Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
s
hal'e appeared in Pakistan and
other coun/lies on the historical
Xle ,ground 01 /II pa,Jj/ion ana
formal/on 01 the Pakistan Stale as
well as po/ilico/, social and ceo
IlOfl.ie developments in the
COlI Iry sine 1941. But little has
b "n PI bUsh :J on philosophical
iJC! ify n I'lkislan 0\' r thai
. - ,
Th e)f, c .,0),
nl) Ite ant( /o1lcal and
ca' v W.5 1)1 0(1i/. :In'- ph/a
10 /;: Ol:l :ie-crib.s 'h .10in
lCIId.r of elhJ .'.JJ thought 'n tile
co. II ry T c tWO IQJ/ essuys deal
w Ih .he concepts 01 Islamic
:11:710 t( Y and
.. lJ)Ok t'J rans/alian 01
.. ,961 Russian edition
I
L < c It A ( '" lJ E '\[ Y OF SC[ENCES
I
r I
r ) II' f l(.IPH\
\\ 1 Slcpanyanls
PAKISTAN:
and SocioloO"\'
".
(Essays)
"NAUKA" PUBLISHING HOUSE
CENTRAL DEPARTMENT OF ORIENTAL LITERATURE
MOSCOW 1911
A numb
have app(
olher COUI
backgroun,
formation (
weJI as po
nomic d(
country sir
been publi.
ac:/;vity In
period.
Thh coU
nlo the on
glcaJ \ iew.
an
'rends 01 CI
country. Th
wdh lhe
Translated from the Russi an
by R. KOSTYUK
CON TENTS
Introduction by L. R. Polonskaya
Author's Preface
I. Problems of Ontology and Gnosiology on Pakistan Philosophy
II. Ethical Ideas
Ill. Pakistan's Path of Development: The Search [or a Theoretical
Foundation
IV. The Ideological Controversy on the State Structure of Pakistan
Appendices
Philosophical and Sociological Centres of Pakistan
Soviet Philosophers on the Pakistan Philosophical Congress
Sessions
Third Session
Fourth Session
Eighth Session
Fifteenth Session
Bibliography
Name Index
Page
5
II
.8
43
65
8.
96
99
99
109
115
117
119
I.
A numb
h we o p p ~
all c cou,
bacligro JIl
formalfon,
well 03 po
nlml dl
lln/'/s"
b =- "ubJi
/j\' Iy r
,
Toll
.,/0 the on
ell '" cw
XJph - I-
re"'Jd.l 01 c
'OI. lry.
w!h
INTRODUCTION
The main trend of social thought in the countries of Asia during
the colonial period was represented by the ideology or the national-
liberation movement. Different social strata and classes united in support
of the anti-imperialist slogans of that movement. Their single-hearted
goal was independence, although of course they understood that goal
differently, and by no means all could be credited with even an ap-
proximate idea of the nature of the future state; nor did their concep-
tion of the ways and means of achieving that goal coincide Grave con
tradictions divided the bourgeoiS and feudal nationalists, who led the
movement, and the peasants, semi-proletarians, workers and middle
strata, who constituted its basis in the masses. But hatred of colonicl
domination remained the keynote of the Ideology of !!Ill the !!Ibove-
mentioned social groups.
With the achievement of political independence, the closs ond social
differentiation of the forces contributory to the liberation struggle was
accentuated. Still there remained to them common interests growing out
of the developing countries' backward position in the world economic
system and the urgent task of overcoming their dire legacy and gainin'i!"
economic independence.
So on the whole these forces maintained their anU-imperialist posi-
tions and continued to oppose all forms of colonialism. Above all they
wanted to put an end to the feudal backwardness of their countries anet
, give each an industrial base of its own on which to build up its economy.
But while the bourgeois natlonelists wanted to reach that goal by the
capitalist road, the wide sections of the people were showinS! an increas-
ing o!Iwareness of the fael that the tasks involved could not be solved
under capitalist conditions. An important feature of the ideology of the
plOgressive classes of the younS! sovereign states o!It the current sto!lge
was the striving to theoretically substantiate the necessity of non-capital-
ist development. Due to the marked influence of the social psychology )
of the peasantry on liOCial thougbt, however, these anti_capitalist lentl-
ments were often translated Into notions of the feasibility of some lort
of a "third" road.
At the same time. the semi-feudal landlords and other social eroups
associated with the old mode of production and old feudal ideology rew
5
A numbel
have appea
other count
background
formation 01
well a" poll
nomic de\
countT}' sin(
en
acl:\ilr In
p ,;oi.
ThIs
trIo Ihe ont(
'1ir-aJ \
. phI f. and
tfends 01 e/l
counlry. Tile
wIlli the c
democracy a
The book
h 1967 Ru
any democratiC' rdorms. ('\"('0 of II bOIlT!!eois-demonauc
nature
It oes without sayio that th(' genl'Tal laws of the ilieol oRical
development of the youn states of the East mllnif('!lt themselves in
different wan in different countries. on the concrete condi
tions pre\"ailinlO! in each country. In Pakistan th>lr operati on mllSI lx>
viewed the prism of Muslim nationalism. 11le latt et emerged a'
lin independl'lIl trend of social Iholl!!111 at Ih> lime of the birth and
upsurge of the an-India national1iberaticm movement (end of the 19th-
firs1 quarter of the 20th centuries). It was a Iren<1 the Idea 01
anti-impe-rialist struggle wilh defence of the right s of the religious mino-
rity which forMed the Muslim community.
The political concept of Muslim nationalism renecled the desire
of the feudal upper crust of Illat community, deni ed political power by
the British colonialists, to regain its privileges.
of al\ It-at ideology suited the Muslim bourg: eoisle who (with
the exception of certain lsmaili groups) were for var iOUS ohjective rea
'Ions almost half a century hehind their Hindi counterparts. Hence
desire to win the support of the top Muslim feudal elements and so
their dehmces not only llg:ainst exploitat ion by the English
bouTeoisie but also against the competition of the economically and
politicallv Indian bourgeois groups .
Tn the P<'rts of 'Jorth India with predominanlly Muslim populations,
where tile Muslim bourgeOisie Punjab;' Si ndhij were extremely
weak and capitalist enterprise had from Ill(' \elY beginning been con-
centrated in the hands of Hindus. mostl y Gu jarati s and Marwaris, con
ditions were hi\.!hly conducive 10 the channelli ng of local nationalism
Into the mainstream of Muslim nationalism. With It merged the anti-
feudal aims of the peasanls, the artisans and the small landowners, all
united in their hdt red of the prepondera ntly Hindu middlemen and
money-lenders. Muslim nationalism also became one of the ideologies
erlopt efl by the middle-class Muslims dissahfied with the Hindu monopO-
ly the middl e and lower rungs of Indian industry, trade and the civil
servIce.
In a word. Muslim nationalism was lied IIp in colonia\ India wilh
the terntonal and economic interests of d," ,. M
. . . eren wClal strata of us-
Ilms. and so combmed qUIte diffe rent tende A . f h
. . , nCles. t the heIght 0 t e
hbE>ratlon struggle. they all rallied to the call for the crealion of a
distinct Jndian Muslim state Pakistan.
The leaders of the movement for the f .
kistan upheld the right 01 the "M ,. . ormation of thf' state of Pa-
us 1m Mhon" to SE'lf- It' . Th
idea that the Muslims 01 Tndia constitute a d I (e ermlOa\Lon. e
confusion of the concepts 01 national_\ . IS IOC\ nation renects some
Nntonal and fer. . .
It must he admitted. however , that th!' d ,. I lOus-soclal uOlty.
- I eo oglst s of M ,
<10 nol l! sually view 1]000n on 1511110 lIS 1m nationalism
( S <In t'l(CIIISively reliRiow; lie.
6
Thdt I!i. ht'Clll5e ISI,lm c",,'{, ,( whole compl .. x ot reli\!10-philo50phicat
ldeils, elhical ,11]11 mstltutlOn5, and the term Mushm na-
tIon" is used 10 deslgn,\t!' a (ommon hIstorIcal desllny, common tradItion . .;,
a common culhnc 'lntl common 80CI<I1 Inslliullons. The f,ICI that the
bourReoisie and lower mill1l1e ddll.w.S 01 the &<Ime lalth also shared milch
the &<Ime economic disadvdntdges dS iI result of the unequal capitalist
developmenl 01 colonidl India only MlclNI economIc substance to the con-
cept of the "Muslim lldhon"
Nevertheless, it was the (lssllmpllon of Ihe splritllal kinshi p of all
Muslims that was prillltHy in this concept. It is no dccident that Muham
mad Ali Jinndh, the "f,Jlher of Pdkistdn", C<.li!ed the Muslim lldllOn en
ideologica l ndti on, a nd Paklst<.ln <1 11 ideological sldte,
In the eyes of Muslims, Isl<l1O W<.lS <.I symbol 01 fomJeT independence,
and consolidati on on its l)dsis WdS made a battle cry imperialist
rule. Loyal ty to the faith of thei r fa thers was deeply rooted 111 the SOCi al
psycholoRY of the peasants In Islilm the ideologists of the Muslim bour-
geois and landlord upper crust had a ready key to the heart of the mas
ses with whose hel p they sOIl Rl1\ to prot ect their own seillsh
the e xponent s of the mIddle strata saw It itS a means of uni\i n the peo
pie in Ihe st ru.g gle agd inst impenallsm. Whatever the motive,> of the
Muslim theorists we re, their poi nt of departure was dlways the necessity
of reformin.g their religion and addpti ng it to Ihe reqUirement s of modern
bourgeois society.
The reform of Islam as an inseparable inRredient of Muslim national-
ism is cl osely linked with the name of Muhammad Iqbal. a thinker con
cerned not only 10 substantiate the political ideas and economic claims
of the Musli m communIt y of Bntlsh Ind: a bu: a lso to expl ain the roots
of the idea of Muslim Ilalionahsm dlld est ablish <l relationship between
Muslim natlOnahsm and natIOnalisti C thinking generally. Iqbal pointed
out Ihat in lmlia, where the Muslims were a m11l0rity, it only natu-
ral for them to want to un it e on the hasis 01 Islam; that deSire had been
strengthened by colonial occupation and the policy of the coloniahsts.
'Today it is being gradual1y realised . .. 111 the shape of whal is called
nationclJism," he noted in the mid-thirlies.
1
Iqbal Ihe poet and never tired 01 pointin!! out Ihat
"nationalism in Ihc sense of love of one's cOl1ntry and even readiness
to d!e for honour a !hilt of thc l\lushm,>' faith .... ?'\atlondllsm be-
comes tI problem for Muslims only In countnes where they hdPpen to
be in d minority .... In majorily Countll{'s Isldm accommodates ndtiondl-
ism; for there Islam and dTE" pracl!cally Identical. ...
I Quoted from unci Dot"luncnh an the Indurn
1921-1947, vol. II, p. 440. For the full blbhographlcal see the
list al the end of the hook.
:. 1\1. Iqbal, Islam and AiulIO"dlsm. pp. 4344.
7
A numbe
appe,
olher coun
oackgrouna
lor motion 0
well as pol
nomic de
country sin.
been pub/is
a<:1:l'ilr rn
Thi colle
nlo 1/ e onl
gicol \' ewJ'
soplwu anI
Irends 01 cl
country. Th.
wIth the
democrocy (
The book
h 1967 RI
In olher words, lqbd! re\!iluie(\ the- ptllitiC<i1 philO!inphy ()J ff'lolm .....
Islam os ,)11 of Ih(' nillion"l feelings (II Ihe $\lhjl1\.!dtcd Pl'u
pies ... an approach to which, Rilv(' It primarily "n
anti_imperialist nng. He did not Invest the tenn with o'\nl1-1 hndu Imphr.e_
lions, and ascribed the practice in colonIal India of opposi ng Mushm
nationalism to Hindu nationalism to the peculiar status of the Ml1slim
minority ana the colonial condition of the CO\lntry-oll of which wat;
true enouRh. The history of the Indian hberiltion movemellt abounds, in
examples of Hmdu-Muslim patriOtiC unity, Even d
l
. the hell::ht of the
struggle lor Pakistan statehood, thE'fe were plenty of instances of joillt
action by the leadership and rank and file of the Indian and Pakistan
movements against the manoeuvres of the colonialists. The appearance
of anti-Hindu trends in Muslim nationalism, which were contrary to the
spirit of solidarity of all the peoples of India fighling against colonialism,
must be blamed on feudal and imperialist influences rind the tradl!\Ona1
"divide and Jule"
The importance 01 Muslim nationalism did not wane after the
establishment of Pakistan, the basic contradictions of whose contempora-
ry economic and political development are directly reflected in its ideology.
The main contradiction remains that between Pakistan society and im-
perialism. Except for the once privileged big feudal landlords ousted
during the coup which has gone down in Pakistan history as the Revolu-
tion of 1958, the temper of the populace remains anti_imperialistic. The
big bourgeoisie, grown much stronger in recent years, have been busy
defending their independent economic and polilical positions. They have
sought Ihe help of the socialist camp in solving the tasks of creating an
independent economy while holding to the capitalist road of develop-
ment, and shunning radical changes and the spread of socialist ideas.
Although their ideology follows the anti-imperialist line, it reveals a
deep-going ambivalence.
The mam internal contradictions 01 the country lie in the sphere
of relations between the different social strata, and also between the
centre and the specific linguistic areas-especially between East and
'West Pakistan.
IS an mar e are The bourgeoisie connected with the commo" P,k' , k ,
against the growing business activity of the petty and middle bourgeoiS
of East Bengal and the small l\nguiStic regions of the Western
Provmce, The dIsharmony between the drive for s"P'" 1 .. a-na IORal centra-
isation, on the one hand, and national autonomy on 'h 'h ' , eo er, has dlled-
Iy affected the character of the ideol02ical struggle Th .
" , ,M 1 "" . e fuhng element
IS rymg 0 pI us 1m na lona Ism, as the ideology h' h '
. . W IC Will cement
the unlly of the country on the hasls of Islam, a,ain,' 1 1 . ,
. oca nationali sm.
Another group of Internal contradlcllons is th 1 ,
a e IClted by the
2rowth of cia$.!> conlllcili in the countrysl(:\e. In ord" 10 expand '1 r t
enterprise and remedy the country'. economic reludat\ h capi a IS
on 1 e bour2eO\-
fne havf' dhJ,:ned thf'llIsl.'lve dj;!d,n: 111_ forces of feuddl reaction and
;OIl! Hying ,,, Ihe- U( 1 II wh)n tl ey!lel! polenh<ll
soCldl prop. 1111s h" .. hrd bolh II: Of ocnic nd 1')\1\\:31 repHLUSSlullS (the
intrmillctlon ul <121 rl<ll1 Tetc._ s, the toystem )1 bu.c rJemx .II It' and
Ihe Ilrugj;!le the 11011 Ie (IOldIY II Jc:l I n5t uli,r. The mono-
pollstlC lea.nlllils of hili buurgel)ls,e 8H proving 01 C<luse of gro
W
,l1j;!
tensIOn belw('{'n them and the petty boJT2eolSie Tl IS 1 'ef!ected in he
ideology of the lIltelllgental<l, wh0S4 pres' ge dS soared n Kenl years,
They have -gIven voice to the anti mperLaI.!t at.tiluws 01 the middle
slTato from whom they are largely denved and e same t,me illustra-
te the duality 01 thell ".0<1\ position.
The creation of a Pakistan home industry has increasal the SIte and
social imporlance of the working clasS, Its proletarian ,deoloj;!y has begun
,
to exert an influence on the 60cial thinking of the democrallc I>Ctlons
of the population, but due \0 the peculiarities of the country's economic
and political development, It does nol exerl a defi'litlve :nfiuence as yet.
Under the conditions Just described, Islam and IqlJol's interpretation
01 Muslim natIonalism, as the present work "hows, contillue \0 play an
important lole in the predominant trends of Pakistan philosophy, moral.,
ethicS and pohliCs,
The theoriSts of the ruhng bloc ano numero'..l'; representatives of
the middle ')tr;lta are still drawing inspiratIOn from the teachings 01
Iqbal. In modern Pakistan, where Islam has been procldimed the offiCial
idE'Ology, its viability comes not so much from the idea of a !l,iuslim na-
tion liS from the ethical and social concepts of Islam. Iqbal spoke out in
his day as a paSSionate crillc of aU forms 01 (Jf man by man,
but he also made It plain that he d:d not e::her the rOdd of Lhe
capitalist West or thal of socialist Rus,.la suiwble [o[ A",a. He
ed the great tran!>formin2 role of Islam the key to the speclfil develop-
ment of the East. The moral-ethical solullon of \'Ital soCial prob:ems sug-
gested by him is now being elaborated by the philo:.ophers of Pakistan.
as Stepanyants shoWS in her es:>ays. Thi" lrend of Muslim 0lI- )
tionalism is what the theorisLs of the ruling bloc are putling up against
both the imperialist ideology of the West and the ideology of socialism,
Iqbal's interpretation of Islam and Muslim na\lonalism fits in nicely
with the notion of the feasibility 01 a special "middle road". To lhis he
principally owes the popularity of his teaching in Pakistan.
As the ideas of sociahsm gaIned ground, the ideologIsts of the dif
ferent began to come forward With theories 01 Muslim SOCIi-115m
A Pakl'itam said ill the middlo::: 01 the 1950's relerrin& to
capitalism and communism that "neither of the twO 'Isms'" could solve
"a man's problem",3 In his view, it could be solved by Islamic socialism,
, AM M' k Labour Problem:; QIId Policy ill Pakisloll. p. 41.
,. a I
A numb,
have appe
other cour
backgroum
fOrmal/on,
well as po
nomic de
country sir.
been publi!
in
,,"fio(/,
Tlli.'! colJ
into the ont
gical \' iew
lOp/letS an
trends of CI
country. Til
with the
iemocracy
The booJ
the 1967 R,
which presupposes the atldinnwnt of t111olJl!h llluri1! per.
fectlon anu educdtion in tht' SPllit (,I Isldul.
Exponents of the deolo!.!}" hd\'t' ,l1so bpE"n hJl eJ.
laUng with the ideas of svclohm <lnll '.I llIiddlE" rUdtl' ill
to win the masses to thelT side. ACtUdlly then positIOn is 11I111I1C,11 j,y
and large not only to the 01 hut en'n to the more pro_
gressive aspects of Iqbal's religio-phllosophicdl reform of Islam, hiS con-
ception of bourgeois democracy, h.s utopian view of social justice, his
humanism.
In opposition to them, the progressive-minded intelligentsia have
advanced their ideas on a democratic, non-c<lpitdlist road of develop_
ment and radical solution of the tasks attendant on the independent exis-
tence of their country, ideas which are also frequently clothed in Islamic
garb, for ,the ideas of a distinct IslamiC road of de\elopment perSist.
The essays collected in the present volume acquaint Ule reader with
the philosophical, ethical, social and political views of the different social
slra,ta and so shed light on the philosophical foundations of Pakistan
society and main trends in Pakistan social thought. They are thus of greal
sclenlific and practical interest.
L R. Polonskayo
,
,
AUTHOR'S PREFACE
There have been many Soviet studies of the processes
taking place in the national-liberation movement. But one sphe re that
has received little &ludy as yet is that of the social consciousness of the
peoples of the young sovereign ,>lates, which reflects the posi-
tions of different classes and social groups. These positions are impor-
tant to an understandIng of both the changes already under way in those
countries and the prospects of their further development.
True, quite a few articles ha\e appeared on the natlOnal-
hberalion movement in which the authors have examined the concepts
of the various "national" socialisms III considerable detail, ; The speCifics
of the formation of the social consciousness of the countries of ASia,
Africa and Latin America are comprehensi\ely discussed in volume VI
of The History 01 Philosophy.! And still, knowledge of the general laws
and peculiarities of the development of philosophical and political
thought in these states IS hampered by the almost complete absence
of special studies of this nature on the indlv!dual countncs. The
purpose of the present book is to help fill lack. 'f only to some
extent.
Pakistan is one of the states where the national bourgeoisie has had
a leading role in the nalional-ltberation movement. and which on gain-
ing political independence has taken the capitalist road of develop-
ment.
The capitalist system of economy is gradually squeezing out the
feudal way of life there, bulthe process has pro\ed a very protracted
one and at this stage both systems continue to exist s:de by side. Feudal
elements as before constitute an independent poHlical force; the
bourgeoiSie share political power with the landlords.
I "Natsionalno-osvoboditelnoye dvizhenLye i solsialny progress',
Kommunisl, No. 13. 1965; KN. Brutenls, '0 nekotorykh osobennostyakh
sovremennogo natsionalno-osvoboditelnogo dvizheniya, VOPI0SY fJlosotli.
1965, No. I, No, 6; Y. Ostrovityanov, "Sotsialisticheskiey doktriny tax-
vivayushchikhsya stran: formy, sotsialnoye so<!erzhaniye", oM/roveye
ekonomika i mczhdunorodniye otnosheniya, 1964, No.6.
Istoriya Iilosofii, vol. VI, chap. 13, 1965.
/I
A numb
have appE
other caUl
backgIoun,
IOfmalion (
well as po
nomic d
coun/IY sir
been publi.
acl!vilr In
coli
In/o the on,
aical ... :w
:tOp/I I"S an
fends 01 (
country. Th
wilh the
democracy
The boo}
'he 1967 R
the coexistence 01 thest' two ruhoR c1,lSs('s has not jll{'dlll]f'11
biller economic, political and Hlt'olos:!i('dl struJ;:J;:lc Iwtwccn Iht'm. In Ihi!
sphere oi social consciousness Ihis has ollen expressed Itself e
..
struggle between two ideologies, feudal and bourgeois. As for the other
classes, their ideological positions are very weak. The petty bourgeo
. . ISle,
SOCIally, economIcally and culturally retarded are still under the mnue nee
of the landlords and ulama, on the one hand, and the ideologiSts 01
the big bourgeoisie, on Ihe other. In bolh cases, Ihe petty bourgeoisie
have evolved their own interpretations of the philosophical conc@pts
of the ruhng classes and even endowed them with democratic connota
tions.
In many of the developing countries, including Pakistan the cia
t" . ' ss
ac IVlty of .the proletariat, owing to its numerical and organisational
weakness, IS confined chiefly to the sphere of economic and
struggle. The often partiCipate in the democratic movement
under the leadership of lefl bourgeois elements.
_ social and economic levels of development explain the
slmllanty of the of the young states of the East and com-
mon content of theIr socIal consciousness. Since these countries have still
the . of their colonial past, they occupy
-d I same 10 the world economic system. Accordingly the
I ogy of broad soci.l strata, irrespective of other SOCial' and
national specifics, shows a common anti-imperialist trend.
Futher -progresse in the forme I'
depends on how fast they _ r co ontal or semi-colonial countries
can gaIn e<:onom- - d
have a stake in their autarky t th IC m ependence. All classes
excep e sections of . t th
ialist connections. The overall t".. socle y wi imper-
d an I-Impenalist mood h d
ten ency to contrast the spiritual World of th as engen ered a
work out philosophical concepts ins ir d e and the East and
hons. p e by dlstmct national tradj-
. It is at this pOint that the role and I ..
tlonal spiritual heritage are usually m .p ace of religIon in the na-
agmfied' somet
even completely identified. The conditions f h" lmes the two are
h . d dot elr histori I d
ave m uce these countries to mould th . ca eve!opment
liberation movements in religiouS form the of 1heir national-
s, us mien 'f . )
nature of their social consciousness. Sl ymg the religiOUS .
Tn Pakistan, aside from all the
th . common co t 'b
e persIstence of religion as the mostd n n uUve factors
_ WI espread h' '
explamed by the circumstances unde h' p IlosOphy is to he
statehood. r w Ich Pakistan achieved
The basic thoo t I re lca motive for the found r
contained in Muslim nationalism, an Ideol a Ion of Pakistan was
n ,. I d' ogy which di t
a Ions In n la, the Hindus and the "W s IOguishect two
Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the leader of the eo;re nation," said
t"ln and hold Ihat Muslims and Hindus are two rna' India. "We main-
JOr nations by
n ay
rkhrlltlOIl I,f le.f III I Ie tlnn. We dfC ,1 natIon of d hundred million. <lnd
..... h,ll 1'5 mow WI! ,He d Ildlioll With ollr own cuHurClnd
c .... IIIS.IIIO/I. dnd literature, art dnd arch,lec:.:\ure, ih)01C Jlld
nom{'nri<.ltUf(', 5('1lS(! 01 v.1lue dnd proport!on, legal l..tws and InO; 1 c'
C:lIslntni dnrl c,I\f'ndilr. history and traditions, at\itudf! dnd ambitions. lfl
;hol , we hdve OIlT own d,stinctive ou.tlook on life ana r-' lile By al' can
ons of 1I1terndtiontli ldW, we are a Nation'"
Mlt'lim ndlion<lhsm W(lS extremely It rellec',ed the
intent of upper dnd lower middle-class MllSlims in colonial Indid to gain
thrOlIRh Islam If) the hearts of other members of lheir faith anu
stimuLate them to political action and unily In the struggle against im-
perialism and for independence; hence its characteristic identification of
the concepts of religious and national unity.
In the separation of the Muslim community the Musltm landlords
for theIr part saw a means of safeguarding their c:ass dod political
interests, while the Muslim bourgeoisie looked to it Lo help them in their
competitive st ruRRl e with the stronRer J::roups of thc Hindus
and Sikhs.
The form(ltion 01 this ideoloRY was further stimuldled hy the fact
that nOUfReois theorists made Islam a panacea lor var ,ou<; :":,,c'lIl
and pictured Muslim unity as if it were a kind of supra-class ulllly, and
the Islamic state as a state best suited 10 ensure national and social
prol::ress.
The overall rehgious character of the ideology of the liberation
movement did not rule out differences in the interpretation by each
class of religious principles or in the approach of one or another class
to their practical a.pplication.
The d:fferences stood out most sharply aller the of
political independence when the time came 10 put into effe.t Ihe sloqans
and programmes that had been proclaimed during the liberation struggle.
Two diametrically opposite trends appeared in the religious iele-
ologies, one of which may be described as orthodox and the other ao;
reform. The orthodox Muslims include the revival-SiS and the trdJ;liona-
lists (chieny the organisations of the mullahs and ulaHlil known as the
Jamaat-i-Islami, the Jamaat-ul-ulame-e Islam and' the .Iamaat-ul-ulame
Pakistan). The former demand the "purification" of Islam and retllrn to
the Muslim teachings of the first four caliphs. The latter emphasise
respect for tradition and a return to the interpretations Islam was given
by the medieval jurists, thus excluding all ('hange rej:!a.rdess of
whether it derives its orientation from the pas\. the pcesem or the
fulure.
J Quoted from A. Beg, The Quiet Revolution, p. 34.
13
A numb
hm:e appt
other COUI
bac glo'Jn
fOlmation (
well as po
nomit. d
c,)urotry sIr
be n pub"
oc .. ., Iy It;
f: - 1.
r I. 01'
;.) ".C or.
1ical " cw
"p1. c: ar.
lrend3 01 c
count '}' Th
wIth the
deJ'1l.O(: racy
T f lC b( ,01
the 11)67 R
The sOCIa] ha!;e 01 ihl!; ollhndnxy IS made IIp "I tl
Ie Ilia ... ..
laI"dlords and r ight-wing bourgeoiS who have ahRlleU themselves .. ..
the feuoat system of economy. They have taken an reacti
With
Ty stan:! with regard to private property, back the idea of a
re IglOUs
mona rchy_ decry the equahly )f the sexes end the religious m ..
, monhes
an:i so :m. '
Pte :leas Jf 'e\'jvallsm are abo supported to :-,ome denre b
. ",eythe
sections of the petty bourgeOIsIe. artIsans and peasantry wh (
o Otm a
soc al stTiltlIIl eaSily submerS:!ed 1 the course of capild]ist de \'e'
T
' ..' .0Plnen!.
hc) the )nes who often cnliclse capltal!!>m \I.' hil e idea lis
., . lIlg pre.
capltd.hst social eel lOmic relatlons,
Revivalism has lisa attracted those bourgeois intellectu I
a s who
would like to believe that adherence to the patriarcha l past II
.' .. WI make
It easier 0 resist the IOfluence of the bourgeois West.
As. pi )duc ion md sl)cial relations develop and the feudal
(
system
) e- gradually gives way to the capitalist mod. o( p d
t'1 . fa uctlon
. e wed lrises for all the components of the superst ructu'. '
1 , including
religIOn, 0 _ le iccommodated to the new base. In the fore ign and some-
ll'es he SOVle. hterature thee chi nges in 'he sphe,.
. of religIOn are
64 :netl mes ....a1led Illodernisa\ions, but the term hardl
t C c of th Y expresses the es-
e ph,"nomenon. RehglOn kee 5
t:lrpugh tl;. blStA _y unde h p on bemg modernised all
ano so " poht ll:.a:1 S'l IC rIle eollm= of changes in the socia-economic
re: glon ... nl : synon"' n10US . h y. That kInd of moderniSdtion of
1 relOln1 which ' I
cllanges, bl.t l,rHe.lI :evisl' 1 01 ,.' Imp les not small
, S Ie IglOUS dogmas dnd bel . ,
IIp.es . . U' .).l requ"es ,I t SIC pnn
10 sOCiet y h \I 1
nt:w "tuge of dev . s d IdVe f:'ntered upon a
e,()p.r. en conn t d
!fJ'J.e, oo"m c strue lure. ec e With changes III the
In the voting sovere.gn , I" tes ,:>1 he East .
upon power beg. :. '0 ,an lor reI ,he IldllOnal boulgeoisie
.nterpre aLl an of reI g,;,.js Jogmd!O Th ,glOU' reforms dnd lhe rdllonal
d . do hdt w th
epr .v,ng ih,. rival feudal ddSS ,)f Ih, - two ends III mind:
I,. (I . e I t' olog cal w
. on a crs ,I. and at lhe same' 1 . edpon medlf:'val re-
" ,llle () tUtn'Il" I . ' .
2,(al prop for .ne ba:.lIgeo.s:l":_ .. Into an ic.leolo-
For illl the Imp!)) lilnCe 0' "
e. glo)J. I th
of the develop,ng II (.dn, ' J e -(>(. dl COIlSC ousness
, .10 I}e Ie!:il l I j ,
mllnt til the (JulllJok of illl I e, as a dom-
10. asse <;
economic and I' I 5e( tlons of
ell urd plogr'!> He .. t b b, so, Jety SOCIal,
d
I "l.y ,
enL.es. . $ w '1t secular ten-
The &oC1&l eOl1$Clousness 01 1'1 n"'lOn
tllone; the enltre course 01 hlS.tOIH.II d-. ,IS IlOt lJy
.. , its beine
(ant role_ <I v'>'y
impor
4 G. Jddlll, PrNJ/dt'nllol AdJrl:"", p_ II.
14
TI>" 0 v ) of e w J .t wo S and fo rmal )Jl 01 the
;;JC h ,t ;!,!I)p Ie -)1 nls f, he apP'Mal,..:e )1 i I Idenl y
mon Ii II hl' _H'H'loping ,unlrlcs, 101 caeh 01 the c\ilsses w IhuUl
cx<.:eplion to wad .. out ts. own att,'ude 10 Ihp deus )1 socI"li ,11) , This
tenden:y akes .he mos] di\'e rse formS". t rom aUempts to c ealc
'nahonal" theottes of sociahsm, on the one han:l, to anti communlsm .
on llf other
The exsten(e of he t wo ldS ."1pt'ned lp I. the pe)ple.;
who have won the: r political :ndependence of
chooslDR between capitalism and SOCIalism. Thus the ideological struRgle
is now focused on the t<l sk 01 el<lborating the theoretical princi ples 01
the economic, polItical ilnd spiri tual orS:! ilnisation of the future SOCiety.
TIle imparlance of untl erstdnding the salient {edtures 01 this struggle
in the indi\'idual coulllries has dIctated the subject matter 01 the follow-
ing ess<lYs.
The main sources used hy the author were the works 0f the prom-
inent Pa kist ani phIlosophers, and theologians H A. HakIm,
!'-l ;" 1. Shad. C. Ch, Of' \'. B. A_ Da- . I. H. Qureshi. Abu! Ala ;"faudoodl
and olhers. t>.falldoodis reputalions as the foremost if 'lot the only
of lhe ;"lusLm orthodox tradit ion on the sllbconLnent :s well
kn(Jwn.
For various reasons progressive philosophical and socioloS:!ical ideas
have not rece ived profcund theore: .cal elaborat!on as yet 1n Pakl_
They are encountered mostly III the progJalnmatic document<; of some
of the political partie!;, There are two works by proRresslye ilulhors
whi ch Me Interesting ill thiS resppct: the pilmphlei by Fer07.e ud-Din
Mdnsoor (ill Urdu), a critique of the ideas of Maudoodi
ilnd <lctivity of the Jdmuilt-i-!slami, ,lIul the book by M. Ashraf Policy
0: tlw In(/;on (ill Urdu), ,Ill alldlysis of the essence of Muslim
Jlut IOII<.lliSnl_
III ildtliliulI- to we have disCI drdwn 011 the publicd-
tilJlIS ot thl;' P,lkist<lll Philosophicdl Congress. These are. primanly, the
illlJt\ldl dnd tuticlec; in the Pakistdll Philosophic/,1 Jour-
nal,
\\'hile it is almost dll exclUSIve privilege of memhers of the Pakis-
tan dCddenllc world to disCuss philosophical problems, it is quite com-
mOil fo], ,)(heidls ,Ifld public figures 10 deliver opinions on problems of
ethics, politICS dnel eco/lomicll. With that. in mind we have !Wen fit to
I:se <IS SOUI( e IIldteridl /lol only thl' type of special theoretical study
llI(>lIliuJ\(.'Ii dUoVe, hul also the pert(xilcal press of Pakistan, parlleu14rly
the two ledding newspctpers, PakIstan TImes and Dawn. as well a'J
olhclal state documentl and Ihe progrlunmatlc publications of the poU-
tical parties.
We have likewise found a aood dul of valuable InformahoD iO the
16
A numb
have
other cour
backgroun
formation I
well O.! po
nomic d(
country sir
been publi
activity in
p,-'riod.
This call
."hers
_01
mon,,,..
.JIIt Ute
I II
('ons\I\U'Il\ A.sclllhly lind Ih(' rt'port
II It'
dislurham:es of 19'):\, 'Ic'
There is prdclic..llly no SIX'd,11 !LIN,IIlne on .ubJ .....
. I fi, Ih The- t!pvt'lnpnwnl (II ph I IOliophlcal
III t Ie rs ree ".,.. .
Pakistan is COWT('ti in d bu"kll'I hy 'lhl' Ht'l).:I.11l priest R V
hi
' I I '"uppl,JIlenl'o Iht' /1I/t'rIIlJ/lPn/I/
pll IS I'( ,I'> <
ler/y.
De Sm't has been :n Indld SllIel'" 1958
had ocCdsion to participate in mun)' SI':-iSIOnS (11 Ih(' Pdkillan
cal Congress. His work is infoTIll,llln' III 1l,lhll(' and prESlmli
!lapses or the philosophical views Il\Uprt'lIt scholars on
which hdv{' come up for consiilel"dlioll llI(lstly al Ihe sympoela
sessions. Thus il is somethinQ hk(' d refNe-ncc hook on the
of the
There are several articles in which one i',lt\ ti nd
maries of Ihe views of Pakistan's prominent tlllnkers
works.'
The situation is a little better with respect 10 the literature
Utical problems. Most fully reflected in Ihis Iilerature is the
gioal struggle Which has flared up around the question of
oreanisation of 'pakistan SOCiely. The most important
""'by t. H. Qureshi, A. K. 8rohi. G. W. Choudhury, Z.
K. B. Sayeed and the Western scholars W. C. Smith, L
('alieni and others; they examine the problem of Islamic
HI .lDterpretaUOD by repres entatives of the two main trend' In
poUUcat dloulht- the orthodox thinkers and the reformists.
of tbe bdluential organisation
--It detailed consideration.
Tbe _'""or of the essays has also drawn on the a:enereJ
1bIakn, .".., 118 the book of the West European scholars
the recently published two-volume Hlslory
bourgeois lslamists, the wodt. or
S. N. Grigoryan, N. A. Smimov and
role of '_lam in the modern world,
Glbb. W. C. Smith' and articles from
otbOl Jouma1l.
01 PaJd.tan. Debate.
Act II 01 1054 to
the CommluJon on
Activity In PGklIlan"
PaJrlalan, B.A:. Dar,
In II I 1)f1 1 Ih I poUUallDd.
I LI "LII' of Jlh IOllOphi I nd lot cal thouetat lD PaIdIIaa.
oIlll1l"r I I 1\ RUlIll I by the work 01 the SovMt OIlent'UTl bl.f4 ....
"lilt ]111111 pili III A M Dy kQv, L R Pc'onhye, Y V GaDkor*r.
N. P .. ntkt-y,v, L 1 YUfl!'Y h. and others 1b: 'II an tD .,
I "lit 1I11 Ii ,nil 01 tllf' IhPme Illk n up by L R Po..,... t.,.. lD her __
f:J 'Lph Muslim Twnds III 'he Social Though, 01 'M" aa::I Po"'shr
nil! dulhor Wolf helped by the adYke and .. Mil"'" 01_
\Ol1NRul S tn the [)epdrtmenl of Philosophy and SodQk,&f of tile .-e.
U.SSR. A"ult-my {J( Sc ence !nlilule 01 PbUOI'opby. for wblcb ..
N"olild like to etlend them he heartfelt gral tude.
A numb!
have appe
other coun
oockgroum
forma/ion (
well as po.
nomic de
sin
bu?n publi ..
]C Iy rn
p
TIJ col/.
nla 'he onl
gJc]1 v w
.,,,1 c-" an
tren<:ls )t 'I
country Th
wIth : he
:it.m?crQcy
T e boo"
.'lc ; 967 Rl
I
PROBLEMS OF ONTOLOGY AND GNOSIOLOGY
IN PAKISTAN PHILOSOPHY
The of Pakistan were laid long
befo\'(: he formation of the State of PakIstan. Thi" illu-
ne of the laws of the devElopment of social
thought. to wit "But the philosophy of every epoch. since
it is a defin te sphere of the division of labou r, has as its
presupposI'ion certain definite thought mntci:ial handed
down to H y ts pledecessors, from which it takes its
start:" Pakistan philosophers drew, their cogitative mate-
nal frem main sources: classical medieval Mus-
lim chiefly Sufism; the objective idealism
nf 1hp W :st the bourgeois reconstruction of Islam in
, d<
n la.
mmed.ate preCUl'Sors of the contemporary philos-
opher 01 Pak <; 3.n were three outstanding Indian Muslim
Sl ah iulhh (1703-1762), Saiyid Ahmad
Khan (16 < 1l93) and Muhammad Iqbal (1873-1936)<
Thes" nal 1t p -t land <k < h <
.. mal S In t e reconstructIon of
hJam In( 3. om Whl<ch th t (f < h<
, e con en 0 PakIstan p I-
I" "phl:<:I t-oUjh 1 derived
Sh"; W lJ Illlah I ved at th
f '1 ( '" " e Irne of the breakdown of
(: 1 - v, and In formulati ng h is teach in s the hi-
losoPl er WiL 1111 "cd by a desire t f' ct g p
inlT tha t (iew. I) m a way of rcgenerat-
>:> answcrs to unde '1 . 1< <
s( cial 11 d econom 'c proble . I I ymg re IgiOUS.
ms ay, he thought < I d< ,
p.1S. m he e;:u'l v fe11dal age' h " In n la s
I ,lam . . 1n t e conceptions of early
\"
1 \ J
ri,
llht- jcctiv d
i t c"irt!s notwitil"t'ndl<ng<
I. U HI '-C l l1 lL>"
h 'I( lflu<' nce of the'
A"'( III e"11 r ot hav.,. ..,. . new
P
l It ,I cft.,cl 11 f each l g t.' d but whose
.. 0 degr '> Th
l S I I pi c' n ""' .11 :1t be o f justifies
th(> bourg(>ois
F L ': f!l to C f> .1mJdl, ,)( Cle' '-7
. p. 495.
/R
I'cfOI" )i L n II d I jf k Ig II e n'lt 'nat na-
ture" of hb phil0;ophy. which 'qUem ted a Jothe,)ls of
old and nt w in II" leI ) achiev{ a cgell(. _ f ' 1usli m
society
To substantial 1 ,he pm ....,lbility of r forn , Shah.
Waliullah argued that thue was a difi -renc..:- between t he
essence of rcligious principles and he ... m 0 t heir
expression, and that while the latte TIltJI t change
depending on the conCl"pte historical com
1
'hom. thf> 'Oimer
were a1ways immutable. Therefore the two COl Id not be
identified. The thing was to dbclose the meaning 01 reli-
gion in concepts that accorded with the ,jpb'it (If the new
times, for It was not: wise to go on the inle1pl(C',1.tion of
religious canons handed down from another agl' . Thus
Shah Waliullah refuted t he views of the t heologians who
insisted t hat in t he 18th century it was still necessary to
follow t he interpretation of Muslim dogma which was
acceptable in t he 10th century. He saw .he reason for the
crisis in Indian societ y in t hat his counLYF.en \vere still
using an obsolete> and no longer suitable [ " n .1 'If expres-
sion of the religion of Islam. As Iqbal f')in1(: ri (IUt. " per-
the first Mu:-:1im (in India,- M.S.) \vr.:, felt the urge
of a new spirit in him was Shah Waliullah",4 In l he final
analysis this reorientation or reform of religion meant its
purifi cation from the accretions of t ime. and CI nsequently.
its r eversal to early Islam. The "new' form which was
supposed to express its t rue essence prov nOh ng bu a
renovated ve rs ion of early medievel Islam.
The contradictions in Shah Waliullah' s philosophy
made it possible later on for his ideas t o be u ...ed by
resentatives of two quite opposite trends of
thought. The ideologists of the feudalists In
preserving medieval relations called for regeneratIon on
the hasis of the pul"iflCation of Islam and {'\"en a to
t.he social, economic and political practices under the Ilrst
four caliphs. The bourgeois reformers of Islam, on the othel
hand, emphasised the diITcl'ences t.he form .and
essence of religion, the necessit.y of bnngmg '.he mto
cOl'l'espondenee with the crmcce1e historical c ndltlOlls. the
role of idjtihad. etc.
LR IV \IUSI;'l [u-, n 111
India (Ind P(lJ;r:,IUII. p.
01 Pld/o.,ophr and ,V(.'' ...rn vO
( ;0.1, lqu< L 1'1lC Ul'e,}pslrl/( /h)l1 of Ilc'I! . .Jus Tl 1(J
2'
/QI n.)ught 01
I.
! II' . /I.". p. !l7.
A numl
have app
other cou
backglOul
formal Ion
well as p,
nomic a
country 81
bf'cn pub/
JClidlr
oeriod.
Thl COl
/110 /III! Of
gical dcv
tophcrs a
trcnds of f
counlry. T
with the
democracy
PIC bod
he 1967 J
in the wake of Shah the (lC
cessity of reorienting Islam 111 tt'l"ms of. ;;'C1CI< vi. f'C. rl(,.
mic change and the development of !'ClCnt c n" I! 19c
was posed by Saiyid Ahmad Khan, and he W," h
n
f 'to
work out the principles of s.uch a .new on .
Saiyid Ahmad denved his ongu: fr"lT. 'he-
upper stratum of MuslIm ,m. I?dla . Bul hi.s
ideas transcended the traditional fC'u?al 1 1deology
and his political credo th.(' .vlews of 1.he
shed small landlords and the mClplCnt MuslIm boul"qeois
class.
Saiyid Ahmad Khan appeared on the scene at a time
when the critical question of the future of their communi-
ty stood before his fellow Muslims. Theirs was not a so-
cia1ly homogeneous community: on the eve of the British
conquest it consisted of two unequal groups, the ruling
feudal aristocracy and the great mass of poor tenant
farmers. most of them former untouchables. The conquest
of India by the East India Company bl'Ought about the
downfall of the Mogul Empire and the loss of theil' polit-
ical power by the Muslim aristocracy. Then the colonialists
undertook to weaken the latter's economic posi tions as
well and set about creating a new landlord class made up
of Hindu money-lenders and merchants, who were to
become the mainstay of British rule. The Wahhabi move-
ment and the upising of 1857-1859 further streng-
the anll-Muslim trend of British policy,
yhe brutal persecution of the partici-
m. upnsmg the helplessness of
theIr positlon, the MuslIm anstocracy concluded that their
anI?, c0ll;rse was to make the Britb,h authorities change
their athtude towards them. Saiyid Ahmad Khan was the
first to su.ggest a fol' the restitution of the
former mIght and prestige of the Muo]' "t
d th d
Ot' 1m commUnI y
un er . e con 1 lOns of colonial India Th'
. . ded fi t f r . , . IS programme
PlOdVI 'drs!,. orlPto ltlleal collaboration with the British,
an secon, 01 cu ura and educati( 1 ... .
This thinker' s political' ma mcasUiI.. . ..,.
g
ive special considerat ion s (to. which w(- ;;hn11 not
contnbuted t th th
of communalistic tendencies; a<; [f r h' . . ,0. e gro,,:
ities these played a POSl"ll"ve I)' IS C'Chc<1lional acllv-
, . 'rO('ll1th I'
Muslim intelligentsia and M I' e Vq ut Ion of a
. '. tl<; 1m trend' f L " "
soclal thought m colomal India. S I) l')ul geOls
'. M. Iqbill, Iqbal and Ahmadism, p. 2'1.
20
One of th .... main tOI' the Muslims' loss of their
leading posltiom, aceording to Saiyid Ahmad Khan. wa ...
their fanatical att<\chment to religiOUS dogmas
\md their dislike of modern \Vestern civilisation. In 1864
he founded a Scientific Society (first in Ghazipur and then
in Aligarh), the aim of which was to propagate Western
culture. The society busied itself with translations into
Urdu and the popularisation of English literature. After
a trip to England in 1870, Saiyid Ahmad Khan began to
publish a journal whose purpose he explained as follows:
1< The Muslims of India should be persuaded to adopt
the best kind of civilisation so that the contempt with
which the civilised people look upon the Muslims should
be removed and they may join the comity of civilised
people .... "6 A centre for the spread of secular education
and Western culture was established in 1877-the famous
Aligarh College, later to become the main political and
iae010gicaI seat of the Muslim communalistic movement.
For all that, Saiyid Ahmad Khan's philosophy reflect-
ed, as it was bound to do, the enormous influence of re-
ligion on the development of the social thought and the
social psychology of the wide masses of people in his
country. Like many other members of the bourgeois in-
telligentsia, he saw in religion a means of preserving the
country's indigenous culture and its OVvIl traditional way
of life.
He believed that the social and cultural regeneration
of the Indian Muslims could only be accomplished in the
final count on the basis of Islam, but he also called for the
revision of some of its tenet::;. The justification for rein-
terpretation was the premise that the Quran as God's word
must correspond to the deeds of the Lord-in othf.'l' words,
"In the modern world, which is also the work of Allah's
hands. A new interpretation was chiefly needed, in thE
philosophers' opinion, for tho..'>e verses in the Quran whose
meaning was not altogether clear and whose form was
allegorical.
Saiyid Ahmad Kh:m attached particular importance to
the revision of 0)(' social, political, economic and cultural
institutions for which no exact standards were set in early
Islam. lIt, sa id : ... It is obligatory [01' Muslims to ac<.:ept
follow thos(' traditions of the holy Prophet which
6 QUilled hom R A. J)"r. Hrliglou . Thought 01 SaJYld Ahmad Khan.
1 2,
31
A numb
have opp
other COUI
backglOun,
formation (
weJJ as po
nomic d(
country sit
b{'cn publi
activity /I.
p';o(/.
coli
nlo the on
gicai \ /cw
SCJplie's an
rends 0/ C
CouIllry. Th
with the
democracy
Tne bOOJ
he H/67 R
)
refer to religious injunctions ,\vhile with I''gard to thf)se
h
h d 1 'vith worldly nff<lIr'I ,\yt.' arc not l'llh: i u.)
W Ie ea. .' "7 ' On
necessarily to follow them. .
Saiyid Ahmad Khan that .the new mterpreta.
tion of the principles IsI,am for he called be based
upon reason as the en tenon of it uth. I:Ie defined 'm
as the "inherent capacity in man by, whlch (h .. COn.
elusions on the basis of the obSf'rvatlOll of phpn-
omena or mental thinking processes ... capaclty of man
which has enabled him to invent new thmgs and led him
on to understand and conttol the .forces of .nature . .
Thus his teachings conflicted the of t.he
Muslim theologians (ulama) of Indla who mamtamed that
the realm of religion was inaccessible to . the reason of
man and that while the word of God and hIS Prophet were
,
Absolute Truth, the reason of man was prone to erroneous
argumentation. The ulama demanded uncondi tional obser-
vance of all the tenets of the Quran, and where the holy
book did not offer clear answers, they urged believers to
put their trust in ihe authority of the theologians.
Saiyid Ahmad Khan did not deny the limitations of
individual but he was by no means a sceptic and
believed in the power of human reason. " ... The reason of
one man can be cOlTccled by that of the other and the
reason of one age by that of the other age .... It is reason
with all its shortcomings and pitfalls that can alone help
us in understanding the problems of life and religion.'9
The philosopher was highly critical of mysticism, con-
demning its scepticism and stress on the inferiority of in-
dividual reason in order to prove the existence of divine
revelation as the criterion of truth. He did not
reject revelation, tor that would have been an
of the teaching .of Islam on the Prophet and
ongm of th.e Quran. He dId try, however, to interpret
concept ratlonally.
Thu.s to him wahy (inspiration), in moments of
revel.attOn appears to an "inherent capacity",
degrees, of hvmg from the insect to
but In the latter thiS reached its .
point and became a capacity to grasp divine truth.
-
rbid. pp 27J. 274.
B Ibid. P 161.
lI)/a. pp 163 lfi4
'2
It folIc WI d lngie-all !'Om the premise that all men ar'
endowt.-d with 1JJa1iy, that any given individual hilS the
potent '"'I 'er Clild so this ]o"t supt'rnatural
connot It hf' h 0rht't n J\V apI=2al"ed in the guise 'Jf a
man. It W,ls th ' 1 belief that there are men of
geniUS not only in scif:'nce and art but also in the reJigiou$
sphere. lIn the prophets whose extraordinary gifts
enable them to grasp moral truths and explain them to
The ;)bovt:, of the of prophethood
Was an adPiptaJirn of to the condition:> of the 19th
-century and made it tn()re palatable to the new generation
vith its kaning; tow..ard rational thinking. Al the same I
time the assertion that t.he Prophet was a man, albeit one
of genius, left room for conclusions as to the historical con-
diti onality-of his thoughts, and then in turn as to the pos-
sibility and necessity of introducing corrections into the
Prophet's teachings which would take into account the
changes going on in the world. Saiyid Ahmad Khan did
not draw any such direct conclusions; he simply called for
the ration.")l interpretation of religious dogma. His crite-
rion for the determination of the truth of one or another
religious principle was that it must serve nature a<; well
as the mind, which is to say that if religion did not con-
tradict human nature and nature at large, it was true.
Nature. -in his view, was "a closed system of the universe
which obeys cpr1ain laws of mechanics and physics".
Everything in the world, from inorganic matter to man
and his intellcct, was dependent upon its laws. "The
acti ons and thoughts of man and even his beliefs are all
differcnt chains in the inexorable lmvs of nalure."lo
These idp<1s o[ the Muslim thinker did not fit in at all
with the theological viewpoint since they left no place fOi:
God. It is hardly surprising that they were subjected to
particulal'ly bittet' attacks. Djamal ud-Don aI-Afghani con-
demned Saiyid Ahmad Khan for his uncritical accept:: nee
of the definition of nature formulated by the scholars of
the 19th century, and called him a dahriya (the medieval
Muslim name for an advocate of natural philosophy, 0r
u one who b0lievf'.-> only in nature and not God").11 To th.is
the philosopher replied that his definition of n.qture dId
not rule out the reality of the existence of God, who was
I() rbid., p. 151
II Ibid.
A numt
have app
other cou
bachgrour.
for mation
well as pc
nomic d
country sL
been pub/.
aCtivily JJ
p('riod.
This co/
Into the on
gjcal ... ic\\
$Opllt'rs 01
Irends of (
TI
wIth the
Ijemocracy
Thc boo
the 1961 F
th primary source of everything. He did not even try 10
e
d
any arguments in support of thl.s conclusion h
proure fG d '.
simply admitted that the essence 0 0 was beYond
the reach of man's mind. What the study of Nature leads
one to believe is only the first .cause, .but as finlte beings
we are not capable of knowmg HIs nature and a(.
'b t "12
tn u es. . . . hI' d t
Simultaneously the philosop er ne 0 prove that,
of all the religions, Islam alone was m full accord with
natu.re. "Islam is nature," he sa
1
d, "and nature is
Islam.' 13
In support of this identification, Saiyid Ahmad Khan
advanced the proposition that Islam was a religIOn which
exclusively took cognizance of the laws of nature,. and re.
jecled prejudice and the supernatural; as he said, "th.
Quran does not support the happening of events or oc
currences that are against the laws of nature or violate the
usual course of things."14 There is no room in life for
miracles; it is simply that people do not know all the
as yet and hence some phenomena seem "miraculous"
them. Actually miracles never violate the laws of
ty and unity of nature; they only show that many of
laws are as yet unknown to us.
in
While rationally interpreting the phenomena that
ligion calls miracles, Saiyid Ahmad Khan was hesitant
admit that such thoughts were suggested to him by
own reason; he even tried, in fact) to prove that his
were drawn from the very principles of
whIch he offered a "natural" explanation of
verses In the Quran descnbmg supernatural
All the reformer's efforts to bolster his rationalistic
tion with from the Quran were futile}
Not only the Muslim theologians of his time but
contemforary Pakistan philosophers regard' his
of the supernatural as proof of his lack of faith
fower of God, whom they believe capable of
any miracle in defiance of the laws of t
d Kh
' 't' fi na ure
Ahma an s cn 1CS nd fault with his . 'nir
and his whole conception of God on
h
. th ld" , or mg to
everyt Ing In e wor IS Interconnected by a chain
p. 179.
13 Ibid., p. 156.
H Ibid., p. 182.
15 Ibid.
,
In contrast to the ulama, the ac1voc<1 j 's or a m.odcrll
view of Islamic democracy ,wonwn shoU'? hav('
definite rights to participate In social hfe. Th' constItution
permits them to elect and be elected to the Country'S
supreme body, ArtIcle 2? reserves the 15f
seat. in the NatIOnal Assembly fO! them. th,ee flam each
of the two provinces, and this does not exclude the possi_
bility of the above quota bemg exceeded.
Nevertheless it is still too early to speak of the Complete
emancipation of women .. The nO.t even
include a verbal declaration of theu' economIc, SocIal and
political equality with men.
It behoves us to complete this analysis of Islamic de-
mocracy with an examination of the concrete forms it
took in Pakistan following the 1958 coup and up to 1967.
Parliamentary democracy was supplanted by a system
of Basic Democracies. The uderlying idea in introducing
it was that the vote of the electorate may be considered
valid only when the problems involved lie within the
range of its experience and comprehension. In other
word5, the people may be permitted to express their
opinion through the vote only on local problems with which
they are familiar. As for the solution of the larger problems
of state. these must be entrusted to the few who according
to Pakistan law are the acknowledged spokesmen of the
people.
In stJucture the Basic Democracies consist of a graded
system of councils at five levels starting with the union
panchayats. or union councils, which have one elected
representative for every 1,000 to 1,500 people; and union
committees in towns. Two-thirds of these council and com-
mittee are elected and one-third appointed on the
tecom.mendahon of departments of the next higher
councIl. All take part In the election of the legislative
bodies of the country-the provincial assemblies and the
National Assembly.
The councils of next level are called Tehsil in 'Vest
and In East .Pakistan. and comprise the
chall'men of the umon c:'1UncIls and town committees as
well as offiCIals. ar:d other persons appointed
by the commlSSlOner of the dIstrIcts. Their fUnctions include
supervision, of .the lower Councils. Then come the coun-
cils of the division COuncils with thE
same membershIp prmciple. The fact that the councils at
94
1 VPI' <In ml: 'JI'dinatf>d to those at the highC'1
the 1 the fact also that th( councils at the higher lev-
levc s ( nUn.I v of officml s and nominated persons is
sufncif'nt to enc:. ul'C' official of the :ntire sys-
qUI '-'44 In Cldcliti on, at ('ach level IS a speCial
te7hority mnde up of offlcials responsIble for the activIty
aU 11 the cot
1
ncil s. They approvE' the budgets and check
of a 'sonnel of the councils; they can prohibit any mea-
the pel d' remove .3ny member of a council if they find such
sure an
t ion necessar y. h f
ac The system of Basic per;lOcracies was made t, ,e oun-
dation of t he 1962 constItutIon.
. .. f the cardinal principles of Islamic
Ou.r ahon 0 onc1u.de that there is no complete
I.ed us to problems of the state struc-
unison In CO;tC .}' ,-jews depending on the oar-
ture. Theori st s dIffer thel e' ha 'pen to be speaking for.
ticular segments of SOCIety th :v
t
. road to an ideal 15-
. th Pakistan reac Ion . 't t'
Whereas for . e . . . 111 of many feudal lOst! U IOns,
lamie state lies through trend want to get there ?y
the spokesmen thE' .1 a , ' with modern bourgeOls-
ccmhining MU'::lin: hadltIono:;
democratic h <; theoretical differences have
As might be expectc0: t e. e
iS
almost that the
affected legislative It they do the relatIOn of
laws of Pakistan, be" in the nature of com-
h unifY S 0
forces in t e co - .' . the problem of
promisee; . c1 conflicts day As before.
The debates an e not abated to 1. . 'them each
the state forces are, 'Of an
various soclO-f'olown interpretatlOTIarter of a century )
committed to t raised about a qu 'a-class democracy is
Islamic st.ate, I S some kind of that cha-
But the of way to the s?bedl bv the real positIon of
gradually gIvmg ; detennme .
raciel' of the state IS
social forces.
er 1<160
Today, .
Pakistan
,d
6:
loy
esJ
. ,
'e<
'm.
Ik i-
Ihe
:Ics
lhe
ther
sIan
and
sIan
,
Appendices
PHILOSOPHICAL AHD SOCIOLOGICAL CEHTRE
OF PAKISTAN S
The Pakislan Pllilosophical Congu.'ss i' the l' f h'
:iatlon in the country alHI W,lS founded p Ilosophical asso-
iosophers of the subcontinent belonged 1 II' lIor to 1947 the phi
Congress established by S. Radhakrishnan"; Ie IndIan PhilosophIcal
)f the organisation of the Pakistan C III 1925, The moving SPirit
who b ' ongress was Prof M M Sh
ecame its first president T d I . . . anI
Dr. M. Ahmed. It has a t le PresIdent of Ihf' Congress )s
010
0
' , Ip of about 100 j)h' ,
" ,s,s and psychologists, most of them I osop lers, soci
members at various univers I' professors and olher faculty
C
' Ilesandcolleoes" '7 -
omm:t\ee th" ", 1>. S man Executive
'- annua seSSIOn f Ih C
of their records_ The Conoress ., 0 e and publication
10' '.. a s(" Publishes Ih" P ,
UflKl, d quarterly h'hich ha h '" oK/sinn Phi/osop/lical
Ih, , seen camino alit -
al Proceedings of In C .... Slllce 1957, as well as
o ' e on(!ress and
n var,ous philosoph:cat probl!'ms. and sympos;a
The Congress' three-day annuClI
siUes III turn (Ill Lahore, K<.lrachl are held at diff('n:mt univer-
hI, etc.). ' Y erabdd, Daccil, Peshawar, RaJsha.
The work of the sessions tak
of the sections. The sub,"'I< d es Ihe fUlm of <;ymp0SIi!
th E '" ., Iscusspd' t t dnd meetinRs
t e xeculive and may be qUIte "thle sympOSia aie by
osophy of life", "reOril?lItatlOll of M .' t e ndlure of bl?allty", "phI
natiolldl character" "exisl I'. usilln phIlosoph " '"
d ,en lahsm: a cntl I Y, I lC problem of
an the community", etc. ca examlllallon", "philosophy
Four sections hold their meet
metapl - 1llgS at th
. lyS1CS; (b) moral and Social phI e sessions: (al logIC and
catIon; (el) phdosophy of lehgion. I osophy; (e) psychology unci edu.
The Pakistan PhilosOphical
This is confirm"'d b Congress IS ,
". . .. Y the ch semiofficial
PU) ICdtlons, which are basicall aracter of its .
Islamic ideolo . y concerned with I sessIOns and
. gy, by the unfalhng presence of he POPlliansatlOn of
men! al lb meelinRs, and by the Illlancial members of the govern
all klllds of .. ern:nent !nstllutions, .ISSlstdnce it P' .
_ . . 0 htoldt. "celves from
sions. for cXilmple, the receIved R I S and n I'
s. 800(l III I ses
9/, . <111ft 10,000 respect-
,f "ldtiolldl ReconstnlctllJll (o"crnment of
P,I);lstdll.
T 14' IlfU ,11(> 1MI)...!"! )Y d rdth"'l trli'e 1nl 'rank pXClan
ge of "PIIl]!)I" '1 h,'y lit' Jltl'!ldt,d 1101 (July hy Congress memhers but
also hy IOldl Inlcll<'<lll,lls ,JlIII fvr whom they are JMrtJ(;ularly
importdnt CVl'lIls. them the l)pport:Jnlty tl, pr(>')(nt reports at the
sectIOn
The schnldlS who Ire llsll<lIly preseul at the SE:SSlOn'i Pdrtl'
eipiltE' acllvely ill Ihe :->ympoMil dnd often gIve public (I'; well.
They ure mostly phIlosophers from the l;nited States, (;redt Bnlalll,
West GermdllY, Inciid, [run, BeIRium and the Untted Arab Republic. The
first deleRatioll of Soviet philosophers (the only representatIves of the
sociahst Coulltfles) arrived 111 P<1kistdn In April 1956 to tilke pM! In the
third seSSlon ell Peshawar.
Slnce then the Executive Committee of the Pakistan Philosophicdl
Congress hilS sent Soviet scholars yearly lIlvitations; there were dele-
gati ons from the U.S.S.R. AC<ldemy of Sciences ilt the 1957, 1900, 1961,
1963, 1965, 1967 dnd 1968 sessions.
TIle Central lnslilule of Islamic Research in Karaeh:, founded in
1957, is responSIble for the coordlllation of Islam:c studIes. Tho:! leading
Islamic studies cent re is the Institute of Jslamic Culture (Lahore.).
The InstiJu/e 01 Islamic Culture, III Lahore, was set up in 1950 b,
the Governor General of Pakistan, Gulam Muhammad, at the suggestiO;}
of the prominent Islamic scholar Dr. Hahfa Abdul HakIm, for the
purpose of making the youth of Pakistan "fully conscious of theIr in-
tellectual and moral heri,tage" and show:ng the edu:a:ed people that
" the Islamic outlook and fundamental prinCiples of Islam are pre-emin.
ently capable of solvlIlg human problems-social, polillcal and econo-
mic."
The first director of the Institute was H. A. Hakim. On his death in
1959, he was succeeded by Prof. M.M. Sharif. in addition to its own
. 'th monthly TllOkafal, it publishes about ten books annually.
Journa, e
. -I foundation brought out more than 80 books and pamph.
havIng sInce IS. -
I
'
the works of the Muslim thl!lkers Ruml, Ghazzah,
lets on Islam, P II
'd
Sa,y
id Ahmad Khan and others.
Ibn Ha UIl,
. r Islamic Culture is financed by the celltrill Govern
The Inslltll1e 0 .-
._ n (from which It receIves Rs, 75,000 a year) and the
menl of (Rs. 25,000). Iils publishing actIVIties bring
West PakIstan f money; In 19631964 ils book sales totalled
in a good deal 0
Rs. 2,487,500. (KarachI) was established in 1951, by the Iqbal
The Iqbal Madem,)' ent in order to popularise the philosophica:
A
t of Pdf lam '
AcademY c f Muhammad Iqbal both within the country and
and poetical henltlge 0
outside its bOrders.
7 3aK. 3016
cd
.,i
, 0
,
t er
om,
bkj
lhe
Ides
)he
,Iher
is/an
and
is/an
-
The president of Pakis!iHl is Itw If,llI! \. I
I
.. ' . {,l( Pit
tIe 1I1ullster for Education, Its plt'sld!'n!, It. VIce. 'J: {"'U JIJ j Ill!
and dlflx:tor are government appoinlc,-.s, lIlul its , I {side It, f( .r(
sentatJve of the Ministry of Educatiolllll I I. )drt! IIldu II l r .
h
' ( \\0 nth{'r' .,
amon'! I e lilt! meom!)t>r _ III I.,'" . e C Cd f
b h
- '.l : h(' \ r(
mem ers W 0 paid Rs. 10 d ,.",. d . l' e l}<
_ 111 lIC:;, <lIld 70 ]"f
sl2nate::i upon the payment of 1 lu I J rllt:'!llb"
( mp sum of Rs. ISO. I :Ie
The Academy receives an annual subsid f
men! of Pakistan of Rs. 25000 wh I h . Y rom the central Gov",.
_ ' , 1 e I e Income f
IS another Rs. 10,000. rom lis PUhllCatlon;
These publications lIlclude a quarte I .
nographs on the life and work of I bal r Y Journal, Iqbal Review, rno-
nto Ben,gdl: Pashia S' Ih ' q ,and Iranslations of his
English ' . lll{ I, Pers:an, Arah:c, Turkish Ge works
. . rman and
The Academy's library of 3500
works of JqJ al ,volumes brinJ::S logether ,II
) . as well as eVer Lhi the
hall. There is a plan to open ,Y. nJ:: tha,) hds wr:tten about
fllture. a specldi lqbdl Museum in the near
The Academy m' ,
ad" . amtams contacts with f " " ,
n Societies, situated in italy At. orClgn SCientific institutions
and India, which engage in ;he the Umted States, West Germany
The Pakislan /nsil t y of IslamiC culture.
G 11 I U e 0/ Human R I '
. ,I ani , is the first e allons, founded in b D
sociolo centre set up i P k' ,:, y r.
. and SOCial psycholo I . n a -Istan for research in
sldent IS the vice-chancell gy. Is office IS SitUated in Dacca It
head of th d or of Dacca Uni ' . s pre-
Th e epartment of philosoph a verslty, and its di rector the
e teachmg of sociolo' Y I Ihe same uni .... ersity
in the unive I' gy and social - h .
been se d' rSI les of Pakistan until the 19;'''YC, ology was not slarted
ID
n 109 experts there re!:!ula J . s. Smce 19.'i2 UNESCO has
ces . Hollander f h r y to heLp devel h
of 'he U ' 0 t e Netherlands J H op t ose social sci en-
, nlted States L' ' . umlum f 0 '
and Olhers). ,evi-Strauss, Bertrand P 0 enmalk, 1.S. And
In th' , . Bessa:gnet of France
. elr mvestigations the . '
fOlJowlllg methOd I' SOCIOlogists of ' '
l. The ooglcal principl es:1 Pakistan are guided bv the
, , .(1eneral dpproach
<lnd historical. Whereas in U, muus
t
not be emp!flC I '
a hi.(1hl d e nlte I Sa, UI.lt philosophical
. . Y eveloped technoLo " ( t<lles, whi ch IS " . h
statistically, in pok, " gy. SOCial h a society wit
... IS an stat P enomc
correct basis for SOcial I Istleal data IS tOo I na are described
P
ana YSIS" E ImlLed ,
urpose only where th . . mplrlca! 0 serve as d
ere IS a developed s methods can serve their
OCia]
. I See A. K. N. Karim "Th
in: Social ;lethodolORY f
Ibid., pp. 2, 3. as, PaklSfIl or d SoCiology
98 n, Dacca, 1960.
o( East
2, SOCidi litulhc., mllst he performed by the Pakishlni';
It IS diflicult fnr forelS!IIf'TS t(l ulI'lerstand the partlcuknllcs ,)1 Pakistan
society.
3. TIle (ont('mpoliuy Itfe of modem PaLs-tan cannol he comprehen.
ded without examllling 'Musltm societal mechanism", (llId tl'erefore it
IS essential I,) "develop d SOCiolo2Y ()f societ y"" slld,."l
4. In view of the country's economic reLardatlC ..n alld th'] limited
written sources from which an idea can be gleaned d':' to the operation
01 Ihe soci,d machlllery, Pakistan SOCiology lfl the imme.1 ate ]ulure will
have to be confined to social
SOVIET PHILOSOPHERS ON THE PAKISTAN
PHILOSOPHICAL CONGRESS SESSIONS
Third Session
The third session of the Pakistan Ph!losophlCal Congless held III
Apr il 1956 was attended by a Soviet delegation indudlllg M.E. Orne-Iyan-
ovsky. member of the Ukrainian Academy of SCiences. I,M. Muminov,
Corresponding Member of the Uzbek Academy ,)f SCiences. and Prof
K. M. Frolov. About two hundred people took put III the work of the
thi rd session; in addition to the Soviet delegation, it was attended by
schola rs from India , Iran, the United States and Canada.
On April II the Soviet delegation arrived in Peshawar for the
session. \Ve were tendered a very wann reception by \ts orgall'sers and
the other delegates. We would particularly like to ackuowledge the
goodwill shown us by the leadership of the and above all the
president, Prof. M.M. Sharif.
The session opened with the reading of the Quran and of
welcome. Then the bUSiness went over 10 the plenary meeting.; of the
following four secti ons: (11 logic and metaphysics; j2/ psychology and
education; (3) moral and social philosophy; (4) th: philosophy of reli :
ion. There were also sympoSia on the themes 'NaturE> ilnd Purpose'
!nd "Logical pOSitivism". In addition the pubhc lectures,
h I
"
contributed papers on Determln.sm and Quantlllll
TIle Soviet sc 0 a .'
. " J'.I E OmelyanOvsky), "Study of the History 01 Philosophy
Mechal1lcS (5 S R" II. M, Muminov). and "The Materiatist Under-
10 the Uzbek ", " IKM F )
P
ess of Social Development .. rolov. \Ve might
standin, of the roC
ead at the plenary meetHlJ!':' to
add that our papers. r at interest. The vice-chancellor of PeslMwll
eived wl\h gre
were rec R. ddin Siddiqi, a of ph}<SICS, who \001
UniverSIty, Dr. anU
"
3 Ibid" p. 3.
Ibid . p, 5 .
99
7"
thy
1"1
,
"
m,
flkl'
I!he
Ides
tho
/
Iher
sian
, ,n;
is/an
\
the floor to discuss M.E. Ome[Ydnovsky's Pilper notecl the c
. . ample-Juty
of the and went at length mlo some of its {undumental !>Oin
Frolovi -paper e\"oked many q"es:,olls reneclin, tJ '
. Ie s.e )u
thought his listeners We(e gmng to the principles which were set fo
by the speaker. rth
Prof Q. \r. Aslam, as the cha:rman of the meelmg-, up :
value of the paper although. he said, he shared Ihe views of 151'
, ,. .m.'h,
problems conSIdered In II. There were many questions I
, 00, after
I.M. Muminov's reporl.
We were deeply moved by the speech of Ihe Indian philoso h
Prof. B.L. Atrya, with it5 impassioned appeal to the session H Per,
. . e Urged
the philosophers to leave their ivory lowers and serve the pe I
." ope,to
work for world peace and seek closer understanding between Ih h'
I h [ epl
osop ers 0 all lands. We would take exception only to Prof Al
'h - . rya's
prenllse t at representatJves of all philosophical trends should d
, '[' I - a opt a
onci la ory attitude to their Ideological opponents fo, Ih 'I
' , e in erests of
sCience and the duty of philosophers to society demand til at , 'e I"
!"I h' I'd CI n I c
P II osop Ica I eas be promoted and that reactionary views refuted bv,
science be criticised.
Dr. P. Schiltp, an
American philosophy professor, gave a lecture
on Einstein.
.
Considerable light was shed on the most w,"e'p,ead
d d ... phil0sophical
I eas an current problems of Pakistan's philo,ophe"
b [ in the papers Ine
memo e". 0 the PhiloSOphical Cong,e" 'ead al
P k the third !>ession. The
a Islam philosophers invited
whether in letter form or present our views on their papers,
hIe press, and it is with pleasure that
we s al now try to satisfy their request h
to their attention. ' oping that these lines come
Quite a few of tile papers b th . . _
the major problems o[ '0 . I I [y e Paklstam philosophers dealt with
cia I e and philo I
with the history of Islam a d sop ly. Many were concerned
n essence of the M r 1
the papers and speeches of th p' _ us 1m wor d outlook. But
e aklstanl sclloI h' .
sed the philosophical probtem [ ars at t IS sessIOn bypas.
- s 0 natUral SCien . h
stud of the first and second se . ce, t e salne may also be
I
SSlons. As one of Ih d I
() us, in Pakistan today natural . e e egales remarked
of the development of nature sCience and stUdy of the general laws
--- -- are stll! not re --. -
should, a fact which is bound I h celvmg the attention they
I I [ h
- 0 ave advers ff
sa e 0 P liosophical thought e e ects on the general
In the Country
The problems posed by the p k' , '
" a Istanl ph'l I
were viewed by them [rom th . _ 1 oSop lers at the session
h
e POsllions of'd '
p Ilosophy of Islam. A gOod I eahsm and the religious
example of th I
Renerai president of the seSSion M a was the speech of the
at the University of Karachi, on' Ih' ASlam, profeSsor o[ psy..:hology
Pe "Wh I h e Subject f "10
ace . a appened at one of 0 e Foundations of
OUr get-tO."h
ers with the Pakistani
Iro
I
"'hl'{b lurthf>r liRht on Prof. Aslam's Reneral ol.tlook. Prof
(ho drs s
I I on(> III ()llr piHty With a ("(,py of the (Juran, den
resen e( .
P [t With thr! words, "This IS my dlalectlcal m<ltefloJllsn:
[he RI
But we were In full agreement With Pro!. Asidlll Yo-1C:, he SdLli
,h.
subject of pCdce, while being mdLnly d talkIng point fo.;r
that . .
of state aud politiCians, could not be placed outSide the colflp<:tt'ncy 01
hllosophers and, broadly, of specialists in all branches (If the soc.ldl
P e' "The subject has assumed such urgency dnd imp<)tlilnce, nuS
SClenc .
become so larRe III scope and Significance," he decl,uerl. "that neMI)'
everybody--and rightly- feels called upon to deal with ii, .. , The pro-
lem of war and peace needs the combined wisdom of the phllo50pher
b. II"
and the social SCientist. It needs a great dea . e se. . _'
In his deliberations on the place of war3 In the history of mankInd,
Prof. Aslam unfortunately did not go into the the causes of wars, rooted
in the explOiting system of antagoniStic societies. Such analYSIS would
have clarified many things and explained why, for Instance, the
oeace plans of Rousseau, Bentham, Kant and the other great men
--;enlioned by the professor in his speech did not produre practical
results. h t t f
Prof. Aslam made some interesting observations on t e ac IVI y .0_
such peace-making institutions as the League of Nations and the
O
. Ion The "onclusion to be drawn from the work 01
Nations rgallisa I. " ff
. ,- h 'd' that "complete success mar yet be far 0 .
these LnstLtu\lons, e sal , IS be d bted"
But the fact that it is possible to succeed cannot ou .
"He man _Authors) is not going to be the unwept and un
( 'h I forces which his own curiosity has leI loose
sung victim of p YSlca 'th
P,o[, A,
lam, and we cannot but agree agalll WI
around him," said
him. _ nce to the work of the League of Nalions and the Unlt-
With rerere . ' p [ A lam noled ''The League I)f Ndtions V
N
- OrganisatiOn, TO. S' ,
ed at Ions h h moral inanily. The United :"lations may
may have dIsappeared t roug E' "
I as united as it should be.
seem to he no hat the League of Nations crumbled up because
We would add t f eace The Untied Nations is truly nOI as
it was a poor instrument 0 p .
'd . I should be.
ullite as I ent of peace supporters, who, he cor-
'
(In the movem , '
Commenlill I diversified walks of life and Ideologle.:,
Ihe mos
rectly noted, rep [ II on the peace plans of the groups that arc
d
eltmos
1oa
, h
Prof. Aslam vi h r religious creed. Here he outlllled I e
d O
ne or anot e . , ,
united aroun f a peace plan which, III his opinion. would suit
characteristiC features 0
followers of Islam. dered the problems of war and peace chieny
P
of Asian! consl "As wafS begin III the minds of men."
r . I standpOint.
from a psycholo!:lca d of men that the defences of peace must be
,', in the mLl1 s
he said, "it
101
,d
96,;
I
pIty
ces)
w
Hoc
,lam,
paki-
'"
ticJes
Ih.
other
<is/an
and
(istan
bllll!." In his new, hdS UllKh td COil!
of the problems of peace,
e
,',
Howe\'er, Prof. Aslam seemed rdlher pessiml tic himse I
(; JU
ho effectiveness of this means of malOtillllil1f,! the pe,lCe, for, b h pu
such knowledge of the problems of pC<lce ilS psychology l13s 10 lj
-, "will have instrumental \'dlue only-the \'dlue of d tool. W ill he to(
ever be used? is a question the psychologist hdS no means of
The use of a psychological or any other tool with which pcace Cdn be
achie\'ed depends on other men, men who wield great power In the
groups they lead ... ," To further the "science of Prof. Asl
am
suggested that ideological groups, rcligious and non-religious, all oVer
the world join forces alld set up an organisation whose tasks <mo nature
he described as follows: "" ,r would wish again and again to see this
organisation come into being through the goodwill and love of peace
of individual men and women and groups, who should volunteer both
their time and thcir money for the_ illtellectl!a[ treaynent of the problem
of peace, r do not believe that such individuals anri $uch groups cannOI
be fOund. If they cannot be found, then, alas!, our hopes for peace aT>!
doomed."
It is to be regretted that Prof. Aslam did not say anything in his
speech about the great role of the people in the struggle fa. peace and
did not analyse the recent international Situation from that stancipoint
The growing scope and strength of the peoples' movement for peace
and for the prOhibition of nuclear and other weapons 01 mass annihila.
tion, the aCtiVity of the World Peace Council, the fight the Soviet Union
and other peace-loving states have put up for peace have certainly
helped to relax international tenSIons, The signihcance of the peoples'
efforts to adVance the cause of peace and prevent war is enhanced
today by the eXistence of the World socialist system vis-d.-vis the world
capitalist system. In addition to Ihe SOcialist COunhies, many other
states are tdking a sland agaJllst war. Quite a few of the
once colonidl countries have now crealed their own 'iovereign states
Forces are sprinRing up flRht in the capitalist countries, leady to fight
for peace. Under these conditions, wars tire no longer H1evitable, and
can be prevented.
Prof. Govinda Chanddr Dev of Ih I . , o.
. . ' e oglc and metap lySI .....
section dt the thIrd seSSion of the Pdkistan Ph, h., C de
. I osop ICaollgress, rna .
the phdosophy of the future the Subject of h dd d
. -" IS a re$'S. Hc venture
the OpLnlon thai our alZe IS hOStilc to ,}hH . h'" ,.
.. asap Y an,] that 'Ln our
tImes phIlosophy IS generdlly taken to occuPY, bl d
II f
" a SI1M I Corner Tn a JI1
a cy 0 sCIence.
If he had in mllut modern POSItivism dnd th b . d
h
e pnnciples an concluSlOllS of t dt school, he WdS undOUbted I
. y TIght. But ProL Dev ignored the phIlosophy of dl<l.lectlcal materialism, h
Wile hOllollnng its
102
I
. IS lie lI'P'" tcdly :lsSured s in ollr tdk" 'l'iletiwf. Dia.
I
"C 1t 111\/e h r I Ihe
T{'pT.') "Sill the scientific ph lusop y ,) our lilies, I v-
C
I IIlllcrt. _. h., h
" me the basic shortcommgs of prevlOu, P IOSOp _
hirh h'-lS overco Id
sophy W I olatioll from life. the reflective Mlure of the 0
rms(llelrlS ..
i(al .e . "1. n, Ihe unscientific. spec.!!.lalive nature vf Id.eallsm.
h Slcal molena IS , .. .. . h
metap y . of s cUla!Lve as-against SClen!lhc_. It al>
the eXdltatlOllI.
t
. ::'e as all instrument of scientific k!lowledge as the
demonstrater 1 S v h h II the sciences of nature and society and
I I which runs t roug a f h
metlO( _. olent with the development 0 t ose
I f'comillg Tlcher In co h
is in turn ). . h h' h has accomplIshed the hlRhe;l synt eSls
-ences as the phLlosop y W IC
'" r 'f all the achievements of human thouRht. .
so ar 0 . f science <lnd philosophy I fi:1'1 the future
".. Tn d IIdPIlY marnage 0 bl I dust under the preJ;sure of
. " otherWise crum e m 0 [
of man who nllg I . TIl(! ulliun 0
' 1" II like the nudedf weapo .
deadly en!,!illes of destruc 10 tfer" the key to the future
" h Prof Dcv went on, 0 >
science <lnd phi osop y,. . Ike the birds and to SWIm
h '0 fly in the air I
of man "who kllows ow I -e on earth."
I h Ies but not how La I\' f
in water like tie s 1 , . I kong fOI He is looking or
d d what Prof Dev IS 00 I _ h ,
\Ve can un erstan . h "I"al wJt po I-
. I' k n's hig er Spl ... f
a
P
hilosophy that WIll m rna , 'a.k
L
' of the de\'elopment 0
d the practlca . d
tive scientific knowledge an Id h Iosophy wilh ils
II . f frolll the 0 p I _ _ r an
society, for Olle equa } ar sltlvists with their rejection 0
for science and rrom the modern PO" t we have found stich a phIlo ...
. . I We believe la
integrated phLiosop Iy. . . iCdl materialism- .
I t is dialectic,d dnd hrstor h said that th . I!reate"t
oJ> ly, I bly riRht when e . ed
Prof. Dev was unquestiona . s 'nthetic thlnkers_ He mt'nllon
. f the worl{1 were dIWdY' . would add to the roll
0 H el and others; v.e n whose
Aristotle, SplIlo/a, Kant, _e
g
Man:, Engels aud Lenr, h.
- of the w
e
'-
It
phllosoP r . hill synl e
the . I the fullest alld S( :entl I( h-' f r which Prof. Dev
ywrks reprf'scn I pment of phiIOSOP} ()
- tendency in the deve 0
tiC f the future will be cha-
called. Prof Dev, the philosohy 0 _ Ton or in words,
AccordiTlJ! to, . tellect and lIltm I ,
. its synthesis of: (1) m iritualism and (3) a mate-
raclensed by .. (2) mdleridlls
lll
and sp _ ht f this concepllon,
d religion, ]fe In the IIg 0
science illl . I"dlistic dttltude to I " "',oplliC<11 r<1: .. .Hul
. -\lid spIn... Iller 0 p II v !
rlalistlc < , clanly "I nun " ilnrl "nutler am
f) . 0 ". nse aUd reason f
Prof. e\- f]"ets between I gc and dlld or
analyse the coni -\ fOf reality IS Clan
t" nohnR tId Tty
Splfl , . i.Jblhty and durabl I ' articuldrly tned to make 111 hiS papel
leason, st . IS Prof. De
v
P and reason matter and
f the polll If between sense , h
One a . real gil . ratter chant:!e: synt eSls
tl ere IS no . s constancy, III , I
was that I of the SPlfl
l
I .. t us that reality is at one an(
spirit. The essenc:1I through Intultlo,ll t;a; iI is just as challRedble as It
dnd r{'dS d SplrLtlld
of sense olter;al <In
time m
the s.:Jllle
103
I
fved
J96':
)P/1Y
lces)
}W a
H"
;/om,
Pakl'
'h,
tides
Ih,
other
(iston
and
(is/an
, I II TI"s was the !E'llmotJ\' of plOf. I1P,,'i plllio ll'h\'
IS (IUdl(,.
"
I "'0 I,ave a true (II 1I',dll\' WI' 111\; I II
Meal{ In,t! y,
maller, but also materialise SPITJ! '
Prof. Dev's attempt to arrin" at tI dt'hlllll,)11 (II 1II.\"eol tlcn Itleod
from the r('fuled approach of Os\w,\ld's f'IH'r!::Hun M,IIIN, he \<IL I
"IS no olher than energy III different dlll'CtltlOS. Ilu Io...k II 1Uhst<l1l
lialion from modern sCIence, tiIlWIl \,tht'l tiUIlCS tiM! thu
theory of relativity "by welding togethl'r sp..In' tlilil Ilnll' 1< s I'lken
away the last vesllge of durabIlity in rndUl'1 If hlll(' is thl' IOUlih dllll(,ll.
sion of space as it IS made Qut, the st,lbl{' world of thing:i
becomes automatically reduced to an endless Chilill (If ,'\"t'llis Jlld
to be solid."
Prof. Dev's theory of knowledRe was Ilkln.! oll from
Bergson he stressed the limitations of sense dlld 1('{lSO/l <\/ld the /Iced
to believe in supra-logical intuition which' reldins III It the bnlliance of
both sense and reason minus Iheir defeels."
The efforts of Prof. Dev and other Pakistani philosophers tl,
reconcile science and religion, reason and faith had a very Mchalc rinj:1.
Paying homage to intuilion, Prof. Dev said, "in having objeCtivity, it
goes all the way with sense, in having neceSsity it goes all the way
with reason; but in having these two characters Simultaneously, it trans-
cends them bolh .... Inlellect and intuillon, reasoll and faith_ science
and religion, meet 10 their mutual Sd\tsfaclton and advantage."
\Ve have spoken here only of Ihe main trend of PIOr. Dev's papel;
it abounds in true and interesting ideas Qn which we cannot dwell here
for reasons of space. We shall Confine OUrselves to a few remarks on the
basic conceptions of the paper.
Prof. Dev draws no distincti:ln between metaphYSical materialism
and dialectical materialism. What he has to say about the exaggera-
tions of materialism, the ltmitations of sensory experience unrelated {o
reason, the one-Sidedness of Aristotle's logiC, and many other things is
perfectly t rue- but not of dialectical materialtsm. Dialectical ma terialism
achieves the highest union of sense, reason and experience, an. 1 is thus
able to resolve the conflicts which arise In Ihe COu rse of man's contacts
with the real world and which, as ProL Dev correctly notes, cannot be
resolved either by the old philosophies or by modern positivism. H must
be remembered that dialectical materialism does not see a Rulf between
matter and spirit. The Contrast between matter and Spirit, experience
and thought must not be exaggerated and made a metaphysical one.
Gnosiologically we do oppose matter to spirit and maleriailslll 10 ideal-
ism, and Ihis is essential-but only Within the limits of Ihp. basic philo.
sophical problem of what IS matter Or Spirit. Thoughl is a func.
tlon of the brain and the bram IS the highest prodUct of matter, and so
thought or spirit can no more be seDarated from matter Ihan they can
104
bt' [4 llifll
wit I I If! OPI
, , , I
:1114 I .It:.lor 01
Il uug
btlnj,"!' V onl!lry Iu l!' 'II I
Hut dl' fit r (' ,'px' I III 1
"
, .
plOoh=m 0'
j
2 Iy
,', j p.II ....t
"
orth
:JIIII or I t. I, I 1I1t0r. IIIP b Iwe n
ed 1 1 .
h IMU J b
I_mil m r: P )r'/flll
In II! 11 h )k LAmn like -f II x t:. ..
1111" 11111("11 II I tlnd Ille Jrm
11 dtl,.mphl II I ( ak I we'e l; \1(' CQ 14 :J Will
/I ,I. 1)1 II' ,hllolll(ll ' u ... /
c
T1ah,trI (lnd
IiIV!' .. I lIV lInn, Jk ... ...
bef. e h . 11spos.ra 01
I, II tl b e We
. I I ell m,dI'Udh'llI tI d I.pel d '" ;oap II tl .
did ('.' I " I" 'Ifl Ihal w (. eM Uv n ny r
E pwo - .f! to 1 J'dlt .In to
m I ,k,II" In'' II hi' pldl)${Jf ,I'. w Id
\\c .11(' 1111 a .., k 1 r .. w rl;1turl! bJI we wou
d pi cliall'ltlr II !lhlleTlailsfT ,n p y 10 to 1<3)". al Ilul
it II I With (;JI Jh.:, I
I k
" them 10 <1(''1
1
1<11111 1 Ie. - .j ........ nI5 W Ie our
I '- I 551' ns iT'!...... . !
h
nd Ind so lortdy ollr Illi(U, 1 '.<Inc H'l!- f,mJ!'Clr Will
d " Lmvt!'Slly, or n I ed
in the dlSulsslon tit Deiced _ h wou'l hud V hn2 aim !
the prinCiples of dldlettlC:al mtt?1 I SID I)e 1:1 _ t hail
as he d:d that till' IIPW phYS1CS 'b' the electron and )the, eleme'lary
broken up the atom. replaced II I d L Jt ow \hdt. frL] lee sldnd-
particles, and so on. Our .IS 0 fO
POint o( dialectical mdteflaillin. d ("hao cal roUena1;smj h I
( the 01 , me n l.S
(conlrary the posltlun 0 I "howed lh I I" ell" .ro. Iter
l"sm and Lenlf ed the claiJ1s hdt ma
I h dlom and expos I" I 10 deSignate all
inexhausltble as Ie. a philosophical conc p fleeted in It.
red Matter IS f the mind but re
had dlsappea . . Independently 0 _ . d merel,)re Ihe
. eahty eXlstlll endle. an I
- - ---- ells mallllestatious Me modern physICS mere Y
It IS lIlexhausllbt , d other pc1T11cles by I. It IS unlor.
h electron an _ I maler:a Ism
discovery of I e f of the truth of dldleclICd f lIowed .n the
offers additional prooOCiill sCiences programmes. and Lenir. flRure only
hat in the S \.1 x d nd
lunate t . I names "I . al - . . political leaders, a
schools of Paklstc1n t of economics and al> -slUn in our opinion.
I of Ihe s serious omll> .
as exponen s hers which is a h of Pakisl(ln, we can
PhllosoP h philosop ers . t
"ot once as ews of t e h 'eaq pretence a
. the VJ f rse Ie.
In characlensltlg I bal wlthoul. 0 cou . r hiS "Jews. The great
t nenllO
n
q, -anllOdllOn 0 h- I idea;;
hardly fail a I llost cursory ex 1 led his philosop Ica
anythi ng more Ihan .I Iqbal affll:l-'hO was often catled Ihe
I and philosopher I politJcal leader ed India 1\t the Round
Islam- He In 1932 :; out lhe InJ!an consti-
spiri tual falher 0 London conven
T bl
e Conference in . the world was created by
a he Quran. h bo-
. e ,,'as I led to God as I e em
lutlon. f depa
rtur
bal appea d h.s
baI's point 0 change. Iq of God he subordinate _ I
Iq d was In constant and 10 thiS Idea hs theory of bfe as action,
God, an Ie JUstICe, 1 of beIng, I
f supren hes
l
forn
diment 0 as the hlg JO,'i
theory of man
f\'cd
196:
nrc:;)
:.J\\f {1
11('[
slam,
Pakl-
Ih.
llclc.
,h,
olh('f
his/an
anJ
his/on
and his theory of socil't)' A("l"ordlllR to hUll. rllt' PI') f. I.H) """
he who could drdw rl('dr 10 (;od wllhuul ill'lI/.! dr.lwlI II 0 Iun IJu
rdlher drdwmg God illln IUIIIMII, Tht' hllllJdll ve lu (, II
plish this and come Ile,lr 10 Cud. till' Ir('('St hl'lII\! III ,III. The l.'h'lIll y
of life lies in contest. he SdIU . Ind cunlt'st Ihp In,bvlcill,(1 <H"hlt!.
yes immortality dnd ('ollquels SIM("l' ,U1(t hlllt'. lit' 100lIHilull'd m"llo
of the ideal sOcrety and Iht:' Ideal :-otdte dS Eqlhllity, Snliddlrly elll'l
Liberty. He opposed pri\'dte property, whidl Ul'dtl.'d "kIllRS dnd I)('R
gars"; everything belonged to (;01 and hence to s('{'Jety dnd thc
which were to be based on the prinCiples of til(' Qur,lIl, SUe'h was
Iqbal's basic social concept.
It is clear frOIll the above that Iqbal spoke from Idedlrstic philos!)ph.
real positions, there were !1lany redlrslic elements l!1
philosophy. He objected to mdteridlism. but did not Wrlgc the active
campaign againsl Marxism and Ihe Soviet system attribuled to him by
a section of Pakistan's press.
A clue to iqbal's ideas may !)e found in Ilis trilogy known as
Lenin, Angers Song and God's Command, in which the poet
expressed feelings of gratitude to the great leader. He says that after
death Lenin came face to face With the God he had refused 10 accept
in life; Lenin asked. "Where is the Man whose God Thou art? For the
East, gods are Ihe whites of Europe; for the West, gods fire shining
dollarsl" He turned to God with these words:
Thou art All Powerful and Just, but in Thy world
The lot of the hapless labourer IS very hard!
When will this boat of Capitalism be wrecked?
Thy world is waiting for Ihe Day of Reckoningl
Then the said to God:
o Painter Divine, Thy ilainlmg is still lacking III something.
LYlOg m ambush for mankind are the libertine
. the theologian, the find the monk:
In Thy Umverse the old order still continueth!
God found Lenin's words to be just, and commanded the angels
"to burn every ear of corn in the field, which is not used as food
for the cultivator", to the humble Sparrow strength to fight
the falcon," 10 smash the Rlass-blower's workshop" of modern
Civilisation.]
Iqbal's work, his poems In Urdu Parsee and P" b d
. "unJa I. awaIt our slu y.
We were presented WIth a colleclion of his WOrk, h hied
- w IC we have pac
in the custody of the InslLtule of PhilOsophy of th US S R {
. . e .... Academy 0
Sciences, where an lIltenslve stUdy is to be unde I k f . d
. " r a en 0 the lrfe an
aCtivity of thIS great man who loved his people '"d
.. extolled his home- land and its fighl for freedom.
I S. A Vdhid, Iqbal, His Art and Thoughl, p. 116.
106
"
",h ( 1
r It" {I JdIN .. ' I'"
(m lip f. II r
:) he fUi Jr C 'J!
w Jl til,: V
II up
III the
]1 ;r.
ron S WI'I]
de pt 'ldk , II nil III II J
n l' lin!.! I, we '" III (] Y F.:
rf' Ifl<Jl k WI l' n dRdlr.' OUt
of "II uh! r ut." e\"'n
teSI;>e 10/ ,.
(w t w f:It Y Ihc " 'I, h J tr.::lny
e Y' 11' taere II d( r..> I lPfl :)("
, JllfJ k Ot !.leo Oil), In JC. It.lny
"'h:.t drd n)1 .h re c. d p 111 JphlCdJ
e) r;YJI e' JIllI
It l!l flllr 11m h.;al W{ .l( eejc:J Ii f<.. :I;r IIltuest
Ihe Sdu,JMS III l'o:IkISI,I/. 10 ill Jee II :II dl d t tonc J I ;ate IIsm!t II dll
tire more .'!f,(tolYIIIl: rn thdl fOI ttl ::y :c )rs ..... e ptob rep'esenlell
their first chtl/lcl' II) helt Co ]Vlnp "'-Idr "'r.>OSltlOl 0'1 to IIr
firsl-htlrHI lOll! With &lvlet phllOi';h .(s. !>.i01 can r l':.! {Nerem.
phdSis(' the (nrc of the fa I, of :lUrse II the worle.: oJ
the nation which has hUiIt I. hsm <m.:i (lilted ,ur So ..- et stdte,
one of Ihe mdJnsldYS of wnho!! p)hcy respe t k . _ :J.>pendence
of other Stdtes tlnd other peoples, cam
on the pdt! of Pdklstan's intellrgcDiSlc..
t: ev)k. Ihe ke nest mtNi'sl
I - 10 , .... h)w uterested th9 It gdve our delegation great p ...
people of Pakistdn were In all aspects of Me :he s.., .. .el linlon. In
the economic dnd cuiturdl achie"cmenl5 of Ihe So. et people., d
ed lh the \\Cork of the PC!ld ..... "r. Punjdb dn V\e were acqudllli .... ,
Dacca Universilles. VISited the Unh'ersrly of Karachi and M'veral. rese
went 10 a number 01 .secondary schols, spoke at
arch IIlstilutes there.. h of the So"lel phllo,;ophers' delelZallon.
receptIOns organised In hers and :arious pllblic talked
were the $!uesls of professors. eacwhere,'er we .....em, whome\'er we met,
to people to all walks of Ide. and bout the Soviet people. their life.
e e desire 10 learn more a
we saw a SIllC r . f Iheir phlloso;>hy, of educa-
their factories and collectne arms.
U "erslty and so forth. h
lion, I\loscow nn, h I assured Ihey ..... ould cheris
' oodbye 10 us. our os s
On g Ih and we could fee! thdt their
f their meetllljZs WI us,
the memory 0 h IS They lold us about their impre,;.
, ht from their ear . d
words c,lllle strdl!! Iher Soviet scholar,; dnd artisls who ha
. eetlngs wllh 0 Ih I
SLons of therr m " I and asked us to pdSS on the messdge a
visited P,lkistan pre' IOUS y, not only to Karachi, but to other
Htlsls to come
they would like our, d th I they would welcome more frequent
I e - III Pakistan well an., d 10" The)' also asked us 10 transmit
CI I . S ,Ulu ae .
1 b)' SOviet mUSICian . kers dnd young people III the SO\'1el
VISI s . t <ifl "or , .
II
,
'
reClings to sncn I " k d things we would gladly quote If space
lei . other III
U
' " The)' s,ud "Mlly
mo", .
II I d. ddmlre RUSSIan muSic ;)nd lIlera.
perml ('(. r k -!dll lo\'(' dll
TI [>el1ple III d knoW Pushkin, Tolsloy. Dostoyevsky
Ie classical. They
ture, espeCiallY
107
J96:
rop/II'
'nccz)
'OW a
Her
fs/om,
Paki-
rho
,ticles
(h,
other
kistan
f and
) (lnd Gorky. We regret that they do lIot know contemporary SOVIet
writers as weI!.
The talk we had WIth members of the Inslttu\e ul fsidlTIu; Culture
made a particularly deep impression on liS. \\'l' WPre rordidlly receIved
by our venerable hosts. The iOIlR dISCUSSIon !hdt enSiled tllrned mdinly
on problems of religion and philosophy. We nllRht say that (here We
saw with our own eyes how freedoill-ioving. democratic idea!:. can becomE:
interlocked 1Il peculiar ways WIth reliRious concepts. But we were
convinced once agdin that differences in the outlOOk of the Peoples of
different countries with different SOCial, economic and political systems
do not rule out the POSSIbili t y of their working together for peace,
democ ratic institutions, and progress, dgainst war, colonialism and the
other ulcers of modern capilalist civilisa tion.
We were highly stimulated by our excursions to t he anCient cunu-
ral monuments of Pakistan, t he delightful old buildings of its towns, the
pictllresque and unexcelled Shalimar Gardens, the magnificent tomb
of Jahang;r in Lahore, the museums with their rare collections of
miniatures and ancient bronze and stone statues. We were sorry that
time was shorl and we could not more ,than a cursory view of
things.
But our most lasting impression will be that of the talented and
industrious Pakistan people, all of whose deeds and thoughts bespeak
an insatiable desire for freedom, and just pride in thei r count ry and its
newly-gained independence. The people of Pakistan, like people all over
the world, want to live in peace With other nations
o
They are working
hard to consolidate the sovereignty and independence of their mother-
land and remove all obstacles in the way of its economic and cultural
advancement.
The Soviet people share the desire of the people of Pakistan a nd
other countries for peace, freedom and a happy li fe.
The Visit of aUf small group of Soviet philosophers to Pakistan, OUi"
partiCipation in the third seSsion of the Pakistan Ph' l h' I C
I asap ICi! (lDgress,
and our personal contacts with many '"P,"sentat r h t '
Ives a t e coun ry s
intellectual life offer convincing proof of the user I r h h
u ness a suc exc an-
ges and show how instructive rneell ngs belween ' 'II
. - SC.lentlsts and Inle ec-
luals of different countnes can indeed be Des t
- .. . PI e serious differences
and sometimes even Irreconcilable Contradiclions I k h
. - . -. In out oo', the exc an-
Res of opiniOn and ltvely diSCUSSions broaden th ' , d
. , en viewpoints an
ennch all those who take purt III the get-together< U II
... Sua y aside from
differences, there is also some commOn grOund wh '
ere all participants
in the international scientific forums can meet and
h P k
' t ' I get close. We nre
glad to note that all tea ani s and "nl II I
t: c.: uals whom it
J08
,lle . ui UI" tIl meet He oncerned, hke the Soviet people, With
0 111 .
II" m I)f thp lie/II e-fo.ll (oex ... Ience of nalions, SOCltll and
lilt' pr
o
) .- .
U ll nIPrrupt(>'i e (Jnr,mtr and cultural development.
stead y, '
.1\.1.E. Omelyano\O;ky, I.M. Muminov,
K.r-f. Froio\'
Reor n.e:) Voprosy
("Prob;erns of pi losophy" No 6, I(J5ti
Fourth Session
The fourth sesSIOn of the Paki!.!an Philr50phical Cungret .. look place
F h ry 15 tl, 17 1957 III the city of OdCCd. Edst Pakistan.
from e rua . , . SA
It was attended by scholars from the U.S.S.R. IndJa. the U. . .,
C d Egypt and other countries. In addition to ph'loc;ophers, there
ana a, . loo'sts historians. Pakist.:mi UllJ-
were also many SOCIO b
l
, . . _ I" _ t!
h d
epresentatives of various sCientIfic, re Iglous an
verslty teac ers an f
other organisations. . f ther countfles, ourselves mclu-
All the delegates and VISitors rom a t of the Congress Prof.
I ceived by the secre ary .
ded, were warm Y re M Sharif, president of the Congress. paid us
G. Ch. Dev. He and Prof. M .. l. elin us as dear guests ",nd VOlshtng
a visit the very day we arnved, gre g
us success and well-being. b,ects. (I) The Nature of
s devoted to two su .
The fourth session wa . h It a- marked by great
, d (2) Reason and Fait. w " ,
SOCial Dynanll
cs
an The plenary meetings, symposia
activity on the par t of the delegates II' 'tended. Aside from their parti
t
' gs were we a .
d ot her section mee tn I d n Soviet alld AmerIcan
an tngs the n la .
"pation in the Congress mee I . h _ fellow delegates and ill\'lted
bl- lectures for t elr . nd
delegates gave pu IC d t dents of the univers':les a
ests and also for the faculty an s u
gu, h I k 'pubhc
other higher sc 00 s. _ of wide circles of Pa Istan s
The session focused the attentlon
t
b' the intelhgentsia and student
d
th keen lnteres )'
d was foilowe WI
an d ng from the Ouran and an
Youth . fler a rea I . r J
. UniverSity, a _ h'n'ellor the Chle us-
At the Dacca -t 's vlce-c "... .
h by the univerSI Y d the fourth session open.
, gural speec h d pronounce I
mau Amin A rna , r the presidium aO(
f EllSl Pakistan, the members 0
lice 0' were presented W . ev took the floor to introduce
Rower garlands -d nt Prof. Shant. Prof. D h made short speeches.
ess pre,,1 e , nd they eac
the Cong
r
visitors, a 'u n the delegate from
. d legates.. Soviet mo.
the foreign e hllosophef:oi of the ., work and expressed con-
lf of the p ceSS 111 I 5
On beha d the session sue ,hilosophiCdl problems by
S R wl"he f curren p
the U.s. ' -OInt discussions 0 ould cultural lie.s betwee,l
fidence that J " lit coUtllneS YI understanding and coope-
f om c\w
ere
. promote III
scholars r those countries, 109
the peoples of
eived
J96,:
soph}'
10W 0
He<
Islam,
Poki-
s the
I,/ides
1 the
, other
i1 and
. . ,d",neillg /l/lilosophicdi thought, and contrrbute to the 0," ratIon III "
raj mo\"emenl for world peace.
AK. Brohi, who presided at the fourth session, gave il talk, and he
was followed by the president of the Pakistall PhIlosophical Congress
M.M. Sharif.
The speakers at the sympoSium on reason and faith were Athar
Rasheed, principal of the Government College (Quelta). Kazimllddin
Ahmad, professor of the department of philOSOphy and PSYchOlogy
at Dacca University, Prof. AbdUl Qayyum of the Islamia College
(Peshawar). and M. Hye, principal of Ihe Rajshahl Government
College.
At the symposium on the nature of SOCial dynamics, the speakers
were Prof. KG. Newman of the Dacca University politIcal SCience depart_
ment, Dr. S.M,H. Zaidi of K<lrachi UniverSity, B.A. Dar of the Institute
of isl<lmic Culture (Lahore), PrOf. K.M. Jamil, head of the department
of philosophy at the University of Rajshahi, and Prof. Fazlur Rahman 01
the department of philOSOphy of the Sind MUSlim Col1eg
e
(I(drachi/,
preSident of the Congress section on the philOSOPhy of religioll.
The follOWing lectures were delivered before largE' dlldlences of
guests, university profeSsors and stUdents: Prof. Goheen of Sldnford
University in the United SllItes, Oil the Philosophy of History; Prof.
v.F. Berestnev of the U.S.S.R. Academy of SCiences Institule of Philo.
sophy all the MaVin!? Forces of SOCial Development; the indian dele.
Rdtes, Oil the of PhilOSOphy and The Ind;\':dual and CUlture.
Th, So"" d",.", "'0 P"'''''d , P'pe, "DeI',"'ini,m 'nd Te/,%_
gy", prePdred for the Congress by Prof. T. I. Olzerman of Moscow UniverSIty.
/, Ih, I"P'" 01 Ihe P,'''''"' Philo,oPh,,,, 'oCi" philo,ophy,
meld physics and the PhilOSOPhy of reliRion were viewed
/'om U" pO",ho,,, 0/ .d"h"n ".d Ih, "h,.oo, phUo,ophy 01
It is genC'r<lliy known that 11\ counlries like Indonesld dud i'akistdn
Ih, ideology 01 /"'m h" fo, '/nil, lo,g ho" 'ow pJ'Y'd _ di"mol
m/, in U" mov'''',,1 ""'''1 oolO,i'lis
m
ood fo, n",o,,,, eqo./,Iy "d
so"''',nly, .nd Ih'l " " st,1I "'y impon,OI m Ihe 1,/, of U,"" cOUlitries.
Th, P>edom"""" of ""' ideology hos """y "Ooe''''d Ih'
de",op,,,,,, 01 II" 'P",'"" hI, 0/ P""loo, 'I, ph,'o,oph",/ ""nee
included.
In his Pdpe>r On the slale and taSks of philos
o
h A K B I
P y, .. ro II, presl-
(h'lIl of tilE' fOurth session ot Ihe Pakistan hi' d
. ""-'P Ica Congress, VOIce
the OpInion Ihdl pllJlosOphy had relinqUiShed Its I
. . . OrmCr role as d source
(,f Wisdom alld humdllll'lrlalllsm, that it had (0 f .
r elted lis m{Juence JII
fhe modern wOlld and ceased to be lhe /
r a mankmd. instead,
1/('
s'"ience teaching peuple the me<1nm!? alld
an dcaclellllc ...
I become
It
ha
{ I IIOOy
f concep s. I this condition of phtlosop ly a ,
use a f the reasons or .. _.,
spe,k,ng d eenlu"" h,d be" ,mo" \
" "id Ih" Ihe p,eee mg I /'ith wh,,,,, 00' "OIo,y w" ""kly J
Bro,,' lIas centuries 0 , ked
tilers by Car Y e, of scepticism and atheism, au age mar
k,owledged 1o be " m,ti,m ,"d ,mp"""m Ph,'"ophy h,d
a the wide spread of p g nd been divided up into dlflerent
," ""hly "d .":::eom',nolo,,, 1o, .. , "e. To be '"'"
h s epistemology, P h of the science 01 ph.Josop y
branc of these Important branc t continued Brohl, one could
a measure of of vital syntheSIS. The task
help regreHing vitality and give it back its proper
a restore pula
noW was f
'0
1, played in tile history a
place. descnbe the Man
A K Brohl went on to Hegel, and, finally, James. .
. . Kant, Fichte, Schelling, set Ihe hmlts <)f human
philosophy by d bled to Kant for havmg ""'SSIn" phase
d was III e . cd as a mere,..... ,.
kind, he sal, h agnosticism Kant defln W ht If mdn wanted 10
knowledge. Bul I e I veiopment of human to break down
'" Ih, hi,,",y 01 I" Ih, wo"" )
reach a higher leve. sent consciousness. WI. f'ce on which
the elose bounds of hiS pre the only plane of expe'lc.;hieve a new
I knowledge as Id have 10 0 1/'
of conceptua . Philosophy wou d I
'o",,ousness can function. . nd reenerdte dn
d ,pint, a ..
/
'
eason dn . n"c
,y
nthesis 0 Id of exoene" \
p the war .
accordingly. h us how to h\?hl u ut of Ihe m,lfal and
Philosophy nHist teac . d 11ft manklll_d 0 hy be Ihe
of the Splrtt - l<1psed. Phllosop Now WtlS Ihe
with the rays . which It has 1 f the spin\.
intellectual decline 1Il10
d
b rth into the worl( further l>Jlinludt evolu.
's secon I of mcln s
midwife of man de an instrum
enl
time for It to be ma s Sacidt Dynamics: po:a.
an's IXiper wa I problem ilS 11e
tion. f KG Newm !I sldte<1 1 s f SOCI. The
t tie of Pro. .. Slate anc I the matst 0
1 in the ' tahilily In the
EqUllibTlU/ll stltulionaJ S of past history,
rities and I and con. hort survey A,,-. tolle had onl.e h l
or poJltlca hiS s I I,) and., II.
searc From h t what P a hIe 10 eXIst WI . "'Y
dynalllic forces. on I d t being a
w the conelusl sociely no. cooper<llion III
speaker dre the stale and harmonIOus for Ihe pres.
postulated aboul t sses and and Irue
out functional. c a ace was stl f IIbelt)' alll:
f SOCial pe h concepts 0
interests 0 dVi.lnced t.. e_ . .. r cedom dill.!
. Ilad d - .. [ fralernlty. I
ent day. Revolullon concept 0 . . opmion, and so It F
ench 10 Ihe h s.uu.;:er S I"
The r _" Ihem s \"e In Ie H )htl('s conSI( ....
nd W..... exclu I, Ihe two. Thomas , equality a nutuaJlY reconCllc
. were I Iy 10 III equahty fra
1eTlll
devolved upon
I
I
eived
196,;
:;op/ty
0
H"
(s(am,
Paki
the
II/ides
I /lle
I other
lkis/an
I and
'kistan
\
I
\
h
n'y JanguaRe the passions heeded. huw{'ver. fhe trldll", ...
red [orce leo .. '"
I
Iy and fraternity Ihercfor(> Ildd 10 be SIIPport(>(j by
of liberty, equa J
force and made a rectangle.
After examining various forms of government (mondrchy, oliRarC'hy,
) P,o
f Newman concluded Ihat the most desirable Irom th!:
democracy, .
standpoint of the satisfaction of all human ne.eJs and the stability 01
I was a
"'onslitulional government combllllng dll fOur
socle y ... '.
The true art of successful government was hndinR a dynamic equihbriunt
in Ihe gn.'en sitUation at the given time.
Prof. Newman's attempt to outline the foundatLons oi SOCial
dynamics wenl no further than general <ibstractions. There was practl.
cally no analYSis of concrete forms of government rUle. The general
tendency was to Justify modern class relations in it.e covntnes
and bourgeOis democracy, the latter being allegedly capable of enSUring
the stability of the state and social progress by mailltalning <In equili.
brium of Social forces.
Prof. Goheen of the United States brought an idealistic apprOach
to Ule subject of the philosophy of history. The speaker beRan by
that the problems of the philosophy of hislory, Very important and com-
plicated problems today, were being elaborated in tile of Toynbee\
historical and Sociological conception. HisloTlcal events were
interpreted by different philosophers ant'! only the futurp could say
which of their appraisals was correcl. H:storical knowledge was there-
fore rather relative.
Prof. Goheen's efforls to analyse the problems of the philOSOphy of
history laid bare the inability of modern idealism 10 explain the laws
of histoncal development. That -idealism rests on the poslti(..n of sociolo-
gical agnosticism and denies the Very POSSibility of knOWing and usinJ;!
the objective laws of SOcial development.
Many of the papers and speeches of the delegates were inspired
by the Ideas of modern neo-Freudianism, POsi tivism (Ind other trends of
Subjective Idealism.
The philOSOphy of religion and philol;Ophy of Isltlm Were !,!'iven a
bi.'! place in the deliberations. The paper "PhilOSOphy and Religion" by
Dr. K.M. JamB proceeded from the idealistic premise that philosophy
and reliji1ion were not distinctly differentiated Ilelds. In the opinion of
Dr. Jamil, modern science tended increaSingly to admit the existence of
fields of knowledge lying beyond the reach of SCience, whereas pOi-
\osophy did not countenance that View. Speaking of SCientists who tned
so hard 10 mterpret religiOUS expenence in close connection with physi.
cal and SOcial realities, Dr. Jami\ Said that the intereSI of in
"".,on was .,vmg n,w hop, 1o tho" who wanl," 1o ,man"pa"
hum,mly ['om Ih, "owmg mnu,n" 0' mat'''a''sm. Enoou".Od by Ih,
,d"'''I" oondus<ons o[ ""'m ""nl"Is, oono'u"ons wh"h '" pow".
fI2
, ,HolJ\ems of SCience, Dr. Jamil voiced the hope Jilin the new ..
lesS to cxp ledo to dn olliance of philosophy and rehf/lon. .
",I this would " Ihe fanaltcilim, intolerance and persecution
U' I condemneu _ h
Dr Jaml the Middle He asserted th.t Muslim philosop ers
f sCientists In then. to explain the nature of the real 'Worlel.
done morc thdn .dn,y 01 Muslim philoiophy on Europe
. t was precise y .
lind that I h s irit of rlltionaitsm there.
that had bolstered t e t: s ak of the role and signrficance of fslamlc
He then :--ent on !led ':e sole and unique road to true knowledge.
mysticism, which he cia, was regarded by Pakistani philosophers not
'nl,d out that s am as a sort of uO\versal
He pOI h'l hy but more
,
"y as a religious p I asop , 'Ihe social political and spiritual
m' g all aspects 0 , ..
I encolllpasslll . f 11 human acltvlty.
:,g;od"y-,: ,o"o'ogisls,
The great ac IVI . I ed in their efforts to sprea _ _ I
.. h'storians have dlsp ay .t special attention. Sovle
the ideology of Islam :re engaged in the study
of an d Orientahsts-w a nt them.
philosophy and its
of the developmen 'th the key points of that I 'th popula-
selves WI . Ie in countries WI ,
status and ItS fO h
contemporary d paper entilled "On I e
tions. V F Berestne
v
rea a _ d-ffered tn its
Soviet philosopher .. I" Although It I -t
SOCial Developmen. fundamental problems I
MOVing Forces of. I position and tn, other delegatES, the So",.pe".:
underlying ideologlca and speeches 0 per respect for
po
sed. from the papers d rnterest and pro
'th profoun en
was received WI . I delegiltes were glv
'fi achievements. sian the Sovle ,-'lolars, heads oi
scienh c . d after the ses
th
Pakistan: '- f
Both dunng an I and conler WI d other 0
Iy to mee tudents an
the opportum bl"shments, s f
. educational esla I. Sharif. President 0
h,gh" Iry's ;nl.Jligoo"" ,," wah ",of. M. hi/osophi",1 "i.n"
the coun of our long the state 0 P need to
In the highlighted Soviet
Ihe Pakistan its prospeclS, wehilOsoPhers of Pakistan haed the highest
in Pakistan an !acts between the hers of Pakistan allac
al
delegation in
slrengthen coSnharif said Ihe phil:
r
ihe Soviet contacts, which
- Prof. . -patlon ed that sUU'
Union. he parltci . ns and urg . hbouring coun-
importance to I Congress philosophers of nelg
k of Ihe b tween
the wor peratiO
n
e t were greatly Inte.
promoted COO lhened. the scholars of PaklS an lves wllh the state
tries, be noted thatwlshed to acquaml U.S.S.R. They also
Prof. u.s 5 R. higher education \,IOSOPhY, Islam, and
rested LIl t IS of sCIence ut our study of Ara P
and prospe<: VI more abO
wanted to kno 11:3
so on.
,
r
t 196,:
/SOP/If
now a
. Her
Islam,
Pakl-
IS the
urlicles
n the
:l a/her
'akislan
51 and
akislan
We found Ollr informal talks 'nth schoi..us IIld I<hull'ltl; Ill.:hlv
1l1uffiinatmg. Through them we had thc oppurtunity to 'I, re JI v.",.
on problems of Uleory; Ihey gave us d bC'tter idt'd 01 he Ih?\'t. rln.l!n.
of philosophy dnu theory as well as the conuiti('lfls lor SClen'l,lf work
in Paklstan. dnd its progress in the fields of publi<' edll< ,illlln hlNdturl
art, elc.
After the session in Dacca, we went to I...lhoH' to oh!.\'!vl' the Sy.
stem of teacher and student training at the university <lntl thl' 1(,<lChlnl.:
of philosophy and olher subjects there. \\-e hdd mdlly \\'1Ih the
members of Ih! philosophy fdC'ulties of Lahore Unin'fSitr dlld Ihe (IQv.
emment College; on one occasion we \'ll'WS on vctriou$
problems of philosophy, psychology, logic, and so on. Uur hOSt5 ex.
pressed Rred! inlerest in the study of the history of philosophy under
way in the U,S.S.R., especia!ly the history of Arab philosophy, dnd dlso
the study of psychology, Pavlov's ideas, our teachillj.! of 10,(1i(', etc. We
were told that the university programme for the Sludy of
now included a course students with Ihe founddlions of di.
alectlcal materialism-alon-g: with the other philosophical systems.
\Ve answered many questions, from the faculty members dnd also
from the sludents, about the Soviet system of sClenlJhc and
personnel. the problems on which Soviet philosopher,. were
working, psychology, SOCIOlogy, logic in the Soviet UnIOn. elc_
Great interest was expressed 10 the status of sCIentists and teachers
10 the U.S.S.R., the organisation elf their scientific and 50("ial activities,
their material POSItion, their teaching and research loads, etc.
It was our pleasure to meet with SCientists, sludents and journalists
in Pakistan. We must say that these sections of the intelligentsia play
an important role in Pakistan's social life and exerl a Rleal mOuence 011
other sections of the POpulation. The country's young
a high degree of SOCial and political activity. This is particularly
t rue of the students of East Pakistan, who are taking part In the strug-
gle for Ihe uemoCralisation of their country, the improvement of the
people's liVing conditions, in the siruggle for peace.
We would be remiss if we did not aCknowledge the interest the
Pakistani scholars and heads of the Philosophical Congress showed in
the Soviet delegation and the soliCitude and Courtesy With which they
surrounded us ali during our stay in Dacca and Lahore
The main conclUSion to which this Summary of ;he work of the
fourth session and our actiVity there POints is Ihat OUr visit and parti-
Ci]}atlOn in thai session were undoubtedly useful As ",. I Ih
, y
ened our ties With the philosophers of and'i I I d h
.. u SO nl 1.1 dn I e
other counlries represented at the session Particul"ly
. Important was
the of contacts with students of the Phil0SO h (I I .
So h , Pyo sam,
wil! help viet sc olars to arnve at a deeper an I I .
-. . ( C oser acqualll-
tann WIth thf' role, influence and evolution of this ideolo I
gy, so popu ar
1/1
II
,I th,.
"
,
,
I !, PI .p
,I ,.
h. I
,
" >
II Po> .,
'" "
he J.rab
"
" .
., h
It'
'I
h. n
,
k h
"
,
,
,,'
I , hil
,
V
,
11, h' (
, ,
, .
"
lUi .t ud y h' h
P'
I_ tors
l<,VC1nOIl ...
of IIIl" t h.VI' 14 LJI (I III he \1('''.
TIlt' ("Oil WI" t jllHosop f'
[1l( rlLcllldll()1l "
,n Iulun' IIlluh 10 I)(' L(!S ,,,et 'me
I the t nRre r r.' 1 I
(l , _I 11 lIldwtc, 1)111"111,\1151 51' 1
to IOU' ,
p
n
I
r.
,
1 Or'cn 11
I
,
-"
"0
, ", 01
Buddhism, I'te I, ,
, L('hIPVJlI)! dose( re a I( s
11111 itlC'l,)[s ,11 , I P', tabu ndld.
Im[>01 ' I ' I" frorn the 'hol.ns I) dr> s
"'PI11(-'l1t 0 VISI., R I trip'
are the t'U("OIlTtI" I . s f till' Edst) 10 till' ! S
. , I otill'r {'(lun riC 0 . nt! so oogisls
Indonesld dnl h ' sludents )f I"w e,f the
by Soviet phl\osoP, us, ol:
her
countries, od the c. .!On
to Pakistan, IJl(ild dnd f blications betwe. n the ..., 11.
systematic exchange 0 pu V_ F. /krcsln('v
VOPIOl,
R! p. tl J fro:n
ill iO/ii, X . 1957
Eighth Session hi al Congre5$ met in
f Ihe Pakistan Phllosop , " epresented
The eighth session 0 l.j 1961. The roreif:n Germany
J ary 11 to ' .\ R Indld \\ e",
Karachi from anu he U.s,S.R., U.s.A. U ... '.'ion' stood out from
by delegates included t d the Lebanon. ThIs sO;' , respect to the
F e Ceylon an II -n Pakistan III ,
Belgium, ranc, annua Y I, 'der publicity gl-
--ons coov ... , d and Ihe w
the preVious sessl 'Is it attracte
f parllc1pan .
g
reater munber 0 me four sectlOns
I e country. ed monj2 the S<I .' .
ven it inside t I ssion WdS diVid a . hilosophy and
The work of the se ie and meldphYSICS, P 1llere were two ge-
as in preViOUS years: mordls dnd and the methodo-
psychology an.! educ,1 of the llallOna
roblems 'bT ty
I symposia on P ,reat respenSI 1 I
nera h idea that a ,_ the
logy of psychology. essioo was I e ormous discovenes III
of the s 'mes of en _ of the
The keynote . in our lIn the countnes
devolves upon social said Dr. B. A.
natural sciences back. the Wh,e;':raChi. in his speech of
"\loJe canno ily 0 h d been no a va
world h Univers 'f there d k
cannot work Ie<hnology and space roc
10 the delegates. 'I revolution, no def of things,"
science, no Ihe Stdg
n3tcd
or 1/5
elry, no diSS01u I
S'
ceived
n 196;
osop/!}'
now 0
. Hcr
Is/am,
/ Pnki-
i5 the
o,tJC:/Cs
In the
d other
'okiston
61 ofl;l
'okistofl
On Ih(' who/p, COlllempOr,Ii'Y 1\,kisl,rlU philosophy II d1d:ctdt'fI< -rl
hy Ib lueulistic, religIOus IsldmiC' Ir('ud orll'Il!('d 011 SUnh' 01 lh,. 10[(,.
most phi!().<;ophical idealists of th(' We ...1. TIu' P.lkiSI,1I11 pllJlnsopht'[s U,"_
sldnlly referred to Henri Bergson, S.ulluel Alt'XMldt'r. John D('w(.y,
\\',!1idm Jdmes, Alfred \\'hltehcdd, Bt'rtfdlHI Russ('!i <llId uther \'\"':;I.'fl1
scholars. AccordIng 10 some 01 the spedkt'ls, Ill{' P,lllWlh 0/ Ilhlh'T!dh. 'n
was INdiO!? to mOTdl and spmllldJ <lnurdlY. As uPr>os('d It I Illdl
t
'
r
i<i
ils
nl.
the}' ('dlled for dn alliance of pllllo!'iophy dlld sCil'n('(', With
re:nforced by a ralional <In:! prdRllldh: philosophr <J
leading roJe in Ihls alliance.
But life ROes ahead, and desplIe the overill! idedlist trend, the CiJ,!hlh
session, IJke the seVenth before it (which the ,HI thor of these lines
also attended). showed Ihat elemerHs of materialism were 10
ilp}X':dr sometimes inadvertently, at other tImes deliberately, in tlle work
of the Pdkistani scholars, especially the younger ones. One of the
speaker:; mucle the progressive point, for instance, thut religious, biola.
RiC<.ll, racial and language factors could not be conSidered decisive to
the formation of national character. Durmg the dISCUSSions on the
methodology of psychology there was conSIderable Criticism of the
premises of logical POsitivism and Freudianism, which many of the Pa.
kistdni scholars judged to be groundless and of little Use to the science
of psychology.
On the o:her hand, both they and their at the ses.
lOlon stressed the importance of I. P. Pavlov's contributions to psycho-
logy.
The leaning towards progressive modern philOSophical thought
was also felt in the Way the speeches of the SoViet SchOlars were reo
celved. Whether the subject was national chdracter, changes in the so-
Cla.! of the U.S.S.R., the development of PSychology in the
U.S,S,R., or OUr Work in the field of Oriental philOsophy, Our papers in.
vafldbly drew large and nl t d
I eres e audIences and innumerable questions
from the floar.
Our tdlks with the prominent P<1klStalli philosophers M M Sharif
M. lii.Jmlduddm, G. Ch. Dev, F. Rahman S Z Ch dl " ,
h " , .. au HII)' and other
('nfle ed Our l/lSlght into mOdern Pakistan PhilOSOPhy Many schola r ..
expressed reJ,!rets that so few So h' '
able III translar h Viet p Jiosophicat Works were avail-
AI! th . Ion, ampenng acquaintance with them.
er e seSSIOn, the SOViet delegates y V S
(JdnY<lOts dnd yOur auth . . . . horokhoviI, M. T. Ste.
' or VISIted the towns f Lah h
where they dlso p"''''"ted 0 ore and Pes awar,
papers.
Reprlllted from
v. S. Scmyonov
Veslnlk AN 5SSR
("BUlletin of the U.S.S.R. Academy of
SCiences"), No.5, J 96J
Fifteenfh SeSSion
Th .. h'II-cull! ,IIIIIUdl (If thl! Jlulustdn Phl106llphiCdI COIIRrt'!S
111I't JI tilt! IInn'Nltlty flf I(dl!lhd/Ji III MdY J')fjfJ. This Wd!:i illtP.II'
dl"J hy d :"10VII:>1 d .. II"bltlon (If lire: 't v (" nklJ'.sky. Y \' SliM").
khoViJ ,Inll A F KfHOtJkfJV.
III thl' c/Juir ,11 ttw fifh ..../llh /ifOSSlfm Sdt the womdll prt'SJ(Jenc
Akhldf Imam, Jln,fl.'SSfJr of phllf)s()phy at Ihe- Unlver:;lty of Dacca. The
dlstJllRuishpd f.IJ/OPUlly fll Pdkist4ni phllos(iph(!'rs dud scholars who took
part in Its work includp.d Dr, M, Ahmed, Pres;dent of the Palustan Phi.
10sophic,1I tlnd professors (JaIl .\1, \1. Abdul Hye
and C. A. Qddir.
In addLtion to the symposIa on "The Philosophical Basis of the
Ideology of Pakiswn" and "The Concept of Person in Contemporary
Thought", there were also Ihe meetings of the sections on logic and
metaphYSiCS, psychology and ethiCdI and SOCIal philosophy
and the philosophy of religion.
The predominant place given !o the problem of the
basis of the ideology of Pakistan was to be explained by the deme
of official government dIld philosophical circles to prove that the state
unily of the divisions of Pakistan, inhabited or peoples of dlnenng
national, ethnic and linguistic affiliations, hinged on a common Ideolo-
gy, The discussion of Ihis problem was oot WIthout I!S pracllcal Impll.
cations, considering the evidence of separatist tendenCIes both J/l West
and in East Pakistan.
, declared Islam the biJsis of this The speakers at the symposium .
. I f r PakiStan and the best SULted religion for It.
common Ideo ogy 0 h hi d t to
'b d that the vital core of Islam t al ('noll e I 8 H SiddIqi 0 serve , r
" d I ' I role was a monotheism radically d,stinct rom erform its I eo oglca, . . ,
Ph' of such religions as Christianity of Judaism. none
the monot elsm ,. A Ih
b 'I I ned with social reform movemen.s. no _ h I h d ever een I( en I I .. .
of w IC I a f Islam in his view was its assocIatIon With
er distinguishing feature o. I and eoon;mic Justice. B. H. Siddiqi
'd r humanism i:QCld 0
the L eas 0 , ._ t that a close bond existed between Islam
d took to demonsu a e d
o.lso un er . Ih t the SOCial Justice and humanism espouse
d
mmumsm, except a
an co the eternal laws of the Ouran.
I had to rest on d th I
by Is am d there were many speakers who argue 11
h other han , ..
On len had assumed in Pakist<l!l ,today It could not sene
in the form Islal e the ideologiC<.l1 basis of the stale, It would
' I Y To becorn
Y
et as an Ideo og. 'a 10rm comprehenSible to the people and Its
esented III ..
have to be pr . tep with modern SCientific and techntcal pro.
. brought JIlto s
1ynamLsm
g
r('ss. , I., mission assIgned to Islam, many speakers
f the sLng
u
. .
In view 0 f their way to defend It agalllst the thrusts of
' went out 0 h
!It the sesSIOn he .keynote of the papers presented at I e sym.
. This wdS I
llateriallsm.
117
:eived
196:
Isophy
enccs)
now 0
. Hc!
Islam,
Paki
s the
!Jrlic/CS
n the
J othc!
akisfan
Hand
akistan
po..llUll (>11 'ThE> Cuncept of III Cl>1l1l-'mpnlM), Ih", 10
,hdrdctefJslll' \1(.'1Il)! ProL Inhllll'S lOtrodllclmy p,'I'('f I WlllC 1 hl' )1 "!h\
10 IH(lH' lh'" rooson or COIlSCIOllSllt'SS CdrHIO\ he ('\pl It' I )y lh,' n
tUfdl SLWIlC{,S and Cdn only he Ull(\l'rstoo.1 hOIll tht' st,lldPOlllt )f fl'
II!:!ious dOl!mas an approd'l, she did not bdrk up wtlh Illl)" so It'IIILIJ(
arRumenls. by the way_
DUrlUg the .!;essioll the members 01 Ihl' SO\'!('! dl'le\!.IIItIll I,,,k p
,Ht
in Ihe discussions of the P<lpers and spel.'Chcs ,md dlso lurthNl'd till'if
contacts with the scholar!' ..... ho hdd COIllt' to R<lJsh<lh: from tllffPH'nl
parIs of Pakistan. Eadl of the Soviet delcQat('s Rd\'(' d llullllwr of puillic
lectures in Rajshahi dnd Dacca.
.,- r !\(\frbko\
Repnnted flom Voprosy liIosOUi,
No.9, 1968
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Marx K" EnRt'ls E, "Mdndf!'iln of the ':':()mmUnls! Party" Sclrctrd
Works in Two Volumes, vol. I. Moscow. 1958.
:Vlarx K., "Moralizuuyushchaya knLka moral",
K. Marx dncl F Engeb, ColirCIf'd Work .. [21 d Ed.). vol. 4. Mos.
cow, 1955.
Marx K., "Doklad generalnor;:o soveta 0 prave nasledovaniya", K. Marx
and F. Engels, Coliectcd Works, vol. 16, 1960.
Engels E, "Yuridichesky sotsialism", K. Marx and F. Engels, Collec/ed
Works, vol. 21, Moscow, 1961.
Engels F.. "Spf>cial IntroductIOn '0 the Enl!!lsh Edt;o:: (.! So-.db.)
Utopian dnd $cicnti hc''', K and F. Engels. Selected Works
in Two Volumes, vol. 2. P!:"iH
Engels E, Engels to C. Schmidt, October 27, 1890, K Marx and F. En-
gels, :'elcclcd WOfhs in Two Volumes, \'01. 2, 1958.
r"larx K., Engels r., Thc Fi/st IndlQll Wal 01 Independence 1857-J859,
Moscow (s.a).
Lenin \'. I., "How the So< IdllstRevoiutiOflar:es Su;n. Up :he Re\ol.utlOn
and How Ihe Revolution Has Summed Them Up Collec/cd \\ olks,
vol. 15, fI.losco ..... , 1963. .
Lenin V. J. "ClasseS and Parties ItI Their AttItude to Religion and the
Church" Collrclcd \rorks, vol. 15. 1963, .
L - V I :'Th AWo:lken:n of ..\5:a". CoJ/ectcd \\ arks. vol. 19, 1963.
l en.m V I -, "Thee Slate Revolution", Col/ecled WOlks, vol. 25, 1964.
L
enlll
y' 'I' "I perialls'm, the Highest Stage of Capitalism", Col/ec/ed
enUl .', m
Works vol. 22, "E Aid
L
' Y I' "C ",pectus of Feuerbach s Book xposltlOn. na YSIS an
enm '" 0 of Lelbmz' ",-Collected \Volks, vo\. 38
Critique of the PhilOSOphy ,
.1963. "cond Cougress of the Communist international",-Co/-
LeJl.itI V. I., Se 31 1966
Iccted WOlks, vol. '. f ihe Communist International".-Collec/cd
Lenin V. I., "Third Congress ()
Works. vol. 32, 1965.
Memoirs, Political Pamphlets,
Articles, Speeches
IVins Freedom.
:\n Au/obioglaphical Nartath'c,
Azad A. K, Indio
So '''Y 1959 I of J"'I"e",-Th .... Pokiston Times,
I' isian1ic ('oncep "" ... ...
Fazl-i-HamH,
22. II. 1963. 's COllcr)t of God's Mercy",-The Pakistan Times,
Faz\_j_Hamid. "Islam
I. 111. 1%3.
119
I J96;
1Sop/lr
now a
J-J('f
Islam,
Pnki-
Is /he
ClrUclcs
n /he
:l other
'okislan
61 onJ
'okis/on
"!be SPirit of .. IS. IiI, 1%3
/"a:r/jll,lIllld .. Il-had 111 I:-'/,IHI. r.1I '(//,1.\[01/ 111/1.'" ?!'. 1\ Iii "
Jtnlldh M .. Speeches and \\'filings, Lahore, 1950, >.
Jmnah M., Speeches as Governor-General 01 1947-1948 .
. "'d
Tach: (s. a.'.
Khan M. 1., "Difference of Ideologies: Islamic ilnd Western. .. I I
S atnir Rel'iel\", \'01. X,XX\'JIJ, 1960, No ....
Lel/efs 01 Iqbal to Jinnah, Lahore, 1956.
Malik A. M., Labour PfOblems and Polic}, in Pakistan, Kdrdchl, 1954
:\faudoodl A A., Political Theor}, 01 Islam, Rdmpur (S.il.).
MdUdoO(h A A., Nalionalism and India, Palhankot, ,(j,17
MdUdoodl A. A., Convocation Address, Rampur, 1951
Maudoodl A A., The Economic PlOblcm of 'Ion and lis Is/amic So.
lution, Rampur, 1954.
MaudoodJ A. A., The Ethical View-Point 01 Is/am, Rampur, 1954_
Maudoodi A. A, Islamic Law and Constitution, Karachi, 1955.
Maudoodi A A, The ,""lessage 01 Jamaat-i-Islami, Lahore, 1955.
Maudoodi A. A, The Oadiani Problem, Karachi, 1956.
Maudoodi A A, Process 01 Islamic Revolution, Rarnpur, 1959.
Maudooli A A, The Blessings 01 Humanity,. -The VOice of Is/am,
vol VIII. 1960, No. 12.
\ faudoodl A" "Political Concepts in the Ouran", The Voice of h/am,
\'01. IX, 1961, Nos, fl, 7.
M:ludoodi A A., Towards Understanding Islam, Delhi, 1961.
Mufakklr, '!\lasser's Islamic Sociali<:rn",' -The Pakistan TImes, 31. iJ!1.
14, IV 1963.
)JI _)4 ..... ... ..
"'" J J.r.J
I' ., t - )y> 'Y - JJJ -'"" - J.>-:'''
I" , I -JY:>'Y - .i.e ... -I$JJJ.J'" .u;"::l,,-!I -'-:-
" .,. JY:> ':} - j ..:..::s::i:.... lC .. _ I$J J J.J'"' J! t .1::_
-)J<'Y-\f'":A_1 rlk; <J1k __ \.PJ'J- <!J'Y"I ",..
I"" 01,}-0L;. .1::-
. ..
-
-'--
-
"- -
Philosophical Works
A 01 "'Iuslim Plll/oSOPhy, ed. by M M
I. 1(6), wII, II, 1%6. _ .
Sharif, Wiesboden, vol.
Ahmdd A . "Sources of Iqbal's Perfect Man"_
Ahmad K D" "Re.lson and Faith",_ vol. 11[, 1958. No. I.
I, 19')8, "JI)_ .J. PhIlOSOPhical journal, vol.
120
.\IUll,ld 'fI.1 ( Till' I'III/f), f)flhy 01 tho Tf'(J('hinll.'1 0/ lsI '" h.
Inn 1'1.',:.
., =,'.2
A/nldl M.,. ','/WllII1II1H1 dllll J;lhl(!i" 1'100/, Vol II, IIJ()(), No.1.
All S_ A, 'r hI' )1 "<ilk Ian", vol. VIJI, 1959, No.1
Azral D. !-.-l, "NdtJOlldl ("JMrdc:lj'r". Pahi.,'an Phllosoph/ral Journal, VOl,
V, 1%1, No. I.
Azral D. M" "Plillosophy
Brohi :\. K. "In D"rl'jI(j'
Choudhurl S,Z" "Hf:clsrlll
vol. I, 19.')B, No. J.
III blsl i'dkisldfl",_ 1962. t\o 2
l{plt1!:on" Pahis/an, vol. V, No.2
,Hid [..11111" Phi/asophiw/ JOUrnal,
Dar B. A., "The Ide,1 of S,11'1II Ifl IqlHI and MJlion",_ -Iqbal.
f, 1952, No. I Vol,
Dar B. A., "Intellect d/lll [lIlIlltUJ/1 III dnd Suhs' ,_ Iqbal. vol, IV,
1956, No. ;J,
Dar B., A, Thought 01 },ayyid Ahmad Khan, Lahore, 1957. ,
Dar B. A, "Philosophy in Pdklstan", Pakistan, 1959, No.3.
Dar B. A., "What Is Islami<.: Culture?"" Islamic Cul/ure: a SympOsium,
Ka rachi, 1959.
Dar 8. A, Ouranic Ethics, Lahore, 1960.
Oev G. Ch., Idealism and Progress, Calcutta, 1952.
Dev G. eh., "A Glimpse of the Philosophy of the Future"
Third Session,
Pakistan Philosophical Congress, Lahore, 1956.
Dev G. Ch., "[dealism, a New Defence and a New Application", la.
hare, 1958.
Dev G. Ch., "Need of Philosophy ill the Modern WorJd,"-Pakistan
Philosophical Journal, vol. II, 1959, No.3. _ . ,
Dev G. Ch., "Basic Human Values",--Seventh Session. PakIstan PhIlo-
sophical Congress, Lahore, 1960.. _ ".
Erfan N., "What Is Common Between EXistentialists and Iqbal ,-Nmth
Session. Pakistan Philosophical Lahore, 1962.
Hakim H. A., Islum and Communism, Lahore, 1954."
Hamid A, "The ,\ldter,dJisllc ConceptIOn of History -Iqbal, vol. 11,
1952, No. I. . R , 38
HamiduJlah M., "Islam and Communism",-The IslamIC eview, va. ,
1950, No.3. /. L h 1959
J Th Ideology 01 Pakistan ancl lis Imp/ementa IOn, a ore, '
lqbb. " '-,' TellC Development 01 in Persia, London, 190R
Iq a ,,,., I I
hal M Islam alld A/lnlGd/sm, L.<1lore s. a,.
Iq M. "The Recons/ruction 01 RCliglous T/rought in Islam, Lahore, 1962 .
Iqbal., . Symposium, Karachi, 1959.
IslamIC CUI/UTC. a, , A ldr(>ss" . Sixth SC$sian, Pakistan P/rilosophical
Jilani G., "PresJdenlm ( ,
Congress, u,hore, 1959. . " p ,._ to Philosophical
I - G "Problems of NatlOllal Character, - an's n
JI dill., I III 1959, No.1.
Journal, Eleventh Session. Pakistan Philosophical
Khanum N., 1964
Man", Iqbal, vol. J, 1952, No. I .
Khatoon J., Jq 1 God /llan and Universc in the PhilosophIC
J The Place 0 ,
Khaloon, b I Kardchi, 1963.
System of Iq a, d Education".- Pakistan Philosophical Journal,
Lan I "Psychology an
I f, 1958, No.3. d Social Change" -International Social Science
A
"Islam an
Latif S. ., I V 1953, No.4.
Bulletin, upon Ihe Nature of Response",-Traditional
Mekhry G. ivL South.East Asia, 1958.
CuI/utes In
121
:eived
/96:
ence;;)
now a
H"
Islam,
Paki-
$ the
n the
fa/her
'akislan
)l and
'akis/an
L..-,.rir ( :\. '\f".:I1
11 ()I lie ,l.ahott' Iq:'iti
W. C '\' Reason otnd Fotlth"
1(1)8, No i,
J'alil:slan I'lli/osuphJHlI
)Urll<J/. vol.
Q<idtr C A. 'Economic Dt,ye!\)pment <lut! l\lmdl \ dlut' ,
It $tan 13.1. 1963.
Til' Pu.
Udd:r c. A_, "Y)uth and
14. 1\', 1963.
Th\ Pull/stlln T '1lt'
Qitdir C'. A. Ex.istentialism. A Crlti('a/ Examination, I.lhoTc, 1965,
fJayym Human Yalth.''' ,"cn'nll, Pili.
losophical Congre"s, Lahore, I9\iO,
Qureshi I. H" "The Problem ()( t\'ollionill Ch<lJad{'f",
sophical Journal, \"01. V" 1961, No, I.
RaflUddin 1\1" "National C'harllcter" Puki.,ton JOU/flO/,
voL V, 19tH, No. 1.
Rahman F., "Communism, Islam and Scienttfic Social Order",/s/amlc
Re\,/('I\', vol. 44, 1956, No.5.
Rahman r" "Challenge to Modern Ideas dnd Social Values of Muslim
Society,"- --Pakistan, 1958, No. L
Rdhmotn E, "Muslim Modernism in the IndoPakistan Subcontinent",
Bulletin 01 the School 01 Orient and Afric.'a L"'ondon, vol.
XXI, 1958.
Rahman F. 'Reality and Value' Pakistan Phi/osophl('ol Journal, vol
II, 1959, No.3.
R<ihnan r
V,I%
"The Sell and Ideal"
o 3.
Philosophical Journal, vol.
RaJ.IT F t "-ltlstence, Notion of Self-Consistency and Tntuitton",-
Eleven/n Session. Pakistan Philosophical Congress, Lahore, 1964.
Rasbe_d \., R('i,!;on and Faith",- -Pakistan Phi/osopltical Journal, vol.
.I, 19: 3, .0 3.
C' 1 q K 'Basic Human \'<i]ues ,- Sevcn/h Session. PUhrstan Philo.
sophiClI Congress, Lahore, 1960,
Sadiq K.l
J
. 'Philosophy of Life",-Pakistan PhiJosopllical Journal, vol.
VI, 1962, No.2.
M., MarXism Of Islam?', Hyderdbad, Ill51
S:r1d.qt M" "SociaLs lie Trends in Is]am",-fr/bal, vol. L 1%2, No. I.
Siddlq .. \1., Whal h Islam?, Rampur, 1954.
Siddiqi M., "IndiVidual and Social Aspects of Morality",-Pakiston, vol.
II, 1959, No, 4,
Siddiqi M., "The Problem of National Character" -Pakistan Philosophi.
cal Journal, vol. V, 1961, No, 1. '
Shal.ou
1
S. M. "Islam and Social Welfure", _ The Pakistan Tjmes,
12. X.
::iharif M._ M" l'!uslim Thought. Origin and Aehie\'cment, Lahore, 1951.
M. "Dwlectical Monadism",_ Tlte ConlC'lnpofOfY Indian
Plli/osophy-, London, 1952.
"-h, rif M. M. "The Good Lile and Cthzensh,p' -:::i,xlI, Sesl.ion Pakistan
Lahore, 1959, .
.if M. .. Iqbal and His Thought, lahore, 1964
h f M. M .. hlamlc and EdU('Q/lonal Studies, L<thore 1964
'hi! f 1\1, -Studies ill Aeslhetks, lahore, 1964. ' -
Vanid A. Iqbal. Hi.'; Art and Thought, l.ondon, t959.
In/lor: IUion 10 Iqbal, Karachi (s. a.l.
",
:OJ .... ,
, ,
j' "".
..
.s''''
, .
11 -'",
\I,n
... ,
.lJ ,t..
JI "I
\ II,. rt
.,
" .
l"'rv
Yo
\ ... rh
)
-
,-,LA .. ,
""WI
\ .. I 'I j I T)-L:'"
,,'
J::.
..
. UT"" .L..
1 .. '\ r - I}"j ..... ...,n_
J
..... "
\ ... ' '\ -)Y> 'j - J '':l' 'r-4.
Works by Pakistani Historians, lawyers and Economists
Ahmad -\. :-'-1, LOI\' in Theory md Pn
Ahmad J., "Secular Demonacy and ISHmic Slate' T e I'll :('., ::
12. IV. 1963,
Ahmad M., Govell1ment and Polilics in Pakistan, 19SCI
Akhtar S. M., Tlte Economics 01 PakMan, Lahon 1951
Ali M. K" "Attempts to Stifle the Voi e of Pakistan,
mes, 3. V. 1963.
. ....
Azad M., The PrinCiples of Stafc and 'n Islal
Los Angeles, 1961.
Berkeley-
Aziz A., Discovcry of PaJiislan. L:lhore, 1951. .
Aziz A., Islamic Modernism in India and Pal,slan
ford, 1961.
11571964, Ox-
Beg A., The QuiC'l Revo/ulion, KdfdCht. 1959,.
Brohi A. K., Fundamen1dl Ldll' Pdk:s:.:m !:'at I 'h
Choudhury G N., "The Isldmil' (oncep! of Slate n Pdl n ,
vol. VIII, 195B, r'\o, I,
Choudhury G. W" COlls(itulional in Pakistan, Lahore,
1959, r'_ I \ b" C 'I HJ'J ."
Ch II
Y
G 'V "Pdkisldtl under vetle"l ," yu . urrtn -30,.,. o\!( mf , . ,
vol 40, 1961, No. 235. ,.
" A Islamic JuriSPlUdl'flC('. KlrdcJu,
Farukl K. ""II 'c Flmily Law in PakIstan III the Conll'ltt of Mo.
Farukt K. A, 5 a, in the World of Isldm' ,-Islamic Review,
dem RefornllS
vol. 53, No, 5, Economic Planninq. A Cas, Study 01 Pakistan,
Haq M., Thc .
k
'96
,st!'n's New Dispensdtion' Commonwcalth JOurnal, vol.
Islam ., a
V, 1962'"N,O. 6',wd Tot.tlltoHidlllsm"
Khan M, I., Is am
Islami R('\'i('l\ \"oJ. 36, 1948,
No.3. . 10 &SI(, DemoNQer, KilTiU hi, 1960.
Khan S., An Forelgn Policy,
Kh S
Paklslan
an .,
Ka
raehi, 1961.
eived
196;
sopbr
10W a
lIer
Islam,
Paki
;) the
1,/icle5
n /he
la/her
akislan
51 an;/
'ok is/an
\!os/('m .Va/iona/ism it! [milO PJkljlan, \\' :stlLlIJ;!ton 1%
Mdllk Ii. 'D po/Hirol Par/h.'s in ralliS/On. Lahore \fl.\.
"Id/Illuddli
l
.. I C I Sl U'tUTf> of I ' "
' , G A 'Ec()nOOllC.s ill I Ie :-.<,': <l . r m r lkl .<11
Par\("5 .
vol ,"Ill. 1 Cl58, 1'0. I . .
h'l H "The Concept of So.,Vt'c('I'!nly lInl EXN: It.v IOV In.
Qurcs I ,; p" 0 '('cdmgs of the 2m ,\f/Pokislun rom 'al lonf("cn"
menl,--(l.
Karachi, 1952. _. _ .., _
'h I H The' Pakistani \\ or 01 Lik LIII. t, 1:b7
QUTe5l .. , ,n' 'l I
Q -II I H Pakistan. An Is am/( erno, ral}. ,.\1,(11(> 1I.1I.),
Q
ures.
h
' [' H "' The D('\'c/opmcnl 01 fndo-,\luslim Culture LlhuH' . d.)
ure5 l, .. h I' II I TI I '
Q h
' I H 'Islamic Elements In lE'O I 1(.\ 1\ of P<lkj.
ures J -, , 'E ")'
stan", -Tradition, Values, and .sonD- ('onarnl( en' opm('n/. nur_
ham, 1961. _
Qureshi I. Ii .. ''The Background of Some. Trends In ,lsI,lm!C Political
Tradition, Values and SocloEconOrlll(' n('\'C'/opml'llt,
Durham, 1961.
Qureshi I. H., Aspects 01 tile Histor)', Cul/ure and RC'/iglon 01 Pakistan,
1963.
Sayeed K. B" 'The Jamaat-i-Isl?"u Movement Jtl Ptlklst,Itl",- Pacilit
Affairs, vol. XXX, 1957, No. I.
Sayeed K, S, "Collapse of Parliamentary Democr<lCY !Il PilkIS!,W' -Thc
.\lidd/(> Easl JouTllal, vol. XIII. 1959, No.4.
Sayeed K.8., Pakistan. The Formatl\'e Phase, 1960.
Sdyeed K. B., "Pakistan's Basic Democracy", _'liddle East Journa/, vol.
XV, 1961. No, 3,
Sayeed K. B., "Religion and National Building in Pakistan", -The Middle
Easl JouTlla/, Summer 1963.
Shafi M., Eleven Years 01 Lllbour Policy, Kaxadli. 1959.
Sulery Z. A. Whilher Pakistan, London, 1949.
Sulery Z. A .. Pakistan, Lost Years. Being a Survey of a Deco/(: 01 Polilics
1948-1958, Lahore. 1962.
\ ' 0 'f )-,,,')I-./lii .r. ..,.r?,-.J ..::,_.d .. - Jl:J1 - J.
.. )J1 Jl:JI-0l..:.c1
- ''\oV- (
Official Documents
The Conslituenl Assembly 01 Pakistan. Ollkia) Reporl. Debates, Kara-
chi, 1949-1956.
The Conslitutlon 01 the Republic 01 Pakistan, Kdfdchi, 1962.
Economic Survey 01 Pakistan, Rawalpifldi, 1963.
Inl1oducllon 01 Bwfic Democracies in Pakistan, BuredU Or Ndtional Re-
conslrucllon, Government oLPakislo.ln (s. I , s. iJ.).
Report 01 the Court 01 InqUiry COll!;lilU/Cd under Punjab A(t II 01 1954
to Inquire into the Punjab Disturbances 01 1953, ldh(,re, 1954.
Rcport 01 Ihe Commission on NatiOnal Education K ' h' 1959
, arac 1, .
Specches (lnd Documcn/s 01 the Indwn Com/lit/lion, 1921.11)47, vol. 1,
Bombay, 1957.
/24
Monographs Ind Articles
,\OIke),(>v r, (I 1(' 1(' VfOl 11 ) poll he lI.lyl' vlf'IY,ldy _1;Jd
I( Jld 1\ ,'I :>y vo !:>kOVT' I, 11yr "Jo I
,\1 Ik e ".J ) Vy 1(1)" 1_: '1IIYllVII i/ltel I pod Iqbal,
f., CI ow, I<J: I.
BdI'lhIlSht' u h v. V h IJ Pllku!/om r,.shkent 19.n
l!<Htol
ti
v 'Khollil sUltan', f.iJf 1.1IaUlo, vol. I. 1912.
[ldtdlov E. Y "Osn lVllI)'e n,lprdvlent),<l Id,.VlllYd filosofskoT mysll v
;,lrdn"kh Alii I Afnkl', Voprosy fl/owl/f, 1964, No. 12.
Beldyev y, A, Iwktonts/vo, Moscow, 1957.
Bcldyev Y. A., Araby, Islam i arabsky k/lalilal v rannee srednevekovye,
fl.-Io::;tow, I GuS.
13elt'nky :\, B., IlIolmzhdr'niye Indonl'zii, 1%5.
Bertt'ls Y. E. 'Sulism I slIllysko.lYd hterJtuf<l.- Izbl()Omye /wdy,
cow, 1%5.
BrutenUi K. N., Protiv idro/ogii sovremennogo koJonlaUzma, Mos-
cow, 1961.
Brutents K. N., "0 nekotorykh osobennostYdkh sovremennogo natsional-
r!vizheniY,j", Voprosy /ilosofJi, 1965, Nos. 1, 6.
Drobn!tsky O. G" KUZmtnd r. !\, I\rilika burzhuuznykh
kontseplsy, :Vloscow, 1%7,
Dyakov A. M" Notsiana/ny vopros I angliysky imperiolism v Indll,
Moscow, 1948.
Oyakov A. M., Indlya vo vrcmya i pos/e vlotoy mirovoy voyny (1939-
1949), Moscow, 1952.
Dyakov A. M., Nolsiono/ny vopros v sovr\,mennoy Ina iI, .'loscol-\", 1963-
Fi/oso/skaya cntsik/opedIY(J, vols. 1-1. 1960-1964.
Gankovsky Y. V., Narody Pakis/anu. Moscow, 1964.
Gankovsky y, V., Gordon-Polonskaya L R, Istoriya Pakisfana, Moscow,
196\. k I h' P
Gankovsky Y. V., Moskalenko V. N., Politiches oye po oz ell/ye v 0-
kis/ane Moscow, 1960.
L. R., Musu/manskiye techeniya v obsches/vennOI
mysli Indii i Pakis/ana, Moscow, 1962. ,
, S N Iz istorii lIIosof/i Azil I Irana (VI/XII vv.),
Gngoryan . .,
Moscow, 1960. S d
d
., yo li/osolJya narodov i re ne
Grigoryan S. N., Sre neve"ova
O
Vostoka, f'o.' loscow, 1966. .
g , cm('nnogo natsionalnoosvobodltclnogo dvizheniya,
Ide%glya sovr
966
Moscow, I, .. d by Ivl A. Dynn!k, M, J. lovchuk a.o., vols. IVI,
Istof/yO 11/050 II, e . '
M
oscoW, 195719G5. V t k
. . vcdcniya mysillc/el slran Blizhncgo I Srednego os 0 a,
17blOtJ/uyc prolz.
MoscoW, 19b1. ,
, (' 1<15-',
Kobus
nom
" IS/(lII1. Qc/lcrkl, Mosc<?w, 1962,
Kluno
vlch
. L., ,dars/
v
Bhzlw('go i Srednega Vosloka, 1956.
Kons/ilutslYa
Koran, MoscoW, .
I 1M In En.l!'hsh: A. M, Dyako ..... 111e Nahona/ Prob/(>m
Also ,l\'dld 1966
'd Moscow, . d P 1
In India fo oy, I bit'! Ifl English: V V. Ganko\'sky, L. R. Gor I)n- 0 on-
.' Also ,wa
l
d 01 Pakistan, Moscow, 1964.
A !llslory
skaya, 125
:ciVrd
119M
icncesJ
noW (I
1/('1
Islam,
I Pakl-
the
w!iC'les
In the
d olher
D(lkislan
'61 01';/
"
,alnJ-)$\'ubo (('/(Jor(' ,L II' I ('lIh'
,
"
,
Iv'). 13.
,,"Qlara /O,',lI :I,i, ;"losC"(m, J!lh
"01 Lj' .l) U '",.a inclll .W '1
"() n h" 11 I \ 11 ItS",>I' 1111 OW, )odlll' II (Iv.
mira )/ :c.li.n a, \,1:,'1, f\,o R (l
lelll\
my
Y "Sot! :1hSIII"hl'sk're doklnny . VJYI' 1Sj'.
dn: [OllllY sotSLllno'YI' ,>l,.a!('J/.h,III1YC \[110\ lVa 1).1, kU J
m zh:fWIJfOdm)'I' ""OS/WnlrQ, I'lld. No I.
Pl{'khill 0\' C y, 0 r(,ligl' I '.<;('1/;.\'; "In:>('!)\\', i'l.
e
,H,
R, ,ty ..... ,1\ \, (: \" 1111 1 S \., l' JIll .!lY I'k IOllllk
\[,hl \\1 Q)8
]I lila
,
Rokili K., I\atan i "Ommunizm. :\Ioscow, 1!120,
ShmelyO\' N, P .. Idcologl imp('ria/isma i pwbkmr sJaIJor07\'ilykll
\1
, q 'J
. usc-ow, .lI.
Smimol N. A.. SOI'femCIIlI), r..rOSCOw, 1 (BO.
Solutel' A, ";'\<llsiOllaltwYiI dcmokratiya put k sOlsidlnomy progreso
s\! Problemy mira i Iqfi:1, N(l. 2.
'<:()\' "Ill' 1/ 0P' nal: iOIl(Jlnu-o."i\obodi/dlloy CI\IZ!JCIH'(' I
:>, ll!lle_ 19h1
SO\"f(,In('nny obr<.'kli\ny idcolillll, l\loscow, \tlt.>:l.
Tyagulll'ilkl) \ NdWdy proliv kapilalistu:heskogo puti",
1%2. l\(). 1:;.
!\ommunisl,
UlY;lJ\ovsky R., 'Ekononiicheskayll. nel.d\isimost- -blizhayshaya zadach/!
osyoboditelnogo dvi2heniya v AZii", I\ommunist, 1962, No. 1
UlYdllO\"Sky R .. "oprosy rM.\"iUya
)5\'0:>0 ivshikhsya s\ran",-- 1\0mmunisl, 1966, No. L
YurpYl( h L 'Saiyi Akhmad-khdll j 7aTozhdenlye nlllsulmanskogo 0[;'
Shchilll ogo d"izheniya v ludii" -Uclleniyc :zapiski Tikllookeanskogo
Ilsli/ula \.N SSSR, \'01. 11,
Zhukov Y M. '0 Ilekolorykh voprosakh nalsionalno-osvobodilelnogo
v stranakh Vostoka",- SllOi/eISI\o kommunizma-delo
n II/IOIIOY Iyudcj Iruda, Moscow, 1959.
7.hukov Y M., "Leninizm 1 sonemenrllye problemy natsionalno.osvo-
h)dl t!l/l)go dVizheniya",-Vc/ikoye 10r:zlIeslVo ide; leninizma, Mos-
'ow KiO.
AhllOt F. ecline 01 the Empire and Shah Waliullah' ,_ Tlte
MU1!im \.,oJ/d, V)j Ill, 1962, 2-
Ahbot F., l:>lam alld Pakislan, New York, 1968.
"Islam in Pakistan",_ -Modeln Trends in World Religions, La
Salle (111.), 1959.
Alhiruni A. II., 01 Pakislan and Modern Muslim Inriia, la-
noe I ()50
Asian Nalionalism and Ille \\/esl, cd. by W H II d N Y k 1953
8 '1 \N f .' ,. ,. . 0 an, ew or, .
". '.' . JOlla Jsm and ill EOSI ASia, Carlton, 1953.
I he Hasr 'mo. [dt If'S m Paklstull' MUll kind I, N I 19G1
Bprn lTd L ", n n I I' , vo. -, tnem lef,
- )Q') l' IInl !ll ,n( sl,un",_ fnlelnal/onal Allalrs, vol. XXX,
Bi '" I r, af {qOOts Al;ml d 'f! I . 1954
131 r"ltler L, 'P-ill; lim ill1(1 Modem Isl'ImiC
an
N r IOUa, 1/, in.<lhOre,.. Th
l\1iar/I(.' )51 lown!'!1 yol X, ' M7 N d IOnn 1St leory ,--- c
. . '. - . .,-} , O. -1' vol XII 1%8 N I
Blndt-r L, RdlgJon and POlilics til Pakistall D 'k I . - . . , o ..
UIJllb.dUIO E.. Some Tlieofc/lcal and 196 1.
(:Io(t oj Karachi, 1956. 01 Ille IslanZlc
/
" _'(J
,
r ,
..
, ,
" r k 'I,
" "
We -J. \ X\ol I
I'll J I I'll (In (JI II
( 11111 K Il p)/ , (:o/t 'i aJ<
Ilpb H r Pl1, 'Ull rn allly I
on JIll nl'y L '"
/.JJW In lop -'.} (. JI I"
(fell'l K 'T I It (> h.; , If P I
111 In,' 1/11.\1/ 11 Ul 0
(ril' '! , , 1
lolu'!h )f", I.
:Jl'v .G-
o'! 1947 IS'
,
" p , ,
,
o
"
,
, n l )h:
I'f"ldmdn II. A C(m IJ/ullon lor I' lI...n 1.'_
A. nl.., m JI 1-1 I k. I n '"he
/lJ/I. v --" , ,
f'l1Idl,lnd W "fvf'dem
vol. X. j(JI,(J. '0 )
n 1e ( e ), I
" " '
,
)(' )/ogus,
rlJlf'/son H. J.I )13jL 1 ,:
Politks, V)!. XXTl. 'V
'<
,
" ,,'
"
Ghosh A. "Paklst,n Den, ",
Gho<;h A, I')r/cnl. .. , 19:1.
Gibb II.AR Modern Trenls II I 1"[111, C _ Ii!.).
Gibh H. A. R .\Iohamm rl 1. ,.. ]1
Gibb H A. R "Islam in h Mo" Tn World Th
and ,\Iu.'llirl Aftica. Nw v k 1961.
Gopdl R Indiun Mu /1m :JI_IC 1 1 )I
IllStl
,
,
Crune ),IUIII ., '" .... I F 'P,b,,, , al n' m'
WcM, London. t.
y
A1
194j J.
GruII(>hdurn (i. F. m T"c', rt ,1 1 ( J/"' ,,:JJ 10
ley-Los 196:!. _
Hah,lchy S .. "Plopprly R o.:h'_ .,111 t 11/, ': Mus
Law R('\'jcw, vol. 62, Iq61 3.
Hale-pold A. \V .. "Shah \\"ll:ullllh'o
Journal. vo]. J" .1.
Halpem M .. (
,
11 for
,w
'y'
, h.
o ..:.J/
0'
v
lhl 'he
,
Pakidan
World, vol. XLIII. ]Q5.l . "
h . EI [Inri Communism n he:..li Ie" E..
HdS Iml ., 0 .
ConiC
!Of RCI'i('II", II"l.'i3,No. I Ih "
Y
rr
E "TIle Probll'lIls of Pakistan
Ifln\erho __ ,
A .. )11 VOlI. 56
1
960, No. 207. / I"'." Lo d vo, I' ,.52
. , PI 'losopl!l' anc t rn, non. . _, . .
Hlslory 0 II. -. IQ'i'I
. H ('[s/alll, P,}f]S, .' -. La e "
MdSM' ., "d" \\ arId cd. by J. \1. Ril, e.
Modcrn Tren ., w .
. (111). IIl.'ititt' Indian .'Ius/in;.,. 10ndol1, 196',.
fl,luJeeh \1:, "The l\lnslituIIOll<11 F\'?lut:OI: 01 Pak
Newman K .. J_. X..::"\:\"III. 11)1;2, :\(1. J.
Alfon.-. .. in lournol 01 ..\. :W SlUr.
Owen J. E.
,
QtiO I'll. 1. , .... ",'.,.,u
. . . '"\t'\\' \.-"
"P,lkisl,!n. Jhe .
No. 201. wt'r PolitiCS dnd :he r lnst:lut!on'
" Pakistan. pOl'i'i No. ]RI.
celll
hN
. \I,','h lind M(\{lernlsrs"
\"\ tI
"p/lkislall. .
t\<). Ilill
Round J lbl('
I, -
"'
,
, , \
'n';I' d
n 19"'''
o.wpl!r
'irnees)
nOli" a
/ler
:1 Pnkl-
;!I Ihe
u'I;r/r3
111 Ihe
Id other
Pakislan
161 and
Paki!llall
...,.. L T "Ill,.,k Thought of India. London, 1953.
-.. a. L J. '"The !eI'mlC 1.._ And Constitution" -]merRO"
A'rh, YOl. xxxvm. 1962. No.3. 'OIlGl
......... '0' T'-: It-'1aI c.tH:epl oJ Preedom. Prior 10 t h ~ Nlneteenlh
c.nr,-, 111 : I, .980 .
...... "". W. L P ]I.chl 'I' of CooetituUon Buildine in PakiMan"
Ana Rev .... 1962. No. 215. ,-
n.m 1l0III lhe Gallow .. RavtdpJndl Conspiracy Caae, Bombay 1951
",. .,111 0/ Pot'stIUl, CAlcutta. 1955. .
I 8., "Social Change in Pakistan",-SoC'/OJogy 01'Id
vol. . 1960. No.3.
....
In'o Paleis'an, Patne, 1954.
oIl.lam, ed. by H. A. V. Gibb and J. H. Kramers.
of Controlled Democracy in Pakistan",_
. 1963, No.5.
11<41 ACtiVity in Pakistan. 1947.1961",_
Quarlerly, 1962. No. t.
In India. London, 1946.
GI an lllamic Slate, Lahore, 1951.
lab. In Modern HI.tOIY, Princeton, 1957.
'x, PGk"'OII. ed. by P. BFilillignet. Dacca 1960.
1,lsm aDd 1M West",-Cenlury. vol. '152. 1952
01 Bclenllllc Managemenl, New York. 1917.
CIIId' PaklalfUt. Calcutta, 1959.
Konc:bl fl .. ).
T,. CoftlO/ldallon 01 a Nollon, New York.
Abbasids 48
ai-Afghani. Djamal udDlD. 23
Ahmad, Amin 109
Ahmad. Alhar t 10
Ahmad, Mirza Ghulam 53
Ahmed, M. 96, 111
Aird, J.5. 98
Alexander. S. t 16
Anikeyev, N. P. 11
Aristotle 35, 103, 104, III
Ashraf. M. 15
Aslam, Qazl M. 1OG-102, 117
Ala, Abul Kba5?n 87
Atrya. 8. L. tOO
8elayev. Y. A. 16
Bentham, J. 101
Berestnev, V.F. 110, 113
IIe,,,,,,,n, H. 29, 30. 37, 104, I,.
Bertels. Y.E. 28
B!I re lenet. P. 98
Binder, L. t 6
8mbl, A.K. 16, 45. 88, I lOt "'
Browne. E.G. 30
IS, 78. 117
M III
115
103, III
110. 117
7-9, II, It,
</0, "'51. 68, 117,
50
12, 58,
;,;4D,;.I::' '03, III
_Ie._.
A" 117. III
...... L 58, 511
til .... 3D. ...
I.
Het
11Iam,
PaId-
.. .110
GlIIC_
I. /flo
.,""
V'nill, \.1. 10.1, 10.'>, !HI;
1."\'I.str,uIMi, ('. 'lR
LiMIU.l! Ali Kh.m Hoi
I\fdh.ldl'vd J.'>
f-Iallk, AM, 78
f-Iahk, 0. 82
dl-M.HllUJI -Ill
Mallsoor, ft'rOle ud-Oin 15
Marx, K. 46, 58, 69, 74, 10.1,
105
H. Ih
MaudOO<!i, Alml Ala IS, 45, 47,
m, 82, 83, 87, 89, 91
Milton, J. 50
Muminov, Ulf 99, 100, 109
t. luhanlm,ld Ali 86
N('wmatl, K G, 110112
Nif.>ILSCht' 30, 31, 37
Oizerllldn, TI, 110
Omelyanonky, t.1E. 99, 100, 109
Ostwald, WE 104
Pavlo\', I p, 114, 116
Perry, R. 56
Plato 35, 111
Plekhanov, G.'" 48
Polonskaya. LR. 10, 17
Pushkm 107
Qadir, C.k 40, 44, 117
(Jayyum, Abdul 55, 56, 110
Qureshi, IH 15, 16, 57, 84
Radhdkrishnan, S. 96
Rahuddin. M 57, 61
Rahman, Fazlur 38,110, 11 6
1{" .. AI ,II 40 110
H, 1M." II 101
.1 IIIIIJI I:J I ]'
I 'II
II rlr.1Il1 I II,
S.ul"l, K!; )1
s..nt",'.lIld, (" II>
S.uYlti, 1'.1.,'\ 2.';
S"yt'\'d, K Ii. It>
III
S('hillp, P lUll
SI'IIlYll!lO\', V.S I IIi
\V :1,,>
Sh,lnkdl.j :15
Sh,mf, t.l.r..I. 15, :\.\ :Iii, :18, J!'l, 4!'l
51, (i i , 'hi. !'J7, ')'1, 10l), 110'
ILl,ll(i '
Sht>JnkhOVd, \.\ IUi,I17
Slddltti. IlH. 117
Siddiqi, Rd/.Jutldin q<:l
Sm(>I, RY, d(' 1(;
Smirnuv, 1'\ . .-\, irl
Smith, W.e 16, 17
Spinoza 103
Slep,IIlYdnls, M 9, Ilfi
Sulery. Z.A Iii
Tdylor, FW. 78
Tolstoy 107
Toynh('" A.\, 112
\\'dl ulldh, Shdh 1820
\VllItt'hl',1(1, A 116
YUrevich, L.l, 17
Zaidi, I. H. 110
CTtn.l ... " ..... M .. p ... :tlT.I THrp.l ... o ......
H C04Hor.orHR
s nAKHCTAH
,
SR
lfCC VI: f
HI 1 ':II).,
I/(')Op/I),
now a
lIt' 1/, I
In 1.,Jom,
'nd Pukl-
/;'1 I he
)/ 0"1(1("
In the
lnd o/he
Pak/J/an
1961 an ..
Pall. : In