Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
-While larqe-scale standardizedtesrs may appear to have great influence at specifictimes.. .. Without question, teachers ar!the drivars of the assessment systemsthat determine the effectivaness of schools. --astiggins, 1994, p. 438
Teacher-made tests can be important parts of the teaching and learning processif they are integrated into daily classroom teaching.
w
rc
planand wflte longeftests; paperand pencrl test items;and wrile Unambiguous recall of skills beyond facls measure p.72). 1,9 8 5 , {Stiggins writtencriteoa for performances or ntrolfactorslikeestablishing
procedures in advance. Wiggins notesthal "course scoring lanning testsof intellectual ability; as with standardized tests, to be authentic finals intended areusually to be quickly read and teacheriesigned (Wiggins, p. 1989, 123). scored" manyteacher-made teslsemphasize verbal-linguistic Inaddition, andpoorreaders areat a disadvantage no matter how intelligence, they know. Teacher-made content tests do not carry much the same as standardized tests in oublicrelations betweenthe imoortance community. and the Even though many o{ school them havethe tormatthat allowsfor easycomparisons, sameobjective-style they not seen as reliable vaiid. are and Teacher-made testsareoften because from classto class; subjectto question they differgreatly (1994) notesthat although theirqualityis opento debate.Stiggins largescaleassessments standardized, command all the mediaattention, rt's the day-toiay classroom assessments lhat havethe grea'test impact on student learning. Hesays,"Nearly allthe assessment eventsthat takeplacein a sludent'slife happen at the behestot the teacher. Theyalignmost closely with day-toiay instruction andare most intluential in terms of theircontribution to student.teacher. and (p. parent decision making" 438). Since of education colleges arejustbeginning to require teachers to lake courses in assessment. manvteachers haveenteredthe classroomwith very littletraining in how to createmeaningful tests.They eitherremember the typeso{ tests theytook as studentsor they modelthe testson onesprovided bv theirfellowteachers or in workbooks. Unfortunately, most of the teststeachers took as stu --: dentswere multiplethoice,recall tests that covered content.Teachproblem-solving ers havehadvery little practice constructing situationson teststo measure of skillsand higher-order the application thinking.
weaknesses. not only because they cifictests alsohaveglarrng designed oftentoo low leveland contentheaw. I hey are rarely
E
Teacher-made tests are often subjectto question becausethey differ greatly from class to class;their quality is open to debate.
trc
to..
I
t|/HY lilENEED DO BETTER TEACHER-MADE TESTS?
I l
@
The key to teacher-made tests is to make them a part of assessmentnot separate from it.
rc
parents published Even value though andthe media testscores. nrostteachers do not relyon slandardized teslsto tellthemwhat theirstudents knowanddon'tknow.Standardized testsoccur so infrequently thatoneaggregate is not veryhelplul in detern] score n goals. Ingfutureinstructional Teacher-made tes1s, however, allow teachers to makedecisions thatkeepinstruction moving. Teachers immediately canmakechanges to meetthe needs of theirstudents "Theylteachersl provided relymostheavily on assessments as part o{ instructional materials andassessments theydesign andconstruct verylittleon standardized themselves-and testsor testscores" (Stiggins, p. 69). 1985, Thekeyto teacher-made testsis to makethema partof assessment--floi separate from it. Testsshouldbe instructional andongo ing. Rather thanbeing'after-the-fact" to {ind out what students did nof /earn, they shouldbe more "befor+the-fact" to targetessentral ('1999) learnings Popham warnsthatteacher-made andstandards. tests shouldnot be instructional Theyshouldbe afterthoughts. prepared p/,orto instruction in orderfor the teacher to targetappro"Assessment priate instructional activities for students. instruments prepared prior a teacher's to instruction operationalize instructional youunderstand intentions. going, . . . Thebetter whereyou're the youcanget there"(p.12). moreefficiently in theirtestsfor the variTeachers alsoneedto makeadjustments problems styles, multiple intelligences, andlearning of ous learning lt wouldbe impossible the studentsin theirclasses. to address everystudent'sneedson everytest, but elforts shouldbe madeto provide teststhat motivatestudents construct to learn, and choices, for individual makeallowances ditferences.
MultiPle lntelligences
rl
lr.
rrlll
--: -
((eviewed theoryo{ multipleintelligences in Chapter Gardner's Three) callsfor multiple assessments for the multipleintelligences. An effectiveteacher-made test should address morethanone or two
ro..
98
TYPES OF LEARNERS
m nd sometrmesstrays dufing verbalactivities organizedin approach to tasks hkesto read !suallya good speller memoflzesby seerng graphicsand pictures frnds verbalinstructions difflcult
hasdifficulty with wrillen directions likesto be readto memorizes by steps in a sequence enjoys listeninq activlties
poorspeIer likes to solve problems by physically walking through them enjoys handlingobjects enjoys doing activities
intelligences. Teachers who include strategies andtoolssuchas graphic organizers, choice, and opportunities for oral student answers meetthe needs of theirdiverse students.
[earning Modalilies
Teachers needto construct tests that can be adjusted for students' learning modalities and to makemodifications for at-riskstudents. (1990) Frender learning modalities defines as waysof using sensory in{ormation primarily learn. Three five to of the sensesare usedin -learning, storing, andrecalling informationBecause learn students from andcommunicate best with someonewho sharestheirdominantmodality. it is important for teachers to know the characteristics of theirstudentsso that they canat leastaltertheir instructional stylesandteststo matchthe learning stylesof all the students.
Stttj8h
IE
99
Frender hasidentifled many characteristics of the threestylesof pagelrststhe learning. TheTypesof Learners Charton the previous characteristics that couldmost likelyinfluence studenttest takrnq skrils.
E
Authentic tests can celebrat ! diversity by allowing students a wide variety o{ ways to demonstrate what they know and what they can do.
rrc
t00
9. Use visualdemonstTalrons coloredpaperis sometimes dis 10. Use whlte paperbecause tracting. 1I Do not crowd or .lLl-pr llte IFS 1 2 . G l v ec h o i c e s . to abstract 13. Go from concrele lor Don't deduct spelIng or grammar on tests. 14. tests 15. Use some take-horne manipulative experiences wheneverpossb e. 16. Provide '17. Allow students to use notesand textbooks duringsome
+6cic /^^6n h^^l r6.t.l
Allowstudents to writedownkeymathor science formuias (sothatstudents poor arenot penalized {or memory). visuals likegraphic organizers 1 9 . Include on tests. pointvalues Joreachgroup 20. Givespecific of questions. 21_ Listcriteria lor essav ouestions. feedback 2 2 . Provide immediate on all1ests. 2 3 . Allow studentsto correctmistakes and/or to retake tests to improve scores andunderstand whattheydidn'tunderstand on the first test. (Adapted from material distributed Jor by the Boardof Education pp.204-214) 1981, the Cityof Etobicoke,
t6.
r0l
"Students of all ageswho createsorneof theirown examinations are forcedto reflecton what theVhavestudiedand makejudgment: , 989, p. 115). a b o u t i t "( B r o w n 1
ISE
beginnjng the unrt. 1 . Create the tesl betore obiectives to course or 2 . Makesurethe test is correlated andbenchmarks. learning standards of thetest. 3 . Giveclear directions for eachsection questions {rom simpleto complex. 4_ Arrange the 5 . Givepointvaluesfor eachsection(e.9.,true/false {2 points eachl) fill-in-the blank, multiple 6. Vary types(true/false, the question questions per type. Limilto ten matching). choice, essay, 7. Groupquestion typestogether. (Le8ve to spacebetweenqueslrons B. Typeor printclearly. facilitate andwriting.) easyreading level is used. reading 9. Makesureappropriate '10. Include andkinesthetic tasks. oral, a variety of visual, 'l1. Makeallowances with special needs. for students (e.9., in the queslions theyselect 12. Givestudents somechoice questions). graphic of organizers or essay a choice intellect 13. Varylevelso{ questions by usingthe three-story ques processing, gathering, andapplication verbsto cover trons. '14. Provide a grading scaleso studentsknowwhat scoreconsttgrade(e.9..93-100= A; 85-92 = B: 75-44 = tutes a certain C; lv14 = D; Below70 = NotYetl). 10finish.(Theteacher 15. Givesufficient time for all students to oneshouldbe ableto work th(oughthe test in one-third halfthe timegiven students.l
102
103
graphrc presenta, Essays, organrzers. oral[)erlormances. andartistic meaningiul learning lronsn]easure andcanallbe included on of time constraints, however, teactrer-made tesls.Because many teachers choose to useobjective stylequestions Objective style questions predetermined havehighly specific, answers thatrequire a shortresponse questions include Obleclive-style the loliowing: 1. 2. 3. 4. multiple choice true-false matching shortresponse
@
. . . obrective stylequestions
canplay a role in the assessment process.. . .
rc
questions Eventhoughobjective-style canplaya rolein the assessmentprocess, they,likestandardized tests,mustbe put in the proper perspective. "Evaluation should experience for boththe student be a learning and the teacher. However. ob,ective-style testingis frequently ineffective
r04
experience for eitherthe studentor the teacher as a learning questtons obtective-style too often require only the recall of tlecause processes thinking or factsand do not allowthe studentto drsplay to observe for the City of them" (Board of Education the teacher 1987,p. 156). Etobicoke. program does not haveto include objective style A good evaluation questions if ir does,the shouldbe well constructed tests;however, by other!ulhentic styletests shouldbe balanced andthe objective asSesSmenls.
E
. . . obiective style tests shouldbe balanced by other authentic assessments.
t{rE
Test Torlure
-,- !-
ffi"i***r
'Professoa.what is this rclic?" 'lt's a Nimitive bnurc devico used by toacheEin the 20th century. They czlled it a Scaatrcnn.]dchine.'
I!.-
t05
@
A good teacher-made test includes verbsfrom all three stories ol ihe intellect.
rc
answeror a limitedset of acceptab it leadsto the "objece answers, tive evaluatron ot responses as beingrightor wrong. However, (1994) Stigglns warnsthat when the teacher selects the test rtems judgment for inclusion in the finaltest, he/sheis making a subjective as to the meaningand importance o1the material to be lested." . . judgnrent all assessments, regardless of theirformat,involve on the part o{ the assessor. reflectthe brases Therefore, all assessments of (p. 103). that assessor" Teachers shouldexamine both the advantages and disadvantages of obiective-stvle tests and then determine the rolethey will playin the process. evalualron
t06
THREE-STO INTELLECT
AFpiyA Principle $fihen Estimale Forecasl
crrren
Thereareone story rntellects. two-Story intellects. andthreestoryintellects with skylights. Allfactcollectorswho haveno aim beyond theirfactsare one storymen.Two storymencompare, generalrze, reason, usingthe labors of tact collectors aswellas theirown.Three-story menrdealize, imagine, predict-their best illumination comes from above, through the skylight.
-Qliver Wendell Holmes
\N'rl'
---.o4r,
107
MATCHINO QUESTIONS
S O C I AS LT U D I E TS EST O NS O I ] T B E A S T E R N U NT E D SIAIES pornrs Or !.r,o.: rlhr !! eacnIf I nrhe telettton Coturna A rfal rhephrase i. Co/umn / s descrbr.g
subpo n15 I nt r e s m a e r . i c l e s 1 l F o . t p e r c , c t ! )
ilr a2
d3
ChanQnA crors lromoneyear Separared coiton seeds irom Someonewho visils a place rorpeasrre
A A C D ! F
E5 !6 a3
Blggesl iarms nsoutheast Ftrsr !shc.op C'oDsQrownto !a.n money Jobs 'n wh'ch p !de aresefred
Conon Toba..o Crop Roraron S.tu'ce Jobs Planiarians !.osion G Conof G'h H StaveLabor I C.shcdps J Ra^cher r Tdlnsr
ENGLISH D(eclions: Please crcle @e n !xtto th !numb !r il the is in.ny way nalemenris tu6: cncb tu/sei{ lhe statem !nt lase (2 pornts !ch). Youwillreceive an addiliona 2 porn$il you rew.itethe falsestalements lo makelhemtuo Ot 1 Matklwain wrcte Hucktebety Fi.^
TRUE/FALSE QUESTIONS
ESSAY QUESTIONS
SCIENC!
Dneclions: Seled one oi th! lollowhg topi6 tor your essy question.Youressaywillb ! evalualed on the tolowng a60.acy of intormaion o.gEnianonol inio.mal on us! ot supporl sbtemenb clarity and 6flecriwress
r dO Rew'rle
o F
2 rom sawys 6 rhe proboonBr 'n Hucxe@try rnn. ro- sar"ygl?pp94!r! !c! tn4. blt tv.r r.nn 6 rh !plllgonar
3 Mdrl Twin s realndme '5 Srmu6l Crer !n5
r or@
I -t !.,
Pr!di(t what wilr tuoo!n rl rhe ozonetav!. @nrnues lo deolE(Eir .ts curcnr rgre 2. Ewllate the efie.rt!.!f.l oaour l$v!mmenfs r!s!arch and r!glhnoni .!larding &ij 6in. 3. Sp !cuhte wt !t will h.pp !n !treidAIDSis rcl {@nd wnhan tire v!ars 4. Cmparo .nd @nt6sr th!bubonicphque to AlDs. You may drawa Vennda4Gm io helpy@ yo!. lhor!hts b6for6you wite. o.gBnize
r08
I wrote my test beforeI taughtthe subject matter. I havelistedmy standards andbenchmarks on the test. | havelistedmy grading scaleon the test. | havevaried the question typesto include _ i haveprovided pointvalues for eachsection. I haveincluded tasksto address the multiple intellioences andlearning modalities of my students. | havegivenstudents somechoice of questions. | haveusedallthreelevels of the Three-Story Intellect verbsin my questions. | havemadeallowances for students with special needs.
IESt.
types.
7.8._ 9.10 . -
Signature:
Date:
r09
Number of third-story questions. applying Compare andcontrast the analysis of youroriginal teacher-made test to vour analysis prepared ot thecommerctalty test.Comment on yourlindings.
Construct an original teacher-made test to use with yoursludglts. Followthe guidelines.discussed in this chapter anduse "The BigTenTeachgr-Made Test Checklist-"
O 1999Styl-iSht Triiilg
rr0
.bd PubliCi.! tn -
TEACHER-MADE TESTS
RfcoR0
REFLECTION PAOE
List three thingsyouhavelearned aboutteacher-made tests. 1.
2.
..d Plbli$its
lr..
fll