VOICES FROM BALI: GLOBAL CALL FOR A BETTER DEVELOPMENT

PROCEEDINGS ON THE CSO PREPARATORY MEETING AND ROUNDTABLE CONSULTATION AT 4TH MEETING OF HLPEP ON POSTPOST-2015 DEVELOPMENT AGENDA
BALI, MARCH 2323-25, 2013

VOICES FROM BA ALI: GLOBAL CALL FOR A BETTER DEVELOP PMENT

PROCE EEDINGS ON Indonesian CSO Os Coalition fo or Post-2015 Development D A Agenda THE CSO PREPARATO ORY MEETING AND ROUNDT TABLE CONSULTATION AT 4TH MEETING OF O HLPEP ON OST-2015 DEV VELOPMENT AG GENDA PO BALI, MAR RCH 23-25, 201 13

CON NVENORS:

IndonesianCSOsCoalition forPost2015Develo opmentAgend da

SUPP PORTEDBY:

AsiaWork kingGroup forPost2015DevelopmentAgenda a

FOREWORD Sugeng Bahagijo, INFID

I am pleased to submit to you the proceedings of CSO Outreach in the context of how Indonesian and global CSO try to influence the High Level Panel of Eminent Persons (HLP) for the Post-2015 development agenda, which took place in Bali on 23-25 of March 2013. The report contains ideas and the process of discussion among global CSOs. The report also contains documents on the specific proposal of CSO to the HLP for more desirable and feasible priorities and policies, which should be included in the official HLP report for the Post-2015 development agenda that will be submitted to UN General Secretary in May 2013. To highlight some key ideas agreed upon by CSO from the meeting, I could restate three points that should to be taken on board by HLP:

The key areas identified where changes or shifts that need to happen if we want a
better, just, and sustainable future, for all. CSO call that the post 2015 development agenda it must redistribute power, wealth and resources between and within

countries, between rich and poor, and between men and women...it must include full employment and decent work for all, combined with universal social protection, access to justice and progressive taxation

The scale of policy changes requires to enable desirable ideas and plans should
become feasible. For example, global CSO stated, nothing less than a wholly

transformative development framework is required to fulfil the international commitments of the past and present...Domestic resource mobilization must be enabled through changes in international tax regulation.

Technicalities and financing is needed to support the change both in developed and
in developing countries. CSO believed that Existing commitments on quantity and

quality of aid must be met. Loan-based forms of development cooperation should not be used to deliver financing commitments. Climate finance must be public,

i|P a g e

obligatory, predictable, grant-based, and free from conditionality. It must be additional to the other financial obligations of developed countries.

If we look back in 2000, when MDGs is being developed and agreed upon by all nations, no CSO or other stakeholders involved or participated meaningfully. MDGs were in fact from the UN and G7 countries for all nations. It is a simple and plain democratic deficit. Today, the UN tried to revise the MDGs process by making it more inclusive. From the London, Monrovia, and Bali meetings, CSO and other stakeholders participated in the formal structure of the process of the HLP meeting in the HLP one day interact and listen to the voice and inputs of varieties of stakeholders. More than 250/300 CSO participated during the CSO meeting in Bali. They came from Africa, Latin America, and Europe, MENA regions and Asia and Pacific. Dozens of wellresearched reports and documents were distributed during the meetings, including the water report, disability report and gender inequality report and Indonesian CSOs reports, to mention a few. I must admit that to prepare a smooth process and well-organized meeting for more than 200 participants from all over the world was not an easy task. Obviously, some weaknesses and loopholes need to be corrected in the coming meetings. But, according the feedback returned to the organizing committee, most of the participants stated that the meetings was well done. The global CSO meetings and the CSO interaction with HLP member become possible because the support and facilitation from Indonesian Government as a host meeting of HLPEP in Bali and the UN HLP Secretariat. Indonesian Presidential Delivery Unit (UKP4) and Ministry of Foreign Affairs deserved a high appreciation. It is more than proper for me to acknowledged persons and organizations that played crucial roles in making the CSO meeting in Bali possible. Those people are: (a) The CoChairs of CSO working groups who steer the meeting: Mr Ahmed Swapan Mahmud (Bangladesh), Ms Ruby Khalifah (Indonesia) and Mr. Anselmo Lee (Korea); (b) The CSO Asia Working Group (Nalini Vaz, Misun Woo, Paul Quintos and Wardarina, Michele ii|P a g e

 Anglade), Beyond 2015 Co-chairs (Neva Fracevvile and Mwangi Matiru) and Beyond 2015 Coordinators (Leo Williams); (c) Indonesian CSO Coalitions (Wicaksono Sarosa, Agung Wasono, A Qisai, Ruby Khalifah, Abetnego Tarigan, Wahyu Susilo, Dian Kartika Sari, Michael B Hoelman, Roy Abimanyu, Alex Irwan, Sigit Wijayanta, Setyo Budiantoro, Ratna Yunita, M Firdaus, Sita Aripurnami, and Laura Hukom); (d) The UN and DFID/UK Aid for financing the International CSOs; (e) The Ford Foundation, Kemitraan, Tifa Foundation, and Oxfam for financing the Indonesian participants This report will not be possible without the huge help from Darmawan Triwibowo, as the lead writer, and the team of rapporteurs (Beka Hapsara, Diana Gultom, Vida Paradi, Samuel Gultom, Abdul Ghofur, and Rizal Malik for the extra help in the HLP consultation) who prepared this report. To them I wanted to express my deep gratitude and appreciation. Finally, I would also like to express my deepest gratitude to my colleagues at the INFID secretariat, especially Hamong Santono, who have worked tirelessly and with full commitment. Jakarta, April 6, 2013.

iii|P a g e

TABLE OF CONTENT

Foreword by Sugeng Bahagijo ( INFID) Executive Summary

i vi

I.

Background Global Call for a Better Development 1.1. 1.2. 1.3. 1.4. Charting the Post-2015 Route Monrovia Message The Red Flag from Bonn Expected Outcomes from Bali Meeting 1 2 3 5

II.

The CSOs Preparatory Meeting Strengthening the Voice of Global Community 2.1. 2.2. 2.3. 2.4. 2.5. 2.6. Opening Session (March 23) Current update on Substantive Context (March 23) Regional and National Preparatory Meeting (March 23) Thematic Working Group Round (March 23-24) Sectoral Working Group Round (March 24) Adoption of Statement and Synthesis (March 24) 6 8 10 12 14 14

III.

CSO Communiqu, Thematic and Sectoral Statements the Global CSO Forum on the Post 2015 Development Agenda 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. Civil Society Communiqu Thematic Statement Sectoral Statement 15 19 34

IV.

The CSOs Roundtable Consultation with HLP Members Chasing Pavements? 4.1. 4.2. 4.3. The Town Hall Meeting (March 25) The Roundtable Consultation (March 25) Communiqu Meeting of the HLP on the Post-2015 Development Agenda 44 45 50

V.

The Way Forward Towards and Beyond New York by Dwi Rubiyanti Kholifah (Co-Chair, Indonesia CSO Coalition) 53

iv|P a g e


Annex Annex 1. CSO Preparatory Meeting Program Annex 2. Researcher Presentation to the HLP Town Hall Meeting Annex 3. Inter-faith Declaration for the Post-2015 Development Framework Annex 4. Feedback from participants Annex 5. List of national and international participants Annex 6. Photos Annex 7. Media Coverage

v|P a g e

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The Bali meeting was the fourth HLP meeting and the last stakeholders consultation round before the submission of the HLP report on Post-2015 development agenda. The meeting brought vital program, especially the discussion on global partnership and the means of implementation, as the continuation of the previous talk in Monrovia. The Bali meeting from March 25 27, 2013, had three objectives, namely: Defining global partnership on the Post-2015 development agenda Defining means of implementation in order to achieve the Post-2015 development agenda Defining the way forward in order to reach the consensus on the Post-2015 development agenda Aside from the global partnership and means of implementation, the consultation included the discussion on the vision and mission of the new development framework, global governance and accountability, and the issue of informal sector and inclusion. The CSO Preparatory Meeting that took place on March 23-24 was aimed to consolidate the voices from marginal and grass roots community in the global South. There were 135 national/Indonesian and 130 international participants from various civil society organizations and community groups from 6 regions in the world who attended the meeting. The meeting served as an open and inclusive forum to prepare the position of the CSOs towards the consultation to influence the HLP communiqu and its final report. The Government of Indonesia facilitated the consultation on March 25, 2013 through a town hall meeting and series of round table discussion. The CSO Preparatory Meeting produced a CSO communiqu, six thematic statements, and seven statement from sectoral groups which includes: (i) migrant worker, refugee, and internally displaced people (ii) Indigenous people, ethnic minorities, Dalits, and other socially excluded groups; (iii) children, person with disabilities, and ageing; (iv) women, victims of gender base violence, and LBT; (v) human rights defender, democracy advocate, development worker under threat; (vi) small peasant, fisher folk, and coastal communities; and (vii) worker, unemployed, and urban poor. The outputs highlighted three points that should to be taken on board by HLP: The key areas identified where changes or shifts that need to happen if we want a better, just, and sustainable future, for all. The scale of policy changes requires to enable desirable ideas and plans should become feasible. Technicalities and financing is needed to support the change both in developed and in developing countries.

vi|P a g e

Through the lens of marginalized, vulnerable and minority groups, the participants of the meeting got common understanding on global partnership, which should address equal partnership, respect human rights, and dignity. Ownership should be translated into improving local capacity and taking into consideration that each country has its uniqueness and has different level of responsibilities. While, to change structural imbalances, international trade policy and rules must consider local potentials and sustainability, therefore the internal resource mobilization, fair trade, international tax regulation, avoid privatization; protect common goods, elimination structural violence against women, transparency and accountability must be highlighted into the new framework. Equality, inclusiveness and non-discrimination must be strong embedded as principles for post 2015 framework. The CSO must bring up the process to prepare future steps of advocacy in order to ensure that key words of equality, inclusiveness, sustained environment, and equal partnership are visible. The CSO must prepare better for responding final report of the HLP.

vii|P a g e

I.

BACKGROUND GLOBAL CALL FOR A BETTER DEVELOPMENT

Between now and 2015, we must make sure that promises made become promises kept
(UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon, the MDG Summit, September 22, 2010)

1.1.

Charting the Post 2015 Route

The clock is ticking. Less than two years from its 2015 deadline, the worlds nations still struggle to fulfill their Millennium Development Goals pledge on time. While the target to halve the number of people living in extreme poverty could still be possible, meeting the other targets would be a Herculean task. Ban Ki-Moon, the UN Secretary General, has acknowledged, The

world needs to look beyond 2015, even though progress on the MDGs has been fitful1. Against
the backdrop of this latest progress, he formed a High-level Panel (HLP) who will advise him on the global development agenda after 2015.2 The output of the Panel will be a report that include recommendations regarding the vision of Post-2015 development agenda; key principles for reshaping the global partnership for development and strengthened accountability mechanisms. The report will put forward recommendations on how to build and sustain broad political consensus on an ambitious yet achievable Post-2015 development agenda around the three dimensions of economic growth, social equality and environmental sustainability.3 In response to the initiative, Member States have called for open, inclusive consultations involving governments, parliaments, civil society, private sector, academia and research institutions from all regions, in addition to the UN system, to advance the process. Therefore, the HLP should engage and consult widely with relevant constituencies at national, regional and global levels through four rounds of meeting and consultation before present the final report to the Secretary-General in May 2013.4 The first meeting of the HLP took place in New York on September 25, 2012, while the second meeting of the HLP was held in London from October 31 to November 2, 2012 with focus on individual and household level poverty. Monrovia in Liberia was the place of the third meeting on January 30 to February 1, 2013 with emphasis on the topic of national building

blocks for sustained prosperity and economic transformation. The Bali meeting was the last

Quoted from Whither the postMDG development agenda?, see www.guardian.co.uk/globaldevelopment/poverty matters/2011/jul/15/millenniumdevelopmentgoalsbeyond2015 2 ThepanelisCoChairedbytheUKPrimeMinisterDavidCameron,LiberianPresidentEllenJohnsonSirleaf,andPresidentSusiloBambang Yudhoyono, of Indonesia. It consist of 27 Eminent Persons who act in their personal capacity. See The United Nations Press Release on July31,2012.UNSecretaryGeneralAppointsHighLevelPanelonPost2015DevelopmentAgenda. 3 Ibid 4 CommuniquontheSecretaryGeneralsHighLevelPanelofEminentPersonsonthePost2015DevelopmentAgendaUpdateonthefirst meetingofthePanel,29October2012
1

1|P a g e

meeting before the report deliberation that highlighted the discussion on global partnership and

means of implementation.

Figure 1. The HLP Time Frame and Rounds of Meeting Source: The Government of Indonesia (2013)

1.2.

Monrovia Message

The meeting in Monrovia was the midway point of the consultative process and the most recent event prior to Bali. During the meeting, the members of the HLP participated in the outreach session with diverse stakeholders and discussed the national building blocks required for sustained prosperity.5 The HLP shared the vision to end extreme poverty in all its forms in the context of sustainable development, and to make gains in poverty eradication irreversible.6 It agreed to make every effort to achieve the MDGs by 2015, while also framing a single and cohesive Post-2015 development agenda that integrates economic growth, social inclusion and environmental protection. Therefore, economic growth alone is not sufficient to ensure social justice, equity, and sustained prosperity for all people. It believed that the global community must pursue economic and social transformation leading to sustained and inclusive economic growth at the local, national, and global level, as well as protecting and empowering the people.

5 6

SeeCommuniquMeetingoftheHighLevelPanelofEminentPersonsonThePost2015DevelopmentAgendainMonrovia,Liberiaon 1February2013 Ibid

2|P a g e

The HLP underlined that achieving structural transformation through global development agenda will involve:

Sustainable growth with equity.

The global community must promote good governance,

invest in stable and accountable institutions, fight corruption, ensure the rule of law, and build resilience to shocks in all countries. Economic and social justice that ensures individual choice and the opportunity for all is indispensable. It includes the empowerment of women and girls, investments in young peoples development and expanding the social protection schemes, and ensuring universal learning and access to health care, including sexual and reproductive health.

Creating wealth through sustainable and transparent management of natural resources.

whilst promoting sustainable development.

The

current pattern of natural resources exploitation must be altered to benefit local populations,

Partnerships.

It must encourage the national and local governments to work with private

sector and civil society to align their effort behind sustainable development, as well as promoting interactions between countries and new partnerships through trade, foreign direct investment, and cooperation to eradicate poverty and bring prosperity for all. 1.3. The Red Flag from Bonn

The civil society organizations (CSOs) have engaged in the dialogue and exercised their role as independent development actors7 by voicing their inputs and concerns to the HLP since the London meeting8. In their communiqu towards the meeting in Monrovia, the CSOs urged the Panel to promote inclusive and sustainable growth and human development, underpinned by a rights based approach that strengthens citizenship, participation and empowerment, and guarantees decent employment and universal social protection.9 CSOs called on the Panel to become champions for increases in pro/poor and gender/responsive budgets for human development and human rights; to support making governments, multilateral and bilateral agencies accountable through well/resourced and effective institutions for participatory monitoring and evaluation; and to promote the implementation of existing conventions and protocols on the rights of people. They also demanded the Panel to ensure that the Post-2015

One ofthe principles in The Busan Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation that was adopted in the 4 High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness on December 2011 admits that CSO play vital role in shaping development policies and promoting rightbased approaches and that all parties, including donors, will implement fully the respective commitments to enable CSOs to exercise their role asindependentdevelopmentactors. 8 See the Press Statement Highlevel Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post2015 Development Agenda at the conclusion of the Panels secondmeeting,2November2012,London,UnitedKingdom 9 SeetheOutcomeDocumentoftheCSOsMonroviaConsultationforthePost2015DevelopmentAgenda

th

3|P a g e

development framework increases financial resources and policy space for human development and human rights, and creates incentives, institutions and processes in which people and civil society organizations can participate effectively to design, implement and monitor economic and social trends, funding, policies and programs. The CSOs developed and delivered stronger messages to the Panel in the wake of Bali meeting through CSOs conference held in Bonn, Germany from 20--22 March 2013. In their call, A Red

Flag for the Post 2015 High Panel, the CSOs cautioned the HLP against developing a set of
reductive goals, targets and indicators that ignore the transformative changes required to address the failure of the current development model. The current development model is rooted in unsustainable production and consumption patterns and exacerbates inequality as well as gender, race and class inequities. namely: Stop the land and water grabs by the businesses and governments conducted without the free, prior and informed consent of individuals and communities Eliminate financial support for harmful extractive industry and economic activities, introduce regulations that protect communities as well as mechanisms for redress that require companies to clean up and pay for their messes Respect the planetary boundaries and the rights of future generation by implementing the principles of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities Affirm the gender justice Promote economic and financial architecture that ensure gender, environmental and social justice as well as recognize that care and social reproduction are intrinsically linked with the productive economy and should therefore be fully reflected in macroeconomic policies. Adopting the existing international human rights architecture to provide a universally recognized framework that clearly delineates the common but differentiated responsibilities of all actors to respect, protect and fulfill human rights, both within and between countries. Guarantee that the Post-2015 framework should be conflict-sensitive and ensure the safety, security and sustainability of life, ensure an end to gender-based violence, promotes social cohesion, people's participation and foster an environment where people live in freedom and with ownership and control of their own resources. Create, strengthen and implement clear transparent accessible mechanisms of accountability that empower all people to monitor and hold governments, financial institutions, development actors and the private sector to account in order to be legitimate and effective. The call strongly stated that for CSOs to support a Post-2015 framework or the High Level Panel's recommendations the HLP must address eight key issues,

4|P a g e

1.4.

Expected Outcomes from Bali Meeting

The Bali meeting, as acknowledged by CSOs that gathered in Bonn, was important due to its position as the last stakeholders consultation round before the submission of the HLP report. The meeting brought vital agenda, especially on global partnership and the means of implementation, as the continuation of the previous talk in Monrovia.10 The Bali meeting from March 25 27, 2013, had three objectives11, namely: Defining global partnership on the Post-2015 development agenda Defining means of implementation in order to achieve the Post-2015 development agenda Defining the way forward in order to reach the consensus on the Post-2015 development agenda Aside from the global partnership and means of implementation, the consultation included the discussion on the vision and mission of the new development framework, global governance and accountability, and the issue of informal sector and inclusion. The CSO Preparatory Meeting that took place on March 23-24 was aimed to consolidate the voices from marginal and grass roots community in the global South.12 The meeting served as an open and inclusive forum to prepare the position of the CSOs towards the consultation to influence the HLP communiqu and its final report.13 The Government of Indonesia facilitated the consultation on March 25, 2013 through a town hall meeting and series of round table discussion.

SeeCommuniquMeetingoftheHighLevelPanelofEminentPersonsonThePost2015DevelopmentAgendainMonrovia.Op.Cit. SeeTheGovernmentofIndonesia.2013.DebriefonthePost2015DevelopmentAgenda. 12 See Strengthening the Voice of Global Community, Proposal and Workplan toSupport the CSO Outreach in the 4th HLPEP Meeting in Bali. 13 Ibid
11 10

5|P a g e

II.

THE CSO PREPARATORY MEETING STRENGTHENING THE VOICE OF GLOBAL COMMUNITY

Nothing less than a wholly transformative development framework is required to fulfill the

international commitments of the past and present

(Civil Society Communiqu, Bali, March 24, 2013)

2.1.

Opening Session (March 23)

The session began with the opening remarks from the host, represented by Sugeng the Bahagijo, importance Executive of the Director of INFID Indonesia. Sugeng stressed meeting as vehicle to ensure that the Post-2015 Development Agenda would not repeat the fate of MDGs, which based on good intention but failed to shift the global development policy. He explained the background of the two-day meeting, its objective to prepare collective voices and underlined that a strong and specific proposal to HLP for Post-2015 agenda from CSO was expected as the output. As a co-chair, Dwi Rubiyanti Khalifah from the Indonesian CSO Coalition gave her remarks to the process. The remarks reminded that Bali is the final consultation round that would put emphasize on global partnership and means of implementation. Ruby hoped that the participants could use the forum to develop a clear proposal that accommodated grassroots voice to the HLP members. After the opening remarks, Anselmo Lee, the co-chair from ADA, and the participants reviewed the final draft of the agenda for March 23-25, which has been circulated to the participants. He also announced that the materials can be downloaded from the websites: http://www.post2015bali.org and http://www.post2015hlp.org. He pointed out that the meeting will not only about Bali, but will also discuss the next steps after Bali (Beyond Bali). Then, he called out the participants to stand up when he called out their regions.

6|P a g e

The session continued with the presentation from key speakers, which consist of Lisa John (HLP Secretariat), Yanuar Nugroho (The Government of Indonesia/UKP4), Shalina Sanou (ACORD, Kenya), and Kathryn Tobin (NGLS). The objective of the presentations was to brief the participants with the latest update the participants on the progress of the consultation process. Lisa described the overall HLP consultation framework and explained the outputs of each round from New York to Monrovia. Despite the good progress in the engagement between CSOs and HLP members in the current process, Lisa urged the CSOs to use the Bali meeting to start discuss difficult topics with the HLP. It would be important to start addressing the thorny topics such as private sector accountability, financing for development, or common pool resources. 2013. Yanuar highlighted the current effort from the Government of Indonesia to engage with the Post 2015 process, which included the Regional (Asia Pacific) Meeting and Stakeholder Consultation on the Post-2015 Development Agenda, on December 13-14, 2012, and the preparation of Bali HLP meeting on March 25-27, 2013. He detailed the objectives of the Bali meeting and its expected outcomes, as well as presented some possible contested issues in the meeting. He also reminded the participants on the importance of inter governmental process to approve Post-2015 agenda after the HLP process completed. Shalina, on the other hand, provided the participants with the general overview on the Monrovia meeting. She explained that the HLP and stakeholders in the Monrovia meeting has agreed on the trajectory for Post-2015 in a single and cohesive development agenda that integrated economic growth, social inclusion and environmental protection. The CSOs urged the HLP to promote inclusive and sustainable growth and human development, underpinned by a rights based approach that strengthens citizenship, participation and empowerment, and guarantees decent employment and universal social protection. Kathryn, as the last speaker for this session, introduced of World We Want web platform (www.worldwewant2015.org). The World We Want is an initiative led by CSOs and UN together to support public participation in the development process. It is a politically recognized mechanism, and operates under the Post-2015 development agenda. She urged the participants to utilize the platform to voice their concern regarding the HLP consultation process. She also requested the participants to prepare the engagement strategy beyond the HLP process after May

7|P a g e

2.2.

Current update on Substantive Context (March 23)

The session was chaired by Wicaksana Sarosa (Kemitraan, Indonesia) and Patricia M. Sarenas (Code-NGO, Philippines). It aimed to provide the participants with insights on the specific context of Indonesia and deeper understanding on the latest progress of key substantive issues in the global South, especially on human rights and democracy, economic development and inequality, social development and justice, peace, security and fragility, as well as environment and sustainability. There were seven speakers in this session. Michael B. Hoelman (Tifa Foundation) and Setyo Budiantoro (Prakarsa) explained the Indonesia context, while Teresita Vistro (APWLD, Philippines), Isagani Serrano (Social Watch, Philippines), Cai Yiping (DAWN, China), Gagan Sethi (JANVIKAS, India), and Alejandro Barrios (Bolivia) explained the context of the global South, especially Asia. Michael outlined the challenges faced by Indonesia after the return of democracy. A period of growth without significant increase in employment nor reduction in poverty rate (grow-verty) is the main economic challenge in the current development process. Growing inequality, reflected by the rising Gini ratio, which goes hand in hand with low tax ratio and social spending shows that the current development is not sustainable. He also highlighted key socio-political challenges, especially in deepening democracy beyond procedural mechanism, and mainstreaming human rights principles to manage its diverse society. He believes that the priority would be for the government to consider growth with equality. It can be achieved by supporting the marginalized groups to have a stronger voice and influence in their government decision making, through a more inclusive and sustainable development way, as well as strengthening integrity system, and doing more social investment to its citizen. Setyo, on the other hand, focused his presentation on the inequality problems in Indonesia. He explained that the Indonesias experience shows a highly concentrated wealth is not only offend the sense of justice, but also leads to a fragile economy/society. Therefore, any poverty alleviation program without improving access to productive assets for the poor and marginalized will not solve the core problem. He concluded that tax reform towards tax justice, higher social spending for citizens and stronger participatory governance is important to reduce inequality and strengthen the government accountability. During the presentation, Isagani stressed his belief that inequality is not an unavoidable condition in development process. In order to reduce inequality, the world must change the way it measures development by putting well-being, especially for the most vulnerable, as the measuring scale. It is imperative to maintain food security by managing the natural resources wisely, building foundation for sustainable local economy, and restore the balance between the production capacity and the current consumption rate. According to Isagani, it is vital to strengthen the role of social enterprise and informal economy as equalizer for the global

8|P a g e

economy, promoting sustainable energy for all, and ensure the enabling condition by improving governance that will deliver development outcome that is more sustainable and equal.. Therefore, economic development with inequality are unacceptable. Gagan Sethi outlined key factors that contribute to the growing inequality in the global South, especially in country like India. Those factors are: Deficiencies in decentralized planning (in the area of transparency and accountability) Bottlenecks in budgetary processes powers to the last / first post) Systemic weaknesses in the government apparatus in the states, particularly the backward states that has weakened the capacity of the government apparatus to implement the development plan. Moreover, when people are seeking for justice, they only faced the low quality of service, delay in justice process, mixing of dispute resolution with justice, and the fact that government becoming the biggest litigants. As consequence, it produces more fear rather than trust, violence, increased discrimination and exclusion especially women and religious minority and caste. He recommended series of key steps to reverse the course by developing: Equitable, representative, just, and accountable governance (access to justice, time bound social spending) Enabling full human potential (quality education and health care, skill development) Freedom from fear (equal access to state, market, and social institution, human rights principles) Ecological sustainability (balance between growth and environmental protection) Wealth creation and financing development equitably (access to credit, market, and media) Inclusive and effective decentralized planning process (such as delay in the flow of funds, delay in sending sanction orders for spending, decision-making being centralized , low delegation of financial

Teresita, on her view, argued that a sound environment is essential for development. However, the current development practice has deteriorated the environment and marginalized poor people, including women, who did less destruction, and are protectors of natural resources. She believed that there is a failure on environment governance since all process has been decided in the closed rooms without the participation of the marginalized groups. The women groups believe that re-visioning development is possible by asserting new development model, which is protective to environment, and reduce poverty. It must be focused in promoting sustainable community, environment, and economy for all.

9|P a g e

Alejandro, representative of grassroots community from Bolivia, stated that participation of grassroots in the development should be increased. He said that the campaign in Latin America countries has a clear intention to question the structural problems and .working to change the neoliberal regime that has a negative impact to the local people. The campaign proposes alternative model that involve a deeper change for livelihood with the support from .grassroots organizations and social movements and other groups who have been doing it for years. The people in the grassroots, according to Alejandro, suffer from ecological injustice and refuse the dominant idea that capitalist growth could be ecological. He believed that we should be stating everywhere: what comes with capitalist growth is a lie!

2.3.

Regional and National Preparatory Meeting (March 23)

The

meeting and

continued national meeting The that

with a break out session for regional preparatory among into

countries. groups of

participants were divided eight consisted Indonesia

(Indonesia CSO Coalition), Asia (ADA), Africa (African Working Group), Latin and Central America, Europe and North America, Middle East and North Africa (MENA), Central Asia, and Global CSO networks. The Indonesia CSO Coalition has held their national consultation and preparatory meeting on January 22-23, 2013 in Jakarta. Therefore, the Indonesia CSO utilized this session to prepare their members to discuss the thematic issue on vision and priorities, global partnerships, means of implementation, global governance and accountability, and informal economy and inclusion. The participants for Indonesia group were clustered into seven sectoral groups, namely: Indigenous peoples, farmer and fisher-folk, victims of conflict and natural disaster, women, interfaith community, labor and migrant workers, and persons with disabilities and minority groups (LGBT, person with HIV/AIDS, ethnic minority). In terms of the vision, the Indigenous peoples group recommended the Post 2015 development agenda to accommodate the recognition and protection to the existence, Indigenous peoples rights, and the cultural values held by generations as the basis for sustainable development. The agenda, according to the group, must set priorities on the recognition and protection against threat on the rights to land, territory, and natural resources, including the rights to water, to

10|P a g e

ensure food sovereignty, living pattern in accordance with local values, and the conservation of communal-base property rights. The group also urged that the global partnership must abide to the principles of true partnership and mutual trust, as well as mutual transparency and acceptance in cooperation that guarantee and support the development among and between indigenous peoples as process of learning and knowledge transfer. Furthermore, the group insisted that the means of implementation must include support for Indigenous peoples financial independence through alternative mechanisms of financial management, and space and access for indigenous peoples to manage and develop the natural wealth and assets of their customary area. Development indicators in general should provide flexibility according to the indigenous peoples uniqueness. point of view. It must be based on the interests and needs of indigenous peoples holistically and not solely determined from income Therefore, every state is responsible and should ensure the protection of indigenous peoples living space and the value system, as well as must ensure the indigenous peoples can have full and effective participation in each stage and process of development, which includes planning, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. On the other hand, the group of person with disabilities and minority demanded that the Post 2015 development agenda adopt several key words, such as save, resilient, human rights, equitable, sustainable, inclusive, accessible, participatory and political representation, and non-discrimination in its vision and priorities. The group urged that the global partnerships must be based on the principles of justice and balance that into account in forms of capacity building, networking, equal resource and exchange distribution, and universal and equal partnership. Moreover, in the context of means of implementation, the group called for the implementation of international and national convention/legal framework to ensure inclusive and non-discriminatory policy and practice. The budgeting process that support financial inclusion, extend the scope of social protection by the state, particularly for minorities, and the importance for the states to acknowledge the existence of minority groups (political identity) are also important means of implementation. Regarding the informal economy and inclusion, the group believes that the Post-2015 development agenda must provide special support to the informal sector, inclusively, so the informal sector can be one of the main pillars for development. As an affirmative action to push for protection of minority groups living in informal sector, the group needs to have financial policies that support access to the capital or special credit scheme and marketing products for minority groups. The group of inter-faith community, formulated the vision for Post-2015 development agenda as sustainable development that is inclusive, fair, and dignified, which eliminates inequalities in economy, gender, social and political. The focus of the development is the quality of life. To fulfill

11|P a g e

this vision, the framework should include specific and measurable goals, targets and indicators to end poverty, ensure environmental sustainability, enable equity of opportunity and outcomes for individuals, ensure equal human rights and make peace, safety and security a reality for all. The other group, the victims of conflict and natural disaster, underlined the importance of global partnership to adopt principles that prioritize the interest of the community in partnership negotiation (people-centered). In this approach, substantive participation should be the key pillar. It means that the escalation of vulnerability does not necessarily put the victims as the passive group with no capacity. The women group highlighted key points in the global governance and accountability. They

urged developed countries to show stronger commitment to build a just and a sustainable development, especially in natural and human resources management. Developed countries should determine a binding and a clear sanction mechanism to the countries, which violated the commitment and agreement, such as environmental destruction or violating human rights. Meanwhile, developing countries and the Least Developed Countries (LDCs) should be together in solidarity, such as making the common agreement on policy in related to a gender-just sustainable development. The group also requested the private sector to put forward and to use the gender-justice principle in their operations, and pay attention to the natural resources sustainability for the sake of the next generation On the other hand, the group of labor and migrant worker argued that the Post-2015 development agenda must guarantee the fulfillment of their rights, fairness, independence, and free from exploitative interest. The proposed agenda must address the reform in fiscal policies, the institutionalization of right base approach, and the focus on human development. The global partnership in the Post-2015 development agenda must be aimed to improve and fulfill the workers rights, promote workers participation in the decision making process, and ensure that workers are part of international community. Global partnership is an international solidarity form, with no intention in supporting any anti-Indonesian migrant workers sentiment abroad and anti-foreign workers sentiment in Indonesia. The partnerships can be done through the financing scheme mechanism (which provides the funds; define the allocation, for whom and good governance). Global partnerships must bring benefits to the fulfillment of the workers rights. 2.4. Thematic Working Group Round (March 23-24) It facilitated in depth The

The thematic working group round took place on March 23 and 24.

discussion among the participants on five key issues of post 2015 development agenda. inputs for CSOs communiqu and statement to HLP.

outputs of this round would be endorsed in the Adoption of Statement session. It served as The participants were divided into five thematic groups which consist of vision and priorities (facilitated by GCAP and Save the Children), global partnerships (facilitated by CPDE and LDC Watch), means of implementation (facilitated by

12|P a g e

ActionAid and ADB Watch), global governance and accountability (facilitated by CIVICUS), and informal economy and inclusion (facilitated by ITUC). DAWN. The round aimed to help CSOs consolidated their answers on key questions that determine the success of Post-2015 development agenda. In the context of vision and priorities, the key question for Post-2015 debates has been whether a new framework should maintain the MDGs focus on developing country commitments, or ensure a truly universal vision and framework for the future of development for all. If reducing inequality would be the priority, how do CSOs respond to the withdrawal of state from ensuring provisioning of basic entitlements to its citizens, especially the most disadvantaged? How do CSOs ensure coherence between different development and environmental agendas? How do CSOs include transparent mechanisms and processes in the global accountability mechanism so that citizens, including children, can hold countries and other actors to account on commitments made? How we ensure increased policy spaces to foster South-South cooperation in participating and influencing the Post-2015 development agenda. In implementing global partnerships, the discussion in this round addressed key questions on the principles that should guide and should be followed by all stakeholders under the Global Partnership framework. It addressed the limitations of the previous processes and covenants on development and outcomes that should be delivered by the renewed Global Partnership deliver. Furthermore, it discussed the way a new framework could encourage partnerships and coordination between and within countries at all stages of development, and with non-state actors such as business, civil society and foundations. The discussion on the means of implementation underlined the questions on how to obtain adequate quantity of financial support needed for implementation throughout the life of the framework, bearing in mind the potentially ambitious nature of a new framework including also a broad environmental dimension. Would direct financing using aid and new sources of development cooperation as well as leveraging private investment be the key? It also addressed questions on how to adapt the trade, financial regulation, climate and other areas of policy governance to complement means that are made available, or at least not undermining them. Meanwhile, in response to global governance and accountability, the discussion tackled the issues on how to allow for localization and customization to country contexts in the Post 2015 development agenda, including in the adaption of goals, targets and indicators, and the elaboration of intervention methods that best speak to and build local demands, assets and capacities. It discussed how civil society and other stakeholders are working together to ensure the successful implementation and integration of key global development agendas. Apart from these five thematic groups, women groups held their own thematic consultation. The process was facilitated by APWLD and

13|P a g e

The discussion explored key issues in the informal economy and inclusion.

It discussed the

practical measures governments can take in order to address the issue of informality in the short and medium term as well as the effective policy to ensure that people in the informal economy have access to the same benefits and protections that are afforded to the rest of society. It also dealt with the questions on the need to fundamentally uproot or formalize the informal economy in the long term, and what challenges/risks and opportunities/advantages would emerge when trying to connect the informal economy with formal marketplace. 2.5. Sectoral Working Group Round (March 24)

The sectoral working group round was a break out session that took place on March 24. The session aimed to draft common statement and specific statement from seven working groups that represent the global community in the HLP consultation. The working groups consist of: Migrant worker, refugee, and internally displaced people (IDP) Indigenous people, ethnic minorities, Dalits, and other socially excluded groups Children, person with disabilities, and ageing Women, victims of gender base violence, and LBT Human rights defender, democracy advocate, development worker under threat Small peasant, fisher folk, and coastal communities Worker, unemployed, and urban poor

The outputs of this round would be endorsed in the Synthesis session at the end of CSOs preparatory meeting. 2.6. Adoption of Statements and Synthesis (March 24)

The Adoption of Statements session aimed to share outcomes of each thematic working group and finalize CSOs thematic statements. The session was chaired by Yuyun Wahyuningrum (Human Rights Working Group/HRWG, Indonesia), and Justin Michael Kilcullen (CONCORD). The chair and participants listened from the rapporteur of each thematic working group and discussed the final draft of the statement. The Synthesis session aimed to share the outcome of sectoral working group to the plenary, discussed and finalized the statements of outcome of CSO forum, and the engagement strategies during the consultation with the HLP. found in the following chapter. The session was chaired by Dian Kartika Sari (KPI, The detail thematic and sectoral statement can be Indonesia) and Anselmo Lee (ADA, Korea).

14|P a g e

III.

CSO COMMUNIQUE, THEMATIC, AND SECTORAL STATEMENTS THE GLOBAL CSO FORUM ON THE POST 2015 DEVELOPMENT AGENDA
Be specific ! (Anselmo Lee, ADA)

3.1.

Civil Society Communique

As the final meeting of the High-Level Panel on the Post-2015 development agenda begins in Bali, Indonesia, we, the members of global, regional and national civil society urge the HLP to match the ambition it has expressed by calling for a transformative, universal, people-centered development framework. We call on the HLP to live up to its moral obligation to outline the bold commitments needed for a new paradigm of sustainable development, firmly rooted in existing economic, social, cultural, civic and political human rights obligations. We believe nothing less than a wholly transformative development framework is required that puts into action the words of the past and present. It must produce concrete processes to achieve outcomes and tackle structural root causes. It must be firmly rooted in a vision centered on the principles of human rights, equity, social, gender and climate justice, participation, accountability, and non-discrimination. It must ensure happiness and wellbeing, dignity, safety and resilience. And it must redistribute power, wealth and resources between and within countries, between rich and poor, and between men and women. The framework must be based on acting on the demands of grassroots voices - the poor and marginalized in whose name development operates; civil society must be fully engaged in a codetermined post-HLP processes, including the Open Working Group and inter-state consensusbuilding phase from September 2013; the role of the private sector in development must focus on small-scale producers and local economies, and corporate bias must be eradicated with corporations made subject to enforceable international accountability in line with human rights and social partnerships. If the new development framework is to tackle the unresolved problems of poverty and inequality nothing less than this will suffice. Indeed, anything less than this will not be supported by civil society.

Context
As the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) near their target date, a new development framework is being discussed in a world far different from that, which contextualized the Millennium Declaration.

15|P a g e

Financial, food and environmental crises are presenting new challenges that are undercutting gains made in development. The dominant neoliberal growth model is exposed by entrenched and deepening poverty and inequality. Human rights remain without respect, protection and fulfillment, and are exacerbated by economic, social and gender injustice. Three of nine planetary boundaries have been breached, and there is a distinct lack of international, binding commitments to tackle the planetary emergency. Half the worlds population lives on less than US$2.50 per day. Some 2 billion live in multidimensional poverty, a measure incorporating nutrition, education, infant mortality and sanitation, among others. The wealthiest 20 percent of humankind enjoy more than 80 percent of the worlds total wealth while the bottom 20 percent share only 1 percent.

Global Partnerships and Means of Implementation

MDG8 aspired to support the delivery of the MDGs through global partnerships and means of implementation, but suffered from a lack of political commitment and clearly defined, binding targets and responsibilities. It was not explicitly linked to other MDGs, left out non-traditional donors, and did not assign responsibility to developing countries. As such, there remains no democratic, global and multi-stakeholder executing mechanism or enforcement body to ensure commitments on development cooperation are met - non-binding statements are not translated into action, and developing countries must still contest for the democratic ownership of their development strategies. Multilateralism has weakened over the last decade, with the current regime favoring powerful states to the detriment of the rest, and regional bilateral partnerships the preferred model. The lack of a strong framework for inclusive and equitable partnerships means the financial crisis has underscored existing gaps in development financing, which has shrunk when it has been most needed, setting the stage for future debt crises. There remains little coordination and coherence in defining the role of emerging economies in providing development finance and South-South Cooperation. The private sector is increasingly emphasized by governments as an important development actor, but it is one that lacks appropriate regulation and accountability: the conditions for private sector engagement risk undermining development gains rather than supporting them, through sharply escalating human inequalities. Although formally recognized as an independent development actor in its own right, civil society is not granted the voice or resources to fulfill this role in society. At the same time the last decade has brought to attention the potential failure of new sources of financing. Illicit financial flows, capital flight, and tax avoidance by multinational corporations are draining many of the poorest countries of resources for development. Unfair trade rules have led to the bankruptcy, destitution and destruction of millions of small farmers and local markets in

16|P a g e

developing countries. Unbridled and misguided liberalization has encouraged a race to the bottom in labor rights and working conditions, with women and girls bearing the brunt of these impacts. Priority areas The vision and priorities of the post-2015 framework must include a focus on indigenous peoples, religious and ethnic minority groups, marginalized caste groups, stateless people, people living in remote and conflict or disaster-affected areas, women, children, youth, the aged, disabled, sexual minorities, people living with HIV, small-scale food producers, and the informal sector. The framework must ensure accountability through disaggregated data on progress based on these definitions. It must also include full employment and decent work for all, combined with universal social protection and fair and equitable taxation. It requires a commitment to equitable access and governance of natural resources, building climate-resilient livelihoods through low carbon development pathways, including safe and sustainable transport and infrastructure. Gender equality must be central - including addressing violence against women and girls, and guaranteeing sexual and reproductive health and rights - as should ensuring peace, security and state-building in fragile states. The framework must include zero-targets on universal access to equitable healthcare, quality education, water and sanitation, and food and nutrition security. Any future framework must redefine the current notion of a global partnership from an inequitable relationship between donor and partner country governments into a global partnership for development cooperation that is equitable and inclusive of all development actors. This partnership must reaffirm civil society organizations as independent development actors in their own right, promote minimum standards for an enabling environment for CSOs, include their full, meaningful, informed and sustained participation, and ensure that those most affected by poverty and exclusion have a space to voice their perspectives and influence outcomes. It must ensure ownership of this process by including civil society formally in any and all negotiations pre and post-2015, and promote consensus-based decision-making. The framework must prioritize the needs of the Least Developed Countries (LDCs), Small Island Developing States (SIDS), Landlocked Developing Countries, and Fragile and Conflict Affected States in any future framework, taking into account their special requirements, and recognizing that all countries have common but differentiated responsibilities. Climate justice and sustainable management of the planets resources must be at the center of the framework, and must ensure that any public financing for development guarantees both financial additionality and development additionality to promote positive and sustainable development impacts. The means of implementation must support the achievement of democratically determined human development objectives. To tackle long-term structural imbalances and help achieve development goals, international trade rules and policies must be brought in line with socially

17|P a g e

inclusive and environmentally sustainable development. The one-size-fits-all approach to economic and trade policy does not allow states the space to determine their own development strategies. The new framework must include international measures to ensure commodity prices are stabilized at levels enabling adequate incomes for the countries and producers; it should eliminate trade-distorting agricultural subsidies in developed countries; it should allow a safeguard mechanism to protect local farmers and small and medium-sized enterprises. The framework must mandate comprehensive and participatory audits of debts owed by developing countries. Progressive taxation is a sustainable source of funding for public services that moves beyond the aid dependency paradigm. Domestic resource mobilization must be enabled through changes to international tax regulation. Existing commitments on quantity and quality of aid must be met. Loan-based forms of development cooperation should not be used to deliver financing commitments. Climate finance must be public, obligatory, predictable, grantbased, and free from conditionalities. It must be additional to the other financial obligations of developed countries. The widespread democratic deficit, which is evident at the local, national and international levels, results in the exclusion of the majority of citizens around the world from key decision-making processes that affect them. Civil society groups strongly urge decision-makers to embed global governance in the post-2015 development framework by institutionalizing democratic participation and accountability to citizens at all levels; developing new models of governance based on the principles of equality, justice and human rights; and promoting better conditions for civil society to engage as development partners, while also enhancing and protecting optimal standards for civil society. Ensuring universal access to social protection is a human right and a direct and efficient way of achieving equality. Global and regional institutions should support governments in investing in universal social protection by implementing the social protection floor as a basic right of all people, regardless of the sector they work in. While social protection remains the responsibility of governments, a Global Fund for Social Protection should be established to introduce or strengthen social protection floors in the poorest countries. There should be an inclusive framework for ensuring income and job security for all peoples, including those in the informal sector. This includes realizing full employment and decent work for all, and reinforcing and universalizing international labor standards. Womens rights and gender equalities must be prioritized specifically and throughout the post2015 framework. It is critical that the framework commits to end structural violence against women and girls embedded in patriarchy, feudalism, and capitalism, while promoting the democratic empowerment of women at home, in their communities, nationally and internationally. Governance starts at home, with women making decisions over their own bodies, sexualities and

18|P a g e

lives - sexual and reproductive rights are fundamental and must be guaranteed, while laws and policies that discriminate on the basis of sex, sexual orientation and gender identity must be repealed. The framework must ensure womens rights to and control over land, property, intellectual and productive resources, and information and technology, while promoting fair asset distribution among different social groups. There must be guarantees of womens decent work and a living wage, including the right to social protection, and transformative and progressive womens leadership and decision-making at all levels. Conclusion Civil society wants to engage in a new development framework that it believes will support the poor and marginalized. framework. We call on the HLP report to set a visionary tone in line with a moral obligation to correct the repeated failures in addressing the critical sustainable development challenges facing the world. 3.2. Thematic Statements Civil society must not merely be consulted, but engaged as an equal partner in all political processes to co-determine a bold, transformative and people-centered

The statement on vision and priorities Vision

We want a just, peaceful, equitable and sustainable world where every person is safe, resilient, and enjoys their human rights, dignity, equality and a good quality of life. We want a world where political, economic and social systems deliver human happiness and well-being based on fair sharing of limited planetary resources and a world committed to social justice and inclusion. We want a world that ensures that all people are empowered to participate in decision-making that affects their lives and that guarantees democracy, accountability, and transparency at all levels.

Priorities (the Essential Must Haves in the Post-2015 framework)

Full employment and decent work for all Universal social protection Equitable access and good governance of energy and natural resources. Building livelihood resilient to climate change and adhere to low carbon development pathways Equitable, universal and affordable access to health care Quality education for all, based on a broader and holistic lifelong learning approach Universal access to water and particularly sanitation

19|P a g e

Safe and sustainable transport and infrastructures State building, ensuring peace and security, especially in fragile states Food security and nutrition for all Gender Equality, including addressing violence against women and guaranteeing sexual and reproductive health and rights Eradicating all forms of violence, especially violence against women and children

Priority groups
The Post-2015 framework should follow a twin track approach by both mainstreaming and put special focus on the following vulnerable, marginalized and disadvantaged groups throughout all goals. These groups should specifically include: Girls and women Indigenous/ tribal groups Religious and ethnic minorities People with disability Marginalized cast groups Children, and specially children without parental care Youth and adolescents People living in remote areas People living in conflict and disasters prone and affected areas People discriminated against based on sexual and gender identity People living with HIV/AIDS and other diseases generating stigma Elderly Migrant workers Stateless People

To ensure accountability of all actors towards these groups, it is essential to collect and judge progress through disaggregated data. To ensure the completion and success of these goals and to ensure that these groups are effectively reached, it is essential that resources are secure as means of implementation both at the national and international level.

20|P a g e

The statement on global partnerships

An end to patterns of unsustainable growth and consumption, which are deeply embedded

within current and predominant frameworks for development, requires a shift towards a transformative development paradigm. This paradigm recognizes our collective planetary boundaries, is guided by sustainable development goals, and is led by an inclusive global partnership, democratically owned by all development stakeholders, including civil society and peoples organizations. To truly address the pressing issues of global inequality, social and economic inclusion, environmental sustainability, and peace and security, any future framework must redefine the current practices of development cooperation, premised on inequitable donor partner country relations, into a global partnership for development cooperation that is truly equitable and inclusive. An equitable global partnership for a transformative development agenda requires the following actions: 1) Promote full, meaningful, informed and sustained participation of CSOs in ongoing multistakeholder dialogue around the Post-2015 development framework in the lead up to, and following, 2015; 2) Reaffirm and relate to civil society organizations as independent development actors in their own right, involved in development initiatives, policy engagement and democratic practice; 3) Implement the means to ensure that those most affected by poverty and exclusion have opportunities to voice their perspectives and influence outcomes; 4) Beyond consultation, ensure democratic ownership of this process by formally including civil society in all its diversity in any and all negotiations, promoting consensus-based decisionmaking around the post-2015 framework, and in any future formal post-2015 accountability structure there is already precedence for this within other multilateral fora. Secondly, while we acknowledge that no country is immune to the challenges of social and economic inequality, the Least Developed Countries (LDCs), Small Island Developing States (SIDS), Land-Locked Developing Countries, and Fragile and Conflict Affected States, continue to suffer disproportionately from the impacts of the global economic, food and climate crises, due to inherent geographical and environmental vulnerabilities. To address these major global injustices, a new global partnership must do the following: 1) Prioritize the needs of these countries in any future sustainable development framework, taking into account and giving priority to their special requirements, in particular with respect to future public financing for development;

21|P a g e

2) Recognize that all countries have common, but differentiated, responsibilities, and negotiate and implement development agreements accordingly; 3) Ensure that climate justice, based on these principles of common, but differentiated responsibilities, is at the core of a new development framework, and to this end, developed countries have a special responsibility to actively reduce their emissions, consumption and production patterns, while all countries move towards policies and practices that sustainably manage the planets natural resources. Lastly, aid flows are decreasing in real terms (constant prices) and as a proportion of other global financial flows. Donors have failed to meet many of their commitments to aid effectiveness from the High Level Forums in Paris and Accra. Finally, moving forward, a renewed global partnership must move away from an exclusive emphasis on aid effectiveness, to a vision for development framed and informed by the need for improving the development effectiveness of all development cooperation resources. For CSOs, development effectiveness is linked to multifaceted human and social development processes, directly involving and empowering people living in poverty and discriminated and marginalized populations, and that address the root causes, as well as the symptoms, of poverty, inequality and marginalization. To address development effectiveness, a new global partnership must: 1) Ensure that any public financing for development, in particular official development assistance, guarantees both financial additionality (provides resources for initiatives, which would not be available otherwise) and development additionality (promotes positive development impacts for people living in poverty, discriminated and marginalized populations); and 2) Provide, promote and monitor an enabling environment for CSOs, consistent with international human rights standards, which maximize their contributions to development.

The statement on means of Implementation

The new MDG framework should ensure human rights, basic needs, and dignity for all. We urge the High Level Panel to scale this down to achievable targets, and make appropriate in terms of priority and diversity of responsibilities. We stress that the responsibility for the implementation of any Post-2015 goals should be on member states and governments, while considering support from the global policy and financial regimes. Moreover, the new MDGs must also put in place a regulatory framework to govern all policy implementations - which had been previously neglected in MDG 8.

22|P a g e

A just Means of Implementation should stress the following aspects:

Capability includes exploring effective development financing mechanisms, introduction of

appropriate technology and enabling skilled capacity for quality delivery of outcomes.

Accountability includes time-bound delivery and transparency to achieve minimum set

standards and enforcement of mandatory regulatory systems to sanction gross misconduct of all duty bearers and institutional agencies.

Responsiveness - includes inclusion of all vulnerable and disabled communities both directly
and indirectly affected within the constituency, dignity of all individual and community rights, respect on the diversity of cultural identities and consent gained from communities at the grassroots before any initiative.

Debt
Developing countries must be given the capacity to mobilize domestic resources for development. This would be impossible if debt payments are continuously imposed, especially to the most marginalized countries. Debt servicing in the face of urgent needs for survival, for basic services, for genuine economic and sustainable development and for addressing the environmental and climate crises, is a form of injustice. Thus, we recommend the following to strengthen the MDG goal of dealing with the debt problems of the Global South: Comprehensive and participatory debt audits should be conducted on debts claimed from the Global South by the developed countries Immediate cancellation and repudiation of debts illegitimately owed. Undertake reparations and restitutions for social, historical and ecological debt owed to all exploited and marginalized peoples by the developed countries, international financial institutions and private corporations Financial responses to the current climate, energy, food and economic crisis should not be in the form of loans and must not promote new mechanisms of indebtedness Lending and borrowing policies, mechanisms and practices must be challenged and transformed towards sovereign, democratic, and responsible financing

23|P a g e

Trade
Commodity exporting countries face complex problems from price volatility to corporate control. There should be international measures to ensure commodity prices are stabilized at levels enabling adequate incomes for the countries and producers. Making trade as a development goal is an imperative. Inappropriate import liberalization policies have caused declines in or threats to industrial jobs, peoples livelihoods and access to basic services in many countries in the South. These are mostly due to external policy influences resulting from loan conditionalities and multilateral and bilateral trade agreements. The state should ensure that it sets the pace of liberalization, promote safeguard mechanisms that protect local farmers and small and medium scale enterprises, and eliminate agricultural subsidies in developed countries. Duty-Free Quota-Free access for least developing countries should also be promoted. We urge the review of Free Trade Agreement/s (FTA), especially on investments and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), because these jeopardize development goals. The review of IPR policies is necessary to make full use of the flexibilities in the Trade Related Aspects of intellectual Property Rights (TRIPs) to pursue development goals in technology, knowledge, food security and food sovereignty, access to health etc. Corollary to the above, because the 9th WTO Ministerial Meeting will be in this same island in December 2013, a set of CSO calls are being formulated that highlights, among others: a call for WTO Members to unconditionally accord the LDC Group an extension of the transition period to enforce intellectual property protection measures, as requested by the LDC Group in the TRIPs Council.

Aid
Aid commitments from developed countries remain a crucial component for the development of the Global South, including the development of the LDCs. We urge that the Monterey Consensus and Doha Declaration on Financing for Development be put into tangible outcomes. Developed countries must fulfill their commitments. We urge the HLP to include the following in the Post 2015 Development Agenda: Developed countries should make a consensus on ODA allocation, specifically for the achievements of the agreed development goals. Aid modalities should be aligned with national and local governance mechanisms for effective implementation in the achievement of development goals.

24|P a g e

There should be coherence between international mechanisms and national mechanisms for financing to ensure predictability of development financing.

Climate finance
Financial reparations for Climate and Ecological Debt should be paid by the Global North to the people of the South not only for dealing with present and future impacts of climate change, but also for shifting to sustainable systems. Thus, it is imperative for the HLP to include the following actions in the post 2015 Development Agenda: Urge the Global North to ensure the mobilization of $ 100 billion Climate Finance for the year 2020. All funds must come through the GCF and should not be channeled through international financial institutions and the private sector. The nature of Climate Finance must be obligatory, automatic and predictable and must be of a Public nature direct contributions from governments of the North and international taxes. It should not be in the form of loans or any other debt-creating instruments nor these should be accompanied by conditionalities. Climate Finance must also be over and above other financial commitments and obligations of developed countries. The allocation and use of Climate Finance must uphold the sovereign right of peoples and recipient countries in determining allocation and use of funds. It should be based on state obligations to develop sustainable, equitable and people-centered plans, programs and actions, must be transparent and should follow just and effective accountability mechanisms.

Tax
Developing countries lose an estimated $160 billion annually to tax evasion and avoidance, more than the 2008 ODA of $120 billion. This comparison does not suggest that tax replaces aid, but emphasizes that it is an essential part of the ever-growing need for development financing. Taxation is a significant source of post-2015 development finance. Domestic resource mobilization is a feasible and sustainable way to raise financing to provide essential social services such as education and health. Taxation is key for effective, accountable and transparent governance. It is a social contract between citizens and government that promotes fiscal transparency. Good enforcement provides predictability for business. It puts developing countries in the drivers seat of their own development.

25|P a g e

Taxation is a tool for reducing inequality, domestically and globally. Tax can be a means of redistribution at the global, national and sub-national levels. Progressive taxation can directly reduce income inequality and other inequalities such as between women and men.

What is keeping developing countries from raising revenues from tax? Illicit financial flows, various forms of tax dodging including transfer pricing, unhealthy tax competition, financial secrecy and tax havens, weak international rules and regulations relating to tax and financial flows, weak national capacities Thus we call on the HLP on the Post-2015 development agenda: To ensure that developing countries have the ability to devise and implement sustainable financing for development solutions. a. To ensure that international treaties and agreements but also regional and bilateral agreements safeguard developing countries taxing rights on cross-border income and capital. b. To increase transparency and exchange of information including in tax havens and companies c. To support countries in building regional agreements to address tax competition and excessive tax incentives To set targets aimed at supporting the development of effective and transparent taxation systems. a. To increase aid for building capacities of developing countries to develop strong progressive tax policies, effective tax authorities and revenue collection systems. b. To reach universal domestic resource targets: corporate tax take, tax/GDP ratio, c. To incentivize allocation to sustainable development goals and greater budget transparency

Delivery Mechanism for Means of Implementation of a Post-2015 Agenda

The global architecture for overseeing implementation of the post-2015 development framework must be strengthened, should be more transparent and better coordinated. This requires different development actors to each make concrete commitments to working together more effectively towards commonly agreed global goals.

26|P a g e

Multilateral and international institutions and recipient governments and organizations: Coordination the Post 2015 framework should create an independent coordinating body to
organize global efforts in mobilizing international development aid, identifying priorities and setting up guidelines for the delivery and monitoring of this aid. This body should comprise of all stakeholders including donor and recipient countries, civil society and private sector.

Transparency and Accountability (1) Donor and recipient countries and agencies, corporations and institutions involved in
international development should be answerable: specifically, ensuring transparent and timely reporting of activities, investments, and transactions to a coordinating body in order to hold each other mutually accountable for progress and results achieved.

(2) Enforceability of sanctions: there should be a mechanism of redress if particular actions taken
by institutions fail to meet objectives and lead to violations of commitments made in the Post MDG 2015 (clearly neglected in MDG 8, especially on MDBs and IFIs in cases of large scale projects and policy failures). As a result, a comprehensive and binding regulatory framework with capacity to sanction politically, legally and financially as absolutely essential to rightful implementation and delivery of Post MDG objectives.

Equitable representation in decision making balanced, regional and geographic participation in

decision-making, especially more involvement from developing countries and incorporating the voices and influence of civil society.

Monitoring Mechanisms There is a need to develop monitoring mechanisms to measure

progress, successes and identify failures at early stages of implementation. civil society organizations. This should be developed in consultation with research institutions and thematic and sectoral experts, as well as

Inclusiveness Need to develop policies and models to ensure that least developed countries and
poor and marginalized groups including women, youth, the poor, LGBT, people with disabilities, the elderly and indigenous people are beneficiaries of international development.

Private Sector involvement in international development Role of Governments - Governments should not rely on private sector involvement in
international development as a substitute for bilateral or multilateral development aid. Setting up development priorities should continue being the responsibility of governments, while private sector can be involved in the implementation and financing of these priorities.

27|P a g e

Role of the private sector There is a need to challenge and transform guidelines and specific
policies for the delivery of aid through private sector and private-public partnerships. These should be pro-poor, respectful of workers rights and environmentally responsible as well as ensuring oversight mechanisms such as multi-stakeholder social audits.

Development Agenda HLP should develop mechanisms for the role of private sector in
development: no misuse of developmental funds, market mechanism for private business, aid finance does not go into capitalizing private business and that civil society mechanisms are not instruments for profiteering.

Beyond CSR corporate sector needs to become more socially engaged and responsible in
development settings; it needs to develop socially and environmentally responsible business models upholding commitments to human rights, labor rights and social security;

The statement on global governace and accountability

The widespread democratic deficit, which is evident at the local, national and international levels, results in the exclusion of the majority of citizens around the world from key decision-making processes affecting them. Civil society groups strongly urge decision makers to embed global governance in the Post-2015 development framework by institutionalizing democratic participation and accountability to citizens at all levels; developing new models of governance based on the principles of equality, justice and human rights; and promoting better conditions for civil society to engage as development partners, while also enhancing and protecting optimal standards for civil society.

Democratic Participation and Accountability

The Post-2015 development framework needs to provide mechanisms for broad and inclusive citizen participation in determining, implementing and monitoring development goals and indicators. It also needs to take into account barriers to participation, such as cultural obstacles. Such participation must involve women, youth, indigenous communities, people with disabilities, grassroots movements and marginalized groups, among others. Democratic governance should be embedded in the framework and underpinned with effective and transformative accountability mechanisms that promote transparency and compliance at all levels, and empower citizens to hold those in power to account for their commitments.

Equality, Justice and Human Rights

New models for global governance must be based on principles of equality, justice and human rights where those who are most affected are at the center of development decisions. Human development in the Post-2015 era needs to be defined through the lens of the Universal

28|P a g e

Declaration of Human Rights, which gives equal priority to civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights. Goals and indicators should look beyond the dominant economic growth model and consider issues such as inequalities within and between countries and discriminatory practices based on income, ethnicity, religion, gender and age, among others.

Promotion and Protection of Space for Civil Society

The Post-2015 development framework needs to promote an environment that allows civil society to engage effectively in development processes in line with agreed international rights and commitments made at the Rio+20 Summit and the Busan High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness. This includes access to justice and information; freedom of assembly and association; as well as important enabling factors such as quality education, decent employment and living conditions. Furthermore, civil society should be formally recognized as a development partner in the Post2015 framework, and financing should be made available directly to civil society. Civil societys role and responsibilities, as well as those of partners in the public and private sectors, should be clearly defined and there should be mechanisms for evaluating all development partnerships to enable citizens to be served better.

The statement on informal economy and inclusion

Issues of informality affect the majority of the developing worlds population. Exclusion remains pervasive in the informal economy prevents the eradication of poverty, access to Decent Work and Social Protection. It also prevents the global development community from realizing aspirations laid out in the Millennium Development Goals. In this light, the successor framework to the MDGs and Recommendations of the HLP should look to address the informal economy and inclusion. Systematic exclusion and discrimination are the root of poverty and marginalization. The

international human rights framework is not being applied universally. Lack of social and legal recognition means many of those working in the informal sector are denied their basic rights. This includes street vendors, motorbike and some other transport workers, traditional fisher folk, small producers, home based workers, sex workers, domestic workers, unpaid care workers, smallscale farmers, migrant workers and others. The following are recommendations from the Informal Economy and Inclusion roundtable: The new framework must be grounded in a human rights based approach to development. The current system has failed to address the issue of the informal economy Fundamental recognition of the informal economy and the associated disadvantages at both national and global levels is the first step to creating greater inclusion

29|P a g e

Universal Social Protection is an imperative and a Human Right and directly seeks to overcome the disadvantages associated with informality, be it through income security, access to healthcare or access to education. Social protection needs to extend to all, no matter the nature of the work, especially the most vulnerable.

Full Employment and Decent Work for All will address the root causes of exclusion which go hand in hand with the informal economy. social dialogue This means creating spaces for organizing and

Affirmative actions to empower people with disabilities and ageing populations to participate in the formal economy. Addressing inequality is fundamental to overcoming economic and social exclusion. Women make up the majority of the informal economy. In many instances, the informal economy engages in competition even with the formal economy. However, this is one of the greatest challenges for people earning their livelihoods in the informal economy are competing in an unequal competitive environment as a result of the associated disadvantages especially in terms of access to protection. For example, the entry of large scales commercial supermarkets into a formerly traditional market setting. Therefore, we should go beyond market-based economic thinking towards a civil market economic system that provides some benefits.

Implementation is the key.

Even where legislation and regulations are in place,

implementation, compliance and enforcement is often very weak. Looking at innovative ways for people in the informal economy to organize into unions, associations and cooperatives, and fostering small enterprises and enhancing competitive and productive capacity at this level. Ensuring universal access to social protection is a human right and a direct and efficient way of achieving equality. Global and regional institutions should support governments in investing in universal social protection by implementing the social protection floor as a basic right of all people, regardless of the sector they work in. While social protection remains the responsibility of governments, a Global Fund for Social Protection should be established to introduce or strengthen social protection floors in the poorest countries. sector. There should be an inclusive framework for ensuring income and job security for all peoples, including those in the informal This includes realizing full employment and decent work for all, and reinforcing and universalizing international labor standards.

The statement from women thematic group

There will be no development; there will be no progress, unless there is a clear and uncompromising commitment to women's rights and gender equality and justice. The Post-2015 agenda must be based on the principle of non-regression and firmly rooted in human rights obligations and commitments from the UN conferences of the 1990s and their follow-ups, which

30|P a g e

are yet to be fully implemented. As women we say a "promise is a promise" and we demand that these promises now are kept. We insist on a new development paradigm that is based on principles of human rights, equality and redistributive justice. The international community must commit to real reforms of the monetary, financial and trade regimes that perpetuate inequalities and violence and undermine women and girls' human rights. Global macroeconomic structures must be coherent with governments human rights obligations. Governments, private philanthropy organizations, investors, micro finance institutions and transnational corporations must be held accountable to human rights, to principles of equality and equity, non-discrimination, and environmental sustainability norms and standards. We demand new models of global partnership that are truly democratic, non-exploitative and sustainable and where women, girls and those most affected have the greatest voice. The current development model, which gives corporations control over our natural wealth, water and resources, as well as technology and intellectual property, while depriving women of land and food sovereignty, undermines gender equality, sends communities into conflict with governments, increases militarization, and women's vulnerability to violence and economic shock. This must change. The new development framework must recognize that patriarchal systems and practices are a major impediment for development. Ending violence against women and girls and promoting democratic empowerment and leadership of women at home, in the community, nationally and internationally is a fundamental prerequisite for womens rights enjoyment, gender equality, sustainable development and genuine democracy. Rising fundamentalisms that manifest in attempts to control womens bodies and freedoms must be countered. Governments must never use cultural, traditional or religious values to avoid their obligations to respect, protect and fulfill the full range of women's human rights and prevent and address violence. Women and girls' rights to bodily autonomy and integrity are fundamental to our ability to enjoy other human rights. No form of violence impeding on womens and girls' bodily integrity should be tolerated and no limitation of our rights to make our own informed sexual and reproductive choices should be accepted. We demand that the Post-2015 development agenda aims to fairly redistribute wealth, power and resources to achieve social, economic, ecological, and gender justice, rather than be driven by donors and the corporate sector. It must include means of implementation that prioritize public financing over public-private partnerships in order to realize state obligations to allocate the maximum available resources to economic and social services.

31|P a g e

Gender inequalities must be understood and addressed from an intersectional approach and the Post-2015 development framework must recognize how factors such as age, race, caste, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, poverty, migration status, and location can compound stigma, discrimination, social exclusion and marginalization and lead to violence, as well as other violations of women's rights. Specific attention is needed to address the violence and rights violations faced by girls, adolescent and young women, women human rights defenders, lesbian, bisexual, transgender and queer women, indigenous women, rural women, sex workers, women with disabilities, women living with HIV, women working in conflict and militarized contexts, women migrant workers, displaced women, women from language minorities and women who use drugs, among others. We demand the new development framework includes a dedicated gender equality goal, as well as specific targets and indicators that are integrated throughout the framework. It is critical that the Post-2015 agenda commit to: 1) End all forms of gender-based violence, including intimate partner violence and sexual violence and address its intersections with HIV infection. Set targets to reduce militarization and conflict by limiting military budgets. 2) Guarantee sexual and reproductive rights as fundamental human rights, along with women's and girls' universal access to quality, comprehensive and integrated sexual and reproductive health services, including contraceptives, safe abortion, prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections and HIV, and safe maternity care; 3) Include specific goals for reducing inequalities of wealth, power and resources between countries, between rich and poor, between men and women; 4) Ensure womens rights to and control over land, property, including intellectual property, productive resources, information and technology, and promote fair asset distribution among different social groups; 5) Guarantee womens economic independence including by ensuring that women have access to decent work including legal protection for sex workers and domestic workers, a living wage that enables women to live with dignity, and affordable child care; 6) Recognize women's role in the care economy and ensure their rights to social protection and the equal distribution of paid and unpaid work; 7) Guarantee investments in public services such as in child care, education and elderly care in order to eliminate the sexual division of labor;

32|P a g e

8)

Guarantee womens rights to participate in leadership and decision-making at all levels, including in economic and social development and international financial institutions;

9)

Repeal laws and policies that discriminate on the basis of gender; criminalize or marginalize specific groups of women based on their sexual orientation, gender identity, participation in sex work, or other status; or erect barriers to services, and adopt measures to counter discriminatory practices and ensure womens access to justice; and

10) Guarantee universal access by women and girls to quality education throughout the life course, including comprehensive sexuality education and education on human rights, gender equality and environmental sustainability, and ensure womens and girls literacy. Sustainable development must fully be integrated into the Post-2015 framework, building on existing commitments. Women's role in responding to climate change, protecting and safeguarding the environment, ensuring sustainable agriculture and food sovereignty must also be recognized. Innovative, democratic financing mechanisms that allocate specific resources to womens rights and gender equality must be a priority. Women must be involved in the development and monitoring of budgets at all levels. The Post-2015 agenda must ensure that women-led systems of monitoring and accountability are built into the framework, with clear and time-bound commitments. Data must be disaggregated based on age, sex, and other status important to identify, make visible and respond to inequalities. Mechanisms of data collection and analysis for monitoring the new framework must be transparent and inclusive of input from womens groups. National mechanisms, such as judiciaries, parliaments, and national human rights institutions, should be empowered to oversee implementation of the Post-2015 framework and allow for women's access to justice when commitments are not met. The Post-2015 development framework must hold governments accountable for their duty to exercise oversight over and regulate private actors, especially corporate and private financial actors to guarantee they respect womens human rights, including in their cross-border activities. The UN system must also be held to account for their role in promoting and protecting women's rights, including by bringing pressure to bear on governments to implement their human rights obligations. The United Nations and Member States must address in an integrated way the obstacles to gender equality at global, national, and local levels. Rather than remaining centered on the distribution of dwindling aid funds or the effective incorporation of the private sector, the Post-

33|P a g e

2015 framework must provide clear guidelines on how to respond to the multiple crises that affect women globally, particularly in the global South. To enable a transformative global partnership, the vital role of womens movements must be recognized. Resources must be directed to feminist movement building and advocacy to ensure equality, human rights, democratic governance, and transformative change and development for all. 3.3. Sectoral Statements

The common statement

We, as members of global, national, and local Civil Society, are raising our concerns about the lack and limited voices and participation of the people from the marginalized sectors of the society in the current process of setting the Post-2015 Development Agenda. This lack of participation has shown us that there is a need for a new paradigm and strategies to address the problem of inequalities, social inclusion and discrimination that hinders these members of societies to enjoy their rights and well-being. We believe that the people who will benefit from the new global development agenda should be the one whose interests and voices are being heard, whose participation is being counted for and whose access to achievements of development is being ensured. We are therefore insisting that there should be a principle of transparency and an indicator for participation across the goals. We also believe that the people of the future, in addressing the problems of the marginalized sectors, should have better social cohesion and social values that will help them to be resilient in times of crisis. This question should be addressed by the vision and goals of the Post-2015 Development Agenda

The statement from Indigenous Peoples, ethnic minorities, Dalits and other socially excluded groups
The current development paradigm has victimized and excluded the Indigenous peoples, ethnic minorities, Dalits, and other socially excluded groups. Land grabbing, displacements, violence and destruction of livelihood continue to persist. Many states have not even recognized our existence, rights, values, cultures and contributions to development. We continue to suffer from extreme and inter-generational poverty. The collective rights of indigenous peoples under the UN Declaration of Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) continue to be denied by many states. It is abhorrent that the practice of Untouchability against Dalits and those affected by discrimination based on work and descent still continues across Asia, Africa, North, South Americas and Europe.

34|P a g e

We therefore strongly urge the HLP to consider these concerns within the framework of Human Rights, Social inclusion and Sustainability underling the principles of non-discrimination and substantive equality; and with Culture as the 4th pillar for sustainable development. We therefore strongly recommend: Legislative and institutional mechanisms to recognize the economic, social, cultural and political rights of Indigenous peoples, Ethnic minorities, Dalits and other socially excluded groups Mechanisms to ensure recognition and protection of the collective rights of indigenous peoples to land, territories and resources and other rights under the UNDRIP (UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples) Strengthen institutional responses and access to justice to prevent and eliminate caste based discrimination and violence by both state as well as non-state actors. Enact cultural and intercultural sensitive policies at the national level especially in the areas of education, health and other basic services Collect disaggregated data and specific indicators for holistic wellbeing of indigenous peoples, ethnic minorities Dalits and other socially excluded groups. Implement rights to free and prior informed consent of indigenous peoples, establish mechanisms to ensure full and effective participation of indigenous peoples, ethnic minorities and Dalits in all stages of development. Ensure proportional allocation, access and utilization of state budgets and resources including access to credit and other financing mechanisms for culturally appropriate development initiatives for, by and with the indigenous peoples, Ethnic Minorities, Dalits and other socially excluded groups. Ensure budget transparency, participation and accountability in all development and welfare measures especially targeting indigenous peoples, Ethnic Minorities, Dalits and other socially excluded groups. Establish and strengthen equal partnerships for development including promoting green economies at all levels based on trust and respect for the rights of indigenous peoples, Ethnic Minorities, Dalits and other socially excluded groups. Prioritize in all aspect of development, the specific conditions and needs of women, youth, children and persons with dis-abilities amongst indigenous peoples, Ethnic Minorities, Dalits and other socially excluded groups.

35|P a g e

The statement from women, LBT, Victims and Survivor of Gender base violence
Women represent 70% of the worlds poor, and up to 90% of domestic workers. The vast majority of illiterate people are women and women continue to experience inequalities in access to quality education. One in every three women globally will experience violence at some point in her life. Access to sexual and reproductive health services and knowledge, including on sexual orientation, are still a distant reality, resulting in unsafe abortions, HIV infections, and maternal mortality. Two hundred and twenty million women worldwide do not have access to contraception. Progress in addressing infant mortality is slow. Childrens rights protection and fulfillment are yet to get adequate attention, and numerous children lack access to education, nutrition, and are subject to violence. The current paradigm of development , that focus on economy growth and market liberalization, has had extremely negative impacts on the worlds women especially the most marginalized, such as peasants, fisher-folk, migrant workers, sex workers, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender women, among others. Womens political leadership and representation remains tokenistic, Women still face barriers in accessing justice and legal aid. focusing on quantity, not quality.

Discriminatory laws and policy still exist, some countries still criminalize LGBT and Sex Worker, those that promote gender equality and womens rights are weakly enforced and fulfilled. The Millennium Development Goals have failed to address structural inequalities that underpin womens poverty and marginalization. Persistent corruption coupled with a lack of accountability and transparency have led to the failure of the MDGs and resulted in impoverishment. The Post2015 development framework must implement transparency, effective accountability mechanisms that include womens participation, and equitable financing for development, including gender budgeting, must be integral to this framework. Transformative global partnership must devote resources to womens movements, in recognition of their key role in advancing womens human rights and gender equality. Achieving womens empowerment and transformative leadership is critical. Women must be able to make decisions over their own bodies, sexuality and lives. Democratic governance depends on the political participation of women, especially rural, indigenous, migrant and other marginalized women, in decision-making at all levels.

36|P a g e

The Post-2015 Framework should: Set indicators and targets based on the principles of gender justice and equality, human rights, transparency, anti corruption, and fulfillment of the right to public information. The Post-2015 development framework must be transformative and reduce inequalities in wealth, power and resources between and within countries, between rich and poor, and between women and men The new framework must include means of implementation that prioritize public financing rather than private investment, to realize state obligations to allocate the maximum available resources to economic and social services Commit to inclusive social protection and ensure universal access to basic services for all, including health, education and access to justice. Guarantee access to sexual and reproductive health services, information and education, including safe abortion services, contraceptives, diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections and HIV/AIDS, and maternity care. Commit to a 50% quota for women in all levels of public and political representation and increase womens empowerment, political skill and knowledge. Commit to ending gender-based violence, protect, and empower victims and survivors of violence. Create an enabling environment for womens movements, including dedicated funding, and enable grassroots women to participate. Developed countries should have the commitment to just and sustainable development, especially in natural and human resources management. Developing countries and Least Developed Countries should be together in solidarity. For example, by making a common agreement to a gender-just sustainable development. There will be no development; there will be no progress, unless there is a clear and uncompromising commitment to womens rights and gender equality and justice. As women, we say a promise is a promise and we demand that the promises that have been made are now kept.

37|P a g e

The statement from urban poor, worker, and unemployed

Urban Poor
More people these days live in urban areas. Over 90 percent of urban growth is occurring in the developing world, adding an estimated 70 million new residents to urban areas each year, and this trend continues. During the next two decades, the urban population of the worlds two poorest regionsSouth Asia and Sub-Saharan Africais expected to double. The urban poor face many challenges due to the context in which they are in are dependent on cash economy and low-paid employment without job security, poor and unsafe working condition. They live in a condition with lack of basic services, including health and education, water and sanitation. The majority of them live in unsafe physical environment that put them in vulnerable position in facing climate change and disasters. Denial of legal and political rights faced by many urban poor all over the world exacerbate this situation. To address urban poverty, we call for the recognition of the legal status of urban poor and the protection of the rights of poor urban people as citizens, by giving special attention to marginalized and vulnerable groups (women, children, LGBT, people with disability and the elderly), including protecting these groups against violence and discrimination; the protection and fulfillment of the rights of urban poor towards the right to livelihoods, adequate housing, clean water and sanitation, quality health and education, accessible, safe and affordable public transportation, and clean and healthy environment. urban poor participation in decision making related to urban development and spatial planning.

Workers and the Unemployed

In particular to improve the situation of the workers and the fulfillment of labor rights, we ask for a commitment from all parties for safe and decent work in all lines of works and for all, including for women, men, people with disability, and LGBT workers, both in formal and informal sectors, including domestic and sex workers. Within the decent work, we would like to see that all workers receive a living wage that ensures food security for the workers and their families, and their ability to access basic services. We urge the government and the private sector to provide social protection for all workers and their families. To ensure the fulfillment of these rights, it is important that workers right to association is respected and protected. Furthermore, we are of the view that there should be strong monitoring of the implementation of labor laws and regulations.

38|P a g e

Whilst we are striving for the world without unemployment, in the current economic condition, we see the rise of global unemployment, and we would like to see that these people have access to social protection without discrimination in all forms. They should also be given other options and opportunities to access independent and creative job creation, with protection and support from the state. These include access to capital or financing, business permit, capacity building for entrepreneurship development, and access to markets. Within the world of employment, we are concerned that there are still many children involved as laborers. We strongly call for the eradication of all forms of child employment. To conclude we believe that the eradication of urban poverty and the protection of labor rights can only be achieved by putting the urban poor and labors at the centre and as agents of change supported by global partnership.

The statement from children, persons with disabilities and ageing

1. Persons with disabilities and elderly people are totally excluded from the MDGs. It is essential that they are fully included across all goals and targets in the Post-2015 framework. This requires disaggregated data to ensure that inequalities are monitored and reduced. 2. Whilst the MDGs mention infant mortality and education, many other dimensions of child rights are ignored, for example on participation and protection. This must be addressed in the Post-2015 framework. 3. Information that is accessible to vulnerable children, persons with disabilities and elderly people is critical for them to hold powerful actors accountable. 4. Vulnerable children, persons with disabilities and elderly people must be actively supported to engage in Post-2015 accountability mechanisms and processes. 5. Social protection floors and wider development interventions must prioritize and include vulnerable children, persons with disabilities and elderly people. 6. The Post-2015 framework must ensure comprehensive accessibility (i.e physical infrastructure, communication and technology and institutional) so that persons with disabilities enjoy their human rights to the fullest extent on an equal basis with others. 7. 8. States must support the creation of a Convention on the Rights of the Elderly. The Post-2015 framework must promote quality care for children in their families and alternative care, and build strong child protection systems.

39|P a g e

9.

Domestic and international financing and wider resource mobilization initiatives must focus on supporting vulnerable children, persons with disabilities and elderly people to achieve Post2015 goals.

10. Gender is a cross-cutting issue. Within the most marginalized groups, girls and women are particularly excluded. Data that is disaggregated by gender is also necessary in all goals and targets in the Post-2015 framework. 11. No target should be considered to have been met if children, persons with disabilities, elderly people and females are not proportionately represented amongst those who have met the target.

The statement from peasants, fisher-folk, pastoralist and coastal communities

We, the representatives of peasants, fisher folks and coastal community organizations from Asia, Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean, who participated in the two-day conference with the theme 'Strengthening the Global Community Voices', has bonded together to share experiences, our predicaments and daily struggle against the many issues that confronts us in our communities. In the process, we have identified major concerns that we would like to put across in this process with the hope that policy makers will listen to our voices and be included in the crafting of a framework for sustainable development.

The right to access to land, water and other resources.

Representatives from the three continental regions were in unison that many of us are inhumanely being displaced in our sources of livelihood, ancestral domains and communities, due to land and water grabbing, ocean grabbing and other forms of development aggression. Corporate projects like plantations for renewable energy, aquaculture, mono-crop plantations and others deprive this sector of regular and sustainable livelihoods, and destabilize and destroy biodiversity, including food systems. Many cases of human rights violations have been reported in communities where these rights are asserted.

Destructive corporate agricultural practices

Mono-cropping, the use of GMOs and toxic farm inputs, among other corporate agricultural practices, have long term destructive impacts not only on the livelihood of farming and fishing communities but also on biodiversity and the environment. Unfortunately, instead of protecting the small-scale food producers livelihoods and general welfare, cases where governments are protecting the interest of corporate farms and big fishing vessels are more prominent. Governments have failed to address the destruction of development aggression, particularly

40|P a g e

mining and dam projects that has displaced farming and fishing communities along with the environment.

The right to be given ample support and protection from government.

We believe that the state, bound by its responsibility as a duty bearer, must give preferential treatment to those who are feeding the world in a time of food crisis, and protect their rights and welfare against those who deny us of our main source of livelihood and policies

Climate Change
Climate change-related issues severely affect production and livelihood, further increasing vulnerability to disaster risks. Measures to mitigate impacts and support systems to adapt to climate change are often not available. Mono cropping, plantations and other corporate schemes in agriculture exacerbate the difficult conditions of farming communities. Rapid deforestation worsens disaster risks and deprives communities of additional income. At the onset of disasters, governments and other responders are unable to provide immediate and sufficient support to save properties, community livelihoods and livestock, eroding meager savings and incomes held by farming families.

Recommendations:
1. Ensure that CSOs are the interlocutor of the people and an important development actor be recognized process by having a permanent inclusive space with equal opportunity to participate in policy-making, budgeting processes, monitoring, implementation and evaluation. 2. States must provide adequate public funds for social security and social protection, including the basic social services needed by their communities. 3. Institutionalize policies that will defend the right to access on land, water and other resources, and insure that the rights of peasants, fisher-folks and other marginalized groups are upheld. 4. Develop and promote people's Food Sovereignty as the alternative platform against neoliberal globalization on food and agriculture policies. 5. Protect and promote traditional knowledge consistent with agro-ecology and the protection of the environment. 6. Promote sustainable agricultural production, which will prioritize domestic needs against corporate agricultural practices.

41|P a g e

7.

Ensure government support for capacity building and knowledge building along with the necessary tools of production.

The statement from human rights defenders, and democracy advocates We recognize that
Human rights defenders have specific disadvantages confronting human rights defenders related to region, religion, specific sections of population therefore, need Protection by law Acknowledge human rights defenders as a specific category that would need to be addressed by the post-2015 development frame

Take Action About

Call to HLP to eliminate barriers and abolish reprisals against human rights defenders who engage with national, regional and international systems and for this, there is a need to take necessary measures to protect human rights defenders guaranteed by law. Call for HLP to take measures to promote human rights defenders' role through human rights education and training of police, judiciary, and military.

Advocate for
'Enabling environment' for human rights defenders to do their work. For this, every state must protect human rights defenders in their country through affirmative legal mechanisms. Increase budgets towards human rights training and education of the police, judiciary, security. We urge the HLP to encourage states to establish a domestic mechanism to protect human rights defenders including creating complaint mechanisms /procedures, funds to rescue human rights defenders under risk, conduct fact-finding operations. Ensure national government's budget allocation towards protection of human rights defenders to ensure their safety, security and welfare.

42|P a g e

The statement from migrant Workers

For the last ten years, at least two hundred millions migrant workers in all over the world have been moving the worlds economy and bring advantages to our country and the countries where we work. Majority of us are women and work as domestic workers. We are in vulnerable condition. In this, we almost have no legal protection, even though we have contributed a lot, but our mobility has been limited with policies which are discriminative, exploitative, anti-migration, criminalization and put us as informal sector. Working abroad is our human rights that should be promoted, fulfilled and protected by the country of original and the country of destination. I am Siti Mariyam, been working as domestic worker in Hong Kong for 6 years and in Taiwan for 2 years. I experienced discriminated treatment just because I work as domestic workers even though i got protection in Hong Kong and Taiwan, my own country does not provide proper protection mechanism. Through this Forum I use the High Level Panel to ensure the protection for migrant workers, especially domestic workers in all over the world and inseparable from the Post-2015 development agenda. I demand states, both the country of origin and country of destination to take all necessary measures to provide legal protection for migrant domestic workers. State have to ensure that legal protection is based on UN and ILO conventions that are relevant for the protection of migrant workers. The international instruments/treaties are aiming at the abolition of dichotomy of formal informal and legal-illegal (documented-undocumented) workers. There is no development without the protection of migrant workers!

43|P a g e

IV.

THE CSOs ROUNDTABLE CONSULTATION WITH HLP MEMBERS CHASING PAVEMENTS ?

Should I give up,or should I just keep chasing pavements? Even if it leads me nowhere (Adele, Chasing Pavements)

4.1. The Town Hall Meeting (March 25) The town hall meeting was the first part of the consultation meeting with the HLP on March 25, 2013. Anselmo Lee (ADA) opened the meeting. He explained that the meeting is the last meeting for the HLP members before submitting their report in May. The HLP members would listen to civil society concerns and opinions, as well as to the voice of the marginalized and vulnerable communities. He believed that all participants who attended the town hall meeting were here to build international solidarity. He thanked HLP members to spend their time to meet with us this morning. Dwi Rubiyanti Khalifah (Indonesia CSO Coalition) and Amitabh Behar (GCAP Global ) chaired the meeting. Ruby explained that the town hall meeting would give opportunity to eight speakers from civil society and grass roots community to deliver their messages to HLP members. After the first speakers, the chair would give chance to the floor to speak and the HLP members to give response. Before the first speaker took the stand, Amitabh Behar gave chance to Ahmed Swapan (Asia Working Group) to read the key points of the CSO Communiqu. The first four speakers were Maria Bo Niok (migrant workers, refugees, and IDPs), Prasad Sirivella (indigenous peoples, ethnic minorities, Dalits and other socially excluded groups), Gregor Hadi Nitihardjo (represented children, person with disability, and ageing), Dian Kartika Sari (women, LBT and victims and survivors of gender violence). After the speeches, the floor made intervention by reminded the HLP members on the important issue of climate-induced migrants and access to water and sanitation. Two HLP members responded. The first member said that the proposed Post 2015 development agenda would be people-centered, based on justice, openness, and equality. However, he has not heard about environmental sustainability from the first four speakers. The second member mentioned that the panel has set forward their main priority that was poverty. He was optimistic that sustainable development was achievable but everybody needed to be focus and set the priorities right. The members expressed their appreciation to the CSOs for the works they had done, and mentioned that some of the issues they gathered include inclusive, gender equality and jobs for young people.

44|P a g e

The next four speakers were Gagan Sethi (human rights defenders, democracy advocates and development workers), Alejandro Barrios (small peasants, fisher folk and coastal communities), Dati Fatimah (workers, unemployed and urban poor), and Tom Thomas (participatory research). Ruby also gave time for the participants from the youth conference to deliver their messages. As respond to the speakers, one HLP member said that they needed to take into account several messages, and it was fair to say development in the past has been forgetting marginalized people, the poorest, so the messages today is to include them. The member would also take into account the dialogue with different groups, and carry the messages forward. The other member said that the HLP have identified the new challenges that the world were facing and not yet covered by the MDGs, including human rights, gender-based violence, youth and adolescents. He ensured that the new development agenda would not overlook persons with disabilities, as well as children. He believes that the participants has agreed that ending poverty and sustain prosperity for all would be the mutual vision for Post-2015 development agenda. A woman HLP member from Mexico stressed the importance of dialogue, and was grateful for CSOs commitment and enthusiasm. She encouraged CSOs to continue to work closely and enthusiastically together because the process would be a long process, and the work of the HLP, in spite of the complexity in many ways, is one of the easiest steps. She reminded all participants that the work after HLP report would be dominated by inter-governmental negotiation process. Therefore, the civil society must prepare for a very different form of engagement to influence the process. She said all of the valuable voices raised during the consultation would be taken into account. However, although the HLP would work hard to accommodate the voices and match the expectation from civil society, she was aware that the report would not be able to satisfy everybody. Therefore, she urged the civil society to continue the engagement through open and respectful dialogue. 4.2. The Roundtable Consultation (March 25) The next round of consultation between CSOs and the HLP members took form of five separated roundtable discussions, which covered thematic issues of vision and priorities, global partnership, means of implementation, global governance and accountability, and informal economy and inclusion.1 The roundtable on vision and priorities The discussion was chaired by Michel Anglade (Save the Children) and Amitabh Behar (GCAP). The HLP members who presented during the discussion were John Podesta, and three advisers for Andris Piebalgs, Tawakel Karman, and Graca Machel. The chair opened the discussion by

Thisproceedingscouldonlyreporttheroundtableprocessinfourgroups.Thereportfromroundtableonthemeansofimplementation wasmissing.

45|P a g e

allowing Risna Utami (Indonesia CSO Coalition) to present CSOs position on vision.

She was

followed by Kemberley Gittens (CPDC, Barbados) who presented the essential must have that must be included in the Post 2015 development agenda, and Sofia Garcia (SOS Children's Villages, Spain) who outlined social groups which required special focus in the development agenda. In response to the presentation, John Podesta assured the CSOs that the HLP members came to the meeting to listen collect thoughts from civil society. A number of panel including him have provided framework that look toward the end poverty in sustainable fashion. The list that the CSOs have provided was reflected in one form or another in the proposed framework. Furthermore, he wanted to remind everybody that while sustainability is under emphasized, one of the challenges for international system and national priorities is how to blend it together with goals and targets for opportunity and livelihood for all including marginalized group. One of the adviser stated that list of essential must have put by the CSOs were absolutely key things. Moreover, John also added that planetary boundaries must become the main consideration in the new development agenda because we cannot ignore the relation between poverty and growing number of worlds population. One of the CSOs participants said that the first step to accommodate planetary boundaries is by including the social groups who have been excluded in the current MDGs process. The other participants underlined the statement and said that one major gap which has taken place in the current MDGs framework is its inability to include the people who are socially excluded. This is a global issue, not national issue, as this has happened in many countries. Two other participants reminded the HLP members to put more attention to the children and youth group who has limited voice in the current global development, while others urged the HLP panel to keep education and health reproduction high on the agenda. Participants from Morocco asked the HLP members not to ignore countrys specific context in where the development would take place. As example, in the Arab world, the development agenda must go hand in hand with the democracy strengthening. The Arabs Spring taught Arab people that development must strengthen peoples dignity. On the other hand, participants from Bhutan and Sri Lanka raised the need to have bold transformative vision beyond economic growth by mainstreaming human rights and good governance in the Post-2015 development agenda. Other participant from Argentina urged the HLP members to develop financing In the end, mechanism beyond aid and push for stronger private sector accountability.

participant from Oxfam reminded everybody to develop effective engagement process in the inter-governmental negotiation process after the HLP submitted their report to the UN Secretary General. The chair closed the discussion by highlighting some consensus that included the need to emphasize inclusion, inclusive growth and universal well-being in the vision of the post 2015 development agenda.

46|P a g e

The roundtable on global partnerships The roundtable was chaired by Fraser Reilly-King (Canadian Council for International-Cooperation, Canada) and Caroline Usikpedo-Omoniye (Niger Delta Womens Movement for Peace and Development). The HLP was represented by Homi Kharas, Maria Angela Holguin, and Fulbert Arjun Karki (LDC Watch, Nepal), Norma Maldonado (Association Raxchoch Amoussouga. The chairs gave opportunity for four speakers from CSOs to deliver their messages after the opening. Oxlaju, Guatemala), Richard Ssewakiriyangan (CPDE, Uganda), dan Abishek Upadhyay (Post-2015 Youth Consultation, India) took their time to speak to the HLP members. They stressed the need to integrate an inclusive global partnership into the Post-2015 development agenda in the context of sustainable development. They urged the HLP to prioritize the most vulnerable states, such as the Least Developed Countries (LDC), Small Island Developing States (SIDS), Land-locked Developing Countries, and Fragile and Conflict Affected States. They also underlined the importance to move from aid effectiveness to development effectiveness that aimed to implement a comprehensive human and social development. Therefore, all development aid must ensure the availability of financial additionality dan development additionality. The HLP members appreciated the inputs from the CSOs and agreed that the idea of inclusive global partnership must be integrated in the Post-2015 development agenda through bigger and more effective participation from the civil society, including the youth group. Maria Angela Holguin believed that inclusive global partnership represents a paradigm shift from the current MDGs framework. She argued that achieving the sustainable development would be impossible without inclusive global partnerships that involve governments, private sector, and civil society. Homi Kharas, on the other hand, stated that both inclusive partnership as attitude and means of implementation must exist in the Post-2015 development agenda. He was aware on the ongoing question about the role of private sector in the agenda since the civil society has unfavorable view towards them. Furthermore, the unequal partnership between the North and the South, which often involved international financial institutions like the World Bank and IMF must also be addressed. Fulbert Amoussouga, on the other hand, emphasized the need to prioritize the rural area since most of the poor population lives in the area. The new global partnership must expand its orientation beyond increasing the level of income since effective poverty reduction requires commitment to improve the access to education, health facilities, and other basic services. The roundtable on global governance and accountability The roundtable was chaired by Patricia M. Sarenas (CODE-NGO, Philippines) and Anselmo Lee (ADA/KCOC, South Korea). Emilia Pires (East Timor). The HLP members who presented in the roundtable were Minister The chair opened the roundtable by outlining the main issues and Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala (Nigeria); Adviser to Queen Rania Al-Abdullah (Jordan) and adviser to Ms.

47|P a g e

procedures of the discussion. It started by presentation of CSO position from Dina Lumban Tobing (Indonesia), and Laura Hukom (World Vision Indonesia), followed by the responses from HLP members (and their representatives). Then, selected CSO representatives will present follow up questions, before other participants are invited to join the conversation. The presentation started with identification of global democratic deficits that lead into exclusion of the majority of citizens from decision-making affecting their lives. To solve the democratic deficits, CSOs urge the panel members to design post-2015 development framework, which institutionalizing democratic participation and accountability at all level based on the principles of equality, justice and human rights. The framework should also promote and protect the space for civil society to engage effectively in development processes. The member and their representatives who presented at the roundtable briefed the participants on the processes of deliberation and current thinking in the HLP. They informed the participants that nothing surprises them from what CSOs asked. Inclusive and democratic governance and accountability has been accepted as the new ways of working for the Post-2015 frameworks (by HLP members). However, the panel members reminded participants that in the existing global system, nation-states is still important. Hence, global democratic governance and accountability could only works when there were national democratic governance and accountability. In this context, the HLP members urged civil society to continue advocating their positions to their national government, so that the UN General Assembly could adopt the position in September 2013. The HLP members urged the CSOs to come up with a more concrete measurements, and mechanism to monitor progress on global governance and accountability. The following discussion shared the experience of the various CSOs in enhancing democratic governance and accountability. Those are experiences from China (DAWN), United Kingdom (CAFOD), Philippines (APWLD), Mexico (ALOP) and South Africa (CIVICUS). The participants also highlighted experiences on transparency, access to information and access to justice issues. Unfortunately, and this is my own impression, the discussion are not necessarily related and supported the CSOs positions ('what is asked from HLP'). For example, nobody give a clear example how national democratic governance and accountability linked to global governance and accountability as hinted by the panel members. Moreover, none of the speaker came up with a very clear indicators and measurement to measure the progress of the 'new' formation. One speaker was carried away by discussion on their experience in facilitating peace education in Indonesia, without honed down those experiences to the position of CSOs in the proposed Post2015 framework. An interesting discussion on data availability and accessibility went on during the roundtable. It highlighted the weaknesses of MDGs. However, there were no concrete proposals on how the Post-2015 development framework should address that issue.

48|P a g e

In the concluding remarks, Minister Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala was welcoming the opportunity to engage with CSOs representatives. She is urging CSO to continue advocating their positions to their national governments. She is optimistic that HLP report will touch most of the issues discussed in the roundtable. The moderator closed the roundtable by emphasizing the need for new model of global governance based on equality and justice, and protecting the space for civil society. The roundtable on informal economy and inclusion The roundtable was chaired by Alison Margaret Tate (ITUC, Australia) while the HLP was represented by Jean-Michel Severino and advisers for Gunilla Carlsson and KadirTopbas. The chair opened the discussion by stressing the impact of global financial crisis towards the level of unemployment. Alison stated that most of the unemployed is also unprotected. Afterward, she gave opportunity to CSOs representatives to deliver their messages to the HLP members. Those speakers were Ishak Salim (Active Society Institut (AcSI), Makasar - Indonesia), Rekson Silaban (KSBI, Indonesia), Ronny Hudiprakoso (TAGO, Indonesia), Anis Hidayah (Migrant CARE, Indonesia), Gabriela Cruz (Pnesidacuta de los Pescadous Antesonalesdel Equador), and Davids Eltyanli (East African Trade unions Confederation, Uganda). Ishak urged the HLP to include stronger protection for the informal economy in the Post-2015 development agenda. The protection must oblige the national and local government to develop adequate policy to protect, give incentive and capacity building for the informal economy, which enable them to compete with the formal sector. On the other hand, Anis requested the HLP to strengthen the protection of migrant workers from abuse, human rights violation and slavery practice, especially in Arab countries. Rekson used his speech to urge the HLP to adopt the He hinted on the needs to descent work agenda in the Post-2015 development agenda, especially strengthen the social protection for workers, both in formal and informal economy. establish a global fund for social protection. Meanwhile, in the context of person with disability, Rony demanded the HLP to push the implementation of affirmative policy to ensure an inclusive development process. The HLP members gave positive respond to the speakers. Jean-Michel agreed with ishak that the Post-2105 development agenda must include clear measure to protect the informal economy. He believed that strengthening informal economy does not mean integrating it into the formal economy. The principles of connection with protection must guide the policy towards informal economy. In the context of descent work, he questioned the priority whether it would be formulating new laws or improving the implementation of the existing law and regulations. He believed that every country need to prepare road map to adopt social protection. Meanwhile, in response to the issue of migrant workers, Jean-Michel believed that the HLP must have a deeper understanding on the issue.

49|P a g e

Gabriela Cruz closed the discussion by sharing her story in Equador. messages to the government. 4.3. Communiqu Meeting of the HLP on the Post-2015 Development Agenda

She said that the

marginalized would be heard if they could organize themselves and developed clear and coherent

We, members of the HighLevel Panel commissioned by the United Nations SecretaryGeneral to recommend an ambitious yet achievable framework for the worlds post2015 development agenda, met in Bali, Indonesia from 25 to 27 March 2013. We discussed how to build a global partnership and means of implementation for our development agenda. We highly value the importance of an open, transparent and inclusive process. We seek to promote global ownership of a shared development agenda. We have therefore consulted with a range of stakeholders prior to and during our meeting in Bali on a range of development issues. We heard reports from women, youth and the informal sector, from parliamentarians and other elected representatives, the initial findings of national, regional and thematic consultations conducted by civil society, academia, the UN, national governments, the private sector, and other stakeholders. We welcome the richness and depth they have brought to the process and are committed to continuing broad consultations and to finding ways of reflecting the priorities that we have heard. At this weeks meeting, we agreed on the need for a renewed Global Partnership that enables a transformative, peoplecentered and planetsensitive development agenda which is realized through the equal partnership of all stakeholders. Such partnership should be based on the principles of equity, sustainability, solidarity, respect for humanity and shared responsibilities in accordance with respective capabilities. Our vision is to end extreme poverty in all its forms in the context of sustainable development and to have in place the building blocks of sustained prosperity for all We realize our vision will only be possible if we define the means of implementation and encourage partnerships at all levels, throughout all development processes. A global partnership will therefore be an integral part of a new development framework after 2015. We also recognize the need to promote a single and coherent post2015 development agenda that integrates economic growth, social inclusion and environmental sustainability. It is essential that all post2015 intergovernmental processes and outcomes, including the Rio+20 outcomes and its followup, are coherent and mutually reinforcing. The United Nations SecretaryGeneral has an important supportive role to play in this regard. Humbly acknowledging the many other international and regional initiatives that will take forward these issues, we highlight four key areas on which progress is needed to achieve our post2015 vision:

50|P a g e

Reshaped and revitalized global governance and partnerships. The challenges of our globalized world are becoming more complex and crosscutting in nature, while stakeholders become more diverse and play more roles. Our approach to addressing such challenges should be universally applicable while at the same time implementable at the national, subnational, community and individual levels. We therefore need to strengthen global governance to ensure it is fit for its purpose; avoid overlap and the duplication of efforts; and encourage joint work to address crosscutting issues. This includes ensuring that the United Nations, multilateral systems, and all development actors effectively support the post2015 development agenda, using a full array of technical exchange, trade, migration, investment and other instruments to strengthen societies and protect human rights. Enhanced and scaled up models of cooperation among all levels of governments, the private sector, and civil society at the global, regional, national, and subnational levels will be needed. The wealth of experience from the Millennium Development Goals should be a reference for our effort to help shape global governance and responsive partnerships.

Protection of the global environment. Our peoplecentered and planetsensitive post2015 agenda will need to be grounded in a commitment to address global environmental challenges, strengthen resilience, and improve disaster preparedness capacities. A more stable climate, clean atmosphere, and healthy and productive forests and oceans are just some of the environmental resources from which we all benefit. People living in poverty have been hardest hit by the degradation of the global environment. We have considered where the post2015 development framework should help address environmental challenges by promoting global cooperation in line with each countrys level of capacity and responsibility to act.

Sustainable Production and Consumption. The future development framework should consider the challenge of the predicted peak of human population to 910 billion in 2050 and the need to manage the worlds production and consumption patterns in more sustainable and equitable ways. There should also be changed behavior in this regard in all countries in order to make more efficient use of environmental assets and resources. This speaks to the new agenda being truly universal.

Strengthened means of implementation. We agreed that a post2015 agenda should clearly specify the means of implementation, including financing for development. A greater commitment to improving and using country systems as well as the global system in this regard is particularly important. Ownership at all levels is crucial. Adequate, stable and predictable financing, as well as efficient use of resources, is required to support development. This will require honoring international, regional, and national financing commitments, enhancing domestic resource mobilization, and multiple complementary and innovative sources of finance such as private investment, corporate social responsibility, philanthropy,

51|P a g e

NorthSouth, SouthSouth and triangular cooperation, publicprivate partnerships, debt swaps, guarantees and market mechanisms. Particularly important will be the regulation of tax havens and illicit financial flows. Enhanced knowledge sharing, capacity building, technology transfers, data collection and trade will also be key. Data availability and better accountability in measuring progress. We need a data revolution. Too often, development efforts have been hampered by a lack of the most basic data about the social and economic circumstances in which people live. Substantial improvements in national and sub-national statistical systems including local and sub-national levels and the availability, quality and timeliness of baseline data, disaggregated by sex, age, region and other variables, will be needed. Stronger monitoring and evaluation at all levels, and in all processes of development (from planning to implementation) will help guide decision making, update priorities and ensure accountability. This will require substantial investments in building capacity in advance of 2015. A regularly updated registry of commitments is one idea to ensure accountability and monitor delivery gaps. We must also take advantage of new technologies and access to open data for all people. Following this meeting in Bali, the Panel will begin to draft a final report. We are grateful to those who have provided insights and inputs through meetings, consultations, and other submissions. We will strive to ensure that the report, to be submitted to the Secretary General at the end of May 2013, responds to these aspirations, concerns and interests and is consistent with the commitments of all countries and stakeholders. We also hope that the Panels work will promote a single and coherent post2015 development agenda. We extend our thanks to the Government of Indonesia and the people of Bali for their warmth and hospitality.

52|P a g e

V.

THE WAY FORWARD TOWARDS AND BEYOND NEW YORK

Ruby Khalifah, Co-Chair The consultation process of HLP members with non-state sectors, including Civil Societies has concluded in Bali on 25th-27th March 2013. Nevertheless, for CSO, it is just beginning of long journey in advocating a new paradigm development on the Post-2015 development agenda, which must be people-centered, planet-sensitive and enables structural transformation. The proceeding that is now in your hand reflects strong efforts of global CSO in uniting multi voices in looking at vision and priorities, global partnership and mean of implementation to be submitted to HLP members. On the CSO communiqu, we admit that the Post-2015 development agenda must give priorities to improve quality of life of Indigenous peoples, religious and ethnic minority groups, marginalized caste groups, stateless people, people living in remote and conflict or disasteraffected areas, women, children Including those without parental care, youth, the aged, disabled, LGBT, people living with HIV and AIDS, smallscale food producers, and the informal sector. Their voices must be used as basis of formulating a new paradigm of global partnership and mean of implementation, including having law reform. Through the lens of marginalized, vulnerable and minority groups, we got common understanding on global partnership, which should address equal partnership, respect human rights, and dignity. Ownership should be translated into improving local capacity and taking into consideration that each country has its uniqueness and has different level of responsibilities. While, to change structural imbalances, international trade policy and rules must consider local potentials and sustainability, therefore the internal resource mobilization, fair trade, international tax regulation, avoid privatization; protect common goods, elimination structural violence against women, transparency and accountability must be highlighted into the new framework. Equality, inclusiveness and non-discrimination must be strong embedded as principles for post 2015 framework. However, these concerns above had addressed during town hall and roundtable discussion with HLP members, I feel that this issues were not strongly reflected in the HLP communiqu. Partly, it perhaps focus of Bali which was more on global partnership and mean of implementation, so inequality is not visible. Secondly, the HLP has its own priority to be address. Therefore, CSO must bring up the process and content on the proceeding to fuel Indonesia CSO Coalition to prepare future steps of advocacy in order to ensure that key words of equality, inclusiveness, sustained environment, and equal partnership are visible. While, we enable internal resource mobilization to finance development, CSO must prepare better for responding final report of the HLP. This proceeding should be able to unite the multi voices among CSO to take

53|P a g e

up the next steps. Moreover, it should be treated as an open document that needs to be read together with other international documents related to the future world we want. Finally, as cochair, the proceeding will always remind us to a beautiful moment where Indonesia CSO and international CSO in craving multi voices into a single document. We welcome constructive feedback, input and criticism from you to improve the quality of our proceedings.

54|P a g e

Annex 1. CSO preparatory meeting (23-24 March) and Stakeholder Outreach Day (25 March) with the HLP on Post-2015 Development Agenda
Day 1 - March 23, 2013, Goodway Hotel

08:00-09:00 09:00-10:30

Registration Opening session Moderator Mr Sugeng Bahagijo, INFID, Indonesia z Welcome Remarks & Introduction of Program and Participants Ms Ruby Khalifah, Co-chair / Indonesia CSO Coalition Mr Anselmo Lee, Acting Co-Chair / Asia Working Group (AWG)

Question and Answer Presentations 1) HLP processand Stakeholder Outreach Day event (25 Mar) http://www.post2015hlp.org/ HLP Secretariat - Lisa John, Indonesian Government - Mr.Yanuar Nugroho, Presidential Office 2) Report from the 2ndLondon HLP (Dec. 2012) 3) Report from the 3rdMonrovia HLP (Jan/Feb. 2013) Ms Salina Sanou, ACORD, Kenya 4) Introduction of World We Want web platform (www.worldwewant2015.org) Ms Kathryn Tobin, NGLS Questions and Answers 10:30-11:00 11:00-12:30 Break Session 1: Panel on Post- 2015 Development Agenda and CSO (plenary) Agenda and tasks - Update on global consultation on thematic issues - Sharing of CSO perspectives Moderators Mr Wicaksana Sarosa, Kemitraan, Indonesia Ms Patricia M. Sarenas, Code-NGO, Philippines Speakers Understanding about Social, Economic, Political and Cultural Challenges and Contest

Mr Setyo Budiantoro, Prakarsa, Indonesia Mr Micheal B Hoelman, TIFA, Indonesia

Thematic Presentation 1) Economic developmentand inequality, Mr Isagani Serrano, Social Watch, Philippines Ms Cai Yiping, DAWN, China 2) Social development and justice Mr Gagan Sethi, India 3) Peace, security and fragility Ms Nooria Safai, Afghanistan 4) Environment and sustainability, Mr Alejandro Barrios, Bolivia MsTeresita Vistro, Philppines 12:30-14:00 14:00-15:30 Lunch Session 2: National and Regional Preparatory Meeting (Breakout) Agenda and tasks - Update CSO preparations at national and regional levels - Discuss engagement strategies at the national and regional levels - Divide and choose participants among thematic working groups Group and Facilitators 1) Indonesia, Indonesia CSO Coalition 2) Asia Development Alliance (ADA) 3) Africa, African Working Group 4) Latin and Central America 5) Europe and/or North America, CONCORD 6) MENA 7) Central Asia and/or CIS 8) Global CSO networks 15:30-16:00 16:00-17:30 Break Session 3: Thematic Working Group I (Breakout) Agenda and tasks - Update on the global discussion on thematic issues - Discusskey messages to be contained in the statement A. B. C. D. Vision and priorities facilitated by GCAP and Save the Children Global partnerships facilitated by CPDE and LDC Watch, Means of implementation facilitated by ActionAid, Social Watch, JSAPMDD, Global governance and accountability Facilitated by CIVICUS, ADA, INFID and APWLD

E.

Informal Sector and Inclusion Facilitated by ITUC, ASPPUK (Mohammad Firdaus)

18:00-17:00 19:00-21:00 21:00-22:00

Womens Caucus I Welcome Dinner Reception Working committee meeting

Day 2 - March 24, 2013, Goodway Hotel

08:30-09:30

Session 4: Recap and Reporting (plenary) Agenda and tasks - Share the outcome of the regional and thematic meetings - Build common perspectives Moderators Mr Ahmed Swapan, Co-Chair / Beyond 2015 Mr Anselmo Lee, Program Committee / Asia Working Group Speakers Rapporteurs from national / regional preparatory meetings Rapporteurs from thematic working groups I

09:30-10:30

Session 5: Thematic Working group II (breakout) continued Agenda and tasks Draft thematic statements (key messages) to be delivered to HLP on 25 Mar. Select 5-6 speakers, one from each region at the Roundtable Develop engagement strategies for Roundtable

A. Vision and priorities facilitated by GCAP and Save the Children B. Global partnerships facilitated by CPDE and LDC Watch, C. Means of implementation facilitated by Social Watch, JSAPMDD, Oxfam, ActionAid, D. Global governance and accountability Facilitated by CIVICUS and E. Informal Sector and Inclusion Facilitated by ITUC and ASPPUK
10:30-11:00 11:00-12:30 Break Session 6: Adoption of Statements (Plenary) Agenda and Tasks Share outcome of each thematic working group Finalize CSO thematic statements common and each Discuss common strategies for the roundtable

Moderators Ms Yuyun, Working Group on Human Rights, Indonesia, Mr Justin Michael Kilkullen, CONCORD

Speakers A. Rapporteur B. Rapporteur C. Rapporteur D. Rapporteur E. Rapporteur 12:30-14:00 14:00-15:30

from working group on Vision and priorities from working group on Global partnerships from working group on Means of implementation from working group on Global governance and accountability Informal Sector and Inclusion

Lunch Working lunch among moderators and selected speakers for each roundtable Session 7: Sectoral Working Group(Breakout) Agenda and Tasks In preparation for the Town Hall Meeting (25 Mar) Discuss and finalize the statements (3 minutes) Discuss engagement strategies List of Sectoral Working Groups Multi-sectoral / Common Statement A. Common statement on key message PARTICIPATE & Drafting/Advocacy Committee Sectoral Groups (7) B. C. D. E. F. G. H. Migrant workers, Refugee, IDPs Indigenous, Ethnic minorities, Dalits Children, Person with disability, ageing Woman, Victims of gender violence, LGBT Human rights defender, democracy advocate, development worker under threat Small peasant, fisher folk and coastal communities Worker, unemployee, urban poor

15:30-16:00 16:00-17:00

Break Session 8: Synthesis (plenary) Agenda and tasks In preparation for Town Hall Meeting (25 Mar) Share the outcome of sectoral working group to the plenary Discuss and finalize the statements of outcome of CSO forum (3 minutes)

Discuss engagement strategies

Moderators Ms Dian Kartikasari, KPI, Indonesia Mr Anselmo Lee, ADA/AWG Speakers - Rapporterus from sectoral groups - Rapportuer from Youth Preparatory meeting 17:00-18:00 Closing Session Agenda and tasks - Update the outcome of CSO meeting in Bonn - Discuss strategies for engagement with HLP, OWG and UN GA Moderator Ms Ruby Kholifah, Co-chair / Indonesia CSO Coalition Mr Ahmed Swapan, Co-Chair / Beyond 2015 Speakers 1. CSO Conference in Bonn 2. GCAP Amitabh Behar, GCAP Global Co-Chair 3. Campaign for Peoples Goals (CPG) 4. CSO engagement with stakeholders including parliamentarians, Mr Minar Pimple, UNMC 5. CSO engagement on UN Open-ended Working Group (OWG) and General Assembly General discussion Closing remarks by Co-Chairs 18:00-19:00 Dinner Working dinner among moderators and selected speakers for Town Hall meeting Press Conference by Co-Chairs and regional focal points

18:00-19:00 19:00-21:00 19:00-21:00

Working committees media, rapporteurs, etc. Womens Caucus II - Preparatory meeting for Roundtable on women (25 Mar) Facilitated by APWLD and FEMNET Stakeholder Outreach HLP-CSOs March 25, 2013. Westin Hotel

08:00-09:00 09:00-10:30

Registration Town Hall Citizens Voice for the Post-2015 Agenda

Moderators Ms Ruby Khalifah, Indonesia CSO Coalition Mr Amitabh Behar, GCAP Co-convener, 1) 2) 3) 4) 11:30-11:00 11:00-12:30 Participatory Research Grass-roots Voices Civil Society Social Movements

Break Roundtable with CSOs and HLP members (breakout) 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Vision and priorities Global partnerships Means of implementation Global governance and accountability Informal Sector and Inclusion

1230-1400 14:00-15:30

Lunch Break Roundtables with HLP Members (Breakout) Note: CSO are invited to attend as observer 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Business Parliamentarians Academics Women by APWLD and FEMNET Youth

15:30-16:00 16:00-17:30

Break Feedback from ongoing consultations (16:00-17:30) Agenda and tasks CSO are invited to attend as observer 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) Thematic and country consultations Regional Consultations MyWorld Perspectives from the business community Partnerships Closing ceremony at Goodway Hotel

19.00-21.00

Annex 2. RESEARCHERS PRESENTATION TO THE HLP TOWN HALL MEETING

Tom Thomas, Praxis-India I am here to present the key findings of two processes One; the outcome of national civil society consultations from 40 countries organised by GCAP / Beyond 2015 and IFP The second; 84 participatory studies with the poorest and most marginalised analysed by the Participate initiative. These messages have been corroborated by other participatory researchers in the CSO planning events of the past few days. We have seven key messages between us: 1. Interventions that improve the lives of the poor frequently fail to benefit the very poor and the most marginalised. For example, sexual minorities get excluded from healthcare and other social benefits due to powerful exclusionary mechanisms such as stigma. In some countries, there is over 90% enrolment for children in primary schools, but it is less than 10% for disabled children. This is a matter of rights. We need to specifically orient development to the very poor and most marginalised and need disaggregated data and monitoring to show whether they are benefiting from development or not; 2. Rapid change, insecurity and uncertainty, increasingly characterise the environment that the poorest live in. This comes from climate change, food price volatility, displacement from war, day to day conflict etc. Development processes need to take cognisance of this and be much more responsive to highly dynamic environments. 3. Poor governance is widely seen to be a major contributor to poverty. Governance needs to be rooted in accountability, trust, access to information, responsiveness and effectiveness. Those are values that can best be achieved through citizen engagement. 4. Inequalities are persistent - and pervasive We need development processes that prioritise the elimination of institutional discrimination and challenge local social norms that exclude.

5.

Current policies lead to unintended consequences and perverse effects, which make poverty and exclusion worse. We need holistic development responses, which understand that the different parts of peoples lives are connected and that often, unless all or most of their issues are addressed, none of them can be resolved.

6.

Development that is sustainable requires meaningful participation that leads to strong local ownership. Participation needs to be embedded throughout the development process in its conception, design, implementation and evaluation.

7.

Development must remain within planetary boundaries. This can be achieved through environmentally sustainable economic systems, energy use and resource consumption.

So what this research presents is a vision of participatory development which builds local ownership and leads to sustainability; which is long term and not locked into short term projects; which is holistic and doesnt treat the different aspects of peoples lives as unconnected; and where the rights of the extreme poor and most marginalised are made a priority.

Annex 3. INTER-FAITH DECLARATION FOR THE POST 2015 DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK

We the participants of the Interfaith Group from the CSO Forum Participatory Meeting for the Post 2015 Development Agenda on 22 25 March, 2013 1) Recognize the value of the meeting of Interfaith community leaders and activists as well the those affected by conflict, disasters, or marginalized by unsustainable development across Indonesia, in terms of the sharing of grassroots experiences and best practices, as well as mutual learning, problem solving, unity, solidarity, empathy, and finding practical alternative solutions for the future of the world that we want to live in post 2015. 2) Note the significance of the testimonies of suffering from the survivors of minority persecution, conflict and disaster, as well as the resilience of village health workers, people with disability (PWD) and mothers of children with disabilities, the CNN Hero on decreasing maternal mortality rate (MMR), rural women heros on water and environmental protection, and the leaders of activist movements from various Religions: Moslem (Sunni and Syiah), Christians (Protestant and Catholics), Buddhists, Hindus and indigenous religions (Sunda Wiwitan), coming from prominent faith based organizations such as Nahdlatul Ulema, Muhammadiyah, Ahmadiyah, Yakkum/ACT Alliance, Caritas, Humanitarian Forum Indonesia, Gusdurian Network, Perisadha Hindu Dharma, Tag International and a further 10 CSOs and CBOs in Indonesia. 3) Express our deep gratitude to the Indonesian Coalition for Post 2015 Advocacy for hosting the Consultation. Having digested and discussed all processes of the CSO Forum including the final CSO communiqu, the processes of Town Hall and the round tables with HLPEP: 1) We are concerned about the global and national post 2015 challenges due to the implementation of growth without equity, equality, inclusion and sustainable development; 2) We express our empathy, solidarity, and pray for more than 170,000 people displaced due to conflicts and minority persecution in Indonesia, more than 375 million displaced globally by disasters every year; the 19,000 children that die daily from preventable diseases, the 800 women dying daily from preventable causes related to pregnancy and childbirth across the globe and the 15% of the total the population of our planet becoming disabled through human induced and natural calamities; the majority of which are the poor and uneducated.

3) We are concerned about the deadlock in global commitment on partnership and means of implementation for saving the planet from the impact of climate change (COP 18 Doha) and ensuring a sustainable society (UNCSD, Rio +20) and we are concerned about the future of the formulation of concrete means implementation commitment from the HLPEP and further processes of the post 2015 development agenda. 4) We recognize that the main causes of failure of the current global partnership and means of implementation are due to the global focus on material based, unsustainable development of the environment, unjust trade-tax and debt system, the lack of global and national accountability and transparency, the lack of participation from vulnerable, grassroots peoples; and the elimination of intangible assets which are a powerful source of resilience, based on universal human values, social cohesion and spirituality. 5) We recognize that strengthening peoples resilience in the face of natural and man made hazards, protection and security for vulnerable people who are alienated from markets, and tackling inequality are the three crosscutting issues necessary to ensure the humanity and integrity of creation and humankind post 2015 6) We recognize that the model and principles of resilience strengthening, based on actual experiences and best practices from grassroots actors, show that humans are the central asset of development and their full well being should be envisioned within the development paradigm in which positive spirit of volunteerism, social cohesion, mutual tolerance, respect and dignity are embraced, nurtured and sustained 7) We recognize the power and the danger of faith. In the wrong place, religion may violate human rights, but in the right place faith and religion may become the source of peoples resilience. 8) We recognize the universal values of faith-based communities to support peoples resilience are love, rahmatan lil aalamin, humanity and dignity, a pure and clean heart, action-oriented faiths, not only empty commitments. 9) We recognize that the natural environment sustains livelihoods and protects millions of people on the Earth; sustainable environmental management must be integrated in a coherent manner to the strategies of all development actors with specific focus on ensuring that communities themselves are active protectors and beneficiaries of their lands 10) We recognize that an enabling environment for resilience strengthening must allow accountable participation in policies and program development, implementation, monitoring, reporting and evaluation, equitable participation of all relevant stakeholders particularly critical for those without access, women, person with disability, the elderly and children, sharing

common but differentiated responsibilities between parties and countries, respecting and supporting CSO contribution. 11) We affirm the strengths and weaknesses of the Civil Society Communiqu from the Global CSO Forum on the Post 2015 Development Agenda, March 23-24, 2013, Bali, Indonesia. The communiqu mainly reaffirms recognition of the global development deficits, the structural root cause of problems and the need for global transformational development. The communiqu also mentions resilience strengthening as the solution and is prioritized as a development target for vulnerable groups that have been neglected in the planning, benefit and evaluation of their right to development. However, the communiqu was developed based on a material and problem based paradigm, with a lack of practical alternative solutions and neglected the intangible assets of vulnerable people including resilience based on social cohesion and spirituality as a source of positive energy in the post 2015 development agenda. In accordance with the aforementioned, 1) We commit to act directly at the grassroots level to achieve the current MDG goals by 2015 using existing human resources and the assets of the interfaith network. Therefore we call on all parties both public and private, CSOs at all levels; global, regional, national and local to work hand and hand to solve current gaps in the MDGs. 2) We commit to expressing our compassion and solidarity for all victims of minority persecutions in Indonesia, victims of conflict and disaster, victims of violence, victims of climate change, through humanitarian actions and transformational developments. Therefore we call on all parties, especially the government, to ensure an enabling environment and security for humanitarian and development workers. 3) We commit to continue to share the positive energy for the future of sustainable development based on love, rahmatan lil aalamin, humanity and dignity, a pure and clean heart, and faith brought to life through action. 4) We will continue our interfaith advocacy network starting from grassroots up to local, national, regional and global levels, to promote just and sustainable development, which sustains Gods creation. 5) We pray for and support the members of HLPEP in making wise decisions with full consideration and commitment to those who suffer, are voiceless, and powerless, and the grassroots people at the bottom of pyramid. Bali, Indonesia , March 25, 2013

List of participating organizations: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Action by Churches Together Alliance (ACT Alliance) Aisyiah ARIPATI Bumi Sehat Bali Caritas indonesia/ Karina Christian Aid CD Bethesda CBM 38. PKMD Lestari jaya 39. Rumpun 40. Serikat Tani Merdeka 41. Sunda Wiwitan 42. Tag International Development 43. Wahana Lingkungan Hidup 44. Yakkum Bali 45. Yakkum

10. DSM Bali 11. Forum Kader Kesehatan Lombok 12. GBKP Ate Keleng 13. Habitat for Humanity 14. HMI 15. HKPM 16. Humanitarian Forum Indonesia 17. INFID 18. Indonesian CSO Coalition for Post 2015 19. Ikatan Mahasiswa Muhammadiyah 20. Jaringan Gusdurian 21. KPI Flores Timur 22. Komunitas Syiah Sampang 23. Kemitraan 24. Koalisi Perempuan 25. LPBN- Pengurus Besar NU 26. Migran Care 27. Muhammadiyah 28. Nahdatul Ulama 29. Oxfam 30. Organisasi Rakyat Bantul 31. Organisasi rakyat Grobogan 32. Organisasi Rakyat Rembang 33. Organissi penyandang Disabilitas Yogyakarta 34. Pedukuhan Gempol-Merapi 35. Prakarsa 36. Perisadha Hindu Darma 37. PKPU

Annex 4. Feedback from Participants The feedback was gathered from participants through short survey on seven areas of the meeting that includes: (1) food service; (2) support from organizing committee; (3) activities; (4) program of the meeting; (5) speakers/source persons; (6) side events; and (7) advice for future improvement. Twenty-four people participated in the survey with the results below: Tabel 1. Summary of the participants feedback Support Food service from organizing committee Very good Good Fair Bad Very bad 24 23 24 24 23 23 5 9 10 5 9 7 2 5 12 7 Activities Speakers/ source persons 4 22 7 2 13 8 Side events

Program of the meeting

3 12 8 1

Most of the survey respondents were satisfied with the quality of the speakers/source persons, the program of the meeting, and the activities, as well as the side events. More than half of the respondents stated that the food service was good or very good. However, some of them were not satisfied with the support from the organizing committee. The respondents gave several advices for future improvement that includes need for better coordination among the organizing committee, better handling in ticket reservation for participants, earlier dissemination of meeting materials, and better quality of translators.

Annex 5.
LIST OF NATIONAL PARTICIPANTS OF CSO GLOBAL FORUM AND OUTREACH DAY AT THE 4TH HLP MEETING ON THE POST-2015 DEVELOPMENT AGENDA GOODWAY HOTEL NUSA DUA, BALI - INDONESIA 1. Antarini Arna, OXFAM (INGO), aarna@oxfam.org.uk 2. Adiningtyas Prima Yulianti, Aliansi Remaja Independen Pati, adiningtyas.prima@gmail.com 3. Aditya Wardhana, Indonesia AIDS Coalition (IAC), awardhana@iac.or.id 4. Adrian Brahma Aditya, CBM Indonesia, adrianbrahma@cbmindonesia.org 5. Alexander Irwan, Ford Foundation (INGO), A.Irwan@fordfoundation.org 6. Alissa Wahid, Jaringan Gusdurian Indonesia Jakarta, alissawahid2@gmail.com 7. Alvon Kurnia Parma, YLBHI, alvon@ylbhi.or.id 8. 9. Ananias, Grass Root YAKKUM Andira Pramayatsari Daryanto, Yayasan Wisma Cheshire Young Voices Indonesia (a project of Leonard Cheshire Disability), yvindonesia.cheshire@hotmail.co.id; andirapramatyasari@gmail.com; mahesh.chandrasekar@lcdisability.org 10. Api Sulistyo, HFI, apisulistyo@gmail.com 24. 22. 23. 20. 21. 17. 18. 19. 16. 13. 14. 15. 12. 11. Aria Indrawati, Persatuan Tunanetra Indonesia (Pertuni), aria.indrawati@gmail.com Atashendartini Habsjah, INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION (IPPF) (INGO) dan PKBI, atashabsjah@yahoo.com Berly Martawardaya Benedicta H.B, KPI Flores Timur Budi Wahyuni, Yayasan Annisa Swasti Yogyakarta, budi_wahyuni@yahoo.com Chabibulah, Serikat Tani Merdeka (SeTAM) Magelang, setammer@yahoo.com Chitra Retna S, Christiana Shinta Widimulyani, WVI Cristina Eghenter, WWF Indonesia, cegheuter@wwf.or.id Dadan Ramlan, TIFA Daniel Marguari, Yayasan Spiritia, danielmarguari@gmail.com Daniel Richard, FES Darmawati D. Natakusumah, FSPMI (mitra FES) Dati Fatimah, Aksara (NGO) Yogyakarta,

perhimpunan.aksara@gmail.com, datifatimah@gmail.com 25. Dewi Kanti, Yayasan Tri Mulya Cigugur/Organisasi Penghayat Sunda Wiwitan (Anggota jaringan Aliansi Nasional Bhinneka Tunggal/ANBTI) Kuningan, dewikanti@hotmail.com ninoy_ngo@yahoo.com 26. Dini Widiastuti, Oxfam Indonesia, dwidiastuti@oxfam.org.id 27. Dian Lestariningsih, Karina, Caritas Indonesia, Jakarta, dianlestariningsih@gmail.com 28. Don K Marut, YAKKUM, donmarut@yahoo.com 29. Dormiana Yustina Manurung, FES, mian@fes.or.id 30. Dr. Ramonasari G, SRHR Activist, ramonasari@yahoo.com 31. Dwitri Amalia, CIPG (Centre for Innovation Policy and Governance), dwitri.amalia@cipg.or.id 32. Eddy Setiadi Soedjono, Teknik Lingkungan-Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS), soedjono@enviro.its.ac.id 33. Eddy Prayitno, ID-CONFIG, mataharitimoer@id-config.org 34. 35. Edi Saiidi Erickson Sijabat ( penulis tema inequality ), WVI 36. Eva Anne Jeanne Sabdono, Yayasan Emong Lansia Indonesia (NGO) Depok, evasab@yahoo.com ;

37.

Febri Hendri A.A, ICW, febri_hendri@antikorupsi.org

38.

Fita Rizki Utami, Aliansi Remaja Independen

39.

Gregor Hadi Nitihardjo, SOS Childrens Villages Indonesia, Bandung, hadi@sos.or.d

40.

Hamonangan Nasution, OPSI ( Indonesian Sex Worker Organization ), Jakarta, program.officer.opsi@gmail.com

41.

Hartoyo, Ourvoice, Jakarta, hartoyomdn@gmail.com

42. 43. 44. 45.

Heince Mangesa, Pelkesi Helena Rea, ISAI Heni Setyawati, Grass Root YAKKUM Herniette Imelda, Institute for Essential Services Reform (IESR), imelda@iesr.or.id

46.

I Nengah Latra, YAKKUM Bali, yakkum_bali@yahoo.com

47.

Imanche Al Rachman Hasim Saudah, LSM Komunitas Masyarakat Desa Sulawesi Tenggara (LSM KomnasdesaSultra), Kendari, imanche_alrachman@yahoo.com , komnasdesa@gmail.com

48.

Imanuel Kemenangan Ginting, YAyasan Ate Keleng GBKP, Deli Serdang, parpem_gbkp@yahoo.com

49.

Indraswari, Universitas Katolik Parahyangan, indras@unpar.ac.id (official), indrayayan@yahoo.com

50.

Irawan Saptono, ISAI

51.

Ishak Salim, AcSI Makassar, isangkilang@yahoo.com

65. 66.

Medawati Silalahi, Perdhaki, Misbahul Munir, Fosnu Probolinggo, mm_aa.fosnu@yahoo.com

52. 53.

Jonna, Josef Purnama Widyatmadja, YPKS/CDC Solo, jwidyatmadja@gmail.com 68. 67.

Michael Bhoelman, TIFA, mbhoelman@tifafoundation.org Muhammad ilham, Transparency International Indonesia, milham@ti.or.id

54.

Kadek Lisa Ismiandewi, Forum Fair Trade Indonesia (FFTI), info@forumfairtradeindonesia.org 69.

Muhammad Ismail, Dewan Pengurus Cabang GERKATIN (Gerakan untuk Kesejahteraan Tuna Rungu Indonesia) Kota Surakarta, office@gerkatinsolo.or.id

55. 56.

Kartini, KPI Jawa Tengah, Kartono Mohamad, Tobacco Control Support Center Indonesian Public Health Association, Jakarta, mohnuh2002@yahoo.com 70.

Muhammad Joni Yulianto, SIGAB (Organisasi Disable), Yogyakarta, yulianto@sigab.org

57. 58. 59.

Ketty Kadarwati, USAID Kukuh Sanyoto, ISAI Liliane Priscella Amalo, YAYASAN TANPA BATAS YTB, liliane_amalo@yahoo.com 71.

Mulyadi Hadiwiyono, Social Analysis and Research Institute (SARI), Solo, cak_mul@yahoo.com

60.

Luh Riniti Rahayu Sukaja, LSM Bali Sruti, rin_iti@yahoo.com, lsm_balisruti@yahoo.com

72.

Mulyadi Prajitno, JARI Celebes Raya, Makassar, alif.amanda@gmail.com

73.

Musdah Mulia, ICRP (Indonesian Conference on Religion for Peace), Jakarta, m-ulia@indo.net.id

61.

Lutfi Khoiri Rosyida, CENAS (Centre of Asian Studies), info@cenasofindonesia.org 74. 75.

Musfarayani, ISAI Nila Wardani, Ruang Mitra Perempuan (RUMPUN), Malang, nilawardani99@yahoo.co.id, rumpun@indo.net.id

62.

Lutfiyah Hanim, Aliansi Petani Indonesia, Jakarta, lutfiyah.hanim@gmail.com , seknas@api.or.id

63. 64.

M.Zacky, PKBI Jogjakarta Mahmudi Yusbi, Yayasan Wisma Cheshire Young Voices Indonesia, mudi.atjeh@gmail.com , yvindonesia.cheshire@hotmail.co.id, mahesh.chandrasekar@lcdisability.org

76.

Ninuk Widyantoro, Yayasan Kesehatan Perempuan

77.

NUR HIKMAH, PR TB Aisyiyah, nurhikmah@pr-tbaisyiyah.or.id

78.

Panji Surya Sahetapy, Yayasan Wisma Cheshire Young Voices Indonesia (a

project of Leonard heshire Disability) yvindonesia.cheshire@hotmail.co.id, suryasahetapy@yahoo.com, mahesh.chandrasekar@lcdisability.org 79. 80. Pardamean Napitu, OPSI Patricia Miranda Wattimena, Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara / Indigenous Peoples Alliance of the Archipelago (Indigeneous Organization) Jakarta, patricia@aman.or.id 81. Paulus Rahmat, VIVAT International Indonesia (VIVAT Indonesia) Jakarta, vivatindonesia@gmail.com 82. 83. Rabasia, KPI Sulawesi selatan Raden Pramesa Narakusuma, Yayasan Gugah Nurani Indonesia, Jakarta, pramesa@gnindonesia.org 84. Ramida Katharina Sinaga, PESADA (Perkumpulan Sada Ahmo), Dairi, officesidikalang@pesada.org 85. Ranie Ayu Hapsari, YAKKUM Sleman, azhima_rn@yahoo.co.id 86. Ratna Yunita, Save the Children, ratna.yunita@savethechildren.org 87. Rekson Silaban, KSBSI (trade union), Jakarta, Reksonsilaban@hotmail.com 88. Risnawati Utami, KONAS/OHANA, Yogyakarta 89. 90. Riza Boris, TIFA Rizal Malik, Tifa Foundation, malik.rizal@gmail.com , riza@tifafoundation.org 91. Rofah Makin, PSLD UIN

92.

Rohimah, Sekolah Perempuan untuk Perdamaian, Jakarta, empowerment@amanindonesia.org

93.

Ronny Hudiprakoso, Pusat Kajian Disabilitas TAGO, Semarang, disabilitas@yahoo.com

94.

Rosniaty, YASMIB (Swadaya Mitra Bangsa) Mamuju, Sulselbar, rosazis@yahoo.com ; rosniatyazis@gmail.com ; rosniatypanguriseng@yasmib.org

95.

Rubikem, ORA Kebokuning, Yogyakarta

96. 97. 98. 99.

Said Iqbal, KSPI Salmi Rodli, PPNI Gresik Sarjono, Grass Root YAKKUM Sigit Wijayanta, YAKUM Solo, wijayanta@yahoo.com

100. Silvia Chandra, Organisasi Perubahan Sosial Indonesia (OPSI), (Community Organization) Riau, silviachandra36@yahoo.co.id 101. Siti Khadijah, HAPSARI ( Himpunan Serikat Perempuan Indonesia) Sumut, hapsari1@indosat.net.id 102. Siti Mariam / Maria Bo Niok, Pokja (Kelompok Kerja) PUG Pengarusutamaan Gender, Wonosobo, maria_gh69@yahoo.com 103. Sri Kusyuniarti, Rutgers WPF 104. Sri Nyamini, Himpunan Kerukunan Petani Maju (HKPM), Rembang, 081390398440 105. Sri Utari Setyawati, Advance Family Planning under Cipta Cara Padu

Foundation (CCPF), s.utari@ccpindonesia.org ; sriutari@cbn.net.id 106. Subiyanto, Dewan Pimpinan Pusat Konfederasi Serikat Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia (DPP KSPSI) (Trade Union) Jakarta, dpp.kspsi@yahoo.com, subiyantopudin@yahoo.co.id 107. Sudiyanto, Grass Root YAKKUM 108. Sukasmanto, IRE, Yogyakarta 109. Sulistiyo, PGRI 110. Sultan Fariz, Yayasan Pendidikan Liga Inong Aceh /YP-LINA (Aceh Womens League Education Foundation), Bireuen Banda Aceh, tengkufariz@gmail.com 111. Sumaiya Islam, TIFA 112. Sunarman, PPRBM 113. Surya Tjandra, TURC (mitra FES) 114. Suryandaru, DPD Pertuni Jawa Tengah, ndarusurya@gmail.com 115. Sutami, PKMD Lestari Jaqya, Grobogan 116. Sutriyatmi, Koalisi Perempuan Indonesia, Jakarta 117. Sutrisno, Koalisi Rakyat untuk Keadilan Perikanan (KIARA), Medan 118. Tabrani Yunis, Center for Community Development and Education (CCDE) Banda Aceh, ccde.aceh@gmail.com 119. Tara Singh Bam, International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union) (INGO), tsbam@theunion.org 120. Timbul Siregar, OPSI (Organisasi Pekerja Seluruh Indonesia)

121. Titik Hartini, Association for Community Empowerment (ACE), titik_ace@yahoo.co.id , thartini2012@gmail.com 122. Tri Asmiyanto, WRIYogyakarta, 123. Trihadi Saptoadi, WVI 124. Tunggal Pawestri, HIVOS, tpawestri@hivos.or.id 125. Unifah Rosyidi, PGRI 126. Vimala Asty Fitra Tunggal, Parisaddha Buddha Dharma Niciren Sosyu Indonesia (Organization of Nichiren Shoshu Buddhism in Indonesia) Jakarta, vimala.asty@yahoo.com 127. Wa Ode Asmawati, Central Board Of Aisyiyah-Social Welfare Division, Jakarta, achakhadir22@yahoo.com 128. Wicaksono Sarosa, Kemitraan 129. Wiratmo Probo, ISAI 130. Yuda Kusumaningsih, Gerakan Pemberdayaan Swara Perempuan, (GPSP) yuda_irlang@yahoo.co.id ; yayasan_gpsp@yahoo.com 131. Yulianus Septer Manufandu, INFID/Jerat, Papua, 132. Yurlianti Adimala, Sekolah Perempuan Sintuwu Raya, Poso, yaniez_27@yahoo.com (081354240988) 133. Yusranetty, KPI Sumbawa 134. Yuyun Wahyuningrum, Human Rights Working Group, Jakarta 135. Zumrotin, Womens Health Foundation, Jakarta, zumrotin@gmail.com

LIST OF INTERNATIONAL PARTICIPANTS OF CSO GLOBAL FORUM AND OUTREACH DAY AT THE 4TH HLP MEETING ON THE POST-2015 DEVELOPMENT AGENDA GOODWAY HOTEL NUSA DUA, BALI - INDONESIA 1. Abhishek Upadhyay, Convener, Post 2015 Youth Consultations, IndiaIIT Delhi | JOSH | Ph: +91-7838692214, abhishekgold@gmail.com , India 2. ADAM LAIDLAW, CHIEF EXECUTIVEWATERAID, adam.laidlaw@wateraid.org.au , NEW ZEALAND 3. 4. Agustin DeMidielis, Education International Ahmed Swapan Mahmud, Beyond 2015, ahmed.swapan@gmail.com , BANGLADESH 5. Aidan Harris, Open Society Foundations, aidan.harris@opensocietyfoundations. org, UK 6. Aileen Yap, National Youth AW Singapore, nyaac@singnet.com.sg , Singapore 7. 8. Alison Margaret TATE, ITUC, alison.tate@ituc-csi.org, AUSTRALIA Amy Miller Taylor, CIVICUS: World Alliance for Citizen Participation (International Network), amy.taylor@civicus.org, South Africa 9. Analin Vongsavanh, Vientienne Youth Centre for Health and Development, a_analin@hotmail.com , LAOS 10. Andres Alejandro Barrios Noya, PCFS, abarrios@iboninternational.org , BOLIVIA 21. 22. 23. 20. 19. 18. 17. 16. 15. 14. 13. 12. 11. Angelo Gavrielatos, Australian Education Union, angelo@aeufederal.org.au, Australian Antonia Wulff, Education International, antonia.wulff@ei-ie.org , Finnish Antonio Freitas, Forum NGO Timor Leste (FONGTIL), disistimorleste@disis-tl.org , EAST TIMOR Anush Khachtryan, Society without Violence, anush.khachatryan@swv.am, ARMENIA Azra Talat Sayad, Roots for Equity, azra.sayad@gmail.com, Cai Yiping, Development Alternatives with Women for New Era (DAWN), caiyiping2000@hotmail.com, CHINA Caroline Orobosa Usikpedo-Omoniye, Niger Delta Womens Movement for Peace and Development, nigerdeltawomen@gmail.com, NIGERIA Catherine Setchell, c.setchell@isd.ac.uk , UK Cheng-tsung Lu, Asia NGOs Alliance International Headquarters S.A.R, rescue.taiwan@msa.hinet.net , Taiwan Clare Coffey, Action Aid, Clare.coffey@actionaid.org, UK Daniel Wilard, FES, daniel@fes.or.id Danny Bums, diburns@ids.ac.uk, UK DAPHNE VILLANUEVA CANDELARIA, CHRISTIAN AID (INGO),

dvillanueva@christian-aid.org, Philipine 24. Davids Etyang, East Africa Trade Union Confederation, (workers/trade union), davieeaty@yahoo.co.uk, davids@eatuc.info, Tanzania 25. 26. Dennis Sinyolo, Education International, dennis.sinyolo@ei-ie.org, Dierdre Williams, Open Society Foundations, dierdre.williams@opensocietyfoundati ons.org, Trinidad and Tobago 27. Dieu Nuong Nguyen, Asia Injury Prevention, Foundation (AIPF) (NGO), nuong.nguyen@aipf-vietnam.org, Vietnam 28. Dina Lumbantobing, ASPBAE-Asia Pacific Association Network, lumban27@yahoo.com, Mumbai 29. 30. 31. Dinah Fuentestina, WSPA-AP, dinahf@gmail.com, Philippines Doris Mpoumou, IPPF/WHR, dmpoumou@ippfwhr.org Francisca Gabriela Cruz Salazar, FENACOPEC, fenacopec@hotmail.com, gabrielacruzs@hotmail.com, EQUADOR 32. Fraser William Reilly-King, Canadian Council for International-Cooperation (and the CSO Platform for Development Effectiveness) (NGO), freillyking@ccic.ca, Canada 33. GAGAN SIRIRAM SETHI, CHAIR PERSON [ JANVIKAS / CENTRE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE ], gaganssethi@gmail.com, INDIAN 34. George Asiimwe, ESAFF (Farmers organization), asiimwegk@gmail.com, advocacy.esaff@gmail.com, UGANDA

35.

Gomer Butala Padong, Training, Development Cooperation and Advocacy OfficerPHILIPPINE SOCIAL ENTERPRISE NETWORK (PhilSEN), gomerpadong@gmail.com, Philippines

36.

Gopal Lamsal, NGO Federation of Nepal (NFN), gplamsal@gmail.com, NEPAL

37. 38.

Grazyna Pulawska, ASEF, grazyna.pulawska@asef.org, GURU NAIK, ChildFund Alliance, gnaik@indonesia.childfund.org, INDIAN

39.

Hanan El-Amin Mudathir, Environmental Initiative Organisation for Sustainable Development, hanan_muddathir@yahoo.co.uk, SUDAN

40.

Herni Ramdlaningrum, Family for Every Child, (International Network), Herni.Ramdalingrum@familyforeveryc hild.org, UK

41.

Heve Elizabeth Otero, Global Movement for Children LAC (Latin America and Caribe), GMFC-LAC (International coalition/network), heveotero10@yahoo.com.ar, redlamyc@gurisesunidos.org.u, Uruguay

42. 43.

Hua Geng, GCAP-China, genghua2010@gmail.com, CHINA INDU CAPOOR, CENTRE FOR HEALTH EDUCATION, TRAINING AND NUTRITION AWARENESS (CHETNA), chetna456@vsnl.net, chetna456@gmail.com, INDIAN

44.

Irina Costache, Astra Network, irina_costa@yahoo.com , costache_irina@phd.ceu.hu, ROMANIA

45.

Isagani Rodriguez Serrano, Social Watch Philippines, info@socialwatchphilippines.org, iserrano@prrm.org, Philippines 59.

Organisation, lamia.talebani@yahoo.com, IRAQ Laura Cirstina Breton Despradel, CIPAF Centro De Investogacion Para La Accion Femenina, lauracbd@gmail.com, DOMINICAN REPUBLIC 60. Laurence Christopher Gray, World Vision International, Asia Pacific Region (INGO), Laurence_gray@wvi.org, Thailand 61. Leah Patricia Mulungama Chatta Chipepa, Akina Mama Wa Africa, leah@akinamamawaafrika.org, UGANDA 62. 63. Leo Williams, Beyond 2015, lwilliams@beyond2015.org, British Liliana Maria Marcos Barba, WHO, lilianamarcosbarba@yahoo.es, Switzerland 64. 65. Lola Nayar, Outlook Magazine, lola.nayar@gmail.com, Indian Ly Sam, Cooperation Committee for Cambodia (CCC), ly.sam@ccccambodia.org, CAMBODIA 66. M Rezaul Karim Chowdury, Equity and Justice Working Group Bangladesh (EquityBD), reza@coastbd.org, BANGLADESH 67. Mahmuda Akhter, Asia Pacific Regional Network for Early Childhood (ARNEC), mahmuda.ichd@gmail.com, Bangladesh 68. 69. 70. MAKIKO IMAI, Rio+20 NGO Forum, makiko@yukikazet.com, JAPAN Mar Candela, Education International, mar.candela@ei-ie.org, Belgium Mariano De Donatis, GCAP Latin America,

46.

James Soh, National Youth AW Singapore, Jamessoh@nyaa.org Singapore

47.

James Wicken, WaterAid (INGO), james.wicken@wateraid.org.au, Australia

48. 49.

Jana Aboudiab, Together to Palestine, ila-falastin@hotmail.com, LEBANESE Jee-Eun Jun, Korea NGO Council for Overseas Development Cooperation, eun0726@ngokcoc.or.kr, SOUTH KOREA

50. 51.

Jorge Mario Balbis Prez, Alop, jbalbis@alop.org.mx, MEXICO Jose Cayobit, Federation of Free Workers (FFW), jdcayobit@yahoo.com, Philippines

52.

Josefa Goergina Muoz Pavn, RENICCC LATINDADD, georginanic@gmail.com, NICARAGUA

53.

Junice Lirza Melgar, Likhaan Center for Women's Health, Inc., office@likhaan.org, junice@likhaan.org, Filipino

54. 55. 56.

Justin Michael Kilcullen, Concord, jkilcullen@trocaire.ie, Ireland Kate Dooley, Save the Children, UK Kemberley Julie-Anne Gittens, CPDC, projectofficer@cpdcngo.org, cpdc@caribsurf.com, BARBADOS

57. 58.

Kirsty Nowlan, World Vision, kirsty.nowlan@wvi.org, Australia LAMAA JAMAL MOHAMMED AL TALABANI (Lamia Jamal Talebani), Voice of Independent Women

mariano.dedonatis@whiteband.org, ARGENTINA 71. MARILOU PANTUA JUANITO, VSO Bahaginan Foundation Inc (NGO), malou.juanito@vsobahaginan.org, Philipine 72. MARK DEARN, IBON International, mdearn@iboninternational.org, PHILIPPINES 73. Mary Claire J. Miranda, JSAPMDD / Jubilee South Asia Pacific of Debt and Development, clairemiranda08@gmail.com, PHILIPPINES 74. 75. Masaki Inaba, GCAP Japan, masaki.inaba@gmail.com, Japan Matthew Simonds, International Trade Union Confederation, matt.simonds@ituc-csi.org, USA 76. Michel Anglade, Save the Children (INGO), michel.anglade@savethechildren.org, Singapore 77. 78. MINGMA BOMZAN, LDCS Watch, prernazan@gmail.com, NEPAL Misun Woo, Asia Pacific Forum on Women, Law and Development, misun@apwld.org, Thailand 79. 80. Mohammed Sadi, ESPACE Associatif, sadysamy@yahoo.fr, MAROCCO Mosharraf Hossain, ADD International, mosharraf1964@gmail.com, BANGLADESH 81. Murali Padmanabha, CBM, murali.padmanabhan@cbmsaro.org, Indian 82. Mustafa Talpur, WaterAid (INGO), mustafatalpur@wateraid.org,

83.

Mwangi Waituru, Seed Institute / CoChair at Beyond 2015, GCAP Kenya, mwangi@seedinstitute.com, Kenya

84. 85. 86.

Nalini Mary anne Vaz, GCAP India, nal70@hotmail.com, INDIA Nalini Sinah, ArrOW, Nalini@arrow.org Natalia Myhailivna Shcherbata, Ukrainian women-Bar Association, nshcherbata@gmail.com , spilkaur@sovamua.com, UKRAINE

87.

Navanamy Semmanachelv Jeremiah Thiruchandran, Womens Education and Research Centre, womedre@sltnet.lk, Srilangka

88.

Nebila Abdulmelik, FEMNET (African Womens Development Communication Network), communication@femnet.or.ke, KENYA

89.

Neva Frecheville, Beyond 2015/CAFOD, nfrecheville@cafod.org.uk, British

90. 91.

Ngeta KABIRI, UNU--IAS JAPAN, nkabiri@hotmail.com, KENYA Nooria Safai, Womens capacity buidling and Development Organization (WCBDO), info.wcbdo@gmail.com, AFGANISTAN

92.

Obaidullah Mehak, HRRAC, obaidullah.mehak@afghanadvocacy.or g.af, AFGANISTAN

93.

Patricia M. Sarenas, The Caucus of Development NGO Network (CodeNGO), pmsarenas@gmail.com, PHILIPPINES

94.

PETER NIGEL PROVE, ECUMENICAL ADVOCACY ALLIANCE (INGO), pprove@e-alliance.ch, Switzerland

95.

Pooja Parvati Wada Na Todo Abhiyan, pooja.parvati@gmail.com, INDIA

96. 97.

Ramo Armandha, CPGSD, sramo@iboninternational.org, RASHIDAH ABDULLAH, REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS ADVOCACY ALLIANCE MALAYSIA[RRAAM], rashidahabd@yahoo.com, MALAYSIAN

110. Sofia Garcia Garcia, SOS Children's Villages, sofia.garcia-garcia@soskd.org, Spanish 111. Sul-Ah JANG, Korea NGO Council for Overseas Development Cooperation (KCOC), jsa@ngokcoc.or.kr, SOUTH KOREA 112. Sunit Bagree, SIGHTSAVERS (INGO), sbagree@sightsavers.org, UK 113. Susan Hopgood, Education International, Australia 114. Tashi Choden, Centre for Bhutan Studies, tashi.choden79@yahoo.com, Bhutan 115. Teresita Vistro, AMIHAN, The Philippines 116. Thomas Betjeman, YAKKUM, amalakassogue@gmail.com, USA 117. Thomas Fry, ACORD, tom.fry@acordinternational.org, UK 118. Tom Thomas, Praxis, tomt@praxisindia.org 119. Tran Thuy An, Vietnam Association for Protection of Childrens Rights, ms.thuyan@gmail.com, Vietnam 120. Valeska Hesse, FES, valeska@fes.or.id 121. Virginia Tracy Kamova, Global Advocacy Coordinator, Sightsavers, vkamowa@sightsavers.org, Malawi 122. Viviane Castro, Associacion Chilena de ONG ACCIO, viviane.castro@accionag.cl, CHILE 123. Wardarina, APWLD, rina@apwld.org, THAILAND 124. Willice Onyango, Wateraid, willice@iyckeny.org, Kenya 125. Yahya Khamis Msangi, ITUC-Africa, yahya.msangi@ituc-africa.org, TOGO 126. Yaeko Higo Shikata, UNU ISP, higo@unu.edu, Japan

98. 99.

Rayyan Hassan, NJO Forum on ADB, rayyon@forum.adb.org Rileem Dulay, CDDE, secretariat@csopartnership.org,

100. Rossy Peregra, ILC-DR, rozy.peregra@gmail.com, Rep. Dom 101. Roy Anunciacion, Ibon International 102. Roy Bautista Velarde, Managing Trustee at Philippine Network of Rural Development Institutes, reuelvelarde@yahoo.com, Philippines 103. Salina Sanou, ACORD Nairobi, salina.sanou@acordinternational.org, KENYA 104. Samual Dean, Florence A. Tolbert and the Disabled Advocates Incorporated, fatdaAid@gmail.com, LIBERIA 105. Seonghoon (Anselmo) LEE , ADA/KCOC, alee7080@gmail.com, SOUTH KOREA 106. Shama Dossa, ARROW, shama@arrow.org.my, Canadian 107. Shiham Aishath, Society for Health Education, aishath.shiham@she.org.mv, aishath.shiham.2011@gmail.com, Maldivian 108. Sirivella Deva John Merina Prasad, National Dalit Movement for Justice, sdjmprasad@ncdhr.or.in, INDIA 109. Snannon Kowalski, International Womens Health, skonalski@iwh.org, USA

127. Yen-Ching Yen, Asia NGOs Alliance International, Headquarters S.A.R, ingo@asia-ngos.org, Taiwan 128. Yesol Chun, Korea Human Rights Foundation, Piero88@naver.com, South Korea

129. Ymin Jeong, Korea Human Rights Foundation, Yonin-V@naver.com, South Korea 130. Ying-ting Lu, Asia NGOs Alliance International Headquarters S.A.R, rescue.taipei@msal.hinet.net, Taiwan

Annex 6. Photos

ANNEX 7. Media Coverage

Ketegasan SBY Dibutuhkan Negara Berkembang Monday, 25 March 2013 19:57 Published Date

Suasana pertemuan High Level Panel di Bali (GATRAnews/dok - Helena Rea)

Nusa Dua, GATRAnews - Perdana Menteri Inggris, David Cameron tidak hadir dalam pertemuan Panel Tingkat Tinggi (High Level Panel - HLP) di Hotel Westin, Nusa Dua, Bali, Senin (25/3). Absennya Cameron dikecam oleh para anggota dan peserta Panel HLP. Kondisi ini menunjukkan masih minimnya komitmen dari negara-negara maju terhadap agenda Millenium Development Goals (MDGs) pasca 2015. Padahal, Cameron telah dijadualkan sebagai salah satu dari tiga pemimpin pertemuan HLP bersama Presiden Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dan Presiden Liberia Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. Hasil pertemuan HLP pada 26-27 Maret 2013 menjadi rekomendasi yang akan diserahkan kepada Sekretaris Jenderal PBB, Ban Ki-Moon. Kekhawatiran mendasar yang menjadi perhatian utama dari Koalisi Indonesia dan Koalisi Internasional dalam pertemuan tersebut adalah tidak adanya komitmen dari negara-negara maju terhadap upaya pasca 2015. Sejauh ini yang menjadi ukuran pendekatan agenda pasca 2015 adalah pendekatan pembangunan berbasis pasar, yang berarti perluasan pasar dan meminimalkan tanggung jawab negara. Seharusnya pembangunan yang didanai dan didorong oleh negara harus melalui regulasi pendanaan., kata Sugeng Bahagijo Direktur INFID dan Panitia Pengarah Global

Sementara itu, Paul Polman, CEO Unilever, mengatakan bahwa ketimpangan yang terjadi di dunia akibat adanya ketidak percayaan baik itu di kalangan CSO, swasta maupun adalah pemerintah. cara yang Akuntabilitas tepat untuk dan transparansi saling membangun

kepercayaan itu, kata Polman di forum Private Sector

Leaders Roundtable. Pernyataan Polman tersebut juga

didukung oleh George Soros yang juga berbicara di forum yang juga sama, yang menyatakan bahwa untuk bahwa, pasca untuk 2015 itu perlu dibutuhkan aturan main dan hukum yang jelas. Soros menyatakan dimasukan jaminan atas akses hukum dan keadilan bagi semua pihak, terutama bagi masyarakat marginal dan terpinggirkan Ada tiga point utama yang menjadi kata kunci dan ditekankan oleh CSOs sebagai komitmen bersama, yakni kepemimpinan, ketimpangan, dan keberlanjutan lingkungan berdasarkan prinsip yang universal. Sementara tata cara pelaksanaannya didasarkan pada kekhasan setiap negara. Sepanjang 10 tahun terakhir, ketimpangan pendapatan di Indonesia meningkat. Pada 2011 dalam Indeks GINI (GINI Ratio standar ukuran ketimpang pendapatan) seperti ketimpangan meningkat menjadi 0,41. Sementara ketimpangan di bidang non pendapatan, akses terhadap pelayan publik juga sangat timpang, banyak daerah miskin tidak ada guru dan tidak ada bidan. Ini berakibat pada tingginya ketimpangan

CSOs

Forum

on

Post-

2015 dalam siaran pers yang diterima GATRAnews.

terhadap angka kematian ibu di 10 provinsi (antara lain Banten, Papua, NTT). Hal ini seharusnya menjadi agenda utama dan harus diangkat dan diputuskan sebagai target agenda pembangunan pasca 2015. Argumen dan penjelasan

khususnya yang bersahabat terhadap kaum disabilitas, lansia, dan anak-anak. Sejauh ini, ketegasan SBY dalam kepemimpinannya di HLP dibutuhkan untuk merangkul negara-negara menengah dan negara-negara miskin dalam memperkuat komitmen terhadap pembangunan yang berkelanjutan. Ketegasan SBY penting agar kerangka pembangunan yang diusulkan paska MDGs 2015 bisa menguntungkan seluruh warga dunia, terutama mereka yang berada di negara miskin dan berkembang, khususnya terhadap negosiasi-negosiasi yang selama ini tidak menguntungkan negara miskin dan berkembang, sambung Mickael B. Hoelman, Manager Program Yayasan Tifa dan Panitia Pengarah Global CSOs Forum on Post-2015. (Nhi)

teknis empiris sudah ada, yang belum ada yang adalah kepimpinan politik dari co-chairs oleh Pak SBY, kata Sugeng Bahagijo. Targetnya setiap negara menurunkan Indeks GINI dari 0,4 menjadi 0,3. Di sisi lain pendapatan untuk suara kaum perempuan, harus ada realisasi kuota kepemimpinan perempuan tidak hanya jabatan publik tetapi juga jabatan swasta. Perhatian lainnya adalah pembangunan (mengikutsertkan yang ideal bersifat yang berarti inklusif ada masyarakat)

kesempatan sosial dan pelayanan publik untuk semua

http://www.gatra.com/international/26872-ketegasan-sby-dibutuhkan-untuk-negara-berkembang.html

Kamis, 28 Maret 2013

AGENDA PEMBANGUNAN PASCA-2015

Keterlibatan Sektor Swasta Bakal Digenjot Nusa Dua, Kompas - Keterlibatan sektor swasta dalam menyukseskan pembangunan berkelanjutan dan berkeadilan bakal digenjot dalam Agenda Pembangunan Pasca-2015. Hal itu menimbulkan kekhawatiran adanya pelemahan tanggung jawab negara, terutama pemerintah negara maju, kepada negara-negara miskin atau rawan miskin. Hasil Peningkatan peran sektor swasta diarahkan Perdana Menteri Inggris David Cameron, Rabu (27/3), melalui video (bukan konferensi video) pada pembukaan Pertemuan Panel Tingkat Tinggi Agenda Pembangunan Pasca-2015 di Nusa Dua, Bali. Ia menjadi co-chair panel bersama Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dan Presiden Liberia Ellen Johnson Sirleaf. Presiden Yudhoyono mengatakan, hasil perumusan Bali Cameron menyatakan, peningkatan peran sektor swasta dan investasi merupakan cara terbaik untuk memacu pembangunan yang berkelanjutan. Hal itu diperjelas Justine Greening, Menteri Pembangunan Internasional Inggris, yang mewakili Cameron di Bali. Kita harus fokus mengentaskan mereka yang termiskin dan menjaga kondisinya berkelanjutan. Tidak hanya peran LSM, tetapi juga perlu kontribusi sektor swasta, katanya dalam konferensi pers, Rabu petang, bersama Presiden Yudhoyono dan Presiden Sirleaf. Sekretaris Komite Nasional Perumusan Visi dan Agenda Pembangunan Pasca-2015 Heru Prasetyo menyatakan telah memperkirakan hal itu dan menilai tidak menjadi masalah. Arah pembahasan Agenda Pembangunan Pasca2015 dinilai menyambung antara Tujuan Pembangunan Milenium (MDG) dan Tujuan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (SDG) seperti hasil pertemuan Rio+20 Earth Summit, 20-22 Juni 2012. Direktur Eksekutif International NGO Forum on Indonesian Development Sugeng Bahagijo mengatakan, secara konsep dan implementasi tidak ada korelasi antara sumber Kami setuju bahwa kemakmuran membutuhkan lebih dari pertumbuhan ekonomi yang adil. Kita membutuhkan transformasi ekonomi dan sosial yang memberdayakan seseorang untuk mengangkat dirinya dari kemiskinan, katanya. Transformasi harus melibatkan pertumbuhan yang berkelanjutan dengan ekuitas, manajemen yang transparan akan pengelolaan sumber daya alam, dan kontribusi aktif sektor swasta. (ICH) Pasca-2015 diajukan ke New York pada Mei 2013. Hasil tersebut diharapkan bisa dibahas dalam Sidang Umum PBB pada September 2013. Secara garis besar, ia menyatakan, pertumbuhan ekonomi saja tidak cukup. Sebagaimana di New York (Amerika Serikat), London (Inggris), dan Monrovia (Liberia), ia menekankan, pemberantasan kemiskinan menjadi fokus. Kebutuhan dasar individu di tingkat rumah tangga harus dipenuhi. Kebutuhan itu meliputi pelayanan kesehatan, pendidikan, pangan, energi, air bersih, dan perumahan. Pendekatan yang dilakukan dalam Agenda Pembangunan Pasca-2015 ditekankan perlindungan pada pertumbuhan inklusif, kesetaraan, keamanan, lingkungan, perdamaian, kesepakatan pertemuan Bali Pasca-2015 yang dibagikan di pusat media menyatakan ada empat kunci. Salah satunya, cara pendanaan melalui komitmen untuk meningkatkan dan menggunakan sumber dari sektor swasta, yaitu investasi, tanggung jawab sosial, dan mekanisme pasar. Ditekankan pula pengaturan regulasi pajak dan arus keuangan ilegal. pendanaan dari sektor swasta dan SDG. Seharusnya pembangunan yang didanai dan didorong oleh negara melalui regulasi pendanaan bersifat wajib. Bukan sektor swasta yang menentukan, kata Sugeng. Hal senada dikemukakan Ratna Yunita, Advocacy Adviser Agenda Pembangunan Pasca-2015 pada Save The Children.

keadilan, dan kebebasan.

http://cetak.kompas.com/read/2013/03/28/01594989/keterlibatan.sektor.swasta.bakal.digenjot

Tax emerges as crucial issue in post-2015 development talks Members of the UN high-level panel meet in Bali this week. Tax evasion is expected to feature in the discussions guardian.co.uk, Monday 25 March 2013 10.00 GMT

Nigeria's finance minister, Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, wants action on tax evasion. Photograph: Pius Utomi Ekpei/AFP/Getty Images Tax evasion by multinationals and corrupt leaders has emerged as a key issue ahead of the third substantive meeting of a UN high-level panel to discuss a framework for development after 2015. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, the Nigerian finance minister and The theme of this week's meeting in the sweltering Indonesian resort island of Bali is global partnership, the orphan child of the millennium development goals (MDGs). Devoid of clear targets, MDG8 talks in general terms about an open, rule-based trading and financial system, dealing with debt burdens, providing access to affordable essential medicines, and increasing access to new technologies. Goal eight also mentions fostering links between the public and private sector to drive better development. Yet momentum is building up among NGOs, poor countries and some rich countries to ensure that developing countries build up their tax base at a time "I'm really frustrated at these illicit flows," she told the Guardian ahead of the UN high-level panel discussions. "What would it take for G8 and G20 countries to take some specific steps to put pressure on those countries acting as tax havens?" She praised, however, the US, the UK and Switzerland for putting the topic on the agenda. Taxes and transparency will be one of the priorities at the G8 summit, to be chaired by Britain's prime minister, David Cameron, in Northern Ireland in June. member of the UN panel, expressed her exasperation at the lack of appetite so far among many rich countries to take a stronger stand on tax evasion. when aid flows are under pressure, notwithstanding Britain's commitment to meet, this year, the UN target of spending 0.7% of gross national income (GNI) on aid.

Okonjo-Iweala, along with Justine Greening, Britain's international Alisjahbana, development the Indonesian secretary, and Armida planning development

criminal

activities,

including

theft

and

bribery

of

government officials. Nigeria urged rich countries to do more to return stolen assets that were estimated at between $20bn and $40bn by the World Bank in 2007. But out of 30 OECD countries, only the UK, the US, Switzerland and Australia have repatriated funds a total, between 2006 and 2009, of about $277m. It is estimated that for every $1 of aid money spent on strengthening tax regimes in developing countries, $350 can be generated in tax revenues, yet only 0.1% of aid targets tax systems. Greening said that she would use a meeting of the Busan global partnership later this year to push for greater international action on tax and collaboration with the private sector. "As well as helping developing countries build up their tax

minister, co-chair the steering committee of the global partnership that grew out of the Busan aid effectiveness conference in 2011. The committee brings together officials from rich and poor countries and institutions such as the World Bank, the development assistance committee of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the UN development programme. Although below many people's radar few realised the committee was meeting in Bali ahead of the UN panel's discussions the committee is pressing ahead with work on tax, knowledge sharing and a monitoring framework on development effectiveness, issues that conceivably fall under MDG8. Taxation is also a clarion call for NGOs, many of which met over the weekend to agree their positions before meeting with members of the UN panel. The panel's three co-chairs President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, of Liberia, President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, of Indonesia, with Greening deputising for Cameron, who will be absent because of a diary clash hold their own meeting with the UN panel on Wednesday. Taxation has emerged as a key issue in terms of global partnerships as rich countries have failed to deliver on trade the Doha trade round that was supposed to have benefited developing countries remains moribund and development assistance is shrinking because of austerity in the west. The sums at stake are enormous.

systems and a strong business environment, we're using every opportunity in this G8 year to push for international action on tax," she said. "We will use the meeting later this year to make sure countries have a firm deadline to get their own house in order." The NGO ActionAid, which has been pushing for changes in international rules that hamper tax collection in developing and developed countries, said what is needed are international tax agreements that safeguard developing countries' taxing rights, help reduce tax competition between different countries, and shed light on tax havens and the tax operations of multinational companies. "A new global partnership for development post-2015

A Nigerian discussion paper in Bali noted that net financial transfers to developing countries over the past decade may well turn out to be negative once illicit flows (tax evasion, money laundering, trade and transfer mispricing by companies, and bribery) are taken into account, although current estimates up to $1tn a year are contested. Tax evasion, it went on, is estimated to account for 60-65% of all illicit flows; 30-35% is attributed to

could realistically help developing countries raise tax revenues to 25% of GDP by 2030, while reducing the corporate tax gap by 20%," said Clare Coffey, ActionAid's post-2015 policy advisor in Bali. "That would generate both significant and sustainable amounts of financing, while helping developing countries to take charge of their own development."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-development/2013/mar/25/tax-crucial-issue-in-post-2015-talks

The Jakarta Pos Post-2015 MDGs: STATE ROLE SBY urged to advocate for developing countries Ina Parlina and Novia D. Rulistia, The Jakarta Post, Nusa Dua | World | Tue, March 26 2013, 11:56 AM

Alert: Soldiers on guard on Monday at the fourth UN High Level Panel on Post-2015 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in Nusa Dua, Bali. The meeting is set to discuss developing a new global development scheme after the MDGs deadline passes in 2015. Antara/Nyoman Budhiana

A 24-member advisory panel will meet on Tuesday after discussions on Monday between scholars, representatives of the public sector, civil society organizations and youth organziations. On Wednesday two of the three cochairs of the Bali High

A world forum of civil society organizations is urging President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to push for greater state responsibility to ensure peoples welfare, especially in developing countries. Discussions on a global post- Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) still lean to a market-based development approach, which means the expansion of the market that minimizes the responsibility of the state, Sugeng Bahagijo of the international NGO the Indonesian Development Forum (INFID), said on Monday in Nusa Dua, Bali.

Level Panel, Yudhoyono and Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, will conclude the talks, while cochair UK Prime Minister David Cameron will participate by video conference. Yudhoyonos actions would be important to ensure that a development framework after 2015 could benefit all citizens, especially the poor and those living in developing countries, said Mickael B. Hoelman, Tifa Foundation program manager. Ahmed Swapan Mahmud of a Bangladesh civil society

The trend is for each country to recognize voluntary action in implementing the global development framework [which] is not binding and would be detrimental to the people. The responsibility of states must be laid out clearly through a binding universal mechanism, Sugeng added.

group, who cochaired the CSOs Global Forum, said that the post development agenda needed universal leadership. We just need real commitment to a just global

partnership, he said.

The organizations urged for any future development framework to replace the inequitable relationship between donor and partner countries, with a global partnership for equitable and inclusive development cooperation. Neva Frecheville of UK-based Cafod said that efforts to eradicate poverty, uphold equity, justice and human rights and to reach environmental sustainability could not be done without binding commitments. She added that governments and decision makers can be afraid to be bold and visionary. Activists also urged the Indonesian government to

Their lands are taken. They used to have 10 hectares of land, now they only have a few hectares, with some even losing all their land and becoming cheap laborers, he said. Suciwati, the widow of the murdered human rights activist Munir Said Thalib, also cited the failure of the government in bringing perpetrators of human rights violations to court. Even if we ask for justice, we still face injustice. While poor people still receive heavy punishment and are often criminalized because they dont have access to justice, Suciwati said.

improve access to law and justice for the poor. Chairman of the Indonesian Legal Aid Institute Foundation (YLBHI) Alvon K. Parma said the poor were often criminalized and lost their rights to welfare. Addressing a panel on access to law and justice on Monday, Alvon cited development plans that disadvantaged the poor. [On plantations] many indigenous people in Sumatra and Papua are marginalized as a result of the governments policies, which arent pro justice, he said.

Kuntoro Mangkusubroto, the head of the Presidential Working Unit for the Supervision and Management of Development (UKP4), said Yudhoyonos approach to sustainable growth with equity had been well received by participants in MDG forums. That means we have placed great attention on many sectors, poor people and economic growth, but also with consideration of the capabilities of all supporting parties, he said.

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/03/26/post-2015-mdgs-sby-urged-advocate-developing-countries.html

Post-2015 High Level talks kick off in Bali

Ina Parlina, The Jakarta Post, Nusa Dua | Headlines | Mon, March 25 2013, 9:14 AM

A- A A+ Paper Edition | Page: 1 The fourth UN High Level Panel on Post-2015 Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) kicks off Monday in Bali, focusing on the global aspect of the agenda, as well as its implementation. The five stakeholder groups the Academic and Research Global Forum, the Public Sector Forum, the Business Community Forum, the Civil Societies (CSOs) Global Forum and the Youth Multi stakeholders Consultation Forum will give voice in Stakeholder Consultation Day discussions and aim to discuss priorities across key stakeholders. The CSOs Global Forum, involving around 300 Kartikasari of the Indonesian Womens Coalition for Justice and Democracy told The Jakarta Post on Sunday. There were also differences in access for people with disabilities or access to public services in developed and developing countries, she added. Michel Anglade, Campaign and Advocacy Director at the Save the Childrens Asia Regional Office, said the figures showing human development improvement in the world did not guarantee equal access for all. When you stop referring to the data, you can see that, for example, indigenous people or people who are being discriminated against, usually that kind of level of development is failing on these people, even if the MDGs are being made on an average level, you can see that these people are lagging behind, he said. The new framework should have a target of covering all segments of the population, he added. The CSOs also urged the panel to address more means of implementation and global partnerships, which have been scheduled for discussion. Mickael Hoelman of Tifa Foundation said the leaders should recognize the importance of having the correct architectural foundation before they started implementation:

representatives from civil society around the world, met in the past two days and discussed strategies and concepts they would present to the panel talks. They concluded that the panel must address inequality issues in all aspects of life during the High Level Panel Post MDGs meeting as unequal progress on human development remains, although the MDGs have managed to reduce poverty. ASEAN has seen the number of people living on less than US$1.25 per day decline to below 20 percent from 45 percent of its total population in 1990. In 2010, one in 34 children in Southeast Asia died before their fifth birthday while in 1990, the number was one in 14 children. Under the MDGs, 600 million people have been lifted out of poverty, 56 million more children can go to school, and 14,000 fewer children are dying from preventable illnesses. Its true that the MDGs managed to reduce poverty, for example in Indonesia. The inequality remains in many aspects of human development such as the disparity between access to health in Jakarta and in Papua, Dian

Whether the architecture gives the same opportunities for the less developed countries or not tomorrows panel needs to address that. A panelist meeting is set for Tuesday, before the co-chairs and panelists meeting on Wednesday that will be attended by President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Liberian President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.

http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2013/03/25/post2015highleveltalkskickbali.html