Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Learning Objectives: Learning Objectives: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Examine a nasal defect to determine its true dimension and outline and plan the appropriate timing of reconstruction. 2. Develop a surgical plan to restore normal dimension, volume, symmetry, and outline. 3. Determine the need for local versus regional flap repair. 4. Understand and apply aesthetic principles of nasal reconstruction. 5. Use exact surgical templates to determine the position, dimension, and outline transferred tissues. 6. Distinguish the indications for a two- or three-stage forehead flap. 7. Use the modified folded forehead flap technique with primary and delayed primary support replacement. 8. Understand an approach to the late revision. Summary: This article and accompanying video discuss a step-by-step approach to the reconstruction of a full-thickness heminasal defect in a demanding attractive woman who developed necrosis after cosmetic rejuvenation of the nasolabial fold by filler injection. Aesthetic principles were applied to develop a surgical plan to define the timing of reconstruction and true defect for repair with a full-thickness folded forehead flap transferred in three stages using a modified folded forehead flap for lining and primary and delayed primary support with a late revision to further refine nasal landmarks. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 131: 613e, 2013.)
h, my God! was likely the response of patient and surgeon after nasal pain and discoloration followed the bilateral injection of an hyaluronic acid filler into this healthy womans nasolabial folds for cosmetic rejuvenation. She had no history of nasal injury or operation. Tissue demarcation and spontaneous slough followed (Fig. 1). The wound healed secondarily over weeks. The presumed mechanism of injury was direct arterial injection of the right facial artery causing tissue necrosis. On presentation, the wound was immature. Nasal tip skin and the hairless triangle of the upper lip and adjacent cheek were scarred. The fullthickness of the right ala and inferior sidewall were missing. Centripetal scar contracture pulled the nose to the right, deprojected the tip, and narrowed the airway. No brow vessels were assessable with Doppler evaluation. Presumably, the anastomotic arcade of vessels that supply the supratrochlear and supraorbital vessels bilaterally had been occluded without extension into the orbit, risking blindness (Fig. 2).
AN APPROACH TO RECONSTRUCTION
Cause and Timing of Repair Nasal deformity or injury may follow congenital maldevelopment, cancer treatment, immune disease, or trauma, including vascular injury. In each case, the surgeon must ensure that the wound is healthy and well vascularized; that contamination and infection are controlled; that the extent of tissue injury or disease is identified (tissue demarcation, clear cancer margins); and that edema, tissue tension, and scar contraction are stable. Although the exposure of vital structures may motivate early coverage, a careful evaluation of the patients overall health and goals and the status of
Disclosure: The author has no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article.
From private practice. Received for publication January 23, 2012; accepted March 13, 2012. Copyright 2013 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182827bb3
Related Video content is available for this article. The videos can be found under the Related Videos section of the full-text article, or, for Ovid users, using the URL citations published in the article.
www.PRSJournal.com
613e
Fig. 1. The injection of an hyaluronic acid filler into the bilateral nasolabial folds for cosmetic rejuvenation led to significant nasal necrosis.
Fig. 2. After spontaneous separation and secondary healing, the right ala is absent and the alar base, lip, and cheek are scarred. Centripetal scar contraction pulls the tip to the right. The airway is stenotic.
614e
Video 1. Supplemental Digital Content 1, which shows analysis, planning, and preparation of the defect, is available in the Related Videos section of the full-text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, at http://links.lww.com/PRS/A689.
Video 2. Supplemental Digital Content 2, which demonstrates the forehead flap transfer, is available in the Related Videos section of the full-text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, at http://links.lww.com/PRS/A690.
615e
THE REPAIR
A three-stage full-thickness forehead flap3 (with an extension to supply missing lining) and septal and ear support grafts are planned. No local anesthesia will be injected into the transferred tissues or the recipient site. All stages are performed under general anesthesia to avoid the
Fig. 3. Forehead flap transfer. The nasal and lip landmarks are outlined in ink. Quarterinch paper tape is placed over the nasal surface to create paper patterns and then foil templates of the left contralateral ala, hemitip, and hemilip subunits. The hemitip subunit would be doubled to form a complete tip subunit and then combined with the left ala subunit to create an exact pattern of the missing tip and right ala defect in dimension and border outline. The left hemilip pattern is transposed to the right lip to identify the location of the ideal right nasal base.
616e
Fig. 4. Foil templates of the left contralateral ala, hemitip, and hemilip subunits.
Fig. 5. Scar and residual normal skin is excised to recreate the defect and return tissues to their normal position. Skin within the tip subunit was discarded. A septal cartilage graft has been positioned and sutured between the advanced medial crura to improve tip projection.
617e
Fig. 6. A right vertical paramedian forehead flap, with a distal extension to supply missing lining, was designed, based on exact templates of the contralateral normal.
618e
Fig. 7. One month later, the distal lining extension has healed to the adjacent residual normal lining and is no longer dependent on the covering flap for blood supply. The nose is bulky and unsupported.
forehead flap transfer, available in the Related Videos section of the full-text article on PRSJournal. com or, for Ovid users, at http://links.lww.com/PRS/ A690.) The hairline, frown lines, and subunits of the nose and lip were marked with ink. Quarter-inch paper tapes, consolidated with collodion, are placed over the intact nasal surface to create exact templates of the contralateral normal. Foil patterns are made of the left hemitip, the left ala, and the left upper lip unit. The left hemitip is flipped over to create a pattern corresponding to the dimension and outline of the entire missing tip subunit. The left hemilip template is flipped over and repositioned on the right lip to establish the correct position of the future right alar base (Figs. 3 and 4). When designing a tip pattern, the paper model of the convex tip subunit will form a threedimensional cupola of the dome. This pattern is cut with scissors along its periphery to create a flat twodimensional foil template. The defect is recreated and residual normal landmarks are returned to their normal position. Scar is excised to open the airway. Then, the Sub-
unit Principle4,5 is appliedif a defect encompasses more than 50 percent of a convex nasal subunit (the tip or ala) and will be resurfaced with a flap, residual skin within the subunit is excised to resurface the defect as a subunit, rather than as an incomplete patch. Because all of the ala and the majority of the tip skin were missing or injured, residual normal skin
Fig. 6. (Continued) It is elevated as a full-thickness flap. Frontalis muscle is visible on its deep surface. It is rotated medially and folded distally to supply both lining and cover. Primary cartilage support is not placed within the folded nostril margin, and the right nasal rim remains unsupported.
Video 3. Supplemental Digital Content 3, which shows intermediate operation-reelevation of a forehead flap and design of an alar batten, is available in the Related Videos section of the fulltext article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, at http://links. lww.com/PRS/A691.
619e
Fig. 8. The intermediate operation. The nostril margin is incised, separating the distal extension from the proximal cover flap. Forehead skin with 2 to 3 mm of subcutaneous fat is elevated, based on the superior pedicle. The underlying recipient site is exposed, consisting of subcutaneous tissue, frontalis muscle, and a second folded layer of frontalis muscle and subcutaneous fat over the inner lining layer of forehead skin.
620e
Fig. 9. The excess soft tissue over the healed lining skin is excised, exposing a complete envelope of thin, supple, and vascularized lining, composed of residual lining and folded forehead skin.
621e
Video 4. Supplemental Digital Content 4, which demonstrates delayed primary tip and alar battens and return forehead flap to the recipient site, is available in the Related Videos section of the full-text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, at http://links.lww.com/PRS/A692.
622e
Fig. 10. The nostril margin is supported with a delayed primary cartilage ear graft, of correct length and border outline, based on the contralateral Normal alar margin template. A delayed primary tip graft is added to improve tip projection.
623e
Fig. 11. At the time of initial flap transfer, a few millimeters of skin was added between the cover and lining templates to permit easier folding of the distal flap for lining. During the second intermediate stage, this excess is trimmed, using the original forehead flap cover template to define the exact border outline of the right nostril margin in symmetry to the normal left rim.
Fig. 13. One month later (2 months after forehead flap transfer), the gap within the superior forehead has healed secondarily. The scar is excised and the forehead closed primarily.
position the nostril rim margin or place cartilage support within the folded flap. The threestage full-thickness flap eliminates these problems. Although the lining is initially too thick and
primary support is precluded (as in the traditional two-stage folded approach), excess bulk can be excised, a complete subunit support positioned, and symmetric nostril borders restored during the intermediate operation. The full-thickness flap resurfaced the entire tip and ala subunits and the distal extension was
Fig. 12. Thin conforming forehead skin is returned to the recipient site for cover.
624e
Video 5. Supplemental Digital Content 5, which demonstrates pedicle division, is available in the Related Videos section of the full-text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, at http:// links.lww.com/PRS/A693.
Video 6. Supplemental Digital Content 6, which demonstrates recipient inset, is available in the Related Videos section of the full-text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, at http:// links.lww.com/PRS/A694.
625e
Fig. 14. The flaps pedicle is divided. After debulking, the eyebrow is returned to the brow and the proximal pedicle is inset as a small inverted V. Distally, excess soft tissue is removed and the recipient inset is completed.
626e
Stage 4: Revision Almost all significant nasal reconstructions require a revision to refine delicate nasal landmarks
Fig. 15. Four months later, although bulky, basic nasal form has been restored.
627e
Fig. 16. The revision. The border outlines of the regional units and flap are marked. The contour of the left normal nose will be used to guide soft-tissue sculpting of the underlying soft tissue and cartilage grafts within the reconstructed tip and ala.
and establish ideal symmetry. (See Video, Supplemental Digital Content 7, which demonstrates late revision and postoperative results, available in the Related Videos section of the full-text article on PRSJournal.com or, for Ovid users, at http://links. lww.com/PRS/A695.) If present, an area of secondary forehead healing can be revised. Because all surgical stages had been discussed with the patient initially, the revision was expected. Four months later, the tip and alar landmarks are imprecise. The nostril is small and its margin bulky (Fig. 15). The flaps border, unexpected fullness at the join of the tip and ala and within the superior ala, and the ideal nostril diameter are marked, based on templates of the contralateral ala and nostril (Fig. 16). When a distinct alar crease must be restored, it is often useful to make a direct incision at its
ideal position, disregarding old scars.10 However, in this more subtle case, it was more appropriate to reelevate the forehead flap thinly over the right tip and ala through the flaps peripheral border. Excess soft tissue was excised to sculpt the expected depression between the tip and alar subunits and the ideal convexity of the superior ala. The nostril margin was incised, elevating the folded lining thinly, to excise excess subcutaneous fat and scar between the reconstructed lining and the previously placed delayed primary nostril margin cartilage graft. A small sponge bolus was placed within the nostril for 48 hours to temporarily reapproximate the lining against the undersurface of the cartilage graft (Fig. 17). Postoperatively, the forehead and nasal scars are virtually invisible. The nasal subunits are re-
628e
Fig. 17. The skin of the superior border of the flap is elevated thinly. Underlying excess scar and subcutaneous tissue are excised to sculpt the dorsal line, the expected depression between the tip and ala subunits, and the contour of the superior ala. The nostril margin is incised. Lining is elevated thinly and excess bulk between the lining and the delayed primary cartilage graft is excised to thin the nostril margin and debulk the airway.
stored. The reconstructed nostril is smaller but breathing is normal. Scarring within the lip and cheek caused by the initial necrosis awaits further maturation and modification (Fig. 18).
How can tissues be transferred and, importantly, modified to restore each missing anatomical layer with the correct skin quality, border outline, and three-dimensional contour? A regional unit approach provides principles that determine the timing of repair, staging, choice of materials, and design. The repair of large deep defects with a three-stage full-thickness forehead flap has the following advantages: Maximal blood supply at the time of initial transfer and during complete flap reelevation during the intermediate operation. Ideal conformable cover and a complete subunit support framework. The use of primary and delayed primary cartilage grafts. The opportunity to revise imperfections and maximize contour of the distalmost aesthetic parts of the nose before pedicle division. A safe and reliable method of folding a forehead flap to restore vascular, thin, and supple lining.
CONCLUSIONS
An operative plan must be developed before surgery. Important questions should be answered, including the following: What is the surgical goalhealed or restored to normal? What is missing? What is the true deficiency? Should a preliminary operation be performed before formal nasal reconstruction? How does the surgeon determine the correct dimension and outline of missing tissues? Where should the nose be positioned and how is that determined? Should the wound be altered in site, size, or depth? What materials, methods, and stages are required?
629e
Fig. 18. Postoperatively, forehead and nasal scars are virtually invisible. Nasal skin quality, border outline, and three-dimensional contour are restored. The dimension, volume, contour, and symmetry of the nose are normal. Scarring within the hairless triangle and medial cheek, which followed the initial injury, will be addressed in the future. Frederick J. Menick, M.D. 1102 North El Dorado Place Tucson, Ariz. 85715 drmenick@drmenick.com
4. Burget GC, Menick FJ. Aesthetic Reconstruction of the Nose. St. Louis: Mosby; 1994. 5. Millard DR Jr. Principlization of Plastic Surgery. Boston: Little, Brown; 1986. 6. Menick FJ. The evolution of lining in nasal reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:421441. 7. Burget GC, Menick FJ. Nasal support and lining: The marriage of beauty and blood supply. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 84:189202. 8. Menick FJ, Salibian A. Microvascular repair of heminasal, subtotal, and total defects with a folded radial forearm flap and a full-thickness forehead flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:637651. 9. Burget GC, Walton R. Optimal use of microvascular free flaps, cartilage grafts, and a paramedian forehead flap for aesthetic reconstruction of the nose and adjacent facial units. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120:11711207; discussion 12081216. 10. Menick FJ. An approach to the late revision of a failed nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;129:92e103e.
PATIENT CONSENT
The patient provided written consent for the use of her images.
REFERENCES
1. Menick FJ. Nasal Reconstruction: Art and Practice. Edinburgh: Saunders; 2008. 2. Gillies H, Millard DR Jr. The Principles and Art of Plastic Surgery. Boston: Little, Brown; 1957. 3. Menick FJ. 10-year experience in nasal reconstruction with the 3 stage forehead flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1839 1855; discussion 18561861.
630e