Documenti di Didattica
Documenti di Professioni
Documenti di Cultura
Agenda
About Sygma Motors Motivation and Objectives Problem Definition Multidisciplinary Workflow Disciplinary Workflows Preliminary Results
Mission
To provide innovative solutions, with high technological content and environmentally responsible, to be used in internal combustion engines.
Infra-Structure
MoTeC
dSpace
Engine Control Systems
FLEX DI ECU
Digital Scanning
LAB
INFRASTRUCTURE
PIV Particle Image Velocimetry
Objectives
Demonstrate an application of multidisciplinary design optimization in internal combustion engines Apply the process for a research engine Models are validated Show some techniques that aid in the integration of several disciplines in modeFRONTIER
Problem Definition
Optimize the engine efficiency
Indicated Efficiency Engine efficiency without taking friction into account Volumetric Efficiency Breathing capacity Enables the engine to deliver more power
Design Variables
Piston bowl geometry Keeping the compression ratio Lift profiles for intake and exhaust valves Ignition timing Fuel mass per cycle
Constraints
Valvetrain dynamic behavior Avoid collision between valves and piston Piston maximum temperature Piston maximum stress
Performance Analysis
Parameterized Kinematics
Dynamics Optimization
Workflow Implementation
The worfkflow is divided into disciplinary subsystems Data packges are exchanged between disciplines
Process Execution
GG - Geometry Generation
Piston bowl shape parameterization Separate models for mesh generation and performance analysis
Full piston model for mesh generation Piston crown model for performance analysis
Example:
Flame front area Fuel burn rate
p-V Diagram
Check dynamics
Optimize dynamics
Results
Preliminary results using Surrogate models
Radial Basis Functions interpolation
Results
High Indicated Efficiency Profile Parallel chart for Pareto frontier
Conclusions
Multidisciplinary design optimization will help us design competitive technologies More disciplines have to be included
Obtain turbulence parameters by CFD swirl, tumble and squish
Acknowledgements
Patrick Cardoso Clayton Zabeu Giovanni Kotinda Jean Rezende Felipe Cardoso Leandro Vieira Olindo Cruz Oswaldo Franca Jr. Ivan Trindade