithabunchofguysseatedin theirlivingrooms,seatedwiththelightsoff,itwasjustkindoflikeawhatever environment.Nobodycaredwhateachotherlookedlike,itsjustintenselyclicking. Interviewer:Didyoufeellikeyouhadtoactdifferent?Howdidyoudealwiththat? Rachel:IfeellikeinhighschoolIwasmostcomfortablehangingaroundguys.Ifeltlike Icouldbemyselfaroundthem,mainlybecauseIwasreallyopinionatedandIwasreally 102
crude.Sowithmyguyfriends,Iwasnotsomuchallowed,butitwasjustnatural.And theyreallydidn'tcare.LikeIcouldsaysomethinginsultingasajokeandtheywouldn't getoffendedoverit.Whereas,ifIdidthatwithmygirlfriends,thereisprobablya chancethattheywouldgetoffendedoverthat.ItslikeIhadtocensormyselfaround them. Interviewer:Youdidn'thavetototallybeadude?Wereyouabletonegotiatethose things? Rachel:Yeahkindof.Theykindofacceptedmeasthetokengirlinthebunch. Rachelidentifiedheremorewiththebehaviorofhermalefriendsthanherfemalefriends.She exhibitedtheabilitytonegotiatetwoverydifferentsocialgroupsandfindpleasureinboth.Her descriptionsofthetwogroupsweregendered,renderingherfemalefriendsasconcernedwith makeupandgossipandhermalefriendsasunconcernedwiththeirappearanceandfocused moreongamesthancommunication. Walkerdine(2006)hasrecognizedthecomplexnegotiationsthatmusttakeplaceforgirlswho playgamesthathavemasculinizedcontentorcontexts: [M]anygamesarethesitefortheproductionofcontemporarymasculinitybecausethey bothdemandandappeartoensureperformancessuchasheroism,killing,winning, competition,action,combinedwithtechnologicalskillandrationality...Mycentralclaim isthatinrelationtogirls,thisconstitutesaproblembecausecontemporaryfemininity demandspracticesandperformanceswhichbringtogetherheroics,rationality,etc.with theneedtomaintainafemininitywhichdisplayscare,cooperation,concern,and sensitivitytoothers.Thismeansthatgirlshavecomplexsetsofpositionstonegotiate whileplaying...(p.520)
AstudybyRoyseetal.(2007)foundthatwomen'snotionsoftheirgenderedselfaretiedto theirlevelofparticipationingameplay(p.573).Forthewomeninterviewedwhoplayeddigital gamesoverthreehoursperweek,theyfoundthatgamesandgendermutuallyconstituteeach other,meaningthesewomenhadfewerboundariesbetweentheirgameplayandreallife thanwomenwhodonotplaygameswiththesamefrequency(p.573).Thoughsomewomen mayundergoacomplexperformanceofgenderwhileplayingdigitalgames,manyareabledo sowithoutjeopardizingtheirabilitytobefeminine.Theirsituatedpleasuresofbeing competitiveorkillingotherplayersinagamedonot,tothematleast,threatentheirabilityto findpleasureinmorefeminizedactivitieslikesocializingorgroomingofappearance. Thewayacommunityregulatesgenderrolesisimportantbecauseitcanmakeparticipatingin masculinegenderedactivitiesmoreorlesspossibleforwomen.Whilemostofthefemale playersinthe5Ncommunitydidnotseeaproblemwiththeirparticipationindifferently genderedactivities,itispossiblethattheyhaveencounteredsocialcontextswhereitwas problematicforothers.RachelandLisawereabletoparticipateingroupsthatengagedin traditionallyfemininepracticesandgroupsthatengagedintraditionallymasculinepractices. Whathelpedthemdevelopthisabilitytonegotiatebothsituationsistoocomplextodrawsolid conclusionsaboutinthisthesis,butitlikelystemsfromacombinationofthesocialcontextof eachgrouptheyplayedwithandtheirindividualexperienceswithgaming.Itisnotable, however,thatthenegotiationbetweengenderrolesisanabilitythathashelpedLisaand Rachelsustaintheirparticipationingaming,andothermaledominatedenvironments,suchas
104
thosetheylikelyencounteredatMIT. TheundergraduatepopulationatMITisalmosthalffemale,butbecauseofthegreaternumber ofmalefacultyandmalegraduatestudents,manydepartmentsstillmaintainmoretraditionally masculinizedculture.Thismasculinizedcultureisdifferentfromthemasculinityofmalesports teamsandoffraternities.Itisinsteadageekmasculinityfocusedlessonphysicaldominance thanpowersoftechnology,science,rationality,andintelligence.MargolisandFisher(2002),in theirstudyofcomputersciencemajorsatCarnegieMellonUniversity,explainedtheinfluence ofgeekcultureonpeoplewhoparticipateinit,butdonotidentifywithit: Anexceptionallyhighlevelofobsessionandexpertisehasbecometheexpectednorm andhasraisedthebarforthelevelofknowledge,interest,andexpertiseidentifiedwith computersciencemajors.Forwomen,seeingmostoftheirmalepeersastotally absorbedincomputing,thefearthatIdon'tseemtoloveitasmuchasthemen,and thereforeIdon'tbelong,lurksinmanywomen'sdoubt.(p.70) Theviewthatyouneedtobeobsessedwithcomputersordigitalgamestobeacceptedinthe culturesthatsurroundthemisanobstacletoparticipation.Peoplewhoworkwithcomputersor playdigitalgamesalsohaveotherinterests.Thewomenof5Nhavehelpedcultivatea communitywherehavingotherinterestsisthenorm.Gamesarejustoneofmanyactivities availableforthemtobeactivecontributorstotheircommunity. Thewomenofthe5Ncommunityhadexperiencesinmaledominatedandhighlygendered contexts,whetherplayingdigitalgamesorparticipatingincomputerscienceandphysicsclasses inhighschooloratMIT.Theyarepartofaparticularpopulationofwomenwhohavethissetof experiencesandhavelearnedhowtonegotiatebetweengroupsofdifferentgenders.Asthe 105
focusofthisthesis,theyarenotmeanttorepresentwomeningeneral,butinsteadtheystand asexamplesofwomenwhohavesustainedaninterestinvideogamingthroughhighschooland intocollegedespitethemasculinestereotypesassociatedwithit. Wehaveseenthatthewomeninterviewedcametodigitalgamingthroughdifferentpathsand haveenjoyedplayingarangeofgamegenres.Atayoungage,allofthewomenweresituatedin groupsoffriendswhoplayedandsharedknowledgeaboutgames.Boysweretheprimary membersofthegroupstheyplayedwith,butthiswasdueinparttocircumstancesinwhich boysweretheonlyonestheycouldplaydigitalgameswith.AsRachelsaid: [I]fyougavemethechoice,wouldyouratherplayDDR[DanceDanceRevolution]18or CounterStrike19?Iwouldn'thavechosenCounterStrike,butIguessthepeopleIhung outwithplayedthatallthetimeandifyoureallywantedtogamewiththemthat'swhat youhadtoplay.Itwasreallyfun.IsuckedatFPS[firstpersonshooter]games...soit wasn'tthatIlikedtoplaythemcompetitively,ortobegoodatthem,Iplaythemmore forthesocialaspect,tohangoutwithmyguyfriends. Formostofthewomenin5N,theirchoicesatayoungeragewerelimitedbyaccesseitherto gamingplatformsortogroupsoffriendstoplaywith.Allwereabletofindboth,butthese factorsconstrainedhowandwhattheyplayed.Now,incollege,someoftheseconstraintshave beenliftedastheyhaveaccesstomoreresourcesandmoreagencyintheirgamingdecisions. Theyareabletonegotiatetheirwaysthroughvariousgamingcontexts.Howdothesewomen, whonowhavemorecontrolovertheirowngamingcontextsandpractices,interactwiththeir peersandwiththegamestheyplay?
18
106
DifferentContexts,DifferentModesofPlay Whilethereweresomecommonpatternsinthegaminghistoriesofthestudentswhohangout inthe5Nloungenamelybeingintroducedtogamesbymaleacquaintancesandfamily members,playingwithmostlymalegroupsofplayersinhighschool,andfeelingcomfortable interactinginthosegroupseachofthestudentsdiscusseddifferentpreferencesforgames, differentwaysofplayingthem,anddifferentpleasurestheyexperiencewhileplaying.These variationswereoftenrelatedtotheplayers'socialcontextsatthetime. Carr(2005)hasacknowledgedthecomplexrelationshipbetweensocialcontextsofgaming, gender,andplayers'preferences: Mappingpatternsinpreferencesispossiblebutpreferencesareanassemblage,made upofpastaccessandpositiveexperiencesandsubjecttosituationandcontext.The constituentsofpreference(suchasaccess)areshapedbygenderand,asaresult, gamingpreferencesmanifestalonggenderedlines...Toattributegamingtastesdirectly, solely,orprimarilytoanindividualsubjects'genderistoriskunderestimatingthe complexitiesofbothidentityandpreference.(p.479) Inaddressingstudiesthathavetriedtoascribegamingpreferencestoagender,Carrrecognizes thatthereismuchmoretounderstandinghowplayersinteractwithgamesthancanbe attributedtoanysinglefactor,especiallygender.EvidencefrommyresearchagreeswithCarr's assertionthatthereisabackandforthrelationshipofinfluencebetweengenderandgaming preferencesthatalsoispartofalargernetworkofpreviousexperienceandthecontextthe gametakesplacein.Iwasnotabletomaptheirgamepreferencesandplayingstylesalong genderlines,oranyonefactor.Insteadmyintervieweespreferencesandstyleschanged
107
dependingonhowmuchexperiencetheyhad,whotheyplayedwith,andwhattechnologywas availabletothem. Therehavebeenseveralattemptstocategorizeplayertypesandplayingstyles.Bartle(1996) hasstudiedMUDs(online,usuallytextbasedvirtualworlds)andidentifiedfourapproachesto playingthatarisefromtheinterrelationshipoftwodimensionsofplayingstyle:actionversus interaction,andworldorientedversusplayeroriented(p.1).Thefourplayertypesrepresent thepossibleintersectionsofthesedimensionsandaredescribedasachievers,explorers, socialisers,andkillers(p.3).Bartlerecognizesthattheseapproachescanoverlapdepending onplayermood,butthatmany(ifnotmost)playersdohaveaprimarystyle(p.3).Intryingto makesenseofthedifferentplayingpreferencesofthewomenandmenIinterviewed,however, Ifoundthesecategoriesinsufficientforexplainingtherangeofmotivationsthestudentshad forplayinggames.Yee(2006)expandedBartle'splayertaxonomyinordertoorganizeplayer motivationsinMMORPG's.Hisfindingsresultedintenmotivationcomponentsthatareclosely tiedtothemechanicsandcultureofMMORPG's.Whilethecomponentsofferedawiderrange ofmotivationsforplay,includingrelationships,customizationandroleplaying,theyweretoo specifictotheMMORPGgenreofgamestoorganizetheplayermotivationsinthe5N community. Inordertomakesenseofthediversemotivationsandstylesfortheplayersin5N,Iadapted categoriesfromBrown&Vaughan(2009),whicharemorespecificthanBartle's,butnotas specifictoMMORPG'sasYee'sframework.Brown&Vaughancalltheircategoriesplay
108
personalitiesordominantmodesofplay(p.65).Forthisthesis,thinkingofthemas personalitiesisnothelpfulbecausenoplayerstrictlyheldtoplayingaccordingtooneoverthe other.Consideringthemasmodesinsteadallowsmetospeakofthefluidityofstylesofmostof thestudentsin5Nandincludeinformationabouttheirchangingbehaviorsaccordingtowhat wasbeingplayed,whoelsewasplaying,andwhereitwasbeingplayed. Brown&Vaughan'smodesarenotspecifictodigitalgamesorgamesingeneral.Theyare relatedmoregenerallytoplay.Sincetheyarenottiedtogamingcontexts,theyallowforthe incorporationofopenendedtypesofplay.Theyarenotmeanttobeanexhaustivelistofthe waypeoplecanapproachplay,buttheyarehelpfulheretoorganizethegamingmotivations, pleasures,andstylesofthemenandwomenIinterviewed.BelowIwillusefourmodesthat builduponthoseidentifiedinBrown&Vaughan'swork,jokingaround,competing,directing, andcollecting,alongwithoneofmyown,socializing.
Jokingaround Allofthestudentsin5Njokedaround,eventhosewhodidn'tplaygames.Asexplainedearlier, jokingaroundwasoneofthemostvaluedformsofinteractioninthe5Nlounge.Studentstold recurringjokesaboutcharacterswhileplayingBrawlandparticipatedinwittybanterduring moviesorTVshows.Laughterwasaconstantpresenceinthelounge.Thegaminginthe5N loungetookplaceinaplayfulenvironmentwhereruleswerestretchedandmodifiedto maintainalightheartedandfunenvironmentforallparticipants.Patexplainedhowthepeople intheloungeappreciatedfunniness: Pat:Welikethingsthatarefunny.WehaveaFacebookpagewherepeoplepostthings 109
Patgavecriteriaforwhatisvaluedparticipationforthestudentsinthelounge.Ifsomethingis tooserious,itdidnotbelongthere.Thisisnottosaythatseriousthingsdidnothappeninthe lounge.Aswesawearlierpeopledidtheirhomework,ate,andworkedoutgroupissuesinthe lounge,butalwaysinawaythatkeptthemoodinthespacelightheartedandhumorous. Often,theseseeminglyproductiveactivitiesactuallymaintainabalancebetweenplayand work.Brown&Vaughanhaveproposedthat[t]hequalitythatworkandplayhaveincommon iscreativity...Playhelpsusdealwithdifficulties,providesasenseofexpansiveness,promotes masteryofourcraft,andisanessentialpartofthecreativeprocess(p.127).Studentsinthe loungeplayfullyapproachedmoreserioustaskslikecookingdinnerordoingtheirhomeworkto helpeachotherexplorenewpossibilitiesandsolvedifficultproblems.
Competing Severalstudieshavehypothesizedthatfemaleplayersareaversetoplayingcompetitively,or thatcompetitionisinconflictwithdoingafemininegender.(SchottandHorrell,2000; Walkderine,2006)AsIdiscussedabove,JensonanddeCastell(2008)arguethatcompetitionis notincompatiblewithfemininity,butthattherearewaysofbeingcompetitive,including benevolentcompetition,whichcanbeconstructedasmoreorlessmasculineorfeminine(p. 17).Boththemaleandfemaleplayersin5Nenjoywinning,butformostofthemitisnotthe primaryreasontheyplay.Throughjokingbanterandtrashtalk,mostoftheplayersrelishina winningmoment,buttheydonotlettheenjoymentofdominatingthegamelingermuch 110
longer.Rather,thegroupmovesontothenextround,gameoractivitywiththebeliefthat anyonecouldwinorlosenexttime. Benevolentcompetitionwasnottheonlytypeofcompetitionthefemaleplayerswere interestedin.CompetitioncameupininterviewswithbothJessicaandMei,whoeachsaidthat theyhadplayeddigitalgamesinothersocialcontextswherefellowplayershadpickedonthem ormadefunofthem.Thepleasuretheygotfromwinninginthesesituationswasmoreintense. Eachofthemdescribedatimeshewonwhileplayingagainstpeoplewhohadpickedonherin thepast: Jessica:Well,[amaleplayerfromdownstairs]isagamerdefinitely...Therewasone dayIwasreallymad,soIdragged[him]andtwoothersto5NtoplaySmash.They're completelybadatit.SoIcheeredupbecause,dude,I'mbeatingupthreebigguys! (laughs)So,[he's]thisbuff,kindofscarylookingguy.SoI'mbeatinghimandI'mlike, Yes! Mei:...Iwasreallyhappythisonetimebecause[twomaleplayers]alwaysmadefunof me.Therewasthisreallyfatcharacterin[LeagueofLegends,aMMORPG]...andthey're like,Youcan'tkillhimever.Someandtwofreshman,wedidatwoontwo...andwe likewhoopedtheirasses...andhewasplayingthereallyfatguy...andIkilledhim!Like4 times,Iwasreallyhappy.Andtheyendedupsurrendering.Itwaslikeeighttotwo.We won!Causetheykeptonmakingfunofmeforbeingacrappyplayer,andIwaslike, pwned20yourasses! Bothwomentookpleasureinhavingdefeatedsomeonewhohadteasedormadefunofthem inthepast.Theytookonmorecompetitivepersonalitiesbecausetherewasmoreatstakefor them.Theyhadareasontowanttoprovethemselvesasskillfultotheotherplayers.These instancesweredifferentcontextsfromtheplaytheyusuallyengagedinwhileplayinginthe5N lounge,wheretherewaslessemphasisonwinning.
20
ThewordpwnedismostoftenusedinInternetanddigitalgamingcontextstomeanthatyoubeatsomeone.
111
Directing MeiandPatwerebothnamedbyotherintervieweesasleadersinthe5Ngroupthoughthey hadverydifferentstyles.Theywereusuallythestudentsdirectingthesocializingaroundthe gamesbeingplayed.PatwasmentionedafewtimesasAndres0.9,ajokethat acknowledgestheinfluenceAndreshadonformingtheexuberant,trashtalkingstyleofplaying gamesinthelounge.The0.9playsonthewaymostsoftwareisnamedwhenitprogresses intoanewerversion.Inthiscase,however,PatisdeemedAndres0.9insteadof2.0 becauseAndreswassuchabigpersonalitytoreplaceinthecommunity. Playingwithtraditionalgenderroles,RachelexplainedhowPatandMeiareoftenseenas havingtwoverydifferentwaysofdirectingthecommunity: WeoftenjokethatMeiisourfatherfigureandPatisourmotherfigure.CausePat's morelike,hefocusesmoreonthesocialaspectandmakingsureeverybody'shavingfun, whereasMei'slike,Noyoumustbegood,youmustbereallygood.
112
Collecting Rachelwastheplayerwhomostexplicitlyexpressedaninterestincollecting.Shewasableto findpleasureinaccumulationbyplayingPokemon,agamethatincludeshundredsofcharacters thatplayerscansearchforandcapturefortheircollections. Rachel:I'mahugecollector...I'mprobablyOCD[ObsessiveCompulsiveDisorder]about collecting.I'mapackrat.Iguessthataspectofthegameandhowthere'slikeasetway toprogressthroughthegame,butthere'salotofdeviationsthroughoutthegame.You havetogothroughallofthemandgetbadges,trytogetthroughPokemonLeagueand collectthemall,butthere'salotofsidegamesyoucandelveintoandhiddenitemsand tweaksinthegame.It'sreallyfuntogothroughandfindthemall.Especiallybackthen whenwedidn'thaveanywalkthroughs.Itreallywasjustanexplorationprocess,andI thinkthatwasahugepartofoursocialgaming.
ForRachel,Pokemonofferedheramixedpleasureofexploringandcollecting.Sheself
identifiedasapackratatermmostoftenusedtodescribethecollectionofphysicalobjects. SheenjoyedboththecollectingofthecharactersingameandthePokemonrelatedfigurines outofgame.Theactofcollectingisnotjustapleasureinandofitselfthough.ThePokemon charactersonecollectsinthegamecanhelponeadvance,becauseastrongergroupof characterswillhelpaplayerwinbattles. Thereexistsablurrylineingamesbetweencollectingforthepleasureitbrings,andcollecting items,coins,orpointstoprogressinthegameoftencalledachieving.Jasondescribedhow heusedhistimeplayingalonetodothis: Jason:IfI'mbymyself,Iendupachievementhuntingcauseit'ssomethingtodowhen thestoryisover...I'llplayagainjusttotwiddle...withoutadirection,noendgoal.You getthefeelingthatyoucouldbedoingsomethingmuchmoreproductive.Partofthe appealoftheachievementsandtheiranalogsingeneral,becauseitgivesyousomething toaimfor,'speciallyincaseslikeBrawlorHalo.You'realwaysstrivingtogetbetter,but 113
thatfeelslikeworkalotofthetime. Interviewer:Soachievementisgoodwhenyou'reonyourown? Jason:Yeah,it'slessimportantwhenI'mplayingsocially,'causethefunshiftstobeing morerelatedtothecompany.Theinteractionthere,becauseit'sasharedexperience youcantalkaboutit,respondtoeachotheryoucancritiqueorcomplimenteachother, itsnotsomuchaboutkillingtime. Jasonexplainedhowhecouldhavedifferentpleasuresinthesamegamedependingonhis socialcontextwithotherpeopleoralone.Thiskindofachievingmightleadtoaslippage betweenplayandwork,aswesawabovewithRachel'sexplanationofhowsheplaysgames whenshewantstotakeabreakfromhomeworkinordertofeelasenseofaccomplishment. Thisapproachactuallychangedfromwhenshewasinhighschool: Rachel:Iwasnotlikethatinhighschool.WhenIgamedinhighschoolitwasforactual entertainment.Like,IwantedtoplayDDRorPokemonforthesakeofplayingPokemon. Notlike,Ineedabreak,nowIshouldplayPokemon.
ThemostpopularreasonforgamingamongallthepeopleIinterviewedin5N,maleand
Socializing
114
Interviewer:Whatarethegamegenresyoulike? Jason:...Typicallyoffline,even[games]withstrongonlinecommunitiesI'llplayoffline. PartlybecauseofthetimeandthecommunityIdon'tfindcompelling.Beingincollege youaresurroundedbycommunityalready.Itsmuchmoreengagingtotalktopeople yourage,yourlevel,withwhomyouhavealotincommon,don'tseenecessityofgoing online.Especiallysinceyou'resurroundedbygameplaysopeoplegetfixatedonthat. Becomeshardertotalktopeoplethatway...Rhythmgamestoo,IlikeRockBand,Igeta kickoutofit.Ithasaparticipatoryaspecttoit. RachelandJasonexpresshowmuchtheyenjoyplayingagamecollaborativelywithothers.This isespeciallytrueofgameslikeRockBandwhereplayerscanhelporsaveoneanotherwhile workingtowardsacommongoalofcompletingasongorearningmorepoints.LisaandJessica alsorealizedthattheyplaydifferentlywhentheyarearoundothers.Somethingthatcouldbe mundanewhenplayingalonebecomesperformativeandmorefunwithagroupoffriends: Lisa:Idefinitelygetinto[RockBand]sometimes.Ijuststartwailingrandomlyandnot actuallyplayingtherealnotes.Butwhenyou'resingingitwillactuallyhelpthegroup,it willbebettersocialatmosphereintheroomifyouactuallyactoutyoursingingandstuff orwhenyou'replayingguitarifyoudance.
115
Whatisagame?Whoisagamer? Indoingthisresearch,Iwasinterestedinwhetherornotmyintervieweesconsideredgamingas partoftheiridentityandhowthatmightaffecthowtheyplayed.Inordertoexplorethis,I askedthestudentswhoplayedgamesin5Nwhethertheyconsideredthemselvesgamersor not,aswellaswhattheyconsideredtobeagame.Boththetermsgamerandgamehave takenonspecializednotionswithindigitalgamingcultureandtheyusuallyprecludenondigital gamingliketabletoporcardgames.Theboundariesofwhomorwhatislabeledwitheach termarecontinuallycontestedandredrawn. SchottandHorrell,(2000)concludedtheirstudyongirlsandwomenwhoplaydigitalgamesby offeringanalternativeconcepttothemasculinisedheavygamer:thegirlgamer(p.50).But thisnewcategorizationresultedinthecreationofafemalestereotypethatdoesn'trecognize therangeofgamingstylesandmotivationsthatgirlsandwomenhave.Theirfinding,suchas: girlgamersrejectedgamessuchassportsgamesandviolent,combatfocusedgamesthatare notopentocreativeinterpretation,domoretocompartmentalizetheinterestsoffemale players,thanshowtheirdiversityofinterests(p.50).
116
Intheexcerptsbelowfrommyinterviews,thesubjectsusethetermgameasasynonymfor digitalgame.Theabsenceoftalkaboutnondigitalgameswasmostlikelybecausethe interviewswereinitiallyframedtobeaboutdigitalgames.Ithadbeenmadecleartothe intervieweethatIwasprimarilyinterestedindigitalgaming,sowhenIaskedaquestionsuchas Whatisorisnotagametoyou?theyansweredintermsofdigitalgames. Someofthestudentsin5Nrelatedstaticimpressionsofwhatagameis,suchasMeiwhosaid thatgameshadtorequiresomekindofskill.Thiswasinresponsetoaskingheraboutthe popularFacebookgameFarmville,whichshedidnotconsideragame.GameslikeFarmvilleand TheSims,bothofwhichhappentobeverypopularwithfemaleplayers,aresometimescalled simulationsinsteadofgames.Theyareopenendedandoftenmimicanaspectofreallife.Jason recognizedthisasanareawherewhatisandisn'tagamestartedtoblur: Jason:SimsIwouldconsideragame;Idon'tplayFarmvillesoIreallydon'tknow. There'sthatfineline,orblurry,betweengamesandsimulation...withdigitalgamesit's easytomakethedistinctionifit'snotagame,it'samovie.
Rachel'sdefinitionofagameismoredynamic.Shestatesthatherconceptionhaschangedover theyearsdependingonhersocialcontext: Rachel:Forvideogames,definitionshavekindofchangesthroughoutmylife.Inhigh school,avideogameeithermeantanMMOoranFPS.PeopleneverthoughtofDDRor RockBandasavideogamesomuch.ToplayavideogamewaslikeSmash,Counter Strike,WOWguildwars...IfyouweretotalkaboutPokemoninmyhighschool...they'd consideritagame,butnotagamergame.It'snotatypicalgamethatwouldbeplayed bythegamerbunch. Interviewer:Whatmadethatdistinction? Rachel:Idon'tthinkhandheldgameswerebig...ItwasalotofconsolegamesandPC games.Idon'tknowwhatitwasabouthandheldgamesthatdidn'tappealtothem... Interviewer:WhataboutFarmvilleandtheSims? Rachel:IplayCafeWorldallthetimeonFacebook.Yeahitwouldbeagame.Notquite inthesocialcontextofagamergame,butIfeelliketheusualtypeofgameforgamer 117
communityisconsolegamesorPCgames.Whereasontheoutskirtsofthatwouldbe handheldgames,onlineflashgames. HereRachelexplainedwhatagamewasinhersocialcontextofhighschool.Sheadmittedto beingapersonwhoplaysgamesmostlyforsocialreasons,andweseeinheranswerthatshe waslookingtohowotherpeopleinhersurroundingsdefinedgamestoconstructherown understandingofwhatdidanddidnotfitin.GamesforRachelinhighschoolmeant, MMORPG'sandFPS'sthatpeopleplayedtogether.Otherpopulargamesthatwerenotplayed withothersweregames,butnotgamergames.Shecreatedthecategoriesgamergames, socialgames,andhandheldgamestodifferentiatebetweenthegamessheplayedandsaw othersplay.Thegamergameswerethefirstcategoryshedrewout,anditwasthemost sociallyacceptabletypeofgametodiscussandplaywithothersatschool.Shealsopointedout theimportanceofplatform,whichweseecomeupaswellwhenpeopledefinegamer.Console gamesandPCgameswererelatedwithbeingagamerandplayingmorecompetitively. Contributingtothisunderstandingcouldbethatthemosthighprofilegamingtournaments usuallyinvolveconsolegamingoracomputerLANparty.Handheldgameswerenotpopular, althoughsheisnotsurewhy;butitislikelytheywereassociatedwithyoungerormore femininegenderedgames. EachpersonIinterviewedhaddifferentcriteriaforwhatisagameandwhoisagamer.For games,thecriteriaranged,fromwhetherornottherewasagoaltowhatplatformitwas playedontowhetheritrequiredstrategy.Aperson'scriteriaforwhoisagamerdependedon thelevelofexperienceofthepeoplewhoplayedgamesaroundthem,whatwasbeingplayed, andthelevelofintensityofplay. 118
Themeaningsofgamertotheintervieweeswerejustasvariedastheywereforgamebutthere wasmoreatstakeinthedefinitionbecausetheywerealsodefiningthemselves.Fronetal. (2007)exploretheimplicationsofhowgamerhascometobegenerallydefinedindigital gamingculture. Thenotionofthegamerwhichhasdefinedtherhetoricofgamemarketingand fandom,hascreatedasubculturewhichisexclusionaryandalienatingtomanypeople whoplaygames,butwhodonotwanttobeassociatedwiththecharacteristicsand gameplaystylescommonlyassociatedwithhardcoregamers.Thisstereotypemay actuallypreventsomepeoplefromplayinggamesentirely.(p.310) AsIwillshowthegamerstereotypethatFronetal.discussaboveisaguidepostforhowmost ofthe5Nstudentsmadesenseoftheirowngamingidentity.Anotherfactorthatmadethis stereotypeevenmoreexaggeratedfortheseplayersin5Nwasthatthestudentsweresituated atMIT,wherethereisaheavygamingandgeekpresencethatcanraisethebarofwhoself identifiesasagamer.Thestudentsdefinedthemselvesrelativetootherpeoplearoundthem. ForsomestudentsinthisgroupatMIT,gamerstoodforthemostextremeplayers.Itwasa labelreservedforonlythemostdedicatedandskilledplayersoftraditionalhardcoredigital games. DuringaninterviewwithJessicaandMei,Iuncoveredatensionbetweenthemsurroundingthe negativeconnotationsometimesassociatedwiththetermgamer: Mei:IguessIplayalotmoregamesthanJessica.I'manavidgamer. Jessica:Idon'tconsidermyselfagamer. Interviewer:Howdoyoutwodefinegamer? Mei:Iguesssomeonewhoplayseveryday?NowthatI'mnotatmyparents'Iplaya gameofLeagueofLegendseveryday. Jessica:Ithinkit'sforme,itspeoplewhofeellikethere'ssomethingmissingifthey 119
don'tplayagame.Kindoflikeaddicts. Mei:Hey! Jessica:Ifwetookawayallyourgamesupplies,wouldyoufeellost? Mei:Yes,Iwouldinfact Jessica:Thereyougo.Withoutmystuff,I'dbeok. Interviewer:Soyouthinkitbecomesapartofyouridentity? Jessica:IstoppedplayingConqueronceIgotherebecausenoneofmyfriendsIonly wentonlinebecausemyfriendswereonlineandIwouldjustplaywiththembecauseI can'tcontactthemthroughanyothermeans.AndthenSmashissomethingIjustdo, Ohheywe'reallplayingSmash,playSmash...Idon'tfeellikeitspartofwhoIam.They don'tsay,OhsheplaysSmashalot,orShegoesonlinealot.Ijustdon'treallythink thatit'sthatmuchapartofmeiftherewasnoWiianymore.I'dfeelsadcauseIwould missplayingbutIwouldn'tbelike,OhIneedtogogetaWii. Mei'scriterionissimpleandonefaceted;frequencyofplayismostimportanttoherwhen decidingwhoisagamer.ToJessica,though,gamingforagamerismoreofahabit.Meiis immediatelyoffendedbyJessica'sview.Thetwostudentshaveverydifferentconceptionsof thetermgamer,whichareinfluencedbytheirexperienceswithgamingandtheirmotivations forplaying.Jessica'sidentityismuchlessintegratedwithgaming.Sheframesgamingasan excusetosocialize,notasanactivitythatoffersenoughpleasureforhertoparticipateinitifno oneelseisplaying. Surprisingly,LisaprobablyplayedthemostdigitalgamesofanyoneIinterviewed(threetofour hourseverydayandmoreontheweekends),yetshedistancedherselffromthetraditional gamerstereotype.Shemadeadistinctionbetweenhardcoreandnonhardcoregamers. Juul(2010)hasrecognizedthisgrowingdichotomybetweenstereotypesofhardcoreand, whathecalls,casualplayers: Stereotypeofahardcoreplayer...hasapreferenceforsciencefiction,zombies,and fantasyfictions,hasplayedalargenumberofvideogames,willinvestlargeamountsof timeandresourcestowardplayingvideogames,andenjoysdifficultgames. 120
Stereotypeofacasualplayer...hasapreferenceforpositiveandpleasantfictions,has playedfewvideogames,iswillingtocommitlittletimeandfewresourcestoward playingvideogames,anddislikesdifficultgames.(p.8) Juulhasadmittedthesearestereotypesthatdonotfittherealityofmostplayers,buttheyare representativeofcommonconceptionsoftwoverydifferenttypesofplayer.Inherinterview, Lisadrewasimilardistinctionbetweenhergroupoffriendsandhardcoregamers.However, shetiedherdescriptionsmoretotheplatformandthelevelofcompetitionthanthekindsof gamesorhowmuchtimewasspentplaying: Interviewer:Doyouconsideryourselfagamer?Whatkindsoftermsdoyouuse aroundgaming?Doyoucallyourfriendsotherthings? Lisa:Idefinitelycallus,allmyfriends,gamers,butIwouldsaythatwe'remore leisure,softcore,artisticorfun,socialgaming.Ipicturegaminglikethere'shardcore, whichismostlyFPStheygetintotournamentsandcompetitiononline.MostlylikeXbox centered,Iwouldseeaslikehardcoregaming.AndsoftcorewouldbelikeNintendo,the Wii,mostlylikejustfungamesyouplaywithyourfamilyandfriends. Interviewer:Soisthatwhatyouthinkisimportant?I'veheardthatbefore,thatyou're softcoreyou'reacausal,you'redoingitforthefunandifyou'rehardcoreyou're doingitforsomethingelse,likework.Doyouagreewiththat?Arehardcoregamers doingitforfun? Lisa:Ithinkthere'sfuninitforthemto,butItrytostickmoretojustplainfunandless competitionfun.
Lisaacceptedthelabelofgamerhereforherselfandherfriends,butquicklyspecifiedasub
121
fromcasualorsocialgaming,Lisahadtheoppositereaction.Sheidentifiedmorewithcasual gamingbecauseshedoesnotwanttoidentifywithhighlevelsofcompetitionorgamingthatis tooserious. Whenaskedaboutgamers,Rachel'sdefinitionchangeddependingonhercontext.Shewas affiliatedwithagroupofpeopleshecalledgamersinhighschoolbutdidn'tfeellikeshewasa partofthegroup.Shedidplaygames,somegamergames,butalsootherkindsofgames.She calledherselfmoreofacasualorsocialgamer: Interviewer:Doyoucallyourselfagamer? Rachel:Neverthoughtaboutthis.Mydefinitionofagamerhaschangedalot throughoutmylife.Inhighschool,gamerswerethepeoplewhosattogetherandhad LANpartiesontheweekendandtalkedaboutCounterStrikeallthetimeandguildwars andstuff.Therewasaclearlydefinedgamerbunchatourschool.Iwasnotpartofthe gamerbunch.Iwasprobablyintheoutskirtsofthegamerbunch.Ihadconnectionsto thegamerbunchthroughmyAPcomputerscienceclass,buteventhepeopleinmyAP computerscienceclassnotallofthemwereinthegamerbunch.Alotofuswerejust friendswiththepeoplewhoweregamers...Ifeellikethepeoplewhoaregamersarethe oneswhoarereallyintoit.That'sliketheirmainhobby.Whenagamecomesoutthey'll bethefirstpeopletobuyit...Whereasthere'sjustcasualgamers,likeI'mkindofa casualgamer.Orasocialgamer,likeMMO'saremoresocialgamingforme.Idon'tgo onforlevelingupandthesakeofguildraids.Igoontohangoutwithmyfriends.
122
calledagamer?Shouldtheywanttobecalledone?Thereistensionaroundtheterm gamerbecauseitisbeingusedtorepresenttoosmallofaportionofthegamingparticipants. Itisasifthetermfilmgoerwasonlyusedtorepresentteensthatwatchscarymovies.There arespecializedtermsinfilmthatdescribeslicesofthefilmgoingaudience,forwhomwatching filmsiscentraltotheiridentity;forexample,cineaste.Withgaming,however,thereexistsno suchnuancedterminologyforthegrowingnumberofidentitiesassociatedwithit.Also,the termswedouseupholdnormativeunderstandingsofgender.Sofar,theindustryandthe peoplewhogamehavebeensofteningorsharpeningthetermgamertofittheirpurposes. Thefutureofthetermisuncertain,andevenifitdisappearsfromthenomenclatureofgaming culture,woulditsbanishmenteliminatetheviewthatconsolegamingisaboy'sworld? JasonandPat,thetwomalemembersofthe5NcommunitywhoIinterviewed,bothidentified themselvesasgamers,buttheyalsohadflexibleunderstandingsofwhatthatmeant.WhenI askedPathowhedefinedagamer,hisanswerwasmoreopenendedthanthehardcoreand casualstereotypesofferedabove.Heputthedecisionofwhetherornotsomeoneisagamer inthehandsofthepersonbeinglabeledinawaythatisreflectiveoftheinclusivecultureofthe lounge: Interviewer:Wouldyoucallthepeopleonthisfloorgamers?Whatdoesthatterm meantoyou? Pat:Idon'tthinkIwouldcallanyoneagamer.That'satermthatyoucanonlydecideif itappliestoyourselfornot.IknowsomepeoplewhoplayonlythingslikeWiiSportsand theyconsiderthemselvesgamersbecausetheygetreallyintowhattheydo.Orpeople wholikecasualplayreallyhardcoregameslikeHaloorGearsofWar. Interviewer:Soyouthinkhastobeaselfdefinition? Pat:YeahIdo.Sosayyouonlyplayonegamebutyou'rereallyintoit,oryouplaya wholebunchofgamesbarelyscratchingthesurface.It'shardtosay.WouldIconsider myselfagamer,yes.ButIcan'texplainwhy.It'snotlikeanobjective;I'veplayedthis 123
percentageofthegamesthatexistintheworldforthisamountoftime. Interviewer:Soisitlikewhenyouembraceit? Pat:Yeahit'sanidentityyouhavetoembrace. Patseemedtorecognizetheroleofsocialcontextandthemultitudeofcriteriathatare involvedinmakingsenseofwhatagamermightbe.Underhisterms,thepeopleplayinggames havetheagencytoclaimthatidentityforthemselves.Thisisnottoignorethatmanypeople, includingthegamesindustry,donothavetheabilitytonamewhoisinthegamerclubandwho isout,butPatgivesusaglimpsehereofanewapproachtodefininggamerthatpermitseach persontodecideforthemselvesiftheywillaccept,reject,ornegotiatethelabel.Thisapproach isonepossibilityfornegotiatingtheterm,butfornowgamerislikelynotahelpfultermfor describingmostpeoplewhoplaydigitalgames.
Conclusion
Thischapterexplainstheindividualexperiences,motivations,andpreferencesofsome membersofthe5Nplaycommunity.Therearemanyotherstudentswhoparticipatein activitiesintheloungeorpassthroughnowandagain.Theirstoriesarelikelytooverlapat pointswiththosepresentedhere,butmorelikelytheywouldvarybasedontheirowngaming histories(orlackthereof),playingstyles,andsocialcontexts. Understandingplayersattheindividuallevelisimportantinordertoshowthattheir relationshipstogamesarenotstatic,butinsteadareconstantlychangingalongwiththeir currentsocialcontext.AsIshowed,outofthecurrentwomenwhoplaydigitalgamesinthe5N lounge,mostofthemplayeddigitalgamesgrowingupandtheyplayedalongsidemales.There
124
werenotmanyfemalegamingmentorsforthemwhilegrowingup.Thismeantthatstudents likeLisa,Mei,andRachelhadtonegotiatehowtoparticipateinmalemajoritycontexts.Now, whileattendingaprestigiousuniversitythatfocusesonscienceandtechnologyandhasalong traditionofsupportingageekculture,itispossiblethattheywilldrawontheirabilitiesto interactintraditionallymaledominatedfields.Therewillalsobenewrolesforthesestudents asmentorstootherwomenwhotheyintroducetodigitalgameplay.Thisinformalmentoring systemisalreadyoccurring,asIshowedinChapterOneanditwillbeinterestingtoobserve whetherthereisashiftinwhointroducesthenextgenerationofgirlstodigitalgaming. WorkingoffofBrown&Vaughan'smodesofplay,Iwasabletomapthevarietyofmotivations forplayandgamepreferencesexhibitedbythestudentsinthe5Ncommunity.Thesearenot genderspecific,butinsteadarerelatedtowhataccessthestudentshavetogames,their experiencesgamingindifferentcontexts,andwhatkindsofplaytheygetpleasurefrom. Socializingwasthemostprevalentmotivationforboththefemaleandmalestudents,whichis nottypicallyaqualityassociatedwithdigitalgameplay.Theindividualmotivationstosocialize whilegaminghelpedmakethe5Ncommunitywhatitwas,andtheyalsoallowedroomfor otherinterestsandsocialmotivationsofothernongamingstudents.Thesestudentsplayed digitalgamesthatrequiredothercontextsoraccesstoequipmentlikeRockBandorMMORPG's likeWorldofWarcraft,buttheywerealsointerestedinthekindofcolocated,multiplayer,low stakessocialgamingthatwentonthe5Nloungeasawayofinteractingwiththeirfriendsand beingexposedtootheractivitieslikedoinghomework,eating,orwatchingmovies.
125
Inthesamewaythatgamingpreferencesandmotivationsamongthestudentsvarydepending oncontext,sodidtheirunderstandingofthetermsgameandgamer.Whilethesamplesize wastoosmalltodrawgeneralconclusions,itwasinterestingthatthetwomaleplayersdidnot hesitatetocallthemselvesgamers,butmostofthewomenresistedthattermormodifiedit withwordslikesocialorcasual.Gamerhascometobeatermthatistiedtoastereotype thatdoesnot(orneverdid)effectivelydescribetherangeofpeoplewhoplaydigitalgames. Becauseofthis,women,andpresumablymen,whodonotwanttoidentifywiththehardcore stereotypefeeltheneedtonegotiatethemeaningofthetermandchangeittofittheirown gamingstyles.Gameralsofailstoincludemanypeople,likeJanelle,whoplayonlynondigital games.Themorenarrowlypeopledefinethesetermsthemoretheycanbeleveragedto excludeplayersfromgamingculture.Forthispaper,findingtheessenceornatureofeachof thewordsisnotrelevant(orpossible).Instead,thefocushasbeenonunderstandinghow peoplesociallyconstructthemeaningsofeachterm,whatfactorsaffectthosemeaning,and howthosemeaningscanaffecttheparticipationofothers.
126
CONCLUSION
Focusonplayratherthangames
127
determinedthevaluedmembersofthecommunity. The5Ncommunity'sfocusontheplayprocesshelpedmaketheirgameplaymoreinclusive. Studentswholackedexperienceorskillwerenotkeptfromparticipating.Severalofthewomen inthecommunitywerefortunatetohavelonghistoriesofplayingdigitalgames,accessto consoles,andnetworksofotherexperiencedfriendstohelpthembuildupskilllevels.This addedtotheirabilitiestoparticipateinthegamingontheirfloor.However,therewerefemale andmalestudentswhodidnothavethisbackgroundandwerestillabletoparticipateinone formofgamingoranother.Thesharedgoalofalltheplayers,whichwastotakepartina playfulsocialactivity,influencedthestandardstheyusedtoacceptnewplayers.Thesocial barrierstoentryandtheinterpersonalstakeswerealmostalwayslow. Thegamesthatwereplayedbythestudentswereusuallyeasytolearn,andiftheywerenot,as wasthecasewithTractor,therewereotherstudentswhowerewillingtomentornewplayers. Evenifsomeoneattemptedtoplaythegameafterlearningthebasicrulesanddidnotplaywell aswasthecaseformethatplayerwasnotseenaswithoutvaluetothegame.Newcomers couldparticipateinthesocializingaroundthegamewhetheritwasthewittybanter,telling storiesandjokes,orsingingsongs.Evenstudentswhodidnothaveanyinterestinplaying digitalgamescouldfeelaconnectiontoplayersbyengaginginthesocializingaroundthegame. Asaresearcher,choosingtoframethestudentsof5Nasaplaycommunityinsteadofagame community,allowedmetoshowhowgamingwaspartofanetworkofsocialactivitiesthattook
128
placeinthelounge.Whengroupsplaydigitalornondigitalgamestogether,wecanbequickto definethembytheirinterestingamingalone.AswesawinChapterThree,mostofthefemale studentschosenottoidentifyasgamers.Theynegotiatedhowtheypositionedthemselves withdigitalgamingculture.Digitalgamingisbecomingmoreubiquitousandfittinginto people'slivesinnewanddiverseways.Asresearcherswehavetorecognizethatgamingcanbe justoneofmanyactivitiesinwhichpeopleparticipate. Gamesstudiesisamaturingfield.Gamesresearchersshouldconsidertheaffordancesof broadeningtheirscopeofresearchtoincludemoreoftheprocessofplayanditscontext. Gamesasformalsystemsare,ofcourse,akeypartofresearchinthefield.Awiderscopeof researchthatincludesmoreopenendedplaywillhelpusformamorecompletepictureofhow gamingfitsintopeople'slives,themanypurposesitserves,anddiversepleasuresitoffers.
Thetermgamerisnothelpful Thestereotypicalunderstandingofgamertoooftenmakesassociationsonlywithplayers whofollowthehardcoreethicandmakedigitalgamingcentraltohowtheydefine themselves.Thetermgamerdoesnotadequatelyrepresentthemajorityofpeoplewhoplay digitalgames.Italsorarelyisusedtorefertopeoplewhoplaynondigitalgames,whichcan limitourunderstandingofhowdigitalandnondigitalgamingpracticesoverlapandintersect.In research,weshouldrecognizetheweightthathasbeengiventothetermgameranduseit carefully.Itisalsonotsufficienttorelyonmodifierslikecasualorgirltostretchthewaythe termcanbeused.Thesemodifiersmaintainadefaultunderstandingofgamerashardcore, male,andoftenwhite. 129
Irefrainedfromusingthetermgamertodescribeanyoneinthisthesis,unlesstheychosethe term.Instead,Ireferredtomysubjectsasstudentsandplayerstermsthatcarryfewer normativeassumptionsaboutgender,age,race,ethnicity,oridentificationswithcertainmodes ofplay. Iamnotsuggestingthenthatwechangethemeaningofthetermgamer,butratherthatwe lookfornewandmoreopenwaystodescribepeoplewhofindpleasureinplayinggames, digitalandnondigital.Byusingthewordplayerwhenreferringtosomeoneinvolvedina game,theimplicitemphasiswouldshiftfromtheformalobject(gamer)totheactionofthe participant(player).Fornow,theusageofthetermgamernarrowsourunderstandingof whoplaysgamesandhowtheyplayattheverymomentwhengamingisspreadingtonewer andmorediverseaudiencesandvenues,including,classrooms,retirementhomes,andcell phones.Weshouldbeeagertoincludemoreplayersingaming.
Digitalgamescanfacilitatesocializing
130
Digitalgamesinthe1980'sand1990'stendedtobesingleplayerordesignedforheadtohead competitionbetweenplayers.However,gamesnowarebecomingnetworkedonlineor designedtoincludecollaborativemodeswherelargenumbersofpeopleplaytogethertowards thesamegoals.Wearestilltryingtobreakfromthemoldsofearlierdigitalgamedesignand stereotypicalconstructionsofwhoplaysandhowtheyplay.Researchaboutonlinegaming oftenrecognizesthesocialaspect;perhapsthatisbecausecommunicationisusuallyrecorded onchatscreensormessageboardsandcanbebetterdocumentedthantheconversationsthat occurduringofflinegameplay.Ihaveattemptedtocapturesomeoftheephemeralbitsof conversationthatoccurredduringgaminginthe5Nlounge,butthereisaneedformore documentationandresearchthatexploressocialaspectsofdigitalgamesthatareplayedin othercolocated,offlinecontexts.Wecanthenlearnmoreabouthowthesedifferentsocial contextsinfluencewhoparticipatesinplayingandwhoisleftout.
Thereisnotypicalfemaleplayer
131
Allofthefemaleplayersin5Nwereintroducedtoplayingdigitalgamesbymaleplayers.In addition,mostofthesewomenwentontoplaygamesingroupsthatweremadeupmostlyof maleplayers.Insomeways,theseinteractionsmayhavebenefitedthewomenastheylearned howtonegotiatesocialinteractionswithgroupsoftheirmalepeers.Nowthatthewomenare atMITtheyarelikelytofindthemselvestheonlywomaninsomeclassesorlabs.Perhapsthey willdrawonthisfamiliaritywithnegotiatingmaledominatedcontextsasaskilltobetter positionthemselvesforsuccess. Womenplayanewandgrowingroleindigitalgamingculture.Thewomenwhoplayinthe5N loungehavethepotentialtointroducenewgirlsandwomentothepleasuresofplayinggames. Thisgenerationofyoungfemaleplayerswillbethefirstsizeablegroupthathashadthe opportunitytoplaydigitalgamesforalmosttheirentirelives.Itisyettobeseenhowthenext generationofgirlswillbeaffectedbytheirmentoringrelationshipswitholderfemaleplayers. 132
Theroleoffemalementors
Mentoringmightmakegirlsmorelikelytoidentifywithgamingculture,orchangepopular conceptionsaboutwhoplays.Itispossiblethatgirlswillbeexposedtodifferentkindsofgames thantheywouldiftheywereplayingwithboys.WouldRachelorLisahaveplayedthesame gamesgrowingupiftheyhadhadfemalementors?Thepointwouldnotbetomovetowardsa segregatedmodelwherewomenintroducegirlsandmenintroduceboystogaming.Instead, femaleandmaleplayersshouldbeintroducingbothgirlsandboystodigitalgames.Forachild tohavebothamotherandafatherasgamingmentormightshowherorhimdifferent approachestoplayingagameorplayingwithothers.Havingmorefemalementorswillatthe veryleastopenupthepossibilitiesofwhatgamingculturecanbeandoffermoreoptionsfor newplayers.
Myaccesstoconductparticipantobservationsandinterviewswithmembersofthe5N communitywasinvaluabletounderstandingwhatfactorsinfluencetheinclusivenessofa communitythatplaysdigitalgamestogether.Givenmoretimeandaccessthough,Iwouldhave likedtohaveincorporatedotherdimensionstomyresearch.First,Iwasnotabletosetup interviewswitheverymemberofthecommunity.Whilethismaynothavebeennecessary,I wouldhaveespeciallyliketotalkedtomoreofthemalestudents,aswellasmorestudentswho didnotparticipateingamingactivities.BytalkingtwothesesubgroupsofthecommunityI couldlearnmoreabouthowtheirexperiencesdifferedoroverlappedwiththoseofthefemale players. Second,Iwouldliketohavemademystudymorecomparativewithothergroupswhoplayed 133
Furtherresearch
digitalgamestogether.Inthesamedormasthe5Nloungetherewereatleasttwootherhalls thathadgroupsofstudentswhoplayedgamestogether.Bothgroupsweremadeupofmostly malestudents.OnegroupplayedmorefirstpersonshootergamesonXboxorPS3'sintheir individualrooms.TheothergroupplayedBrawlandMelee,aswellassomeWiibasedRPG's.I talkedwithMeiandJessicabrieflyintheirinterviewaboutthelattergroupandinquiredwhy, eventhoughtheywerefriendswiththoseplayers,theydidnotplayBrawlwiththem.Jessica responded:Icangohangout,butIdon'tquiteIdon'tfitin.Ifeelveryfemale.Ihadhoped tohavetimetospendinthisotherspacewithsomeofthefemaleplayersfrom5Ntofigureout whatmadethemfeeldifferent,butunfortunatelyIwasnotableto.Thiskindofcomparative studywithothergroupsatMIT,orothergroupsatadifferentcollegecouldyieldvery interestingevidenceofhowsocialcontextinfluencesplayersofdigitalgames. Furtherresearchcouldfillmanyofthegapsthatremaininunderstandingtheadvantagesof creatingspacesfocusedonplayasopposedtogaming,includinghowitmightenablemore peopletoparticipate,especiallythosepeoplewhofeelliketheycannotorshouldnot participate.Thestudentsinthe5Nloungeweregenerouswiththeirtimeandtheirhonesty abouthowtheycreatedandsustainedtheircommunity.Theyarenotmeanttobeportrayed hereasanutopia,butinsteadasanexampleofanalternativetothemorestereotypicalgaming culturesweoftenseeinmovies,gamingmagazines,andeveningamesresearch.Mypurposein analyzingthiscommunity'ssocialcontext,gamepreferences,playingstyles,andpersonal experiencesistoaddtothebodyofevidencethatshowsdigitalgamingcultureisintransition, evolvinganddiversifying.Itisuptousasresearcherstokeepupwithitspace,ifnotpushit evenfurthertowardsgreaterinclusiveness. 134
REFERENCES
Bartle,R.(1996).PlayerswhosuitMUDs.Retrievedfrom http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm.
Brown,S.,&Vaughan,C.(2009).Play:HowItShapestheBrain,OpenstheImagination,and InvigoratestheSoul.PenguinGroup.
Bryce,J.,&Rutter,J.(2002).Killinglikeagirl:genderedgamingandgirlgamers'visibility.Paper presentedattheComputerGameandDigitalCultureConference.Tampere,Finland.
Burgess,J.,Green,J.,Jenkins,H.,&Hartley,J.(2009).YouTube:Onlinevideoandparticipatory culture.London:Polity.
Cassell,J.,&Jenkins,H.(1998).FromBarbietoMortalKombat:GenderandComputerGames. Cambridge,MA:TheMITPress.
Consalvo,M.(2009).ThereisNoMagicCircle.GamesandCulture,4(4),408417.
135
Consalvo,M.(2003).HotDatesandfairyTaleRomances:StudyingSexualityinVideoGames.In M.Wolf&B.Perron(Eds.),TheVideoGameTheoryReader.NewYork,NY:Routledge.
Corneliussen,H.G.,&Rettberg,J.W.(2008).DigitalCulture,Play,andIdentity:AWorldof WarcraftReader.Cambridge,MA:TheMITPress.
Corneliussen,H.(2005).IFellInLovewiththeMachine':Women'sPleasureinComputing. JournalofInformation,CommunicationandEthicsinSociety,3(4),233241.
deCastell,S.,Boschman,L.,&Jenson,J.(2009).Inandoutofcontrol:Learninggames differently.Loading...,2(3).
Fiske,J.(1992).TheCulturalEconomyofFandom.InLewis,L.(Ed.),TheAdoringAudience:Fan CultureandPopularMedia.London:Routledge.
Gray,Ann.(2003)ResearchPracticeforCulturalStudies:EthnographicMethodsandLived Cultures.Sage.
Jenson,J.,deCastell,S.,&Fisher,S.(2007).Girlsplayinggames:rethinkingstereotypes.In Proceedingsofthe2007conferenceonFuturePlay,.916.
Jenson,J.,&deCastell,S.(2005).Herownboss:Genderandthepursuitofincompetentplay.In proceedingsoftheInternationalDiGRAconference,Vancouver,Canada.
Juul,J.(2010).ACasualRevolution:ReinventingVideoGamesandTheirPlayers.Cambridge, MA:TheMITPress.
Juul,J.(2005).HalfReal:VideoGamesbetweenRealRulesandFictionalWorlds.Cambridge, MA:TheMITPress.
Kerr,A.(2003).GirlsWomenJustWanttoHaveFun:Astudyofadultfemaleplayersofdigital
137
games.InProceedingsofLevelUp:DigitalGamesResearchConference.Utrecht:Utrecht University.
Kline,S.,DyerWitheford,N.,&DePeuter,G.(2003).Digitalplay:Theinteractionoftechnology, culture,andmarketing.McGillQueensUniversityPress.
Margolis,J.,&Fisher,A.(2002).UnlockingtheClubhouse:WomeninComputing.Cambridge, MA:TheMITPress.
MassachusettsInstituteofTechnology.Enrollments20092010.Retrievedfrom http://web.mit.edu/facts/enrollment.html.
NationalScienceFoundation.(2010)Women,Minorities,andPersonswithDisabilitiesinScience andEngineering.RetrievedApril13,2010fromhttp://www.nsf.gov/statistics/wmpd/.
PewResearchCenter.(2008)TeensVideoGamesandCivics.RetrievedApril14,2010from http://pewresearch.org/pubs/953/teensvideogamesandcivics. PopCapGames.(2010)SocialGamingResearch.InformationSolutionsGroup.RetrievedApril 14,2010from http://www.infosolutionsgroup.com/2010_PopCap_Social_Gaming_Research_Results.pdf Putnam,R.D.(2001).Bowlingalone:ThecollapseandrevivalofAmericancommunity.New York:SimonandSchuster. Remo,C.(2008)NPD:NintendoDominatesMarchSoftware,Hardware.Retrievedfrom http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/18291/NPD_Nintendo_Dominates_March_Softwa re_Hardware.php. Royse,P.,Lee,J.,Undrahbuyan,B.,Hopson,M.,&Consalvo,M.(2007).Womenandgames: technologiesofthegenderedself.NewMedia&Society,9(4),555. Schott,G.R.,&Horrell,K.R.(2000).Girlgamersandtheirrelationshipwiththegamingculture. Convergence,6(4),36.
138
Salen,K.,&Zimmerman,E.(2004).RulesofPlay:GameDesignFundamentals.Cambridge,MA: TheMITPress. Taylor,N.,Jenson,J.,&deCastell,S.(2007).Genderinplay:Mappingagirlsgamingclub.In Situatedplay:Proceedingsofthethirdinternationalconferenceofthedigitalgames researchassociation. Taylor,T.L.(2008a)BecomingaPlayer:Networks,Structures,andImaginedFutures,inKafai, Yasmin,CarrieHeeter,JillDennerandJenniferY.Sun(eds.)BeyondBarbieandMortal Kombat:NewPerspectivesonGenderandGaming.Cambridge,MA:TheMITPress. Taylor,T.L.(2008b)Pushingtheborders:playerparticipationandgameculture.Structuresof ParticipationinDigitalCulture.NewYork:SocialScienceResearchCouncil. Taylor,T.L.(2006).PlayBetweenWorlds:ExploringOnlineGameCulture(annotatededition.). Cambridge,MA:TheMITPress. Thorne,B.(1993).Genderplay:Girlsandboysinschool.NewBrunswick,NJ:RutgersUniversity Press. Thornham,H.(2008).It'sABoyThing.FeministMediaStudies,8(2),127142. Turkle,S.(1997).LifeontheScreen:IdentityintheAgeoftheInternet.NewYork:Simon& Schuster. Turkle,S.(1988).Computationalreticence:Whywomenfeartheintimatemachine.InC. Kramarae(Ed.)Technologyandwomen'svoices:Keepingintouch.Routledge&Kegan Paul. Turkle,S.(1984).Thesecondself:Computersandthehumanspirit.NewYork:Simonand Schuster. Turner,Victor.(1974).Liminalandliminoidinplay,flow,andritual:Anessayincomparative symbology.RiceUniversityStudies60(3):5392. U.S.CensusBureau.20062008AmericanCommunitySurvey3YearEstimates.Retrievedfrom http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/ACSSAFFFacts. Vered,K.O.(1998).Bluegroupboysplayincrediblemachine,girlsplayhopscotch:Social discourseandgenderedplayatthecomputer.InJ.SeftonGreen(Ed.)Digitaldiversions: Youthcultureintheageofmultimedia.Routledge.
139
Voida,A.,&Greenberg,S.(2009).Wiiallplay:Theconsolegameasacomputationalmeeting place.InProceedingsofthe27thinternationalconferenceonHumanfactorsincomputing systems.SanJose. Wajcman,J.(2010).Feministtheoriesoftechnology.CambridgeJournalofEconomics.34,143 152. Wajcman,J.(1991).Feminismconfrontstechnology.UniversityPark,PA:PennsylvaniaState UniversityPress. Walkerdine,V.(2006).PlayingTheGame.FeministMediaStudies,6(4),519537 West,M.(2008)Wooingwomengamersandgamecreators.Retrievedfrom http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/ptech/02/28/women.gamers/index.html. Yee,N.(2006).Motivationsforplayinonlinegames.CyberPsychology&Behavior,9(6),772 775.
140