Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Dr. N. Wasiuddin
Braden Smith Jared Taylor John Harrison Sarah Wells Samantha Tatro Ryan Ross
Instructor
Project Manager Transportation Group Geotechnical Group Water Group Structural Group Estimating and Planning Group
Project Overview Timeline Current State Transportation Geotechnical Water Structural Estimating and Planning Questions
September, 2012 May, 2013 Add Exit 83 at Tarbutton Road Construct a Wider Tarbutton Road Bridge
Relativeness:
Waggoner Engineering Copies Provided from DOTD Plans Copies Provided from DOTD Plans
September Teams Formed and Project Defined October Researching Manuals and Software November Learning Software Packages December Calculations and Modifying Procedures January Design/Calculations February Design/Calculations
Water
Structures
Transportation
Objectives
Improve I-20 Access Alignment for Tarbutton Interchange Pavement Design Traffic Design Minimize Project Cost
Misc. Businesses Ruston Jr. High
Geometric Design
Followed AASHTO: Geometric Design of Highways and Streets
AutoCad Civil3D Main Software Horizontal Alignment Vertical Alignment Pavement Cross-Sections Intersections Lane Widening
AutoCad Civil3D
Received *.dwg file from Waggoner
Vertical Alignment
Tarbutton Road
Cut/Fill
Calculated from the corridor to the existing surface
Pavement Analysis
Mechanistic approach
Fatigue Cracking
18 Kip ESAL
Rutting
Pavement Analysis
Kenpave Evaluates Durability and Life Expectancy Based on Load Repetitions Repetitions Cause Pavement Failure Rutting and Fatigue Cracking
Tasks
Field Sampling Initially brown clayey soil. Transitioned into reddish sandy clay material around 3 ft depth.
Soil Tests Moisture Content Sieve Analysis Specific Gravity Plastic Limit Liquid Limit
Soil Testing Results correlated with information provided in boring logs. Provided hands on experience with collecting data and performing tests.
Soil Profile
Piles are being placed in very dense gray clayey sand layer.
Pile Grouping 3 or 4 Columns 16 (18 piles) Spacings 4.5ft center to center. Group dimensions are B= 10.5ft and Z= 37.5ft
Objectives
Calculate Runoff Ditch Analysis Existing Culvert Analysis
CATCHMENT 3 AREA = 28.627 ACRE GRADE: 2% HYDRAULIC LENGTH: 2410FT CATCHMENT 2 AREA = 11.485 ACRE GRADE: 1% HYDRAULIC LENGTH: 1733FT
Introduction
Existing Conditions
Catchment Areas
Analysis
Conclusion
Introduction
Existing Conditions
Catchment Areas
Analysis
Conclusion
Interstates Roadway Grade, Bridges, Cross Drains, or Side Drains under important side roads Side Drains under private drives & average conditions Median Drains Storm Drains and Inlets Roadside Channel Detour Road Structures
Introduction
Existing Conditions
Catchment Areas
Analysis
Conclusion
Rational Method Catchment Areas Rainfall Region Runoff Coefficient Time of Concentration Intensity Final Peak Runoff Data
Q= CiA
Q= peak runoff rate (ft^3/sec) C= runoff coefficient i= average rainfall intensity at time of concentration A= drainage area
Introduction
Existing Conditions
Catchment Areas
Analysis
Conclusion
Runoff Coefficient
Hydraulics Manual Industrial Light Areas
Lincoln Parish
C = 0.50
Introduction
Existing Conditions
Catchment Areas
Analysis
Conclusion
Results of Runoff
Hydraulic Catchment Area (acre) Length (ft) 1 2 3 4 11.6 11.5 28.6 15.4 1733 1733 2410 1687 Slope Time of Concentration (hr) 1.04 1.19 1.18 0.89 Intensity (in/hr) 0.234 0.215 0.216 0.255 Peak Runoff (ft3/sec) 1.363 1.243 3.114 1.986
2% 1% 2% 4%
Drainage
Side Ditch Cross Drain Culvert
Depth Critical Depth New Slope New Depth (ft) (ft) (%) (ft) 0.179 0.285 0.112 0.439
0.17 0.304 0.242 0.269 0.4517 0.352 0.112 0.37 0.25 0.42 0.494 0.434
Design Approach
Manual Calculations using Excel Spreadsheets
QConBridge
Check maximum moment and shear Manual calculations varied by less than 1%
STAAD Pro
Finite element analysis and design software Creates 3D model of bridge
Project Overview
Bridge length: 300 ft. 4 lanes
Side View
Span 1: 50 ft. Span 2: 80 ft. Span 3: 80 ft. Span 4: 90 ft.
Girder Selection:
Maximum Span Length: 100 ft
AASHTO
Bridge Cross-Section
Girder spacing: 8ft. Overhang spacing: 3ft. - 11in Lane width: 12ft. Shoulder width: 10 ft.- 8 in
Slab Design
Maximum Design Span: 6.667 ft
Slab Reinforcement
F- Shape (PL-2)
Resources
Calculating Estimate
Unit Price * Quantity = Total Cost per Bid Item
(7200 sy)*($38.43/sy) = $276,696.00
Earthwork Tarbutton Road Interchange Ramps Drainage Bridge (Partial Estimate) Traffic Engineering Roadside Development
Estimated Cost 3,001,674.15 797,136.00 1,217,707.00 142,268.63 950,459.62 80,204.68 33,653.37 $ 6,223,103.45
Earthwork
Roadway excavation Embankment Borrow
$3,001,674.15
Asphalt Pavement
Superpave asphaltic concrete Class II Base Course (varying thicknesses)
$2,014,843.00
Drainage
Storm drain pipe (18 RCP) Class A concrete Trenching
$142,268.63
Bridge Construction
Class A & AA concrete Precast concrete test piles Reinforcing steel Expansion joint seal
$950,459.62
Traffic Engineering
Traffic signals Signage Pavement markings
$80,204.68
Roadside Development
Topsoil Seeding
$33,653.37
Questions