Sei sulla pagina 1di 31

Transmission Electron Microscopy

Part VII: Analytical Electron Microscopy (AEM) EELS & EDXS

Christoph T. Koch
Max Planck Institut fr Metallforschung
Literature:R.F. Edgerton, Electron Energy-Loss Spectroscopy in the Electron Microscope,Plenum, New York (1986, 1996)

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 1

Universitt Stuttgart

Reminder: Electron Scattering in the Sample


Electrons incident on the sample may be deflected and/or transfer part of their energy to the sample.
De tec tor tor tec De

incident electrons

Secondary and back-scattered electrons

Sample

X-rays

(not common in TEM, but standard in SEM)

transmitted electrons

Detection system (Images, Diffraction Patterns, Spectra [representing the energy lost in the sample])
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 2 Universitt Stuttgart

An artists view of electron scattering


Incident electron
Image and animation: Carl Zeiss SMT

photon

Scattered electron
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 3 Universitt Stuttgart

Reminder: Inelastic Scattering


Electrons may lose energy by Exciting vibrational states (phonons) in the sample (E < 0.2eV) Exciting density fluctuations of electrons in the valence band (surfaceand bulk plasmons) (5 eV < E < 50 eV) Exciting bound electrons into an unoccupied orbital (LUMO or higher) Inter- and Intra band transitions Producing Bremsstrahlung Electron electron (Compton) scattering

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 4

Universitt Stuttgart

Separating Electrons by Energy


Focal plane of projector lens system Slower electrons experience a stronger deflection by the magnetic field. The momentum p of the electron may then be determined from the radius of curvature a:

e r p = B a, c

p2 E = 2m

Slow electrons of energy E2 < E1

Magnetic Prism

B X

Energy Dispersive Plane

Fast electrons of energy E1


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 5 Universitt Stuttgart

The Electron Energy Loss Spectrum


Zero-loss peak (ZLP) Counts (arbitrary units) Core-loss spectrum (e.g. Carbon K-edge)

Volume plasmon peak (most likely energy loss in whole spectrum)

Energy loss in eV ELNES: electron energy near edge structure EXELFS: Extended energy loss fine structure
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 6 Universitt Stuttgart

Origin of EELS Core-Loss Features


unoccupied Conduction/ Valence band Inner orbitals

Neighbor atoms

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Counts N

Page: 7

Universitt Stuttgart

Naming Convention for Atomic Orbitals (Electron Shells)


Electronic excitations visible in unoccupied the energy loss spectrum are states named after the shell from which an electron was excited.
M 4,5 M 2,3 M1 L2,3 L1 K O 2,3 O1 N 6,7 N 4,5

N 2,3 N1

j
1s K-shell 2s 2p L-shell 3s 3p 3d M-shell 4s 4p 4d N -shell 4f 5s

Energy

5p 5d O -shell

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 8

Universitt Stuttgart

Example: EEL Spectrum of Boron Nitride

EEL spectrum of Boron Nitride


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 9 Universitt Stuttgart

Inelastic Scattering Geometry


Ewald sphere radius: k0 Beam energy: E0

k0 Sample

E0 =

p2 = 2m 2m

r 2 h 2 k0

Elastically scattered electron

Ewald spheres for Inelastically elastically/inelastically scattered scattered electrons. r r r electron q = k ' k k

r q r q r || q
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 10

r r r q = q|| + q r r r r q k0 , q|| E k0 r2 r 2 2 q k 0 2 + E

E = E / (m0v 2 )

Universitt Stuttgart

Angular Dependence of Inelastic Scattering


Characteristic Angle:

E = E / 2 E0

( E = average energy loss, typically 37eV)

Differential cross section for inelastic scattering:

1 d 4 2 Z = 2 4 2 d a0 k 0 + E2

04 1 + 2 2 2 + E + 0

0 , for < E 2 , for E < < 0 2 4 , for < 0

Compare: Elastic Rutherford scattering cross section is proportional Z2! a0: Bohr radius (=0.529) : relativistic correction factor : scattering angle 0: effective cutoff angle E: characteristic angle

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 11

Universitt Stuttgart

Bethe Theory and Dipole Approximation


Scattering cross section for an electron from the initial state |i> into a state |n> :

r r d n 4 2 k ' n exp(iq rj ) i = 2 4 d a0 q k0 j

4 2 k ' r r r 3 * = k f (r ) exp(iq rj )i (r )d r a2q4 j 0 0 r r r r Dipole approximation: exp(iq rj ) = 1 + iq r ...


r r n exp(iq r ) i
2

|n>: |i>: q: rj:

Target electron orbital Initial electron orbital Scattering vector Atom positions

(for orbitals close to the core only the local atom at r=0 must be considered)
2 2 r r r r = n 1 i + i n q r i ... = i n q r i ...

Vanishes, because |i> and |n> are orthogonal

Non-zero only for pairs of states |i> and |n> whose symmetry is different, i.e. whose angular momentum changes.

Dipole Selection Rule: Change in angular momentum l = +/-1


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 12 Universitt Stuttgart

Physical Significance of Matrix Element


r r r M (q , E ) = n exp(iq r ) i

r r i n q r i

The matrix element determines the basic edge shape. ELNES and EXELFS oscillations modify this shape. Computation of the basic edge shapes only requires isolated atoms.
Basic Edge Edge

1. Basic edge for isolated atom


Background

2. Spectrum containing background (e.g. from other edges)

3. Modulation by fine structure

4. Modulation by far-edge-fine structure


Page: 13 Universitt Stuttgart

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Energy Loss Near Edge Structure (ELNES)


ELNES provides information about local band structure, oxidation states and bonding. Its computation requires therefore (time consuming) band structure computations or equivalent methods in real space. The ELNES Signal may be interpreted as the local symmetryprojecteddensity of states in the conduction band Core-hole effect: The electron that has been excited into one of the unoccupied atomic orbitals leaves behind a hole, producing a shift on all the other orbitals, including the one it is jumping to. This affects the ELNES. One can often distinguish local bonding characteristics by Fingerprinting, i.e. by comparing with spectra of the same element in known local environments.

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 14

Universitt Stuttgart

EXtended Energy-Loss Fine Structure (EXELFS)


If a core-shell electron is excited enough to leave the potential of ist local atom it travels through the sample as a spherical wave. The inteference of this outgoing wave with the ones reflected by neighboring atoms affects the ionization probability, modulating the ionization edge structure (see also X-ray technique EXAFS). EXELFS carries information about the coordination of an atomic species in a material. It starts at energies >Ec+50 eV (Ec = edge energy) It may be overlaid by multiple scattering effects (e.g. Ec + plasmon loss) => Single scattering correction (deconvolution with low-loss EEL spectrum) is necessary. Radial distribution function (RDF) may be obtained from EXELFS.

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 15

Universitt Stuttgart

Low-Loss EELS
Mainly Plasmons (longitudinal density fluctuations in a plasma, here: the electrons in the valence band) Also Intra- and Interband transitions (as opposed to ionization edges, which catapult electrons into the conduction band or outside the local atoms potential). Energy loss range comparable with the range accessible to V-UV spectroscopy. Information about (local) dielectric properties of the material: Determination of dielectric function with high spatial resolution

= r + i i = 1 + i 2

Excitation / annihilation of atomic vibrations (phonons): Energy losses << 1eV.

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 16

Universitt Stuttgart

Dielectric Formulation of Energy Loss


The dielectric formulation of energy losses considers a continuum of varying (complex) dielectric constant, instead of individual atomic orbitals. Double differential cross section ( )

Kramers Kronig Relation relates real and imaginary part of the dielectric function. The full complex =1+i2 can therefore be obtained from a single EEL spectrum (E = h )

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 17

Universitt Stuttgart

Models of the Dielectric Function


Drude Model: Valid for Metals and Semiconductors. Assumes the existence of a single plasmon resonance frequency p and a damping coefficient (small for metals). p depends on the valence electron density ne and the effective electron mass m.

Lorentz Model: Assumes an ensemble of many different harmonic oscillators representing possible interband transitions with energies equal to the oscillators eigenfrequency n. Commonly only one such harmonic oscillator is assumed:

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 18

Universitt Stuttgart

Multiple Inelastic Scattering


Single scattering spectrum (as measured):

J 1 ( E ) = R( E ) S( E) = R( E E' ) S( E' )dE'

Instrumental broadening (point spread function)

Actual energy loss function of sample

Double scattered spectrum (as detected):

J 2 (E) =

1 R( E ) S ( E ) S ( E ) 2I 0

Fourier transform of spectrum containing all multiple scattering orders:

j ( ) = J ( E )e 2i E dE
s( ) [s( )]2 s ( )/ I j ( ) = z ( ) 1 + + + ... = z( )e I0 2I 2
0

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

(I0 = total current in spectrum, z():FT of zero-loss peak shape)


Page: 19

Universitt Stuttgart

Fourier-Log Deconvolution
If the whole spectrum starting at E=0 is available (possible for low energy losses):

j( ) s( ) = I0 ln z( )
OK

Ni K

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 20

Universitt Stuttgart

10

Fourier-Ratio Method
One can approximate the multiple scattering at higher energy losses as a convolution of the actual spectrum with its low-loss range (since low energy losses (e.g. plasmons) have a much higher scattering cross section). The single scattering energy loss function can then be obtained by deconvolution, using an iterative algorithm (such as Maximum Likelihood, Richardson-Lucy, etc.) or straight division in Fourier-space.

k ( ) = I0
1

jK ( ) jl ( )

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 21

Universitt Stuttgart

Thickness Determination by EELS


At sufficiently high specimen thickness, several inelastic scattering events may occur. The EELS intensity is then given by an exponential in reciprocal space

t / = ln(I total / I ZLP )


Itotal
1 + E0 / 1022 E0

IZLP
106
Inelastic Mean Free Path:

(1 + E0 / 511)2 Em ln[2 E0 / Em ]

(E0 in keV, =collection angle)

0.36 Mean energy loss (in eV): Em 7.6 Z

is typically 50 150 nm
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 22 Universitt Stuttgart

11

Delocalization of Inelastic Scattering


At higher Energy losses E becomes larger (E ~ E). For high energy losses the spatial resolution is therefore determined by the size of the spectrometer collection aperture (uncertainty principle). At low energy losses, qE determines a lower cut-off angle below which the scattering cross section is reduced. It therefore needs to be considered in addition to the aperture size. Generally the resolution of inelastic scattering may be approximated by the a disk of diameter d50 from which 50% of the inelastic signal stem:

(d50 )2 = (0.5 / E 3 / 4 ) + (0.6 / )2


2

Limits low-loss resolution


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Raileigh criterion for collection aperture


Page: 23 Universitt Stuttgart

Delocalization of Inelastic Scattering


Data: Lin Gu, MPI-MF Microscope: Zeiss Libra 200FE+MC
Spatial-resolution of inelastic scattering (neglecting aberrations) using an AlGaN edge (effective CCD pixel size: 2). d50 experimental reflects an average value with energy-slit of about 2eV.
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 24 Universitt Stuttgart

12

Separating Electrons by Energy


Focal plane of projector lens system Slower electrons experience a stronger deflection by the magnetic field. The momentum p of the electron may then be determined from the radius of curvature a:

e r p = B a, c

p2 E = 2m

Slow electrons of energy E2 < E1

Magnetic Prism

B X

Energy Dispersive Plane

Fast electrons of energy E1


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 25 Universitt Stuttgart

Imaging Energy Filters


Intermediate Diffraction Pattern

Intermediate Image Imaging Energy Filter An optical element (i.e. may have some magnification) which replicates the image in O1 in O3, but electrons of different energy cross the image plane O3 at different angles of incidence. Achromatic image D: diffraction plane O: image plane S: sextupole lens

Energy dispersed diffraction pattern

Energy-selecting slit aperture


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 26 Universitt Stuttgart

13

Energy Filter Aberrations


Diffraction pattern Imaging energy filter aberrations Reduce spectral resolution (by convoluting diffraction pattern or image with the spectrum) Reduce the area that can be imaged (depends on width of energy-selecting slit). Energy varies across diffr. pattern (non-isochromatic)

Image

Energy Dispersive Plane (Spectrum x Image)

Magnetic Prism

B X

Energy-slit
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 27 Universitt Stuttgart

Energy-filtered Electron Diffraction

Energy-filtered CBED pattern (Slit width: 10eV)

Energy variation for CBED pattern (Energy loss: 0eV [red] .. 10eV [blue])

(M.M.G. Barfels, M. Kundmann, C. Trevor, J.A. Hunt, Microsc Microanal 11(Suppl 2), 2005) Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 28 Universitt Stuttgart

14

Correcting Imaging Energy Filter Aberrations

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 29

Universitt Stuttgart

Actual Design of a Post-Column Filter

Gatan Imaging Filter (GIF): mounted below the column


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 30 Universitt Stuttgart

Diagram: G. Botton

15

In-Column (Omega) Filter

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 31

Universitt Stuttgart

Evolution of In-Column Filter Designs

23eV
12nm2 1eV, 80kV

15eV
9nm2 1eV, 200kV

0.5eV
190nm2 1eV, 200kV

0.007eV
11000nm2 1eV, 200kV

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 32

Universitt Stuttgart

Image and animation: Carl Zeiss SMT

16

In-Column vs. Post-Column


In-Column (Omega) Filter
4 Dispersive elements (4x90) Integrated into microscope column Electron Optics designed to optimize filter performance Spectra and images projected on viewing screen, CCD, photographic film, TV-camera

Post-Column Filter
1 dispersive element (90) May be added to any existing microscope Filter- and microscope optics separately controlled Only detectors integrated into energy filter possible (no film, no viewing screen)

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 33

Universitt Stuttgart

Energy-Filtered TEM (EFTEM)


In EFTEM mode, the energy filter is used to record images formed by electrons that have experienced different energy losses.

The energy window is shifted by changing the accelerating voltage of the microscope. This ensures that the TEM optics may remain unchanged.
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Slit aperture C1 .. C7: correction elements


Page: 34 Universitt Stuttgart

17

Electron Spectroscopic Imaging (ESI)


Energy-filtered images may also be acquired sequentially by scanning the beam across the specimen and recording a spectrum at every beam position (STEM-EELS).

Adding an energy dimension to an image makes it a 3D data cube


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 35 Universitt Stuttgart

STEM-EELS Maps and Linescans


STEM-EELS: Provides a whole spectrum (e.g.1000 .. 4000 energy channels) for each beam position along the scan line (or scanned area) Spatial resolution is determined by the electron beam probe size. Composition Profile

Ti : O ratio

SrTiO3 ceramic
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung in nm Page: 36 Universitt Stuttgart

18

EFTEM vs. STEM-EELS


EFTEM
Acquisition time independent of number of pixels Parallel acquisition ensures zero drift between pixels Energy may have shifted between images Slit cuts away electrons -> inefficient.

STEM-EELS
Acquisition time grows linear with number of pixels Specimen may have drifted between pixels All energy channels acquired simultaneously no energy drift All electrons are used -> very efficient use of electrons

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 37

Universitt Stuttgart

Ionization Edges: Background Subtraction


Fit background Ionization edge Background subtracted Ionization edge Extrapolated background

Background extrapolation: usually power law IBackground(E) = AE-r (Generally, the background model depends on energy loss)
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 38 Universitt Stuttgart

19

EFTEM: 3 Window method

Images: J. Verbeeck

Background extrapolation: usually power law IBackground(E) = AE-r


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 39 Universitt Stuttgart

Background subtraction in 3-Window Elemental Mapping

E1..E3: energies at edge of energy slit


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 40 Universitt Stuttgart

20

Plasmon Energy Map


100 nm 23 eV 22 eV

SiC

Si3N4

Image: A. Zern, W. Sigle Map of Plasmon energies in a Si3N4 / SiC ceramic determined by fitting the position of the plasmon peak energy to an EFTEM series. The different plasmon energies stem from different valence electron densities in these materials. The shift in plasmon energy from left to right is due to an non-isochromaticity of 0.5eV.

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 41

Universitt Stuttgart

Zero-Loss Filtering in Electron Diffraction


Convergent beam electron diffraction (CBED) patterns become much clearer, if the diffuse inelastic scattering background has been removed by zero-loss energy filtering.

Unfiltered CBED pattern

Zero-loss filtered CBED pattern Image G. Botton

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 42

Universitt Stuttgart

21

EELS at interfaces
Sequentially acquired EELS Linescan across an interface in Si3N4

position

Energy-loss

intensity

Energy-loss
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 43 Universitt Stuttgart

Electron Spectroscopic Profiling (ELSP)


Single focusing spectrometers focus spatial information into a line normal to the dispersive direction. E=0 GaAs

AlGaAs

interface
Po int sitio er n a fac c e ros s

Less beam damage Better Signal/Noise energy

50nm

Energy

in eV
Page: 44 Universitt Stuttgart

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

22

Electron Spectroscopic Profiling (ELSP)


Concentration profiles across an interface from a single exposure!

(La,Ca)MnO3/SrTiO3 3.9A resolution


T. Walther, Ultramicr. 96, 401 (2003) Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 45 Universitt Stuttgart

EELS at Interfaces
Spatial Difference Technique b IGrain(E) a IGB(E)

Spectrum incl. interface = aSpectrum of interface + bSpectrum of bulk a+b=1 each spectrum > 0 at all energies
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 46 Universitt Stuttgart

23

Momentum-Resolved EELS
Zero Loss Peak (ZLP
3.3eV band edge

interband transitions

volume plasmon

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

5eV 50rad
Page: 47 Universitt Stuttgart

Increasing Energy Resolution: Monochromators

(has residual dispersion)

(has residual dispersion)


Page: 48

(dispersion free)
Universitt Stuttgart

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

24

After Excitation: Relaxation => Characteristic X-rays

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 49

Universitt Stuttgart

Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDXS)


While EELS probes energy levels of available empty atomic orbitals into which electrons may be excited (relative to the electrons initial orbital), EDXS probes the energy levels of filled orbitals from which electrons may relax to replace the excited electron. inc. electron

Vacuum

X-ray -

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 50

Universitt Stuttgart

25

EDXS: Sensitive to Heavy Elements


X-ray emission as function of element (approx.):

1 101 102 103 104 10 20

Z4 a+Z4

30

40

50

Z: nuclear charge; a: constant (e.g. a 106 for K-lines)


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 51 Universitt Stuttgart

Si(Li) - Detector

-500 .. -1000V

Energy-loss of for creating one electron-hole pair: 3.8 eV @ T = 77 K => Number of electron-hole pairs proportional to photon-energy (up to a few keV) charge pulse only 10-16 C (->amplification and computer processing)
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 52 Universitt Stuttgart

3 mm

Detector cooled by liquid N2

Si, Li drifted (insulating) Alternative: Ge

26

Efficiency of Different EDX Detector Designs


1,0 0,8 0,6 0,4 0,2 0,0 0,0 1,0 2,0 E [keV] 3,0 4,0 fensterlos No window Polymer-UTW Polymeric ultra-thin window atmosph. UTW thin window (BN, diamond, ) Atmospheric Be Beryllium window

Efficiency

Cooling the detector is necessary, to a) keep the Li in place and b) reduce noise (e.g. thermally activated electron-hole pairs) Thin windows, transparent to (almost all) X-rays, protect the detector.
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 53 Universitt Stuttgart

EDX Detector
e- beam Liquid N2-filled dewar cools the detector

window Tilted sample holder with notch


Diagram: G. Botton

collimator

Objective lens

Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung

Page: 54

Universitt Stuttgart

27

EDX detector
Cryostat Detector Window FET Detector Shutter FET

Cooling Collimator

liq. N2

window

Diagram: Oxford Instruments


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 55 Universitt Stuttgart

The Collimator

Diagram: Oxford Instruments Example: EDX detector in a SEM


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 56 Universitt Stuttgart

28

The EDX Spectrum


Characteristic X-ray peaks

Continuous background (Bremsstrahlung)


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 57 Universitt Stuttgart

EDX mapping of grain junction


BF image

Grain junction in Si3N4 Experiment: Z. Zhang


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 58 Universitt Stuttgart

29

The Inelastic Interaction Volume


Because of the low specimen thickness the interaction volume in a TEM is much smaller than in SEM. This reduces the count rate, but makes excellent spatial resolution possible.

SEM

AEM

Interaction volume ~10-5m3 Diagrams: Oxford Instruments


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 59 Universitt Stuttgart

~10-8m3

Beam Broadening

Diagram: Oxford Instruments


Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 60 Universitt Stuttgart

30

Spatial Resolution Limit: Specimen Drift


High spatial resolution in EDXS Mapping requires thin specimen and, because of the low count rates, very long exposure times. It then depends on the specimen drift (and the effectiveness of methods compensating it) whether non-blurred EDXS maps can be recorded.

ADF-STEM image

EDX Ru-map

A 4 thick Ruthenium layer may clearly be resolved by EDXS in a Cs-corrected TEM Images: T. Yaguchi et al., IMC16 Sapporo, Japan (2006)
Max-Planck Institut fr Metallforschung Page: 61 Universitt Stuttgart

31

Potrebbero piacerti anche