Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Theory
Bayesian probability Probability interpretations Bayes' theorem Bayes' rule Bayes factor Bayesian network
Hyperparameter Hyperprior
Cromwell's rule
Credible interval
Techniques
Bayesian estimator
Uses
Statistics portal
v t e
In probability theory and statistics, Bayes' theorem (alternatively Bayes' law) is a theorem with two distinct interpretations. In the Bayesian interpretation, it expresses how a subjective degree of belief should rationally change to account for evidence. In the frequentist interpretation, it relates inverse representations of the probabilities concerning two events. In the Bayesian interpretation, Bayes' theorem is fundamental to Bayesian statistics, and has applications in fields including science, engineering, economics (particularly microeconomics), game theory, medicine and law. The application of Bayes' theorem to update beliefs is called Bayesian inference. Bayes' theorem is named after Thomas Bayes (/bez/; 17011761), who first suggested using the theorem to update beliefs. His work was significantly edited and updated by Richard Price before it was posthumously read at the Royal Society. The ideas gained limited exposure until they were independently rediscovered and further developed by Laplace, who first published the modern formulation in his 1812 Thorie analytique des probabilits. Until the second half of the 20th century, the Bayesian interpretation was largely rejected by the mathematics community as unscientific[citation needed]. However, it is now widely accepted. This may have been due to the development of computing, which enabled the successful application of Bayesianism to many complex problems.[1] Sir Harold Jeffreys wrote that Bayes' theorem is to the theory of probability what Pythagoras's theorem is to geometry.[2]
Contents
1 Introductory example 2 Statement and interpretation o 2.1 Bayesian interpretation o 2.2 Frequentist interpretation 3 Forms o 3.1 Events 3.1.1 Simple form 3.1.2 Extended form o 3.2 Random variables 3.2.1 Simple form 3.2.2 Extended form o 3.3 Bayes' rule 4 Derivation o 4.1 For events o 4.2 For random variables 5 Examples o 5.1 Frequentist example o 5.2 Drug testing 6 History 7 Notes 8 Further reading 9 External links
Introductory example
Suppose someone told you they had a nice conversation with someone on the train. Not knowing anything else about this conversation, the probability that they were speaking to a woman is 50%. Now suppose they also told you that this person had long hair. It is now more likely they were speaking to a woman, since most long-haired people are women. Bayes' theorem can be used to calculate the probability that the person is a woman. To see how this is done, let represent the event that the conversation was held with a woman, and denote the event that the conversation was held with a long-haired person. It can be assumed that women constitute half the population for this example. So, not knowing anything else, the probability that occurs is
Suppose it is also known that 75% of women have long hair, which we denote as
given event
is 0.75).
Likewise, suppose it is known that 30% of men have long hair, or , where is the complementary event of , i.e., the event that the conversation was held with a man (assuming that every human is either a man or a woman). Our goal is to calculate the probability that the conversation was held with a woman, given the fact that the person had long hair, or, in our notation, Bayes' theorem, we have: . Using the formula for
where we have used the law of total probability. The numeric answer can be obtained by substituting the above values into this formula. This yields
i.e., the probability that the conversation was held with a woman, given that the person had long hair, is about 71%.
The meaning of this statement depends on the interpretation of probability ascribed to the terms:
Bayesian interpretation
Main article: Bayesian probability In the Bayesian (or epistemological) interpretation, probability measures a degree of belief. Bayes' theorem then links the degree of belief in a proposition before and after accounting for evidence. For example, suppose somebody proposes that a biased coin is twice as likely to land heads than tails. Degree of belief in this might initially be 50%. The coin is then flipped
a number of times to collect evidence. Belief may rise to 70% if the evidence supports the proposition. For proposition
and evidence
, . . .
, the posterior, is the degree of belief having accounted for provides for
For more on the application of Bayes' theorem under the Bayesian interpretation of probability, see Bayesian inference.
Frequentist interpretation
Illustration of frequentist interpretation with tree diagrams. Bayes' theorem connects conditional probabilities to their inverses. In the frequentist interpretation, probability measures a proportion of outcomes. For example, suppose an experiment is performed many times. property , and that with property . , and property out of outcomes with property out of those with . is the proportion of outcomes with is the proportion of outcomes with the proportion of those with
The role of Bayes' theorem is best visualized with tree diagrams, as shown to the right. The two diagrams partition the same outcomes by and in opposite orders, to obtain the inverse probabilities. Bayes' theorem serves as the link between these different partitionings.
Forms
Events
Simple form For events and , provided that
In a Bayesian inference step, the probability of evidence is constant for all models The posterior may then be expressed as proportional to the numerator:
Extended form Often, for some partition in terms of probability: and of the event space, the event space is given or conceptualized . It is then useful to eliminate using the law of total
Random variables
Diagram illustrating the meaning of Bayes' theorem as applied to an event space generated by continuous random variables and . Note that there exists an instance of Bayes' theorem for each point in the domain. In practise, these instances might be parametrised by writing the specified probability densities as a function of and .
Consider a sample space generated by two random variables and . In principle, Bayes' theorem applies to the events and . However, terms become 0 at points where either variable has finite probability density. To remain useful, Bayes' theorem may be formulated in terms of the relevant densities (see Derivation). Simple form If is continuous and is discrete,
If
is discrete and
is continuous,
If both
and
are continuous,
Extended form
Diagram illustrating how an event space generated by continuous random variables X and Y is often conceptualized. A continuous event space is often conceptualized in terms of the numerator terms. It is then useful to eliminate the denominator using the law of total probability. For becomes an integral: , this
Bayes' rule
Main article: Bayes' rule Bayes' rule is Bayes' theorem in odds form.
where
So the rule says that the posterior odds are the prior odds times the Bayes factor.
Derivation
For events
Bayes' theorem may be derived from the definition of conditional probability:
Examples
Frequentist example
Tree diagram illustrating frequentist example. R, C, P and P bar are the events representing rare, common, pattern and no pattern. Percentages in parentheses are calculated. Note that three independent values are given, so it is possible to calculate the inverse tree (see figure above). An entomologist spots what might be a rare subspecies of beetle, due to the pattern on its back. In the rare subspecies, 98% have the pattern. In the common subspecies, 5% have the pattern. The rare subspecies accounts for only 0.1% of the population. How likely is the beetle to be rare? From the extended form of Bayes' theorem,
Drug testing
Tree diagram illustrating drug testing example. U, U bar, "+" and "" are the events representing user, non-user, positive result and negative result. Percentages in parentheses are calculated. Suppose a drug test is 99% sensitive and 99% specific. That is, the test will produce 99% true positive results for drug users and 99% true negative results for non-drug users. Suppose that 0.5% of people are users of the drug. If a randomly selected individual tests positive, what is the probability he or she is a user?
Despite the apparent accuracy of the test, if an individual tests positive, it is more likely that they do not use the drug than that they do. This surprising result arises because the number of non-users is very large compared to the number of users, such that the number of false positives (0.995%) outweighs the number of true positives (0.495%). To use concrete numbers, if 1000 individuals are tested, there are expected to be 995 non-users and 5 users. From the 995 non-users, false positives are expected. From the 5 users, true positives are expected. Out of 15 positive results, only 5, about 33%, are genuine.