Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
2. Mixture of stones, sand and cement (concrete) 3. Bamboo reapers and lake bed clay
8) Potential for corrosion is significantly reduced. 9) Minimize part count. 10) Good electric insulation. 11) Low sound transmission. 12) Low thermal conductivity and low thermal coefficient of thermal expansion. 13) Radar transparency. 14) Non-magnetic.
Industry
Successful application
Transportation
Passenger car, highway tractors, truck body, trailers, recreation vehicles, floor for rail cars, etc.
Aircraft industry
Fuselage, wing, rotor blades, cargo pods, engine cowls, boosters, satellites, helicopters, high strength turbine blades.
Marine
House roofs, modern structures, and tanks. Piping, ducts, hood stacks and storage tank. Tanks, air condition frames, condenser fans, valves, chasses, containers and other components. Electrical contacts, electrodes, low expansion pcb in lamps. Tennis racquets, golf club shafts, fishing rods, snow skis water skis, hokey sticks and arrows.
Medicine
Apart from these specific applications, the use of fiber reinforced plastics (FRP) composite material is also being explored in automobile industry, sports industry, windmills etc. most of the demand of modern society, which normally require material having high strength and stiffness at reduced weights and cost are being satisfied by composite materials.
Sl.No 1
Principal components Rudder, outboard spoiler, vertical fin, cabin vertical support rods, main landing gear fairing. Horizontal stabilizer. Outboard aileron engine inlet and outlet cowl, floor panels. Fin equipped with radar, front landing door, and access and inspection doors. Rudder, vertical fin, wings.
2 3 4
light combat aircraft (LCA) India NALS light aircraft HANSA (India) NALS 14 seated light aircraft SARAS (India)
Complete airframe structure (gfrp-foam sandwich). Composites of flight control systems of rudder, elevator, flifs, etc.
CHAPTER -2
Figure 4: Plain weaves The plain weave is the oldest and most common textile weaves. One warp end is repeatedly woven over one fill yarn and under the next. Plain weave being the most inter laced is the firmest. The most stable construction providing porosity and minimum slippage. The strength is uniform in both directions and is most resistant to in plane shear movement. Though very stable, plain weave are relatively in efficient and have poor drag i.e., they do not conform easily to surface to double curvatures.
Figure 5: Twill weaves Twill weaves are one or more warp ends passing over and fewer than two, three or more fill pieces in regular pattern. These fabrics have characteristics diagonal patterns known as twill lines. Twill weaves are relatively stable and structurally efficient than plain weaves and have relatively good drape.
Figure 6: Stain weaves Performance of natural @ synthetic fibers reinforced epoxy composites Page No 11
The stain weave represents a family of constructions with a minimum of inter lacing. In these the weft yarns are periodically skip or float over several warp yarns. Stain weaves can be produced as standard of 4.5 or 8 harness forms. The stain weave is more reliable than the plain weave as the floating yarns that are not woven in fabric creating a considerable suppleness and looseness. It conforms readily to compound curves can be woven into a very high density. This is because the weave produces a construction with low resistant shear distortion. This is one reason why stain weaves are preferred for many aerospace applications. But as the number of harness increases, so the float lengths and degree of looseness and sleaziness making the fabric more difficult to control during handling operations.
Figure 7: Leno weaves To have an advantage over the very light fabrics that tend to sleazy the leno weave fabrics are introduced .in this type of construction, two or more wrap yarns cross over each other, locking fill place .the leno weaves help to prevent the un reviling during handling operations but is unsteadily for obtaining good laminate physical properties.
Figure 8: Tri axial weaves A few fabrics with non-orthogonal fiber orientation have been developed. One of them is tri axial weave is called do weave .so the pattern consists of weave of weave in
a fashion with a straight yarn in between them. The major disadvantages of these constructions are that does not have stableness and tear resisting.
2.4.1 Properties
1) Superior tensile strength. 2) Perfect elasticity. 3) Attractive thermal properties. 4) Excellent moisture resistance. 5) Outstanding dimensional stability. 6) Excellent corrosion resistance. 7) Excellent electrical characteristics. 8) Low cost.
2.5.2 A-glass
It consists of soda-lime high alkali contents susceptible to moisture. it has limited use
2.5.3 C-glass
This has better corrosion resistance to acids than e-glass.
2.5.4 S-glass
It has higher tensile strength and modulus of elasticity than e-glass. It has got superior strength, retention at elevated temperature and high fatigue limit (high cost).
2.5.5 D-glass
Low dielectric constant and is suited for high performance electronic applications.
2.6.1 Advantages
1) Low specific weight, which results in a higher specific strength and stiffness than glass. This is a benefit especially in parts designed for bending stiffness. 2) It is a renewable resource, the production requires little energy, and co2 is given back to the environment. 3) Producible with low investment at low cost, which makes the material an interesting product for low-wage countries. 4) Friendly processing, no wear of tooling. Better working conditions, no skin irritation. 5) Thermal recycling is possible, where glass causes problems in combustion furnaces. 6) Good thermal and acoustic insulating properties.
2.6.2 Disadvantages
1) Lower strength properties, particularly its impact strength. 2) Variable quality, depending on unpredictable influences such as weather. 3) Moisture absorption, which causes swelling of the fibers. 4) Limited maximum processing temperature. 5) Lower durability, fiber treatments can improve this considerably. 6) Poor fire resistance. 7) Price can fluctuate by harvest results or agricultural politics. 8) Irregular fiber lengths; spinning is required to obtain continuous yarns.
respectively). Apart from much lower cost and renewable nature of jute, much lower energy requirement for the production of jute (only 2 per cent of that for glass) makes it attractive as a reinforcing fiber in composites. The jute composites may be used in everyday applications such as lampshades, suitcases, paperweights, helmets, shower and bath units. They are also used for covers of electrical applications, pipes, post boxes, roof tiles, grain storage silos, panels for partition & false ceilings, bio-gas containers, and in the construction of low cost, mobile or prefabricated buildings which can be used in times of natural calamities such as floods, cyclones, earthquakes, etc.
All this leads to (i) poor wet ability with resin and (ii) weak interfacial bonding between jute fiber and the relatively more hydrophobic matrices. Environmental
performance of such composites is generally poor due to delamination under humid conditions. In order to develop composites with better mechanical properties and environmental performance, it is necessary to impart hydrophobicity to the fibers by chemical reaction with suitable coupling agents or by coating with appropriates resins. Following means can do modification of jute and other natural cellulosic fibers; chemical means, coating with polymeric solutions and graft copolymerization. The hydroxyl groups of jute are blocked when chemically treated making the fibers more hydrophobic. Polymeric coating of jute fiber is highly effective in enhancing the reinforcing character of jute fiber, giving as high as 20-40 percent improvements in flexural strength and 40-60 percent improvements in flexural modulus. These modifications improve the fiber-matrix resin wet ability and lead to improve bonding. Jute can be graft copolymerized with vinyl monomers. Grafting of polyacrylonitrile (10-25 percent) imparts 10-30 percent improvements in flexural strength and flexural modulus of the composites.
electronic balance. The new weight is noted down. The difference in initial weight and new weight gives moisture content present in jute. The % of moisture is calculated using the relation. Moisture content =initial weight final weight/final weight Thus the moisture % by weight present in jute is determined.
CHAPTER-3
depends on the resin, the curing temperature, required working or pot life and the gel time. The most commonly catalyst is benzoyl peroxide, which is efficient, easy to handle, readily soluble in monomeric styrene storable for long periods of the time without the loss of activity and stable at room temperature. Cobalt naphtha late is used as accelerator.
Figure 9: Stress-strain curve for an ideal resin system The figure below shows the stress / strain curve for an ideal resin system. The curve for this resin shows high ultimate strength, high stiffness and a high strain to failure. This means that the resin is initially stiff but at the same time will not suffer from brittle failure. Performance of natural @ synthetic fibers reinforced epoxy composites Page No 21
It should also be noted that when a composite is loaded in tension, for the full mechanical properties of the fiber component to be achieved, the resin must be able to deform to at least the same extent as the fiber. The figure below gives the strain to failure for e-glass, s-glass, aramid and high-strength grade carbon fibers on their own. Here it can be seen that, for example, the s-glass fiber, with an elongation to break of 5.3%, will require a resin with an elongation to break of at least this value to achieve maximum tensile properties.
Figure 10: Selection criteria for the ideal resin system for a fiber
tend to create a brittle composite, which cracks easily. it is important to match this property to the elongation of the fiber reinforcement.
become liquid again if heated, although above a certain temperature their mechanical properties will change significantly. This temperature is known as the glass transition temperature (Tg), and varies widely according to the particular resin system used, its degree of cure and whether it was mixed correctly. Above the Tg, the molecular structure of the thermo set changes from that of a rigid crystalline polymer to a more flexible, amorphous polymer. This change is reversible on cooling back below the Tg. Above the Tg properties such as resin modulus drop sharply, and as a result the compressive and shear strength of the composite does too. Other properties such as water resistance and color stability also reduce markedly above the resins Tg. Although there are many different types of resin in use in the composite industry, the majority of structural parts are made with three main types, namely polyester, vinyl ester and epoxy.
Figure 11: Idealized chemical structure of a simple epoxy (ethylene oxide) Usually identifiable by their characteristic amber or brown coloring, epoxy resins have a number of useful properties. Both the liquid resin and the curing agents form low viscosity easily processed systems. Epoxy resins are easily and quickly cured at any temperature from 5c to 150c, depending on the choice of curing agent. One of the most advantageous properties of epoxies is their low shrinkage during cure, which minimizes fabric print-through, and internal stresses. High adhesive strength and high mechanical properties are also enhanced by high electrical insulation and good chemical rsistance. Epoxies find uses as adhesives, caulking compounds, casting compounds, sealants, varnishes and paints, as well as laminating resins for a variety of industrial applications. Performance of natural @ synthetic fibers reinforced epoxy composites Page No 25
Epoxy resins are formed from a long chain molecular structure similar to vinyl ester with reactive sites at either end. In the epoxy resin, however, epoxy groups instead of ester groups form these reactive sites. The absence of ester groups means that the epoxy resin has particularly good water resistance. The epoxy molecule also contains two ring groups at its center which are able to absorb both mechanical and thermal stresses better than linear groups and therefore give the epoxy resin very good stiffness, toughness and heat resistant properties.
Tg (k)
65.5 70.3
4.3 1.1
366 400
CHAPTER-4
EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS
Peel ply is optional. Most often it is used to give the laminate a rough, rather than smooth, finish. Many engineers consider this a bondable finish, and it usually passes a wet out test. If peel ply is used, it will absorb a small amount of resin, and this must be accounted for. A net resin prepared may end up too dry. Peel ply specs should say how much resin would be absorbed, in ounces per squire foot, or grams per squire meter.
4.3.4 Bag
The bag is the last item to be placed. Its a relatively thick plastic layer, available in different amount of conformability. The bag is usually applied along one edge at a time. Start at one corner and press the bag in to the other corner, removing the release paper from the tape. As you move along the edge. Be careful not to get any wrinkles in the bag or it will leak. Plates will be required for anything but flat or simply curved structures. Make sure you remember to attach the vacuum port (not shown in the figure) before closing the bag. The base of the port goes inside the bag; cut a small cross in the bag for the attachment flange to fit through. If the tool has an area for the port, make sure there is a breather path from the port to the part. If the port goes on the part itself, put several layers of breather under the port to prevent print through.
CHAPTER-5
5.3.1 Sampling
Test at least 5 specimens per test conditions unless valid results can be gained through the use of fewer specimens, such as in the case of a design experiment.
5.3.2 Labeling
Label the coupons so that they will be distinct from each other and traceable back to the raw material and in a manner that will both be unaffected by the test and not influence the test.
5.5 Standard test methods for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite material ASTM D 3039/D 3039-00 5.5.1 Scope
This test method determines the in-plane tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials reinforced by high modulus fibers. The composite material forms are limited to continuous fiber or discontinuous-fiber reinforced composites in which the laminate is balanced and symmetric in respect to the test direction.
5.5.4 Calculations
The tensile strength of the laminate can be calculated by using the relation, f=p/bd Where f=Tensile strength in N/mm2 p= Max. load in N b=Breadth of the tensile specimen in mm d=Thickness of the tensile specimen in mm
Overall Fiber Orientation 0 Unidirectional 90 Unidirectional Balanced and Symmetric Random Discontinuous 25 250 2.5 25 250 2.5 25 175 2.0 Width mm 15 Length mm 250 Thickness mm 1.0
Tab Length mm 56
25
1.5
90
-----
-----
-----
-----
Type of test
ASTM designation
Length * width
250 * 25.0 mm 120 * 12.5 mm 127 *1 2.7 mm 130 * 25.0 mm 020 * 10.0 mm
5.6 Standard test method for compressive properties of polymer matrix composite material ASTM D 3410/D 3410M 5.6.1 Scope
This test method determines the in-plane compressive properties of polymer matrix composite materials reinforced by high modulus fibers. The composite materials are limited to continuous fiber or discontinuous fiber re enforced composites in which the laminate is balanced.
5.6.4 Geometry
Fiber Orientation Width mm Gauge Length mm 0 Unidirectional 90 Unidirectional Specially Orthotropic 25 10-25 65 140-155 1.5 25 10-25 65 140-155 1.5 10 10-25 65 140-155 1.5 Tab Length mm Overall Length mm Tab Thickness mm
Table 6: Compression specimen geometry recommendations Design of mechanical test coupons, especially those using end tabs remains to a large extent. Each major composite testing laboratory has developed gripping methods for the specific material systems and environments commonly encountered with in that
laboratory. The compression tensile specimen geometry recommendations are shown in the following table.
5.6.5 Calculations
The compressive strength of the laminate can be calculated by using the relation f=p/bd Where f=Compressive strength in N/mm2 p= Max. load in N b=Breadth of the tensile specimen in mm d=Thickness of the tensile specimen in mm
5.7 Standard test method for flexural properties of polymer matrix composite material ASTM D 790-98 5.7.1 Scope
These methods cover the determination of flexural properties of plastics and insulating materials. They may be in the form of rectangular bars moulded directly or cut from sheets, plates, or moulded shapes. These methods are applicable to rigid and semirigid materials. However, that does not fail in the outer fibers.
Flexural properties determined are especially useful for quality control and specification purposes. a three-point loading technique is adopted which is depicted in the diagram. At the point of loading, the top surface of the specimen will be in a state of compression, whereas the bottom surface will be in tension. Stress is computed from specimen thickness. The maximum tensile stress exists at the bottom surface of the specimen directly below the point of application of the load. The stress at fracture using this flexure test is known as flexure strength.
Flexural properties
11 The flexural strength of the composites was measured by using their print-binding test according to ASTM (American standard test methods) D790. The hybrid composites specimens of size 100*12.5 mm are tested using support span of 81.8mm at a crosshead of 2 mm/min.
5.7.3 Calculations
The flexural strength S of the specimen is given by the formula S=3pl/2bd2 Where S=Stress in the outer fires at midspan in N/mm2 p=Load at a given point on the load-displacement curve in N l=Support span in mm b=Width of the beam tested in mm. d=Depth of the specimen in mm.
5.8 Standard test method for inter laminar shear properties of polymer matrix composite material ASTM D 2344 5.8.1 Scope
This test has been used for determining interlaminar shear strength of bidirectional laminate specimens. It is believed applicable for any constant temperature at which the constituent materials are structurally stable. Creep effects are neglected. Polymeric composites with a laminated and fibrous structure have typical shortcoming in their low shear resistance, especially in the planes where the properties of the materials are determined by the matrix (resin). Hence shear strength gives the properties of resin used. The ILSS is used to determine the adhesive force at the matrix reinforcement interface and tangential stresses acting at that interface therefore in the experimental determination of ILSS, it is important to know the actual magnitude of tangential stresses which can lead to the failure of the specimen. Because of its simplicity, it is used as a quality control tool. It involves a three-point flexure specimen with the span to depth ratio l/h, chosen to produce interlaminar shear failure. A complexity is presented by the short beam shear method when used for laminated materials. In particular, the ILSS will be parabolic within each layer, but a discontinuity in slope will occur at the ply interfaces, as a result the maximum shear stresses will not necessarily occur at the center. Laminated beam theory is hence required to calculate the stresses. Thus, the short beam method is applicable only to polymeric and composite materials, which can be treated as homogenous. Practical experience showed that interlaminar shear failures are difficult to attain at higher span to depth ratios. A specimen width maximum thickness of 6.4 mm is required by ASTM standards. There is no such minimum thickness specified, hence specimens as thin as 2.9 mm have been used.
5.8.3 Procedure
According to ASTM standards D-2344-76 the thickness and width of the specimen is measured (to nearest 0.025) at the midpoint and the overall length of the specimen is 20mm and width is 10mm. The test specimen is placed in the test fixture and aligned so that its midpoint is centered and long axis is perpendicular to the cylindrical axis or under the loading nose push the side support into the span previously determined. (10mm). Apply the load to the specimen at a crosshead rate of 2mm/min.the load to fracture the specimen (maximum load, displacement on the indicating mechanism) is recoded.
5.8.4 Calculations
The inter laminar shear strength S is calculated by using the formula, S= (3/4) (w/ab) S=Inter laminar shear strength in kg/mm2 w=Breaking load in kg a=Width of the specimen in mm b= Thickness of specimen in mm
FLEXURAL TEST
TENSILE TEST
COMPRESSION TEST
CHAPTER-6
Process: Hand lay-up and Vacuum bagging at room temperature. Number of layers: 6 layers of jute fibers.
Weight of the jute fiber ply No. of jute fibers Total weight of the jute fiber ply
For 0.55 weight fraction of jute The weight of the laminate = 264 gms
=100:12
6.3 Fabrication details of GJRP 6.3.1 Specifications of glass jute reinforced plastics
Material Reinforcement: Glass cloth E-grade (uni-directional), Jute fiber of 1 feet* 1 feet Matrix: Resin LY 556 and Hardener HY 951
Process: Hand lay-up and Vacuum bagging at room temperature. Number of layers: 5 layers of Glass cloth and 4 layers of Jute cloth. Mill used: 8 mill
layout
laminate setup
laminate
10
15
20
25
10
15
20
25
10
15
20
25
10
15
20
25
-0.02 -0.03 -0.04 -0.05 -0.06 -0.07 Displacement (mm) Load Vs Displacement
10
15
20
25
-0.02 -0.03 -0.04 -0.05 -0.06 -0.07 -0.08 Displacement (mm) Load Vs Displacement
10
15
20
25
-0.02 -0.03 -0.04 -0.05 -0.06 -0.07 Displacement (mm) Load Vs Displacement
Load Vs Displacement
4 3 2 1 0 -1 -1 0 1 2 3 4 Displacement (mm)
Load Vs Displacement
Load Vs Displacement
4 3 2 1 0 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Displacement (mm)
Load Vs Displacement
6 4 2 0 -2 0 1 2 3 Displacement (mm) 4 5 6
Load Vs Displacement
6 4 2 0 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10
Displacement (mm)
Load Vs Displacement
6 4 2 0 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Displacement (mm)
Load vs Displacement
Load (Kgf)
0.5
1.5
2.5
3.5
Displacement (mm)
Load vs Displacement
Specimen No
Width (mm)
Thickness (mm)
Direction
12.5
2.9
Warp
12.5
2.9
0.40
Warp
0.047
81.54
12.5
2.9
0.40
Warp
0.051
88.48
Maxim Specimen Width Thickness Weight Weight Direction Load (mm) (mm) fraction fraction carried um No of jute of glass (KN) strength (wf) (wf) (MPa) 4 12.5 2.9 0.40 0.15 Warp 0.062 107.57
12.5
2.9
0.40
0.15
Warp
0.065
112.75
12.5
2.9
0.40
0.15
Warp
0.061
105.83
Specimen No
Width (mm)
Thickness (mm)
Direction
25.0
2.9
Warp
25.0
2.9
0.55
Warp
6.5
89.6
25.0
2.9
0.55
Warp
5.75
79.3
Specimen Width Thickness Weight Weight Direction Load (mm) (mm) fraction fraction carried No of jute of jute (KN) (wf) (wf) 4 25.0 2.9 0.40 0.15 Warp 9.9
25.0
2.9
0.40
0.15
Warp
10.3
142.06
25.0
2.9
0.40
0.15
Warp
9.95
137.3
Specimen No
Width (mm)
Thickness (mm)
Direction
10
2.9
Warp
10
2.9
0.40
Warp
82.02
20.8
Maxim Specimen Width Thickness Weight Weight Direction Load (mm) (mm) fraction fraction carried um No of jute of glass (KN) strength (wf) (wf) (MPa) 3 10 2.9 0.40 0.15 Warp 94.12 23.84
10
2.9
0.40
0.15
Warp
86.08
21.18
CHAPTER-7
a lower weight fraction side and the reinforcement fiber is on a higher weight fraction side, the tensile strength recorded was 83.8 MPa. The failure occurred at mid span indicating the correctness of the test specimen geometry. The failure occurred due to the fiber fracture. The load displacement graph indicates that mode of fracture is brittle in nature.
With the increase in fiber weight fraction (i.e. more than .55wf), there will be increase in strength by some percentage over the previous weight fraction .since the jute is a natural fiber ,therefore the resin absorption is high and the weight fraction of jute fibers could not be used more than .55wf as the layers could not be wetted properly.
This implies that the tensile strength was increased by 39.4 %. This is so called hybrid effect. Visual inspection of failed specimens showed that the glass fibers were not fully fractured implying that the specimen has failed due to matrix shortage. If at all the hybridization could have been carried out at lesser weight fraction of the reinforcement, it would have resulted in better load transfer by matrix to reinforcement resulting in better strength of the hybrid composite.
This test is carried out mainly to test the bonding forces that exist between the reinforcement and the matrix. This showed that at 40% weight of jute fiber, the strength obtained was 21.4 MPa .this test basically defined matrix properties.
8. Conclusions
From the results obtained, it can be concluded that tensile strength increases as fiber weight fraction increases.
By introducing just 15 % by weight glass fibers into the jute composite, a 40 %increase in tensile strength was achieved. By introducing just 15 % by weight glass fibers into the jute composite, a 23 %increase in flexural strength was achieved. Flexural strength marginally increased on hybridization
Interlaminar shear strength being a matrix dominated property it did not shows any significant changes when subjected to hybridization.Incase of requirements of enhanced strength and performance from the jute composites, a phenomenal 40 % increase in tensile strength would be achieved by going in for hybridization
Applications
By using less number of glass layers along with jute a non structural components can be made. Performance of natural @ synthetic fibers reinforced epoxy composites Page No 85
Floor boards Partition boards Any commercial packing materials Battery trolleys and trolley floors.
CHAPTER-8
REFERENCES/ BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. SELECTION OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND ADHESIVES Lawrence W.Fisher, P.E.Taylor Francis Publishers 2. PROCEEDING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR COMPOSITES F.A.Breton, W.G.Knauss Tehomic Publishers 3. COMPOSITE BASICS Andrew C Marshall Marshall consulting 4. COMPOSITE MATERIALS Performance of natural @ synthetic fibers reinforced epoxy composites Page No 86
S.C.Sharma Narosa publishing house 5. THE JOURNAL OF THE HYBRID EFFECT DOES IT EXIST? L.N.Philips 6. THE JOURNAL OF A REVIEW OF THE TENSILE, COMPRESSIVE, FLEXURAL AND SHEAR PROPERTIES OF HYBRID FIBER-REINFORCED PLASTICS G.Kretsis (Imperial college of science and technology, UK) 7. THE JOURNAL OF HYBRID LAMINATES OF GLASS/CARBON FIBERS-1 Donald R. Loell, Dlc, Ceng, Ficheme
8. THE JOURNAL OF HYBRID LAMINATES OF GLASS/CARBON FIBERS-2 Donald R. Loell, Dlc, Ceng, Ficheme
9. THE JOURNAL OF HYBRIDS-A REVIEW PART 1. TECHNIQUES, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION D.Short and J.Summerscales
10. THE JOURNAL OF HYBRIDS-A REVIEW PART 2. PHYSICAL PROPERTIES D.Short and J.Summerscales
R.Mohan kishore Department of metallurgy, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore 560012, India M.K.Shridar, R.M.V.G.K.Rao Material science division, National Aerospace Laboratories, Bangalore, 560017, India
12. THE JOURNAL OF INTERLAMINAR STRESS CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF LAMINATED COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
18. www.goole.com