0 valutazioniIl 0% ha trovato utile questo documento (0 voti)
98 visualizzazioni7 pagine
The occupy movement are not anarchists. Rioters and protestors of the modern left are not anarchists. Such people have allowed themselves to become dependent on government, they could no more live without the sheltering authority than a tree could live without water.
Real anarchy is a well thought out political philosophy though like most (all) political philosophies it looks good on paper but in it pure form is hopelessly impractical. It might be fine for The Sex Pistols to sing about Anarchy In The UK but since religious communes like the Levellers and the Diggers were suppressed the nearest there has been to anarchy is the classical liberal philosophy of The Liberal Party.
Study the history of The Liberals under Gladstone, Asquith and Lloyd George and there is a visible commitment to personal liberty and minimal government interference. How different to those who call themselves 'liberal' today but love regulation and laws restricting personal freedom.
The occupy movement are not anarchists. Rioters and protestors of the modern left are not anarchists. Such people have allowed themselves to become dependent on government, they could no more live without the sheltering authority than a tree could live without water.
Real anarchy is a well thought out political philosophy though like most (all) political philosophies it looks good on paper but in it pure form is hopelessly impractical. It might be fine for The Sex Pistols to sing about Anarchy In The UK but since religious communes like the Levellers and the Diggers were suppressed the nearest there has been to anarchy is the classical liberal philosophy of The Liberal Party.
Study the history of The Liberals under Gladstone, Asquith and Lloyd George and there is a visible commitment to personal liberty and minimal government interference. How different to those who call themselves 'liberal' today but love regulation and laws restricting personal freedom.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
The occupy movement are not anarchists. Rioters and protestors of the modern left are not anarchists. Such people have allowed themselves to become dependent on government, they could no more live without the sheltering authority than a tree could live without water.
Real anarchy is a well thought out political philosophy though like most (all) political philosophies it looks good on paper but in it pure form is hopelessly impractical. It might be fine for The Sex Pistols to sing about Anarchy In The UK but since religious communes like the Levellers and the Diggers were suppressed the nearest there has been to anarchy is the classical liberal philosophy of The Liberal Party.
Study the history of The Liberals under Gladstone, Asquith and Lloyd George and there is a visible commitment to personal liberty and minimal government interference. How different to those who call themselves 'liberal' today but love regulation and laws restricting personal freedom.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Formati disponibili
Scarica in formato PDF, TXT o leggi online su Scribd
mch misnders!ood "oli!ical "hiloso"hy# By Ian R Thorpe An outbreak of rioting, violence and looting in Britain's inner city communities in August 20 !as described by the media as anarchy" But to dismiss !hat !as simple criminality as anarchy disrespects a !ell thought our political philosophy" In the real !orld anarchism !ould be un!orkable as a system of government but the ideas it offers us are a po!erful antidote to the control freakery of the political and corporate establishment" The term anarchism !hich describes a social system based on anarchy, !ithout formal and hierarchic government #no monarchs, oligarchs etc"""$ is derived from t!o %reek !ords, an archos !hich together mean &!ithout a chief or head"& Anarchism !as one of the most radical and influential political philosophies to develop in 'urope during the (th century" The defining ideal of anarchism is that government should be abolished in order to allo! human communities to flourish in a state of anarchy, !ithout the constraint of authoritarian oversight" Another belief of anarchist is that the people should be allo!ed to live in free associations, sharing !ork and its products" Although the practical beginnings of anarchy as a political movement came in the (th century, anarchism has theoretical roots in the !ritings of t!o 'nglish social reformers of the period kno! as &The Age )f Reason" These !ere %errard *instanley and *illiam %od!in" *instanley !as a +th, century agricultural reformer !ho believed that land should be divided among all the people" At the time the opposite !as happening- as a result of the enclosures acts peasant farmers !ere being deprived of the common land on !hish their sheep, goats and pigs cattle had gra.ed and foraged for centuries #The other slaves$ The other,%od!in, in a book entitled 'An 'n/uiry 0oncerning 1olitical 2ustice' #+(3$, argued that authority is unnatural and that social evils arise and e4ist because people are not free to live their lives according to the dictates of reason" 5e might have been disappointed had this been put into practice because not only !ere the ma6ority of poor people uneducated and thus dependent on those in authority, the priest, the 7ord of the 8anor's or his baliff or foreman and the village elders, to do their reasoning for them" But it !as a good idea on paper" The term anarchism !as coined by 9rench political !riter 1ierre,2oseph 1roudhon !ho laid the theoretical foundations of a political movement" 1roudhon's ideas !ere in many !ays similar to socialism, though not to 8ar4ism in that it did not put the all po!erful state at the top of a many layered bureaucratic hierarchy" 1roudhon urged that in place of the unrestricted rights of o!ners of private property, the people should control the means of production that they use" Instead of government 1roudhon desired a federal system of agricultural and industrial cooperatives" Johnny Rotten: Face of anarchy in the punk era. 1roudhon's theories attracted a lot of follo!ers in an era !hen intellectuals !ere /uestioning the old, hierarchic social orders !ith their rigidly stratified class structures" Among the most influential although fe! are !idely kno!n no!, !ere the Russian radicals 8ikhail Bakunin and 1eter :ropotkin, 'mma %oldman- 9renchman %eorges ;orel- and the American 1aul %oodman" These individuals all elaborated theories of anarchism based on 1roudhon's !ork" As !ith all broad political philosophies there evolved many different tendencies covered by the umbrella term anarchism" ;ome even interpreted it as a call to establish a Trotskyist system and as Trotsky called for permanent revolution and advocated achieving this aim through terrorism the term anarchist has become associated !ith la!lessness and violent insurrection" Any group of protestors !ho resort to destruction of property, looting and terrorising the population are /uickly dismissed as Anarchists by the dark forces of authoritarianism !hen in fact they are 6ust criminals" *hile some more level headed supporters of anarchism claim that out of such a breakdo!n of social order a ne! order !ould emerge others, !ith more 6ustification, fear !idespread disorder and la!lessness could only lead to the imposition of repressive la!s and heavy handed policing by an authoritarian government" Though Trotsky sho!ed valid insight into the nature of human societies !hen he spoke of every revolution being ultimately betrayed because as soon as the accede to government the revolutionaries become the ne! establishment, clearly the system he advocated !ould be un!orkable and have catastrophic conse/uences for any society that adopted it" Beyond The Tunderdome: Anachy and dystopia are not the same. ;ome elements continue to insist ho!ever that the only means to change society is through terrorism" This type of political campaigning, kno!n as &propaganda by the deed,& appeals mainly to the young or the obsessively insane, the fanatics" It has led to a number of high profile political assassinations over the years" 8ore reasonable thinkers including ;orel and %oodman, tried to combine the goals of anarchism !ith those of trade unions in an ideology dubbed anarcho,syndicalism, or revolutionary syndicalism" The main tool of this movement !as the general strike, by !hich anarcho,syndicalists hoped to achieve their goal of abolishing capitalism and the state and of establishing organi.ed !orker production units" 'conomic and social change brought about by the Industrial Revolution led to an e4plosion of political theories such as anarchism, communism, and socialism, as !ell as to modern liberalism #not the crypto liberalism of the politically correct left but the traditional liberalism that flourished in the late nineteenth and early t!entieth centuries" The three main movements of the political left !ere at first united by their basic desire to overthro! the e4isting political order" the anarchists ho!ever soon split from the others !hen it became clear the communists and socialists of the 7abour movement !ere moving to!ards replacing the old all , po!erful elites !ith an all , po!erful central state" *hile the communists and socialists !ished to take control of the state and through that control impose their ideas, the anarchists !ished to abolish the state altogether" Anarchism continued as a mass movement until the end of *orld *ar II" It !as especially strong in ;pain, !here anarchists played an active role in the ;panish 0ivil *ar" The movement declined because after of the success of communist in the Russian Revolution it and the victory of the hard line authoritarian Bolsheviks in the !ake of the old system's collapse it /uickly became clear !hat kind of oppressive, tyrannical regime the revolutionaries !ould replace the old order !ith and also because of the suppression of anarchists by 9ascist governments in Italy in the (20s and George Melly: Anarchy became the philosophy of louche bohemians. %ermany in the (30s" In 'urope's other great industrial nations, Britain and 9rance, and in the <;A, support for anarchistic movements !as eroded as liberal governments undertook massive social reform programmes to improve the lives of the great mass of industrial !orkers" Although there !as a revival of anarchism during the civil rights and anti!ar movements of the (=0s and (>0s, anarchism persists primarily as an ideal, a !arning against the dangers of concentrating po!er in the hands of governmental or economic institutions" Though myself sympathetic to the ideals of non violent anarchists, small government, minimalist la!s and a system that allo!s as much personal freedom as possible on the understanding that those !ho step over the boundaries of !hat is acceptable to the group must face appropriate conse/uences I have al!ays accepted that a nation could not function !ith .ero ta4es and no government at all" There are certain functions that can only be provided by government, certain aspects of individual or group behaviour to !hich the !ill of the ma6ority must apply" And there must be an authorised #by the !ill of the ma6ority$ body to enforce such la!s as their are and to administer 6ustice" 8ob rule is not a fit system for either policing or 6ustice and !e must all shoulder our hare of the responsibility for protecting the !eak from e4ploitation by the strong" R'7AT'? 1);T;@ The Intellectual 'lite Truly ?espise 1eople They 1retend To 0are About 8odern left !ing intellectuals publicly indulge in !ailing and gnashing of teeth about poverty, ine/uality and the plight of the poor" Ironically !hen the left is in po!er the poor seem to get poorer and are hardest hot by ta4es aimed at redistributing !ealth !hile the !ealthy elite become fore firmly embedded in positions of po!er" Read about ho! this happens, !hy the intellectuals find it serves their interests to keep the poor do!n and the ignorant in darkness" 9light 9rom 9reedom 9leeing from freedom seems like a contradiction, after all !e usually associciate flight !ith escaping from captivity" In this first part of '4istentialism for Beginners ho!ever the author identifies a human instinct that predisposes us to seek illusory safety by conforming and being part of the cro!d rather than embarking on the lonely life of the free thinker, the person !ho truly makes their o!n decisions and follo!s their o!n path" Auantum ;oul@ Is 'ach )f <s A 1art )f The <niverse Religious and secular philosophers have argued for centuries about life beyond death, the nature of the human soul and our relationship !ith %od, the universe or !hatever" 8odern militant secularists have tried to claim !e are nothing more than machines, others say life is a chemical accident but e4perience tells most people there is much more to our e4istence than that BThe Agenda@ 5o! An International 'lite Are ?estroying ;overeign Cations There is a lot of talk about 'The Ce! *orld )rder' mostly tongue in chek on this site !e must say" But that does not mean there is nothing to be concerned about in the emergence of a global elite and their agenda for establishing a !orld government !ith integrated finance, energy, industrial and agricultural policies and global la! and ta4es B 9reedom )f ;peechD ;o T!entieth 0entury 9or The 7eftist Ca.is Threats to free speech and other civil rights us ordinary punters fought and she blood for are under threat, not from the e4treme right but from the liberal left" The intellectually bankrupt lefties have realised their hundred vyear old arguments are never going to !in the battle for hearts and minds and so have moved to the position in the political spectrum once occupied by 5itler and ;talin" ;hakespeare's 1roud 7oner and The *isdom )f 0ro!ds Internet billionaires and trendy, fad follo!ing media pundits like to talk of the !isdom of cro!ds suggesting a mob can produce a better, more intelligent result that a small team of specialists" If !e look at a fe! e4amples of the !isdom of cro!ds ho!ever !e soon find things are not !hat they seen to be" ?r" 1angloss ;aid All Is 9or The Best 'ver been irritated all those e4hortations to &look on the bright side&and &be positive& 9elt let do!n by hopey,changey stuff and people !ho say &lets 6oin hands and sing :umbaya to create utopia& but fail to deliver" This article might be 6ust !hat you need to readEFspanGEFAGEBG The ;cientific ?ictatorship 1resident 'isenho!er !arned against the dictatorship of a scientific elite in his fare!ell address in (>0" Authors like 5 % *ells and philosophers such as Bertrand Russell !ere predicting such a system if totalitarian global government !as inevitable to maintain human progress late in the nineteenth century" And no! those !ith 'eyes to see and ears to hear' #as the Biblical phrase goes$ can observe politicians in collaboration !ith the academic community and a cartel of big banks and corporations are moving the !orld in that direction" I !ill cover !hat !e can do to resist the loss of our freedom in a future article, for no! learn ho! the scientific dictatorship #Ce! *orld )rder, Illuminati, call them !hat you !ill$ operate" 'ugenics Belongs To The 7eft, Cot The Right 9eeling ;orry 9or 7abour ;upporters After 'aling 0omedy 1arty 1olitical Broadcast , There's A 9irst Anarchism@ *hat it really means by 'mma %oldman Anarchism , %eorge *oodcock #from the 'ncyclopedia of 1hilosophy, (>+$ *hat Is A 7iberal The *ar Bet!een ;cience and Religion 1opulist Authoritarianism 1avlov's 0at The )r!ellian 1arado4