Sei sulla pagina 1di 5

55144 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No.

176 / Monday, September 13, 2004 / Notices

community eligibility, report on Dated: September 8, 2004. come before the CPSAS or CPSMT for
confidentiality of CDQ information Alan D. Risenhoover, discussion, those issues may not be the
submitted to NMFS. Acting Director, Office of Sustainable subject of formal action during this
7. Halibut/Sablefish Individual Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. meeting. Action will be restricted to
Fishing Quotas (IFQs) Program: Initial [FR Doc. E4–2162 Filed 9–10–04; 8:45 am] those issues specifically listed in this
review of regulatory amendment BILLING CODE 3510–22–S document and any issues arising after
package for IFQ/CDQ Area 4C/4D, publication of this document that
initial review of regulatory amendment require emergency action under Section
package for IFQ amendments DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
(housekeeping and block). Conservation and Management Act,
8. Halibut Subsistence: Receive report National Oceanic and Atmospheric provided the public has been notified of
on ADF&G Subsistence Halibut Survey, Administration the CPSAS’s or CPSMT’s intent to take
initial review of regulatory amendment [I.D. 090704B] final action to address the emergency.
package.
9. Scallop Fishery Management Plan Special Accommodations
Pacific Fishery Management Council;
(FMP): Final action to modify License Public Meeting The meeting is physically accessible
Limitation Program and update FMP. to people with disabilities. Requests for
10. Crab FMP: Review Crab Stock AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries sign language interpretation or other
Assessment Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and auxiliary aids should be directed to Ms.
report. Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Carolyn Porter at (503) 820–2280 at least
11. Groundfish Management: Receive Commerce. 5 days prior to the meeting date.
report from Non-Target Species ACTION: Notice of public meetings.
Dated: September 8, 2004.
Committee, review initial discussion
SUMMARY: The Pacific Fishery Alan D. Risenhoover,
paper on rockfish management (T),
review discussion paper on Aleutian Management Council’s (Council) Coastal Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Pelagic Species Advisory Subpanel Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
Island Pollock Incidental Catch
Allowance (T), initial groundfish (CPSAS) and Coastal Pelagic Species [FR Doc. E4–2161 Filed 9–10–04; 8:45 am]
specifications, final action on FMP Management Team (CPSMT) will hold BILLING CODE 3510–22–S

updates. work sessions, which are open to the


12. Staff Tasking: Review tasking and public.
Committee (including AP policy) and DATES: The CPSAS will meet Tuesday, COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
provide direction to staff/action as September 28, 2004 from 9 a.m. to 5 COMMISSION
necessary. p.m. and Wednesday, September 29,
13. Other Business: 2004 from 9 a.m. until business for the Sunshine Act Meetings
Scientific and Statistical Committee day is completed. The CPSMT will meet
(SSC): The SSC agenda will include the TIME AND DATE: 10:30 a.m., Thursday,
Thursday, September 30, 2004 from 9
following issues: September 16, 2004.
a.m. until business for the day is
1. EFH and HAPC completed. PLACE: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington,
2. IR/IU DC, Commission Conference Room.
ADDRESSES: The meetings will be held at
3. Halibut Subsistence and IFQ STATUS: Closed.
program adjustments NMFS, Southwest Region, Glenn
Anderson Federal Building, 501 West MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Rule
4. Crab Management Enforcement Reviews.
5. Groundfish Management Ocean Blvd., Conference Room 3300,
Advisory Panel: The Advisory Panel Long Beach, CA 90802; telephone: (562) FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean
will address the same agenda issues as 980–4000. A. Webb, (202) 418–5100 or http://
the Council. Council address: Pacific Fishery www.cftc.gov.
Although non-emergency issues not Management Council, 7700 NE
Jean A. Webb,
contained in this agenda may come Ambassador Place, Suite 200, Portland,
OR 97220–1384. Secretary of the Commission.
before these groups for discussion, those [FR Doc. 04–20691 Filed 9–9–04; 1:26 pm]
issues may not be the subject of formal FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Dan Waldeck, Pacific Fishery BILLING CODE 6351–01–M
action during this meeting. Action will
be restricted to those issues specifically Management Council; telephone: (503)
identified in this notice and any issues 820–2280.
arising after publication of this notice SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
that require emergency action under CPSAS will meet to continue to work on
Office of Postsecondary Education;
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens developing alternatives for annual
Overview Information; Fund for the
Fishery Conservation and Management allocation of the Pacific sardine harvest
Improvement of Postsecondary
Act, provided the public has been guideline. The CPSAS will also review
Education—The Comprehensive
notified of the Council’s intent to take the 2004 Pacific sardine stock
Program; Notice Inviting Applications
final action to address the emergency. assessment and harvest guideline
for New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY)
recommendation for the 2005 season.
Special Accommodations 2005
The CPSMT will focus on review of the
These meetings are physically Pacific sardine stock assessment and Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
accessible to people with disabilities. harvest guideline recommendation, they (CFDA) Number: 84.116A (pre-application)
Requests for sign language will also be briefed on the allocation and 84.116B (final application).
interpretation or other auxiliary aids alternatives being developed by the Dates: Applications Available:
should be directed to Gail Bendixen at CPSAS. September 13, 2004.
907–271–2809 at least 7 working days Although non-emergency issues not Deadline for Transmittal of Pre-
prior to the meeting date. contained in the meeting agenda may Applications: November 3, 2004.

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:21 Sep 10, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2004 / Notices 55145

Deadline for Transmittal of Final Projects designing more cost-effective you use a telecommunications device
Applications: March 22, 2005. ways of improving postsecondary for the deaf (TDD), you may call (toll
Deadline for Intergovernmental instruction and operations, i.e., to free): 1–877–576–7734.
Review: May 21, 2005. promote more student learning relative You may also contact ED Pubs at its
Eligible Applicants: Institutions of to institutional resources expended. Web site: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/
higher education or combinations of Projects to improve the quality of K– edpubs.html or you may contact ED
those institutions and other public and 12 teaching through new models of Pubs at its e-mail address:
private nonprofit institutions and teacher preparation and through new edpubs@inet.ed.gov.
agencies. kinds of partnerships between schools If you request an application from ED
Estimated Available Funds: and colleges and universities that Pubs, be sure to identify this
$12,700,000 for new awards. enhance students’ preparation for, competition as follows: CFDA number
The Administration has requested $32 access to, and success in college. 84.116A.
million for this program for FY 2005 Individuals with disabilities may
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1138–1138d.
(approximately $12.7 million of which obtain a copy of the application package
will be available for new Applicable Regulations: (a) The in an alternative format (e.g., Braille,
Comprehensive Program awards). The Education Department General large print, audiotape, or computer
actual level of funding, if any, depends Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in diskette) by contacting the program
on final congressional action. However, 34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 82, 84, contact person listed in this section.
we are inviting applications to allow 85, 86, 97, 98, and 99.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
enough time to complete the grant Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 Fund for the Improvement of
process if Congress appropriates funds apply to institutions of higher education Postsecondary Education (FIPSE), U.S.
for this program. only.
Department of Education, 1990 K Street,
Estimated Range of Awards:
II. Award Information NW., 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20006–
$50,000—$600,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: 8544. Telephone: (202) 502–7500. The
Type of Award: Discretionary grants application text and forms may be
$212,000 per year. or cooperative awards.
Estimated Number of Awards: 60. obtained from the Internet address:
Estimated Available Funds: http://www.ed.gov/FIPSE.
Note: The Department is not bound by any $12,700,000 for new awards. 2. Content and Form of Application
estimates in this notice. The Administration has requested $32 Submission: Requirements concerning
Project Period: Up to 36 months. million for this program for FY 2005 the content of an application, together
(approximately $12.7 million of which with the forms you must submit, are in
Full Text of Announcement will be available for new the application package for this
I. Funding Opportunity Description Comprehensive Program awards). The competition.
Purpose of Program: The actual level of funding, if any, depends Pre-Application: Letters of support,
Comprehensive Program supports grants on final congressional action. However, references, and other appendices and
and cooperative agreements to improve we are inviting applications to allow attachments are discouraged for the pre-
postsecondary education opportunities. enough time to complete the grant application.
It encourages reforms, innovations, and process if Congress appropriates funds Page Limit: The application narrative
improvements of postsecondary for this program. is where the applicant addresses the
Estimated Range of Awards: selection criteria that reviewers use to
education that respond to problems of
$50,000—$600,000 per year. evaluate the application. You must limit
national significance and provide access
Estimated Average Size of Awards: the pre-application narrative to the
to quality education for all.
Invitational Priorities: For FY 2005 $212,000 per year. equivalent of no more than 5 pages or
Estimated Number of Awards: 60. approximately 1,250 words and the final
these priorities are invitational
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(1) we Note: The Department is not bound by any application narrative to the equivalent
do not give an application that meets estimates in this notice. of no more than 25 pages or
these invitational priorities a Project Period: Up to 36 months. approximately 6,250 words, using the
competitive or absolute preference over following standards:
other applications. III. Eligibility Information • A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
These priorities are: 1. Eligible Applicants: Institutions of only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
Projects to support new ways to higher education or combinations of and both sides.
ensure equal access to postsecondary those institutions and other public and • Double space (no more than three
education and to improve rates of private nonprofit institutions and lines per vertical inch) all text in the
retention and program completion, agencies. application narrative, except footnotes,
especially for underrepresented 2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This quotations, references, and text in
students whose retention and program does not involve cost sharing charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
completion rates continue to lag behind or matching. • Use a font size that is 11 point or
those of other groups, and especially to 3. Other: All applicants must submit larger and no smaller than 10 pitch
encourage wider adoption of proven a pre-application to be eligible to submit (characters per inch).
approaches to this problem. a final application. The page limits for the pre-
Projects to promote innovative application and final application do not
reforms in the curriculum and IV. Application and Submission apply to the title page; the assurances
instruction of various subjects at the Information and certifications; the budget section,
college preparation, undergraduate, and 1. Address to Request Application including the narrative budget
graduate/professional levels, especially Package: Education Publications Center justification for the final application; or
through student-centered or technology- (ED Pubs), P.O. Box 1398, Jessup, MD the one-page abstract, resumes, letters of
mediated strategies, and including the 20794–1398. Telephone (toll free): 1– support, or bibliography for the final
subject area of civic education. 877–433–7827. FAX: (301) 470–1244. If application.

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:21 Sep 10, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1
55146 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2004 / Notices

3. Submission Dates and Times: wait until the application deadline date electronic application for this
Applications Available: September to begin the application process. competition; and
13, 2004. • The regular hours of operation of 2. (a) The e-Application system is
Deadline for Transmittal of Pre- the e-Grants Web site are 6 a.m. Monday unavailable for 60 minutes or more
Applications: November 3, 2004. until 7 p.m. Wednesday; and 6 a.m. between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:30
Deadline for Transmittal of Final Thursday until midnight Saturday, p.m., Washington, DC time, on the
Applications: March 22, 2005. Washington, DC time. Please note that application deadline date; or
We do not consider an application the system is unavailable on Sundays, (b) The e-Application system is
that does not comply with the deadline and between 7 p.m. on Wednesdays and unavailable for any period of time
requirements. 6 a.m. on Thursdays, Washington, DC between 3:30 p.m. and 4:30 p.m.,
Applications for grants under this time, for maintenance. Any Washington, DC time, on the
program may be submitted modifications to these hours are posted application deadline date.
electronically using the Electronic Grant on the e-Grants Web site. We must acknowledge and confirm
Application System (e-Application) • You will not receive additional these periods of unavailability before
accessible through the Department’s e- point value because you submit your granting you an extension. To request
Grants system, or in paper format by application in electronic format, nor this extension or to confirm our
mail or hand delivery. For information will we penalize you if you submit your acknowledgement of any system
(including dates and times) about how application in paper format. unavailability, you may contact either
to submit your application • You must submit all documents (1) the person listed elsewhere in this
electronically, or by mail or hand electronically, including the application notice under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
delivery, please refer to Section IV. 6. for the Comprehensive Program (ED 40– CONTACT (see VII. Agency Contact) or (2)
Other Submission Requirements in this 514), the Comprehensive Program the e-Grants help desk at 1–888–336–
notice. Budget Summary form, and all 8930.
Deadline for Intergovernmental necessary assurances and certifications. Extensions referred to in this section
Review: May 21, 2005. • Your electronic application must apply only to the unavailability of the
4. Intergovernmental Review: This comply with any page limit Department’s e-Application system. If
competition is subject to Executive requirements described in this notice. the e-Application system is available,
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 • Prior to submitting your electronic and, for any reason, you are unable to
CFR part 79. Information about application, you may wish to download submit your application electronically
Intergovernmental Review of Federal it and print a copy of it for your records. or you do not receive an automatic
Programs under Executive Order 12372 • After you electronically submit acknowledgement of your submission,
is in the application package for this your application, you will receive an you may submit your application in
competition. automatic acknowledgement that will paper format by mail or hand delivery
5. Funding Restrictions: We reference include a PR/Award number (an in accordance with the instructions in
regulations outlining funding identifying number unique to your this notice.
restrictions in the Applicable application).
b. Submission of Paper Applications
Regulations section of this notice. • Within three working days after
6. Other Submission Requirements: by Mail.
submitting your electronic application,
Applications for grants under this If you submit your application in
fax a signed copy of the Comprehensive
Comprehensive Program may be paper format by mail (through the U.S.
Program Title Page (Form No. ED 40–
submitted electronically or in paper Postal Service or a commercial carrier),
514) to the Application Control Center
format by mail or hand delivery. you must send the original and two
after following these steps:
a. Electronic Submission of 1. Print ED 40–514 from e- copies of your application, on or before
Applications. Application. the application deadline date, to the
If you submit your application to us 2. The applicant’s Authorizing Department at the following address:
electronically, you must use e- Representative must sign this form. U.S. Department of Education,
Application available through the 3. Place the PR/Award number in the Application Control Center, Attention:
Department’s e-Grants system, upper right hand corner (Item #1) of the (CFDA Number 84116A and 84.116B),
accessible through the e-Grants portal hard-copy signature page of the ED 40– 400 Maryland Avenue, SW.,
page at: http://e-grants.ed.gov. 514. Washington, DC 20202–4260.
While completing your electronic 4. Fax the signed ED 40–514 to the You must show proof of mailing
application, you will be entering data Application Control Center at (202) consisting of one of the following:
online that will be saved into a 245–6272. 1. A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service
database. You may not e-mail an • We may request that you provide us postmark;
electronic copy of a grant application to original signatures on other forms at a 2. A legible mail receipt with the date
us. later date. of mailing stamped by the U.S. Postal
Please note the following: Application Deadline Date Extension Service;
• Your participation in e-Application in Case of System Unavailability: If you 3. A dated shipping label, invoice, or
is voluntary. are prevented from electronically receipt from a commercial carrier; or
• You must complete the electronic submitting your application on the 4. Any other proof of mailing
submission of your grant application by application deadline date because the e- acceptable to the U.S. Secretary of
4:30 p.m., Washington, DC time, on the Application system is unavailable, we Education.
application deadline date. The e- will grant you an extension of one If you mail your application through
Application system will not accept an business day in order to transmit your the U.S. Postal Service, we do not
application for this program application electronically, by mail, or by accept either of the following as proof
[competition] after 4:30 p.m., hand delivery. We will grant this of mailing:
Washington, DC time, on the extension if— 1. A private metered postmark, or
application deadline date. Therefore, we 1. You are a registered user of e- 2. A mail receipt that is not dated by
strongly recommend that you do not Application and you have initiated an the U.S. Postal Service.

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:21 Sep 10, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2004 / Notices 55147

If your application is postmarked after (1) The magnitude or severity of the (2) The extent to which the methods
the application deadline date, we will problem to be addressed by the of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and
not consider your application. proposed project. appropriate to the goals, objectives, and
Note: Applicants should note that the U.S. (2) The magnitude of the need for the outcomes of the proposed project.
Postal Service does not uniformly provide a services to be provided or the activities (3) The extent to which the methods
dated postmark. Before relying on this to be carried out by the proposed of evaluation include the use of
method, you should check with your local project. objective performance measures that are
post office. (b) Significance. The Secretary clearly related to the intended outcomes
c. Submission of Paper Applications considers the significance of the of the project and will produce
by Hand Delivery. proposed project. In determining the quantitative and qualitative data to the
If you submit your application in significance, the Secretary considers extent possible.
paper format by hand delivery, you (or each of the following factors: Final Applications. In evaluating final
a courier service) must hand deliver the (1) The potential contribution of the applications, the Secretary uses the
original and two copies of your proposed project to increased following seven selection criteria:
knowledge or understanding of (a) Need for project. The Secretary
application, on or before the application
educational problems, issues, or considers the need for the proposed
deadline date, to the Department at the
effective strategies. project. In determining need, the
following address: U.S. Department of
(2) The extent to which the proposed Secretary considers each of the
Education, Application Control Center,
project involves the development or following factors:
Attention: (CFDA Number 84.116A or
demonstration of promising new (1) The magnitude or severity of the
84.116B), 550 12th Street, SW., Room
strategies that build on, or are problem to be addressed by the
7041, Potomac Center Plaza,
alternatives to, existing strategies. proposed project.
Washington, DC 20202–4260. (2) The magnitude of the need for the
The Application Control Center (3) The importance or magnitude of
the results or outcomes likely to be services to be provided or the activities
accepts hand deliveries daily between 8 to be carried out by the proposed
a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Washington, DC attained by the proposed project.
(4) The potential replicability of the project.
time, except Saturdays, Sundays and (b) Significance. The Secretary
Federal holidays. A person delivering proposed project or strategies,
considers the significance of the
an application must show photo including, as appropriate, the potential
proposed project. In determining
identification to enter the building. for implementation in a variety of
significance, the Secretary considers
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of settings.
each of the following factors:
Paper Applications: If you mail or hand (c) Quality of the project design. The (1) The potential contribution of the
deliver your application to the Secretary considers the quality of the proposed project to increased
Department: design of the proposed project. In knowledge or understanding of
1. You must indicate on the envelope determining the quality of the design, educational problems, issues, or
the CFDA number and suffix letter, if the Secretary considers each of the effective strategies.
any, of the competition under which following factors: (2) The extent to which the proposed
you are submitting your application. (1) The extent to which the design of project involves the development or
2. The Application Control Center the proposed project is appropriate to, demonstration of promising new
will mail a Grant Application Receipt and will successfully address, the needs strategies that build on, or are
Acknowledgment to you. If you do not of the target population or other alternatives to, existing strategies.
receive the notification of application identified needs. (3) The importance or magnitude of
receipt within 15 days from the mailing (2) The extent to which the goals, the results or outcomes likely to be
of your application, you should call the objectives, and outcomes to be achieved attained by the proposed project.
U.S. Department of Education by the proposed project are clearly (4) The potential replicability of the
Application Control Center at (202) specified and measurable. proposed project or strategies,
245–6288. (3) The extent to which the design for including, as appropriate, the potential
implementing and evaluating the for implementation in a variety of
V. Application Review Information proposed project will result in settings.
Selection Criteria: The selection information to guide possible (c) Quality of the project design. The
criteria for this competition are as replication of project activities or Secretary considers the quality of the
follows: strategies, including information about design of the proposed project. In
In evaluating pre-applications and the effectiveness of the approach or determining the quality of the design,
final applications for grants under this strategies employed by the project. the Secretary considers each of the
competition, the Secretary uses the (4) The extent to which the proposed following factors:
following selection criteria chosen from project is designed to build capacity and (1) The extent to which the design of
those listed in 34 CFR 75.210. The yield results that will extend beyond the the proposed project is appropriate to,
Secretary gives equal weight to each of period of Federal financial assistance. and will successfully address, the needs
the selection criteria, and within each of (d) Quality of the project evaluation. of the target population or other
these criteria, the Secretary gives equal The Secretary considers the quality of identified needs.
weight to each of the factors. the project evaluation to be conducted (2) The extent to which the goals,
Pre-applications. In evaluating pre- of the proposed project. In determining objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
applications, the Secretary uses the the quality of the evaluation, the by the proposed project are clearly
following four selection criteria: Secretary considers each of the specified and measurable.
(a) Need for project. The Secretary following factors: (3) The extent to which the design for
considers the need for the proposed (1) The extent to which the evaluation implementing and evaluating the
project. In determining need, the will provide guidance about effective proposed project will result in
Secretary considers each of the strategies suitable for replication or information to guide possible
following factors: testing in other settings. replication of project activities or

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:21 Sep 10, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1
55148 Federal Register / Vol. 69, No. 176 / Monday, September 13, 2004 / Notices

strategies, including information about (2) The relevance and demonstrated objectives. Their measure should be a
the effectiveness of the approach or commitment of each partner in the part of the project evaluation plan, along
strategies employed by the project. proposed project to the implementation with measures of objectives specific to
(4) The extent to which the proposed and success of the project. your project.
project is designed to build capacity and (3) The potential for continued
yield results that will extend beyond the support of the project after Federal VII. Agency Contact
period of Federal financial assistance. funding ends, including, as appropriate,
the demonstrated commitment of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
(d) Quality of the project evaluation.
The Secretary considers the quality of appropriate entities to such support. Levenia Ishmell, Fund for the
the evaluation to be conducted of the Improvement of Postsecondary
VI. Award Administration Information Education, U.S. Department of
proposed project. In determining the
quality of evaluation to be conducted, 1. Award Notices: If your application Education, 1990 K Street, NW., suite
the Secretary considers each of the is successful, we notify your U.S. 6147, Washington, DC 20006–8544.
following factors: Representative and U.S. Senators and Telephone: (202) 502–7668 or by e-mail
(1) The extent to which the evaluation send you a Grant Award Notification Levenia.Ishmell@ed.gov.
will provide guidance about effective (GAN). We may also notify you
If you use a telecommunications
strategies suitable for replication or informally.
If your application is not evaluated or device for the deaf (TDD), you may call
testing in other settings. the Federal Information Relay Service
not selected for funding, we notify you.
(2) The extent to which the methods 2. Administrative and National Policy (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.
of evaluation are thorough, feasible, and Requirements: We identify
appropriate to the goals, objectives, and Individuals with disabilities may
administrative and national policy obtain this document in an alternative
outcomes of the proposed project. requirements in the application package
(3) The extent to which the methods format (e.g., Braille, large print,
and reference these and other audiotape, or computer diskette) on
of evaluation include the use of requirements in the Applicable
objective performance measures that are request to the program contact person
Regulations section of this notice. listed in this section.
clearly related to the intended outcomes We reference the regulations outlining
of the project and will produce the terms and conditions of an award in For additional program information
quantitative and qualitative data to the the Applicable Regulations section of call the FIPSE office (202–502–7500)
extent possible. this notice and include these and other between the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m.
(e) Quality of the management plan. specific conditions in the GAN. The Washington, DC time, Monday through
The Secretary considers the quality of GAN also incorporates your approved Friday.
the management plan for the proposed application as part of your binding
project. In determining the quality of the VIII. Other Information
commitments under the grant.
management plan, the Secretary 3. Reporting: At the end of your Electronic Access to This Document:
considers the adequacy of the project period, you must submit a final
management plan to achieve the You may view this document, as well as
performance report, including financial all other documents of this Department
objectives of the proposed project on information, as directed by the
time and within budget, including published in the Federal Register, in
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year text or Adobe Portable Document
clearly defined responsibilities, award, you must submit an annual
timelines, and milestones for Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
performance report that provides the
accomplishing project tasks. following site: http://www.ed.gov/news/
most current performance and financial
(f) Quality of project personnel. The expenditure information as specified by fedregister.
Secretary considers the quality of the the Secretary in 34 CFR 75.118. To use PDF you must have Adobe
personnel who will carry out the 4. Performance Measures: The success Acrobat Reader, which is available free
proposed project. In determining the of FIPSE’s Comprehensive Program at this site. If you have questions about
quality of project personnel the depends upon (1) the extent to which using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Secretary considers each of the funded projects are being replicated, Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
following factors: i.e., adopted or adapted by others; and 888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
(1) The extent to which the applicant (2) the manner in which projects are DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
encourages applications for employment being institutionalized and continued
from persons who are members of Note: The official version of this document
after grant funding. These two results
groups that have traditionally been is the document published in the Federal
constitute FIPSE’s indicators of the
underrepresented based on race, color, Register. Free Internet access to the official
success of our program.
national origin, gender, age, or If funded, you will be asked to collect edition of the Federal Register and the Code
disability. of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
and report data in your project’s annual
Access at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
(2) The qualifications, including performance report (EDGAR, 34 CFR
index.html.
relevant training and experience, of key 75.590) on steps taken toward these
project personnel. goals. Consequently, applicants to Dated: September 8, 2004.
(g) Adequacy of resources. The FIPSE’s Comprehensive Program are
Sally L. Stroup,
Secretary considers the adequacy of advised to include these two outcomes
resources for the proposed project. In in conceptualizing the design, Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary
determining the adequacy of resources, implementation and evaluation of the Education.
the Secretary considers each of the proposed project. Consideration of [FR Doc. E4–2165 Filed 9–10–04; 8:45 am]
following factors: FIPSE’s two performance outcomes is an BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
(1) The extent to which the costs are important part of many of the review
reasonable in relation to the objectives, criteria discussed below. Thus, it is
design, and potential significance of the important to the success of your
proposed project. application that you include these

VerDate jul<14>2003 15:21 Sep 10, 2004 Jkt 203001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\13SEN1.SGM 13SEN1

Potrebbero piacerti anche