Sei sulla pagina 1di 20

federal register

Tuesday
April 20, 1999

Part II

Department of
Education
Bilingual Education: Field-Initiated
Research Program; Notice
19410 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION years. Research under this program may (iv) The importance or magnitude of
provide for longitudinal studies of the results or outcomes likely to be
[CFDA No.: 84.292B]
students or teachers in bilingual attained by the proposed project,
Bilingual Education: Field-Initiated education, monitoring the education of especially improvements in teaching
Research Program those students from entry in bilingual and student achievement.
education through secondary school (c) Quality of the project design (50
Notice Inviting Applications for
ACTION: completion. points). (1) The Secretary considers the
New Awards for Fiscal Year (FY) 1999. quality of the design of the proposed
Priority project.
Note to Applicants: This notice is a Invitational Priority (2) In determining the quality of the
complete application package. Together design of the proposed project, the
with the statute authorizing the program The Secretary is particularly
Secretary considers the following
and applicable regulations governing interested in applications that meet the
factors:
this program, including the Education following invitational priority.
(i) The extent to which the goals,
Department General Administrative However, an application that meets this
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
Regulations (EDGAR), this notice invitational priority does not receive
by the proposed project are clearly
contains all of the information, competitive or absolute preference over
specified and measurable.
application forms, and instructions other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)): (ii) The extent to which the proposed
needed to apply for a grant under this Applications that propose to focus on
project is based upon a specific research
program. The statutory authorization for research that leads to answering
design, and the quality and
this program is contained in section significant questions on the assessment
appropriateness of that design,
7132 of the Elementary and Secondary of academic achievement for LEP
including the scientific rigor of the
Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), 20 U.S.C. students.
studies involved.
7452, as amended by the Improving Note: For further information on (iii) The extent to which the design of
America’s Schools Act of 1994, Pub. L. assessment issues, see ‘‘High Stakes the proposed project includes a
103–382 (October 20, 1994). Assessment: A Research Agenda for thorough, high-quality review of the
Purpose of Program: The purpose of English Language Learners,’’ which is relevant literature, a high-quality plan
this program is to provide grants for available from the National for project implementation, and the use
field-initiated research activities related Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education, of appropriate methodological tools to
to the improvement of bilingual telephone—1–800–321–6223 or website ensure successful achievement of
education and special alternative at http://www.ncbe.gwu.edu. project objectives.
instructional programs for limited (iv) The extent to which the proposed
Selection Criteria
English proficient (LEP) children and project is part of a comprehensive effort
youth. The Secretary uses the following to improve teaching and learning and
Eligible Applicants: Institutions of selection criteria in 34 CFR 75.210 to support rigorous academic standards for
higher education, nonprofit evaluate applications for new grants students.
organizations, State educational under this competition. (d) Quality of project personnel (20
agencies, and local educational agencies The maximum score for all of these points). (1) The Secretary considers the
that have received grants under subparts criteria is 100 points. quality of the personnel who will carry
1 or 2 of Part A (or Part A or Part B, as The maximum score for each criterion out the proposed project.
in effect prior to October 20, 1994) of is indicated in parentheses. (2) In determining the quality of
Title VII of the ESEA within the (a) Need for project (5 points). (1) The project personnel, the Secretary
previous five years. Secretary considers the need for the considers the extent to which the
Deadline for Transmittal of proposed project. (2) In determining the applicant encourages applications for
Applications: May 20, 1999. need for the proposed project, the employment from persons who are
Deadline for Intergovernmental Secretary considers the extent to which members of groups that have
Review: July 19, 1999. specific gaps or weaknesses in services, traditionally been underrepresented
Available Funds: $170,000. infrastructure, or opportunities have based on race, color, national origin,
Estimated Range of Awards: $50,000– been identified and will be addressed by gender, age, or disability.
$70,000. the proposed project, including the (3) In addition, the Secretary
Estimated Average Size of Awards: nature and magnitude of those gaps or considers the following factors:
$60,000. weaknesses. (i) The qualifications, including
Estimated Number of Awards: 3. (b) Significance (10 points). (1) The relevant training and experience, of the
Secretary considers the significance of project director or principal
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
the proposed project. investigator.
(2) In determining the significance of (ii) The qualifications, including
Project Period: 12 months. the proposed project, the Secretary relevant training and experience, of key
Applicable Regulations: The considers the following factors: project personnel.
Education Department General (i) The significance of the problem or (e) Adequacy of resources (5 points).
Administrative Regulations (EDGAR) in issue to be addressed by the proposed (1) The Secretary considers the
34 CFR parts 74, 75, 77, 79, 80, 81, 82, project. adequacy of resources for the proposed
85, and 86, and the regulations in 34 (ii) The potential contribution of the project.
CFR part 299, General Provisions, ESEA. proposed project to increased (2) In determining the adequacy of
Description of Program: Funds under knowledge or understanding of resources for the proposed project, the
this program are available to carry out educational problems, issues, or Secretary considers the following
field-initiated research conducted by effective strategies. factors:
current or recent recipients of grants (iii) The likelihood that the proposed (i) The extent to which the budget is
under subparts 1 or 2 who have received project will result in system change or adequate to support the proposed
those grants within the previous five improvement. project.
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices 19411

(ii) The extent to which the costs are Department of Education, Washington, Application Instructions and Forms
reasonable in relation to the objectives, D.C. 20202–0124. The appendix to this notice contains
design, and potential significance of the Proof of mailing will be determined the following forms and instructions,
proposed project. on the same basis as applications (see 34 plus a statement regarding estimated
(f) Quality of the management plan CFR 75.102). Recommendations or public reporting burden, a notice to
(10 points). (1) The Secretary considers comments may be hand-delivered until applicants regarding compliance with
the quality of the management plan for 4:30 p.m. (EST) on the date indicated in section 427 of the General Education
the proposed project. this Notice. Provisions Act (GEPA), a checklist for
(2) In determining the quality of the Please note that the above address is applicants, various assurances,
management plan for the proposed not the same address as the one to certifications, and required
project, the Secretary considers the which the applicant submits its documentation:
following factors: completed application. Do not send a. Instructions for the Application
(i) The adequacy of the management applications to the above address. Narrative.
plan to achieve the objectives of the Instructions For Transmittal of b. Additional Guidance.
proposed project on time and within Applications c. Estimated Public Reporting Burden
budget, including clearly defined Statement.
responsibilities, timelines, and (a) If an applicant wants to apply for
a grant, the applicant shall— d. Notice to All Applicants.
milestones for accomplishing project e. Checklist for Applicants.
tasks. (1) Mail the original and two copies
of the application on or before the f. Application for Federal Assistance
(ii) The extent to which the time (Standard Form 424) and instructions.
commitments of the project director and deadline date to: U.S. Department of
Education, Application Control Center, g. Budget Information—Non-
principal investigator and other key Construction Programs (ED Form No.
project personnel are appropriate and Attention (CFDA# 84.292B),
Washington, D.C. 20202–4725 or 524) and instructions.
adequate to meet the objectives of the h. Eligibility Certification.
proposed project. (2) Hand-deliver the original and two
copies of the application by 4:30 p.m. i. Assurances—Non-Construction
Intergovernmental Review of Federal (EST) on or before the deadline date to: Programs (Standard Form 424B) and
Programs U.S. Department of Education, instructions.
Application Control Center, Attention: j. Certifications Regarding: Lobbying;
This program is subject to the Debarment, Suspension and Other
requirements of Executive Order 12372 (CFDA# 84.292B), Room #3633,
Regional Office Building #3, 7th and D Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free
(Intergovernmental Review of Federal Workplace Requirements (ED 80–0013)
Programs) and the regulations in 34 CFR Streets, SW., Washington, D.C.
(b) An applicant must show one of the and instructions.
part 79. The objective of the Executive k. Certification Regarding Debarment,
order is to foster an intergovernmental following as proof of mailing:
(1) A legibly dated U.S. Postal Service Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary
partnership and to strengthen Exclusion: Lower Tier Covered
federalism by relying on State and local postmark.
(2) A legible mail receipt with the Transactions (ED 80–0014, 9/90) and
processes for State and local instructions.
government coordination and review of date of mailing stamped by the U.S.
proposed Federal financial assistance. Postal Service. (Note: ED 80–0014 is intended for the use of
(3) A dated shipping label, invoice, or grantees and should not be transmitted to the
Applicants must contact the Department.)
appropriate State Single Point of receipt from a commercial carrier.
Contact to find out about, and to comply (4) Any other proof of mailing l. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities
with, the State’s process under acceptable to the Secretary. (Standard Form LLL) (if applicable) and
Executive Order 12372. Applicants (c) If an application is mailed through instructions.
proposing to perform activities in more the U.S. Postal Service, the Secretary An applicant may submit information
than one State should immediately does not accept either of the following on a photostatic copy of the application
contact the Single Point of Contact for as proof of mailing: and budget forms, the assurances, and
each of those States and follow the (1) A private metered postmark. the certifications. However, the
procedure established in each State (2) A mail receipt that is not dated by application form, the assurances, and
under the Executive order. If you want the U.S. Postal Service. the certifications must each have an
to know the name and address of any Notes: (1) The U.S. Postal Service does not original signature.
State Single Point of Contact, see the list uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before All applicants must submit ONE
published in the Federal Register on relying on this method, an applicant should original signed application, including
November 3, 1998 (63 FR 59452 through check with its local post office. ink signatures on all forms and
(2) The Application Control Center will assurances, and TWO copies of the
59455). mail a Grant Application Receipt
In States that have not established a application. Please mark each
Acknowledgment to each applicant. If an
process or chosen a program for review, applicant fails to receive the notification of
application as ‘‘original’’ or ‘‘copy.’’ No
State, areawide, regional, and local application receipt within 15 days from the grant may be awarded unless a
entities may submit comments directly date of mailing the application, the applicant completed application has been
to the Department. Any State Process should call the U.S. Department of Education received.
Recommendation and other comments Application Control Center at (202) 708– FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
submitted by a State Single Point of 9495. Milagros Lanauze, U.S. Department of
Contact and any comments from State, (3) The applicant must indicate on the Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW.,
envelope and—if not provided by the
areawide, regional, and local entities Department—in Item 3 of the Application for
Room 5086, Switzer Building,
must be mailed or hand-delivered by the Federal Assistance (Standard Form 424) the Washington, D.C. 20202–6510.
date indicated in this notice to the CFDA number—and suffix letter, if any—of Telephone: (202) 205–9475. Individuals
following address: The Secretary, E.O. the competition under which the application who use a telecommunications device
12372—CFDA# 84.292B, U.S. is being submitted. for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
19412 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices

Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1– complete and review the information Budget
800–877–8339. collection. If you have any comments
Individuals with disabilities may concerning the accuracy of the time Budget line items must support the
obtain this notice in an alternate format estimate or suggestions for improving goals and objectives of the proposed
(e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, or this form, please write to: U.S. project and must be directly related to
computer diskette) on request to the Department of Education, Washington, the instructional design and all other
contact person listed in the preceding D.C. 20202–4651. project components.
paragraph. Please note, however, that If you have comments or concerns Final Application Preparation
the Department is not able to reproduce regarding the status of your individual
in an alternate format the standard submission of this form, write directly Use the Checklist for Applicants to
forms included in the notice. to: Office of Bilingual Education and verify that your application is complete.
Minority Languages Affairs, U.S. Submit three copies of the application,
Electronic Access to This Document Department of Education, 400 Maryland including an original copy containing
Anyone may view this document, as Avenue, SW., Room 5086, Switzer an original signature for each form
well as all other Department of Building, Washington, D.C. 20202–6510. requiring the signature of the authorized
Education documents published in the Instructions for the Application representative. Do not use elaborate
Federal Register, in text or portable Narrative bindings or covers. The application
document format (pdf) on the World package must be mailed or hand-
Wide Web at either of the following Mandatory Page Limit for the delivered to the Application Control
sites: Application Narrative Center (ACC) and postmarked by the
http://ocfo.ed.gov/fedreg.htm The narrative portion of the deadline date.
http://www.ed.gov/news.html application must not exceed 50 pages. Submission of Application to State
To use the pdf you must have the Adobe These pages must be double-spaced and Educational Agency
Acrobat Reader Program with Search, printed on one side only. A legible font
size and adequate margins should be Section 7116(a)(2) of the ESEA, 20
which is available free at either of the
used. The narrative section must be U.S.C. 7426(a)(2), requires all applicants
preceding sites. If you have questions
paginated and should include a one- except schools funded by the Bureau of
about using the pdf, call the U.S.
page abstract. The 50-page limit applies Indian Affairs to submit a copy of their
Government Printing Office toll free at
to the abstract, proposal narrative, application to their State educational
1–888–293–6498.
charts, graphs, tables, graphics, budget agency (SEA) for review and comment.
Anyone may also view these narrative, position descriptions (and
documents in text copy only on an Section 75.156 of EDGAR requires these
resumes, if included), and any applicants to submit their application to
electronic bulletin board of the appendices. The page limit does not
Department. Telephone: (202) 219–1511 the SEA on or before the deadline date
apply to application forms, attachments for submitting their application to the
or, toll-free, 1–800–222–4922. The to those forms, assurances,
documents are located under Option Department of Education. This section
certifications, and the table of contents. of EDGAR also requires applicants to
G—Files/Announcements, Bulletins and The page limit applies only to item 11
Press Releases. attach to their application a copy of
and not to the other items in the their letter that requests the SEA to
Note: The official version of this document Checklist for Applicants. Applications comment on the application (34 CFR
is the document published in the Federal with a narrative section that exceeds the 75.156). A copy of this letter should be
Register. page limit will not be considered for attached to the Project Documentation
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7452. funding. The narrative section should Form contained in this application
Dated: April 14, 1999. begin with an abstract that includes a package. Applicants that do not submit
Delia Pompa, short description of the population to be a copy of their application to their state
Director, Office of Bilingual Education and served by the project, project objectives, educational agency in accordance with
Minority Languages Affairs. and planned project activities. these statutory and regulatory
Estimated Public Reporting Burden Selection Criteria requirements will not be considered for
Statement funding.
The narrative should address fully all
According to the Paperwork aspects of the selection criteria in the Checklist for Applicants
Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are order listed and should give detailed
information regarding each criterion. Do The following forms and other items
required to respond to a collection of
not simply paraphrase the criteria. Do must be included in the application in
information unless it displays a valid
not include resumes or curriculum vitae the order listed below:
OMB control number. The valid OMB
control number for this information for project personnel; provide position 1. Application for Federal Assistance
collection is OMB No. 1885–0547 (Exp. descriptions instead. Form (OMB No. 1875–0106).
04/30/2002). The time required to Additional Guidance 2. Budget Information Form (ED Form
complete this information collection is No. 524).
estimated to average 145 hours per Table of Contents
response, including the time to review The application should include a 3. Itemized budget for each year.
instructions, search existing data table of contents listing the sections in 4. Assurances—Non-Construction
resources, gather the data needed, and the order required. Programs Form (SF 424B).
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices 19413

5. Certifications Regarding Lobbying, 7. Disclosure of Lobbying Activities 11. Application narrative, including
Debarment, Suspension and Other Form (SF–LLL). abstract (not to exceed 50 pages).
Responsibility Matters; and Drug-Free 8. Copy of letter requesting SEA 12. One original and two copies of the
Workplace Requirements Form (ED 80– comment on the application. application for transmittal to the
0013).
9. Form on General Education Education Department’s Application
6. Certification Regarding Debarment,
Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Provisions Act (GEPA) Requirement Control Center.
Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered (See section entitled NOTICE TO ALL BILLING CODE 4000–01–U
Transactions Form (ED 80–0014) (if APPLICANTS (OMB No. 1801–0004)).
applicable). 10. Table of Contents.
19414 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices 19415
19416 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices 19417
19418 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices 19419
19420 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices 19421
19422 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices 19423
19424 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices 19425
19426 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices 19427
19428 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 20, 1999 / Notices

[FR Doc. 99–9803 Filed 4–19–99; 8:45 am]


BILLING CODE 4000–01–U

Potrebbero piacerti anche