Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Rock Mass Classification Why? How does this help us in tunnel design?
Ground interaction
Types of failure which occur in rock masses under low and high in-situ stress levels
Engineering Rock Mass Classification Schemes Developed for estimation of tunnel support Used at project feasibility and preliminary design stages Simple check lists or detailed schemes Used to develop a picture of the rock mass and its variability Used to provide initial empirical estimates of tunnel support requirements Are practical engineering tools which force the user to examine the properties of the rock mass Do Not replace detailed design methods Project specific
Marek Caa Dept. of Geomechanics, Civil Engineering & Geotechnics
Terzaghis Rock Mass Classification (1946) Rock Mass Descriptions Intact Stratified Moderately jointed Blocky and Seamy Crushed Squeezing Swelling
Terzaghis Rock Mass Classification (1946) Intact rock contains neither joints nor hair cracks. Hence, if it breaks, it breaks across sound rock. On account of the injury to the rock due to blasting, spalls may drop off the roof several hours or days after blasting. This is known as a spalling condition. Hard, intact rock may also be encountered in the popping condition involving the spontaneous and violent detachment of rock slabs from the sides or roof. Stratified rock consists of individual strata with little or no resistance against separation along the boundaries between the strata. The strata may or may not be weakened by transverse joints. In such rock the spalling condition is quite common. Moderately jointed rock contains joints and hair cracks, but the blocks between joints are locally grown together or so intimately interlocked that vertical walls do not require lateral support. In rocks of this type, both spalling and Marek Caa Dept. of Geomechanics, Civil Engineering & Geotechnics
Rock Quality Designation Index (RQD) (Deere et al. 1967) Aim : to provide a quantitative estimate of rock mass quality from drill logs Equal to the percentage of intact core pieces longer than 100mm in the total length of core
RQD Directionally dependant parameter Intended to indicate rock mass quality in-situ Adapted for surface exposures as Jv number of discontinuities per unit volume Used as a component in the RMR and Q systems Palmstrom (1982)
0.1 Priesta i Hudsona (1976) RQD = 100(1 + 0.1 )e
Multi parameter Rock Mass Classification Schemes Rock Mass Structure Rating (RSR) Rock Mass Rating (RMR) Rock Tunnelling Quality Index (Q) Geological Strength Index (GSI)
Rock Mass Structure Rating (RSR) (1972) Introduced the concept of rating components to arrive at a numerical value Demonstrates the logic in a quasi-quantitative rock mass classification Has limitations as based on small tunnels supported by steel sets only RSR = A + B + C
Considers
(a) rock type origin (b) rock hardness (c) geotechnical structure
Considers
(a) joint spacing (b) joint orientation (strike and dip) (c) direction of tunnel drive
Considers
(a) overall rock mass quality (on the basis of A + B) (b) joint condition (c) water inflow
Geomechanics Classification or Rock Mass Rating System (RMR) (Bieniawski 1976) Based upon uniaxial compressive strength of rock material rock quality designation (RQD) spacing of discontinuities condition of discontinuities groundwater conditions orientation of discontinuities
Rock mass divided into structural regions Each region is classified separately Boundaries can be rock type or structural, eg: fault Can be sub divided based on significant changes, eg: discontinuity spacing
BUT: 1976 to 1989 Bieniawski System refined by greater data Ratings for parameters changed Adapted by other workers for different situations PROJECT SPECIFIC SYSTEMS
Class I II III IV V
Description Very Good Rock Good Rock Fair Rock Poor Rock Very Poor Rock
Guidelines for excavation and support of 10m span rock tunnels in accordance with the RMR system
E m = 2 RMR 100 for RMR > 50 (GPa) E m = 10 ( RMR 10 ) / 40 for RMR < 50 (GPa )
Hoek i Brown (1997)
Em = Rc 10 10 ( RMR 10) / 40
Verman (1993
Rock Mass Rating System Support pressure - Unal (1983) s - tunnel width Hoek (1994):
pv = 100 RMR s 100
m = mi e
RMR 100 28
s=e
RMR 100 9
Rcrm = sRc
Rrrm
Rc = m m2 + 4 s 2
Rc RMR 15 = 2 85
Rock Mass Rating System Aydan & Kawamoto (2000) Lets assume: RMR = 60
Rcrm
Based on case histories in Scandinavia Numerical values on a log scale Range 0.001 to 1000
Q Classification System
Q Classification System
represents the structure of the rockmass crude measure of block or particle size
Q Classification System
Q Classification System
consists of two stress parameters SRF can be regarded as a total stress parameter measure of loosening load as excavated through shear zones rock stress in competent rock squeezing loads in plastic incompetent rock JW is a measure of water pressure
(After Barton et al. 1974)
Q Classification Scheme
Resolves to three parameters Block size Interblock shear strength Active stress ( RQD / Jn ) ( Jr / Ja ) ( Jw / SRF )
Q Classification Scheme
Resolves to three parameters Block size Interblock shear strength Active stress ( RQD / Jn ) ( Jr / Ja ) ( Jw / SRF )
Equivalent Dimension De
Q Classification Scheme
p roof
33
40s 13 = J Q r
E = 10
Rc [MPa] Q 3
RMR Q - Correlations
RMR and Q system or variants are the most widely used both incorporate geological, geometric and design/engineering parameters to obtain a value of rock mass quality empirical and require subjective assessment
Approach: accurately characterise the rockmass ie: full and complete description of the rockmass assign parameters for classification later always use two systems for comparison
Method to link the constants m and s of Hoek-Brown failure criterion to observations in the field ie: a possible solution to the problem of estimating strength of jointed rockmass A system for estimating the reduction in rockmass strength for different geological conditions Overcomes deficiencies of RMR for poor quality rock
Estimation of constants based upon rock mass structure and discontinuity surface conditions
Plots of cohesive strength and friction angles for different GSI and mi values
Klasyfikacja KF