Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Patti Herrington FRIT 7430: Instructional Design Stage 1, Understanding by Design June 24, 2012
Patti Herrington
Grade Level
Fifth (5th)
Related Misconceptions:
Numerators and denominators can be added or subtracted. (Do not realize that the denominator is the size of the fractional part and the numerator is the number of the part.) EX. 1/3 + 2/5 = 3/8 Not finding a common denominator when adding or subtracting fractions with unlike denominators. Working with only the whole number or the fractional part of a mixed number. Multiplying on the numerator by numerator and leaving the denominator the same when multiplying fractions. When multiplying mixed numbers by mixed numbers multiplying the whole numbers and then the fractions instead of converting the mixed number to an improper fraction. Inversion problems with dividing fractions. http://www.ernweb.com/public/1237print.cfm
Patti Herrington
Essential Questions
(copy and paste from Stage 1) Overarching Questions:
How do fractions play a part in our everyday lives? Why should I learn about fractions? Why are fractions such an important part of mathematics? How can fractions be modeled, compared, and ordered? Identify real world situations when fractions are used to represent numbers?
Topical Questions:
How do I recognize and name equivalent fractions? How do I identify fractions as part of a whole and part of a set? How to I read and write common fractions? How can using the greatest common factor help me write a fraction in simplest form? How do I add and subtract fractions with like denominators? How do I add and subtract fractions with unlike denominators using the Least Common Multiple? How do I add and subtract mixed numbers? How can I multiply fractions? How do I recognize and rename improper fractions and mixed numbers? What methods can be used to compare fractions? How are common denominators used to compare fractions? How can addition/subtraction of fractions be represented by objects, pictures, words and numbers? How do I identify the inverse relationship when dividing fractions?
Patti Herrington
Patti Herrington
Your
Score
One to two types of representations are included. Representation Examples do not apply to real life experience with fractions. Uses limited mathematical conventions, vocabulary, and terminology with explaining reasoning and procedures. Most representations are included throughout the presentation including pictures, numbers, and words. Examples apply to real life experiences. Uses some mathematical conventions, vocabulary, and terminology when explain reasoning and procedures. All representations are included throughout the presentation including pictures, numbers, and words. Examples apply to real life experiences. Uses mathematical conventions, vocabulary, and terminology when explaining reasoning and procedures. Expresses and organizes mathematical thinking effectively. An explanation of some skills was provided along with examples. Skills Skills *making equivalent fractions *changing improper to mixed fractions and mixed fractions to improper. *adding and subtracting fractions with like denominators. *adding and subtracting fractions with unlike denominators. *multiplying fractions. *dividing fractions. Project has 5 or more math, spelling, or grammatical errors. An explanation of most skills was provided along with examples. Skills *making equivalent fractions *changing improper to mixed fractions and mixed fractions to improper. *adding and subtracting fractions with like denominators. *adding and subtracting fractions with unlike denominators. *multiplying fractions. *dividing fractions. Project has 3-4 math, spelling, or grammatical errors. An explanation of all skills was provided along with examples. Skills *making equivalent fractions *changing improper to mixed fractions and mixed fractions to improper. *adding and subtracting fractions with like denominators. *adding and subtracting fractions with unlike denominators. *multiplying fractions. *dividing fractions. Project 0 - math, spelling, or grammatical errors.
/5
Communication
/5
/5
Mechanics
/5
Project is not neat and/or organized. Project is relatively neat and organized. Project shows creativity and very neat and organized.
Visual Appeal
/5
/25
Patti Herrington
Your
Score
Topic and Organization Narrative has no topic sentence. Ideas and opinions are not organized. Some errors in agreement, number, and/or tense. Grammar and Punctuation Many punctuation and/or case errors. Writing has one paragraph or has division but not my content. Simple sentences used. Several fragments and/or run on sentences are evident in writing. Narrative has a minimally developed topic. Ideas and opinions are expressed but not organized. Minor errors in agreement, number, and/or tense. Minor errors in punctuation and/or case. Ideas are divided appropriately into paragraphs with limited use of supporting details. A variety in the length and type of sentence is used. Evidence of one fragment or run on sentence is evident in writing. Narrative has a developed topic. Ideas and opinions are expressed and organized. No errors in agreement, number, and/or tense. No punctuation or case errors.
/5
/5
Ideas are divided appropriately into paragraphs with strong use of supporting details. A variety in the length and type of sentence is used. Writing contains no fragments or run on sentences.
/5
Vocabulary
Some use of key mathematical terms in narrative. Basic vocabulary words used. Hard to read. Letters not formed well.
Uses key mathematical terms in narrative. Ideas in narrative are minimally expressed. Word selection is limited. Legible. Letter formed well.
Uses key mathematical terms in narrative. Ideas in narrative flow well. Word selection is varied, interesting, and used appropriately. Neat. Easy to read. Well-formed letters.
/5 /5
/25
Patti Herrington
Audio/Video Podcast
(0-1 Points) (2-3 Points) (4-5 Points)
Your
Score
Script There is little evidence of planning. Script is not provided or is weak. Some key vocabulary is uses. Script contains mostly factual material and has many grammatical errors. A script was written for the podcast performance. Language used is good and some use of key vocabulary is included. Script contains factual material and has a few grammatical errors. A well written script was written for the podcast performance. Language used is interesting and uses key vocabulary. Script contains factual material and has no grammatical errors.
/5
Delivery
The podcast appears unrehearsed, the enunciation is muddled and not clear and the recitation lacks expression and enthusiasm The volume is poor for both music and voice, there is considerable background and other distracting noise, and there are several technical glitches. The group functioned fairly well, with most members contributing, sharing and supporting the others effort. They were sometimes on task.
The podcast is rehearsed, the enunciation is sometimes clear and intelligible, and there is some expression and enthusiasm in the recitation. The volume is good for both music and voice, there is little background or other distracting noise, and there are no technical glitches. The group functioned well, with all members contributing, sharing and supporting the others effort. They were almost always on task.
Audio/Technical
Group Work
The podcast is rehearsed and delivered smoothly, the enunciation is clear and intelligible, and there is expression and enthusiasm in the recitation. The volume is good for both music and voice, there is no background or other distracting noise, and there are no technical glitches. The group functioned exceptionally well, with all members contributing, sharing and supporting the others effort. They were always on task.
/5
/5 /5
/20
Patti Herrington
Your
Score
Response Student attempted to answer question(s). Written explanation did not support knowledge of content. Visual explanation did not support knowledge of content. Some errors in agreement, number, and/or tense. Grammar and Punctuation Many punctuation and/or case errors. Minimal use of key mathematical terminology is used in explanation. Appearance of paper is very messy. Writing is hard to read. Student answered question(s). Written explanation demonstrated minimal knowledge of content. Visual explanation demonstrated minimal knowledge of content. Minor errors in agreement, number, and/or tense. Minor errors in punctuation and/or case. Limited use of key mathematical terminology is used in explanation. Appearance of paper is somewhat messy. Writing is legible. Student answered question(s). Written explanation demonstrated complete knowledge of content. Visual explanation demonstrated complete knowledge of content. No errors in agreement, number, and/or tense. No punctuation or case errors.
/5
/5
Exclusive use of key mathematical terminology is used in explanation.
Vocabulary
/5
Appearance of paper is neat. Writing is easy to read. Wellformed numbers and letters.
/5
/20
Patti Herrington
Other Evidence
Patti Herrington
10
Fraction Story of Collage Facet 2 (Interpretation) Create a fraction story or collage (with/without technology) at shows various examples of using fractions in your daily life. Suggestions for use of technology might include using: www.mixbook.com; http://littlebirdtales.com; or www.glogster.com.
Patti Herrington
11
Problem Solving Rating Scale Facet 4 (Perspective) 1 3 5 _________________________________________ I do not understand the problem I can explain this problem
1 3 5 _________________________________________ I cannot recognize the important and unimportant parts of this problem. I can recognize the important and unimportant parts of this problem.
1 3 5 _________________________________________ I do not know where to start. I can solve the problem and explain my solution.
Patti Herrington
12
thumbs up
thumbs ok
thumbs down
Patti Herrington
13
(1-2 Points) Assessments appear to utilize some facets to build assessments for understanding.
(3 Points) Utilizes the six facets to build assessments for understanding. Assessments clearly identify the correlating facet. Assessments demonstrate congruency among goals Designs authentic performance task(s) Task(s) in alignment with goals and standards Designs a scoring rubric that includes distinct traits of understanding and successful performance Includes a variety (at least 3 types) of appropriate assessment formats within the unit to provide additional evidence of learning Self-assessments clearly used as feedback and reflection for students and teachers, as well as for evaluation.
Your
Score
/3
2.
Designs performance task, which requires learners to exhibit understanding through authentic performance tasks. Designs appropriate criterion-based scoring rubric to evaluate learner performance task(s) Includes at least two different formats of assessment.
/3 /3 /3 /3
3.
4.
Does not provide scoring rubric for the performance task(s) Selection of assessment formats is limited.
5.
/15